Jump to content

Talk:Elizabeth Báthory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Elizabeth Báthory/Archive 5) (bot
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{controversial}}
{{controversial}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Bathory, Elizabeth|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Bathory, Elizabeth|vital=yes|living=no|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|royalty-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Biography|royalty-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=High|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=High}}
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=High|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=High}}
{{WikiProject Hungary|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Hungary|importance=Low}}
Line 23: Line 23:
* "Elizabeth Báthory" {{Find3|Elizabeth Báthory}}
* "Elizabeth Báthory" {{Find3|Elizabeth Báthory}}
* "Báthory Erzsébet" {{Find3|Báthory Erzsébet}}
* "Báthory Erzsébet" {{Find3|Báthory Erzsébet}}
== Maintenance tags ==
== les lèvres rouges - Daughters of Darkness ==
I am attempting to address the issues noted by the maintenance tags. I have worked on the neutrality and sourcing issues (so far removing livejournal and pop history sources) and will continue to do so. I wanted to ask here, though, about the citation style tag. I have noticed some citations that do not have complete info; is that what it's referring to? What exactly is "unclear" about the citation style?--[[User:MattMauler|MattMauler]] ([[User talk:MattMauler|talk]]) 19:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

'popular culture' or 'see also' is incomplete without the Belgian erotic vampire thriller "Les Lèvres Rouges"; featuring the gorgeous Delphine Seyrigg as the countess' 1971 reincarnation, the newlywed Danielle Ouimet as her object of lust, and the ingénue Andrea Rau as her hapless familiar. [[Special:Contributions/2001:14BB:A9:1C36:D035:C9B4:177E:FBD5|2001:14BB:A9:1C36:D035:C9B4:177E:FBD5]] ([[User talk:2001:14BB:A9:1C36:D035:C9B4:177E:FBD5|talk]]) 11:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

== Reddit Ask Historians ==

This article is one-side in favor of the theory that Bathory was innocent and railroaded. I added contrary information, but it was removed because Reddit is "not a reliable source". However, my citation was to the AskHistorians subreddit which is moderated and peer-reviewed. I'm putting it back. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mooseman2|Mooseman2]] ([[User talk:Mooseman2#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mooseman2|contribs]]) 18:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Hi, AskHistorians is moderated, but not peer-reviewed, and it still does not meet the definition of reliable source. I go to at AskHistorians from time to time, and generally the users *cite* reliable sources, but you would have to actually read those sources and cite ''them'' rather than a Reddit post.--[[User:MattMauler|MattMauler]] ([[User talk:MattMauler|talk]]) 18:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:20, 28 October 2024

Untitled

[edit]

Maintenance tags

[edit]

I am attempting to address the issues noted by the maintenance tags. I have worked on the neutrality and sourcing issues (so far removing livejournal and pop history sources) and will continue to do so. I wanted to ask here, though, about the citation style tag. I have noticed some citations that do not have complete info; is that what it's referring to? What exactly is "unclear" about the citation style?--MattMauler (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]