Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Per kristian hansen
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Per kristian hansen)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 15:08, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
Not an automatic speedy, imo, though the link provided doesn't glean any results on a search for his name and I can't find anything about this guy from a Google search. Francs2000 | Talk 11:35, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have never heard of this humorist, and google cannot find him. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:08, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not only has this article got the trademark vanity capitalization error, but it's also a substub. I did rephrase it to a complete sentence instead of fragments. - Mgm|(talk) 14:37, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
- He is not a humorist, but a humanist. A very nn humanist, to be exact. Strong delete. Punkmorten 17:04, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn humanist vanity. --Etacar11 00:16, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. What on earth is nn? I find plenty of google hits for the name, although not in English. Secretlondon 00:26, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- nn is short for "non-notable". See WP:Importance for a fuzzy description of how something might be notable. -Splash 01:56, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm aware of notability - it was the vfd jargon I didn't recognise. Secretlondon 02:46, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- He is non-notable, and I know it. (I'm Norwegian). He is a minor staff member in the Norwegian Humanist Association. Punkmorten 11:57, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm aware of notability - it was the vfd jargon I didn't recognise. Secretlondon 02:46, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- nn is short for "non-notable". See WP:Importance for a fuzzy description of how something might be notable. -Splash 01:56, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. There is no assertion of notability. Stating someone's beliefs is not such an assertion. Anyone can (and everyone does) have beliefs ergo having some is non-notable. -Splash 01:56, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.