Jump to content

User talk:The Anome/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:The Anome) (bot
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 322: Line 322:
I am in awe of your efforts to empty the cesspool and polish the remaining contents. If you achieve it I will stand by my comment. I have eaten humble pie before and will do so as often as necessary. [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 19:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
I am in awe of your efforts to empty the cesspool and polish the remaining contents. If you achieve it I will stand by my comment. I have eaten humble pie before and will do so as often as necessary. [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 19:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)


:{{ping|Timtrent}} Thanks! I hope that [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Men_Going_Their_Own_Way&oldid=697475409 this revision] might be a reasonable starting point from which further progress can be made. There are certainly a reasonable number of mainstream news [[WP:RS]] out there, and there's probably academic coverage by now, but I haven't looked for that yet. It's a pity that Daubney's story is behind a paywall: despite all of its other issues, the <i>Sunday Times<i>' investigative journalism is usually pretty good. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Timtrent}} Thanks! I hope that [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Men_Going_Their_Own_Way&oldid=697475409 this revision] might be a reasonable starting point from which further progress can be made. There are certainly a reasonable number of mainstream news [[WP:RS]] out there, and there's probably academic coverage by now, but I haven't looked for that yet. It's a pity that Daubney's story is behind a paywall: despite all of its other issues, the <i>Sunday Times</i>' investigative journalism is usually pretty good. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 19:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)


::I think it stands a chance. At present I am too critical of the ''topic'' to be able to view the words in an unbiased manner. Would you mind drawing my attention to it tomorrow, please? I will fulfil my promise to review my opinion then. [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 19:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
::I think it stands a chance. At present I am too critical of the ''topic'' to be able to view the words in an unbiased manner. Would you mind drawing my attention to it tomorrow, please? I will fulfil my promise to review my opinion then. [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 19:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Line 339: Line 339:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your efforts on that minefield of an article. Although I now believe the article will inevitably be either a pro-MGTOW manifesto or a significantly shorter anti-MGTOW hit piece, I applaud your hard work. Have a great new years! [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 16:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your efforts on that minefield of an article. Although I now believe the article will inevitably be either a pro-MGTOW manifesto or a significantly shorter anti-MGTOW hit piece, I applaud your hard work. Have a great new years! [[User:Reyk|<span style="color:maroon;">'''Reyk'''</span>]] [[User talk:Reyk|'''<sub style="color:blue;">YO!</sub>''']] 16:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
|}
|}


== Happy New Year, The Anome! ==
== Happy New Year, The Anome! ==
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;{{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!--
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);<!--
-->" class="plainlinks">[[File:Fuochi d'artificio.gif|left|212px]][[File:Happy new year 01.svg|180px|right]]
-->" class="plainlinks">[[File:Fuochi d'artificio.gif|left|212px]][[File:Happy new year 01.svg|180px|right]]
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Paragraph break}}
Line 404: Line 404:
== JMO ==
== JMO ==


Just my opinion but per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/BigCadFagDad this], I think the account should also be blocked as purely disruptive and talk page access blocked. These sorts of folks need to have no way of demanding attention. But that's my opinion, I'll defer to your judgement. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 00:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Just my opinion but per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/BigCadFagDad this], I think the account should also be blocked as purely disruptive and talk page access blocked. These sorts of folks need to have no way of demanding attention. But that's my opinion, I'll defer to your judgement. [[User:Montanabw|<span style="color:#006600;">Montanabw</span>]][[User talk:Montanabw|<sup style="color:purple;">(talk)</sup>]] 00:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


:{{ping|Montanabw}} Thanks for the heads-up. I've now changed the block to indefinite with talk page blocked, and removed their contributions. They are clearly [[WP:NOTHERE]] to build the encyclopedia. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 07:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Montanabw}} Thanks for the heads-up. I've now changed the block to indefinite with talk page blocked, and removed their contributions. They are clearly [[WP:NOTHERE]] to build the encyclopedia. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 07:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Line 794: Line 794:
==Talkback==
==Talkback==
{{talkback|User talk:We knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians|ts=10:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)}}
{{talkback|User talk:We knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians|ts=10:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)}}
Additional comment added there. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 10:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Additional comment added there. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 10:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


== [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Tech/News/2016/11|Tech News: 2016-11]] ==
== [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Tech/News/2016/11|Tech News: 2016-11]] ==
Line 1,022: Line 1,022:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[{{TALKPAGENAME:JANOG}}|the article's talk page]].
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[{{TALKPAGENAME:JANOG}}|the article's talk page]].


