Jump to content

User talk:Godofincompetence: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
(38 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Talk Page Archives ==

[[User talk:Godofincompetence/Archive1 | Archive (December 2024)]]
== Welcome! ==
== Welcome! ==
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"
Line 70: Line 71:
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->


== aight bro ==
== "people with autism" / "autistic people" ==

''Changed "people with autism" to "autistic people" because the majority of autistic people prefer this terminology''

What is your source for this claim? --[[User:Calton|Calton]] &#124; [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 08:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


i wasn't even the one who added the marijuana possion part, only how it it was unfair. I'ma change it back to what it was but don't delete. this ain't even my work on the hideki taniuchi. his arrest is very important. DO NOT REVERT [[Special:Contributions/73.50.75.106|73.50.75.106]] ([[User talk:73.50.75.106|talk]]) 04:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
: {{reply to|Calton}} Actual study: https://altogetherautism.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-Kenny-terms-to-describe-autism.pdf (I'm looking specifically at how autistic people, in general, prefer autistic to people with autism-- I don't think it's important what non-autistic people think about that.) Article by an autistic person explaining why: https://autisticadvocacy.org/about-asan/identity-first-language/ [[User:Queenofconfusion|Queenofconfusion]] ([[User talk:Queenofconfusion#top|talk]]) 06:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
::I'm not seeing anything in that paper making such a specific claim. Please point me to the specific page and passage that says that a majority prefers "autistic people" over "people with autism". --[[User:Calton|Calton]] &#124; [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 10:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
::Again, I'm not seeing anything in that paper making such a specific claim. Please point me to the specific page and passage that says that a majority prefers "autistic people" over "people with autism". --[[User:Calton|Calton]] &#124; [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 01:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


:I saw that you weren't the one who added that, I just also didn't think it should be in the article at all since it seems pretty irrelevant to who he is? I'm not familiar with his work though so I could be wrong. [[User:Godofincompetence|Godofincompetence]] ([[User talk:Godofincompetence#top|talk]]) 04:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Using solely the cited paper, I believe the "page and passage" that best demonstrates what you're asking would be Page 4, specifically Figure 3.
::made music for a while until arrested indefinitely for getting caught with weed in japan. most likely still behind bars sadly [[Special:Contributions/73.50.75.106|73.50.75.106]] ([[User talk:73.50.75.106|talk]]) 05:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)


== we chill hopefully ==
(While Queenofconfusion did middle it a bit, it's worth noting an error: the argument wasn't "autistic people" over "people with autism," it was preference for "autistic" over "people with autism.")


yo ill not troll no more if u don't do nothing to the hideki page. I got no beef with u. [[Special:Contributions/73.50.75.106|73.50.75.106]] ([[User talk:73.50.75.106|talk]]) 04:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Obviously this calls for a little bit of latitude, but going by what is provided in Figure 3 about a singular choice and using solely responses from autistic people (n=502), this resulted in a roughly 54% preference for either "has autism," "on the autism spectrum," or (most of all) "autistic."


== thx for chillin ==
If estimates are to be trusted, roughly 1% of the global population is autistic; when the story was published in 2015, that would mean around 74 million people globally. Using the autistic sample of 502 autistics with a 95% confidence interval, their responses represent a margin of error just under 5%. (The latitude I asked for is over trickling matters like how some countries don't believe autism is real, regions where any display of mental illness is demonized or derided, etc. . . y'know, things of that nature.)


based socialist [[Special:Contributions/73.50.75.106|73.50.75.106]] ([[User talk:73.50.75.106|talk]]) 05:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Given the statistics and how "autistic" is the predominant choice while "person with autism" ranks fifth out of eight choices, I'd say that qualifies as the majority choosing identity-first over person-first language. [[User:Actibus.consequatur|Actibus.consequatur]] ([[User talk:Actibus.consequatur|talk]]) 02:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


