Jump to content

Template talk:Star Trek ships named Enterprise: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Aatrek (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{StarTrekproject|class=Template|importance=NA}}
{{WikiProject Star Trek}}
{{WikiProject Science Fiction}}
}}

<table align="center" width="80%" style="background: beige; border-style:solid; border: solid black 3px">
<table align="center" width="80%" style="background: beige; border-style:solid; border: solid black 3px">
<tr>
<tr>
<td width="0px" height="60px"><center>{{Click|link=Category:Star_Trek_templates|image=Merge-arrow_2.svg|width=100px}} <b>This page contains merged content from ''[[Template: Star Trek Enterprise captains]]'' ([[Template talk:Star Trek Enterprise captains|talk]]).</b> </center></td>
<td width="0px" height="60px"><div class="center">[[File:Merge-arrow_2.svg|100px|link=Category:Star_Trek_templates]] <b>This page contains merged content from ''[[Template: Star Trek Enterprise captains]]'' ([[Template talk:Star Trek Enterprise captains|talk]]).</b> </div></td>
</table>
</table>



Latest revision as of 13:25, 30 July 2024

This page contains merged content from Template: Star Trek Enterprise captains (talk).

Flagship

[edit]

Enterprise was always the flagship. Even -J was addressed in that way just as -C (Klingons were impressed because UFPians sacrificed their flagship for them). -D and -E has been referanced multiple times as the flagship just as the original. I believe -B and -A were also addressed in that manner. --Cat out 19:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"I believe"
Cite source rather than your intuition for -C, -B, -A. Note also that this template is also on ST:E Enterprise, which obviously isn't a *Federation* flagship. Reverting to "ships named Enterprise". --EEMeltonIV 23:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]