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 11:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 11:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


:{{ping|Piotrus}} {{fixed}} by adding cites to meet [[WP:GNG]]. See article talk page. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Piotrus}} {{fixed}} by adding cites to meet [[WP:GNG]]. See article talk page. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 12:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Line 1,075: Line 1,075:
</div></div> <section end="technews-2016-W18"/> 20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
</div></div> <section end="technews-2016-W18"/> 20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=15574414 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=15574414 -->

=="Coor"==
To answer the question posed in [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Westmead_Institute_for_Medical_Research&curid=27706044&diff=718503065&oldid=718502658 this] edit summary, apparently Infobox laboratory (which is what [[Template:Infobox research institute]] redirects to) is modeled on Infobox university, and "coor" is the name of the field in that template. I've never been able to figure out why different infobox templates use "coordinates" and "coords" and "coor". [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 23:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
:Different people wrote different templates, and didn't cross-check each others' work. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 23:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
::Thanks. This is a tricky one. Perhaps Wikidata integration could help here? -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome#top|talk]]) 15:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:31, 20 March 2022

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 10

Coord missing: Second Battle of the Hook

Hi, how was this determined? --Redrose64 (talk) 11:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure. With the categories currently given for the article, it should not have been tagged. The bot does not consider "involving" to be the same thing as "in", and even if it did, it would see both the UK and China listed, and would have rejected a direct association of the article with either. I will have to investigate further. -- The Anome (talk) 12:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
I wondered if it was an uninitialised string, left holding a value from an earlier edit - but the previous one was United States, so that's not it. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
I now remember what it was -- alas, it was my error; an earlier version of the code didn't properly check for word boundaries, and did confuse "involved" with "in", because it started with the letters "in". A change to the relevant regexp fixed this some time ago, and I then tracked down what I believed to be all the incorrect edits and fixed them by hand. It seems I missed at least one. -- The Anome (talk) 19:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

The IP is obviously same pattern as Special:Contributions/71.166.99.78 (who has been blocked in 31 hours). 123.136.112.56 (talk) 13:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocking 71.166.96.0/20 to cover both of these. -- The Anome (talk) 15:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Insulated glazing

I just wanted to let you know that I removed the nomination you just made to RFD. It's actually a duplicate of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 10#Sextupleglazed glasses. I felt bad because I'm sure you put some effort into it, but please leave your comments there! Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Thanks for letting me know. Please don't feel bad about deleting my unwitting duplicate RfD -- what matters is that the job gets done, no matter who does it. Kind regards, -- The Anome (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Doppelganger

Wow, I just blocked a new user who I thought was you... [8] -- Fuzheado | Talk 20:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

@Fuzheado: I just spotted them: they seem to have done this just a moment earlier on the same article with the same MO: a near-miss copy of another editor's name, together with a copy of the user's user and talk pages. Thanks for blocking them. I've extended their block to cover editing their talk page. -- The Anome (talk) 20:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
I saw the vandal's username and thought the same thing. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent comments

I hope you don't mind, but I've moved your comments at Talk:Skyfall#Straw poll: billion vs millions to a better location where it will be seen when consensus is later determined. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ebola/west africa

thanks for the help/edits,,,its incredible, every time one thinks its over it (Ebola) pops up again, I doubt west Africa will get its "42 days countdown" (all countries included) for another 6 months...IMO--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Noticeboard Religious harassment, Bias, and Violating NPOV Censorship by Admins

