Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oappy

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 18:12, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oappy

Vanity article about an 11-yr-old self-proclaimed rock star. Obviously, this meets no criteria on WP:MUSIC, and should be deleted. Harro5 July 5, 2005 03:08 (UTC)

Delete vanity silliness. Friday 5 July 2005 03:20 (UTC)
BJAODN. Was rather funny to read, actually. -- Natalinasmpf 5 July 2005 03:26 (UTC)

I've added the contents of the article to BJAODN, but still feel the article itself should go. Not to mention we should send a message to the anon author, who has removed the VfD tag four times. Harro5 July 5, 2005 06:31 (UTC)

Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 5 July 2005 03:51 (UTC)
Delete not notable and vanity. -- BMIComp (talk) 5 July 2005 04:47 (UTC)
Delete, good that it's on BJAODN. Gerrit ^CUTEDH 5 July 2005 08:07 (UTC)
Delete as patent nonsense. His birthday doesn't even exist. - Mgm|^(talk) July 5, 2005 08:12 (UTC)
Delete ... wait, Grodember 32nd doesn't exist?! Proto t c 5 July 2005 12:46 (UTC)
Delete as a joke. BJAODN is the only place this entry belongs. -- BD2412 ^talk July 5, 2005 21:35 (UTC)
Delete kid vanity nonsense. --Etacar11 5 July 2005 23:27 (UTC)
Speedy delete as nonsense posted by a known vandal. Nothing but similar BS spewing out of this IP. - Lucky 6.9 6 July 2005 00:57 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.