Talk:Silver Surfer: Difference between revisions
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m 68.204.140.129 didn't sign: "Marvel Zombies Section Vandalism?" |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 54 discussions to Talk:Silver Surfer/Archive 1. (BOT) |
||
(235 intermediate revisions by 94 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} |
|||
{{Comicsproj|class=B|importance=high}} |
|||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{Article history |
|||
|action1=GAN |
|||
|action1date=17:40, 7 April 2007 |
|||
|action1result=not listed |
|||
|action1oldid=120998730 |
|||
|action2=GAN |
|||
The term "Silver Surfer" is commonly used to denote a senior citizen Internet user. |
|||
|action2date=18:15, 30 May 2007 |
|||
Especially, though not exclusively, in the UK. |
|||
|action2result=not listed |
|||
|action2oldid=134585427 |
|||
|action3=GAN |
|||
http://www.google.com/search?q=silver+surfers |
|||
|action3date=09:19, 18 June 2007 |
|||
http://hackneysilversurfers.org.uk/ |
|||
|action3result=listed |
|||
|action3oldid=138906979 |
|||
|action4=GAR |
|||
How do you/would you differentiate? |
|||
|action4date=16:19, 30 August 2009 |
|||
|action4link=Talk:Silver Surfer/GA1 |
|||
|action4result=delisted |
|||
|action4oldid=310647831 |
|||
|action5=PR |
|||
Somebody needs to learn to spell. It's "sentinel" of the spaceways... --squadfifteen |
|||
|action5date=19:21, 31 August 2009 |
|||
|action5link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Silver Surfer/archive1 |
|||
|action5result=reviewed |
|||
|action5oldid=311118803 |
|||
|topic=literature |
|||
In the article it states "He can seemingly do anything, at least compared to other superheroes, who are limited to just one or a few powers" and then cite superman. Superman had this problem so why is he being used as an example? |
|||
|currentstatus=DGA |
|||
:This stuff is clearly non NPOV, Removed. [[User:T-1000|T-1000]] 23:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|||
{{WikiProject Comics|importance=High|Marvel-work-group=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Popular Culture|importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{tasks |
|||
|requests= |
|||
|copyedit=Write fictional information in present tense. |
|||
|wikify=Fictional biography |
|||
|merge= |
|||
|cleanup=Cultural references section. |
|||
|expand= |
|||
|disambiguation= |
|||
|stubs= |
|||
|update= |
|||
|npov= |
|||
|verify=Cite the comics where SS's powers are mentioned or discussed |
|||
|other= |
|||
}} |
|||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |age=4320 |archiveprefix=Talk:Silver Surfer/Archive |numberstart=1 |maxarchsize=75000 |header={{Automatic archive navigator}} |minkeepthreads=5 |minarchthreads=5 |format= %%i}} |
|||
==Edit-warring anon IP== |
|||
As I have noted on the talk page for of anon IP 2a02:c7d:2542:a200:f9a9:57b6:f0fe:e0f1, who is edit-warring rather than following [[WP:BRD]] after he was reverted the first time: "The infobox must match the article content. The [[WP:LEAD]] reads: "The character was created by Jack Kirby and first appeared in the comic book ''Fantastic Four'' #48, published in 1966." Please refrain form [[WP:EDITWAR|edit-warring]] to add something to the infobox that is not factually supported by the article text, and discuss the issue on the article's talk page." --[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 22:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==Image deletion nomination(s)== |
|||
===Ultimate Silver Surfer=== |
|||
One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC). |
|||
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a]]. |
|||
The article had the silver person with the wings pinned as the Ultimate Silver Surfer. However an identical being on a surfboard type item turned up in issue 3. |
|||
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 28]]. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first. |
|||
I would therefore hazard a guess that the figure with the wings is an ultimate version of Gabriel the Air-walker and the second is the Silver Surfer. However this is purely guess work at this stage. There could 1000s of those beings. |
|||
Sincerely, [[User:The Squirrel Conspiracy|The Squirrel Conspiracy]] ([[User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy|talk]]) 21:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Therefore I suggest that identification of WHOM the Silver Surfer is, is held off until someone is explicitly identified as such in the Mini-series? Otherwise we could erronously identify one silver being as being the surfer when in fact he has let to be revealed. |
|||
== Silver server as the inspiration for the Silver Surfer. == |
|||
--[[User:Charlesknight|Charlesknight]] 19:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
The Silver Surfer's name is close to "silver server", and he kind of looks a bit like a silver teapot on a silver tray. Could this be part of the inspiration for the character and/or his name, whether as a joke or not? [[User:Polar Apposite|Polar Apposite]] ([[User talk:Polar Apposite|talk]]) 19:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
"He is seen sometimes with large wings instead of a board and sometimes becoming one with his board, transforming into an eliptical shape. Wether there is more than one Surfer or if these are different versions remains to be seen." |
|||
