User:JC1/twenty-second:修订间差异
小无编辑摘要 |
小无编辑摘要 |
||
第1行: | 第1行: | ||
[[File:500kV 3-Phase Transmission Lines.png|thumb|500 kV [[三相電]] Transmission Lines at [[大古力水坝]]; four circuits are shown; two additional circuits are obscured by trees on the right; the entire 7079 MW generation capacity of the dam is accommodated by these six circuits.]] |
[[File:500kV 3-Phase Transmission Lines.png|thumb|500 kV [[三相電]] Transmission Lines at [[大古力水坝]]; four circuits are shown; two additional circuits are obscured by trees on the right; the entire 7079 MW generation capacity of the dam is accommodated by these six circuits.]] |
||
⚫ | '''輸電系統'''是指由[[發電廠]]至次級本地負載中心之間的極高壓大電能輸送過程,由負載中心轉換電壓至中高壓再輸送至客戶則為[[配電系統]],兩者相加則為[[輸電網路]],又稱為電網。自電流戰爭起,電力系統由大量獨立小型電力網絡整合為一個大型的電力輸送網絡,而發電能力亦集中至遠離民居的大型發電廠。輸電系統着重於可靠且低損耗地將大量電力作遠距離輸送,亦需要為各電網、發電與供電之間的連接作平衡。例如在{{tsl|en|wide area synchronous grid|大範圍同步電力網絡}}之中,為增加電力傳送的效率同時降低發電與輸電的成本,電力或需要跨國傳送,將輸電網絡連結亦能提升輸電系統的穩定性。 |
||
{{other uses|Electric transmission (disambiguation)}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | 通常而言,輸電網絡與配電網絡同屬一間公司,但自1990年代起不少國家發起[[電力自由化]],使部分[[電力市場]]之中輸電網絡與配電網絡未必屬於同一公司<ref name=femp01>{{cite journal|url=https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-13906.pdf|title=A Primer on Electric Utilities, Deregulation, and Restructuring of U.S. Electricity Markets|publisher=[[美國能源部]] {{tsl|en|Federal Energy Management Program|}} (FEMP)|date=2002-05|format=PDF|accessdate=2018-10-30}}</ref>。 |
||
A {{tsl|en|wide area synchronous grid|}}, also known as an "interconnection" in North America, directly connects many generators delivering AC power with the same relative ''frequency'' to many consumers. For example, there are four major interconnections in North America (the {{tsl|en|Western Interconnection|}}, the {{tsl|en|Eastern Interconnection|}}, the {{tsl|en|Quebec Interconnection|}} and the {{tsl|en|Electric Reliability Council of Texas|}} (ERCOT) grid). In Europe {{tsl|en|Synchronous grid of Continental Europe||one large grid connects most of continental Europe}}. |
|||
⚫ | |||
== 系統 == |
== 系統 == |
||
大多數輸電系統皆使用[[三相電|三相交流電]],而[[電氣化鐵路]]中則或會使用[[單相電]]。近年,輸電網絡會於長距離輸電時採用[[高壓直流輸電|高壓直流輸電技術]]以提高輸電效率。高壓直流輸電技術亦用於超越50公里長的{{tsl|en|submarine power cable|海底電䌫}}以及連接不同步的電力網絡,例如60赫茲與50赫茲之間的連接。 |
|||
Most transmission lines are high-voltage [[三相電|three-phase]] [[交流電]] (AC), although [[單相電|single phase]] AC is sometimes used in [[電氣化鐵路]]s. [[高壓直流輸電|High-voltage direct-current]] (HVDC) technology is used for greater efficiency over very long distances (typically hundreds of miles). HVDC technology is also used in {{tsl|en|submarine power cable|}}s (typically longer than 30 miles (50 km)), and in the interchange of power between grids that are not mutually synchronized. HVDC links are used to stabilize large power distribution networks where sudden new loads, or blackouts, in one part of a network can result in synchronization problems and {{tsl|en|cascading failure|}}s. |
|||
[[File:Electricity grid simple- North America.svg|thumb|400px| |
[[File:Electricity grid simple- North America.svg|thumb|400px|整個電力系統,輸電系統以藍色標示]] |
||
輸電系統採用[[高壓電]]以減少長距離輸送的能量損失。輸電網絡通常以架空電纜為輸送,因使用地底電纜會大幅提高鋪設成本,但在市區或環境敏感地帶之中仍需使用地底電纜。一直以來,電力都難以大規模儲存,使電力公司需要設計複雜的控制系統以保證消耗的電力相等於發電總電量。若需要大於電力供應又或發生故障,電力頻率將會隨之下降,此時輸電設備將自動切斷連接以保護各種設備,否則或會發生大規模[[停電]],例如[[1965年北美大停电]]、[[2003年美加大停电]]等皆為輸電系統的保護設備未起作用而起。輸電系統與其他電力網絡連接時亦能提供更高的[[冗餘]],避免某一輸電路線故障時引起某些地區無電可用之情況。 |
|||
Electricity is transmitted at [[高壓電]]s (66 kV or above) to reduce the energy loss which occurs in long-distance transmission. Power is usually transmitted through [[高压电线]]s. {{tsl|en|Undergrounding||Underground power transmission}} has a significantly higher installation cost and greater operational limitations, but reduced maintenance costs. Underground transmission is sometimes used in urban areas or environmentally sensitive locations. |
|||
⚫ | |||
A lack of electrical energy storage facilities in transmission systems leads to a key limitation. Electrical energy must be generated at the same rate at which it is consumed. A sophisticated control system is required to ensure that the [[發電]] very closely matches the demand. If the demand for power exceeds supply, the imbalance can cause generation plant(s) and transmission equipment to automatically disconnect or shut down to prevent damage. In the worst case, this may lead to a cascading series of shut downs and a major regional [[停電|blackout]]. Examples include the US Northeast blackouts of [[1965年北美大停电|1965]], {{tsl|en|New York City blackout of 1977||1977}}, [[2003年美加大停电|2003]], and major blackouts in other US regions in {{tsl|en|1996 Western North America blackouts||1996}} and {{tsl|en|2011 Southwest blackout||2011}}. Electric transmission networks are interconnected into regional, national, and even continent wide networks to reduce the risk of such a failure by providing multiple [[冗餘|redundant]], alternative routes for power to flow should such shut downs occur. Transmission companies determine the maximum reliable capacity of each line (ordinarily less than its physical or thermal limit) to ensure that spare capacity is available in the event of a failure in another part of the network. |
|||
⚫ | |||
高壓架空電纜僅使用空氣作絕緣使其成本相對地底電纜大為下降。導體絕大多數為[[铝合金]],多股導體再繞成一條電纜,電纜中間亦可能加入鋼纜以強化該電纜。鋁合金導體相對銅導體可以於略低效能的情況下大幅降低成本,鋁合金重量較低亦能減少輸電塔所需支撐的拉力,從而降低輸電塔需要的結構強度,亦能降低土木工程相關的成本。導體面積由12 mm<sup>2</sup>至750 mm<sup>2</sup>不等,視乎該輸電線路所需的{{tsl|en|current-carrying capacity|載流容量}}。較大的導體會因[[集膚效應]]使電流集中於電纜的外圍,從而降低內部導體的成本效益。故此,高壓架空電纜會分組而非合為一組大電纜以避開[[集膚效應]],這種做法同時亦能減少因[[电晕放电]]而導致的能量損失。另外,架空電纜三相的三組電纜亦需要按距離如[[雙絞線]]般交換位置以減少外界環境做成三相不平衡。 |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
[[File:High Voltage Lines in Washington State.tif|thumb|upright=0.75|left|3-phase high-voltage lines in Washington State, "Bundled" 3-ways]] |
|||
現時,輸電系統的高壓架空電纜大多為110千伏特或以上。部分僅有33或66千伏特的電力輸送線路則稱之為[[#次輸電系統|次輸電系統]],在某些情況下會以較長距離供應輕負載。而電壓為765千伏特以上的特高電壓輸電系統會有其他特殊設計,但一般仍會使用架空電纜。 |
|||
{{multiple image |
|||
|direction = vertical |
|||
⚫ | |||
|width = 225 |
|||
|image1=Electric power transmission line.JPG |
|||
|image2=Sample cross-section of high tension power (pylon) line.jpg |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
架空電纜僅依靠空氣作絕緣,故電纜之間需要留有最小安全距離。強風或低温等惡劣天氣下則有可能導致電纜隨風漂動而使電纜之間的距離低於最小安全距離,使三相之間或對地發生[[电弧]],引致設備故障或停電<ref>{{cite book |author1=Hans Dieter Betz |author2=Ulrich Schumann |author3=Pierre Laroche |title=Lightning: Principles, Instruments and Applications |date=2009 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4020-9078-3 |page=202-203 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U6lCL0CIolYC&pg=PA187&lpg=PA187&dq=Spatial+Distribution+and+Frequency+of+Thunderstorms+and+Lightning+in+Australia+wind+gust&source=bl&ots=93Eto3OuyQ&sig=nB7VACqDBK7xJDGHijfCdny7Ylw&hl=en&ei=DFkLSt2lKJCdlQeTyPjtCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3#PPA203,M1 |accessdate=2009-05-13}}</ref>。風亦能把架空電纜吹動而造成大波幅低頻率的震動,稱之為{{tsl|en|conductor gallop|電線跳動}}又或導體跳動。 |
|||
High-voltage overhead conductors are not covered by insulation. The conductor material is nearly always an [[铝]] alloy, made into several strands and possibly reinforced with steel strands. Copper was sometimes used for overhead transmission, but aluminum is lighter, yields only marginally reduced performance and costs much less. Overhead conductors are a commodity supplied by several companies worldwide. Improved conductor material and shapes are regularly used to allow increased capacity and modernize transmission circuits. Conductor sizes range from 12 mm<sup>2</sup> (#6 [[美国线规]]) to 750 mm<sup>2</sup> (1,590,000 [[圓密耳]]s area), with varying resistance and {{tsl|en|current-carrying capacity|}}. For large conductors (more than a few centimetres in diameter) at power frequency, much of the current flow is concentrated near the surface due to the [[集膚效應]]. The center part of the conductor carries little current, but contributes weight and cost to the conductor. Because of this current limitation, multiple parallel cables (called [[高压电线]]s) are used when higher capacity is needed. Bundle conductors are also used at high voltages to reduce energy loss caused by [[电晕放电]]. |
|||
⚫ | |||
Today, transmission-level voltages are usually considered to be 110 kV and above. Lower voltages, such as 66 kV and 33 kV, are usually considered {{tsl|en|||subtransmission}} voltages, but are occasionally used on long lines with light loads. Voltages less than 33 kV are usually used for [[配電系統|distribution]]. Voltages above 765 kV are considered [[高壓電|extra high voltage]] and require different designs compared to equipment used at lower voltages. |
|||
|- |
|||
| <gallery> |
|||
Since overhead transmission wires depend on air for insulation, the design of these lines requires minimum clearances to be observed to maintain safety. Adverse weather conditions, such as high winds and low temperatures, can lead to power outages. Wind speeds as low as {{convert|23|kn|km/h}} can permit conductors to encroach operating clearances, resulting in a [[电弧|flashover]] and loss of supply.<ref>Hans Dieter Betz, Ulrich Schumann, Pierre Laroche (2009). [https://books.google.com/books?id=U6lCL0CIolYC&pg=PA187&lpg=PA187&dq=Spatial+Distribution+and+Frequency+of+Thunderstorms+and+Lightning+in+Australia+wind+gust&source=bl&ots=93Eto3OuyQ&sig=nB7VACqDBK7xJDGHijfCdny7Ylw&hl=en&ei=DFkLSt2lKJCdlQeTyPjtCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3#PPA203,M1 Lightning: Principles, Instruments and Applications.] Springer, pp. 202–203. {{ISBN|978-1-4020-9078-3}}. Retrieved on 13 May 2009.</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
Oscillatory motion of the physical line can be termed {{tsl|en|conductor gallop||conductor gallop or flutter}} depending on the frequency and amplitude of oscillation. |
|||
⚫ | |||
High Voltage Lines in Washington State.tif|thumb|華盛頓州的三相高壓架空電纜,可見每相各自再分為三組]] |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
⚫ | |||
== 地底輸電 == |
|||
== Underground transmission == |
|||
{{Main| |
{{Main|管線地下化}} |
||
Electric power can also be transmitted by {{tsl|en|high-voltage cable||underground power cables}} instead of overhead power lines. Underground cables take up less right-of-way than overhead lines, have lower visibility, and are less affected by bad weather. However, costs of insulated cable and excavation are much higher than overhead construction. Faults in buried transmission lines take longer to locate and repair. |
Electric power can also be transmitted by {{tsl|en|high-voltage cable||underground power cables}} instead of overhead power lines. Underground cables take up less right-of-way than overhead lines, have lower visibility, and are less affected by bad weather. However, costs of insulated cable and excavation are much higher than overhead construction. Faults in buried transmission lines take longer to locate and repair. |
||
第307行: | 第299行: | ||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080213034400/http://www.reason.org/commentaries/kiesling_20030818b.shtml |
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080213034400/http://www.reason.org/commentaries/kiesling_20030818b.shtml |
||
| archive-date = February 13, 2008 |
| archive-date = February 13, 2008 |
||
| url-status = dead |
|||
}}</ref> and there are moves in many countries to separately regulate transmission (see [[電力市場]]). |
}}</ref> and there are moves in many countries to separately regulate transmission (see [[電力市場]]). |
||
[[西班牙]] was the first country to establish a {{tsl|en|regional transmission organization|}}. In that country, transmission operations and market operations are controlled by separate companies. The transmission system operator is [[西班牙電網公司]] (REE) and the wholesale electricity market operator is Operador del Mercado Ibérico de Energía – Polo Español, S.A. (OMEL) [https://web.archive.org/web/20040906064835/http://www.omel.es/ OMEL Holding | Omel Holding]. Spain's transmission system is interconnected with those of France, Portugal, and Morocco. |
