Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Toymaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to The Celestial Toymaker. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Celestial Toymaker

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While generally notable in universe, the Toymaker has only appeared in one on screen story and some spin-off material, and I can't find much beyond that and 60th Anniversary speculation. While some commentary related to his role in the episode "The Celestial Toymaker" may exist, I don't think it's enough to warrant a separate article. In regards to the 60th speculation, it's just that and rumor mills right now, unlike someone like Beep the Meep, who's confirmed to return and has a shot at getting some significant coverage from it. Should anything turn up then, the article can be recreated, but I believe that as it stands right now, there's nothing concrete, and the Toymaker just doesn't have enough to justify the separate article. A possible AtD would be either a redirect to his titular episode, or a redirect to the Doctor Who Villains list. Pokelego999 (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. Pokelego999 (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Celestial Toymaker as there's more info of him there. He is not notable enough to have his own article. FlutterDash344 (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete/Redirect per nom. Doesn't have enough WP:SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE didn't reveal sources that really focus on this character. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Celestial Toymaker: This seems to be a valid WP:ATD-R as it could be used as a valid search term for anyone omitting "The", and it can also provide the relevant character information given the character's limited use. - 2pou (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect The character does not have enough SIGCOV. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.