:That's... very unlikely. [[User:Argento Surfer|Argento Surfer]] ([[User talk:Argento Surfer|talk]]) 19:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Why? [[User:Polar Apposite|Polar Apposite]] ([[User talk:Polar Apposite|talk]]) 09:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::The creation of the character is very well documented, and not disputed by any of the participants involved. None of them have ever mentioned serving trays. He's on a surfboard because Jack Kirby was tired of drawing spaceships, not for a pun. [[User:Argento Surfer|Argento Surfer]] ([[User talk:Argento Surfer|talk]]) 12:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::The Silver Surfer's origin is in alien astronomy (an allusion to "gastronomy"?) and his role was to provide ("serve up" one could say) planets (an allusion to "plates"?) to an alien ruler. This ties in with the Silver Surfer's name and appearance. Certainly it could be a coincidence. But if so, it is a remarkable one, and perhaps therefore deserves comment in the article, if only to say that there is no evidence that the pun was deliberate. But it is in the nature of puns to have the ability to be used cryptically, that is to say, with plausible denial. http://www.comicbookreligion.com/?c=9947&Silver_Server shows that I'm not the only one to notice that the origin story of the Silver Surfer seems to tie in with the "silver server" idea/pun. [[User:Polar Apposite|Polar Apposite]] ([[User talk:Polar Apposite|talk]]) 10:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::There is no need for the article to mention the possibility of a pun, then say there's no evidence that it's relevant. That would be original research, which is not acceptable in an article. [[User:Argento Surfer|Argento Surfer]] ([[User talk:Argento Surfer|talk]]) 14:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::::There's no need to do original research, since people e.g. http://www.comicbookreligion.com/?c=9947&Silver_Server are already saying there is a pun. All that would be needed would be document the existence of that page and any other existing discussion in the media or academia about a possible pun. [[User:Polar Apposite|Polar Apposite]] ([[User talk:Polar Apposite|talk]]) 21:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::People seeing a pun is not evidence of it being intended. Comic Book Religion is not a [[WP:RS|reliable source.]], and even if it was, it's covering a satire of the Silver Surfer, not the Silver Surfer directly. What you proposed, {{tq|Could this be part of the inspiration for the character}}, isn't supported by the link or the spoof and would be original research as [[WP:OR|Wikipedia uses the term]]. [[User:Argento Surfer|Argento Surfer]] ([[User talk:Argento Surfer|talk]]) 12:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::That image is coming from ''[[Megaton Man]]'', where [[Don Simpson (cartoonist)|Don Simpson]] will have parodied several other heroes as well. Should commentary of the same spoof be added to [[Galactus]] regarding the name Gluttonous? Should we add commentary that [[Wolverine (character)|Wolverine]] has been viewed as [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh-ao-lyEww "the Most Useless X-Man"] because [[Pete Holmes]] spoofed that? No to both questions, and I concur with [[User:Argento Surfer|Argento Surfer]] that this addition does not add any encyclopedic value. [[User:2pou|2pou]] ([[User talk:2pou|talk]]) 13:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::I'm not saying any of the things you mentioned should be in Wikipedia, but I've seen in a lot of Wikipedia articles a section called "In popular culture" where that sort of information does get included. I don't see why it should *not* be included. I guess it depends on whether Don Simpson's spoof of Galactus is notable. [[User:Polar Apposite|Polar Apposite]] ([[User talk:Polar Apposite|talk]]) 20:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::An "in pop culture" section would be redundant here, as Silver Surfer ''is'' popular culture. [[User:Argento Surfer|Argento Surfer]] ([[User talk:Argento Surfer|talk]]) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::If there's no published information suggesting that the Silver Surfer's name and look and origin story are deliberate rather than a remarkable coincidence, then I guess to speculate that they are not a coincidence would be original research. Is there really no published information on this? It seems surprising. Anyway, the fact that a "pun" has been commented on repeatedly is interesting in itself, and important, so I would have thought that would warrant some mention of it in the article. "Pun" seems an understatement, as it's a pun, and an appearance that matches the pun, and an origin story that matches the pun. It's more like a whole other interpretation or aspect of the Silver Surfer character. I think in an article about Gandalf the Grey, one could reasonably comment that some people have drawn a parallel with the Christian religion's Jesus due to how Gandalf descends to an underworld for three days, after an apparent death, but returns to the world of the living, in somewhat miraculous-looking way. The analogous (though less lofty, and more comedic) allusion to a "silver server" seemingly contained in the name, look, and origin of the Silver Surfer whether provable or not is so important that it should be mentioned, in my opinion. [[User:Polar Apposite|Polar Apposite]] ([[User talk:Polar Apposite|talk]]) 20:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::{{tq|Is there really no published information on this?}} I have never seen any, and I don't find this compelling enough to look for any. Neither Stan Lee nor Jack Kirby ever alluded to this pun despite when discussing the creation of the character. Even if there exists a reliable source raising the possibility, I see no value in adding such speculation from uninvolved parties. [[User:Argento Surfer|Argento Surfer]] ([[User talk:Argento Surfer|talk]]) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== MCU Special Presentation == |
