Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erysimum hieracifolium: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Erysimum hieracifolium: reply to Estopedist1 (CD)
Erysimum hieracifolium: Closed as redirect (XFDcloser)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Erysimum hieracifolium]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''redirect''' to [[Erysimum odoratum]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 11:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
===[[:Erysimum hieracifolium]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Erysimum hieracifolium}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erysimum hieracifolium|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 6#{{anchorencode:Erysimum hieracifolium}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|1=Erysimum hieracifolium}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erysimum hieracifolium|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 6#{{anchorencode:Erysimum hieracifolium}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 10: Line 15:
: Good catch! I have no objections for deleting. Solution per [[user:1234qwer1234qwer4]] --[[User:Estopedist1|Estopedist1]] ([[User talk:Estopedist1|talk]]) 16:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
: Good catch! I have no objections for deleting. Solution per [[user:1234qwer1234qwer4]] --[[User:Estopedist1|Estopedist1]] ([[User talk:Estopedist1|talk]]) 16:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
::Well, redirecting to [[Erysimum odoratum]] seems to be appropriate as a {{t|R from alternative scientific name}}. <span style="display:inline-block;text-align:center;vertical-align:bottom;line-height:0.5em;">~~<nowiki/>~~<br/><span style="font-size:0.7em;">[[User:1234qwer1234qwer4]] ([[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|talk]])</span></span> 18:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
::Well, redirecting to [[Erysimum odoratum]] seems to be appropriate as a {{t|R from alternative scientific name}}. <span style="display:inline-block;text-align:center;vertical-align:bottom;line-height:0.5em;">~~<nowiki/>~~<br/><span style="font-size:0.7em;">[[User:1234qwer1234qwer4]] ([[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|talk]])</span></span> 18:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
::: convert to redirects --[[User:Awkwafaba|awkwafaba]] ([[User talk:Awkwafaba|📥]]) 14:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
::::Per [https://www.ipni.org/?page=10&q=erysimum IPNI] there are 5 ''[[Erysimum hieraciifolium]]''s (note the "ii" version already redirects to ''E. odoratum''). Linnaeus originally spelled it with a single "i" (see BHL link at IPNI), and his name has priority. Seems reasonable to redirect the "i" version to ''E. odoratum'', but I'm not sure whether it is better to tag as an alternative scientific name or as a misspelling. [[User:Plantdrew|Plantdrew]] ([[User talk:Plantdrew|talk]]) 02:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
* {{A note|Info}} - '''Note to closer for soft deletion''': This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for [[WP:NOQUORUM|lack of quorum]]. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for [[WP:SOFTDELETE|soft deletion]]''' at the end of its 7-day listing.
: '''Logs''': <code>2021-02 {{color|blue|✍️}} create</code>
: --[[User:Cewbot|Cewbot]] ([[User talk:Cewbot|talk]]) 00:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 11:52, 14 November 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Erysimum odoratum. Sandstein 11:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Erysimum hieracifolium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These taxonomic synonyms are spelt differently, so the potential ambiguity is better resolved with a hatnote. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
16:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch! I have no objections for deleting. Solution per user:1234qwer1234qwer4 --Estopedist1 (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, redirecting to Erysimum odoratum seems to be appropriate as a {{R from alternative scientific name}}. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
18:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
convert to redirects --awkwafaba (📥) 14:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per IPNI there are 5 Erysimum hieraciifoliums (note the "ii" version already redirects to E. odoratum). Linnaeus originally spelled it with a single "i" (see BHL link at IPNI), and his name has priority. Seems reasonable to redirect the "i" version to E. odoratum, but I'm not sure whether it is better to tag as an alternative scientific name or as a misspelling. Plantdrew (talk) 02:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
Logs: 2021-02 ✍️ create
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.