Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Longevity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Marie Brémont and Wwew345t: Reply |
→Longeviquest: new section |
||
| (30 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
|algo = old(180d) |
|algo = old(180d) |
||
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Longevity/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Longevity/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archives |auto=long |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot II |age=6 |units=months}} |
{{archives |auto=long |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot II |age=6 |units=months}} |
||
== |
== How to live till 100 == |
||
About health advice from (super)centenarians: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/24/health/long-life-advice-centenarian-partner-content-wellness/index.html --[[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 09:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Adding LongeviQuest to the project page == |
|||
Another non-article. Will go to Afd when I have time. [[User:DerbyCountyinNZ|<span style="background:orange; color:blue">DerbyCountyinNZ</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:DerbyCountyinNZ|Talk]] [[Special:Contribs/DerbyCountyinNZ|Contribs]])</sup> 22:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:And done: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekla Juniewicz]]. [[User:DerbyCountyinNZ|<span style="background:orange; color:blue">DerbyCountyinNZ</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:DerbyCountyinNZ|Talk]] [[Special:Contribs/DerbyCountyinNZ|Contribs]])</sup> 22:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Would someone more involved with this WikiProject please add a statement about the reliability of |
|||
== Project-independent quality assessments == |
|||
{{url|https://longeviquest.com}} & {{tq|https://lq1.wpengine.com}} to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Longevity#Databases]] section? [[User:Peaceray|Peaceray]] ([[User talk:Peaceray|talk]]) 16:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Food for thought ... == |
|||
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]], but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent [[WP:Village pump (proposals)/Archive_198#Project-independent_quality_assessments|Village pump proposal]] was approved and has been implemented to add a {{para|class}} parameter to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. |
|||
*{{cite web |last=Newman |first=Saul Justin |title=‘The data on extreme human ageing is rotten from the inside out’ – Ig Nobel winner Saul Justin Newman |website=The Conversation |date=2024-09-13 |url=https://theconversation.com/the-data-on-extreme-human-ageing-is-rotten-from-the-inside-out-ig-nobel-winner-saul-justin-newman-239023 |access-date=2024-09-16}} |
|||
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. |
|||
[[User:Peaceray|Peaceray]] ([[User talk:Peaceray|talk]]) 20:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} a new {{para|QUALITY_CRITERIA|custom}} parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 13:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::The only food for thought hs is the sad fact that people will make outrageous claims just for attention just like those Russian conspiracy theorists who made that ridiculous claim about Jeanne calment [[User:Wwew345t|Wwew345t]] ([[User talk:Wwew345t|talk]]) 14:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Longeviquest == |
|||
== Marie Brémont and Wwew345t == |
|||
Since the grg has a page shouldn't we make one for longeviquest as well? Since they are also a research group and has also been cited in the media [[User:Wwew345t|Wwew345t]] ([[User talk:Wwew345t|talk]]) 15:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
After being merged into [[List of French supercentenarians]], I noticed that {{u|Wwew345t|this user}} has unilaterally removed the redirect which retained consensus for five years (and IMO was a good merge), then reverting a restoration of the redirect by {{u|Sam Sailor}}. A look at the user's contributions, at [[Special:Contributions/Wwew345t]] shows that they are new, with less than 100 edits, and have done the same thing on many other longevity redirects, reverting editors such as {{u|Technopat}}, {{u|Devonian Wombat}}, and {{u|DerbyCountyinNZ}}, and even having gotten blocked for edit-warring by {{u|Ponyo}}, although disruptive behavior continues since the block expires. {{u|Ponyo}}, perhaps an indef is in order. [[Special:Contributions/Chicdat|🐔]] [[User:Chicdat|Chicdat]] ''<sup style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User talk:Chicdat|Bawk to me!]]</sup>'' 10:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Wwew345t's return to edit warring right after their block expired is, well, less than ideal, but it seems to have stopped now. Try to hammer out some sort of consensus on the redirects on the relevant talk pages if possible.-- [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 18:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::I havent reverted any pages that have had a afd but I would like to know how I can try to restore a page that did [[User:Wwew345t|Wwew345t]] ([[User talk:Wwew345t|talk]]) 18:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Their familiarity with Wiki terminology suggests they have had previous user profiles. Possibly a sockpuppet of a blocked user. [[User:DerbyCountyinNZ|<span style="background:orange; color:blue">DerbyCountyinNZ</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:DerbyCountyinNZ|Talk]] [[Special:Contribs/DerbyCountyinNZ|Contribs]])</sup> 10:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