|||
Lately there’s been talk from reliable sources like <u>Comic Book Resources</u> that there’s a '''Silver Surfer''' “''Special Presentation''” set in the '''Marvel Cinematic Universe'''. It’s already listed in the Wikipedia article [[Marvel Studios Special Presentations|here]]. Should it be put in the television section or is it too early? [[User:0Detail-Attention215|0Detail-Attention215]] ([[User talk:0Detail-Attention215|talk]]) 21:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
So if we don't know which is which or even if they are different - why are we assigning attributes to him? |
|||
== MCU == |
|||
--[[User:Charlesknight|Charlesknight]] 12:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I think Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel was being racist in the edit summary, in [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Silver_Surfer&action=history the revision history] of this page. In mentioning how to report on the [[Shalla-Bal]] incarnation of the [[Silver Surfer]] appearing in the MCU soon, they used the "Peter Parker is Spider-Man. Miles Morales is Miles Morales." [[Dog whistle (politics)|dog whistle]] as an argument, non-ironically. [[User:MaXXXine|MaXXXine]] ([[User talk:MaXXXine|talk]]) 23:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
A series cannot be *both* 'short-lived' and 'ongoing'. They're mutually-exclusive. Not being familiar with the series personally, I don't know which is correct, but someone who does should change it. |
|||
--Riff |
|||
:Here's the situation. The name "Silver Surfer" is synonymous with Norrin Radd, just like the name "Spider-Man" is with Peter Parker." Therefore, the article about the Silver Surfer is about Norrin Radd, and the article about Spider-Man is about Peter Parker. As a result, something about Shalla-Ball, such as a portrayor, should not be in the Silver Surfer article, but in the Shalla-Bal article, like portrayors of Miles Morales should be in the Miles Morales article, not the Spider-Man article. Your accusation is stupid. [[User:Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel|Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel]] ([[User talk:Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel|talk]]) 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
em.. no they are not mutally-exclusive in this context - I don't know who wrote that bit but it makes sense to me. He had an ongoing series but it was short-lived and cancelled. |
|||
--[[User:Charlesknight|Charlesknight]] 18:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I agree with Riff. "Ongoing" in the context of a series means it's ''still'' going on. I think "weekly" (or whatever timeframe is appropriate) is a good replacement for ongoing. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 20:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Physical powers == |
|||
I wouldn't say that he's completely resistant to physical attacks considering that Hulk literally bit his head of in Marvel zombies [[User:XSpaceyx|XSpaceyx]] 16:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Alternative universe - no idea of how that related to the mainstream 616 universe. |
|||
--[[User:Charlesknight|Charlesknight]] 19:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yep, alternate universe, no bearing on 616 reality what-so-ever. In the zombie-verse they "ate" Galactus who doesn't even have flesh. How do you "eat" a semi-abstract energy being if you are a zombie-fied Tony Stark? Bottom line: crap, alternate universe story with no bearing on mainstream continuity. |
|||
::::It was only IMPLIED that Galactus was eaten. That panel was never shown, although the zombies are shown to have gained the power cosmic later in the comic, it could be that they simply absorbed Galactus' energy. Bottom line: There is no proof that Galactus was eaten. |
|||
:::::The characters stated that they "ate" Galactus, pretty damning evidence. They were even arguing over who got what body parts. Bottom line: it's '''STILL''' a crap alternate universe story that has no bearing on the 616 reality. Defending plot points of this substandard story will NEVER make this story relevant to the mainstream Silver Surfer's durability. '''Bottom Line.''' |
|||
::::: It IS seen on panel the "heros" eating Galactus - There are multiple panels of it. Just one instance we see Spiderman rip off one of his fingers and eat it. |
|||
--[[User:Charlesknight|Charlesknight]] 17:03, 26 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Fine it has no bearing on 616 but it's not crap. Robert Kirkman is brilliant. It's all opinion. Like me saying I think you're crap (whoever said it). OPINION. No place for that here. Discuss the article only, this is not a message board. Read the rules if you don't get it...— [[User:ChocolateRoses|ChocolateRoses]] <sup>[[User talk:ChocolateRoses|talk]]</sup> |
|||
==Carnage symbiote== |
