Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushes Gone Wild

Bushes Gone Wild

Non-notable spoof "article". Only 16 Google hits for "Bushes Gone Wild" none of which seem connected to this. - 23:19, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC) Lee (talk)

Keep. Notable Internet phenomenon. The Wikipedia article indicates that "Bushes Gone Wild" is a faux-news article. Crocogator 23:23, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I'm usually fairly inclusionist, but I think this crosses the line. If we keep this we might as well start writing an article on every article that's ever been published in The Onion. Delete. Mike H 00:14, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Gzornenplatz 23:25, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable. JamesMLane 01:10, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Abstain. "Bushes Gone Wild" is very much notable-- it's a well-known internet phenomenon. I'm not sure it deserves another pointer here, though. After the end of 2004, the article will be completely forgotten. It's a toss-up. 137.22.4.185 14:45, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Nonsense. Delete. Rick K 20:00, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Shave this right out of wikipedia :) --Improv 21:50, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete, if we have a Wikipedia article on every droll blog-posting, Wikipedia is going to be as big as the rest of the WWW put together. —Stormie 00:38, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]] 00:40, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
Obliterate. Sheer nonsense. jni 15:30, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Barbara and Jenna Bush and leave a minor mention of it there. —siro χ o 05:59, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
Concur with Siroxo. Redirect to Barbara and Jenna Bush. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 08:22, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
Delete, no redirects. —tregoweth 17:37, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I was going to speedy delete it as a prank. That's what I think it is. Geogre 14:22, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing notable here, just another lame satire. Gamaliel 20:41, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Subtrivial. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:24, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)