Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions
→January 3: Jeff Baena |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Short description|Page for suggesting items for "In |
<noinclude>{{Short description|Page for suggesting items for "In The News"}}</noinclude> |
||
{{notice|<big>Welcome to ''In the news''. Please '''[[Wikipedia:In the news|read the guidelines]]'''. Admin instructions are '''[[Wikipedia:In the news/Administrator instructions|here]]'''.</big>}}{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/header}} |
{{notice|<big>Welcome to ''In the news''. Please '''[[Wikipedia:In the news|read the guidelines]]'''. Admin instructions are '''[[Wikipedia:In the news/Administrator instructions|here]]'''.</big>}}{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/header}} |
||
{{Skip to top and bottom}} |
{{Skip to top and bottom}} |
||
== Archives == |
== Archives == |
||
{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/Archives}} |
{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/Archives}} |
||
{{Anchor|Suggestions}} |
|||
Archives of posted stories: [[Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives]] |
|||
== September 14 == |
|||
{{Anchor|Nominations}} |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2022 September 14]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2022 September 14}} |
|||
== Sections == |
|||
This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary. |
|||
{{section sizes}} |
|||
---- |
|||
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
|||
== January 4 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2025 January 4]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2025 January 4}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
||
==== |
==== RD: Tomiko Itooka ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Tomiko Itooka |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www. |
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/04/world/asia/oldest-person-dies-japan.html NYT] |
||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = TJMSmith <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = ThadeusOfNazereth |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| |
| updaters = Jake11223344, INgIEroC |
||
| nom cmt = Japanese supercentenarian. Date death announced. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 09:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] ([[User talk:TJMSmith|talk]]) 15:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Comment''' Tomiko Itooka was the oldest living person as well at the time of her death, and we've generally posted these supercentenarian when they are at the top. Although, its not there yet. [[User:TheCorriynial|TheCorriynial]] ([[User talk:TheCorriynial|talk]]) 16:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' article seems good to go. [[User:Alsoriano97|_-_Alsor]] ([[User talk:Alsoriano97|talk]]) |
|||
* Posting, excellent article. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* I remember discussion on Vangelis, I think, here where it was said that she fits the threshold for blurb more. Now that id posted, propose '''blurb'''. Golden Lion Award, Berlin International Film Festival win, starred in Zorba the Greek film. [https://greekherald.com.au/news/legendary-greek-actress-irene-papas-passes-away-aged-96/] [[User:Кирилл С1|Kirill C1]] ([[User talk:Кирилл С1|talk]]) 10:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) 2024–25 Ethiopian earthquakes ==== |
|||
====Astana==== |
|||
{{atop|A consensus to post at this point will not develop. Consider nominating again if this becomes bigger. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 12:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = 2024–25 Ethiopian earthquakes |
||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = [[Kazakhstan]] announces change to name of capital from '''[[Astana|Nur-sultan back to Astana]]''' |
|||
| blurb = Signs of a volcanic eruption appears in [[Awash Fentale (woreda)|Awash Fentale]] in [[Afar Region]]. |
|||
| altblurb = [[Kazakhstan]] announces the changing of their capital city's name from Nur-Sultan to its former name of '''[[Astana]]'''. |
|||
| recent deaths = |
|||
| nom cmt = This is unique and I believe encyclopedic (as well as political). The last I can think of such an event is St Petersburg > Leningrad > St Petersburg and took over decades rather than 3 years. |
|||
| ongoing = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/14/kazakhstan-to-change-name-of-capital-from-nur-sultan-back-to-astana The Guardian] |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| ITNR = no |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| nominator = Abcmaxx |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| updaters = Romeowth, Rosguill |
|||
| sources = [https://english.alarabiya.net/News/world/2025/01/03/risk-of-ethiopian-volcano-eruption-prompts-evacuation-of-residents- Al Alarabiya English], [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy3zvvn1vyo BBC News] |
|||
| sign = [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 09:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = AsteriodX <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = AsteriodX |
|||
| updaters = AsteriodX |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:AsteriodX|AsteriodX]] ([[User talk:AsteriodX|talk]]) 05:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Oppose''' three months of low-level activity damaging 100 houses. Not significant enough. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 05:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* I would support posting but the update is one-sentence. Changing the name of the capital is a rare event, and yes, there is a political backstory. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 09:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Stephen. Little to no unusually major impact thus far. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 06:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' on significance, '''oppose''' on quality; the update needs to be more significant first. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 10:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Stephen, doesn't meet [[WP:ITNSIGNIF]]. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 12:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Country capital information has been all encyclopedias' hottest selling point for generations and I think the entire article now repeating "Astana" instead of "Nur-sultan" is enough of an update to hammer the idea home, geographically. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 11:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{abottom}} |
|||
* '''Wait''' – Developing. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 12:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* Noting that this is not a unique event in the history of this city; this is the ''[https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Astana sixth]'' time a name change has happened here, all in just the last sixty years. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 14:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' Countries don't exactly change their national capitals' names all that often. Article needs some work however. [[User:The Kip|The Kip]] ([[User talk:The Kip|talk]]) 15:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Ineresting trivia, but 1) there's no actual geopolitical importance, 2) this is the fourth time they've changed the name just since Kazakhstan became independent, and 3) the article update is completely insufficient for a main page posting. -- [[User:Kicking222|Kicking222]] ([[User talk:Kicking222|talk]]) 16:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' just trivia. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] <small>([[User talk:The Rambling Man|Keep wearing the mask...]])</small> 17:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak Support upon Quality Improvement''' it's interesting and encyclopedic, but currently the article includes no rationale why the name was changed again besides the trivial statement that some members of parliament requested it. If there were to be more (sourced) informations e.g. relating to how the current president of Kazhakstan [[Kassym-Jomart Tokayev]] is striving to erase the symbols of former president [[Nursultan Nazarbayev]], then I'd be more enclined to support. In any case, this could alternatively also feature on DYK? [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 17:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== January 3 == |
||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/ |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2025 January 3]]}} |
||
{{Portal:Current events/ |
{{Portal:Current events/2025 January 3}} |
||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== RD: |
==== RD: Jeff Baena ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Jeff Baena |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https:// |
| sources = [https://people.com/jeff-baena-writer-director-aubrey-plaza-husband-dead-at-47-8769239 People Magazine] |
||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = TJMSmith <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = Zujine |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| updaters = 98.173.178.246, Simonthings18, DiaMali, Jolielover |
|||
| nom cmt = English footballer |
|||
| nom cmt = American screenwriter and film director. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 09:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] ([[User talk:TJMSmith|talk]]) 16:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==== 2025 PDC World Darts Championship ==== |
|||
*'''Support''' article is fine and referenced, however would be great if there was an expansion on his non-league football managerial career and the years were added of his time at [[Enfield F.C.|Enfield]] both as player and manager. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 10:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', Article is fine. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 15:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====RD: Susan L. Solomon==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = 2025 PDC World Darts Championship |
||
| image = Luke Littler.png |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = In darts, [[Luke Littler]] (pictured) wins the '''[[2025 PDC World Darts Championship]]'''. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/13/health/susan-l-solomon-dead.html ''The New York Times''] |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| nominator = Bloom6132 |
|||
| ITNR = yes <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| updaters = Bloom6132 |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| nom cmt = First reported today (September 13); died on September 8. |
|||
| sign = —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 02:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
====(Posted) RD: Ken Starr ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Ken Starr |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.kwtx.com/2022/09/13/scholar-gentleman-former-baylor-president-clinton-investigator-ken-starr-dead-76/ KWTX] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Muboshgu <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = Muboshgu , TDKR Chicago 101 <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Support RD''' - probably not blurb worthy though. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17">nableezy</span>]]''' - 21:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
**No, certainly no blurb here. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 22:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' well sourced, thorough, better than most wikibios we post. Old man dies who had some household name recognition decades ago, yeah, sounds like the reference case for RD for me, really can't imagine supporting a blurb for an individual in that case. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 23:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 01:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== Blue Origin NS-23 mission failure ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Blue Origin NS-23 |
|||
| blurb = The '''[[Blue Origin NS-23|23rd flight]]''' of Blue Origin's [[New Shepard]] spacecraft results in complete mission failure following a booster failure |
|||
| ITNR = yes |
|||
| altblurb = The '''[[Blue Origin NS-23|23rd flight]]''' of Blue Origin's [[New Shepard]] spacecraft results in a booster failure and a successful execution of its launch escape system |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
||
| sources = [https:// |
| sources = [https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/darts/articles/clyx7403y9ko BBC Sport] [https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/2025/jan/03/luke-littler-v-michael-van-gerwen-pdc-world-darts-championship-final-live The Guardian] |
||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = OZOO <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = |
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
||
| sign = [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