Information icon There is currently a discussion at noticeboard of discussion regarding Religious harassment, Bias, and Violating NPOV Censorship by Admins. The thread is Censorship of religious phrases and words in usernames and abuse by administrators.The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ILOVESATAN666 (talkcontribs) 05:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I see you're having fun with this. -- The Anome (talk) 09:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Mrwallace05 new users

New users, NickiMinaj4life and 86.133.178.209 are obviously abusing accounts of Mrwallace05. 123.136.111.59 (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

17:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Courtship disorder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtship disorder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtship disorder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — James Cantor (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

It seems entirely plausible that DK Whitey is a real name, as Whitey does appear to exist as a surname (there's even a "Whitey's Ice Cream" out there). So unless there's any problematic editing I don't see a justification for maintaining the block. Would you be agreeable to an unblock? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Will do. -- The Anome (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Great, thanks. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment on Galassi's talk page.

I see that you are an administrator. I went to WP:RPP earlier to ask for the article to be protected, and found that another editor had asked for semi-protection. As I wrote there, I think registered editors have been the problem recently and full protection would be more appropriate. Would you mind taking a look at WP:RPP#Blood libel? Thank you. 66.87.115.251 (talk) 19:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

I've just cut the Gordian knot by removing the quote entirely. It's not usual for us to quote entire sentences from other encyclopedias. and it looks peculiar here. Hopefully, you and the other editors involved can now sort out your differences in some other way that doesn't involve relying on the exact wording used by the Britannica. -- The Anome (talk) 19:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand the problem with the Britannica quote, and I don't believe I've been involved in these reverts. Is removing the section the best option? I'm not sure, but I wish people would turn down the heat a little and discuss rather than revert. Thanks for keeping an eye out, though. Dave Dial (talk) 19:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
It seemed like the simplest thing to do without being seen to take sides. In any case, we should be sourcing our material from multiple WP:RS, not another encyclopedia, and certainly not quoting the Britannica verbatim without extraordinarily good reason. -- The Anome (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
You're probably right. I did try to get editors to realize the mistake of removing a word from a quote, as it seems as if all the registered editors did not seem to bother to look at what was being removed or why, just that an ip restored it. In any case, thanks again. Dave Dial (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you both. Most registered editors should read WP:IPs are human too every once in a while. 66.87.115.251 (talk) 20:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #6—2015

Read this in another languageSubscription list

Did you know?

A new, simpler system for editing will offer a single Edit button. Once the page has opened, you can switch back and forth between visual and wikitext editing.

Screenshot showing a pop-up dialog for switching from the wikitext editor to VisualEditor
If you prefer having separate edit buttons, then you can set that option in your preferences, either in a pop-up dialog the next time you open the visual editor, or by going to Special:Preferences and choosing the setting that you want:
Screenshot showing a drop-down menu in Special:Preferences

The current plan is for the default setting to have the Edit button open the editing environment you used most recently.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs and expanded the mathematics formula tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for languages such as Japanese and Arabic, and providing rich-media tools for formulæ, charts, galleries and uploading.

Recent improvements

You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing.

The LaTeX mathematics formula editor has been significantly expanded. (T118616) You can see the formula as you change the LaTeX code. You can click buttons to insert the correct LaTeX code for many symbols.

Future changes

The single edit tab project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab, like the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as a cookie for logged-out users and as an account preference for logged-in editors. Logged-in editors will be able to set a default editor in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences in the drop-down menu about "Editing mode:".

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the following Wikipedias in early 2016: Amharic, Buginese, Min Dong, Cree, Manx, Hakka, Armenian, Georgian, Pontic, Serbo-Croatian, Tigrinya, Mingrelian, Zhuang, and Min Nan. (T116523) Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. The developers would like to know how well it works. Please tell them what kind of computer, web browser, and keyboard you are using.

