Jump to content

Talk:Saker falcon: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 84.90.24.228 - "Horizontal speed lower than the peregrine: new section"
Added WikiProjects.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{BirdTalk|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Birds|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Africa}}
{{WikiProject Asia}}
}}
== Horizontal speed lower than the peregrine ==
== Horizontal speed lower than the peregrine ==


The peregrine falcon is much faster em stoop speed and is faster in horizontal speed than the saker falcon, therefore the text 'to provide falconers a bird with greater size and horizontal speed than the peregrine' makes no sense. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.90.24.228|84.90.24.228]] ([[User talk:84.90.24.228|talk]]) 16:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The peregrine falcon is much faster in stoop speed and is faster in horizontal speed than the saker falcon, therefore the text 'to provide falconers a bird with greater size and horizontal speed than the peregrine' makes no sense. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.90.24.228|84.90.24.228]] ([[User talk:84.90.24.228|talk]]) 16:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 18:58, 25 May 2024

Horizontal speed lower than the peregrine

[edit]

The peregrine falcon is much faster in stoop speed and is faster in horizontal speed than the saker falcon, therefore the text 'to provide falconers a bird with greater size and horizontal speed than the peregrine' makes no sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.90.24.228 (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]