Jump to content

Talk:Source Code: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Requested move 2: Formatting
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Chicago|class=C|auto=inherit|importance=}}
{{WikiProject United States|USfilm=y}}
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes|class=C}}
{{WikiProject Chicago|auto=inherit|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|class=C}}
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes}}
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| counter = 1
| archive = Talk:Source Code/Archive %(counter)d
| archiveheader = {{aan}}
| algo = old(730d)
| maxarchivesize = 75k
| minthreadstoarchive = 2
| minthreadsleft = 5
}}
}}

== References to use ==

*[http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73275 ''Source Code'' Edit Bay Visit], comingsoon.net
References to use. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 12:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

*[http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/04/12/guest-post-jim-kakalios-on-the-quantum-mechanics-of-source-code/ Physicist Jim Kakalios] discusses the seeming paradox of the ending. Probably nothing useful but if an analysis section develops eventually it might come in handy. [[User:Millahnna|Millahnna]] ([[User talk:Millahnna|talk]]) 17:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

*[http://madeinatlant.powweb.com/movies_central/2011/source_code_production_details.htm production notes] - online copy of the Production Notes for the movie, doesn't list full cast though. -[[User:AngusWOOF|AngusWOOF]] ([[User talk:AngusWOOF|talk]]) 16:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

== Groundhog Day? ==

"Colter re-lives the incident over and over again, gathering clues each time, until he can solve the mystery of who is behind the bombs and prevent the next attack, but he eventually falls in love with one of the passengers." - Sounds like Groundhog Day. [[Special:Contributions/71.90.29.110|71.90.29.110]] ([[User talk:71.90.29.110|talk]]) 20:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


New information indicates that he's crossing over into near-parallel timelines ala quantum mechanics and not able to influence his prime timeline. He needs the info from another timeline to find the bomber [[User:MikeSims|MikeSims]] ([[User talk:MikeSims|talk]]) 20:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
:It looks like a rip off of "Deja Vu".[[Special:Contributions/74.100.60.53|74.100.60.53]] ([[User talk:74.100.60.53|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 19:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Requested move ==

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

The result of the proposal was '''move per request'''.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 22:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
----
[[Source Code (film)]] → {{no redirect|1=Source Code}} — Per [[WP:PRECISION]], we do not need to disambiguate if the topics are in different cases. The film is in title case, so when readers explicitly search for "Source Code", they will arrive at the film article. WP:PRECISION mentions [[red meat]] vs. [[Red Meat]]. Film examples include [[panic room]] vs. [[Panic Room]] and [[pulp fiction]] vs. [[Pulp Fiction]]. We can add a hatnote to point readers to [[source code]] just in case, but it is much more likely than not that they will be looking for the film. --[[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 23:29, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' or we could just build a dab page at {{noredirect|Source Code}}, since most likely links here will be for "source code", and people enter title case into the search box as well. [[Special:Contributions/184.144.160.156|184.144.160.156]] ([[User talk:184.144.160.156|talk]]) 04:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*:[[WP:DAB|Dab pages]] are for when there are several possible targets. When there are only 2, as here, [[WP:HATNOTE|hatnotes]] suffice and are much preferred. A dab page would only create an unnecessary extra step for readers to reach their intended target. --[[User:IllaZilla|IllaZilla]] ([[User talk:IllaZilla|talk]]) 05:22, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support''' and hatnote each, per my above comment. --[[User:IllaZilla|IllaZilla]] ([[User talk:IllaZilla|talk]]) 05:22, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support''' with hatnotes.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 06:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support''' – not really a disambiguation issue as such, since Source Code is not really an alternative name for "Source code". The film should get the title page. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 07:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - with hatnote per above. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 15:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - I agree with Erik (no relation) and I think there probably ought to be a hatnote. [[User:ErikHaugen|ErikHaugen]] <small>([[User talk:ErikHaugen|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/ErikHaugen|contribs]])</small> 19:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*:I do find it funny that I run across you fairly often since the ''Fight Club'' discussion. :) [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 19:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Unique by means of capitalization. Hatnote will be required though. --[[User:Cybercobra|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 02:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->

== Source Code/Source code distinction ==

Hi!

I interpret the previous discussion to indicate that [[Source Code]] should lead to the movie, but [[Source code]] should lead to the concept. Isn't this the case? If not, I'd seriously request a reconsideration. Merely typing "source code" should lead to the concept, not the movie.

