Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Toymaker: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Celestial Toymaker.
 
Celestial Toymaker: Closed as redirect (XFDcloser)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Celestial Toymaker]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''redirect'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to [[The Celestial Toymaker]]. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 21:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
===[[:Celestial Toymaker]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Celestial Toymaker}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Toymaker|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 28#{{anchorencode:Celestial Toymaker}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1154633878/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Celestial Toymaker}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Toymaker|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 28#{{anchorencode:Celestial Toymaker}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1154633878/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 7: Line 12:
While generally notable in universe, the Toymaker has only appeared in one on screen story and some spin-off material, and I can't find much beyond that and 60th Anniversary speculation. While some commentary related to his role in the episode "The Celestial Toymaker" may exist, I don't think it's enough to warrant a separate article. In regards to the 60th speculation, it's just that and rumor mills right now, unlike someone like Beep the Meep, who's confirmed to return and has a shot at getting some significant coverage from it. Should anything turn up then, the article can be recreated, but I believe that as it stands right now, there's nothing concrete, and the Toymaker just doesn't have enough to justify the separate article. A possible AtD would be either a redirect to his titular episode, or a redirect to the Doctor Who Villains list. [[User:Pokelego999|Pokelego999]] ([[User talk:Pokelego999|talk]]) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
While generally notable in universe, the Toymaker has only appeared in one on screen story and some spin-off material, and I can't find much beyond that and 60th Anniversary speculation. While some commentary related to his role in the episode "The Celestial Toymaker" may exist, I don't think it's enough to warrant a separate article. In regards to the 60th speculation, it's just that and rumor mills right now, unlike someone like Beep the Meep, who's confirmed to return and has a shot at getting some significant coverage from it. Should anything turn up then, the article can be recreated, but I believe that as it stands right now, there's nothing concrete, and the Toymaker just doesn't have enough to justify the separate article. A possible AtD would be either a redirect to his titular episode, or a redirect to the Doctor Who Villains list. [[User:Pokelego999|Pokelego999]] ([[User talk:Pokelego999|talk]]) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements|Fictional elements]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction and fantasy|Science fiction and fantasy]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|Television]]. [[User:Pokelego999|Pokelego999]] ([[User talk:Pokelego999|talk]]) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements|Fictional elements]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction and fantasy|Science fiction and fantasy]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|Television]]. [[User:Pokelego999|Pokelego999]] ([[User talk:Pokelego999|talk]]) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)</small>
* '''Redirect''' to ''[[The Celestial Toymaker]]'' as there's more info of him there. He is not notable enough to have his own article. ''[[User:FlutterDash344|<span style="color:yellow">Flutter</span><span style="color:#87CEEB">Dash</span><span style="color:#CBC3E3">344</span>]]'' ([[User talk:FlutterDash344|<span style="color:#680C07">'''''talk'''''</span>]]) 21:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
* '''Delete/Redirect''' per nom. Doesn't have enough [[WP:SIGCOV]]. [[WP:BEFORE]] didn't reveal sources that really focus on this character. [[User:Shooterwalker|Shooterwalker]] ([[User talk:Shooterwalker|talk]]) 03:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
* '''Redirect to [[The Celestial Toymaker]]''': This seems to be a valid [[WP:ATD-R]] as it could be used as a valid search term for anyone omitting "The", and it can also provide the relevant character information given the character's limited use. - [[User:2pou|2pou]] ([[User talk:2pou|talk]]) 19:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC) <!--VCB 2pou-->
*'''Redirect''' The character does not have enough SIGCOV. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 15:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 21:52, 4 September 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to The Celestial Toymaker. Liz Read! Talk! 21:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Celestial Toymaker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While generally notable in universe, the Toymaker has only appeared in one on screen story and some spin-off material, and I can't find much beyond that and 60th Anniversary speculation. While some commentary related to his role in the episode "The Celestial Toymaker" may exist, I don't think it's enough to warrant a separate article. In regards to the 60th speculation, it's just that and rumor mills right now, unlike someone like Beep the Meep, who's confirmed to return and has a shot at getting some significant coverage from it. Should anything turn up then, the article can be recreated, but I believe that as it stands right now, there's nothing concrete, and the Toymaker just doesn't have enough to justify the separate article. A possible AtD would be either a redirect to his titular episode, or a redirect to the Doctor Who Villains list. Pokelego999 (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.