::there are some pages deleted in 2018 that can be expanded to look better with more sources and some new pages that could be added my intention only is to expand the topic of longevity here because there is a severe lack of info [[User:Wwew345t|Wwew345t]] ([[User talk:Wwew345t|talk]]) 13:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Longevity biographies are usually deleted because they fail [[WP:BIO1E]], [[WP:NOPAGE]] and/or [[WP:ANYBIO]]. In the past such bios were padded with longevity fanfluff including [[WP:OR]], [[WP:SYNTH]] and [[WP:TRIVIA]]. The deleted bios do not increase in notability over time, in fact quite the opposite. Removing a redirect to resurrect such an article without addressing the relevant guidelines is, at the least, not constructive. [[User:DerbyCountyinNZ|<span style="background:orange; color:blue">DerbyCountyinNZ</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:DerbyCountyinNZ|Talk]] [[Special:Contribs/DerbyCountyinNZ|Contribs]])</sup> 07:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::While in some cases it would make sense there should atleast be pages for every person who held the title "worlds oldest person" if that's not notable enough for a article then nothing in the topic is there are serval supercentenarians that get way more coverage then 80% of the athletes that have pages here I'm sure if you looked you would see that for yourself [[User:Wwew345t|Wwew345t]] ([[User talk:Wwew345t|talk]]) 14:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::Take for instance misao okawa who was worlds oldest person for almost two years the oldest Japanese person ever at the time of her death and in the top ten oldest people ever if you looked her up youd see she got significant coverage about her by multiple news sources yet her article got deleted without so much as a consideration there are many more instances of this where a supercenarian article seems to have been dogpiled by 4 editors (who dont even edit in the topic anymore) without a glance with some of the basis being "just because your the oldest person alive it doesnt matter" "so what if they were it isnt notable" occasionally they would atleast attempt to give a reason that makes a little sense but more often then not it was just 4 users teaming up to get rid of articles in a topic and not caring otherwise [[User:Wwew345t|Wwew345t]] ([[User talk:Wwew345t|talk]]) 14:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::They were even called out for such behavior when it was happening by some administrators and I know you are probably going "why does he care? He is probably a sock of the grg" I dont like the grg wont delve into why but let's just say they havent been acting very mature lately on another platform but anyway I cant believe uts taken 5 years for anyone to adress what happned in this topic and that's sad [[User:Wwew345t|Wwew345t]] ([[User talk:Wwew345t|talk]]) 14:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:39, 27 October 2024
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
How to live till 100
[edit]About health advice from (super)centenarians: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/24/health/long-life-advice-centenarian-partner-content-wellness/index.html --Randykitty (talk) 09:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Adding LongeviQuest to the project page
[edit]Would someone more involved with this WikiProject please add a statement about the reliability of
longeviquesthttps://lq1.wpengine.com
to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Longevity#Databases section? Peaceray (talk) 16:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Food for thought ...
[edit]- Newman, Saul Justin (2024-09-13). "'The data on extreme human ageing is rotten from the inside out' – Ig Nobel winner Saul Justin Newman". The Conversation. Retrieved 2024-09-16.
Peaceray (talk) 20:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- This man has no clue what he is talking about Wwew345t (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- The only food for thought hs is the sad fact that people will make outrageous claims just for attention just like those Russian conspiracy theorists who made that ridiculous claim about Jeanne calment Wwew345t (talk) 14:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Longeviquest
[edit]Since the grg has a page shouldn't we make one for longeviquest as well? Since they are also a research group and has also been cited in the media Wwew345t (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)