Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endeeper: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m fixed lint errors – stripped tags |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 10:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
:{{la|Endeeper}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endeeper|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 September 3#{{anchorencode:Endeeper}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
:{{la|Endeeper}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endeeper|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 September 3#{{anchorencode:Endeeper}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources|Endeeper}}) |
:({{Find sources|Endeeper}}) |
||
Line 7: | Line 12: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small> —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 20:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small> —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 20:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''. [[WP:CSD#G11|Unambiguous advertisement]] (''The company is composed by a group of experienced professionals in Geology, Computer Science and Knowledge Management ... Custom solutions on knowledge management and information systems, including the organizational aspects, human issues and information technology needs.'') for a [[WP:B2B|back office niche business]] (''a provider of software and services for knowledge management and data integration for the upstream oil and gas industry''). - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 19:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. [[WP:CSD#G11|Unambiguous advertisement]] (''The company is composed by a group of experienced professionals in Geology, Computer Science and Knowledge Management ... Custom solutions on knowledge management and information systems, including the organizational aspects, human issues and information technology needs.'') for a [[WP:B2B|back office niche business]] (''a provider of software and services for knowledge management and data integration for the upstream oil and gas industry''). - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 19:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Relevant article'''. You should |
*'''Relevant article'''. You should notice that Endeeper is not just another software company. It is the only company in the world that offers a large range of software for petrography. We have not added this in the article, because you may consider it an advertise. In addition, Endeeper has several scientific publications about the subjects that it studies. I can add a large list of links to the publications. So, as Endeeper is a company with a lot of relevant research about petrography and knowledge management, it is relevant to wikipedia. Petrography is a sub-area of geology and it is very important for oil studies. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Eduardoestima|talk]] ([[User:Eduardoestima]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eduardoestima|contribs]]) 15:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::'''Comment''' - The above comment may well have been written by [http://www.endeeper.com/company/team Eduardo S. Estima de Castro] a core member of the Endeeper team and therefore is at severe risk of [[WP:COI|Conflict of interest]]. <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' [[User:Velella|Velella]] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup> </span> 21:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::'''Comment''' - Indeed, I am not hidding my identity, I am one of the owners of Endeeper and I have written an article that describes the company in a neutral point of view. Please, note that I have removed the expression 'group of experienced professionals', because a member has identified as a potential spam expression. As wikipedia is a public place for sharing knowledge and petrography is a specific area of geology, I think that is important to publish information about companies that are relevant to this subject. In fact, I recommend a visit to [http://www.endeeper.com/research/publications Research Papers] to understand why it is relevant to have this company listed in wikipedia, Endeeper has published several papers about the area in relevant journals. [[User talk:EduardoEstima|Eduardo S. Estima de Castro]] Talk 23:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 09:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:N]], no evidence of sufficient third party coverage in the article. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 07:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |