Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 12: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 11:17, 10 February 2023

< August 11	August 13 >

August 12

Image:NicolelANTMcycle5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Rlandmann (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr page does not indicate a Creative Commons license. Q ^{T C} 08:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Tagged as no permission --Rlandmann (talk) 19:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)~~ Deleted as blatant copyvio, one of several by this user from a variety of Flickr sources --Rlandmann (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Timegalfront.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a scan of a cd-cover, so I'm doubting it's PD. Q ^{T C} 09:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as lacking source and license data for the original image within this derivative work --Rlandmann (talk) 20:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Brinda Parika.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant copyvio of this. Asenine 10:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Brinda Parekh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Rlandmann (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced here, no PD assertion. Asenine 10:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Blatant copyvio of a blatant copyvio... --Rlandmann (talk) 20:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Powerplantmex.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Kevin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant copyvio of this, no PD at source. Asenine 10:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:The Sunpilots - landscape with logo for wikipedia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Claims permission, but no OTRS link present. Asenine 11:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:JBKiester.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

States 'free use authorized' but no OTRS. Asenine 11:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

No idea what OTRS stands for. Mrs. Kiester released this photo to accompany her biographies, as printed in her books, and alongside articles in other media. In order to accertain the availability of use, I contacted her via her email posted on her publisher site. She responded, allowing use, and sent another copy of the photo. Any further question can be directed to me on my talk page. JAGUITAR (Rawr) 14:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Hackett.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by Misza13 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No GNU/CC license at website. Asenine 11:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Jeff Coopwood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks to be a professional publicity-type shot. I can't (in a ten second search) find the same image online, but I did find this thumbnail. J Milburn (talk) 13:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have already stipulated in both the Summary and License that I am the owner of this photograph. I have also permitted its use on other websites besides Wikipedia. It has also been used on other websites with and without my permission, but as I posted it as free use, I have no problem with its additional distribution elsewhere. Are you saying that my Summary and License were somehow incomplete? If something is missing, please advise and I'll happily correct it. Thanks. X4n6 (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this as it was previously deleted for lacking copyright information. You would need to place a notice on the source page that it is released under a free license. Stifle (talk) 14:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had placed a notice on the source page that it was released under a free license. I had also done both Summary and License notices. I even specified the free use GFDL. You can also see above that I indicated that if anything was done improperly, rather than just deleting it, I would appreciate being given the opportunity to correct any deficiencies first. Notice the 12 days my request sat here without any response, before you deleted the photo with no discussion beforehand? Perhaps you missed all of this. I am still interested in restoring the photo and doing so in a manner so that I won't find myself having to do it again down the road. For a third time. As an admin, will you assist? X4n6 (talk) 07:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:11 big.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imprecise source provided. I don't read Bulgarian, but I doubt that it is licensed under GFDL- I can't see anything that looks like a GFDL notice on the site. J Milburn (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:SFK.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks very much like a publicity photo. J Milburn (talk) 14:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Baumsarg 1936.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I11 by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is dated 1936. Unlikely the uploader is the author. J Milburn (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image taken from a book printed by Curt Rabitzsch, Leipzig. I guess it is free. Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We need to know who the author of the book was, so that we can work out if he's been dead for 70 years yet. If not, this image will not be in the public domain yet. --Rlandmann (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Author of book was Gustaf Kossinna. He died 1931. Best --Weissmann (talk) 12:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Copenhagen nature- dining room 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dud source, looks like a thumbnail image from a commercial site. Probably not freely licensed. J Milburn (talk) 14:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Gep-clark-office.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Small size, no meta-data. Possibly taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Damian 666 pelon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Kevin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to hold the copyright, but I'm close to 100% certain that this is a professional promotional shot. Probably a case for speedy deletion, but I thought I'd list it here just to make sure. GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Veropedia logo.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a trademark in the image, so this is highly unlikely to be GFDL. Asenine 20:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trademark and copyright are two distinct concepts. An image can be trademarked but still freely licensed. In any case solid proof must be gived that this logo is GFDL. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 22:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:064-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has uploaded a same version (To be speedy deleted after this discssion) with other information. (s)he added a link to a external website. O sama K 22:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:DaveyBoySmith012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Lid (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has a historyof uploading copyrighted umages under public domain licenses and this seems like another likely case. Up until recently it had no source information, and even now it barely has any, appears to have been taken professionally and is of a man who has been dead for several years now. The likelihood that this is the uploaders own work is remote. — –– Lid^(Talk) 22:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should also be noted that the image description cannot possibly be true. It states that the image is of Smith at a dark match during a pay-per-view event. He is shown holding the Intercontinental Championship, which he won in the main event (not a dark match) at SummerSlam 1992. Prior to the next pay-per-view event, he was fired. This was his only reign as Intercontinental champion, so the image cannot come from another pay-per-view. I believe that this is a copyrighted image of SummerSlam 1992. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.