Jump to content

Talk:Elizabeth Báthory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Elizabeth Báthory/Archive 5) (bot
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{controversial}}
{{controversial}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Bathory, Elizabeth|vital=yes|living=no|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|class=C|living=no|royalty-work-group=yes|listas=Bathory, Elizabeth}}
{{WikiProject Biography|royalty-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Serial Killer task force|class=C|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=High|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=High}}
{{WikiProject Criminal Biography|class=C|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Hungary|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Hungary|class=C|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Slovakia|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Slovakia|class=C|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject European history|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject European history| class=C| importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=C|importance=Mid}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 18: Line 17:
|archive = Talk:Elizabeth Báthory/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Elizabeth Báthory/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Criminals|class=B}}
{{Press|author=Crystal Ro|title=15 Horrifying Female Serial Killer Wikipedia Pages That Are Not For The Squeamish|org=Buzzfeed|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/crystalro/female-serial-killers|date=2019-11-29}}
{{Press|author=Crystal Ro|title=15 Horrifying Female Serial Killer Wikipedia Pages That Are Not For The Squeamish|org=Buzzfeed|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/crystalro/female-serial-killers|date=2019-11-29}}
__TOC__
__TOC__
Line 25: Line 23:
* "Elizabeth Báthory" {{Find3|Elizabeth Báthory}}
* "Elizabeth Báthory" {{Find3|Elizabeth Báthory}}
* "Báthory Erzsébet" {{Find3|Báthory Erzsébet}}
* "Báthory Erzsébet" {{Find3|Báthory Erzsébet}}
== Maintenance tags ==
== It is a momentous error to treat the legend of Bathory as fact ==
I am attempting to address the issues noted by the maintenance tags. I have worked on the neutrality and sourcing issues (so far removing livejournal and pop history sources) and will continue to do so. I wanted to ask here, though, about the citation style tag. I have noticed some citations that do not have complete info; is that what it's referring to? What exactly is "unclear" about the citation style?--[[User:MattMauler|MattMauler]] ([[User talk:MattMauler|talk]]) 19:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

The peer-reviewed source by Aleksandra Bartosiewicz from 2018 is an important addition to this article. It was added in [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Báthory&diff=prev&oldid=1052508249&diffmode=source this edit]. The detailed and well sourced article was written directly in english. Bartosiewicz first covers the ''legends'' surrounding Bathory and then moves on to cover the ''historical facts'' of her life. It is a long article with several sections. The Wikipedia biography of Bathory should primarly concern itself with the historical facts rather than the ledgends presented as fact. Much of the existing sourcing in the Wikipedia article is weak and comes from brief blurbs about Bathory from non-academic writers. Bartosiewicz is a very strong source.

Furthermore, ''we don't know exactly how'' Michael Farin phrased the claims that have been left in the article's lede from his book ''Heroine of horror: the life and work of Elisabeth Báthory in letters, testimonies and fantasy games'' (1989). Did his German get mis-translated? Does his phrasing suggest that it is purported or absolute? It is worth recognizing that Farin's book is interested in subject matter far beyond the historical facts of Bathory's life . . . namely fantasy games. For a book published in 1989, it's not real clear what sort of fantasy games there were to write about at that time in history or how they would be of any use to establishing historical facts about Bathory's life.

If the strongest sources disagree, editors should not just go with the side they prefer. For those who have yet to review Bartosiewicz, see the section titled "Elisabeth Báthory’s biography according to historical sources" which starts on page 113. [[User:Cedar777|Cedar777]] ([[User talk:Cedar777|talk]]) 20:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

== History.com is not a reliable source ==

This is what is listed at [[WP:RSP]] for the History Channel and History.com:
{{tq|"Most editors consider The History Channel generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for accuracy and its tendency to broadcast programs that promote conspiracy theories."}}
The source "History" is too poor of quality for something [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Báthory&diff=prev&oldid=1106547479&diffmode=source like this]. Content cited to this source was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Báthory&oldid=1050685977 removed once before here] for the same reason, that it is flagged as RED at WP:RSP. Nothing has changed. A consensus of editors deem History to be generally unreliable. [[User:Cedar777|Cedar777]] ([[User talk:Cedar777|talk]]) 23:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

:{{u|TheXuitts}}, there are a number of sources that refer to the accusations against Bathory as alleged, even if you personally disagree that historians are not aligned. There is a brief interview [https://www.vice.com/en/article/ex9awa/inside-the-ruined-castle-of-medieval-serial-killer-elizabeth-bathory here] with [[Tony Thorne]], author of ''Countess Dracula: The Life and Times of Elisabeth Bathory, the Blood Countess'' that covers much of the disputed material. While Vice itself is not a great source (its yellow at WP:RSP), Thorne is notable as a writer and his English language book on Bathory, covers a lot of ground. His words in the Vice interview are worth recognizing and it provides a much more concise summary of his overall views after he spent considerable time translating and studying the records of her life which the Google book preview does less effectively. [[User:Cedar777|Cedar777]] ([[User talk:Cedar777|talk]]) 11:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:20, 28 October 2024

Untitled

[edit]

Maintenance tags

[edit]

I am attempting to address the issues noted by the maintenance tags. I have worked on the neutrality and sourcing issues (so far removing livejournal and pop history sources) and will continue to do so. I wanted to ask here, though, about the citation style tag. I have noticed some citations that do not have complete info; is that what it's referring to? What exactly is "unclear" about the citation style?--MattMauler (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]