[[西班牙]] was the first country to establish a {{tsl|en|regional transmission organization|}}. In that country, transmission operations and market operations are controlled by separate companies. The transmission system operator is [[西班牙電網公司]] (REE) and the wholesale electricity market operator is Operador del Mercado Ibérico de Energía – Polo Español, S.A. (OMEL) [https://web.archive.org/web/20040906064835/http://www.omel.es/ OMEL Holding | Omel Holding]. Spain's transmission system is interconnected with those of France, Portugal, and Morocco. |
||
The establishment of RTOs in the United States was spurred by the {{tsl|en|FERC|}}'s Order 888, ''Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities'', issued in 1996.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|title=FERC: Landmark Orders - Order No. 888|website=www.ferc.gov|access-date=December 7, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161219014712/https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|archive-date=December 19, 2016 |
The establishment of RTOs in the United States was spurred by the {{tsl|en|FERC|}}'s Order 888, ''Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities'', issued in 1996.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|title=FERC: Landmark Orders - Order No. 888|website=www.ferc.gov|access-date=December 7, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161219014712/https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|archive-date=December 19, 2016}}</ref> |
||
In the United States and parts of Canada, several electric transmission companies operate independently of generation companies, but there are still regions - the Southern United States - where vertical integration of the electric system is intact. In regions of separation, transmission owners and generation owners continue to interact with each other as market participants with voting rights within their RTO. RTOs in the United States are regulated by the {{tsl|en|Federal Energy Regulatory Commission|}}. |
In the United States and parts of Canada, several electric transmission companies operate independently of generation companies, but there are still regions - the Southern United States - where vertical integration of the electric system is intact. In regions of separation, transmission owners and generation owners continue to interact with each other as market participants with voting rights within their RTO. RTOs in the United States are regulated by the {{tsl|en|Federal Energy Regulatory Commission|}}. |
||
第318行: | 第309行: | ||
The cost of high voltage electricity transmission (as opposed to the costs of [[配電系統]]) is comparatively low, compared to all other costs arising in a consumer's electricity bill. In the UK, transmission costs are about 0.2 p per kWh compared to a delivered domestic price of around 10 p per kWh.<ref>[http://www.claverton-energy.com/what-is-the-cost-per-kwh-of-bulk-transmission-national-grid-in-the-uk-note-this-excludes-distribution-costs.html What is the cost per kWh of bulk transmission] / National Grid in the UK (note this excludes distribution costs)</ref> |
The cost of high voltage electricity transmission (as opposed to the costs of [[配電系統]]) is comparatively low, compared to all other costs arising in a consumer's electricity bill. In the UK, transmission costs are about 0.2 p per kWh compared to a delivered domestic price of around 10 p per kWh.<ref>[http://www.claverton-energy.com/what-is-the-cost-per-kwh-of-bulk-transmission-national-grid-in-the-uk-note-this-excludes-distribution-costs.html What is the cost per kWh of bulk transmission] / National Grid in the UK (note this excludes distribution costs)</ref> |
||
Research evaluates the level of capital expenditure in the electric power T&D equipment market will be worth $128.9 bn in 2011.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.visiongain.com/Report/626/The-Electric-Power-Transmission-and-Distribution-(T-D)-Equipment-Market-2011-2021 |title=The Electric Power Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Equipment Market 2011–2021 |access-date=June 4, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110618143614/http://www.visiongain.com/Report/626/The-Electric-Power-Transmission-and-Distribution-(T-D)-Equipment-Market-2011-2021 |archive-date=June 18, 2011 |
Research evaluates the level of capital expenditure in the electric power T&D equipment market will be worth $128.9 bn in 2011.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.visiongain.com/Report/626/The-Electric-Power-Transmission-and-Distribution-(T-D)-Equipment-Market-2011-2021 |title=The Electric Power Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Equipment Market 2011–2021 |access-date=June 4, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110618143614/http://www.visiongain.com/Report/626/The-Electric-Power-Transmission-and-Distribution-(T-D)-Equipment-Market-2011-2021 |archive-date=June 18, 2011 }}</ref> |
||
== Merchant transmission == |
== Merchant transmission == |
||
第334行: | 第325行: | ||
| pages = 226, 247 |
| pages = 226, 247 |
||
| isbn = 0-87814-862-0 |
| isbn = 0-87814-862-0 |
||
}}</ref> In the United States, the {{tsl|en|FERC|}}'s Order 1000, issued in 2010, attempts to reduce barriers to third party investment and creation of merchant transmission lines where a public policy need is found.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/trans-plan.asp|title=FERC: Industries - Order No. 1000 - Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation|website=www.ferc.gov|access-date=October 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181030205910/https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/trans-plan.asp|archive-date=October 30, 2018 |
}}</ref> In the United States, the {{tsl|en|FERC|}}'s Order 1000, issued in 2010, attempts to reduce barriers to third party investment and creation of merchant transmission lines where a public policy need is found.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/trans-plan.asp|title=FERC: Industries - Order No. 1000 - Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation|website=www.ferc.gov|access-date=October 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181030205910/https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/trans-plan.asp|archive-date=October 30, 2018}}</ref> |
||
== Health concerns == |
== Health concerns == |
||
第359行: | 第350行: | ||
Two of the more notable U.S. energy policies impacting electricity transmission are [[Order No. 888]] and the [[2005年能源政策法案]]. |
Two of the more notable U.S. energy policies impacting electricity transmission are [[Order No. 888]] and the [[2005年能源政策法案]]. |
||
Order No. 888 adopted by FERC on 24 April 1996, was “designed to remove impediments to competition in the wholesale bulk power marketplace and to bring more efficient, lower cost power to the Nation’s electricity consumers. The legal and policy cornerstone of these rules is to remedy undue discrimination in access to the monopoly owned transmission wires that control whether and to whom electricity can be transported in interstate commerce.”<ref name="Docket No. RM95-8-000">{{cite web|title=Order No. 888|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/rm95-8-00w.txt|publisher=United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission}}</ref> Order No. 888 required all public utilities that own, control, or operate facilities used for transmitting electric energy in interstate commerce, to have open access non-discriminatory transmission tariffs. These tariffs allow any electricity generator to utilize the already existing power lines for the transmission of the power that they generate. Order No. 888 also permits public utilities to recover the costs associated with providing their power lines as an open access service.<ref name="Docket No. RM95-8-000"/><ref name="Order No. 888">{{cite web|last1=Order No. 888|title=Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities|first1=FERC|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|access-date=December 7, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161219014712/https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|archive-date=December 19, 2016 |
Order No. 888 adopted by FERC on 24 April 1996, was “designed to remove impediments to competition in the wholesale bulk power marketplace and to bring more efficient, lower cost power to the Nation’s electricity consumers. The legal and policy cornerstone of these rules is to remedy undue discrimination in access to the monopoly owned transmission wires that control whether and to whom electricity can be transported in interstate commerce.”<ref name="Docket No. RM95-8-000">{{cite web|title=Order No. 888|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/rm95-8-00w.txt|publisher=United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission}}</ref> Order No. 888 required all public utilities that own, control, or operate facilities used for transmitting electric energy in interstate commerce, to have open access non-discriminatory transmission tariffs. These tariffs allow any electricity generator to utilize the already existing power lines for the transmission of the power that they generate. Order No. 888 also permits public utilities to recover the costs associated with providing their power lines as an open access service.<ref name="Docket No. RM95-8-000"/><ref name="Order No. 888">{{cite web|last1=Order No. 888|title=Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities|first1=FERC|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|access-date=December 7, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161219014712/https://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/land-docs/order888.asp|archive-date=December 19, 2016}}</ref> |
||
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) signed into law by congress on 8 August 2005, further expanded the federal authority of regulating power transmission. EPAct gave FERC significant new responsibilities including but not limited to the enforcement of electric transmission reliability standards and the establishment of rate incentives to encourage investment in electric transmission.<ref>{{cite book|title=Energy Policy Act of 2005 Fact Sheet|date=8 August 2006|publisher=FERC Washington, D.C.|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/fed-sta/epact-fact-sheet.pdf|access-date=December 7, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220231111/https://ferc.gov/legal/fed-sta/epact-fact-sheet.pdf|archive-date=December 20, 2016 |
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) signed into law by congress on 8 August 2005, further expanded the federal authority of regulating power transmission. EPAct gave FERC significant new responsibilities including but not limited to the enforcement of electric transmission reliability standards and the establishment of rate incentives to encourage investment in electric transmission.<ref>{{cite book|title=Energy Policy Act of 2005 Fact Sheet|date=8 August 2006|publisher=FERC Washington, D.C.|url=https://www.ferc.gov/legal/fed-sta/epact-fact-sheet.pdf|access-date=December 7, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220231111/https://ferc.gov/legal/fed-sta/epact-fact-sheet.pdf|archive-date=December 20, 2016}}</ref> |
||
