Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erysimum hieracifolium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Erysimum odoratum. Sandstein 11:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Erysimum hieracifolium

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These taxonomic synonyms are spelt differently, so the potential ambiguity is better resolved with a hatnote. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch! I have no objections for deleting. Solution per user:1234qwer1234qwer4 --Estopedist1 (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, redirecting to Erysimum odoratum seems to be appropriate as a {{R from alternative scientific name}}. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

convert to redirects --awkwafaba (📥) 14:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per IPNI there are 5 Erysimum hieraciifoliums (note the "ii" version already redirects to E. odoratum). Linnaeus originally spelled it with a single "i" (see BHL link at IPNI), and his name has priority. Seems reasonable to redirect the "i" version to E. odoratum, but I'm not sure whether it is better to tag as an alternative scientific name or as a misspelling. Plantdrew (talk) 02:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.

Logs: 2021-02 ✍️ create

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.