Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geek Stink Breath
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Geek Stink Breath)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 21:16, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopaedia article. --Neigel von Teighen 23:18, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Sure it is. Rhobite 23:32, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)
DeleteRedirect to Insomniac (album). We don't have stubs on every single song by every single artist. Is this song notable for some other reason? — Asbestos | Talk 23:35, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)- We should. Rhobite 23:37, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)
- No reason not to--The_stuart 21:59, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- ... for singles. As this was successful on the singles chart, it is reasonable to say it has notability separate from the album which it also featured on. Keep. TSP 15:31, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- No reason not to--The_stuart 21:59, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- We should. Rhobite 23:37, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)
- (note: fixed up a bit since nomination) Keep or merge with Insomniac (album), and it would be great to have articles on every hit single and otherwise popular song Kappa 23:45, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, non notable song. Megan1967 00:03, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep. #16 on the British charts scrapes in IMO. Andrewa 00:08, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, the band is encyclopedic, the song is not. Wyss 00:40, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Question for delete voters: What would be wrong with merging this content with the album page? Kappa 06:54, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Merge to album page. Nateji77 14:03, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. There is enough info here to stand alone. If not kept, should be merged with Insomnia Capitalistroadster 15:46, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- STRONG KEEP This is just as article worthy as any other song with an article. The song, while not reaching high on the charts, has become a radio standard on many "alternative" radio stations. --The_stuart 21:58, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, fits in with all the other song articles. Xezbeth 22:10, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Methinks this should go under WikiProject Albums if the song was released as a single. Or merge with the album that it was released in. --Andylkl 07:03, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. From what I understand, if the article is a substub, then it gets redirected to the album, but in this case, it's not. --Viriditas | Talk 21:28, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.