Thanks. [[User:Kumar Appaiah|Kumar Appaiah]] ([[User talk:Kumar Appaiah|talk]]) 15:03, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

:Your interpretation was correct. The reason is that the film is the more likely end result people are looking to reach (see [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]]). If, at some point in the future, we determine that is no longer the case, we can always change it. [[User:Millahnna|Millahnna]] ([[User talk:Millahnna|talk]]) 15:21, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

::Thank you for the explanation. [[User:Kumar Appaiah|Kumar Appaiah]] ([[User talk:Kumar Appaiah|talk]]) 01:59, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

:::People will only think about this being the most common usage as it is currently in the cinema. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]]....[[User:Simply south/Poem|..]] ''trying to improve for 5 years'' 16:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

::::I do suspect that eventually we'll end up changing it. Could be a little bit of recentism but as long as all the dabs are done properly it shouldn't be a big deal; everyone should be able to get to the article they are actually looking for firly easily. [[User:Millahnna|Millahnna]] ([[User talk:Millahnna|talk]]) 17:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

== Twelve Monkeys ==

I wouldn't know where to put it in the article, but this movie reminded me a lot of Twelve Monkeys.

Tyler Szabo 01:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tyler.szabo|Tyler.szabo]] ([[User talk:Tyler.szabo|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tyler.szabo|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Unfortunately, your personal experience from the movie has actually no place in the article. If you can find a reputable source that makes the comparison, only then it could be considered for inclusion. --[[User:UKER|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER|talk]]) 01:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

:: Just put it in "See also". :-P [[Special:Contributions/71.84.199.50|71.84.199.50]] ([[User talk:71.84.199.50|talk]]) 21:13, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

:::I wouldn't; the connection is not obvious (in fact it's escaping me entirely). If a source we can use makes the comparison then we could probably do something with it somewhere. [[User:Millahnna|Millahnna]] ([[User talk:Millahnna|talk]]) 22:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

:::: I, of course, wouldn't add it without a reference - but I didn't want to leave it unmentioned. Tyler Szabo 07:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tyler.szabo|Tyler.szabo]] ([[User talk:Tyler.szabo|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tyler.szabo|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== The REAL Sean Fentress ==

Does anyone know who the actor is that played the REAL Sean Fentress (the guy everyone in the Source Code sees, the picture on the wallet, Colter Steven's reflection)? I think it deserves a place in the article (Under Cast. Since the voice cameo got billing on WP, the body cameo should too). -[[User:Wingdude88|The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire]] ([[User talk:Wingdude88|talk]]) 17:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
:I found it. It's [[Frédérick De Grandpré.]] Source: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0214810/ -[[User:Wingdude88|The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire]] ([[User talk:Wingdude88|talk]]) 19:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

== Hero not really dead suggestion (for the plot summary) ==

At some point in the movie, it came to me that the hero might not be really dead (what a plot twist that would be...), given that his father speaks about getting just ashes back and we see him in the "incubator". Later this idea is rejected, given that the whole body is shown, but still, this seems to be a trick from the screenwriter and maybe worth mentioning in the plot summary. [[User:Adam Mirowski|Adam Mirowski]] ([[User talk:Adam Mirowski|talk]]) 03:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

== Plot clarification==
What does "allowed to die in peace afterwards instead of being held alive as a military artifact" mean? That he was murdered? The plot summary (which is so long it is more like a condensed book) is very poorly written and confusing. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.197.15.138|124.197.15.138]] ([[User talk:124.197.15.138|talk]]) 04:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Well, technically yes, he was killed, but given his situation, rather than murder I'd call it euthanasia. --[[User:UKER|uKER]] ([[User talk:UKER|talk]]) 19:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

== character section needs to go ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_Code#Characters trivial and OR]. Not necessary at all and written in opinionated format. Example:
<blockquote>She says exactly the same thing at the beginning of every sequence, no matter what facial emotions Colter is expressing (fear, confusion), whereas real human beings react in microseconds. Furthermore, when the bomb goes off ahead, it does not faze her. She still wants to know what the hell is going on beating up a guy on a train bench. All of this may be explainable if it has something of a simulation aspect, which is not perfect.</blockquote>

Rather than adding a tag, I suggest the whole section be axed because it cannot be polished in any way. Important character facts should be merged into the plot summary. [[User:Wikifan12345|Wikifan12345]] ([[User talk:Wikifan12345|talk]]) 12:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
:Completely agree. Just do it. [[User:Exok|Exok]] ([[User talk:Exok|talk]]) 12:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
::I also agree and have removed the section. Actors and their roles should be discussed using secondary sources in the "Cast" section. The plot summary is adequate for describing each character's noteworthy actions in the process of describing the film. [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contribs]]) 12:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC).


== Release ==
== Release ==


The artitcle's use of "overall" suggests that the film grossed only $14 million. In fact it made over $100 million. Doesn't final gross typicaly follow weekend gross in the Release section?
The artitcle's use of "overall" suggests that the film grossed only $14 million. In fact it made over $100 million. Doesn't final gross typicaly follow weekend gross in the Release section? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.146.35.163|99.146.35.163]] ([[User talk:99.146.35.163#top|talk]]) 14:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)</small>

== Mistake in Plot description. ==

I am inexperienced with editing at Wikipedia so I am not going to. I am however hereby reporting a mistake in the plot description. I will let you guys verify and edit.