Historically, local governments have exercised authority over the grid and have significant disincentives to encourage actions that would benefit states other than their own. Localities with cheap electricity have a disincentive to encourage making {{tsl|en|interstate commerce|}} in electricity trading easier, since other regions will be able to compete for local energy and drive up rates. For example, some regulators in Maine do not wish to address congestion problems because the congestion serves to keep Maine rates low.<ref name=ncep2>{{cite journal|url=http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/primer.pdf|title=Electricity Transmission: A primer|author=National Council on Electricity Policy|page=32 (page 41 in .pdf)|format=PDF|journal=|access-date=December 28, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201222708/http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/primer.pdf|archive-date=December 1, 2008 |
Historically, local governments have exercised authority over the grid and have significant disincentives to encourage actions that would benefit states other than their own. Localities with cheap electricity have a disincentive to encourage making {{tsl|en|interstate commerce|}} in electricity trading easier, since other regions will be able to compete for local energy and drive up rates. For example, some regulators in Maine do not wish to address congestion problems because the congestion serves to keep Maine rates low.<ref name=ncep2>{{cite journal|url=http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/primer.pdf|title=Electricity Transmission: A primer|author=National Council on Electricity Policy|page=32 (page 41 in .pdf)|format=PDF|journal=|access-date=December 28, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201222708/http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/primer.pdf|archive-date=December 1, 2008}}</ref> Further, vocal local constituencies can block or slow permitting by pointing to visual impact, environmental, and perceived health concerns. In the US, generation is growing four times faster than transmission, but big transmission upgrades require the coordination of multiple states, a multitude of interlocking permits, and cooperation between a significant portion of the 500 companies that own the grid. From a policy perspective, the control of the grid is [[巴尔干化]], and even former [[美國能源部長|energy secretary]] [[比尔·理查森]] refers to it as a ''third world grid''. There have been efforts in the EU and US to confront the problem. The US national security interest in significantly growing transmission capacity drove passage of the [[2005年能源政策法案|2005 energy act]] giving the Department of Energy the authority to approve transmission if states refuse to act. However, soon after the Department of Energy used its power to designate two {{tsl|en|National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor|}}s, 14 senators signed a letter stating the DOE was being too aggressive.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Wald | first = Matthew | title = Wind Energy Bumps into Power Grid’s Limits | date=27 August 2008 | page=A1 | accessdate=12 December 2008 | work=[[纽约时报]] | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/business/27grid.html?_r=2&ref=business&oref=slogin}}</ref> |
||
== Special transmission == |
== Special transmission == |
||
第375行: | 第366行: | ||
[[高溫超導]]s (HTS) promise to revolutionize power distribution by providing lossless transmission of electrical power. The development of superconductors with transition temperatures higher than the boiling point of [[液氮]] has made the concept of superconducting power lines commercially feasible, at least for high-load applications.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1109/77.920339 |author=Jacob Oestergaard |journal=IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity |title=Energy losses of superconducting power transmission cables in the grid |year=2001 |volume=11 |page=2375|display-authors=etal|url=http://orbit.dtu.dk/files/4280307/%C3%B8stergaard.pdf }}</ref> It has been estimated that the waste would be halved using this method, since the necessary refrigeration equipment would consume about half the power saved by the elimination of the majority of resistive losses. Some companies such as [[聯合愛迪生]] and {{tsl|en|American Superconductor|}} have already begun commercial production of such systems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11907-superconducting-power-line-to-shore-up-new-york-grid/|title=Superconducting power line to shore up New York grid|first=New Scientist Tech and|last=Reuters|website=New Scientist}}</ref> In one hypothetical future system called a {{tsl|en|SuperGrid|}}, the cost of cooling would be eliminated by coupling the transmission line with a liquid hydrogen pipeline. |
[[高溫超導]]s (HTS) promise to revolutionize power distribution by providing lossless transmission of electrical power. The development of superconductors with transition temperatures higher than the boiling point of [[液氮]] has made the concept of superconducting power lines commercially feasible, at least for high-load applications.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1109/77.920339 |author=Jacob Oestergaard |journal=IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity |title=Energy losses of superconducting power transmission cables in the grid |year=2001 |volume=11 |page=2375|display-authors=etal|url=http://orbit.dtu.dk/files/4280307/%C3%B8stergaard.pdf }}</ref> It has been estimated that the waste would be halved using this method, since the necessary refrigeration equipment would consume about half the power saved by the elimination of the majority of resistive losses. Some companies such as [[聯合愛迪生]] and {{tsl|en|American Superconductor|}} have already begun commercial production of such systems.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11907-superconducting-power-line-to-shore-up-new-york-grid/|title=Superconducting power line to shore up New York grid|first=New Scientist Tech and|last=Reuters|website=New Scientist}}</ref> In one hypothetical future system called a {{tsl|en|SuperGrid|}}, the cost of cooling would be eliminated by coupling the transmission line with a liquid hydrogen pipeline. |
||
Superconducting cables are particularly suited to high load density areas such as the business district of large cities, where purchase of an [[地役权]] for cables would be very costly.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.futureenergies.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=237 |title=Superconducting cables will be used to supply electricity to consumers |access-date=June 12, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714161200/http://www.futureenergies.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=237 |archive-date=July 14, 2014 |
Superconducting cables are particularly suited to high load density areas such as the business district of large cities, where purchase of an [[地役权]] for cables would be very costly.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.futureenergies.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=237 |title=Superconducting cables will be used to supply electricity to consumers |access-date=June 12, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714161200/http://www.futureenergies.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=237 |archive-date=July 14, 2014 }}</ref> |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
|+HTS transmission lines<ref>{{cite web |url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/imaging/superconductivitys-first-century/3 |title=Superconductivity's First Century |access-date=August 9, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120812011121/https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/imaging/superconductivitys-first-century/3 |archive-date=August 12, 2012 |
|+HTS transmission lines<ref>{{cite web |url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/imaging/superconductivitys-first-century/3 |title=Superconductivity's First Century |access-date=August 9, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120812011121/https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/imaging/superconductivitys-first-century/3 |archive-date=August 12, 2012 }}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Location !! Length (km) !! Voltage (kV) !! Capacity (GW) !! Date |
! Location !! Length (km) !! Voltage (kV) !! Capacity (GW) !! Date |
||
第415行: | 第406行: | ||
== 記錄 == |
== 記錄 == |
||
* Highest capacity system: 12 GW Zhundong–Wannan(准东-皖南)±1100 kV HVDC.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.e-fermat.org/files/communication/Li-COMM-ASIAEM2015-2017-Vol21-May-Jun.-017.pdf|title=Development of UHV Transmission and Insulation Technology in China|last=|first=|date=|website= |
* Highest capacity system: 12 GW Zhundong–Wannan(准东-皖南)±1100 kV HVDC.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.e-fermat.org/files/communication/Li-COMM-ASIAEM2015-2017-Vol21-May-Jun.-017.pdf|title=Development of UHV Transmission and Insulation Technology in China|last=|first=|date=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.xj.xinhuanet.com/2019-09/27/c_1125048315.htm|title=准东-皖南±1100千伏特高压直流输电工程竣工投运|last=|first=|date=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref> |
||
* Highest transmission voltage (AC): |
* Highest transmission voltage (AC): |
||
**planned: 1.20 MV (Ultra High Voltage) on Wardha-Aurangabad line ([[印度]]) - under construction. Initially will operate at 400 kV.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://tdworld.com/overhead_transmission/powergrid-research-development-201301/ |title=India Steps It Up |journal=Transmission & Distribution World | date=January 2013}}</ref> |
**planned: 1.20 MV (Ultra High Voltage) on Wardha-Aurangabad line ([[印度]]) - under construction. Initially will operate at 400 kV.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://tdworld.com/overhead_transmission/powergrid-research-development-201301/ |title=India Steps It Up |journal=Transmission & Distribution World | date=January 2013}}</ref> |
2020年8月3日 (一) 09:08的版本
輸電系統是指由發電廠至次級本地負載中心之間的極高壓大電能輸送過程,由負載中心轉換電壓至中高壓再輸送至客戶則為配電系統,兩者相加則為輸電網路,又稱為電網。自電流戰爭起,電力系統由大量獨立小型電力網絡整合為一個大型的電力輸送網絡,而發電能力亦集中至遠離民居的大型發電廠。輸電系統着重於可靠且低損耗地將大量電力作遠距離輸送,亦需要為各電網、發電與供電之間的連接作平衡。例如在大範圍同步電力網絡之中,為增加電力傳送的效率同時降低發電與輸電的成本,電力或需要跨國傳送,將輸電網絡連結亦能提升輸電系統的穩定性。
通常而言,輸電網絡與配電網絡同屬一間公司,但自1990年代起不少國家發起電力自由化,使部分電力市場之中輸電網絡與配電網絡未必屬於同一公司[1]。
系統
大多數輸電系統皆使用三相交流電,而電氣化鐵路中則或會使用單相電。近年,輸電網絡會於長距離輸電時採用高壓直流輸電技術以提高輸電效率。高壓直流輸電技術亦用於超越50公里長的海底電䌫以及連接不同步的電力網絡,例如60赫茲與50赫茲之間的連接。
輸電系統採用高壓電以減少長距離輸送的能量損失。輸電網絡通常以架空電纜為輸送,因使用地底電纜會大幅提高鋪設成本,但在市區或環境敏感地帶之中仍需使用地底電纜。一直以來,電力都難以大規模儲存,使電力公司需要設計複雜的控制系統以保證消耗的電力相等於發電總電量。若需要大於電力供應又或發生故障,電力頻率將會隨之下降,此時輸電設備將自動切斷連接以保護各種設備,否則或會發生大規模停電,例如1965年北美大停电、2003年美加大停电等皆為輸電系統的保護設備未起作用而起。輸電系統與其他電力網絡連接時亦能提供更高的冗餘,避免某一輸電路線故障時引起某些地區無電可用之情況。
架空電纜
高壓架空電纜僅使用空氣作絕緣使其成本相對地底電纜大為下降。導體絕大多數為铝合金,多股導體再繞成一條電纜,電纜中間亦可能加入鋼纜以強化該電纜。鋁合金導體相對銅導體可以於略低效能的情況下大幅降低成本,鋁合金重量較低亦能減少輸電塔所需支撐的拉力,從而降低輸電塔需要的結構強度,亦能降低土木工程相關的成本。導體面積由12 mm2至750 mm2不等,視乎該輸電線路所需的載流容量。較大的導體會因集膚效應使電流集中於電纜的外圍,從而降低內部導體的成本效益。故此,高壓架空電纜會分組而非合為一組大電纜以避開集膚效應,這種做法同時亦能減少因电晕放电而導致的能量損失。另外,架空電纜三相的三組電纜亦需要按距離如雙絞線般交換位置以減少外界環境做成三相不平衡。
現時,輸電系統的高壓架空電纜大多為110千伏特或以上。部分僅有33或66千伏特的電力輸送線路則稱之為次輸電系統,在某些情況下會以較長距離供應輕負載。而電壓為765千伏特以上的特高電壓輸電系統會有其他特殊設計,但一般仍會使用架空電纜。
架空電纜僅依靠空氣作絕緣,故電纜之間需要留有最小安全距離。強風或低温等惡劣天氣下則有可能導致電纜隨風漂動而使電纜之間的距離低於最小安全距離,使三相之間或對地發生电弧,引致設備故障或停電[2]。風亦能把架空電纜吹動而造成大波幅低頻率的震動,稱之為電線跳動又或導體跳動。
|
地底輸電
Electric power can also be transmitted by underground power cables instead of overhead power lines. Underground cables take up less right-of-way than overhead lines, have lower visibility, and are less affected by bad weather. However, costs of insulated cable and excavation are much higher than overhead construction. Faults in buried transmission lines take longer to locate and repair.
