Talk:Elizabeth Báthory: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MattMauler (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Elizabeth Báthory/Archive 5) (bot |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{controversial}} |
{{controversial}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Bathory, Elizabeth|vital=yes|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Bathory, Elizabeth|vital=yes|living=no|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Biography |
{{WikiProject Biography|royalty-work-group=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=High|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=High}} |
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=High|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject Hungary|importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Hungary|importance=Low}} |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* "Elizabeth Báthory" {{Find3|Elizabeth Báthory}} |
* "Elizabeth Báthory" {{Find3|Elizabeth Báthory}} |
||
* "Báthory Erzsébet" {{Find3|Báthory Erzsébet}} |
* "Báthory Erzsébet" {{Find3|Báthory Erzsébet}} |
||
== Maintenance tags == |
|||
== les lèvres rouges - Daughters of Darkness == |
|||
I am attempting to address the issues noted by the maintenance tags. I have worked on the neutrality and sourcing issues (so far removing livejournal and pop history sources) and will continue to do so. I wanted to ask here, though, about the citation style tag. I have noticed some citations that do not have complete info; is that what it's referring to? What exactly is "unclear" about the citation style?--[[User:MattMauler|MattMauler]] ([[User talk:MattMauler|talk]]) 19:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'popular culture' or 'see also' is incomplete without the Belgian erotic vampire thriller "Les Lèvres Rouges"; featuring the gorgeous Delphine Seyrigg as the countess' 1971 reincarnation, the newlywed Danielle Ouimet as her object of lust, and the ingénue Andrea Rau as her hapless familiar. [[Special:Contributions/2001:14BB:A9:1C36:D035:C9B4:177E:FBD5|2001:14BB:A9:1C36:D035:C9B4:177E:FBD5]] ([[User talk:2001:14BB:A9:1C36:D035:C9B4:177E:FBD5|talk]]) 11:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Reddit Ask Historians == |
|||
This article is one-side in favor of the theory that Bathory was innocent and railroaded. I added contrary information, but it was removed because Reddit is "not a reliable source". However, my citation was to the AskHistorians subreddit which is moderated and peer-reviewed. I'm putting it back. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mooseman2|Mooseman2]] ([[User talk:Mooseman2#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mooseman2|contribs]]) 18:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Hi, AskHistorians is moderated, but not peer-reviewed, and it still does not meet the definition of reliable source. I go to at AskHistorians from time to time, and generally the users *cite* reliable sources, but you would have to actually read those sources and cite ''them'' rather than a Reddit post.--[[User:MattMauler|MattMauler]] ([[User talk:MattMauler|talk]]) 18:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:20, 28 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elizabeth Báthory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Untitled
[edit]- "Elizabeth Báthory" Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- "Báthory Erzsébet" Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Maintenance tags
[edit]I am attempting to address the issues noted by the maintenance tags. I have worked on the neutrality and sourcing issues (so far removing livejournal and pop history sources) and will continue to do so. I wanted to ask here, though, about the citation style tag. I have noticed some citations that do not have complete info; is that what it's referring to? What exactly is "unclear" about the citation style?--MattMauler (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- C-Class vital articles in People
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- High-importance Crime-related articles
- C-Class Serial killer-related articles
- High-importance Serial killer-related articles
- Serial Killer task force
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Hungary articles
- Low-importance Hungary articles
- All WikiProject Hungary pages
- C-Class Slovakia articles
- Low-importance Slovakia articles
- All WikiProject Slovakia pages
- C-Class European history articles
- Mid-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press