In 2016, the feedback pages for the visual editor on many Wikipedias will be redirected to mediawiki.org. (T92661)

Testing opportunities

  • Please try the new system for the single edit tab on test2.wikipedia.org. You can edit while logged out to see how it works for logged-out editors, or you can create a separate account to be able to set your account's preferences. Please share your thoughts about the single edit tab system at the feedback topic on mediawiki.org or sign up for formal user research (type "single edit tab" in the question about other areas you're interested in). The new system has not been finalized, and your feedback can affect the outcome. The team particularly wants your thoughts about the options in Special:Preferences. The current choices in Special:Preferences are:
    • Remember my last editor,
    • Always give me the visual editor if possible, 
    • Always give me the source editor, and 
    • Show me both editor tabs.  (This is the current state for people using the visual editor. None of these options will be visible if you have disabled the visual editor in your preferences at that wiki.)
  • Can you read and type in Korean or Japanese? Language engineer David Chan needs people who know which tools people use to type in some languages. If you speak Japanese or Korean, you can help him test support for these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help, and report it on Phabricator (Korean - Japanese) or on Wikipedia (Korean - Japanese).

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

Whatamidoing (WMF), 00:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Digon (disambiguation)

The article Digon (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:TWODABS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring on Russian Roulette (song). Can you please block him/her? 115.164.189.113 (talk) 13:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

I'd check this IP's contribs. They're shopping... SQLQuery me! 08:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi

If you find time for it, please let your bot take a look at the article Gökskulla. Thank you.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I've now linked it to the Swedish Wikipedia article sv:Gökskulla, which has coordinates. The coordinates should be imported from Wikidata in the next Wikidata import run, which should be sometime next week. -- The Anome (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I know you have

I am in awe of your efforts to empty the cesspool and polish the remaining contents. If you achieve it I will stand by my comment. I have eaten humble pie before and will do so as often as necessary. Fiddle Faddle 19:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@Timtrent: Thanks! I hope that this revision might be a reasonable starting point from which further progress can be made. There are certainly a reasonable number of mainstream news WP:RS out there, and there's probably academic coverage by now, but I haven't looked for that yet. It's a pity that Daubney's story is behind a paywall: despite all of its other issues, the Sunday Times' investigative journalism is usually pretty good. -- The Anome (talk) 19:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
I think it stands a chance. At present I am too critical of the topic to be able to view the words in an unbiased manner. Would you mind drawing my attention to it tomorrow, please? I will fulfil my promise to review my opinion then. Fiddle Faddle 19:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tim. I know what you mean about the topic. It is, alas, a real thing, and meets the notability criteria. Rigorous application of NPOV is the best way to deal with this kind of topic. -- The Anome (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
I think you are doing a great job. You must have the keys to the turd polish cupboard! I do hope you are wearing good gloves. I shall sleep on it (not the turd, nor the polish) and see what a mess the potential claque makes of it after you go to sleep Fiddle Faddle 20:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Well, I never predicted this. I did, however, predict that a claque would arrive. I'm not really awake yet in terms of reviewing my opinion, but I do know that this topic area seems to attract more unusual people than I want to deal with. Fiddle Faddle 07:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I have kept my promise. Fiddle Faddle 10:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
For your efforts on that minefield of an article. Although I now believe the article will inevitably be either a pro-MGTOW manifesto or a significantly shorter anti-MGTOW hit piece, I applaud your hard work. Have a great new years! Reyk YO! 16:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, The Anome!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Landing Zone 1

You may be interested in a discussion on Talk:Landing Zone 1 re an article move you recently completed. Another editor expressed some concern, and I've weighed in. I think you might want to as well. Cheers. N2e (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Great cleanup

Thank you for the clean-up at Men Going Their Own Way. Sancho 04:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Request for your feedback, on an AE regarding ECIG Articles.