* '''<s>Comment</s> Oppose''' – A non-event. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 15:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Comment''' Article almost exclusively is about the failure of the mission and only briefly mentions mission objectives. I think if we are going to post this, ITN/R or not, there must be more information in the article about the potential impacts. All we have currently is that the booster was destroyed and the mission presumably delayed. What are the the impacts of this failure that have this rise to a ITN level of concern? I do believe most readers would question the exact significance of the failure of a non-crewed sub-orbital flight such as this one. [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 16:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Added some additional information, but significance is presumed through ITNR. It is also the first time that a New Shepard rocket has had complete mission failure. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 16:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Perhaps if it was manned or the first mission, but neither, so unimportant. [[User:The Kip|The Kip]] ([[User talk:The Kip|talk]]) 16:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{tq|The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post.}} [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 16:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::[[WP:IAR]] -- [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 16:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::IAR should only be in exceptional circumstances, where the PAG can't reasonably have accounted for the circumstances; The Kip's position appears to reject the majority of stories that would be posting under this part of ITNR, which means the circumstances aren't exceptional and IAR doesn't apply. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 16:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::<small>Thank you for affirming your faithful adherence to the sacred ITN Catechism. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 17:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*:::::<small>If we want to be able to reject ITNR, we should note that they are subject to some discussion about significance - otherwise, the instructions are clear that {{tq|Items listed there are considered exempt from having to prove their notability through discussion on the candidates page.}} [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 22:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - I think this is a rare instance in which the encyclopedia [[WP:IAR|is not best served]] by inclusion of this story.--'''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 17:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{ping|WaltCip}} Previously, you said {{tq|I think this needs to be codified somewhere: '''ITN/R is ''not a guideline and there are no exceptions''.''' Any attempts to treat it as such by opposing an ITN/R item based on notability, usually with the accompanying argument of [[WP:IAR]], should itself be ''ignored''.}} Has your opinion changed? [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 22:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::I'm never too old to learn, and in this case, I [[WP:CLUE|got a clue]] and determined that my previous opinion was wrong. '''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 11:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - one thing to keep in mind here, is that it was a sub-orbital rocket, not designed or planned to orbit the earth. Looking at other launch failures that were featured; [[Soyuz MS-10]] in 2018 had a crew on board, that survived ballistic re-entry, and were recovered over 400 km from the pad. The Falcon 9 carrying [[AMOS-6 (satellite)]] in 2016 blew up on the pad in a massive explosion, all but destroying [[Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 40|LC-40]] and was felt over 60 km away! In this case we have only a sub-orbital rocket, no large explosion, and the capsule landed safe and intact. The booster didn't land successfully - but the article doesn't really say much as to it's fate, other than it hit the ground; elsewhere I've seen reports that it was providing telemetry until it's unsuccessful landing. So no humans, not orbital, payload survived, no damage to the launch pad, and no information about the booster landing zone. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 19:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*{{s|'''Reluctant Regrettable Support''' I have no idea what an unknown number of people were thinking when they agreed every launch failure with enough details to update an article is automatically good enough, but they did and the article's updated, so let's just get this subjectively bad idea over with. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 23:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
*'''Support''' -- it's ITNR. Maybe it shouldn't be, but it is, so it needs to be posted, otherwise the point of ITNR is moot. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 00:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:ITNC entries that are based on ITNR can still be debated if '''that specific entry''' is important enough to post, just we don't want people rehashing the "is the ITNR appropriate?" here on ITNC. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 00:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::I don't follow. The phrase "each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post" seems to preclude any discussion about whether the event is important enough to post. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 00:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Yes, {{tq|Items which are listed on this page are considered to have already satisfied the 'importance' criterion for inclusion on ITN, every time they occur.}} Not every second time, not every other time, just every time. All anyone who doesn't like it but wants to follow the rules can hope to accomplish is to convince the room the article isn't "appropriately" updated (whatever that means). [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 00:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::We have, in the past, skipped posting ITNR items for various reasons that were beyond quality issues. The point that we have this allowance to skip a singular ITNR instance, as long as we aren't wasting the effort about the base ITNR criteria. Major crashes of spacecraft can be significant, but you can see by the way the news is covering this that this crash of an unmanned commercial rocket wasn't really a major event. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 03:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Neither are plenty of R things. They don't need to be, they just need to recur and constitute an '''appropriate''' update to a nominated article without orangetags. If you can think of a good reason unrelated to importance to skip this one, I'd ''love to'' get on board, seriously. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 04:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::If it is true that we have skipped posting ITNR items for various reasons unrelated to quality or whether it actually satisfies ITNR criteria, then there's something wrong, and we should change our policies. If ITNR criteria can simply be discarded because we [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT|don't like it]] or think it's appropriate, then we might as well just get rid of ITNR entirely. This being said, I'd support updating ITNR criteria for launches to require that the failure occur with a ''manned'' launch. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 04:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::: [[WP:ITN/R]] is a [[WP:GUIDELINE|guideline]] not a rigid rule. Right at the top it says "''it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply''". [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 09:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::: Then the wording needs to be changed, as that is not what it currently says. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 09:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per ITN/R and marked ready. Update is sufficient. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 01:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:I'm removing the ready tag, it may be technically ready to post but there isn't even a remote degree of consensus to do so. There's a grand total of six votes overall, and it's 50/50 between oppose and support. [[User:The Kip|The Kip]] ([[User talk:The Kip|talk]]) 02:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::57/43. You can assume the nominator supports. In addition, [[WP:DETCON|consensus is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Wikipedia policy]]. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 02:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Opposes which disregard the [[WP:ITNR]] guidelines are invalid. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 16:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:: Adding it back. There's no need to form consensus for notability, since it's ITN/R. I've yet to see anyone oppose on the basis that the article is not in an acceptable state. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 03:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*Can this really be described as "complete mission failure" if most of the payload was recoverable? - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 06:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' on quality and also notability. Quality-wise, per DarkSide830, it lacks information on the mission beyond the details of its failure. Also oppose on notability per those above. ITN/R is not a suicide pact, and there is no part of the project where IAR doesn't apply (it's even [[WP:5P5|one of the five pillars]]). Per above, this is one of those rare cases where something that's ITN/R nonetheless fails to reach the significance bar. It's a relatively insignificant story that won't materially affect that company's programme or anything else in the longterm, and our readers wouldn't particularly be well served by its inclusion at ITN. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 08:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. I also think that ITNR is not a must. This was a failure of a rather routine mission that did not carry crew (luckily) or some particularly important equipment, like JW telescope (also luckily). We should probably amend ITNR criteria. I suggest this is sent to DYK instead, the article is decent enough. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 08:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - I don't think this falls under [[WP:ITNR]]; launch failures are listed under the "space exploration" heading but this was a suborbital launch, and thus it's dubious to what degree this counts as "space exploration". Including this only begs the question of where the line is drawn. Would a failed weather balloon launch count? I agree with the sentiment that this item would be better suited to DYK. [[User:HumanBodyPiloter5|HumanBodyPiloter5]] ([[User talk:HumanBodyPiloter5|talk]]) 09:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:I'll buy that, this was space ''trucking'', '''Oppose'''. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 09:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:If the launch hadn't failed it terminates above [[Kármán line]], which means that it is space exploration; weather balloons don't go anywhere near that high. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 09:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::Altitude aside, cargo can't [[explore]], especially when only going somewhere its shipping company has gone 22 times before. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 10:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::The cargo was experiments, intended to be run in space. Such experiments are part of space exploration. In addition, look at our [[Space_exploration#First_outer_space_flights|article on space exploration]]. Reaching the Kármán line is considered part of it. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 10:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::Such experiments are part of space research, no doubt, which I guess might pass for exploration in an inner intellectual sense. And maybe that T-2 Mission Arroway ''could have'' felt some base rush of actual firsthand pioneering. Tough to say, my furred friend, but I'm not flipping twice on this. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 10:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Just as a note, the original discussion which led to the space rules in their present form is [[Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news/Recurring_items/Archive_5#Replacement_of_"Space_Exploration"_criteria|here, from 2011]]. This was a reduction in scope from a much broader "any space flight" that was there before, but it actually looks like [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Recurring_items&diff=prev&oldid=454942270 the version that was written] as a result of that discussion is not quite the one that had consensus in the discussion. The initial suggestion at the discussion was for "'''Orbital''' launch failures where sufficient details are available to update the article" (emphasis mine), with one or two users also saying that all launch failures should be left to ITN/C. Nobody suggested automatically including all launch failures, including those that weren't orbital, but that's what was inserted. I'd suggest revisiting this ASAP to be honest. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 10:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' The WP:ITN/R entry is "''Launch failures where sufficient details are available to update the article''". This is poorly drafted as <u>all</u> nominations obviously require such sufficient details. And so the only meaningful bit is "launch failures". But these are commonplace – the repeated [[Artemis_1#Launch_attempts|launch failures]] of [[Artemis 1]] are a fresh example. We therefore have to discuss whether a particular failure is significant or not and so this shouldn't be ITN/R. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 09:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Same response as to sca above; if we want to be able to reject ITNR, we should note that they are subject to some discussion about significance - otherwise, the instructions are clear that {{tq|Items listed there are considered exempt from having to prove their notability through discussion on the candidates page.}} [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 09:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::[[WP:ITN/R]] is a [[WP:GUIDELINE|guideline]] not a rigid rule. It says "''it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply''". The only way we can use our common sense and establish whether this is an exception is to discuss the details of the case. That's what we're doing here. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 10:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Except it is very unambiguous. If it is not a rigid rule, then it shouldn't say {{tq|Items listed there are considered exempt from having to prove their notability through discussion on the candidates page}} and {{tq|Items which are listed on this page are considered to have already satisfied the 'importance' criterion for inclusion on ITN, every time they occur.}} [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 10:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::But that applies to any guideline (or indeed policy) anywhere on the project. Most such "rules" are worded in clear language that would appear at first sight to discount exceptions, yet IAR applies if appropriate nonetheless. And the idea that IAR would be a principle applied right across the project, covering almost all of our content and conduct conventions, but somehow not apply in one single hallowed corner of the Wiki known as ITN/R, seems a bit ludicrous when you think about it. For most purposes ITN/R is a "rigid rule", but occasional exceptions apply. The bottom line is that if enough editors feel that there are special reasons why a particular item should be IARed, as appears to be the case here, then a consensus doesn't form and it doesn't get posted. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 10:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Most other guidelines aren't written with the same strength of language. In addition, IAR should only be in exceptional circumstances, where the PAG can't reasonably have accounted for the circumstances. Given that the reasons for rejecting this launch failure would apply to most launch failures, IAR can't apply. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 10:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::: [[WP:NOTLAW]] explains that "''...it is not governed by statute ... the written rules themselves do not set accepted practice. Rather, they document already-existing community consensus regarding what should be accepted and what should be rejected. ... Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the letter of policies without consideration for their principles. If the rules truly prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, ignore them. Disagreements are resolved through consensus-based discussion, not by tightly sticking to rules and procedures. Furthermore, policies and guidelines themselves may be changed to reflect evolving consensus.''" So, what we have here is an evolving consensus and [[WP:ITN/R]] seems to require further adjustment to reflect this. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 10:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::: Lets see how this closes, but if it does close against posting then you are right; ITNR (and [[Wikipedia:In the news#Sports and other recurring events]], and the template above) would need adjustment. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 10:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::::I would argue a discussion here is not sufficient enough to override ITN/R. Per [[WP:CONLEVEL]], this wouldn't be sufficient because the stability and consistency of guidelines are important. Any change must be made conservatively and slowly while seeking the input of others. A driveby discussion on a matter such as this is not sufficient to change the ITN/R guideline. [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 11:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*'''Support''' It's ITN/R... It has been said before. If you don't like it being on ITN/R, then start a discussion on the talkpage to remove or amend the topic. Notability is assumed for anything on the ITN/R list and thus it's notability is not a question here. The only issue we can debate on an ITN/R topic is quality, which the article meets since it has been updated. I will note that the ITN/R guideline has a broader level of consensus then any discussion here so we can't just override it. Drive by discussions are not sufficient to change the ITN/R guideline itself. Therefore, this must be posted whether we like it or not. |
|||
:[[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 11:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::* Discussions at ITN/R seem to get less attention than discussions here and it's usually a subset of the same editors. For example, we've been here before with [[Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates/May_2015#%5BClosed%5D_Proton-M_crash|Proton M]]. That nomination failed to launch so there was then a [[Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news/Recurring_items/Archive_16#%5BClosed%5D_Proposal%3A_Adjust_failed_launches_listing|discussion at ITN/R]]. That fizzled too. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::I remind you of [[WP:NOTBURO]]. Also: Do you yourself believe that this story would be significant for posting on ITN, regardless of whether or not it's a recurring item? '''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 12:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' on significance, noting {{u|Amakuru}}s point about this not being an orbital launch. <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 11:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Comment''' – A day later, 3:1 consensus appears to have formed against posting. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 14:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
**Opposes which disregard the guidelines are invalid --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 16:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' in addition to being [[WP:ITNR]] there is a "please do not" above which reads "oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. The criteria can be discussed at the relevant talk page.". Not posting this at this point is anarchy. Either the guidelines exist or they do not. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 16:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Consensus is trending away from posting unmanned launch failures on [[WT:ITN]]. Even if this item were "ready" as you keep insisting that it is, it would be pulled almost immediately after posting. '''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 16:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' I think you could argue whether or not this qualifies as ITNR; if it is, then ITNR rules (again) need to be redone in regards to spaceflight. Either way, this is a non-event in which an unmanned ship wasn't destroyed and didn't hurt anyone. -- [[User:Kicking222|Kicking222]] ([[User talk:Kicking222|talk]]) 17:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted to RD) Blurb/RD: Jean-Luc Godard ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Jean-Luc Godard |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/new-wave-film-director-jean-luc-godard-has-died-paper-2022-09-13/ Reuters] |
|||
| updated = |
|||
| image = Jean-Luc Godard at Berkeley, 1968.jpg |
|||
| blurb = French filmmaker '''[[Jean-Luc Godard]]''' ''(pictured)'' dies at the age of 91. |
|||
| altblurb = French filmmaker '''[[Jean-Luc Godard]]''' ''(pictured)'' commits [[assisted suicide]] at the age of 91. |
|||
| nominator = Mooonswimmer <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = ITNR sporting final.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Pioneering filmmaker. Quite a few references missing, as there are completely unsourced sections. Filmography page poorly sourced. |
|||
| sign = [[User: |
| sign = [[User:OZOO|OZOO]] [[User talk:OZOO|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/OZOO|(c)]] 22:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Comment''' I've [[WP:BOLD|boldly]] bolded the target article since it was missing bolding per ITN norm. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 23:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' The issues mentioned in the nom exist and need to be fixed, though the filmography page's condition should not hold this back it should be brought upto par as well. Support when the issues are resolved and also support blurb here, with the extraordinary influence in cinema that Godard has had. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 10:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Article is currently '''not ready''' since some parts <s>is still in future tense (Overview)</s> and has some sourcing issues (Most subheadings under qualifications). [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 23:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Support''' Tried to fix the most glaring issues and main tags. Also support due to the nature of the death which was not apparent when it was first reported. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 01:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Comment''' – Widely covered by Eng. RS sites. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 11:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support blurb/photo RD''' - passes Mandela/Thatcher test, post as blurb/photo RD if article quality is sufficient for posting. [[Special:Contributions/130.75.182.245|130.75.182.245]] ([[User talk:130.75.182.245|talk]]) 12:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:He is not even remotely close to the "Mandela/Thatcher test". I hadn't even heard of this guy prior to seeing this nomination. Which obviously doesn't prove anything in itself, but it does strongly suggest to me that he's not a Thatcher or Mandela. Surprising as it may seem, I'd heard of those guys by the time of their deaths. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 16:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support RD''' Article is of decent enough quality, death does not require additional explanation that a blurb would provide, so RD is sufficient. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 12:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Except that a blurb would provide the extra information that it was an assisted suicide.-- [[User:Pawnkingthree|Pawnkingthree]] ([[User talk:Pawnkingthree|talk]]) 20:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*I would be open to seeing this blurbed if everything in the article was properly cited. ~[[User:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 12:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' - incredibly important filmmaker, and bottom two blurbs on homepage are over a week old, so no issue pushing one of them out. [[User:El cid, el campeador|<span style="color:black">'''‡ El cid, el campeador'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:el cid, el campeador|<span style="color:teal">talk</span>]]</sup> 14:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose on quality''' Article needs ref work in three big sections of the article. Once the issues have been addressed, I'd support a blurb. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 16:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' One of the most important filmmakers of all time. [[User:The Kip|The Kip]] ([[User talk:The Kip|talk]]) 16:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Aren't all tables under the "Schedule" section violations of [[MOS:COLHEAD]]? Would this hinder it being posted? [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 23:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb on quality fixes''' I would recommend fleshing out the legacy section which should be easy with the long form obits coming in. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 17:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: MOS issues are generally a yellow "cleanup" tag issue, which doesn't prevent this from running, as only orange tags do. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 12:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' Definitely not in the same class as Tarkovsky but still a significant and highly influential filmmaker. I’d like to see more death blurbs for film directors.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 19:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose Blurb''' no where near the impact of Gorbachev or the recognition of Elizabeth II no media circus absolutely no reason at all to bump a blurb out of the box for this. 100% what RD is for. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 19:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*It is a widely covered and reported death, media circus and bumping other blurbs should not be a criterion. Besides the unnatural reason for the death making the act itself further notable. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 01:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*:Bumping blurbs out of the box and looking like an obit was the whole reason RD was created so it is in fact a most critical criteria --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 01:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*::We cannot control when two rather significant and influential people die, just as we can't control when disasters happen back to back. That's the nature of news. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb'''. A hugely influential director, certainly one of the most important in post-war Europe. —''[[User:Brigade Piron|Brigade Piron]]'' ([[User talk:Brigade Piron|talk]]) 20:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' once issues are addressed. This is somebody highly influential and who was absolutely at the top of their field. You could even argue the death itself is notable as Godard may be the most high-profile person yet to die by assisted suicide. I would suggest "dies by assisted suicide" as the wording rather than "commits", though, as that wording is contentious. [[User:Humbledaisy|Humbledaisy]] ([[User talk:Humbledaisy|talk]]) 22:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:''Both'' wordings are contentious. That's the whole reason people continually pit one against the other, instead of going with a third option. To me, he "kills himself". [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 23:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:I think "dies by" is a better option here to avoid any contention. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 01:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::If "dies by" is supposed to avoid contention, why would Googling "died by suicide" bring up ''far'' more stories about the contest itself than stories about particular suicides? [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 01:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::I supported that option as quite a few dicts do not recommend the usage (e.g. [https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/commit-suicide], [https://www.thefreedictionary.com/commit+suicide]), [[MOS:SUICIDE]] also provides for the alternative usage. Personally I am not opposed to either. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 01:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::Pardon the expression, but I got it, bro. There are ''two'' sides to this either/or issue. Anyone on either has valid reasons to me, but don't tell me it's not worth fighting for! From the outside, ''everyone'' knows ''that'' much is "true enough", eh? [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 02:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Photo RD''' There's almost no story here, it's an honour. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 23:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' on quality, oppose blurb--definitely not meeting the blurb threshold in my opinion. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 23:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*Think it's good to go now. Fixed the glaring referencing issues (also a more recent image would be preferable but the latest on Commons is a grainy one from more than a decade ago, if someone can provide one that would be great). There should be more detail on the assisted suicide itself but don't think much has been reported on the fact as of now. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 01:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Between you and me, it's a drug overdose, a lethal injection of a sodium pentobarbitol solution, but good luck finding an entertainment journalist with "the right words" for that, especially if they're writing for an audience which associates public death administration, killer drugs and even the term "[[Suicide Solution]]" with a depraved sort of criminality unbefitting ''this'' beloved artist-turned-legend. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 02:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::Given that assisted suicide is legal (to a degree) in Switzerland, we should not be trying to make that a political point in the blurb. He died regardless of the means, there's no need to go into the ''why''. (Outside of assassinations or unnatural causes, we never otherwise put the blurb in about the means of death, and that helps us to stay neutral on issues like this). [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 02:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::It's not about politics, it's about mixing medical terms with lay terms. "Drug overdose" reads like an accident to Joe, Jane or Jimmy Average, and "lethal injection" suggests a homicide (ergo, to some, murder most foul). This was not a natural death at all, this was a suicide, caused by drugs and to which many issues plausibly significantly contributed. It sounds worse than it is. So yeah, the less we share or care to know, the better, ''this time''. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 02:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' provided any quality issues are addressed - One of the most significant film makers of all time. Obvious major story. [[User:HumanBodyPiloter5|HumanBodyPiloter5]] ([[User talk:HumanBodyPiloter5|talk]]) 09:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''', Notable person and article is fine. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 15:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose blurb''' - not even remotely of the calibre at which we blurb an RD. Come on, the standards haven't changed this much. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 16:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose blurb''' - We don't blurb really good filmmakers.--'''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 16:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD''' I'm not sure there's sufficient support to blurb nor sufficient opposition to close the nomination, but the article is in fine shape, so RD is certainly acceptable. -- [[User:Kicking222|Kicking222]] ([[User talk:Kicking222|talk]]) 17:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' - he was the most influential film maker alive. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:908:675:8D00:F4B8:EC9B:6EA2:29A9|2A02:908:675:8D00:F4B8:EC9B:6EA2:29A9]] ([[User talk:2A02:908:675:8D00:F4B8:EC9B:6EA2:29A9|talk]]) 17:41, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: |
==== RD: Britt Allcroft ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Britt Allcroft |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www. |
| sources = [https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/britt-allcroft-thomas-tank-engine-dies-b1202797.html Evening Standard] |
||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Ollieisanerd <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = 66.185.84.206 |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| updaters = TheStarSwitcher |
|||
| nom cmt = Australian Aboriginal actor. I've done a pass through to add missing refs - |
|||
| nom cmt = Date death announced. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 06:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Ollieisanerd|<span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #007FFF; color: #98FB98;">Ollieisanerd</span>]] ([[User talk:Ollieisanerd|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ollieisanerd|contribs]]) 16:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''' - |
*'''Support''' - Meets ITN RD requirements, appears ready. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 13:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Where's the citation for two paragraphs in her career section? '''[[User:TNM101|<span style="color:red;">TNM</span><span style="color:black;">101</span>]]''' ([[User talk:TNM101|<span style="color:blue;">chat</span>]]) 15:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== (Closed) Devastating eruption located ==== |
||
{{atop|SNOW closing (volcanic winter snow?), since there is a clear consensus that this will not get posted. If expanded enough, DYK is a good alternative. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Zavaritski Caldera |
||
| image = Simushir ISS006-E-24468.jpg |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = The '''[[Zavaritski Caldera|site of the volcanic eruption]]''' ''(pictured)'' which caused blue suns and global famine has been identified. |
|||
| blurb = In television, ''[[Ted Lasso]]'' wins [[Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Comedy Series|best comedy]] and ''[[Succession (TV series)|Succession]]'' wins [[Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series|best drama]] at the '''[[74th Primetime Emmy Awards|Emmy Awards]]'''. |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
||
| ITNR = |
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
||
| sources = [https://www.science.org/content/article/ice-cores-finger-obscure-pacific-volcano-cause-19th-century-climate-disaster AAAS], [https://www.jpost.com/science/science-around-the-world/article-835651 Jerusalem Post] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/awards/live-blog/emmy-awards-2022-live-updates-rcna47301 NBC News] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Andrew Davidson <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
||
| updaters = Wtmitchell |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = A long-standing mystery has been solved. There's still work to do on expanding the article and updating related topics such as [[Graham Island (Mediterranean Sea)|Graham Island]] and [[Little Ice Age volcanism]]. Those who measure significance by deaths should note that the resulting famines such as the [[Tenpō famine]] caused hundreds of thousands of deaths. |
|||
| nom cmt = There still need to be a few parts about the ceremony (In Memorandum) that needs to be updated but there ''is'' prose. Also probably a few firsts to document as well. |
|||
| sign = [[ |
| sign = [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
:'''Oppose the blurb''': Average reader would not understand what is this even about, at least in first few glances. Blue suns? Should be wikilinked, googling it gives weird things. Which global famine(s)? Too vague. If it is about some 1831 global climate catastrophe, does Wikipedia have an article about or related to it? Googling 'Zavaritski Caldera' on news tab currently only serves one news item by daily mail. It should first be reported by few major general news media outlets so that we may 'it is in news'. I don't say it is not interesting, but very confusing. {{User:ExclusiveEditor/Signature}} 11:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Lots of incorrect tense, talking about the event in the future. And the details seem rather dated and tired as we had Ted Lasso last year too, which wasn't posted. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 10:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: The meteorological use of [[Blue sun]] doesn't have an article, but it probably could, there's enough material out there i.e. [https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/969/2021/]. Meanwhile, the article is a stub and I don't see it significantly in the news at the moment. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 12:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:We cannot control if a show wins twice in a year, just as we cannot control if two major events in the same country happen back to back. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 12:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::: I was working on getting this started but got an edit conflict. Will leave it for now but my impression is that there's lots of work to be done around this. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 12:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:And to add, the issue on last's years was the lack of any prose supporting the article at the time of nomination. That's not the case here outside things that may become clear in 24hr+ after the event. This one ''still'' needs ceremony details like presenters, it is definitely not yet ready, but its far better than last year. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 12:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''': the article is still a stub, and the blurb is not clear for non-initiated readers. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 13:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::Only to add that the details I was mentioned above have since been added, so this appears to be reasonably prose complete. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 00:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Using the Little Ice Age article as a reference, there's multiple volcanic events that contributed to the changing climate from 1600-1900, and while discovering one of the sources is of scientific interest, this is not as key a breakthrough as the blurb seems to want to suggest. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' Looks good to me, and I'm glad to see some prose in these awards articles for once. Whatever tense problems were in the article have been corrected. Agree with Masem that the fact that something won an award in two consecutive years doesn't seem relevant to whether an award show should be blurbed or not. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 17:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*''' |
*'''Oppose''' due to target article length/overall quality and a far too vague blurb for the average reader. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 13:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''. This is a proposed (unconfirmed) interpretation of an event that happened in 1831. It's a mildly interesting result but has no major impact. I don't think this reaches the level of significance or broad interest that would merit an ITN blurb. In addition, the article is a stub with a single reference. We don't seem to have any article about the 1831 atmospheric phenomena, just a single bullet point in [[Little_Ice_Age_volcanism#1809–1831]] - an indication that the event wasn't particularly influential or historically significant. [[User:Modest Genius|<b style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: maroon;">Modest Genius</b>]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' It looks like the article’s good enough to post. [[User:Blaylockjam10|Blaylockjam10]] ([[User talk:Blaylockjam10|talk]]) 02:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{abottom}} |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Tariana Turia ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article |
| article = Tariana Turia |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| article2 = September 2022 Armenian-Azerbaijani clashes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/538083/obit-dame-tariana-turia-has-died RNZ], [https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/te-pati-maori-co-founder-dame-tariana-turia-dies/XXDWZXIRAJE5ZEBGONKUQBHLKY/ The NZ Herald] |
|||
| blurb = {{strike|Large-scale [[Nagorno-Karabakh conflict|conflict]] breaks out between [[2021–2022 Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis|between Armenia and Azerbaijan]]}} |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| altblurb = '''[[September 2022 Armenian-Azerbaijani clashes|Large-scale clashes]]''' erupt after an '''[[2021–2022 Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis|uneasy ceasefire and tensions]]''' regarding an [[Nagorno-Karabakh conflict|ongoing conflict]] between [[Armenia]] and [[Azerbaijan]]. |
|||
| nominator = MtPenguinMonster <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = '''[[September 2022 Armenia–Azerbaijan clashes|Large-scale clashes]]''' along the [[Armenia]] and [[Azerbaijan]] border kill 99 people. |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| altblurb3 = '''[[September 2022 Armenia–Azerbaijan clashes|At least 99 soldiers die from renewed fighting]]''' in the [[2021–2022 Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis|border crisis]] between [[Armenia]] and [[Azerbaijan]]. |
|||
| nom cmt = Co-founder of [[Te Pāti Māori]] |
|||
| nom cmt = Probably too early to tell if this is full on war or should we be ready to create [[2022 Nagorno-Karabakh war]] article but certainly a huge escalation. Updated at [[2021–2022 Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis#September 2022]] with multiple references there for now. |
|||
| sign = [[User:MtPenguinMonster|MtPenguinMonster]] ([[User talk:MtPenguinMonster|talk]]) 23:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sources = [https://gulfnews.com/world/europe/armenia-azerbaijan-report-deadly-border-clashes-1.1663024737190 Gulf News], [https://www.reuters.com/world/fresh-clashes-erupt-between-azerbaijan-armenia-2022-09-12/ Reuters], [https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/359716 Israel National News], [https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/azerbaijan-armenia-border-clashes-resume-after-provocation Daily Sabah], [https://www.malaymail.com/news/world/2022/09/13/armenia-azerbaijan-report-deadly-border-clashes/27931 Malay Mail] [https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-717014 Jerusalem Post], [https://www.dw.com/en/armenia-azerbaijan-clashes-dozens-killed-along-border-near-nagorno-karabakh/a-63098944 DW] |
|||
| ITNR = no |
|||
| nominator = Abcmaxx |
|||
| updaters = Abcmaxx |
|||
| sign = [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 00:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
* '''Support:''' Reference 32 is a dead raw link, but other than that I don't see any problems (and it's a minor detail that shouldn't stop the article) [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 13:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' looks good to me. A giant in NZ politics for sure. [[User:Ornithoptera|Ornithoptera]] ([[User talk:Ornithoptera|talk]]) 17:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Satis. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 18:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== January 2 == |