|||
How about we post a picture of Carnage's symbiote bonded with the Silver Surfer? Maybe the same one that, for some reason, was removed from the Carnage article. It would give our viewers a knowledge that the Silver Surfer wasn't always silver... 70.58.211.220 |
|||
He was still silver, just covered up by the symbiote. [[User:TheBalance|TheBalance]] 00:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Oh, interesting. Well, I think it would just look cool to show him as Silver-Carnage or the Carnage-Surfer. 70.58.211.220 |
|||
::Why? He was only the Carnage symbiote for a short period of time. |
|||
I just think it would look cool. |
|||
== Character history == |
|||
Some of the stuff in the section (such as his encounter with Doom) repeats itself later down the page. --[[User:DrBat|DrBat]] 20:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Light Speed and Hyper-space == |
|||
Only some Marvel writers adhere to the notion of "hyper-space". The Surfer has flown and fought at greater than light speed before without going into hyper-space. [[User:Lochdale|Lochdale]] 22:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Jean-Jacques Rousseau == |
|||
<blockquote>Clearly drawing inspiration from Rousseau, Lee's script allowed this completely amoral entity to develop a sense of compassion through contact with the gentle Alicia Masters, a blind sculptress somehow capable of perceiving the surfer's innate nobility.</blockquote> |
|||
uh, really? [[User:63.172.69.34|63.172.69.34]] 15:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:What is this, high school English class? Unless Stan Lee's drawing inspiration from Rousseau can be cited, it has no business in this article. - [[User:Hpanic7342|Hpanic7342]] 15:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Nonsense, right? Someone should fix it ... [[User:63.172.69.34|63.172.69.34http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Silver_Surfer&action=edit]] 15:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::I've fixed it. The passage makes immeasurably more sense now. - [[User:Hpanic7342|Hpanic7342]] 15:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Similarly, what on earth is up with the passing Hegel reference? Being very familiar with good ol' GWF, it is not "clear" what connection the Silver Surfer has to Hegel. The best I can come up with is some horrid misunderstanding of the PhG. Can the person who put this in take it out, or alternatively explain what the Hegelian inspiration is supposed to be and source it to something Lee has actually said? [[User:140.247.163.157|140.247.163.157]] 06:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== The Surfer can generate vast amounts of pie? == |
|||
<blockquote>Though it is not known for sure, the Surfer can generate vast amounts of pie.</blockquote> |
|||
I'm not a Silver Surfer expert or anything, but this seems like it might be vandalism to me. Perhaps it should be looked at... [[User:68.189.173.185|68.189.173.185]] 10:31, 30 December 2006 |
|||
Oh, you didn't know? The Surfer can generate VAST amounts of pie. POON TANG PIE! In fact, due to his ability to manipulate matter, he can generate pie from thin are. In all seriousness, it is vandalism so just fix it. [[User:63.152.9.76|63.152.9.76]] 01:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Annihilation Update? == |
|||
The section on Annihilation looks like it needs to be updated following the completion of the series. It sounds like it was written while it was still going on. --[[User:Jaardon|Jaardon]] 08:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Marvel Zombies Section Vandalism? == |
|||
According to the Marvel Zombies section, "In this alternate universe, where a portal is presumed to have led the infection (or zombies) there, silver surfer comes in contact with the zombie heroes. In a fight with him, they eventually defeat and feed from him. They seem to assume some of his cosmic power. Also they kill Galactucus and become in a twist multiple Galactucus's and feed on worlds to state their hunger. yeah!!!!". I haven't read this comic, but from what I understand, this isn't what happens, and is probably vandalism. Having not read it, though, I don't know what would go there as its replacement. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/68.204.140.129|68.204.140.129]] ([[User talk:68.204.140.129|talk]]) 02:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
Latest revision as of 03:16, 13 April 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Silver Surfer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
Silver Surfer was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Edit-warring anon IP
[edit]As I have noted on the talk page for of anon IP 2a02:c7d:2542:a200:f9a9:57b6:f0fe:e0f1, who is edit-warring rather than following WP:BRD after he was reverted the first time: "The infobox must match the article content. The WP:LEAD reads: "The character was created by Jack Kirby and first appeared in the comic book Fantastic Four #48, published in 1966." Please refrain form edit-warring to add something to the infobox that is not factually supported by the article text, and discuss the issue on the article's talk page." --Tenebrae (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Image deletion nomination(s)
[edit]One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 28. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Silver server as the inspiration for the Silver Surfer.
