Jump to content

Talk:International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Paburr (talk | contribs)
Update archiving templates after a page move (Report bot issues)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Disaster management|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Disaster management |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Energy|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Energy |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Environment|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Environment |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Science Policy|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 11: Line 12:
|minthreadsleft = 2
|minthreadsleft = 2
|algo = old(180d)
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:International Nuclear Event Scale/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{auto archiving notice|age=180}}


== Nomination of [[:Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]] for deletion ==
== Church Rock and Santa Susana ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]]''', which is related to and cited in this article, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
Why is there no mention of [[Church Rock uranium mill spill]] or the meltdown of the [[Sodium Reactor Experiment]] at the [[Santa Susana Field Laboratory]]? Church Rock was at least level 4 if not 5. It released more radiation than Three Mile Island. '''[[User:Barticus88|<span style='color:#ffffff; background:#55CC44'> &nbsp;Randall Bart&nbsp; </span>]][[User talk:Barticus88|<span style='color:#ffffff; background:#CC7766'> &nbsp;Talk&nbsp; </span>]]'''
:This isn't intended to be an exhaustive list; some examples are given. Incidentally, if either of those accidents was ever assigned an INES rating, it doesn't appear to be listed in either article. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 01:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== External links modified ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice -->
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


== Second (1958) Chalk River incident should also be in this list ==
I have just modified 2 external links on [[International Nuclear Event Scale]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/810427446|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110413145944/http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_05.html to http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_05.html
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.ujv.gov.si/nc/en/splosno/cns/news/article/12088/5400/
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://200.0.198.11/comunicados/18_12_2006.pdf
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www-news.iaea.org/news/topics/topic/erfs/erf/default.asp?VersionNum=1&TopicID=660
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/INES-2009_web.pdf


My guess is that the 1958 incident would be level 4, but I have not been able to find any source that confirms this. (Fuel rod was damaged and caught fire, reactor was damaged, interior of building + 0.4 sq km contaminated.) https://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionD.htm#nru1958
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


Note that the [[List of civilian nuclear accidents]] article lists it as level 5, but this may be due to a misreading of the following source discussing the 1952 incident: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph241/zerkalov1/docs/mukhopadhyay.pdf [[User:KaiaVintr|KaiaVintr]] ([[User talk:KaiaVintr|talk]]) 18:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
:I don't think we need more examples in the table; we already arguably have too many. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
::Suggestion is based on the fact that Sellafield appears in the list eight times, and calling the Chalk River accident the "first" naturally makes people wonder about the others. But anyway, if no reference can be found for the rating, then not much can be done. [[User:KaiaVintr|KaiaVintr]] ([[User talk:KaiaVintr|talk]]) 18:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


== Samut Prakan radiation accident should be on the list, no? ==
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samut_Prakan_radiation_accident <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dsandber|Dsandber]] ([[User talk:Dsandber#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dsandber|contribs]]) 09:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Nomination of [[:Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]]''', which is related to and cited in this article, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice -->

Latest revision as of 12:00, 11 December 2024

Nomination of Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale, which is related to and cited in this article, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Second (1958) Chalk River incident should also be in this list

[edit]

My guess is that the 1958 incident would be level 4, but I have not been able to find any source that confirms this. (Fuel rod was damaged and caught fire, reactor was damaged, interior of building + 0.4 sq km contaminated.) https://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionD.htm#nru1958

Note that the List of civilian nuclear accidents article lists it as level 5, but this may be due to a misreading of the following source discussing the 1952 incident: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph241/zerkalov1/docs/mukhopadhyay.pdf KaiaVintr (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we need more examples in the table; we already arguably have too many. VQuakr (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion is based on the fact that Sellafield appears in the list eight times, and calling the Chalk River accident the "first" naturally makes people wonder about the others. But anyway, if no reference can be found for the rating, then not much can be done. KaiaVintr (talk) 18:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samut Prakan radiation accident should be on the list, no?

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samut_Prakan_radiation_accident — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsandber (talkcontribs) 09:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]