User talk:Waenceslaus

Plea to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waenceslaus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Arbitration Committee, My name is Waenceslaus. I am addressing you with a kind plea to lift my topic-ban on longevity articles and block on the English Wikipedia effective since Aug. 16, 2015 and Nov. 24, 2015, respectively. Here is the link to the 2015 discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Waenceslaus/Archive I took three years in abstinence from the Wikipedia edition after the block. I hope that after all this time, I could be given a second chance. Over the last three years, I have gained more knowledge in various fields of science, which I believe will allow us to benefit in editing the English version of Wikipedia. I also developed socially. If only you could consider my kind request positively, I promise to avoid bad behavior, joining in editorial wars etc., and I promise to always use balanced arguments in communication with other users of the English version of Wikipedia, so that my behaviour it will not cause any more doubts and/or concerns. Sincerely, Waenceslaus Waenceslaus (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you wish to contact the arbitration committee, please follow the instructions at WP:ARBCOM. I cannot lift your topic ban. I also decline your unblock request because you have not addressed the reasons for your block. Yamla (talk) 14:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It should be pointed out that the block was for sockpuppetry (though there were other problems as well).
I take no position on the unblock, but the topic ban should remain until there's been at least 6 months of productive editing in other areas.

E Eng 12:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there's no reasonable chance anyone, including ArbCom, will lift the topic ban until at least six months after you've been unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Waenceslaus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aleksandra Dranka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Subcarpathian voivodeship]] near [[Jasło]], passed away on [[29 April]] [[2014]] in [[Jasło]])<ref>[http://rzeszow.gazeta.pl/rzeszow/1,34962,15885581,Zmarla_najstarsza_kobieta_w_Polsce__Miala_111_lat.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aleksandra Dranka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Subcarpathian voivodeship]] near [[Jasło]], passed away on [[29 April]] [[2014]] in [[Jasło]])<ref>[http://rzeszow.gazeta.pl/rzeszow/1,34962,15885581,Zmarla_najstarsza_kobieta_w_Polsce__Miala_111_lat.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aleksandra Dranka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Subcarpathian voivodeship]] near [[Jasło]], passed away on [[29 April]] [[2014]] in [[Jasło]])<ref>[http://rzeszow.gazeta.pl/rzeszow/1,34962,15885581,Zmarla_najstarsza_kobieta_w_Polsce__Miala_111_lat.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Polish supercentenarians edit

Can you please explain this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_Polish_supercentenarians&diff=629161210&oldid=628428364 I'm confused. Which is the actual oldest living person in Poland: Antoni Sławiński or Jadwiga Młynek? Deaths in 2013 (talk) 00:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Wanda Błeńska, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:OCR4uqL.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OCR4uqL.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Waenceslaus

User:Waenceslaus, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Waenceslaus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Waenceslaus during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CommanderLinx (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've undone your edits and restored your userpage. The MFD tag states that the tag cannot be removed. You are allowed to edit your userpage but it cannot be blanked. This does not stop the deletion process. Add your comments to the discussion above. Again, do not blank your userpage or remove the MFD tag. Thanks. CommanderLinx (talk) 09:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CommanderLinx, be so nice and kindly don't interfere to my userpage, because this would be pointess. I am still here. Thank you ;)Waenceslaus (talk) 18:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please stop reverting my edit to the List of Norwegian supercentenarians page. I have every right to remove the table as the names have had "citation needed" tags in place in place since August 2011 . In over three years, no source has been added to these names. Please read WP:VERIFIABILITY which states that unsourced information can be removed. If you insist on reverting my edits, then you will need to add the relevant sources as per WP:BURDEN. If you cannot find sources, then the information does not belong on Wikipedia. CommanderLinx (talk) 16:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove everything, no citations will ever be added. Yet the talbe has been developed by professionals. Talk to those, who contributed by the creation of it. Ask about their opinion before erasing their work. I only don't want to allow to this. What "right" do you have anyway? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which anybody can edit (and reedit). The goal of Wikipedia is to educate the society. What education will be with erasing the content of pages?

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Polish supercentenarians

added a link pointing to Łubno

List of supercentenarians born in the Russian Empire

added a link pointing to Łubno

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of African supercentenarians

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of African supercentenarians, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.wiki2.org/wiki/List_of_African_supercentenarians.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of African supercentenarians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of List of supercentenarians from Africa

A tag has been placed on List of supercentenarians from Africa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to List of Polish supercentenarians

Do not re-add the table or remove tags unless you find sources that specifically state that "<name here> was/is oldest in Poland from death of <othernamehere>" as per WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Note that a GRG list is not good enough nor is a birth record. The source must state what I mentioned earlier. I suggest you read those Wiki policies. CommanderLinx (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What don't you understand? The sources are not good enough for that table because they do not state "person X was oldest from death of person Y". I've told you this several times. Again, do NOT restore the table unless you have an appropriate source. My edits are not " destructive", WP:VERIFIABILITY clearly states that unsourced information may be removed. Do not restore the table or you may be blocked for disruptive editing. CommanderLinx (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you need to be told multiple times, but unless you have a source that states "person X is the oldest living person in Poland from death of person Y" then the table does NOT belong on Wikipedia. Using a GRG table is not good enough. I strongly suggest you read WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Do NOT restore this table until you have an appropriate source or I will have to report this to ANI. CommanderLinx (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 24 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of German supercentenarians page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People

I reverted your edits at Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People. The RSN discussion was closed with that analysis. Ignoring it is not a long-term way to resolve these issues. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People, you may be blocked from editing. The WOP doesn't get to make up its own guidelines and ignore all discussion within the rest of Wikipedia. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 08:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure to tell everyone to oppose your ban and support banning those idiots. I already posted it to the WOP page but we need to flood the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.51.185 (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User 166.170.51.185, I am not listening to your comments, because you are not trustworthy with the low language, that you use. I'd suggest you not to interfere, unless you decide to use proper scientific language. Sincerely, Waenceslaus (talk) 21:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Topic-banned

This is to inform you that, as per the consensus in the ANI thread referred to above, you are now indefinitely topic-banned from all edits related to longevity, including (but not limited to) all edits at WP:WikiProject World's Oldest People and discussions about it, as well as articles in its scope. This sanction will be listed at WP:RESTRICT and can be appealed as outlined there. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So you went right ahead and broke the topic ban with this [1] edit? I won't block you for this one just yet, but do take this as a final warning. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are not a member of WP:WikiProject World's Oldest People, you have no right to decide who can and can't edit there. 67.191.53.129 (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Future Perfect at Sunrise, this is an assumption from your side. It happened so soon, that I still wasn't aware of the ban at the time I made the edit. By the way, my edit was in accordance with the truth, while the person, who reverted it, namely USer:CommanderLinx has input false information. Someone please check the news and revert his edit.

User:67.191.53.129, your information is incorrect. You can see here: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_World%27s_Oldest_People#Participants), that I am a member of Wikipedia WOP project. If you have any complaint against me, I'd appreciate if we discussed it in an equal discussion user and user, not user and an anonymous IP. Otherwise, I can't continue the discussion with you. I hope you understand. Kind regards, Waenceslaus (talk) 08:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Waenceslaus, my edit wasn't actually to add false information, but to revert you because you are topic banned and shouldn't have actually touched the page in the first place. Someone else fixed up the page and removed the name so it's all sorted now. No need for me to discuss this further. CommanderLinx (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:CommanderLinx, this does not free you from thinking. Please, pay greater attention in your edits. Have a nice day. Waenceslaus (talk) 10:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC) ArbCom looked at the case again and they had no mention of your topic ban. Just something to think about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.176.59.18 (talk) 06:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:166.176.59.18 Go away, troll. I'm only topic-banned. I can still edit other areas of Wikipedia. Waenceslaus (talk) 23:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chrząszczewska Island

Thanks for that entry. Please see the article and it's talk page for maintenance edits (categories, wikiproject template) - I encourage you add them yourself to your future articles. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amendment request

Your amendment request to your unopened Requests for Arbitration case has been archived at WT:Arbitration/Requests#Amendment request: Waenceslaus. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 13:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleksandra Dranka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleksandra Dranka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandra Dranka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 11:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of supercentenarians from Asia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of supercentenarians from Asia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supercentenarians from Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of supercentenarians from the Nordic countries for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of supercentenarians from the Nordic countries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supercentenarians from the Nordic countries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of supercentenarians of the Caribbean for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of supercentenarians of the Caribbean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supercentenarians of the Caribbean until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of supercentenarians born in Austria-Hungary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of supercentenarians born in Austria-Hungary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supercentenarians born in Austria-Hungary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of supercentenarians born in the Russian Empire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of supercentenarians born in the Russian Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supercentenarians born in the Russian Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 04:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Czech supercentenarians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Czech supercentenarians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Czech supercentenarians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 12:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Waenceslaus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Per your successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee mailing list, I have unblocked you and removed the "blocked" tag from your userpage. As you know from the email thread, you are indefinitely restricted to using a single account, and your topic ban from August 2015 continues to apply. I will record these conditions at WP:EDR momentarily. Good luck, and happy editing. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that your very first article edits after your unblock were to create a new article on a supercentennarian, and I wonder why you thought this didn't violate your existing topic ban on longevity. Please have a look at my note at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Waenceslaus unblocked following successful appeal. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maria Roszak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maria Roszak, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 12:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

I have blocked you for one week for clear violation of your topic ban on edits related to longevity. A note have also been posted on ANI. If you have any comments to make in response to the section on ANI, post it here for someone to copy over. -- KTC (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Banned by the community

Per consensus in this ANI discussion, you are banned from editing English Wikipedia, and your account has been blocked indefinitely. You may wish to review the banning policy. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:49, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maria Roszak

On 3 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria Roszak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Polish nun and supercentenarian Maria Roszak was named a Righteous Among the Nations for helping shelter Jewish refugees during the Holocaust? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Roszak. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maria Roszak), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]