|||
:Infobox says that this has been going on for a year and four months. What about the recent "escalation" merits posting? That proposed blurb is uninformative. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 01:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2025 January 2]]}} |
|||
:: The scale, not just skirmishes this is full on shelling and combat. It's breaking news so I didn't know whether to start a new article or just add it to an existing one. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 08:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2025 January 2}} |
|||
*<s>'''Comment''' From what I've read, in the recent skirmish only Armenian side disclosed its casualties (reportedly 49). Hard to assess without Azerbaijani casualties. Ceasefire has been reached by now anyway. [[User:Brandmeister|Brandmeister]]<sup>[[User talk:Brandmeister|talk]]</sup> 10:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)</s> |
|||
**'''Support altblurbs II or III''' Azerbaijani casualties are out, article appears to be ok now. [[User:Brandmeister|Brandmeister]]<sup>[[User talk:Brandmeister|talk]]</sup> 06:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*If an article or extensive section specifically about this escalation is written, then it definitely has a good chance of being featured here. ~[[User:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 10:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' looking at the current statements, Azerbaijan is painting it as “local countermeasures” while Armenia is giving “incursions into its territory”. At a glance, looks like border clashes to me, but I’ll hold my vote to see how the situation develops. Does not seem to be an all-out war in the making though. [[User:Juxlos|Juxlos]] ([[User talk:Juxlos|talk]]) 10:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wait''' – Murky, developing. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 11:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Bulletin''' [[2022 Armenian-Azerbaijani clashes|Is article now.]] [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 11:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*Nice work! Article still needs a lot of work of course ~[[User:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 12:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' until we see whether this stays as clashes or turns into another war. [[User:The Kip|The Kip]] ([[User talk:The Kip|talk]]) 13:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Amended nomination''' to reflect new article.[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 14:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' as written there isn't nearly enough detail for "large scale clashes" --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 14:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' – [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_2022_Armenian-Azerbaijani_clashes New article] is a 120-word stub. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 16:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' It is uncertain whether this escalation will bring about full-scale war, and the clashes have been occurring for some time now. Let's circle back to this later if war does break back out. [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 16:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support on principal, oppose on quality''' yesterday's clashes represent a significant escalation over what has taken place in the past year or two, and have forced an international response, which is beginning to trickle its way into international headlines. I find that significant enough. However, the article does not currently pass on quality. [[User:NorthernFalcon|NorthernFalcon]] ([[User talk:NorthernFalcon|talk]]) 20:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* Time to reevaluate. The article is longer now and the casualties are substantial. Alt3? --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 06:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
**I'm fine with Alt3. Target linking could be narrowed to "renewed fighting". [[User:Brandmeister|Brandmeister]]<sup>[[User talk:Brandmeister|talk]]</sup> 07:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Comment''' – Wednesday coverage agrees on toll of 99. [https://apnews.com/article/azerbaijan-armenia-1aa2ec4e28135a8667823476c391e3ea AP], [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62888891 BBC], [https://www.dw.com/en/armenia-azerbaijan-clashes-almost-100-killed-along-border-near-nagorno-karabakh/a-63098944 DW] But [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_2022_Armenia%E2%80%93Azerbaijan_clashes article] doesn't mention this, and despite its 900 words seems rather sparse, with over one-third devoted to 'reactions.' – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 12:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' - Great development in article. Ready for ITN. [[User:Prodrummer619|Prodrummer619]] ([[User talk:Prodrummer619|talk]]) 16:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== September 12 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2022 September 12]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2022 September 12}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
====RD: |
==== (Posted) RD: Wilhelm Brückner (luthier) ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article |
| article = Wilhelm Brückner (luthier) |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/thueringen/mitte-thueringen/erfurt/geigenbauer-wilhelm-brueckner-tot-100.html MDR] |
|||
| sources = [https://apnews.com/article/texas-san-antonio-obituaries-126ee47f8c61e032933739e141c85044 Associated Press]; [https://www.expressnews.com/business/local/article/Lowry-Mays-San-Antonio-businessman-17438034.php ''San Antonio Express-News'']; [https://today.tamu.edu/2022/09/12/lowry-mays-texas-am-graduate-and-business-school-namesake-dies-at-87/ Texas A&M University] |
|||
| updated |
| updated = yes |
||
| creator = Rundstef |
|||
| nominator = Bloom6132 |
|||
| nominator = Grimes2 |
|||
| updaters = Bloom6132 |
|||
| updaters = Grimes2, Gerda Arendt |
|||
| nom cmt = |
|||
| nom cmt = German luthier in Erfurt. He worked until 90 in his workshop. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 07:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| sign = [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 18:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''', I came to nominate, and perhaps update, but you did it all! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 10:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* Article looks fine, nice work. Not sure if bibliography like this is needed, but that's not an issue here. Posting. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - Well sourced, informative, ready to post. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 13:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Rosita Missoni ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article |
| article = Rosita Missoni |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources |
| sources = [https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2025/jan/02/rosita-missoni-italian-fashion-designer-dies-aged-93 The Guardian], [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/02/fashion/rosita-missoni-dead.html NY Times] |
||
| updated |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator |
| nominator = Thriley |
||
| updaters = |
| updaters = |
||
| nom cmt = Italian knitwear designer. With her husband [[Ottavio Missoni]], she co-founded Italian luxury fashion house [[Missoni]]. Death reported 2 January. |
|||
| nom cmt = Prolific musician. Article isn't in bad shape, but needs plenty references. |
|||
| sign |
| sign = [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 19:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Oppose on quality''' Way too short to be posted to the Main Page. [[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]] <sup>[[User talk:Armbrust|<span style="color: #E3A857;">The</span> <span style="color: #008000;">Homunculus</span>]]</sup> 22:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' I was just coming here to add this myself. Big name with a remarkable career. Article isn't perfect but has enough cites now to be passable. [[User:Vladimir.copic|Vladimir.copic]] ([[User talk:Vladimir.copic|talk]]) 01:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*''' |
*'''Oppose:''' Article is still a stub. It also merely says that she died, but not the causes of death or any reactions to it. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 13:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*:Unless something has changed here recently, cause of death does not need to be mentioned for people who die of old age. RD does not require that degree of depth. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 18:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', tentative on a few more citations. I've just added a few citations to the article where they were needed. Article is almost there apart from the discography. [[User:Doc Strange| Doc Strange]]<sup>[[User talk:Doc Strange|Mailbox]]</sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Doc Strange|Logbook]]</small> 17:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*:She was 93. [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 09:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' Article looks good enough. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 22:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Posted'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 13:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: |
==== RD: Ján Zachara ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article |
| article = Ján Zachara |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = {{cite web |title=Vo veku 96 rokov zomrel bývalý slovenský boxer a olympijský víťaz Ján Zachara |url=https://dennikn.sk/minuta/4386742/?ref=mwat |website=Denník N |language=sk-SK |date=2 January 2025}} {{Cite web |title=Legendary boxer Ján Zachara passed away |url=https://enrsi.rtvs.sk/articles/news/388238/legendary-boxer-jan-zachara-passed-away |access-date=2025-01-02 |website=rtvs.sk |language=en}} |
|||
| sources = [https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2022-09-12/rapper-pnb-rock-shot-at-l-a-restaurant LA Times] |
|||
| updated |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator |
| nominator = Di (they-them) |
||
| nom cmt = 1952 Olympic gold medalist, died on the same day as another 1952 gold medalist ([[Ágnes Keleti]]) |
|||
| updaters = PCN02WPS |
|||
| sign = [[User:Di (they-them)|Di (they-them)]] ([[User talk:Di (they-them)|talk]]) 16:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = American rapper. Career section missing some references. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 00:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Comment''' Current page size is 1427 B (243 words), generally still barely considered a [[WP:STUB]].—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 18:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' I have added sourcing to the career section, I believe everything is sourced. [[User:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">'''PCN02WPS'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">contribs</span>]])</small> 03:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*''' |
*'''Oppose:''' Article is very short, and does not mention the causes of death. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 14:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*' |
*We don't post stubs. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 20:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
==== RD: |
==== RD: Ágnes Keleti ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Ágnes Keleti |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = <ref>{{cite news |title=Meghalt Keleti Ágnes |url=https://www.blikk.hu/sport/meghalt-keleti-agnes/08q17gr |work=Blikk |date=2 January 2025 |language=hu}}</ref> [https://www.blikk.hu/sport/meghalt-keleti-agnes/08q17gr blikk] [https://www.portfolio.hu/gazdasag/20250102/meghalt-keleti-agnes-olimpiai-bajnok-tornasz-732283 portfolio] [https://hvg.hu/sport/20250102_Keleti-Agnes-meghalt-tornasz-olimpiai-bajnok-melbourne-helsinki-holokauszt-tulelo-sportolo-nemzet-sportoloja-ebx hvg] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/12/arts/william-klein-dead.html NYT] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = 94.44.118.57 |
||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = |
| nom cmt = The oldest living Olympian in history <!-- Additional comments go here --> |
||
| sign = <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/94.44.118.57|94.44.118.57]] ([[User talk:94.44.118.57#top|talk]]) 07:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 18:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
:Second and and third citation above from {{user|Spworld2}}'s duplicate [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates&diff=prev&oldid=1266807209 nomination]. His comment was |
|||
*'''Wait''': [[Talk:William Klein (photographer)#Move article name|page move discussion]] in progress. In addition {{strike|'''oppose on quality''':}} lots of unreferenced prose, and a large part of the article consists of untidy looking bullet points regarding his work, as well as cannot see any references in those sections either. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 22:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
:{{tq|Ágnes Keleti has died, at the age of 104 , Hungarian Olympic champion, gymnast and Sportswoman}}. [[User:Richard-of-Earth|Richard-of-Earth]] ([[User talk:Richard-of-Earth|talk]]) 09:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
