Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Robertson
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew Robertson)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:53, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Is being married to a celebrity an indication of importance or significance? Speedy delete. --DrTorstenHenning 12:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Apparently he is/was also a presenter on (UK) Channel 4's Pet Rescue. I've added this to his page. Sliggy 13:19, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
- That should be enough by the present standards. Keep. --DrTorstenHenning 14:26, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Davina McCall - he doesn't have an imdb entry and we don't need an entry on everyone who's ever been a telly presenter. Dunc|☺ 14:50, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note, imdb is a poor resource, much more comprehensive for the US than the rest of the world. I'd suggest you don't rely on it for borderline cases. --zippedmartin 21:08, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, wikipedia should certainly aim to have entries on all major channel television presenters. Kappa 15:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I'm not thrilled with this article and the subject is only borderline notable. I tried to expand but all the google hits were about his wife and just mentioned him as her husband. Still, it's plausible that fans of Pet Rescue or Davina McCall would want to know who he is. At worst, it's harmless.--Scimitar parley 16:27, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Does not appear to meet deletion criteria. Trollderella 20:08, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hello! cruft. --zippedmartin 21:08, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Being a TV presenter is enough for notability, I think. Nandesuka 23:32, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.