Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rzrscm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/7/0); Closed per WP:NOTNOW by FASTILY (TALK) at 16:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
[edit]Rzrscm (talk · contribs) – rzrscm rzrscm (talk) 10:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I intend to do mainly routine maintenance and respond to requests for my help.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: I mainly contribute by cleaning up articles by fixing grammar issues and removing vandalism and unnecessary unsourced statements. I have recently been working on the shock value article to expand it, source it, and make it more than just a stub. I plan to take on more projects like this.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I have had editing conflicts with other users, and dealt with it by discussing it and trying to come to a mutual agreement as to what should be done. I would do the same in the future.
General comments
[edit]- Links for Rzrscm: Rzrscm (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Rzrscm can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
[edit]- omg i like dis guy he luks kwl so can umake admin plz x
Oppose
[edit]- Oppose Sorry, I'd like to see a bit more experience. 600 edits is too low for me. Theleftorium (talk) 11:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:NOTNOW. Try again later... I want to see more edits and experience. BejinhanTalk 11:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - I don't want to come off as too harsh here, but as I approach 40 thousand edits I only now begin to fully comprehend how complex an admin's job really is. And you not only have to have a solid grasp of policy here - you have to have proven moral authority and world-class patience. Since an admin appointment is forever, this particular Rfa won't attract much support. Suggest a minimum of six months of growth and involvement before trying again. Also suggest candidate withdraw, or that this Rfa be closed asap under WP:SNOW. Jusdafax 13:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose not enough experience in admin related section of Wikipedia. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 14:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Per WP:NOTNOW, Administration isn't for New Users (Essay) and Only 575 Live Edits. Try again In about 6 Months - Year Floul1 | My Talkpage | Vandalise Here 14:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose 600 edits is quite low but not too low (I usually care more of the quality of edits than of quantity), and speaking of a poor answer to Q1, I highly suggest that WP:Admin Coaching is a good place to start before becoming an administrator. Minimac (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Per Wikipedia:NOTNOW. Please read the guide to current practice on Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship & Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list, and try again after some months with more experience. Vipinhari || talk 15:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.