[edit]The Silver Surfer's name is close to "silver server", and he kind of looks a bit like a silver teapot on a silver tray. Could this be part of the inspiration for the character and/or his name, whether as a joke or not? Polar Apposite (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- That's... very unlikely. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Why? Polar Apposite (talk) 09:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- The creation of the character is very well documented, and not disputed by any of the participants involved. None of them have ever mentioned serving trays. He's on a surfboard because Jack Kirby was tired of drawing spaceships, not for a pun. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- The Silver Surfer's origin is in alien astronomy (an allusion to "gastronomy"?) and his role was to provide ("serve up" one could say) planets (an allusion to "plates"?) to an alien ruler. This ties in with the Silver Surfer's name and appearance. Certainly it could be a coincidence. But if so, it is a remarkable one, and perhaps therefore deserves comment in the article, if only to say that there is no evidence that the pun was deliberate. But it is in the nature of puns to have the ability to be used cryptically, that is to say, with plausible denial. http://www.comicbookreligion.com/?c=9947&Silver_Server shows that I'm not the only one to notice that the origin story of the Silver Surfer seems to tie in with the "silver server" idea/pun. Polar Apposite (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- There is no need for the article to mention the possibility of a pun, then say there's no evidence that it's relevant. That would be original research, which is not acceptable in an article. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- There's no need to do original research, since people e.g. http://www.comicbookreligion.com/?c=9947&Silver_Server are already saying there is a pun. All that would be needed would be document the existence of that page and any other existing discussion in the media or academia about a possible pun. Polar Apposite (talk) 21:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- People seeing a pun is not evidence of it being intended. Comic Book Religion is not a reliable source., and even if it was, it's covering a satire of the Silver Surfer, not the Silver Surfer directly. What you proposed,
Could this be part of the inspiration for the character
, isn't supported by the link or the spoof and would be original research as Wikipedia uses the term. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)- That image is coming from Megaton Man, where Don Simpson will have parodied several other heroes as well. Should commentary of the same spoof be added to Galactus regarding the name Gluttonous? Should we add commentary that Wolverine has been viewed as "the Most Useless X-Man" because Pete Holmes spoofed that? No to both questions, and I concur with Argento Surfer that this addition does not add any encyclopedic value. 2pou (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not saying any of the things you mentioned should be in Wikipedia, but I've seen in a lot of Wikipedia articles a section called "In popular culture" where that sort of information does get included. I don't see why it should *not* be included. I guess it depends on whether Don Simpson's spoof of Galactus is notable. Polar Apposite (talk) 20:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- An "in pop culture" section would be redundant here, as Silver Surfer is popular culture. Argento Surfer (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not saying any of the things you mentioned should be in Wikipedia, but I've seen in a lot of Wikipedia articles a section called "In popular culture" where that sort of information does get included. I don't see why it should *not* be included. I guess it depends on whether Don Simpson's spoof of Galactus is notable. Polar Apposite (talk) 20:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- If there's no published information suggesting that the Silver Surfer's name and look and origin story are deliberate rather than a remarkable coincidence, then I guess to speculate that they are not a coincidence would be original research. Is there really no published information on this? It seems surprising. Anyway, the fact that a "pun" has been commented on repeatedly is interesting in itself, and important, so I would have thought that would warrant some mention of it in the article. "Pun" seems an understatement, as it's a pun, and an appearance that matches the pun, and an origin story that matches the pun. It's more like a whole other interpretation or aspect of the Silver Surfer character. I think in an article about Gandalf the Grey, one could reasonably comment that some people have drawn a parallel with the Christian religion's Jesus due to how Gandalf descends to an underworld for three days, after an apparent death, but returns to the world of the living, in somewhat miraculous-looking way. The analogous (though less lofty, and more comedic) allusion to a "silver server" seemingly contained in the name, look, and origin of the Silver Surfer whether provable or not is so important that it should be mentioned, in my opinion. Polar Apposite (talk) 20:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Is there really no published information on this?
