User:The Anomebot2
This user account is a bot operated by The Anome (talk). It is used to make repetitive automated or semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the bot policy. The bot is approved and currently active – the relevant request for approval can be seen here. Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please block it. |
The bot is back running again. I've tried to minimize disruption, but there is a good chance some systematic error patterns will return, since code changes made over more than a year have been lost. I'm going back over old comments, and see if I can find the comments and reinstate these fixes. Until then, please be forgiving; I'm making every effort to bring things back to where they were before. — The Anome (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Emergency bot shutoff button
Administrators: Use this button if the bot is malfunctioning. (direct link)
Non-administrators can a malfunctioning bot to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Note: Blocking will stop further edits: the bot will intermittently retry errors for several minutes, but should then automatically shut itself down until restarted manually; please use a ten minute block or longer to be sure of stopping it.
This bot is designed to add standardized machine-readable geodata records to relevant articles in the English-language Wikipedia, using data from GNS, GNIS, OSGB coordinates in UK articles, plaintext geodata scraped from article text, and interwiki-linked geotag data from other-language Wikipedias. -- The Anome 12:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Status
[edit]- 125,000+ geotags added to date, based on data from a variety of sources
- 102,000+ more articles identified as potentially eligible for tagging have been marked using {{coord missing}}
- 61,000+ articles reformatted from old geotag formats to use {{coord}}
- The Anome (talk) 14:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Update: As of 2009-06-12:
Recent activities
[edit]Currently backfilling a number of corner cases missed by earlier over-cautious heuristics, using:
- machine parsing of plaintext geodata found in dumps
- automatched GNS data
- interwiki-matched machine-readable geodata from other language editions
This is very laborious for the bot, as it requires the re-scanning of large numbers of false positives, and will result in only a few hundred articles being geocoded, but machine time is cheap, the re-scans are necessary in any case, and this will lay the foundations for larger systematic efforts to come later.
-- The Anome (talk) 14:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Current activity
[edit]Finishing adding a large number of {{coord missing}} tags. Almost complete. -- The Anome (talk) 23:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
To do
[edit]Geotags:
Standardize existing geotags. "coor title *" is now done, "coor *" pending.- Finish adding "coord missing" to all eligible articles.
- Ancient sites should be templatable as missing, while still blocked from being given coordinates automatically.
- Go back and use CatScan to find any remaining franchises mis-tagged as "coord missing".
Rebuild article state map from log file and other stored data.
Interwiki:
- In the absence of up-to-date Kolossus data, start using the externallink table API to live-scan non-en: Wikipedia editions for URLs in order to obtain interwiki patterns
- Use full interwiki data to regenerate fuller tags where only KML data was used for earlier tagging.
Consistency and correctness:
Use 1-degree-tile binning to look for outliersLook for misuse of coord tags for offplanet locations: report to WikiProject for fixing
Matching:
- Hierarchical matching with disambiguation by subnational entities; rejected some time ago because ineffective, but may have become possible with greater navbox systematization in last year
- Open research topic: Bayesian inference of relative locality from the link graph -- this may be an effective way of handling the above. Use places with known locations as training set.
- Properly handle undersea features and disputed territories with no applicable recognized country
- Types of places not yet keyword-matched during graph traversal:
- Casinos
- Resorts
- Historic districts [?]
- Ports and harbo[u]rs by country
Bus and some metro stations
New data sources:
- Collect lists of country-specific coordinate data
- Mine geodata from images included in articles (thanks to User:Planemad for the suggestion)
Infoboxes:
- Scan for unusual/broken parameters in infoboxes.
- Start work on standardizing infoboxes.
-- The Anome (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Forthcoming attractions
[edit]With >70,000 data points, I now have enough data to do a spatial analysis of the category tree, and to generate lists of possibly misclassified or mislocated outliers. The cleaned up bounding data could then be used as a Bayesian classifier for future work. -- The Anome 10:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- The category+link graph may be a better choice for this. -- The Anome (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Ambiguity problems
[edit]Because of severe name ambiguity problems,
- Japanese locations are now filtered out of most machine-matched geodata sets.
- Recent Canadian data has had similar problems, and is now also filtered from the output of several matching algorithms.
- Because of numerous bizarrely-formatted disambig pages which confused the matching algorithms, Polish locations are also filtered.