Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Who Am I Why Am I Here
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page)
Final (0/2/0); ended 06:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC) - User blocked for abusing multiple accounts. - Goodvac (talk) 06:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
[edit]Who Am I Why Am I Here (talk · contribs) – Although I may not have been here long, I shall do well. I will be dedicated to rotting out vandalism while at the same time improving Wikipedia's quality. I shall help continue Wikipedia's stellar reputation of quality information. Who Am I Why Am I Here? (talk) 05:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: All work that may be needed
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: Editing grammar is what I find most important.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I have not and will never get in any feuds.
- Additional question from Who Am I Why Am I Here
- Number of question. Question
- A:
General comments
[edit]- Links for Who Am I Why Am I Here: Who Am I Why Am I Here (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Who Am I Why Am I Here can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- Strong Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. With only 55 edits and less than a month's worth of experience, this user clearly does not have enough experience to become an admin at the moment. Also does not seem to understand what an admin does on Wikipedia. Eagles 24/7 (C) 05:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose as per WP:NOTNOW. Sorry but you've only been a member of Wikipedia a couple of weeks so this is too soon. I suggest trying again in 6 months or a years time and use that time to learn about the encyclopedia. There is a whole lot more to Wikipedia than just fighting vandalism and correcting grammar. Also your answer to question 3 worries me as being an admin means that you would be trying to resolve disagreements. Ideally you would need to have experience of WP:3RR.--5 albert square (talk) 05:48, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.