Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 May 28

< May 27	May 29 >

May 28

File:Bisla.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bisla.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

No source or license and appears to be a copyright violation from http://www.iplt20.com/teams/kolkata-knight-riders/squad Eeekster (talk) 01:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HadjiDimitar150.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HadjiDimitar150.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no freedom of panorama in bulgaria. the uploader did not identify the date the sculpture was created, so we cannot verify its copyright status. i tried to research the date but didn't find anything. perhaps searching in bulgarian will be necessary. (i did a bit of this too, but didn't come up with anything.) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maanafossen2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Eustress (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maanafossen2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maanafossen2.JPG Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:19, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pizap.com13381113078901.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pizap.com13381113078901.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

A modification of an alternative cover to "Paranoid". Cannot be freely licensed. J Milburn (talk) 09:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sohail Abbas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sohail Abbas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to have been taken from this site. J Milburn (talk) 10:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Smallcolourpickpic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smallcolourpickpic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Seems like a promotional image, and there is no evidence of permission. Muhandes (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After nominating, I noticed the metadata says Author: SUKEY PARNELL Copyright holder: 2009 Sukey@sukeyparnell.com and there is no evidence the uploader is Sukey Parnell. I speedied the file on these grounds, so this PuF may not be necessary. --Muhandes (talk) 11:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: uploader indicated he is the owner so this should be put on hold. --Muhandes (talk) 11:15, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am speculating here, but it seems like once the uploader realized an autobiography will not be tolerated, he lost interest, and will most probably not donate the image. The image copyright status is therefore still unclear and it should be removed. The uploader can re-upload it if he wishes to donate it properly. --Muhandes (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rooftop Prince cast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rooftop Prince cast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No trace of this photo in SBS related websites, thus I dispute that this was released as press photo by SBS. Seems more like a photo taken by a newspaper at the press conference. Therefore not under fair use. 小龙 (Timish) # ^{xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng} 14:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can we move this to Common? I wish it wouldn't be deleted. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 13:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Strangely sourced. Has watermark indicating one site, claims to be © Sŏul Pangsong Kŭrup, sourced to Kpopwave. Kpopwave furthermore seems to have images from lots of different places, so I'd say that we need a better source to avoid any WP:NFCC#10a failure. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Trayvon Martin at 7-11.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trayvon Martin at 7-11.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

If this is from a shop CCTV camera, I doubt it belongs to the State of Florida. J Milburn (talk) 21:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The State of Florida listed the 7-11 video as evidence and then released the video to the public per FL law. See: http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/prosecutors-have-video-evidence-in-trayvon-martin-slaying/ ITBlair (talk) 21:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two more Links about the public release of this surveillance video: http://newsone.com/2016203/trayvon-martin-7-11/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/17/evidence-trayvon-martin_n_1525285.html ITBlair (talk) 21:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Web Site on FL Sunshine Law: http://myfloridalegal.com/pages.nsf/Main/321B47083D80C4CD8525791B006A54E3

Comment: didn't we have some precedents suggesting that CCTV footage is generally uncopyrightable? After all, there's no human creativity involved in creating it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:48, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Since the source of the picture is the NY Daily News, I think it would probably fall under WP:NFC#Images (specifically #8, last known image of subject, and #10) and since it is just a still from the CCTV footage, it would qualify for Fair Use under U.S. copyright laws. Additionally see [1] (still from CCTV footage of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold) and [2] where it was used in the article.-- Isaidnoway (talk) 20:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not produced by Florida, so I don't see how it could be {{PD-FLGov}}. Any kind of material could be used as evidence for a crime. For example, if a book is stolen, the book (if later found) could be used as evidence of the crime. This doesn't give the state any permission to release the book to the public domain. I remember previous discussions on surveillance cameras but don't remember what the result was. One could maybe say that the guy who installed the camera is the author behind the photo... --Stefan2 (talk) 00:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Whitfield Lovell, Pago Pago, 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitfield Lovell, Pago Pago, 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

the photograph is doubtfully "self" - "Courtesy DC Moore Gallery, New York." the subject (2008) is most likely (c) Skier Dude (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph is Copyright DC Moore Gallery 2008, shared by the gallery

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Robert Kushner, Spring Scatter Summation (Panel 5 of 5), 2005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Kushner, Spring Scatter Summation (Panel 5 of 5), 2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

the photograph is doubtfully "self" - "Courtesy DC Moore Gallery, New York." the subject (2008) is most likely (c) Skier Dude (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph is Copyright DC Moore Gallery 2005, shared by the gallery — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooreart (talk • contribs) 15:45, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark Innerst, Vanishing Point, 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark Innerst, Vanishing Point, 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

the photograph is doubtfully "self" - "Courtesy DC Moore Gallery, New York." the subject (2008) is most likely (c) Skier Dude (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph is Copyright DC Moore Gallery 2012, shared by the gallery — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooreart (talk • contribs) 15:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Asau build.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as previously published prior to the upload date (via Google reverse image search). — ξ ^xplicit 00:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asau build.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Building creation date is unknown (looks like late 1920s from article) - No FoP in Armenia - commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Armenia, copyright would probably have been restored on January 1, 1996 and 70 years have not passed... May be suitable for {{FoP-USonly}} Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment URAA is irrelevant for buildings. USA has FOP for buildings and besides there is no copyright for pre-1990 buildings in the USA anyway. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hag curr web.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hag curr web.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Composite of various images - suspect some will have copyright. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Language Houses (Chico).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Language Houses (Chico).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Mural = 2D artwork. No permission from painter. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a mural permanently installed in a public place. There is no reasonable expectation by any public mural artist that permission is required to reproduce an image of the mural. Furthermore, the image depicts another public place, which is being identified with the image.Greg Bard (talk) 23:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No freedom of panorama for murals in the United States, see Commons:COM:FOP#United States. Undated, so impossible to determine if the copyright has expired because of age. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Royal Opera House Oman.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep FoP-USonly. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Opera House Oman.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of a new building. Copyright law of Oman (http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=3835) does not show any exception for buildings, "architecture" does come under the scope at Article 2, section g. Maybe fit for {{FoP-USonly}} Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.