'''Comment''' Actually, she wasn't the oldest at the time of her death. Both [[Yvonne Chabot-Curtet]] and [[Iris Cummings]] were older then Ágnes Keleti. She was the oldest living champion, however. But its almost there, the article. [[User:TheCorriynial|TheCorriynial]] ([[User talk:TheCorriynial|talk]]) 10:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', she's a notable Hungarian athlete who not only won 10 Olympic medals, but was also inducted into the International Jewish Sports Hall of Fame, the Hungarian Sports Hall of Fame, the International Women's Sports Hall of Fame, and the International Gymnastics Hall of Fame. [[User:Di (they-them)|Di (they-them)]] ([[User talk:Di (they-them)|talk]]) 16:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:* This is a recent deaths nomination, and so as per the notice, only the article quality should be considered (every person with an article is eligible to be nominated). [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 17:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Procedural oppose''' as per [[WP:DENY]]. The nominator is blocked for sockpuppetry/block evasion, so we shouldn't be supporting that by allowing this nomination of theirs. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 17:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:If they verifiably died, they qualify. It doesn't help readers in this case to DENY. Per the [[WP:EVASION]] policy: {{tq|This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert.|q=yes}}—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 18:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Article is in quality to post. [[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]] <sup>[[User talk:Armbrust|<span style="color: #E3A857;">The</span> <span style="color: #008000;">Homunculus</span>]]</sup> 22:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' denying a non-offending article's RD eligibility just because it so happened to be initially nominated by a sockpuppet account is a bad precedent to set. It sends a message that if you really dislike someone and don't want them to be memorialized, the solution is for you to quickly create a sockpuppet account and push out an RD nom, so that the target article is never allowed on the main page. The article is well sourced and ready. [[User:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:Teal;">Flip</b>]][[Special:Contribs/Flipandflopped|<sup style="color:purple">and</sup>]][[User talk:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:lime">Flopped</b>]] [[Wikipedia:Civility|<b style="color:grey"> ツ</b>]] 20:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====( |
==== (Closed) Yoav Gallant resigns from Israel parliament ==== |
||
{{atop |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| result = This won't gain consensus. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 19:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| article = Gwyneth Powell |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-62879845 BBC News] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = Cowmilla <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = Cowmilla , Sunshineisles2 <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = English actress |
|||
| sign = [[User:Cowmilla|Cowmilla]] ([[User talk:Cowmilla|talk]]) 13:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''' no reason to oppose, the only thing I can think of is that there's no reference for the school she went to. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 18:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD'''. Ref added. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 13:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====2022 Swedish general election==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Yoav Gallant |
||
| image = Yoav_Galant_1.jpg |
|||
| blurb = {{strike|The '''[[2022 Swedish general election]]''' results in no overall majority}} |
|||
| blurb = '''[[Yoav Gallant]]''', member of the [[Knesset|Israel Parliament]] (pictured), resigns at the age of 66, after being fired in November. |
|||
| altblurb = The [[Swedish Social Democratic Party|Social Democrats]] gain the most votes in the '''[[2022 Swedish general election]]''' but their left-wing bloc lose majority to a right-wing [[Sweden Democrats]]-[[Moderate Party|Moderate]]-[[Christian Democrats (Sweden)|Christian Democrats]]-[[Liberals (Sweden)|Liberals]] bloc. |
|||
| recent deaths = no |
|||
| altblurb2 = The [[Swedish Social Democratic Party|Social Democrats]] gain the most votes in the '''[[2022 Swedish general election]]''' but no party or coalition gains an overall majority. |
|||
| ongoing = no |
|||
| altblurb3 = The right-wing opposition wins a majority of seats in the '''[[2022 Swedish general election]]'''. |
|||
| ITNR = |
| ITNR = no |
||
| sources = [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/11/swedish-election-exit-polls-far-right The Guardian] |
|||
| nominator = Abcmaxx |
|||
| updater = Vacant0 |
|||
| sign = [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 23:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = 94% votes counted, it's pretty much all even, question is whether the other right wing parties will continue to/form a new electoral pact with the very controversial Swedish Democrats party. |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Comment'''. The source cited in the nom ([https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/11/swedish-election-exit-polls-far-right The Guardian]) says something different: The current headline of that Guardian article is "Rightwing bloc heading to victory in Swedish election, 90% of vote count suggests". In the text of the article itself it says: "With 90% of the vote counted, the right bloc of four parties had a share of the vote corresponding to a majority of three in the 349-seat parliament." Similarly, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sweden-holds-election-expected-to-boost-anti-immigrant-party/2022/09/11/da902c32-31a2-11ed-bcc6-0874b26ae296_story.html WaPo] says that the right bloc appears to have won a narrow majority of seats. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 00:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::: Yes but that bloc is yet to form an official alliance. Technically Social Democrats won with the most votes but nowhere near enough to form government. Even when 100% is counted it will be by the narrowest of margins and if Swedish Democrats turn out to provide the PM as the biggest right-bloc party I can guarantee you there'll be a huge uproar.[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 00:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::That's an explicitly [[WP:OR]] argument. If and when we do post something to the ITN, the blurb should correspond to what [[WP:RS]] say. And right now most sources say that the the right bloc appears to have won the majority of seats. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 00:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Wait.''' The blurb is very much unhelpful. Most media reports group M, SD, KD and L together, and by the current count they do indeed have a majority. Such a blurb would be much better. Second, the count is still ongoing. It's not confirmed who will win before the remaining votes are counted. As such, posting a blurb at this moment is absolutely premature. [[User:Gust Justice|Gust Justice]] ([[User talk:Gust Justice|talk]]) 00:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::: The Social Democrats will win a pyrrhic victory. Those 6% left will not change that. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 00:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::It's not a win at all for the Social Democrats. Sure they are the largest party, but that doesn't mean anything in the Swedish parliamentary system, where a majority in parliament must elect the Prime Minister. I don't think the outcome will change once the last votes are counted, but we need [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] to say so, not conclude it ourselves. [[User:Gust Justice|Gust Justice]] ([[User talk:Gust Justice|talk]]) 00:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::The last votes remaining to be counted are the postal votes not the in-person votes. They may sway a different way albeit only slightly. [[User:Haris920|Haris920]] ([[User talk:Haris920|talk]]) 04:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Oppose.''' If we are going by that blurb, it clearly is against the [[WP:RS]] which therefore should not be posted. If the blurb reflects [[WP:RS]], i’m for it but this nomination is too early and is all in all wrong.[https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/swedes-head-polls-close-run-election-marked-by-crime-energy-crisis-2022-09-10/] [[User:BastianMAT|BastianMAT]] ([[User talk:BastianMAT|talk]]) 00:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Wait.''' I agree with Abcmaxx on this - the blurb can't be posted as is. If nothing else it may be worth waiting until we hear about coalitions or such, and if this does not come to pass we could at least say that the Social Democrats won the most seats (which may not tell the whole story but tells a bit more). [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 00:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:* '''Wait''' This election is very close although the right-wing bloc currently has a slight majority of 175 seats. Vote counting is still ongoing and will continue until Wednesday. Social Democrats have been the largest party for the past 100 years and it should be noted that Sweden Democrats are now the second-largest party. I'd recommend to change the blurb. |
|||
:[[User:Vacant0|Vacant0]] ([[User talk:Vacant0|talk]]) 09:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Guardian now reports a one seat majority at 95% count. I agree with waiting. Regards [[User:SoWhy|<span style="color:#7A2F2F;font-variant:small-caps">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="color:#474F84;font-variant:small-caps">Why</span>]] 12:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Update''' Social Democrats likely will win in terms of individual party performance, but right bloc may win by a small margin against the left-bloc.[https://apnews.com/article/nato-elections-immigration-migration-f89a25900940a31fd6dda25802e980b9 AP News] [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 11:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Added altblurb''' and '''withdrawn blurb''' per above comments. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 11:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wait''' ... for official, final results. For obvious reasons. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 11:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wait'''. The final results will not be in for a few days yet. It is '''likely''' that the liberal-conservative-far right bloc will win a majority, and the left-green-liberal bloc will lose power. It is, however, '''not''' clear yet. Furthermore, while it is '''likely''' that the Moderates and the Christian Democrats, or the Moderates, the Christian Democrats and the Liberals, can form government if these parties together with the Sweden Democrats can form government, they have yet to actually agree, complicated by the fact that the Sweden Democrats are the biggest party among the four but the Liberals have stated they will not to agree to any government the Sweden Democrats are part of. In short, it's far too early to make any statements around where this will lead – we don't present the probable as fact. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 12:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment on quality''' Whilst the consensus is to wait for the final results and what the coalitions will look like in terms of forming a majority government, I believe that so far the quality of the article of is very good; in terms of length, quality and referencing alike. If anyone disagrees please comment and/or improve the article. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* It might be really nice if we had a stand-alone article on the conservative bloc/coalition. (But the current election article is easily looking good enough for blurbing of course!) ~[[User:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 13:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: We don't know whether they will form an official one yet and what the composition will be to be fair. So far it has been an informal alliance on a local level. Having said that we may need an article on the left bloc coalition equally as well. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, it's likely we won't get all the parties involved together in a coalition government – it's a very uneasy alliance, with the Liberals agreeing to talk to the Sweden Democrats to negotiate a government but stating they will not support a government including the Sweden Democrats; likewise, in the opposite bloc, the Centre Party can't imagine forming government with the Left Party. We're looking at minority governments with reluctant support from parties who don't exactly like each other but consider the alternatives worse. I'm not sure we should create articles for these uneasy alliances unless there is very good sourcing to do so specifically. They are in no way as strong as for example [[Alliance (Sweden)]], which was a real coalition, used to be. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 13:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::: It's exactly why I had the initial blurb as it was; no-one won really. Also, worth adding that the [[Red-Greens (Sweden)|Red-Greens]] have an article regarding the left bloc which may need updating and inclusion in the election article. It may even needs to be split as it technically refers to 2x coalitions. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::: '''Added altblurb2''' in case there is a minority government.[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|Julle}} am I right in saying that there's a chance of a [[hung parliament]] and another election or are we likely to see another minority government? [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] I think a hung parliament would be far too speculative for us. All sources assume someone will form government based on the result we'll see on Wednesday or Thursday. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 14:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wait''', for final results. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 15:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wait''' per the article, the results are not official because the election is close enough that mail in ballots could change the outcome of the election. Would support a fresh nomination once enough results have come in that we know the outcome. [[User:NorthernFalcon|NorthernFalcon]] ([[User talk:NorthernFalcon|talk]]) 00:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wait''' As to Le Monde and several other news outlets votes will be [https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2022/09/12/sweden-s-right-wing-poised-for-election-victory-on-far-right-gains_5996598_4.html counted '''until Wednesday'''] due to the narrow outcome.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 05:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:It is Wednesday day and we still don't have a government to blurb on. The Socialists won, but the rightwing coalition appears to have won. I'd wait until the new Government assumes or on a new Government is agreed upon. [[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 15:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Comment''' I've added a third alternate blurb that more accurate reflects the reporting in [[WP:RS|Reliable Sources]]. As others have pointed out, I think a blurb in any case should only be posted once final results are available on Wednesday. [[User:Gust Justice|Gust Justice]] ([[User talk:Gust Justice|talk]]) 09:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Comment''' As of 99.63% of votes counted, the Social Democrats will remain the largest parliamentary party, although the SD–M–KD–L bloc won the election by two seats. It's time to post this now. --[[User:Vacant0|Vacant0]] ([[User talk:Vacant0|talk]]) 16:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====South African dam collapse==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = 2022 Jagersfontein dam collapse |
|||
<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = '''[[2022 Jagersfontein dam collapse|A dam collapse]]''' in [[Jagersfontein]], [[Free State (province)|Free State]], [[South Africa]] leaves thousands displaced and hundreds injured. |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| ongoing = yes <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
||
| altblurb2 = |
| altblurb2 = |
||
| sources = [https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/israels-sacked-defence-minister-yoav-gallant-quits-politics-just-as-battlefield-7381165 NDTV] [https://www.timesofisrael.com/daily-briefing-jan-2-day-454-gallant-leaves-the-knesset-but-will-he-return/ The Times Of Israel] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-11/dam-collapse-at-abandoned-south-african-diamond-mine-kills-three Bloomberg], [https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/live-one-dead-in-jagersfontein-mine-dam-burst-disaster-in-free-state-20220912 News24], [https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-09-12-in-photos-the-destruction-of-the-jagersfontein-mine-dam-wall-collapse/ Daily Maverick], [https://www.sowetanlive.co.za/amp/news/2022-09-12-jagersfontein-mine-puts-up-r20m-disaster-fund/ Sowetan], [https://ewn.co.za/2022/09/12/owners-of-jagersfontein-mine-dam-were-warned-to-stabilise-wall-fs-govt/amp Eyewitness News], [https://www.enca.com/news/free-state-dam-electricity-supply-cut-jagersfontein eNCA (eNews Channel Africa)], [https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/r20-million-set-aside-to-assist-affected-residents-jagersfontein-developments/ SABC News], [https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/south-africa-mine-dam-wall-collapses-killing-three-injuring-40-2022-09-11/ Reuters] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| |
| nominator = ArPerfectlyEdits <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| |
| nom cmt = I'm surprised nobody has mentioned this yet. |
||
| sign = [[User:ArPerfectlyEdits|ArPerfectlyEdits]] ([[User talk:ArPerfectlyEdits|talk]]) 14:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| creator = TapticInfo <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = TapticInfo <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:TapticInfo|TapticInfo]] ([[User talk:TapticInfo|talk]]) 18:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*''' |
*'''Oppose''' Thanks for the information, but resigning from parliament is not ITN-worthy. He was already ITN with the fact, that the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 14:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
* |
*'''Oppose'''. Resigning after being fired is hardly the news bombshell he might have hoped for, even if he is an international criminal. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 15:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong oppose''' first this doesn't meet [[WP:ITNSIGNIF]]. Also, this nomination was made by an editor with 29 edits, and so violates [[WP:ARBPIA]] (need to have 500 edits to edit this topic area). [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 17:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wait''' – Largely absent from main English RS sites as of 19:30 Monday. [https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/south-africa-mine-dam-wall-collapses-killing-three-injuring-40-2022-09-11/ Reuters] report says one killed, 40 injured. Presumably developing. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
*:I don't understand your last sentence. Why should an ITNC editor have 500 edits? [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 17:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*::That's coming from the Arbcom decision on anythibg related to the Israel/Palestine conflict, which includes when these topics appear on ITN.<span id="Masem:1735843709420:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 18:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Wait''' on article quality; this is basically a stub and most of the article is background taken from [[Jagersfontein]]. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 05:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
* '''Comment''' – On Tuesday absent from primary Eng. RS sites. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 11:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== January 1 == |
||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/ |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2025 January 1]]}} |
||
{{Portal:Current events/ |
{{Portal:Current events/2025 January 1}} |
||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== |
==== RD: David Lodge ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = David Lodge (author)<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www.euronews.com/culture/2025/01/03/david-lodge-campus-trilogy-author-and-academic-dies-at-89 Euronews]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2022/09/11/mavis-nicholson-welsh-broadcaster-whose-skill-warmth-interviewer/ ''The Daily Telegraph'']; [https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/sep/11/mavis-nicholson-obituary ''The Guardian'']; [https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mavis-nicholson-obituary-gql88xw96 ''The Times''] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = 240F:7A:6253:1:3531:2BB0:7F04:241F <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| updaters = Jkaharper <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| updaters = Bloom6132 |
|||
| nom cmt = |
| nom cmt = British author and critic.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
||
| sign = |
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/240F:7A:6253:1:3531:2BB0:7F04:241F|240F:7A:6253:1:3531:2BB0:7F04:241F]] ([[User talk:240F:7A:6253:1:3531:2BB0:7F04:241F|talk]]) 02:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''' Appropriate depth of coverage, fully referenced. Marking ready. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 13:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 01:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Wayne Osmond==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Wayne Osmond |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wayne-osmond-dies-age-73-donny-osmond-marie-osmond-the-osmonds/ CBS], [https://www.yourerie.com/news/wayne-osmond-dies-at-age-73-family-says-will-miss-him-dearly/ YourErie], [https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Culture/wayne-osmond-osmonds-singer-brother-donny-marie-dies/story?id=117284998 ABC] |
|||
| sources = [https://newn.cam.ac.uk/newnham-news/a-tribute-to-joyce-reynolds-fba-1918-2022/ Newnham College], [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2022/09/12/joyce-reynolds-classicist-who-inspired-mary-beard-specialised/ ''Telegraph''] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = TheAstorPastor <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| |
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Reynolds was a pioneering woman in the world of classical scholarship and a centenarian. |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Modussiccandi|Modussiccandi]] ([[User talk:Modussiccandi|talk]]) 13:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 08:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support'''. Still working before her death too. The quality of her article is of a standard similar to or better than the four most recent deaths listed ([[James L. Fisher]], [[LaDeva Davis]], [[Anthony Varvaro]] and [[James Polshek]]), she has a photograph (two of those don't) and she sounds like a more remarkable person than all four men combined. --[[User:Gaois|Gaois]] ([[User talk:Gaois|talk]]) 21:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:That last part is completely unfounded. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 21:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::It was not intended disrespectfully towards the four. A 103-year-old pioneering academic who was still working towards the end of her life, a [[Kenyon Medal]] winner (it is only awarded every two years), a scholarship is named after her, she is the oldest recipient of a [[Doctor of Letters|D.Litt.]] honorary degree from Cambridge... --[[User:Gaois|Gaois]] ([[User talk:Gaois|talk]]) 02:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Please be reminded that notability is not part of the consideration for RD nominations. Let's focus on article quality and MainPage readiness. Any wikibio with no glaring problems would be fine, as long as the subject is indeed recently deceased. -- [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 02:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:And I imagine Davis would not appreciate being misgendered. Plus, the article has an uncited paragraph that needs to be fixed, unlike those four aforementioned articles. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::Apologies. 😧 Was the uncited paragraph that sentence about the book? I can't see anything else. There is a citation now. --[[User:Gaois|Gaois]] ([[User talk:Gaois|talk]]) 02:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::That was the one. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 03:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Looks ready. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 03:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Interesting to read article.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 05:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Posted'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 06:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== ( |
==== (Closed) 2025 Trump International Hotel explosion ==== |
||
{{atop|result=Consensus to post will not develop. {{NAC}} <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> 08:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article |
| article = Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion |
||
| image = Trump International Hotel Las Vegas.png |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = One person is killed and seven others are injured when a [[Tesla Cybertruck]] '''[[Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion|explodes]]''' (pictured) outside of the [[Trump International Hotel Las Vegas]] in [[Paradise, Nevada|Paradise]], [[Nevada]], United States. |
|||
| blurb = '''[[2022 Papua New Guinea earthquake|A magnitude 7.6 or 7.7 earthquake]]''' strikes [[Papua New Guinea]], leaving at least seven people dead. |
|||
| altblurb = |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/01/us/car-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas.html The New York Times] [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz7qd97eyp0o BBC] [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/police-investigating-vehicle-explosion-trump-hotel-las-vegas/story?id=117252987 ABC News] |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
|nominator = Spworld2 |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 09:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.barrons.com/news/one-dead-in-massive-papua-new-guinea-quake-01662872706 Barrons], [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/papua-new-guinea-earthquake-deaths/ CBS], [https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/10/asia/earthquake-papua-new-guinea/index.html CNN], [https://www.reuters.com/article/papua-quake/powerful-earthquake-strikes-papua-new-guinea-idUSKBN2QC00G Reuters], [https://time.com/6212562/earthquake-papua-new-guinea-leaving-3-dead/ Time] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Indefensible <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = Dora the Axe-plorer |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Greater magnitude than recent Sichuan earthquake which is currently blurbed, fewer casualties. |
|||
| sign = - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 22:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Comment''' [[List of earthquakes in Papua New Guinea]] --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 22:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Not as many as I expected actually; this is only the 16th listed since Wikipedia was created, and 3rd most powerful among them it seems. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 22:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::Yeah so one every 18 months or so, seems an average number of fatalities. Need more details on what "widespread damage" means to really evaluate. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 23:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' Reports are coming in slow so may want to put this nomination on wait first. The region is currently in a total system outage so higher figures could come in days after the earthquake. '''''[[User:Dora the Axe-plorer|Dora the Axe-plorer]]''''' ([[User talk:Dora the Axe-plorer|explore]]) 00:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Commment''' We should link to the [[2002 Papua New Guinea earthquake|actual article]] rather than a list of all earthquakes in papua new guinea <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Haris920|Haris920]] ([[User talk:Haris920#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Haris920|contribs]]) 05:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
*'''Support''' – I think the article is already looking really solid! I think this is a really good subject to feature, though I'm of course looking forward to seeing the article expand more as more information flows in. ~[[User:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 07:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. It's rare to have an earthquake of that magnitude therefore definitely a notable event. The article is long, detailed and sourced, despite it concerning a remote part of the world. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 08:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:They had a 7.6 three years ago, a 7.9 six years ago and five 7.0 or higher in the last four years what exactly is "rare" here? --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 09:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::: Those are still almighty big earthquakes though, each notable in its own right. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) |