I have never seen any, and I don't find this compelling enough to look for any. Neither Stan Lee nor Jack Kirby ever alluded to this pun despite when discussing the creation of the character. Even if there exists a reliable source raising the possibility, I see no value in adding such speculation from uninvolved parties. Argento Surfer (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- That image is coming from Megaton Man, where Don Simpson will have parodied several other heroes as well. Should commentary of the same spoof be added to Galactus regarding the name Gluttonous? Should we add commentary that Wolverine has been viewed as "the Most Useless X-Man" because Pete Holmes spoofed that? No to both questions, and I concur with Argento Surfer that this addition does not add any encyclopedic value. 2pou (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- People seeing a pun is not evidence of it being intended. Comic Book Religion is not a reliable source., and even if it was, it's covering a satire of the Silver Surfer, not the Silver Surfer directly. What you proposed,
- There's no need to do original research, since people e.g. http://www.comicbookreligion.com/?c=9947&Silver_Server are already saying there is a pun. All that would be needed would be document the existence of that page and any other existing discussion in the media or academia about a possible pun. Polar Apposite (talk) 21:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- There is no need for the article to mention the possibility of a pun, then say there's no evidence that it's relevant. That would be original research, which is not acceptable in an article. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- The Silver Surfer's origin is in alien astronomy (an allusion to "gastronomy"?) and his role was to provide ("serve up" one could say) planets (an allusion to "plates"?) to an alien ruler. This ties in with the Silver Surfer's name and appearance. Certainly it could be a coincidence. But if so, it is a remarkable one, and perhaps therefore deserves comment in the article, if only to say that there is no evidence that the pun was deliberate. But it is in the nature of puns to have the ability to be used cryptically, that is to say, with plausible denial. http://www.comicbookreligion.com/?c=9947&Silver_Server shows that I'm not the only one to notice that the origin story of the Silver Surfer seems to tie in with the "silver server" idea/pun. Polar Apposite (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- The creation of the character is very well documented, and not disputed by any of the participants involved. None of them have ever mentioned serving trays. He's on a surfboard because Jack Kirby was tired of drawing spaceships, not for a pun. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Why? Polar Apposite (talk) 09:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
MCU Special Presentation
[edit]Lately there’s been talk from reliable sources like Comic Book Resources that there’s a Silver Surfer “Special Presentation” set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. It’s already listed in the Wikipedia article here. Should it be put in the television section or is it too early? 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 21:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
MCU
[edit]I think Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel was being racist in the edit summary, in the revision history of this page. In mentioning how to report on the Shalla-Bal incarnation of the Silver Surfer appearing in the MCU soon, they used the "Peter Parker is Spider-Man. Miles Morales is Miles Morales." dog whistle as an argument, non-ironically. MaXXXine (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Here's the situation. The name "Silver Surfer" is synonymous with Norrin Radd, just like the name "Spider-Man" is with Peter Parker." Therefore, the article about the Silver Surfer is about Norrin Radd, and the article about Spider-Man is about Peter Parker. As a result, something about Shalla-Ball, such as a portrayor, should not be in the Silver Surfer article, but in the Shalla-Bal article, like portrayors of Miles Morales should be in the Miles Morales article, not the Spider-Man article. Your accusation is stupid. Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Comics articles
- High-importance Comics articles
- B-Class Comics articles of High-importance
- B-Class Marvel Comics articles
- Marvel Comics work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles
- B-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- B-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles