Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim jew

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.

I count 7 "delete" to 9 "keep" and note that several people changed their votes following the expansion of the article. Rossami (talk) 22:20, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Muslim jew

Delete - idle speculation, dicdef at best. FreplySpang (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not encyclopedic. -- Barfooz (talk) 04:23, 24 May 2005 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, not notable dictionary definition. Megan1967 06:46, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete speculation. could be worth keeping if the article referenced the existence of actual muslim jews, but it doesnn't. Nateji77 07:56, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

change vote to Keep following cleanup. Nateji77 05:53, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lacks any useful information. Cedars 12:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - but the information needs to be expanded greatly. There are terms such as Christian Witch in regular circulation so why not have Muslim jew?Internodeuser 12:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, in severe need of cleanup. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:33, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, contradiction in terms. R adiant _* 13:48, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

i think in this case "muslim" is the individual's religion and "jew" refers to his/her ethnicity, rather than religion. Nateji77 06:59, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or rewrite including a link or redirect to Donmeh -- there really are Muslim Jews, but they're rare. Haikupoet 19:00, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Change vote to keep per Mustafaa. Vastly improved. Haikupoet 03:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the above reasons. Also, it's an orphaned article. Jacob1207 23:06, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep POV as it stands - but could make an interesting article --Doc (t) 01:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. The phenomenon certainly exists, and is certainly article-worthy, but I'm not sure this is the correct name. I've added a bit. - Mustafaa 03:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable contradictory term. JamesBurns 10:32, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but fix capitalization by moving to Muslim Jew. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:19, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Surprised that there is a VfD on this. --Irishpunktom\^talk 16:25, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Notable phenomena.Yuber^(talk) 22:59, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.