In some metropolitan areas, underground transmission cables are enclosed by metal pipe and insulated with dielectric fluid (usually an oil) that is either static or circulated via pumps. If an electric fault damages the pipe and produces a dielectric leak into the surrounding soil, liquid nitrogen trucks are mobilized to freeze portions of the pipe to enable the draining and repair of the damaged pipe location. This type of underground transmission cable can prolong the repair period and increase repair costs. The temperature of the pipe and soil are usually monitored constantly throughout the repair period.[3][4][5]
Underground lines are strictly limited by their thermal capacity, which permits less overload or re-rating than overhead lines. Long underground AC cables have significant 電容, which may reduce their ability to provide useful power to loads beyond 50英里(80公里). DC cables are not limited in length by their capacitance, however, they do require HVDC converter stations at both ends of the line to convert from DC to AC before being interconnected with the transmission network.
History
In the early days of commercial electric power, transmission of electric power at the same voltage as used by lighting and mechanical loads restricted the distance between generating plant and consumers. In 1882, generation was with 直流電 (DC), which could not easily be increased in voltage for long-distance transmission. Different classes of loads (for example, lighting, fixed motors, and traction/railway systems) required different voltages, and so used different generators and circuits.[6][7]
Due to this specialization of lines and because transmission was inefficient for low-voltage high-current circuits, generators needed to be near their loads. It seemed, at the time, that the industry would develop into what is now known as a 分散式發電 system with large numbers of small generators located near their loads.[8]
The transmission of electric power with 交流電 (AC) became possible after Lucien Gaulard and John Dixon Gibbs built what they called the secondary generator, an early transformer provided with 1:1 turn ratio and open magnetic circuit, in 1881.
The first long distance AC line was 34公里(21英里) long, built for the 1884 International Exhibition of 都灵. It was powered by a 2 kV, 130 Hz Siemens & Halske alternator and featured several Gaulard secondary generators with their primary windings connected in series, which fed incandescent lamps. The system proved the feasibility of AC electric power transmission on long distances.[7]
The very first AC system to operate was in service in 1885 in via dei Cerchi, 罗马, for public lighting. It was powered by two Siemens & Halske alternators rated 30 hp (22 kW), 2 kV at 120 Hz and used 19 km of cables and 200 parallel-connected 2 kV to 20 V step-down transformers provided with a closed magnetic circuit, one for each lamp. A few months later it was followed by the first British AC system, which was put into service at the Grosvenor Gallery, London. It also featured Siemens alternators and 2.4 kV to 100 V step-down transformers – one per user – with shunt-connected primaries.[9]
Working from what he considered an impractical Gaulard-Gibbs design, electrical engineer 威廉·史坦雷 (物理學家) developed what is considered the first practical series AC transformer in 1885.[10] Working with the support of 乔治·威斯汀豪斯, in 1886 he demonstrated a transformer based alternating current lighting system in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. Powered by a steam engine driven 500 V Siemens generator, voltage was stepped down to 100 Volts using the new Stanley transformer to power incandescent lamps at 23 businesses along main street with very little power loss over 4,000英尺(1,200米).[11] This practical demonstration of a transformer and alternating current lighting system would lead Westinghouse to begin installing AC based systems later that year.[10]
1888 saw designs for a functional 交流电动机, something these systems had lacked up till then. These were 异步电动机s running on polyphase current, independently invented by 加利莱奥·费拉里斯 and 尼古拉·特斯拉 (with Tesla's design being licensed by Westinghouse in the US). This design was further developed into the modern practical three-phase form by Mikhail Dolivo-Dobrovolsky and Charles Eugene Lancelot Brown.[12] Practical use of these types of motors would be delayed many years by development problems and the scarcity of poly-phase power systems needed to power them.[13][14]
The late 1880s and early 1890s would see the financial merger of smaller electric companies into a few larger corporations such as Ganz and AEG in Europe and 通用电气 and Westinghouse Electric in the US. These companies continued to develop AC systems but the technical difference between direct and alternating current systems would follow a much longer technical merger.[15] Due to innovation in the US and Europe, alternating current's economy of scale with very large generating plants linked to loads via long-distance transmission was slowly being combined with the ability to link it up with all of the existing systems that needed to be supplied. These included single phase AC systems, poly-phase AC systems, low voltage incandescent lighting, high voltage arc lighting, and existing DC motors in factories and street cars. In what was becoming a universal system, these technological differences were temporarily being bridged via the development of 回轉變流機s and 電動發電機s that would allow the large number of legacy systems to be connected to the AC grid.[15][16] These stopgaps would slowly be replaced as older systems were retired or upgraded.
The first transmission of single-phase alternating current using high voltage took place in Oregon in 1890 when power was delivered from a hydroelectric plant at Willamette Falls to the city of Portland 14英里(23公里) downriver.[17] The first three-phase alternating current using high voltage took place in 1891 during the international electricity exhibition in 美因河畔法兰克福. A 15 kV transmission line, approximately 175 km long, connected Lauffen on the Neckar and Frankfurt.[9][18]
Voltages used for electric power transmission increased throughout the 20th century. By 1914, fifty-five transmission systems each operating at more than 70 kV were in service. The highest voltage then used was 150 kV.[19] By allowing multiple generating plants to be interconnected over a wide area, electricity production cost was reduced. The most efficient available plants could be used to supply the varying loads during the day. Reliability was improved and capital investment cost was reduced, since stand-by generating capacity could be shared over many more customers and a wider geographic area. Remote and low-cost sources of energy, such as hydroelectric power or mine-mouth coal, could be exploited to lower energy production cost.[6][9]
The rapid industrialization in the 20th century made electrical transmission lines and grids 維生管線 items in most industrialized nations. The interconnection of local generation plants and small distribution networks was spurred by the requirements of 第一次世界大战, with large electrical generating plants built by governments to provide power to munitions factories. Later these generating plants were connected to supply civil loads through long-distance transmission.[20]
Bulk power transmission
Engineers design transmission networks to transport the energy as efficiently as possible, while at the same time taking into account the economic factors, network safety and redundancy. These networks use components such as power lines, cables, 斷路器s, switches and 变压器s. The transmission network is usually administered on a regional basis by an entity such as a regional transmission organization or transmission system operator.
Transmission efficiency is greatly improved by devices that increase the voltage (and thereby proportionately reduce the current), in the line conductors, thus allowing power to be transmitted with acceptable losses. The reduced current flowing through the line reduces the heating losses in the conductors. According to Joule's Law, energy losses are directly proportional to the square of the current. Thus, reducing the current by a factor of two will lower the energy lost to conductor resistance by a factor of four for any given size of conductor.
The optimum size of a conductor for a given voltage and current can be estimated by Kelvin's law for conductor size, which states that the size is at its optimum when the annual cost of energy wasted in the resistance is equal to the annual capital charges of providing the conductor. At times of lower interest rates, Kelvin's law indicates that thicker wires are optimal; while, when metals are expensive, thinner conductors are indicated: however, power lines are designed for long-term use, so Kelvin's law has to be used in conjunction with long-term estimates of the price of copper and aluminum as well as interest rates for capital.
The increase in voltage is achieved in AC circuits by using a step-up 变压器. HVDC systems require relatively costly conversion equipment which may be economically justified for particular projects such as submarine cables and longer distance high capacity point-to-point transmission. HVDC is necessary for the import and export of energy between grid systems that are not synchronized with each other.
A transmission grid is a network of 發電廠s, transmission lines, and substations. Energy is usually transmitted within a grid with three-phase AC. Single-phase AC is used only for distribution to end users since it is not usable for large polyphase 异步电动机s. In the 19th century, two-phase transmission was used but required either four wires or three wires with unequal currents. Higher order phase systems require more than three wires, but deliver little or no benefit.
The price of electric power station capacity is high, and electric demand is variable, so it is often cheaper to import some portion of the needed power than to generate it locally. Because loads are often regionally correlated (hot weather in the Southwest portion of the US might cause many people to use air conditioners), electric power often comes from distant sources. Because of the economic benefits of load sharing between regions, wide area transmission grids now span countries and even continents. The web of interconnections between power producers and consumers should enable power to flow, even if some links are inoperative.
