Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endeeper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ironholds (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Endeeper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No assertion of notability - just another software company. No refs to support any notability. Principally an advertisement Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unambiguous advertisement (The company is composed by a group of experienced professionals in Geology, Computer Science and Knowledge Management ... Custom solutions on knowledge management and information systems, including the organizational aspects, human issues and information technology needs.) for a back office niche business (a provider of software and services for knowledge management and data integration for the upstream oil and gas industry). - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relevant article. You should notice that Endeeper is not just another software company. It is the only company in the world that offers a large range of software for petrography. We have not added this in the article, because you may consider it an advertise. In addition, Endeeper has several scientific publications about the subjects that it studies. I can add a large list of links to the publications. So, as Endeeper is a company with a lot of relevant research about petrography and knowledge management, it is relevant to wikipedia. Petrography is a sub-area of geology and it is very important for oil studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by talk (User:Eduardoestima • contribs) 15:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The above comment may well have been written by Eduardo S. Estima de Castro a core member of the Endeeper team and therefore is at severe risk of Conflict of interest. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Indeed, I am not hidding my identity, I am one of the owners of Endeeper and I have written an article that describes the company in a neutral point of view. Please, note that I have removed the expression 'group of experienced professionals', because a member has identified as a potential spam expression. As wikipedia is a public place for sharing knowledge and petrography is a specific area of geology, I think that is important to publish information about companies that are relevant to this subject. In fact, I recommend a visit to Research Papers to understand why it is relevant to have this company listed in wikipedia, Endeeper has published several papers about the area in relevant journals. Eduardo S. Estima de Castro Talk 23:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N, no evidence of sufficient third party coverage in the article. Sandstein 07:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.