Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waenceslaus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
{{SPIarchive notice|153.151.83.197}}
{{SPIarchive notice|Waenceslaus}}
{{SPIpriorcases}}
{{SPIpriorcases}}
===24 November 2015===
{{SPI case status|}}

;Suspected sockpuppets
* {{checkuser|1=Inception2010}}
* {{checkip|1=166.170.44.25}}
* {{checkuser|1=930310}}
* {{checkuser|1=LC-Barti}}
* {{checkuser|1=Fiskje88}}
* {{checkuser|1=White Eaglet }}
* {{checkuser|1=Ollie231213}}
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
*[http://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/uc?uc=153.151.83.197 User compare report] <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>
*[http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py Editor interaction utility]

All of these are [[WP:SPA]] bent on protecting article [[Anna Eliza Williams]]. They are !voting Keep in this discussion about it:[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Eliza Williams]]. If these are not sockpuppets, they are at least meat puppets. [[User:Mr. Guye|Mr. Guye]] ([[User talk:Mr. Guye|talk]]) 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
* This is the most ridiculous crap I have ever heard. Just because someone votes "Keep" in an AfD doesn't mean that they are a sockpuppet. Why not nominate the people who voted "Delete" as well? How can you be sure that they aren't sockpuppets? I am myself and almost every single account you can find on the internet with the username "930310" is associated to me, not someone else. [[User:930310|930310]] ([[User talk:930310|talk]]) 09:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
* As an admin who's probably involved here, I'd say it's a bit weak to use ''a single'' AFD discussion as evidence. There's probably two dozen or so discussions found at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Article alerts]] that have similar patterns with possibly the same individuals. Note though that ARBCOM discretionary sanctions are available for any uninvolved admin which may be a better method of dealing with the more aggressive editors. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 11:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Latest revision as of 08:53, 26 November 2015

Waenceslaus

Waenceslaus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waenceslaus/Archive.