The unvarying (or slowly varying over many hours) portion of the electric demand is known as the base load and is generally served by large facilities (which are more efficient due to economies of scale) with fixed costs for fuel and operation. Such facilities are nuclear, coal-fired or hydroelectric, while other energy sources such as concentrated solar thermal and 地熱能發電 have the potential to provide base load power. Renewable energy sources, such as solar photovoltaics, wind, wave, and tidal, are, due to their intermittency, not considered as supplying "base load" but will still add power to the grid. The remaining or 'peak' power demand, is supplied by 尖峰負載發電廠s, which are typically smaller, faster-responding, and higher cost sources, such as combined cycle or combustion turbine plants fueled by natural gas.
Long-distance transmission of electricity (hundreds of kilometers) is cheap and efficient, with costs of US$0.005–0.02 per kWh (compared to annual averaged large producer costs of US$0.01–0.025 per kWh, retail rates upwards of US$0.10 per kWh, and multiples of retail for instantaneous suppliers at unpredicted highest demand moments).[21] Thus distant suppliers can be cheaper than local sources (e.g., New York often buys over 1000 MW of electricity from Canada).[22] Multiple local sources (even if more expensive and infrequently used) can make the transmission grid more fault tolerant to weather and other disasters that can disconnect distant suppliers.
Long-distance transmission allows remote renewable energy resources to be used to displace fossil fuel consumption. Hydro and wind sources cannot be moved closer to populous cities, and solar costs are lowest in remote areas where local power needs are minimal. Connection costs alone can determine whether any particular renewable alternative is economically sensible. Costs can be prohibitive for transmission lines, but various proposals for massive infrastructure investment in high capacity, very long distance 超級電網 transmission networks could be recovered with modest usage fees.
Grid input
At the 發電廠s, the power is produced at a relatively low voltage between about 2.3 kV and 30 kV, depending on the size of the unit. The generator terminal voltage is then stepped up by the power station 变压器 to a higher 電壓 (115 kV to 765 kV AC, varying by the transmission system and by the country) for transmission over long distances.
In the United States, power transmission is, variously, 230 kV to 500 kV, with less than 230 kV or more than 500 kV being local exceptions.
For example, the Western System has two primary interchange voltages: 500 kV AC at 60 Hz, and ±500 kV (1,000 kV net) DC from North to South (哥倫比亞河 to 南加利福尼亞州) and Northeast to Southwest (Utah to Southern California). The 287.5 kV (Hoover to 洛杉矶 line, via 维克多维尔 (加利福尼亚州)) and 345 kV (APS line) being local standards, both of which were implemented before 500 kV became practical, and thereafter the Western System standard for long distance AC power transmission.
Losses
Transmitting electricity at high voltage reduces the fraction of energy lost to resistance, which varies depending on the specific conductors, the current flowing, and the length of the transmission line. For example, a 100 mi(160 km) span at 765 kV carrying 1000 MW of power can have losses of 1.1% to 0.5%. A 345 kV line carrying the same load across the same distance has losses of 4.2%.[23] For a given amount of power, a higher voltage reduces the current and thus the 焦耳加热es in the conductor. For example, raising the voltage by a factor of 10 reduces the current by a corresponding factor of 10 and therefore the losses by a factor of 100, provided the same sized conductors are used in both cases. Even if the conductor size (cross-sectional area) is decreased ten-fold to match the lower current, the losses are still reduced ten-fold. Long-distance transmission is typically done with overhead lines at voltages of 115 to 1,200 kV. At extremely high voltages, more than 2,000 kV exists between conductor and ground, 电晕放电 losses are so large that they can offset the lower resistive losses in the line conductors. Measures to reduce corona losses include conductors having larger diameters; often hollow to save weight,[24] or bundles of two or more conductors.
Factors that affect the resistance, and thus loss, of conductors used in transmission and distribution lines include temperature, spiraling, and the 集膚效應. The resistance of a conductor increases with its temperature. Temperature changes in electric power lines can have a significant effect on power losses in the line. Spiraling, which refers to the way stranded conductors spiral about the center, also contributes to increases in conductor resistance. The skin effect causes the effective resistance of a conductor to increase at higher alternating current frequencies. Corona and resistive losses can be estimated using a mathematical model.[25]
Transmission and distribution losses in the USA were estimated at 6.6% in 1997,[26] 6.5% in 2007[26] and 5% from 2013 to 2019.[27] In general, losses are estimated from the discrepancy between power produced (as reported by power plants) and power sold to the end customers; the difference between what is produced and what is consumed constitute transmission and distribution losses, assuming no utility theft occurs.
As of 1980, the longest cost-effective distance for direct-current transmission was determined to be 7,000公里(4,300英里). For 交流電 it was 4,000公里(2,500英里), though all transmission lines in use today are substantially shorter than this.[21]
In any alternating current transmission line, the 电感 and capacitance of the conductors can be significant. Currents that flow solely in ‘reaction’ to these properties of the circuit, (which together with the resistance define the impedance) constitute 交流电功率 flow, which transmits no ‘real’ power to the load. These reactive currents, however, are very real and cause extra heating losses in the transmission circuit. The ratio of 'real' power (transmitted to the load) to 'apparent' power (the product of a circuit's voltage and current, without reference to phase angle) is the 功率因数. As reactive current increases, the reactive power increases and the power factor decreases. For transmission systems with low power factor, losses are higher than for systems with high power factor. Utilities add capacitor banks, reactors and other components (such as phase-shifting transformers; static VAR compensators; and flexible AC transmission systems, FACTS) throughout the system help to compensate for the reactive power flow, reduce the losses in power transmission and stabilize system voltages. These measures are collectively called 'reactive support'.
Transposition
Current flowing through transmission lines induces a magnetic field that surrounds the lines of each phase and affects the 电感 of the surrounding conductors of other phases. The mutual inductance of the conductors is partially dependent on the physical orientation of the lines with respect to each other. Three-phase power transmission lines are conventionally strung with phases separated on different vertical levels. The mutual inductance seen by a conductor of the phase in the middle of the other two phases will be different than the inductance seen by the conductors on the top or bottom. An imbalanced inductance among the three conductors is problematic because it may result in the middle line carrying a disproportionate amount of the total power transmitted. Similarly, an imbalanced load may occur if one line is consistently closest to the ground and operating at a lower impedance. Because of this phenomenon, conductors must be periodically transposed along the length of the transmission line so that each phase sees equal time in each relative position to balance out the mutual inductance seen by all three phases. To accomplish this, line position is swapped at specially designed transposition towers at regular intervals along the length of the transmission line in various transposition schemes.
Subtransmission
Subtransmission is part of an electric power transmission system that runs at relatively lower voltages. It is uneconomical to connect all distribution substations to the high main transmission voltage, because the equipment is larger and more expensive. Typically, only larger substations connect with this high voltage. It is stepped down and sent to smaller substations in towns and neighborhoods. Subtransmission circuits are usually arranged in loops so that a single line failure does not cut off service to many customers for more than a short time. Loops can be "normally closed", where loss of one circuit should result in no interruption, or "normally open" where substations can switch to a backup supply. While subtransmission circuits are usually carried on overhead lines, in urban areas buried cable may be used. The lower-voltage subtransmission lines use less right-of-way and simpler structures; it is much more feasible to put them underground where needed. Higher-voltage lines require more space and are usually above-ground since putting them underground is very expensive.
There is no fixed cutoff between subtransmission and transmission, or subtransmission and distribution. The voltage ranges overlap somewhat. Voltages of 69 kV, 115 kV, and 138 kV are often used for subtransmission in North America. As power systems evolved, voltages formerly used for transmission were used for subtransmission, and subtransmission voltages became distribution voltages. Like transmission, subtransmission moves relatively large amounts of power, and like distribution, subtransmission covers an area instead of just point-to-point.[28]
Transmission grid exit
At the substations, transformers reduce the voltage to a lower level for distribution to commercial and residential users. This distribution is accomplished with a combination of sub-transmission (33 to 132 kV) and distribution (3.3 to 25 kV). Finally, at the point of use, the energy is transformed to low voltage (varying by country and customer requirements – see 家用電源列表).
Advantage of high-voltage power transmission
High-voltage power transmission allows for lesser resistive losses over long distances in the wiring. This efficiency of high voltage transmission allows for the transmission of a larger proportion of the generated power to the substations and in turn to the loads, translating to operational cost savings.
In a very simplified model, assume the 輸電網路 delivers electricity from a generator (modelled as an 电压源 with voltage , delivering a power ) to a single point of consumption, modelled by a pure resistance , when the wires are long enough to have a significant resistance .
If the resistance are simply in series without any transformer between them, the circuit acts as a 電壓分配定則, because the same current runs through the wire resistance and the powered device. As a consequence, the useful power (used at the point of consumption) is:
Assume now that a transformer converts high-voltage, low-current electricity transported by the wires into low-voltage, high-current electricity for use at the consumption point. If we suppose it is an 变压器 with a voltage ratio of (i.e., the voltage is divided by and the current is multiplied by in the secondary branch, compared to the primary branch), then the circuit is again equivalent to a voltage divider, but the transmission wires now have apparent resistance of only . The useful power is then:
For (i.e. conversion of high voltage to low voltage near the consumption point), a larger fraction of the generator's power is transmitted to the consumption point and a lesser fraction is lost to 焦耳加热.
Modeling and the transmission matrix
Oftentimes, we are only interested in the terminal characteristics of the transmission line, which are the voltage and current at the sending and receiving ends. The transmission line itself is then modeled as a "black box" and a 2 by 2 transmission matrix is used to model its behavior, as follows:
The line is assumed to be a reciprocal, symmetrical network, meaning that the receiving and sending labels can be switched with no consequence. The transmission matrix T also has the following properties:
The parameters A, B, C, and D differ depending on how the desired model handles the line's resistance (R), 电感 (L), 電容 (C), and shunt (parallel, leak) conductance G. The four main models are the short line approximation, the medium line approximation, the long line approximation (with distributed parameters), and the lossless line. In all models described, a capital letter such as R refers to the total quantity summed over the line and a lowercase letter such as c refers to the per-unit-length quantity.
Lossless line
The lossless line approximation is the least accurate model; it is often used on short lines when the inductance of the line is much greater than its resistance. For this approximation, the voltage and current are identical at the sending and receiving ends.
