Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudyard griffiths

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Eugene van der Pijll 14:20, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rudyard griffiths

Looks like a vanity page. I suggest merging relavent material into a cleaned up "dominion institute". Laura Scudder | Talk 19:57, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — It probably is vanity, but he appears to be notable enough to have a page. If the dominion institute portions are excised and the remainder cleaned up, it's a working bio-stub. — RJH 15:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to "Rudyard Griffiths". He has made a name for himself, and appears in the media regularly talking about Canadian history. I think that he is distinct from the Dominion Institute, and worthy of his own article. I have copyedited the article to make it sound less canned. Ground Zero 17:59, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 04:58, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and move to Rudyard Griffiths as per Ground Zero. There should be more focus on the individual, rather than the institutions in which he is involved. Mindmatrix 11:49, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject has a real presence in Canadian media. Is this another American takedown?--Simon.Pole 04:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.