Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gu Long
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gu Long)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:25, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable vanity. --BradBeattie 15:29, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 21,500 Google hits [1] suggest notability, but it won't harm it to be deleted an re-written from scratch if that is the case. Sonic Mew | talk to me 16:46, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Has written two books, I think: [2], [3]. I can smell the germ of an article here. -Splash 19:45, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Very notable author of a major literary genre. I've just re-written the article, and even got a Taiwan Education Ministry (Global Chinese Language and Culture Center) webpage as a reference. Verifiable and encyclopedic. The Literate Engineer 21:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, and thank the editors who improved the article and helped to counter systemic bias. Kappa 23:54, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable author. Well done Literate Engineer. Capitalistroadster 02:12, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the state of the article at the moment, I switch my vote to keep. --BradBeattie 02:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, clearly notable. Nandesuka 12:27, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, article is now good enough. Punkmorten 15:46, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Chinese page linked, translation pending. We can stop the discussionm now. SYSS Mouse 22:47, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. One of the major wuxia novelists who is not merely notable but extremely influential in the Chinese-speaking world. 165.21.154.112 03:59, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.