The characteristic impedance is pure real, which means resistive for that impedance, and it is often called surge impedance for a lossless line. When lossless line is terminated by surge impedance, there is no voltage drop. Though the phase angles of voltage and current are rotated, the magnitudes of voltage and current remain constant along the length of the line. For load > SIL, the voltage will drop from sending end and the line will “consume” VARs. For load < SIL, the voltage will increase from sending end, and the line will “generate” VARs.
Short line
The short line approximation is normally used for lines less than 80 km (50 mi) long. For a short line, only a series impedance Z is considered, while C and G are ignored. The final result is that A = D = 1 per unit, B = Z Ohms, and C = 0. The associated transition matrix for this approximation is therefore:
Medium line
The medium line approximation is used for lines between 80-250 km (50-150 mi) long. In this model, the series impedance and the shunt (current leak) conductance are considered, with half of the shunt conductance being placed at each end of the line. This circuit is often referred to as a “nominal π (pi)” circuit because of the shape (π) that is taken on when leak conductance is placed on both sides of the circuit diagram. The analysis of the medium line brings one to the following result:
Counterintuitive behaviors of medium-length transmission lines:
- voltage rise at no load or small current (Ferranti effect)
- receiving-end current can exceed sending-end current
Long line
The long line model is used when a higher degree of accuracy is needed or when the line under consideration is more than 250 km (150 mi) long. Series resistance and shunt conductance are considered as distributed parameters, meaning each differential length of the line has a corresponding differential resistance and shunt admittance. The following result can be applied at any point along the transmission line, where is the propagation constant.
To find the voltage and current at the end of the long line, should be replaced with (the line length) in all parameters of the transmission matrix.
(For the full development of this model, see the 电报员方程.)
High-voltage direct current
High-voltage direct current (HVDC) is used to transmit large amounts of power over long distances or for interconnections between asynchronous grids. When electrical energy is to be transmitted over very long distances, the power lost in AC transmission becomes appreciable and it is less expensive to use 直流電 instead of 交流電. For a very long transmission line, these lower losses (and reduced construction cost of a DC line) can offset the additional cost of the required converter stations at each end.
HVDC is also used for long submarine cables where AC cannot be used because of the cable capacitance.[29] In these cases special high-voltage cables for DC are used. Submarine HVDC systems are often used to connect the electricity grids of islands, for example, between 大不列顛島 and 歐洲大陸, between Great Britain and 爱尔兰岛, between 塔斯馬尼亞州 and the 澳大利亚n mainland, between the North and South Islands of 新西兰, between 新泽西州 and 纽约, and between New Jersey and 長島. Submarine connections up to 600公里(370英里) in length are presently in use.[30]
HVDC links can be used to control problems in the grid with AC electricity flow. The power transmitted by an AC line increases as the phase angle between source end voltage and destination ends increases, but too large a phase angle will allow the systems at either end of the line to fall out of step. Since the power flow in a DC link is controlled independently of the phases of the AC networks at either end of the link, this phase angle limit does not exist, and a DC link is always able to transfer its full rated power. A DC link therefore stabilizes the AC grid at either end, since power flow and phase angle can then be controlled independently.
As an example, to adjust the flow of AC power on a hypothetical line between 西雅圖 and 波士顿 would require adjustment of the relative phase of the two regional electrical grids. This is an everyday occurrence in AC systems, but one that can become disrupted when AC system components fail and place unexpected loads on the remaining working grid system. With an HVDC line instead, such an interconnection would:
- Convert AC in Seattle into HVDC;
- Use HVDC for the 3,000英里(4,800公里) of cross-country transmission; and
- Convert the HVDC to locally synchronized AC in Boston,
(and possibly in other cooperating cities along the transmission route). Such a system could be less prone to failure if parts of it were suddenly shut down. One example of a long DC transmission line is the Pacific DC Intertie located in the Western 美国.
Capacity
The amount of power that can be sent over a transmission line is limited. The origins of the limits vary depending on the length of the line. For a short line, the heating of conductors due to line losses sets a thermal limit. If too much current is drawn, conductors may sag too close to the ground, or conductors and equipment may be damaged by overheating. For intermediate-length lines on the order of 100公里(62英里), the limit is set by the voltage drop in the line. For longer AC lines, system stability sets the limit to the power that can be transferred. Approximately, the power flowing over an AC line is proportional to the cosine of the phase angle of the voltage and current at the receiving and transmitting ends. This angle varies depending on system loading and generation. It is undesirable for the angle to approach 90 degrees, as the power flowing decreases but the resistive losses remain. Very approximately, the allowable product of line length and maximum load is proportional to the square of the system voltage. Series capacitors or phase-shifting transformers are used on long lines to improve stability. High-voltage direct current lines are restricted only by thermal and voltage drop limits, since the phase angle is not material to their operation.
Up to now, it has been almost impossible to foresee the temperature distribution along the cable route, so that the maximum applicable current load was usually set as a compromise between understanding of operation conditions and risk minimization. The availability of industrial distributed temperature sensing (DTS) systems that measure in real time temperatures all along the cable is a first step in monitoring the transmission system capacity. This monitoring solution is based on using passive optical fibers as temperature sensors, either integrated directly inside a high voltage cable or mounted externally on the cable insulation. A solution for overhead lines is also available. In this case the optical fiber is integrated into the core of a phase wire of overhead transmission lines (OPPC). The integrated Dynamic Cable Rating (DCR) or also called Real Time Thermal Rating (RTTR) solution enables not only to continuously monitor the temperature of a high voltage cable circuit in real time, but to safely utilize the existing network capacity to its maximum. Furthermore, it provides the ability to the operator to predict the behavior of the transmission system upon major changes made to its initial operating conditions.
Control
To ensure safe and predictable operation, the components of the transmission system are controlled with generators, switches, circuit breakers and loads. The voltage, power, frequency, load factor, and reliability capabilities of the transmission system are designed to provide cost effective performance for the customers.
Load balancing
The transmission system provides for base load and peak load capability, with safety and fault tolerance margins. The peak load times vary by region largely due to the industry mix. In very hot and very cold climates home air conditioning and heating loads have an effect on the overall load. They are typically highest in the late afternoon in the hottest part of the year and in mid-mornings and mid-evenings in the coldest part of the year. This makes the power requirements vary by the season and the time of day. Distribution system designs always take the base load and the peak load into consideration.
The transmission system usually does not have a large buffering capability to match the loads with the generation. Thus generation has to be kept matched to the load, to prevent overloading failures of the generation equipment.
Multiple sources and loads can be connected to the transmission system and they must be controlled to provide orderly transfer of power. In centralized power generation, only local control of generation is necessary, and it involves synchronization of the generation units, to prevent large transients and overload conditions.
In distributed power generation the generators are geographically distributed and the process to bring them online and offline must be carefully controlled. The load control signals can either be sent on separate lines or on the power lines themselves. Voltage and frequency can be used as signalling mechanisms to balance the loads.
In voltage signaling, the variation of voltage is used to increase generation. The power added by any system increases as the line voltage decreases. This arrangement is stable in principle. Voltage-based regulation is complex to use in mesh networks, since the individual components and setpoints would need to be reconfigured every time a new generator is added to the mesh.
In frequency signaling, the generating units match the frequency of the power transmission system. In 下垂速度控制, if the frequency decreases, the power is increased. (The drop in line frequency is an indication that the increased load is causing the generators to slow down.)
風力發動機s, V2G and other locally distributed storage and generation systems can be connected to the power grid, and interact with it to improve system operation. Internationally, the trend has been a slow move from a heavily centralized power system to a decentralized power system. The main draw of locally distributed generation systems which involve a number of new and innovative solutions is that they reduce transmission losses by leading to consumption of electricity closer to where it was produced.[31]
Failure protection
Under excess load conditions, the system can be designed to fail gracefully rather than all at once. Brownouts occur when the supply power drops below the demand. Blackouts occur when the supply fails completely.
Rolling blackouts (also called load shedding) are intentionally engineered electrical power outages, used to distribute insufficient power when the demand for electricity exceeds the supply.
Communications
Operators of long transmission lines require reliable communications for control of the power grid and, often, associated generation and distribution facilities. Fault-sensing 保护继电器s at each end of the line must communicate to monitor the flow of power into and out of the protected line section so that faulted conductors or equipment can be quickly de-energized and the balance of the system restored. Protection of the transmission line from 短路s and other faults is usually so critical that common carrier telecommunications are insufficiently reliable, and in remote areas a common carrier may not be available. Communication systems associated with a transmission project may use:
Rarely, and for short distances, a utility will use pilot-wires strung along the transmission line path. Leased circuits from common carriers are not preferred since availability is not under control of the electric power transmission organization.
Transmission lines can also be used to carry data: this is called power-line carrier, or PLC. PLC signals can be easily received with a radio for the long wave range.
Optical fibers can be included in the stranded conductors of a transmission line, in the overhead shield wires. These cables are known as 複合光纜地線 (OPGW). Sometimes a standalone cable is used, all-dielectric self-supporting (ADSS) cable, attached to the transmission line cross arms.
Some jurisdictions, such as 明尼蘇達州, prohibit energy transmission companies from selling surplus communication bandwidth or acting as a telecommunications common carrier. Where the regulatory structure permits, the utility can sell capacity in extra dark fibers to a common carrier, providing another revenue stream.
Electricity market reform
Some regulators regard electric transmission to be a 自然垄断[32][33] and there are moves in many countries to separately regulate transmission (see 電力市場).
西班牙 was the first country to establish a regional transmission organization. In that country, transmission operations and market operations are controlled by separate companies. The transmission system operator is 西班牙電網公司 (REE) and the wholesale electricity market operator is Operador del Mercado Ibérico de Energía – Polo Español, S.A. (OMEL) OMEL Holding | Omel Holding. Spain's transmission system is interconnected with those of France, Portugal, and Morocco.
The establishment of RTOs in the United States was spurred by the FERC's Order 888, Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities, issued in 1996.[34] In the United States and parts of Canada, several electric transmission companies operate independently of generation companies, but there are still regions - the Southern United States - where vertical integration of the electric system is intact. In regions of separation, transmission owners and generation owners continue to interact with each other as market participants with voting rights within their RTO. RTOs in the United States are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Cost of electric power transmission
The cost of high voltage electricity transmission (as opposed to the costs of 配電系統) is comparatively low, compared to all other costs arising in a consumer's electricity bill. In the UK, transmission costs are about 0.2 p per kWh compared to a delivered domestic price of around 10 p per kWh.[35]
Research evaluates the level of capital expenditure in the electric power T&D equipment market will be worth $128.9 bn in 2011.[36]
Merchant transmission
Merchant transmission is an arrangement where a third party constructs and operates electric transmission lines through the franchise area of an unrelated incumbent utility.