Hello, you are a recent editor of Electronic Cigarettes, I am asking for your input to an Arbitration Enforcement Request AE. Found here. If you have time I would appreciate your input. The items in question are listed out 1-8. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Mystery_Wolff
Thank you Mystery Wolff (talk) 03:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

hi

do you know how to change the map on Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa so that it will show Liberia is Ebola free, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@Ozzie10aaaa: yes: but it looks like other people have made the necessary changes already. -- The Anome (talk) 10:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

JMO

Just my opinion but per this, I think the account should also be blocked as purely disruptive and talk page access blocked. These sorts of folks need to have no way of demanding attention. But that's my opinion, I'll defer to your judgement. Montanabw(talk) 00:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

@Montanabw: Thanks for the heads-up. I've now changed the block to indefinite with talk page blocked, and removed their contributions. They are clearly WP:NOTHERE to build the encyclopedia. -- The Anome (talk) 07:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

17:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Uhm P9

Before you move the page boldly, you should check talk page etc. No consensus. prokaryotes (talk) 14:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Planet_Nine_(2016_hypothesis)#Another_move prokaryotes (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

16:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Geodata adding

Hi! Currently just a question - could you do a one-time run at another Wikipedia with The Anomebot2 for adding {{coord}}? --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 23:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

@Edgars2007: I'd be happy to. I would need to be granted bot permissions by the admins there, and, before that, to have a native speaker of that language help me with getting the proposed changes approved by that Wikipedia's community before I start. Please tell me more... -- The Anome (talk) 01:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
OK, as the initial answer is yes, we can talk further :) You don't have to worry about bot flag and such things, you would just need to run the bot. So the Wikipedia I'm interested in, is Latvian Wikipedia, we have some 65tk articles, so it won't be some very very big job. We have the same {{coord}} as enwiki does, template placement is also the same. I have some few questions:
  1. Which articles will be affected? Does the bot go through some specific category and its subcategories or through the whole Wikipedia? The second option I think woulld be completely fine.
  2. What is the source? Wikidata, other Wikipedias (if yes, then which - all or some specific?)... What else?
You can surely make some 20-30 test edits without bot flag. Then give me some time to discuss things with colleagues (one or few days), and if everything will be fine (I'm sure, it will be fine), then you can do complete run. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 07:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
@Edgars2007: Yes, Wikidata would be the source for these, and all of the coordinates would be marked "source:wikidata" to ease eventual integration with live sourcing of coordinates from Wikidata, something which still looks to be a couple of years off. I have a process to mine coordinates directly from databases like GNIS and GNS by cross-correlating them with the English Wikipedia category tree structure, but that has years of domain-specific hacks and heuristics in it, and would take too much work to adapt to the Latvian Wikipedia. The Wikidata database contains all, or almost all, of these, and also contains coordinates from other language Wikipedias: the overall quality of the Wikidata data is reasonably good. I believe the Latvian Wikipedia currently has 8881 articles with coordinates on Wikidata (lv:Kategorija:Koordinātas Vikidatos) and 916 without (lv:Kategorija:Koordinātas, kas nav Vikidatos), and a quick pass over the current Wikidata dump shows a total of 12674 entries which have both lvwiki articles and coordinates. Unless there are a large number of lvwiki articles with coordinates which have not yet been copied to Wikidata, the suggests that around 3000 articles remain to be geocoded using my bot -- which is really no problem at all to do.
However, I'll still need to do a bit of language-specific work. There are a few types of pages for which it's inappropriate for the bot to add coordinates to, such as redirects, disambiguation pages, and list articles. I also try to filter out articles on companies, people and other living things, extraterrestrial bodies, and long linear features like roads. Most of these checks are done at runtime, by inspecting article content: I'll need to see how many of these are easy to port to Latvian. -- The Anome (talk) 12:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
One of main reasons, why I'm asking your bot to do this: I'm trying to add coordinates at lvwiki articles, which are quite local (buildings, churches in Latvia etc.) and coords are not in Wikidata, and later ask WD bots to import them all. And I want to do less work - not adding coordinates, which can be added from other Wikipedias etc :) But yes, you can add coordinates from Wikidata first. Then we can see, what can be done more, right?
Adding data from databases is not so important. Adding them here for objects in Latvia at enwiki would be completely fine (then they can be imported to Wikidata, and then - to lvwiki :D ).
But if I would give you a list of coordinates, that could be added at Latvian Wikipedia? In such format: "article [separator] lat [separator] lon"? That also could work?
About language work (I'm lowercasing all search strings):
  • redirects would contain "redirect" in page content (the same thing as at enwiki)
  • disambigs would have {{disambig}} or {{nozīmju atdalīšana}}
  • list articles would be a little bit harder. They could have category "%zskaitījum%" (% are wildcards)
  • companies - hmm... also not so easy. They could have infobox "uzņēmuma infokaste" (or "uzņēmuma infokaste v2") or "infobox company"
  • people - also not so easy. They could have category "%dzimušie%"
    • taxons have "biotakso" infobox
But actually, you don't have to worry so much about false positives. I can later check and remove them with AWB, if needed.
Looks good? --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 12:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. That's exactly the information I wanted, and yes, if this works, we need not stop with Wikidata -- I can accept lists of coordinates in any format, provided that they are in compliance with Wikipedia's content policies. I'll work on this later this weekend. -- The Anome (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Yes, sure. When you're ready, then you can make those test edits. Thanks. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 13:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Because of off-wiki commitments, this is probably going to slip to Wednesday/Thursday now. But I haven't forgotten you. -- The Anome (talk) 10:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
OK. I have a strategy. I'm going to just do some very simple missing/redirect/disambig/coordinates-already-there live checks on the lv: article at edit, and try to do the person/company/taxon etc. checks via Wikidata, something I've been looking at as a possibility for some time. While this will take a bit of time to write, test and debug, it should mean that the code will be much more portable for use with other languages in the future. -- The Anome (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

