Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/S1312
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/4/2); ended 15:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW - HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC) ; Originally scheduled to end: 14:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Nomination
[edit]S1312 (talk · contribs) – I have been using wikipedia for 2 years, I've been a registered user on wikipedia since 17 May, 2010. I do Many Very helpful Things For Wikipedia like fixing typos, Adding Links, and many other important tasks. I'm Very important To Wikipedia, and always try to do the right thing. Also, I have never vandalized any pages. Also Editing Wikipedia Is One Of my Big Hobbys, (As it may say on top, This will end on 10 August 2010 at 14:41 (UTC).) S1312 (talk) 14:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]NOTE FROM S1312: If you want to ask me a private and/or personal question, please email me
—Preceding unsigned comment added by S1312 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: Protecting Wikipedia (Like Blocking Users That Vandalize Pages Repeatedly, Blocking Users That Are Sockpuppeteers, protect and delete pages.)
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: That Would be Things like Fixing errors, Adding Important links & Adding More Info.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: Well, before I Had a user account, I did end up in some (but very few) edit conflicts, (but i was only an IP user). And For how i will deal with it in the future, I will just simplely leave a message on the users talk page.
General comments
[edit]- Links for S1312: S1312 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for S1312 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- Not yet. not even 300 edits, answers to questions aren't very good, and over half of the edits are to userspace. Pilif12p : Yo 14:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. Your heart appears to be in the right place, but you need a lot more time and experience before you can be seriously considered for adminship. Spend more time and effort familiarizing yourself with the various aspects of Wikipedia, and consider another RfA after several months and a few thousand more edits. Richwales (talk · contribs · review) 14:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose: Sorry, but it is just too early. You have less than 50 contributions in article namespace. --Leyo 14:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose way, way too early. I like the candidate's enthusiasm for the project; however 240 edits, 41 to articlespace simply isn't enough time invested in the project--Hokeman (talk) 15:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- Neutral - I'm happy that you're enthusiastic about the project, but you might want to read WP:NOTNOW. I don't think you have enough experience, particularly in admin-related areas. Get involved with AfD, CSD, RfA, AIV, etc and come back in a year with many thousands of edits under your belt and you might be ready for the tools. Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 14:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Not opposing, because I'd prefer to encourage you. I can't support you, because you don't have enough experience to be seeking adminship right now. Your contributions are not enough to demonstrate that you have the knowledge and experience required. I'd also reiterate the recommendation to read WP:NOTNOW, and a great idea would be to look through some previous unsuccessful and successful RFAs to understand the high levels of contribution and experience editors expect to see in an Admin candidate. I do encourage you to carry on and increase your involvement, and try again when you have those levels of experience. Not Capitalising Every Word In A Sentence may be something to consider, too - in all seriousness, this is a project to build an encyclopedia, which follows a manual of style. Whilst it is certainly not necessary to post everything in project space and talk space according to the MOS, it is likely to raise a few eyebrows and cause a little concern if something like an RFA is so oddly formatted. Begoontalk 14:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.