Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asteriscus

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 05:13, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Asteriscus

Dictionary definition, already transwikied. Physchim62 18:23, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fish anatomy or something. R adiant _* 19:38, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
Delete altogether. Dante Alighieri | Talk 19:39, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note:Above vote is by an imposter, not the real Dante Alighieri.
  - A renaissance sock puppet! ---Isaac R 21:25, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, anatomical features are inherently notable and encyclopedic. Could be expanded to discuss function, morphology, evolution, and diversity. Kappa 00:05, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Megan1967 06:46, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep as per Kappa. --Nabla 15:45, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
Keep and expand. I am sure more could be said about this anatomical feature of a fish. It also appears to be a form of daisy according to Google. Capitalistroadster 00:00, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.