Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines

 

 

 Main Discussion Assessment Requests Members Articles
(Featured · New · Popular) Sources Portal

This is the discussion page of Tambayan Philippines, where Filipino contributors and contributors to Philippine-related articles discuss general matters regarding the development of Philippine-related articles as well as broad topics on the Philippines with respect to Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects. Likewise, this talk page also serves as the regional notice board for Wikipedia concerns regarding the Philippines, enabling other contributors to request input from Filipino Wikipedians.

Start new topic

Requested move at Talk:Filipino animation#Requested move 7 December 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Filipino animation#Requested move 7 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Feeglgeef (talk) 16:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Elliot Eastman

Hi, I'd just like to inform everyone that I've started an article stub on Elliot Eastman, the American YouTuber who was kidnapped in Zamboanga del Norte as developments on the kidnapping are now garnering both local and international media coverage. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 20:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Follow-up: Glaiza de Castro

Hi. I have been editing the article Glaiza de Castro for a while now, aiming for FA status before 2026. I have already inquired about this in the past (Archive 53/Stuck on early life...). However, I just can't ask for a peer review as there is a major cleanup template (Update, in the Acting Career section).

I am busy with school as a Grade 12 student. I have work immersion and swimming sessions in HOPE 4 next year, as well as the DOST scholarship exam and eventual application for college, so that is why I am not really able to focus on this. Those are the reasons why I need help.

Your contributions on this matter are highly appreciated. Thank you. Ramkarlo82 (talk) 16:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Colet surname

Hello! I want to bring up this discussion (on behalf of AstrooKai) I don't know if this is a controversial on the name "Maria" instead of "Ma." and cause of edit warring on the page. The thing is, on X post of Colet on December 09, 2024, Colet posted that claiming her name was "Ma." not "Maria". Although, I believe that Ma. and Maria was a different names, I don't know if in MOS:PHILNAMES too. Should we follow what Colet claiming or not?

P.S: I see on the comments section on Colet post, a fan I think that they edited here on Wikipedia the article of Colet to correct it but, i will not dropping their usernames. Royiswariii Talk! 15:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

For full context and details, see Talk:Colet (singer)#Consensus regarding Colet's first name. AstrooKai (Talk) 15:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

The nearest example here is León María Guerrero (diplomat). Borgenland (talk) 14:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

From what I understand "Ma." is most likely what is written on her legal documents. She did say that "Ma." is a shorthand for Maria and is "read" as Maria and hence being pedantic over her name by jesting "that fan doesn't know her name". But that's how I understand it. Ma. is most often times is a shorthand for Maria. But we can't based on tweets. Thats just my own personal interpretation of the posts which are not straightforward. If she does "clarify" in a reputable verifiable platform such as a live interview like in the case of Pokwang's birthday brouhahaha then good09:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Taft Avenue infobox image

I invite you all to provide input on Talk:Taft Avenue about this. Thanks.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Philippine politics task force

Is there any plan to use these categories? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

MSGJ I believe they were intended to be filled by Template:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines when the |politics=yes parameter is included, like Category:Philippine History articles by quality used to work, but the functionality for both has clearly broken. CMD (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

I have updated the template, so they should start getting used now — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Philippine-related Requested Sections

Last year, I started a discussion suggesting that we should have a page to compile requests to add to or expand existing articles outside of Tambayan PH's scope with sections or subsections that explain them in the Philippine context. For example, the article on Jaywalking and Michigan left each have a section explaining their topics in the PH context.

To compile these requests, based on @Lenticel's suggestion, I've created it as a user page, which has been linked to in Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines/Requests. Feel free to add and do any requests there (with explanation), and check in from time to time for any requests you'd like to help out with! Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 14:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

See my latest edition to Lethal injection. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Can I include articles with Philippine sections that need expansion to the requests? For example, Christmas music#Philippines needs expansion and maybe some more sources. D-Flo27 (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

That's actually the main purpose of this—to expand Philippine sections on non-Tambayan articles. AstrooKai (Talk) 14:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Naniwoofg

Naniwoofg (talk · contribs) has been making problematic "update of images" in several articles. The Taft Avenue image problem is just the tip of the iceberg; the user's talk page shows numerous messages regarding their problematic edits, many of the messages were from me. One example is their insistence on this image (claiming it as updated image of Quezon Memorial Shrine), even if the image does not properly show the sculpture as the fireworks obfuscate it and distract the intended subject of the image. They were also involved in changing Kalaw Avenue image twice (to the images that are inferior to the currently-used infobox image).

With numerous issues on images involved by this user, is it ripe to sanction this user? I'll leave the reporting of this user to WP:ANI to other users, but I hope this discussion serves as the start of multiple discussions concerning the problematic behavior of this user. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

It seems that they have published problematic edits for several months now. I checked their contributions and saw that they had dozens of reverted edits. Most were edits that replaced images with new "good" or "high" quality images. Now, I can't check them all since they amount to more than 50 revisions, but judging by how many notices there were on their talk page, I'm a bit surprised that this user is not sanctioned yet despite this. AstrooKai (Talk) 16:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Also to add, the user was involved in some attempts to use Commons images of Philippine monuments in which the monuments themselves are incidental or trivial, while at the same time removing the fair use images of the monuments (therefore risking the activation of a 1-week countdown to deletion by bots). The user does not seem to understand the reason why local and lesser quality images of such public monuments are needed, considering the Philippine law (RA 8293) not granting Freedom of Panorama of any sort for any public objects still under copyright. Example: this one concerning the Statue of the Sentinel of Freedom. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)