:Glad you think so (although I might need to update that userbox, I'm thinking I'm more of a straight-up communist now)-- but also please don't vandalize any more articles because it just means someone has to chase you around reverting your edits and doesn't accomplish what *you* want it to accomplish which is the edit actually staying up. Plus, a lot of the time when I see a vandal, I go and check all of their other edits too and end up reverting those as well (assuming those are also vandalism-- but I'm less quick to assume good faith after I've already seen someone vandalizing). [[User:Godofincompetence|Godofincompetence]] ([[User talk:Godofincompetence#top|talk]]) 05:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
{{reply to|Calton}} See Actibus.consequatur's comment above (you weren't tagged so I'm just making sure you see it, haha). Also, there is a general consensus among the autistic community about this on social media from what I've seen-- I follow a lot of autistic creators and they all pretty much agree. Not the most credible source though, haha. There are a lot of articles online, though-- here's another helpful article I found and it has someone a lot more qualified than I am who also says that, generally speaking, autistic people prefer "autistic people" to "people with autism": https://news.northeastern.edu/2018/07/12/unpacking-the-debate-over-person-first-vs-identity-first-language-in-the-autism-community/ [[User:Queenofconfusion|Queenofconfusion]] ([[User talk:Queenofconfusion#top|talk]]) 20:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


== how to make new account so that an unnamed user gets of my back ==
== December 2022 ==


pls help [[Special:Contributions/73.50.75.106|73.50.75.106]] ([[User talk:73.50.75.106|talk]]) 05:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:User talk:FMSky]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:FMSky|FMSky]] ([[User talk:FMSky|talk]]) 01:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


:Just make high quality edits (or, honestly, just edits that abide by the rules of Wikipedia) and you'll be fine. I'm assuming good faith with you. I've literally decided that I would monitor your page a bit more and manually revert any disruptive editing instead of reporting you to people who would get you banned altogether because I think you have good intentions (and may or may not be in some way intoxicated? If you're intoxicated, get off Wikipedia and come back tomorrow) [[User:Godofincompetence|Godofincompetence]] ([[User talk:Godofincompetence#top|talk]]) 05:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:FMSky|FMSky]] First of all, all I did was use the pronouns template on your talk page, which is ''not'' vandalizing or disruptive editing. Second of all, Wikipedia's policies clearly state that one should use the pronouns and gendered language that one prefers when talking about them. Additionally, even if you ''do'' believe that Tony Hawk's child is his son, using the word "children" would still be correct. It is in [[foundation:Policy:Universal_Code_of_Conduct|Wikimedia's code of conduct]] that one will use a person's preferred pronouns, and this extends to gendered language such as the word "son". By referring to Tony Hawks' child as his son, you are directly going against Wikimedia's code of conduct. I will revert your change once more and further action against Wikimedia's code of contact may result in you being blocked from editing. [[User:Queenofconfusion|Queenofconfusion]] ([[User talk:Queenofconfusion#top|talk]]) 02:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:23, 19 December 2024

Talk Page Archives

Archive (December 2024)

Welcome!

Hello, Queenofconfusion! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

aight bro

i wasn't even the one who added the marijuana possion part, only how it it was unfair. I'ma change it back to what it was but don't delete. this ain't even my work on the hideki taniuchi. his arrest is very important. DO NOT REVERT 73.50.75.106 (talk) 04:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you weren't the one who added that, I just also didn't think it should be in the article at all since it seems pretty irrelevant to who he is? I'm not familiar with his work though so I could be wrong. Godofincompetence (talk) 04:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
made music for a while until arrested indefinitely for getting caught with weed in japan. most likely still behind bars sadly 73.50.75.106 (talk) 05:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

we chill hopefully

yo ill not troll no more if u don't do nothing to the hideki page. I got no beef with u. 73.50.75.106 (talk) 04:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thx for chillin

based socialist 73.50.75.106 (talk) 05:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you think so (although I might need to update that userbox, I'm thinking I'm more of a straight-up communist now)-- but also please don't vandalize any more articles because it just means someone has to chase you around reverting your edits and doesn't accomplish what *you* want it to accomplish which is the edit actually staying up. Plus, a lot of the time when I see a vandal, I go and check all of their other edits too and end up reverting those as well (assuming those are also vandalism-- but I'm less quick to assume good faith after I've already seen someone vandalizing). Godofincompetence (talk) 05:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how to make new account so that an unnamed user gets of my back

pls help 73.50.75.106 (talk) 05:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just make high quality edits (or, honestly, just edits that abide by the rules of Wikipedia) and you'll be fine. I'm assuming good faith with you. I've literally decided that I would monitor your page a bit more and manually revert any disruptive editing instead of reporting you to people who would get you banned altogether because I think you have good intentions (and may or may not be in some way intoxicated? If you're intoxicated, get off Wikipedia and come back tomorrow) Godofincompetence (talk) 05:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]