Talk:Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (TV series): Difference between revisions
→Composer: Reply |
Favre1fan93 (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::::::I am citing a reliable source. The production, me, the composer, the director, the producers, the studio. Everyone. [[User:WeAreFamily1996|WeAreFamily1996]] ([[User talk:WeAreFamily1996|talk]]) 01:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
::::::I am citing a reliable source. The production, me, the composer, the director, the producers, the studio. Everyone. [[User:WeAreFamily1996|WeAreFamily1996]] ([[User talk:WeAreFamily1996|talk]]) 01:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::::''You'' do not conform with [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]]. Given that you have now been linked the relevant policies, please educate yourself on them. Thank you. -- [[User:Alex 21|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#02B">Alex_</span><span style="font-size:smaller;color:#02B">21</span>]]<sub> [[User talk:Alex 21|<span style="font-size:xx-small;color:#009">TALK</span>]]</sub> 01:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
:::::::''You'' do not conform with [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]]. Given that you have now been linked the relevant policies, please educate yourself on them. Thank you. -- [[User:Alex 21|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#02B">Alex_</span><span style="font-size:smaller;color:#02B">21</span>]]<sub> [[User talk:Alex 21|<span style="font-size:xx-small;color:#009">TALK</span>]]</sub> 01:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Possible move == |
|||
I have just attempted to revert and clean-up an unexplained series of moves by {{u|FreeRogue}} who copied the contents of this article over to [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy]], which previously housed the information that has now been moved to [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (1997 video game)]]. This discussion is to determine the best outcome for the rest of this clean-up work: |
|||
# Leave the TV series at [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (TV series)]] and the video game at [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (1997 video game)]], and turn [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy]] into a disambiguation page |
|||
# Leave the TV series at [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (TV series)]] and move the video game back to [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy]] |
|||
# Move the TV series to [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy]] correctly and leave the video game at [[Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (1997 video game)]] |
|||
I personally would lean towards Option 3 as it is likely that the TV series will become the primary topic, similar to what happened with [[Star Trek: Section 31]], but I can also see arguments for Option 1 making sense at the moment. Any thoughts on the best approach here are welcome. - [[User:Adamstom.97|adamstom97]] ([[User talk:Adamstom.97|talk]]) 11:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I vote for option 3 [[User:Vilnisr|<span style="font-size:medium; color:#000080; background:#ffeeee; text-color:green">''– Vilnisr''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Vilnisr|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Vilnisr|C]]</sup> 12:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Option 1. For an upcoming series, you can't claim it is the primary topic when it hasn't even released yet. And given the existance of a similarly titled video game, option 1 is the way forward at this time. - [[User:Favre1fan93|Favre1fan93]] ([[User talk:Favre1fan93|talk]]) 18:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 29 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (TV series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Composer
[edit]Jeff Russo is the composer on this show. He has been working on episodes 2,3, and 4 related to the filming of those episodes and has already started work on the score and theme. I work on his team.WeAreFamily1996 (talk) 23:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- If you work on his team, kindly see WP:COI. -- Alex_21 TALK 23:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is not an edit of an opinon, but just a statement of fact. There is no COI there. WeAreFamily1996 (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Writing about someone you work for is a conflict of interest, no matter what it is that you are saying. Regardless, all information must be supported by a reliable source, we cannot take your (or anyone else's) word for it. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- That makes no sense. The reliable source is me. I am involved, that is not a conflict that is a fact. You dont have to take my word for it, I have a right to put this here as much as you have a right to not believe it. Im not sure I understand why you wouldnt. This is not far fetched. This is completely within reason. WeAreFamily1996 (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- It is not. You have been asked, told and warned about this. Citing a reliable source is a basic part of Wikipedia, but you seem to ignore this wilfully. I've reported you for edit warring. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am citing a reliable source. The production, me, the composer, the director, the producers, the studio. Everyone. WeAreFamily1996 (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- You do not conform with WP:RS and WP:V. Given that you have now been linked the relevant policies, please educate yourself on them. Thank you. -- Alex_21 TALK 01:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am citing a reliable source. The production, me, the composer, the director, the producers, the studio. Everyone. WeAreFamily1996 (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- It is not. You have been asked, told and warned about this. Citing a reliable source is a basic part of Wikipedia, but you seem to ignore this wilfully. I've reported you for edit warring. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- That makes no sense. The reliable source is me. I am involved, that is not a conflict that is a fact. You dont have to take my word for it, I have a right to put this here as much as you have a right to not believe it. Im not sure I understand why you wouldnt. This is not far fetched. This is completely within reason. WeAreFamily1996 (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Writing about someone you work for is a conflict of interest, no matter what it is that you are saying. Regardless, all information must be supported by a reliable source, we cannot take your (or anyone else's) word for it. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is not an edit of an opinon, but just a statement of fact. There is no COI there. WeAreFamily1996 (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Possible move
[edit]I have just attempted to revert and clean-up an unexplained series of moves by FreeRogue who copied the contents of this article over to Star Trek: Starfleet Academy, which previously housed the information that has now been moved to Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (1997 video game). This discussion is to determine the best outcome for the rest of this clean-up work:
- Leave the TV series at Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (TV series) and the video game at Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (1997 video game), and turn Star Trek: Starfleet Academy into a disambiguation page
- Leave the TV series at Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (TV series) and move the video game back to Star Trek: Starfleet Academy
- Move the TV series to Star Trek: Starfleet Academy correctly and leave the video game at Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (1997 video game)
I personally would lean towards Option 3 as it is likely that the TV series will become the primary topic, similar to what happened with Star Trek: Section 31, but I can also see arguments for Option 1 making sense at the moment. Any thoughts on the best approach here are welcome. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I vote for option 3 – Vilnisr T | C 12:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Option 1. For an upcoming series, you can't claim it is the primary topic when it hasn't even released yet. And given the existance of a similarly titled video game, option 1 is the way forward at this time. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Star Trek articles
- Top-importance Star Trek articles
- WikiProject Star Trek articles
- C-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American television articles
- Unknown-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class Ontario articles
- Low-importance Ontario articles
- C-Class Toronto articles
- Unknown-importance Toronto articles
- C-Class Canadian TV shows articles
- Low-importance Canadian TV shows articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages