Talk:International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nomination of Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale, which is related to and cited in this article, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Second (1958) Chalk River incident should also be in this list

My guess is that the 1958 incident would be level 4, but I have not been able to find any source that confirms this. (Fuel rod was damaged and caught fire, reactor was damaged, interior of building + 0.4 sq km contaminated.) https://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionD.htm#nru1958

Note that the List of civilian nuclear accidents article lists it as level 5, but this may be due to a misreading of the following source discussing the 1952 incident: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph241/zerkalov1/docs/mukhopadhyay.pdf KaiaVintr (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we need more examples in the table; we already arguably have too many. VQuakr (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion is based on the fact that Sellafield appears in the list eight times, and calling the Chalk River accident the "first" naturally makes people wonder about the others. But anyway, if no reference can be found for the rating, then not much can be done. KaiaVintr (talk) 18:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samut Prakan radiation accident should be on the list, no?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samut_Prakan_radiation_accident — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsandber (talk • contribs) 09:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]