Talk:The Sarah Jane Adventures: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:27, 20 July 2024

List of The Sarah Jane Adventures minor characters was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 June 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Sarah Jane Adventures. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Sarah Jane's Alien Files was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Sarah Jane Adventures. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The Sarah Jane Adventures has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 1, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Doctor Who Top‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Airdate for final episodes

Someone inserted October into the introduction as the airdate for the final episodes. So far only one source - Doctor Who Magazine - has speculated this date. The BBC has yet to announce when it will air and bear in mind this year Doctor Who is airing in the fall, so that may result in the SJA episodes airing later than usual (perhaps even around Christmas). Also, once the change was made the sentence no longer reflected the information in the cited source at the end of the sentence; when changing such info you need to make sure the source still matches - or is replaced by an updated source. 68.146.78.43 (talk) 13:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images Missing from Sarah Jane Adventures Episode Pages

I have noticed there are a number of SJA episode pages that do not have images the list is below i will tick them off as and when they are completed.

Invasion of the Bane Y
Eye of the Gorgon
From Raxacoricofallapatorius with Love
Prisoner of the Judoon
The Mad Woman in the Attic
The Eternity Trap
Mona Lisa's Revenge
The Gift

Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 17:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Audio Adventures page

I have started of the first audio adventures page as requested above The Glittering Storm Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article?

I'm hestitant as I say this but is this article a Good Article? And if it is not what needs to be done to improve it? Regards Rafmarham (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sarah Jane Adventures/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 12:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will conduct a full review once certain things have been addressed, which need to be done within 7 days:

Please address all citation needed and original research tags.

Article on hold. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 12:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs a thorough copyedit. For example, there should be no space between consecutive references; the standard of English is poor in much of the article. Consider the audiobooks section alone:

"Series star" - not encyclopedic wording;
"Minute" should not be capitalised, and, preferably, with a non-breaking space before it;
"called "The Monster Hunt" written by Trevor Baxendale, read by Anjli Mohindra this episode" - grammar.
"Both parts can only be downloaded by finding aliens" really? surely this gimmick is not notable. The fact they can be found on the website is sufficient;
"Sarah Jane Adventures" - self redirect;
"Website" - should be "website"
"It is unclear if these will be the last stories, ending with the series, or if they will carry on after series 5 has ended." - poorly worded for an encyclopedia.

See if you can apply these ideas to the whole article. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 15:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon is not a reliable source and these should be replaced. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who would you recomend to be a reliable source? Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 14:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any independent media source that mentions the existence of such a DVD, preferably. I'd be prepared to accept one from the BBC or its affiliates in these locations, though. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 18:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The references for the existence of DVDs and Blu-ray have been changed to BBC Shop and 2 Entertain links which are official BBC websites. thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are some others in the "audiobooks" section. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Audiobook section is references have been amended, I think the Novelisations has a lot of Amazon references so i will find other official references for them. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Novelisations section references has now been amended is there anything else that needs to be done. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 16:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to do it it drabs, but #18 isn't broken and #73 and #74 need more details (date, page, ISSN(?)). Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above items you described have no been resolved thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The citation needed tags need filling with citations. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All Citations have now been resolved. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please expand the section that I have now marked as requiring expansion. I think that may be all. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded on the Critical response section. Tsange ☯ Talk 18:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although I would have liked some more "reputable" critics, there's enough there to satisfy the criteria. Passing. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Sarah Jane Adventures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Sarah Jane Adventures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080413054520/http://www.hkatv.com/v3/schedule/schedule-world.html to http://www.hkatv.com/v3/schedule/schedule-world.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110208090023/http://thesja.com/ to http://www.thesja.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110208090023/http://thesja.com/ to http://www.thesja.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who exactly counts as starring

Unlike its sister shows Doctor Who and Torchwood, The Sarah Jane Adventures has just one actor mentioned in its title sequence throughout, Elisabeth Sladen, which is why I felt that additional actors being put under starring would require a source mentioning intent from the BBC and/or producers (unlike, say, Eve Myles in Torchwood). On my talk page I was given the reasoning that if the end credits characters have an "obvious cast order", then that should be sufficient and no references are needed.

However, a) this excludes John Leeson and Alexander Armstrong from the main cast regardless as they are consistently behind Joseph Millson and Juliet Cowan in the credits order (and also Mina Anwar and Ace Bhatti later on) and no one for one second thinks Alan and Chrissie are uncontroversially main cast, and b) Tommy Knight's reduced number of appearances as Luke in series 4 and 5 would still make him one of the main characters based on his position in the credits, ahead of Daniel Anthony and Anjli Mohindra. I mean, this page has a promotional image with both Tommy Knight and Sinead Michael, who debuted in series 5. TardisTybort (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Doctor Who characters"

Separately, but also related to my edit yesterday: For what purpose is there for the eight overlapping Doctor Who cast in a table, three of hose eight being from news broadcast exposition scenes, and why are non-appearances and brief mentions of characters (including a couple whose actors died in the 80s and 90s) mentioned like that on the primary page of the series? How is that passage anything to do with cast and crew, never mind a subheader? Surely the appearances of the Doctor and Jo can just be placed in sentence form in the cast section immediately above, where Nicholas Courtney as Alistair Lethbridge-Stewart is already mentioned. TardisTybort (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]