Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Decato

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Decato}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Arankar

[edit]
  • Code letter: F

Account activity started soon after the blocking of Giza D, edits to Talk:United Nations pushing identical POV, no other edits. Michaelbusch 18:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed.  IP blocked. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 21:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Giza D

[edit]
  • Code letter: F

Editing same articles, Cindy Sheehan, Hezboullah etc. Similar POV.-- Zleitzen(talk) 14:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


 Confirmed --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 06:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Reapor2

[edit]
  • Code letter:F

Relisting: editing same articles, similar POV, puppeteer recently used a (now blocked) sockpuppet account named User:ReaporJRSP 21:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no Unnecessary --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can I just report the case at the admin noticeboard? JRSP 00:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. It's an obvious sock. Or just find a friendly admin to do it; the same person who knocked out Reapor might be the best candidate. (Hint: [1] ) --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reapor

[edit]
  • Code letter:F

Relisting: similar pattern of Magic Kirin/Tannim/Decato/Preform, that is, poorly sourced POV edits in articles Hugo Chávez, Cindy Sheehan and A.N.S.W.E.R. JRSP 11:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Skypad

[edit]
  • Code letter:F

Relisting as I have strong suspicions that this user is Decato/Tannim/Preform, as his edits to Hugo Chávez article & talk page are similar POV, unsourced or poorly sourced additions. JRSP 22:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Mackensen (talk) 19:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Decato

[edit]

Strong suspicions that this user is banned user MagicKirin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who also used the now banned account Tannim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Preform (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Same articles - picking up the same points of issue.--Zleitzen 15:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed. You'll need to provide some evidence for these strong suspicions. Essjay (Talk) 22:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: This case should have been done as a relisting of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Preform. The only new name is Decato. Please provide some evidence for your suspicion as Essjay says. Thatcher131 22:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Note: applicant notified at 23:46, December 7, 2006 (UTC) Daniel.Bryant T · C ] 23:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information as requested

 Confirmed. Essjay (Talk) 01:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: Followup: Decato is vigorously denying any connection to MagicKirin via email. Quick tip for knowing it's him: The name in your inbox is "Decato" but the email address is "magickirin at aol dot com." Essjay (Talk) 23:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decato

[edit]
  • Code letter: F

Strong suspicions that this user is banned user MagicKirin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who also used the now banned account Tannim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).(admission here [5]) Same group of articles - Hugo Chavez - Cindy Sheehan, Hezbollah - picking up where the previous account was banned. Same arguments. Same litany of poor edits reverted immediately by numerous editors. Same pattern of being oblivious to the fact that his use of a new sockpuppet is transparent.--Zleitzen 12:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Essjay (Talk) 03:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Moved to correct page, and reformatted properly. (from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Preform) Prodego talk 21:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.