Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan (2004 film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Vote via XFD voting tool
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Darshan (2004 film)]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 23:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
===[[:Darshan (2004 film)]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Darshan (2004 film)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan (2004 film)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 17#{{anchorencode:Darshan (2004 film)}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1150207496/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Darshan (2004 film)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan (2004 film)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 26#{{anchorencode:Darshan (2004 film)}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1150207496/cur|edits since nomination]])
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Darshan (2004 film)}})
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Darshan (2004 film)}})
NN film [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
NN film [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|Film]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India|India]]. [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|Film]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India|India]]. [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep'''. There are not many sources covering Kannada films of the early 2000s as shown by [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annavru (2003 film)]] (which was nominated for deletion by me). Regarding the broken ''[[Deccan Herald]]'' review link, remember per [[Wikipedia:V]], {{tq|Do not reject reliable sources just because they are difficult or costly to access. Some reliable sources are not easily accessible}}. All sources presented are coverage of the film, not passing mentions. {{Ping|Kataariveera}}{{ping|Kailash29792}} Please share your opinion. [[User:DareshMohan|DareshMohan]] ([[User talk:DareshMohan|talk]]) 22:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. There are not many sources covering Kannada films of the early 2000s as shown by [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annavru (2003 film)]] (which was nominated for deletion by me). Regarding the broken ''[[Deccan Herald]]'' review link, remember per [[Wikipedia:V]], {{tq|Do not reject reliable sources just because they are difficult or costly to access. Some reliable sources are not easily accessible}}. Most sources presented are coverage of the film, not [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/regional/movie-details/news-interviews/third-time-lucky/articleshow/4435960.cms passing mentions] (like [https://www.deccanherald.com/national/navneet-and-ravi-rana-chanting-hymns-chasing-controversies-1105332.html this]). {{Ping|Kataariveera}}{{ping|Kailash29792}} Please share your opinion. [[User:DareshMohan|DareshMohan]] ([[User talk:DareshMohan|talk]]) 22:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
*:Please see [[WP:TOI]]. The Times of India is not regarded as a [[WP:RS]]. - [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 11:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
:::Its not that clear cut, it is between no consensus and unreliable and during the RSN discussion it was not refuted that non-controversial content such as film reviews were still acceptable, imv [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 22:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
* '''Keep''': It could benefit from just a few more sources added. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Kailash29792|<b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b>]] [[User talk:Kailash29792|<span style="color: black;">(talk)</span>]] </span> 03:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC) <!--VCB Kailash29792-->
* '''Keep''': It could benefit from just a few more sources added. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Kailash29792|<b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b>]] [[User talk:Kailash29792|<span style="color: black;">(talk)</span>]] </span> 03:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC) <!--VCB Kailash29792-->
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Bruxton|Bruxton]] ([[User talk:Bruxton|talk]]) 16:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
*'''Keep''' Not to mention that many listed in "Cast" are notable people. [[User:Shankargb|Shankargb]] ([[User talk:Shankargb|talk]]) 17:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 19:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 23:42, 3 May 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. plicit 23:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Darshan (2004 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN film UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its not that clear cut, it is between no consensus and unreliable and during the RSN discussion it was not refuted that non-controversial content such as film reviews were still acceptable, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bruxton (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 19:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.