Operating merchant transmission projects in the 美国 include the Cross Sound Cable from Shoreham, New York to 纽黑文, Neptune RTS Transmission Line from Sayreville, New Jersey to New Bridge, New York, and Path 15 in California. Additional projects are in development or have been proposed throughout the United States, including the Lake Erie Connector, an underwater transmission line proposed by ITC Holdings Corp., connecting Ontario to load serving entities in the PJM Interconnection region.[37]
There is only one unregulated or market interconnector in 澳大利亚: Basslink between 塔斯馬尼亞州 and Victoria. Two DC links originally implemented as market interconnectors, Directlink and Murraylink, have been converted to regulated interconnectors. NEMMCO
A major barrier to wider adoption of merchant transmission is the difficulty in identifying who benefits from the facility so that the beneficiaries will pay the toll. Also, it is difficult for a merchant transmission line to compete when the alternative transmission lines are subsidized by incumbent utility businesses with a monopolized and regulated rate base.[38] In the United States, the FERC's Order 1000, issued in 2010, attempts to reduce barriers to third party investment and creation of merchant transmission lines where a public policy need is found.[39]
Health concerns
Some large studies, including a large study in the United States, have failed to find any link between living near power lines and developing any sickness or diseases, such as cancer. A 1997 study found that it did not matter how close one was to a power line or a sub-station, there was no increased risk of cancer or illness.[40]
The mainstream scientific evidence suggests that low-power, low-frequency, electromagnetic radiation associated with household currents and high transmission power lines does not constitute a short or long-term health hazard. Some studies, however, have found 相关s between various diseases and living or working near power lines. No adverse health effects have been substantiated for people not living close to powerlines.[41]
The New York State Public Service Commission conducted a study, documented in Opinion No. 78-13 (issued June 19, 1978), to evaluate potential health effects of electric fields. The study's case number is too old to be listed as a case number in the commission's online database, DMM, and so the original study can be difficult to find. The study chose to utilize the electric field strength that was measured at the edge of an existing (but newly built) right-of-way on a 765 kV transmission line from New York to Canada, 1.6 kV/m, as the interim standard maximum electric field at the edge of any new transmission line right-of-way built in New York State after issuance of the order. The opinion also limited the voltage of all new transmission lines built in New York to 345 kV. On September 11, 1990, after a similar study of magnetic field strengths, the NYSPSC issued their Interim Policy Statement on Magnetic Fields. This study established a magnetic field interim standard of 200 mG at the edge of the right-of-way using the winter-normal conductor rating. This later document can also be difficult to find on the NYSPSC's online database, since it predates the online database system. As a comparison with everyday items, a hair dryer or electric blanket produces a 100 mG - 500 mG magnetic field. An electric razor can produce 2.6 kV/m. Whereas electric fields can be shielded, magnetic fields cannot be shielded, but are usually minimized by optimizing the location of each phase of a circuit in cross-section.[42][43]
When a new transmission line is proposed, within the application to the applicable regulatory body (usually a public utility commission), there is often an analysis of electric and magnetic field levels at the edge of rights-of-way. These analyses are performed by a utility or by an electrical engineering consultant using modelling software. At least one state public utility commission has access to software developed by an engineer or engineers at the Bonneville Power Administration to analyze electric and magnetic fields at edge of rights-of-way for proposed transmission lines. Often, public utility commissions will not comment on any health impacts due to electric and magnetic fields and will refer information seekers to the state's affiliated department of health.
There are established biological effects for acute high level exposure to magnetic fields well above 100 µT (1 G) (1,000 mG). In a residential setting, there is "limited evidence of 致癌物質icity in humans and less than sufficient evidence for carcinogenicity in experimental animals", in particular, childhood leukemia, associated with average exposure to residential power-frequency magnetic field above 0.3 µT (3 mG) to 0.4 µT (4 mG). These levels exceed average residential power-frequency magnetic fields in homes, which are about 0.07 µT (0.7 mG) in Europe and 0.11 µT (1.1 mG) in North America.[44][45]
The Earth's natural geomagnetic field strength varies over the surface of the planet between 0.035 mT and 0.07 mT (35 µT - 70 µT or 350 mG - 700 mG) while the International Standard for the continuous exposure limit is set at 40 mT (400,000 mG or 400 G) for the general public.[44]
Tree Growth Regulator and Herbicide Control Methods may be used in transmission line right of ways[46] which may have health effects.
Policy by country
United States
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is the primary regulatory agency of electric power transmission and wholesale electricity sales within the United States. It was originally established by Congress in 1920 as the Federal Power Commission and has since undergone multiple name and responsibility modifications. That which is not regulated by FERC, primarily electric power distribution and the retail sale of power, is under the jurisdiction of state authority.
Two of the more notable U.S. energy policies impacting electricity transmission are Order No. 888 and the 2005年能源政策法案.
Order No. 888 adopted by FERC on 24 April 1996, was “designed to remove impediments to competition in the wholesale bulk power marketplace and to bring more efficient, lower cost power to the Nation’s electricity consumers. The legal and policy cornerstone of these rules is to remedy undue discrimination in access to the monopoly owned transmission wires that control whether and to whom electricity can be transported in interstate commerce.”[47] Order No. 888 required all public utilities that own, control, or operate facilities used for transmitting electric energy in interstate commerce, to have open access non-discriminatory transmission tariffs. These tariffs allow any electricity generator to utilize the already existing power lines for the transmission of the power that they generate. Order No. 888 also permits public utilities to recover the costs associated with providing their power lines as an open access service.[47][48]
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) signed into law by congress on 8 August 2005, further expanded the federal authority of regulating power transmission. EPAct gave FERC significant new responsibilities including but not limited to the enforcement of electric transmission reliability standards and the establishment of rate incentives to encourage investment in electric transmission.[49]
Historically, local governments have exercised authority over the grid and have significant disincentives to encourage actions that would benefit states other than their own. Localities with cheap electricity have a disincentive to encourage making interstate commerce in electricity trading easier, since other regions will be able to compete for local energy and drive up rates. For example, some regulators in Maine do not wish to address congestion problems because the congestion serves to keep Maine rates low.[50] Further, vocal local constituencies can block or slow permitting by pointing to visual impact, environmental, and perceived health concerns. In the US, generation is growing four times faster than transmission, but big transmission upgrades require the coordination of multiple states, a multitude of interlocking permits, and cooperation between a significant portion of the 500 companies that own the grid. From a policy perspective, the control of the grid is 巴尔干化, and even former energy secretary 比尔·理查森 refers to it as a third world grid. There have been efforts in the EU and US to confront the problem. The US national security interest in significantly growing transmission capacity drove passage of the 2005 energy act giving the Department of Energy the authority to approve transmission if states refuse to act. However, soon after the Department of Energy used its power to designate two National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors, 14 senators signed a letter stating the DOE was being too aggressive.[51]
Special transmission
Grids for railways
In some countries where 電力機車s or 電聯車s run on low frequency AC power, there are separate single phase traction power networks operated by the railways. Prime examples are countries in Europe (including 奥地利, 德国 and 瑞士) which utilize the older AC technology based on 16 2/3 Hz (Norway and Sweden also use this frequency but use conversion from the 50 Hz public supply; Sweden has a 16 2/3 Hz traction grid but only for part of the system).
Superconducting cables
高溫超導s (HTS) promise to revolutionize power distribution by providing lossless transmission of electrical power. The development of superconductors with transition temperatures higher than the boiling point of 液氮 has made the concept of superconducting power lines commercially feasible, at least for high-load applications.[52] It has been estimated that the waste would be halved using this method, since the necessary refrigeration equipment would consume about half the power saved by the elimination of the majority of resistive losses. Some companies such as 聯合愛迪生 and American Superconductor have already begun commercial production of such systems.[53] In one hypothetical future system called a SuperGrid, the cost of cooling would be eliminated by coupling the transmission line with a liquid hydrogen pipeline.
Superconducting cables are particularly suited to high load density areas such as the business district of large cities, where purchase of an 地役权 for cables would be very costly.[54]
Location | Length (km) | Voltage (kV) | Capacity (GW) | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carrollton, Georgia | 2000 | |||
Albany, New York[56] | 0.35 | 34.5 | 0.048 | 2006 |
Holbrook, Long Island[57] | 0.6 | 138 | 0.574 | 2008 |
Tres Amigas | 5 | Proposed 2013 | ||
Manhattan: Project Hydra | Proposed 2014 | |||
Essen, Germany[58][59] | 1 | 10 | 0.04 | 2014 |
Single wire earth return
Single-wire earth return (SWER) or single wire ground return is a single-wire transmission line for supplying single-phase electrical power for an electrical grid to remote areas at low cost. It is principally used for rural electrification, but also finds use for larger isolated loads such as water pumps. Single wire earth return is also used for HVDC over submarine power cables.
Wireless power transmission
Both 尼古拉·特斯拉 and Hidetsugu Yagi attempted to devise systems for large scale wireless power transmission in the late 1800s and early 1900s, with no commercial success.
In November 2009, LaserMotive won the NASA 2009 Power Beaming Challenge by powering a cable climber 1 km vertically using a ground-based laser transmitter. The system produced up to 1 kW of power at the receiver end. In August 2010, NASA contracted with private companies to pursue the design of laser power beaming systems to power low earth orbit satellites and to launch rockets using laser power beams.
Wireless power transmission has been studied for transmission of power from 太空太陽能s to the earth. A high power array of 微波 or laser transmitters would beam power to a rectenna. Major engineering and economic challenges face any solar power satellite project.
Security of control systems
The 美國聯邦政府 admits that the power grid is susceptible to 網絡戰.[60][61] The 美國國土安全部 works with industry to identify vulnerabilities and to help industry enhance the security of control system networks, the federal government is also working to ensure that security is built in as the U.S. develops the next generation of 'smart grid' networks.[62]
In June 2019, 俄罗斯 has conceded that it is "possible" its electrical grid is under cyber-attack by the United States.[63] The New York Times reported that American hackers from the 美國網戰司令部 planted malware potentially capable of disrupting the Russian electrical grid.[64]
記錄
- Highest capacity system: 12 GW Zhundong–Wannan(准东-皖南)±1100 kV HVDC.[65][66]
- Highest transmission voltage (AC):
- planned: 1.20 MV (Ultra High Voltage) on Wardha-Aurangabad line (印度) - under construction. Initially will operate at 400 kV.[67]
- worldwide: 1.15 MV (Ultra High Voltage) on Ekibastuz-Kokshetau line (哈萨克斯坦)
- Largest double-circuit transmission, Kita-Iwaki Powerline (日本).