AnomeBot2 made a geodata mistake on Panopticons

Hi - this edit to Panopticons is incorrect. The article describes a collection of artworks each of which has different geolocations. Somehow your bot decided to take one of these geolocations and "promote" it to the status of being the geolocation for "Panopticons" itself, which is a mistake. (This mistake has led to a downstream error, where the wikidata entry has the "spuriously exact" coordinate, which causes errors when trying to match Wikidata up against other data sources (in this case, OpenStreetMap).) I'll reverse that edit. Please could you check that your bot won't make similar mistakes in other cases? All the best.--mcld (talk) 14:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting that. This should have been caught by the existing blocking heuristics, but since it clearly wasn't, I'll check to see if they can be improved. -- The Anome (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
@Mcld: I've now added another rule to the bot to catch the particular set of coincidences that allowed that edit to go through. Thanks for the feedback.

If you're matching OpenStreetMap data up with Wikipedia's coordinates, I'd be very interested in hearing about what you're doing and how you're doing it. Wikipedia <-> OSM integration is the missing link in all of our geolocation work here, but AFAIK no-one's really found the right way to do it yet, because of the impedance mismatch between our conceptual model of the world and OSM's, problems with identifier stability, and difficulties with license compatibility. -- The Anome (talk) 10:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I've also removed the claim on Wikidata, see https://www.wikidata.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Q7131478&action=history -- The Anome (talk) 10:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for updating your bot! The OSM<->Wikidata matching is not my work, but it's the work of another user on OpenStreetMap's UK mailing list. See the discussion here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-January/018328.html -- --mcld (talk) 20:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Higgs boson closing

Not an expert on the issue here, but shouldn't the RFC template be removed from the section in Talk:Higgs_boson#if_energy_and_mass_are_equal.2C_higgs_bosons_would_be_the_opposite_of_light? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I didn't remove it because I wanted the RfC process to run its course: the header has now been removed after the RfC was closed. -- The Anome (talk) 10:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Ta

Just to say thanks for deleting things coming up at RfD. Can't do a WP thank for ém cos, er, they're deleted, but it is noticed. Si Trew (talk) 23:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know that I recreated Whiten as a disambiguation. This was probably a case where deletion was inappropriate. While it might not have made sense at Mark Whiten, it was an {{R from surname}} with a hatnote to Whitening (disambiguation). I found a couple more uses, so disambiguation would almost certainly be the result at RFD. Just be careful in the future, Neelix G6's are only for "snow delete" cases and this one wasn't one of them. Anyway, I echo Si Trew's comments above for the rest of your deletions. Cheers, -- Tavix (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks -- I should have spotted that, I'll take a closer look next time. -- The Anome (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

zika virus

Anome, i saw you moved my full ref from the section replacing my crossref in the lede. The reason I do it reveresely is because

  • the lede gets rewritten more often.
  • I hate the refs in the lede! it is a disease, that makes editing real hard.

