Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chicdat/G13 supporting !vote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Deleted G7 per Chicdat's request Special:Diff/970608355 Cabayi (talk) 13:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chicdat/G13 supporting !vote

Misconceived idea - it's transcluded into several MFD's & open to malicious editing which could alter Chicdat's !votes. It embodies a false idea of equivalence between deletions under G13 (for which WP:REFUND is available) and MFD (for which it is not). It also shows Chicdat is !voting without due consideration of the topic at hand. Cabayi (talk) 18:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. Bad idea for several reasons. Spicy (talk) 19:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just subst. I really don't see the need for deletion here, but this shouldn't be transcluded. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:17, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
subst and delete What use is it if it can't be transcluded? Chicdat ought to be encouraged to put due thought into each and every !vote they make.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This sort of think is a not terribly uncommonly done bad idea. I’m not sure deletion is right as the first response. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just delete. I don't care. 🐔 Chic dat ^ChickenDatabase 09:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.