- Highest towers: Yangtze River Crossing (中华人民共和国) (height: 345米或1,132英尺)
- Longest power line: Inga-Shaba (刚果民主共和国) (length: 1,700公里或1,056英里)
- Longest span of power line: 5,376米(17,638英尺) at Ameralik Span (格陵兰, 丹麦)
- Longest submarine cables:
- Longest underground cables:
- Murraylink, Riverland/Sunraysia (Australia) – (length of underground cable: 170公里或106英里)
參見
- Dynamic demand (electric power)
- Demand response
- List of energy storage projects
- Traction power network
- Backfeeding
- Conductor marking lights
- 高压电线
- Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP)
- Flexible AC transmission system (FACTS)
- Geomagnetically induced current, (GIC)
- Grid-tied electrical system
- List of high voltage underground and submarine cables
- Load profile
- National Grid (disambiguation)
- 電力線通信s (PLC)
- Power system simulation
- Radio frequency power transmission
- Wheeling (electric power transmission)
參考資料
- ^ A Primer on Electric Utilities, Deregulation, and Restructuring of U.S. Electricity Markets (PDF). 美國能源部 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). 2002-05 [2018-10-30].
- ^ Hans Dieter Betz; Ulrich Schumann; Pierre Laroche. Lightning: Principles, Instruments and Applications. Springer. 2009: 202-203 [2009-05-13]. ISBN 978-1-4020-9078-3.
- ^ Banerjee, Neela. AFTER THE ATTACKS: THE WORKERS; Con Edison Crews Improvise as They Rewire a Truncated System. September 16, 2001 –通过NYTimes.com.
- ^ INVESTIGATION OF THE SEPTEMBER 2013 ELECTRIC OUTAGE OF A PORTION OF METRO-NORTH RAILROAD’S NEW HAVEN LINE. documents.dps.ny.gov. 2014 [2019-12-29].
- ^ NYSPSC case no. 13-E-0529
- ^ 6.0 6.1 Thomas P. Hughes. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1993: 119–122. ISBN 0-8018-4614-5.
- ^ 7.0 7.1 Guarnieri, M. The Beginning of Electric Energy Transmission: Part One. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. 2013, 7 (1): 57–60. doi:10.1109/MIE.2012.2236484.
- ^ National Council on Electricity Policy. Electricity Transmission: A primer (PDF). [September 17, 2019].
- ^ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Guarnieri, M. The Beginning of Electric Energy Transmission: Part Two. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. 2013, 7 (2): 52–59. doi:10.1109/MIE.2013.2256297.
- ^ 10.0 10.1 Great Barrington Experiment. edisontechcenter.org.
- ^ William Stanley - Engineering and Technology History Wiki. ethw.org.
- ^ Arnold Heertje, Mark Perlman Evolving Technology and Market Structure: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics, page 138
- ^ Carlson, W. Bernard (2013). Tesla: Inventor of the Electrical Age. Princeton University Press. ISBN 1-4008-4655-2, page 130
- ^ Jonnes, Jill (2004). Empires of Light: Edison, Tesla, Westinghouse, and the Race to Electrify the World. Random House Trade Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0-375-75884-3, page 161.
- ^ 15.0 15.1 Parke Hughes, Thomas. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. JHU Press. 1993: 120–121.
- ^ Garud, Raghu; Kumaraswamy, Arun; Langlois, Richard. Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations. John Wiley & Sons. 2009: 249.
- ^ Argersinger, R.E. Electric Transmission of Power. General Electric Review. 1915, XVIII: 454.
- ^ Kiessling F, Nefzger P, Nolasco JF, Kaintzyk U. (2003). Overhead power lines. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, p. 5
- ^ Bureau of Census data reprinted in Hughes, pp. 282–283
- ^ Hughes, pp. 293–295
- ^ 21.0 21.1 Paris, L.; Zini, G.; Valtorta, M.; Manzoni, G.; Invernizzi, A.; De Franco, N.; Vian, A. Present Limits of Very Long Distance Transmission Systems (PDF). CIGRE International Conference on Large High Voltage Electric Systems, 1984 Session, 29 August – 6 September. Global Energy Network Institute. 1984 [29 March 2011]. 4.98 MB
- ^ NYISO Zone Maps. New York Independent System Operator. [10 January 2014].
- ^ American Electric Power, Transmission Facts, page 4: https://web.archive.org/web/20110604181007/https://www.aep.com/about/transmission/docs/transmission-facts.pdf
- ^ California Public Utilities Commission Corona and induced currents
- ^ Curt Harting. AC Transmission Line Losses. 史丹佛大學. October 24, 2010 [June 10, 2019].
- ^ 26.0 26.1 Where can I find data on electricity transmission and distribution losses?. Frequently Asked Questions – Electricity. 美国能源信息署. 19 November 2009 [29 March 2011].[永久失效連結]
- ^ How much electricity is lost in electricity transmission and distribution in the United States?. Frequently Asked Questions – Electricity. 美国能源信息署. 9 January 2019 [27 February 2019].
- ^ Donald G. Fink and H. Wayne Beaty. (2007), Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers (15th Edition). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-144146-9 section 18.5
- ^ Donald G. Fink, H. Wayne Beatty, Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers 11th Edition, McGraw Hill, 1978, ISBN 0-07-020974-X, pages 15-57 and 15-58
- ^ Guarnieri, M. The Alternating Evolution of DC Power Transmission. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. 2013, 7 (3): 60–63. doi:10.1109/MIE.2013.2272238.
- ^ The Bumpy Road to Energy Deregulation. EnPowered. 2016-03-28.
- ^ Raghuvir Srinivasan. Power transmission business is a natural monopoly. The Hindu Business Line. The Hindu. August 15, 2004 [January 31, 2008].
- ^ Lynne Kiesling. Rethink the Natural Monopoly Justification of Electricity Regulation. Reason Foundation. 18 August 2003 [31 January 2008]. (原始内容存档于February 13, 2008).
- ^ FERC: Landmark Orders - Order No. 888. www.ferc.gov. [December 7, 2016]. (原始内容存档于December 19, 2016).
- ^ What is the cost per kWh of bulk transmission / National Grid in the UK (note this excludes distribution costs)
- ^ The Electric Power Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Equipment Market 2011–2021. [June 4, 2011]. (原始内容存档于June 18, 2011).
- ^ How ITC Holdings plans to connect PJM demand with Ontario's rich renewables, Utility Dive, 8 Dec 2014, http://www.utilitydive.com/news/how-itc-holdings-plans-to-connect-pjm-demand-with-ontarios-rich-renewables/341524/
- ^ Fiona Woolf. Global Transmission Expansion. Pennwell Books. February 2003: 226, 247. ISBN 0-87814-862-0.
- ^ FERC: Industries - Order No. 1000 - Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation. www.ferc.gov. [October 30, 2018]. (原始内容存档于October 30, 2018).
- ^ Power Lines and Cancer 互联网档案馆的存檔,存档日期April 17, 2011,., The Health Report / ABC Science - Broadcast on 7 June 1997 (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
- ^ Electromagnetic fields and public health, 世界卫生组织
- ^ EMF Report for the CHPE. TRC: 1–4. March 2010 [November 9, 2018].
- ^ Electric and Magnetic Field Strengths (PDF). Transpower New Zealand Ltd: 2. [November 9, 2018].
- ^ 44.0 44.1 Electromagnetic fields and public health. Fact sheet No. 322. 世界卫生组织. June 2007 [23 January 2008].
- ^ Electric and Magnetic Fields Associated with the Use of Power (PDF). National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. June 2002 [29 January 2008].
- ^ Transmission Vegetation Management NERC Standard FAC-003-2 Technical Reference Page 14/50. http://www.nerc.com/docs/standards/sar/FAC-003-2_White_Paper_2009Sept9.pdf
- ^ 47.0 47.1 Order No. 888. United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
- ^ Order No. 888, FERC. Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities. [December 7, 2016]. (原始内容存档于December 19, 2016).
- ^ Energy Policy Act of 2005 Fact Sheet (PDF). FERC Washington, D.C. 8 August 2006 [December 7, 2016]. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于December 20, 2016).
- ^ National Council on Electricity Policy. Electricity Transmission: A primer (PDF): 32 (page 41 in .pdf). [December 28, 2008]. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于December 1, 2008).
- ^ Wald, Matthew. Wind Energy Bumps into Power Grid’s Limits. 纽约时报. 27 August 2008: A1 [12 December 2008].
- ^ Jacob Oestergaard; et al. Energy losses of superconducting power transmission cables in the grid (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 2001, 11: 2375. doi:10.1109/77.920339.
- ^ Reuters, New Scientist Tech and. Superconducting power line to shore up New York grid. New Scientist.
- ^ Superconducting cables will be used to supply electricity to consumers. [June 12, 2014]. (原始内容存档于July 14, 2014).
- ^ Superconductivity's First Century. [August 9, 2012]. (原始内容存档于August 12, 2012).
- ^ HTS Transmission Cable. www.superpower-inc.com.
- ^ IBM100 - High-Temperature Superconductors. www-03.ibm.com. August 10, 2017.
- ^ Patel, 03/01/2012 | Sonal. High-Temperature Superconductor Technology Stepped Up. POWER Magazine. March 1, 2012.
- ^ Operation of longest superconducting cable worldwide started. phys.org.
- ^ Spies 'infiltrate US power grid'. April 9, 2009 –通过news.bbc.co.uk.
- ^ Hackers reportedly have embedded code in power grid - CNN.com. www.cnn.com.
- ^ UPDATE 2-US concerned power grid vulnerable to cyber-attack. April 8, 2009 –通过in.reuters.com.
- ^ US and Russia clash over power grid 'hack attacks. BBC News. 18 June 2019.
- ^ How Not To Prevent a Cyberwar With Russia. Wired. 18 June 2019.
- ^ Development of UHV Transmission and Insulation Technology in China (PDF).
- ^ 准东-皖南±1100千伏特高压直流输电工程竣工投运.
- ^ India Steps It Up. Transmission & Distribution World. January 2013.
伸延閱讀
- Grigsby, L. L., et al. The Electric Power Engineering Handbook. USA: CRC Press. (2001). ISBN 0-8493-8578-4
- Hughes, Thomas P., Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1983 ISBN 0-8018-2873-2, an excellent overview of development during the first 50 years of commercial electric power
- Reilly, Helen. Connecting the Country – New Zealand’s National Grid 1886–2007. Wellington: Steele Roberts. 2008: 376 pages. ISBN 978-1-877448-40-9.
- Pansini, Anthony J, E.E., P.E. undergrounding electric lines. USA Hayden Book Co, 1978. ISBN 0-8104-0827-9
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation, "Electric power transmission patents; Tesla polyphase system". (Transmission of power; polyphase system; Tesla patents)
- The Physics of Everyday Stuff - Transmission Lines