Alas, realizing that I am in the minority though and those abstract-browsing sheep of readers flag ordinary statements in teh lede with "ref needed" arrrgh!, I compromise, and crossref extraordinary claims (like this new, 3 d old one).... --Wuerzele (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC) kudos to being one of the 400 most active WP editors! (little me 4617)--Wuerzele (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Food markets has been nominated for discussion

Category:Food markets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 09:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Edit filter false positive at Climate of the Philippines

Please look at this edit filter hit, which appears to have been caused by this edit filter change, and respond to this report. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Please deal with this; the anonymous user is impatient. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi -- I've disabled the blocking on the filter for now. I hope this helps. -- The Anome (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #1—2016

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?
Among experienced editors, the visual editor's table editing is one of the most popular features.
Screenshot showing a pop-up menu for column operations in a table
If you select the top of a column or the end of a row, you can quickly insert and remove columns and rows.

Now, you can also rearrange columns and rows. Click "Move before" or "Move after" to swap the column or row with its neighbor.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Indic, and Han scripts, and improving the single edit tab interface.

Recent changes

You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing. This function is available to nearly all editors at most wikis except the Wiktionaries and Wikisources.

Many local feedback pages for the visual editor have been redirected to mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.

You can now re-arrange columns and rows in tables, as well as copying a row, column or any other selection of cells and pasting it in a new location.

The formula editor has two options: you can choose "Quick edit" to see and change only the LaTeX code, or "Edit" to use the full tool. The full tool offers immediate preview and an extensive list of symbols.

Future changes

The single edit tab project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. This is similar to the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as an account preference for logged-in editors, and as a cookie for logged-out users. Logged-in editors will have these options in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences:

  • Remember my last editor,
  • Always give me the visual editor if possible,
  • Always give me the source editor, and
  • Show me both editor tabs.  (This is the state for people using the visual editor now.)

The visual editor uses the same search engine as Special:Search to find links and files. This search will get better at detecting typos and spelling mistakes soon. These improvements to search will appear in the visual editor as well.

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at most "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers would like to know how well the visual editor works in your language. They particularly want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect the following languages: Japanese, Korean, Urdu, Persian, Arabic, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Hindi, Bengali, Assamese, Thai, Aramaic and others.

Let's work together

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thanks!

Whatamidoing (WMF) 17:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Solar System navbox templates

I noticed your recent edits to Template:Solar System table and I'd like to point you to Template:Solar System which is more actively maintained and is used on a vast majority of relevant pages to this topic. In fact I found a few pages that were using Template:Solar System table and switched them to Template:Solar System just now. Feel free to add missing information there if you think there's a need. — JFG talk 03:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! -- The Anome (talk) 20:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, The Anome. You have new messages at We knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians's talk page.
Message added 10:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Additional comment added there. North America1000 10:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

hi

sorry to bother, but apparently I'm not too handy changing the map at West African Ebola virus epidemic to all clear (Sierra Leone), can you help, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

  • BTW I did fix it, but I think its too small--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
    • I've taken a look, and the SVG looks fine to me. I'll have a go at scaling it up in the infobox. -- The Anome (talk) 11:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
    • I've now enlarged the image to 350px wide by altering the width parameter in the infobox. Something in the 350px to 400px range is probably a good compromise between making the image too small to discern detail in on higher-resolution displays, and becoming too wide when displayed in small browser windows. 300px is definitely too small, and 500px definitely too large. I'd prefer to err on the smaller side, because readers can easily zoom in on the image by clicking it, regardless of size. -- The Anome (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

on a side note, theres no end to this[120]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Digon (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digon (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digon (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sloppy seconds (sexual practice) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sloppy seconds (sexual practice) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloppy seconds (sexual practice) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Unarmed combat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unarmed combat. Since you had some involvement with the Unarmed combat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 19:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Pantywaist (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 08:40, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Help

