Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan (2004 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 23:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Darshan (2004 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN film UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are not many sources covering Kannada films of the early 2000s as shown by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annavru (2003 film) (which was nominated for deletion by me). Regarding the broken Deccan Herald review link, remember per Wikipedia:V, Do not reject reliable sources just because they are difficult or costly to access. Some reliable sources are not easily accessible. Most sources presented are coverage of the film, not passing mentions (like this). @Kataariveera:@Kailash29792: Please share your opinion. DareshMohan (talk) 22:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:TOI. The Times of India is not regarded as a WP:RS. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its not that clear cut, it is between no consensus and unreliable and during the RSN discussion it was not refuted that non-controversial content such as film reviews were still acceptable, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It could benefit from just a few more sources added. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bruxton (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not to mention that many listed in "Cast" are notable people. Shankargb (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 19:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.