Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 5

< July 4	July 6 >

July 5

Template:Un-fullfur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Un-fullfur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Policy concern, namely that it may BITE new users? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The nominator created this unused template. What is to be discussed here? Lastcent (talk) 00:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment is this a {{db-author}} ? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-free autogen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free autogen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seemingly used to mmark where NFUR have been generated with FURME or other tools. Seemingly created originalyl in connection with a rejected bot proposal for autogeneration of NFUR's (which was considered against policy) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the nominator created this template. Is this a {{db-author}} ? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Un-childphoto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Un-childphoto (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

BITEy, At the very least the language needs a re-tone, WP doesn't currently need model/consent releases for otherwise legal photos, so there is a concern this may be outside policy. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the nominator created this template. Is this a {{db-author}} ? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sister only source

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sister only source (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Concerns that this may not be within current policy. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what the problem is. It's a file cleanup message. Its use should be in tandem with an FFD nomination for poorly/badly sourced media. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the nominator created this template. Is this a {{db-author}} ? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Contains proprietary links

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Contains proprietary links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Whilst in use, considered to BITEy, and WP:NOTSOAPBOX Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the nominator created this template. Is this a {{db-author}} ? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Stella-info

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Jenks24 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stella-info (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was created to standardise a number of items tagged with a particualr license. TfD as that task was nominaly completed. Not seemingly in use as this template normally subst. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as G7. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ia-disputed description

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ia-disputed description (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seemingly unused, so wondering if this (own creation) is duplicated by another template? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if the nominator, who created this a week ago, has no use for it, seems like a {{db-author}} ; and we already have an accuracy cleanup message {{accuracy}} and dispute cleanup message {{disputed}} which can be combined with a talk page message documenting what is wrong. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GTA Mass Transit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 July 13 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Midland Football Combination and Midland Football Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Midland Combination (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Midland Football Alliance (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These two English football competitions both closed down at the end of last season, so templates listing the member clubs are no longer required. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominated. Lastcent (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no longer required. Giant Snowman 12:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, purely administrative. Fenix down (talk) 15:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2012 FKF Division One - Zone A et al.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Template:2012 FKF Division One - Zone A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012 FKF Division One - Zone B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012 FKF Division One (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012 Kenyan Premier League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2012 Kenyan Women's Premier League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2013 FKF Division One - Zone A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2013 FKF Division One - Zone B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2013 FKF Division One (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2013 Kenyan Premier League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2014 Kenyan National Super League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:2014 Kenyan Premier League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Extended football squad 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No content is produced when any of these templates are transcluded. They appear to have no purpose Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackmcbarn: If you paid attention you'd know the templates' documentations contain the specific templates used for each of these leagues. If someone say visits {{2014 Kenyan Premier League}} they'll see that the template itself doesn't have any content, but gives links to the specific templates used for the 2014 Kenyan Premier League. Unless I have to fill them with content saying "See documentation" or whatever I don't see why you want to delete them. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 12:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Davykamanzi: That's not what templates are for, though. Templates shouldn't exist just so that their doc page can contain links. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:53, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackmcbarn: Ok instead of deleting them, I'm gonna add {{Error}} messages to direct the user to their respective documentations. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 16:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Davykamanzi: The fact that the template was empty wasn't the problem. The problem is these templates aren't ever meant to be used as templates, which adding errors to them doesn't fix. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:42, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't get what these templates are meant to do... Giant Snowman 12:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - me neither! Surely wikitables are a much better way of getting the job done? Fenix down (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Linkin Park logo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, and I am pretty sure userboxes are still discussed at MFD? Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Linkin Park logo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:User Linkin Park (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Linkin Park logo with Template:User Linkin Park.
Template:Linkin Park logo isn't used anywhere other than in Template:User Linkin Park, and there doesn't seem to be anywhere else where it would be useful. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackmcbarn: I moved it to Template:User Linkin Park/logo since it is as you say only used in Template:User Linkin Park. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 16:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Davykamanzi: That's not what I meant. I wanted its code directly moved into Template:User Linkin Park. There's no need to have the second one at all, no matter where it is. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you cut-and-paste moved the template, which is the wrong way to do it. Now an admin has to clean it up. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:32, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackmcbarn: I don't see why it needs to be in the same place as Template:User Linkin Park. It's quite a bit of code and it has its own documentation anyway. It would be messy code-wise to put it all in the same place. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 18:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a lot of code. It's two lines. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackmcbarn: It's not only used in {{User Linkin Park}}, but also in {{User Linkin Park fanatic}}. Making it a sub-template would be a more organised manner of doing it. I moved it again anyway, this time the right way. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 19:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Davykamanzi: That wasn't the case when I made the nomination, and {{User Linkin Park}} and {{User Linkin Park fanatic}} are similar enough that they should probably be merged as well. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Skrillex logo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skrillex logo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, and I can't think of anywhere this would be useful Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CECAFA Nile Basin Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CECAFA Nile Basin Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links; see WP:NENAN Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.