Talk:Source Code: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:45, 10 July 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Source Code article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 years

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Cinema

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Release

The artitcle's use of "overall" suggests that the film grossed only $14 million. In fact it made over $100 million. Doesn't final gross typicaly follow weekend gross in the Release section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.146.35.163 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent move

Source Code (Film) should be Source Code (film). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 17:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Talk header}}
-{{ChicagoWikiProject|class=Stub|auto=inherit|importance=}}
-{{Film|class=Stub}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
+{{WikiProject United States|USfilm=y}}
-{{Science Fiction Project}}
+{{WikiProject Chicago|auto=inherit|importance=}}
-{{talkheader}}
+{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes}}
-== References to use ==
+{{WikiProject Science Fiction|importance=Mid}}
+}}
+{{User:MiszaBot/config
+| counter = 1
+| archive = Talk:Source Code/Archive %(counter)d
+| archiveheader = {{aan}}
+| algo = old(730d)
+| maxarchivesize = 75k
+| minthreadstoarchive = 2
+| minthreadsleft = 5
+}}
+== Release ==
-*[http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73275 ''Source Code'' Edit Bay Visit], comingsoon.net
-References to use. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 12:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
+The artitcle's use of "overall" suggests that the film grossed only $14 million.  In fact it made over $100 million.  Doesn't final gross typicaly follow weekend gross in the Release section? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.146.35.163|99.146.35.163]] ([[User talk:99.146.35.163#top|talk]]) 14:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)</small>
-== Groundhog Day? ==
+== The recent move ==
-"Colter re-lives the incident over and over again, gathering clues each time, until he can solve the mystery of who is behind the bombs and prevent the next attack." - Sounds like Groundhog Day. [[Special:Contributions/71.90.29.110|71.90.29.110]] ([[User talk:71.90.29.110|talk]]) 20:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
+Source Code (Film) should be Source Code (film).  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|contribs]]) 17:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)</small>
-New information indicates that he's crossing over into near-parallel timelines ala quantum mechanics and not able to influence his prime timeline. He needs the info from another timeline to find the bomber [[User:MikeSims|MikeSims]] ([[User talk:MikeSims|talk]]) 20:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
-:It looks like a rip off of "Deja Vu".[[Special:Contributions/74.100.60.53|74.100.60.53]] ([[User talk:74.100.60.53|talk]])
-== Requested move ==
-<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
-:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''
-The result of the proposal was '''move per request'''.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 22:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
-----
-[[Source Code (film)]] → {{no redirect|1=Source Code}} — Per [[WP:PRECISION]], we do not need to disambiguate if the topics are in different cases. The film is in title case, so when readers explicitly search for "Source Code", they will arrive at the film article. WP:PRECISION mentions [[red meat]] vs. [[Red Meat]]. Film examples include [[panic room]] vs. [[Panic Room]] and [[pulp fiction]] vs. [[Pulp Fiction]]. We can add a hatnote to point readers to [[source code]] just in case, but it is much more likely than not that they will be looking for the film. --[[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 23:29, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Comment''' or we could just build a dab page at {{noredirect|Source Code}}, since most likely links here will be for "source code", and people enter title case into the search box as well. [[Special:Contributions/184.144.160.156|184.144.160.156]] ([[User talk:184.144.160.156|talk]]) 04:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*:[[WP:DAB|Dab pages]] are for when there are several possible targets. When there are only 2, as here, [[WP:HATNOTE|hatnotes]] suffice and are much preferred. A dab page would only create an unnecessary extra step for readers to reach their intended target. --[[User:IllaZilla|IllaZilla]] ([[User talk:IllaZilla|talk]]) 05:22, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Support''' and hatnote each, per my above comment. --[[User:IllaZilla|IllaZilla]] ([[User talk:IllaZilla|talk]]) 05:22, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Support''' with hatnotes.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 06:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Support''' – not really a disambiguation issue as such, since Source Code is not really an alternative name for "Source code". The film should get the title page. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 07:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Support''' - with hatnote per above. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 15:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Support''' - I agree with Erik (no relation) and I think there probably ought to be a hatnote. [[User:ErikHaugen|ErikHaugen]] <small>([[User talk:ErikHaugen|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/ErikHaugen|contribs]])</small> 19:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*:I do find it funny that I run across you fairly often since the ''Fight Club'' discussion. :) [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 19:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Support''' Unique by means of capitalization. Hatnote will be required though. --[[User:Cybercobra|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 02:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->