The plot description now:
Once back aboard the train, Stevens disarms Frost, and then handcuffs Frost to a railing. Stevens uses Frost's cell phone to call authorities to inform them of the location of the dirty bomb, and then proceeds to throw Frost's phone off the train. Stevens borrows a phone to send an email, and he then calls his estranged father under the guise of a fellow soldier, mending the emotional distance from their past.
This is incorrect.

What did happen:
Stevens disarms Frost, handcuffs him to a railing. Uses the phone that was attached to the BOMB to call the authorities. Throws BOTH bomb phones aside. Takes Frosts OWN cellphone, and that is the phone he sends the email to Goodwin with and calls his dad with.

This can be verified by checking from 1 hour and 10 minutes into the movie.

Keep up the good work! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.57.199.150|80.57.199.150]] ([[User talk:80.57.199.150|talk]]) 12:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== "Science behind the Science Fiction" section ==

Marked it for refimprove because the only sources provided by whoever wrote it are a YouTube video and someone's blog. Considered deleting it altogether, but thought it might be worthwhile to keep, but it needs to be sourced by someone who knows about it. - [[User:Salamurai|Salamurai]] ([[User talk:Salamurai|talk]]) 16:45, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
*I'd go further and say that the whole section is complete bunkum, especially the stuff about consciousness affecting the outcome of the double-slit experiment, which is a preposterous misreading of quantum mechanics. ▫ [[User:Urbane_Legend|Urbane Legend]] <sup>[[User_talk:Urbane_Legend|chinwag]]</sup> 02:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

== Plot summary ==

This article needs a MUCH shorter plot summary [[Special:Contributions/82.46.109.233|82.46.109.233]] ([[User talk:82.46.109.233|talk]]) 20:56, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
:I disagree. The plot is under 700 words, which is within the guideline set down by [[WP:FILMPLOT]]. The plot is intricate and features a lot of twists and turns that cannot be accurately conveyed in a shorter, more general description. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 21:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
::I was the one who shortened it. Would you prefer a slightly longer description? We have three words of elbow room, after all. [[User:Interchangeable|<font color="blue">Inter</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Interchangeable|<font color="green">change</font>]][[User talk:Interchangeable|<font color="blue">able</font>]] 23:26, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

== Box office numbers ==
Grossing over 54 Billion with a "B?" I don't believe it. It must be a misprint!
[[Special:Contributions/71.106.65.36|71.106.65.36]] ([[User talk:71.106.65.36|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 07:09, 30 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Yes, it was; thanks for pointing it out. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 07:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

== Possession ==

Pretty amazing that this guy takes over some poor schmuck's body and nobody turns a hair. Sean Fentress is essentially murdered in the alternate reality and his body taken over by Colter Stevens. -- [[User:Derek Ross|Derek Ross]] &#124; [[User talk:Derek Ross|Talk]]'' 19:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

== Filming in Ottawa ==

Turned out the filming in Ottawa never happened : http://popgoesthenews.blogspot.ca/2010/03/jake-gyllenhaal-wont-be-shooting-in.html?m=1

[[User:Jlam|jlam]] ([[User talk:Jlam|talk]]) 03:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I've updated the info.
[[User:Jlam|jlam]] ([[User talk:Jlam|talk]]) 14:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

== Requested move 2 ==

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''


== The recent move ==
The result of the request was '''withdrawn by nominator'''. '''[[User:Corvoe|<span style="color:#FF00FF">Corvoe</span>]]''' [[User talk:Corvoe|<span style="color:#FF00FF">(speak to me)]]</span> 20:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
----
[[:Source Code]] → {{no redirect|Source Code (film)}} – the capital C is currently the only thing distinguishing the film from the concept [[User:Eventhorizon51|'''<span style="background-color:yellow;color:;">Event</span><span style="background-color:black;color:#00FFFF;">horizon51</span>''']] <sup>([[User talk:Eventhorizon51|talk]])</sup> 19:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


Source Code (Film) should be Source Code (film). <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|contribs]]) 17:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)</small>
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:PRECISION]]. If someone types in "Source Code" with a capital C, why would they be looking for the software concept? Also, did you read the original [[#Requested move|requested move]]? Same arguments. The issue also popped up over at [[Talk:Paranormal Activity#Move? (2)|Paranormal Activity's talk page]] a little while ago. I'd suggest reading through that and the original move request here and seeing if it changes your mind. '''[[User:Corvoe|<span style="color:#FF00FF">Corvoe</span>]]''' [[User talk:Corvoe|<span style="color:#FF00FF">(speak to me)]]</span> 19:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
</div>

Latest revision as of 17:45, 10 July 2024

Release

[edit]

The artitcle's use of "overall" suggests that the film grossed only $14 million. In fact it made over $100 million. Doesn't final gross typicaly follow weekend gross in the Release section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.146.35.163 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent move

[edit]

Source Code (Film) should be Source Code (film). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talkcontribs) 17:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]