I want to know the correct population of the village Dukli. There are two values given in the article. --கி.மூர்த்தி (talk) 12:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Do you want one Edit tab, or two? It's your choice

How to switch between editing environments
Part of the toolbar in the visual editor
Click the [[ ]] to switch to the wikitext editor.
Part of the toolbar in the wikitext editor
Click the pencil icon to switch to the visual editor.

The editing interface will be changed soon. When that happens, editors who currently see two editing tabs – "Edit" and "Edit source" – will start seeing one edit tab instead. The single edit tab has been popular at other Wikipedias. When this is deployed here, you may be offered the opportunity to choose your preferred appearance and behavior the next time you click the Edit button. You will also be able to change your settings in the Editing section of Special:Preferences.

You can choose one or two edit tabs. If you chose one edit tab, then you can switch between the two editing environments by clicking the buttons in the toolbar (shown in the screenshots). See Help:VisualEditor/User guide#Switching between the visual and wikitext editors for more information and screenshots.

There is more information about this interface change at mw:VisualEditor/Single edit tab. If you have questions, suggestions, or problems to report, then please leave a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) 19:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

20:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Anomebot2

I reverted an edit by The Anomebot2, adding coordinates to Sovereign state. The edit made little sense, I *think* it came from seeing a generic world map and adding coordinates for the virtual center. You might want to reconsider whether the bot should add coordinates for that kind of case. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. You're right, that edit is definitely wrong, and should not have been made. I'll take a look at how it happened. -- The Anome (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Coords from wikidata

Hi, just noticed this fairly nonsensical addition of coords. I didn't revert it, since it seems like it should be addressed upstream at wikidata first, and I'm not really familiar enough with how things work there to do that. If you are, and if your bot is likely to encounter more of the same, you may be interested in looking into it. The coords were apparently scraped from a geocoded image appearing in the article (en and de). I have no idea what the frequency of that kind of overzealousness is on that project, could just be a one-off glitch. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Ah. Perhaps that's also what might have been going on with the other article, which I was completely baffled by. I will investigate. -- The Anome (talk) 22:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Coord missing

WP:GEO says, I discover, that coordinates shouldn't be added to articles about e.g. works of art, but Anomebot2 has added one a coord missing tag to Lenormant Athena, which almost led me to add coords to the article; does it have a sub-routine for detecting articles that shouldn't have coords and if so why didn't it work here? If, as I imagine, some false positives are inevitable, couldn't either the bot page or the template page state that these will happen and that the template can then be removed - those of us who aren't involved in the project don't necessarily know. Best, 07:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, it does have a method to exclude moveable works of art, but makes an exception for outdoor sculptures, which are covered under the "other than permanent statues or murals" clause in WP:GEO. In this case, it should have detected that it's an indoor sculpture (because of the presence of the word "museum" in the article together with the article being categorized as a sculpture), but didn't. (On inspection, I realize I should also filter for the word "statuette", which also implies movability.) I will take a look at the code, and fix it. -- The Anome (talk) 08:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 Fixed, I hope. -- The Anome (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JANOG

The article JANOG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

@Piotrus:  Fixed by adding cites to meet WP:GNG. See article talk page. -- The Anome (talk) 12:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

"Coor"

To answer the question posed in this edit summary, apparently Infobox laboratory (which is what Template:Infobox research institute redirects to) is modeled on Infobox university, and "coor" is the name of the field in that template. I've never been able to figure out why different infobox templates use "coordinates" and "coords" and "coor". Deor (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Different people wrote different templates, and didn't cross-check each others' work. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. This is a tricky one. Perhaps Wikidata integration could help here? -- The Anome (talk) 15:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)