|||
* '''Wait''' – A big shake, but so far few casualties reported. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 11:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::: Please let's not go down the rabbit hole of WP:MINIMUMDEATHS. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' Article is in good shape, topic is in the news. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 13:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''', Article has enough information. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 15:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' - is it that unusual though? [https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=-88.05157,-247.5&extent=88.05157,607.5&range=search&listOnlyShown=true&baseLayer=terrain&timeZone=utc&search=%7B%22name%22:%22Search%20Results%22,%22params%22:%7B%22starttime%22:%221900-01-01%2000:00:00%22,%22minmagnitude%22:7,%22orderby%22:%22time%22%7D%7D USGS] lists 19 7+ earthquakes in 2021 and 11 in that area since 2010. 7.6 is on the high end of Magnitude 7 quakes, but the death toll seems minimal. There were 3 magnitude 8+ earthquakes worldwide in 2021. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 00:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' This does not seem like consensus at all. ''<small>[[User_talk:GreatCaesarsGhost|<span style="color:#938f8d">GreatCaesarsGhost</span>]]</small>'' 11:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Post-posting comment''' – Given the relatively low number of casualties, this seems somewhat [[WP:UNDUE|UNDUE]]. Not widely covered Tues. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 11:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:UNDUE is not a policy that applies to posting items on the main page. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 12:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::Lives matter. -- [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 12:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong oppose''' This was deliberated before but it was taken down. Now a few hours on, we have more coverage than [[Smoke and mirrors|smoke being reported by The Mirror]], but it still doesn't appear that important. Also, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion|the article is at AfD]], but that appears to be SNOW keep at the moment. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 05:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====(Posted) RD: Anthony Varvaro ==== |
|||
*:@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] This is in favor of the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion|AfD discussion]], but the article should maintain its current status. |
|||
*:This does not appear to be a normal explosion, there is international media coverage[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz7qd97eyp0o][https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/01/us/car-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas.html][https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/police-investigating-vehicle-explosion-trump-hotel-las-vegas/story?id=117252987][https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/tesla-cybertruck-explodes-outside-trump-las-vegas-hotel-1-killed-7-injured-7380504], one person was killed and 7 were injured, and there are reports that this is related to the [[2025 New Orleans truck attack]] [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 05:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Whether it was intentional or not, a single death is not significant to post as a story, unless it was determined to be an act of terrorism (which doesn't seem to be the case at this point). --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 05:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] Was it determined to be intentional or not? There was one death and more than 7 injuries, and this did not happen near a normal hotel. 2025 New Orleans truck attack still under investigation - |
|||
*:FBI is trying to determine if the incident was an act of terrorism, CNN [https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/01/us/cybertruck-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas/index.html] reports [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 05:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:Are you suggesting MINIMUMDEATHS > 1? [[User:Banedon|Banedon]] ([[User talk:Banedon|talk]]) 08:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::It [[WP:MINIMUMDEATHS|has a link]]. —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 08:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - this nomination has already been closed once. This could easily be just an accident or a grandiose suicide. The only reason there may be more coverage than local is because of the (possibly conincidental) timing with the New Orleans attack; which would make it the same story if there is a link. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 05:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:Nfitz|Nfit]] It seems that the previous nomination was terminated due to lack of quality. This does not seem to be a normal occurrence. [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 05:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:[[#(Closed) 2025 Trump Tower fire|The previous nom]] was withdrawn by the nominator.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 08:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#(Closed)_2025_Trump_Tower_fire as per the previous one being withdrawn in the face of unanimous opposes]. I share the sentiments of one of the original comments. A car fire? Some Tesla cars seem to have this issue. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the King!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 09:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:To be fair, mass shootings (and other kind of mass-murders) are objectively more common in the US than car fires. [[Special:Contributions/51.154.145.205|51.154.145.205]] ([[User talk:51.154.145.205|talk]]) 11:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:: In 2021, 650 Americans died in motor vehicle fires and 48,000 by firearms, but most are suicides; only about 480 were in mass shootings. [[User:Hawkeye7|<span style="color:#800082">Hawkeye7</span>]] [[User_talk:Hawkeye7|<span style="font-size:80%">(discuss)</span>]] 05:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' as a single item, merge with the New Orleans blurb IF a connection is officially confirmed. [[User:Johndavies837|Johndavies837]] ([[User talk:Johndavies837|talk]]) 10:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' we do not report incidents where only one person died unless if it is the assassination of a notable person. |
|||
:[[User:Djprasadian|Djprasadian]] ([[User talk:Djprasadian|talk]]) 11:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes, Vice President Elect Musk has "broken silence" to reassure us that Tesla Cybertrucks are perfectly safe. But he is still alive. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 11:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Vehicles explode (and cause injuries from said explosions) all the time, I don’t see what makes this particular instance so special. I may reconsider if concrete proof of the explosion being intentional comes out, but I doubt it. [[User:Hungry403|Hungry403]] ([[User talk:Hungry403|talk]]) 13:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:I also see that this nom was closed already, another reason for opposition [[User:Hungry403|Hungry403]] ([[User talk:Hungry403|talk]]) 13:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::{{small|Note: I'm pretty sure that Tesla Cybertrucks are not concrete-proof.}} [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 14:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' It seems fairly clear that this wasn't a routine vehicle fire as the explosion was set up with fireworks and gas canisters. It seems conceivable that it's connected with the other truck terrorism incident and so we should await further investigation. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 14:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' @[[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]] is right. Some new articles are now calling this a possible act of terrorism. [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-tower-las-vegas-cybertruck-explosion-fire/], [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tesla-cybertruck-appears-burst-flames-trump-hotel-las-vegas-rcna185932]<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:IDB.S|IDB.S]] ([[User talk:IDB.S#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/IDB.S|contribs]]) 17:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::The [https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/01/02/las-vegas-explosion-tesla-cybertruck-trump-hotel-colorado/ police are saying] this is likely a '''Suicide'''. I'm horrified that people keep recreating the article and reopening the discussion, when this was pretty obviously a good likelihood at the time this discussion was reopened! Close this abortion now. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 19:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong Oppose''' This was already previously nominated, discussed, and quickly closed. --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 19:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' I was rejected from nominating it, however now that it was a terrorist attack and one person died, it only makes sense for it to be nominated. Two terrorist attacks in one day, sad. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SimpleSubCubicGraph|contribs]]) 20:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
*:There's no indication, [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]], that this was a suicide. Why do you think this wasn't a suicide? [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 20:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::@[[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] well I've heard from some news sources that it is a terrorist attack. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 20:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Do you have any references, [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]]? I haven't seen any since they declared that they believe it's a suicide. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 20:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' my alt blurb. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 20:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:Strong oppose (again) that altblurb. These attacks are not related in method or scope (active attack with 10+ deaths vs. a suicide with no additional deaths). Also, while most know where New Orleans is, Paradise in English internationally overwhelmingly is not used to refer to the Nevada location. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 20:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::Sorry, I don't live in the US and I'm not familiar with American cities. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 20:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::Our article [[Trump International Hotel Las Vegas]] says it's in Paradise, not Las Vegas. Our blurbs shouldn't be factually wrong. Though why anyone wants to ITN a suicide I don't know. That's highly concerning. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 21:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Trying to think of it as an '''explosion''' rather than a suicide might alleviate some of that concern. People nominate exploding meteors, exploding pipelines, exploding all kinds of stuff. Humans are often involved, but they're not the basis, like in ''pure'' death cases. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 21:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' The authorities have officially announced that this incident was ''not'' linked to the New Orleans incident. With that in mind, this is not nearly important enough for the main page. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 20:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*I'm just...appalled with this discussion, between the last nom and this one. I do agree with the consensus that this is a single isolated incident and not really ITN worthy, I really think the civility was lost some time ago with this one. Just a recommendation everyone - let's chill out a bit. [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 20:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:It's free forum open to divergent opinions. The only civility lost was due to the tragedies. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 20:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::When divergent opinions go to reopening closed debatess and glorifying suicide, then that's a step too far. The article is a huge violation of [[MOS:SUICIDE]]. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 21:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::The original nomination was withdrawn, not closed otherwise. Reporting by major reliable sources has improved since then so reopening this wasn't quite as big of a problem as that, in my opinion. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 21:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - This is now being reported as an isolated incident. As no-one but the victim/perpetrator died, I don't think it comes anywhere near the usual threshold for ITN, and I'm rather suprised it's still being debated. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 23:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' -- this really ought to be closed; clearly consensus won't develop to post this. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 05:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
====(Posted) Schengen Area expansion ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article |
| article = Schengen Area |
||
| blurb = Romania and Bulgaria join the '''[[Schengen Area]]''', the European passport-free zone. |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| altblurb = [[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] join the '''[[Schengen Area]]''' and lift land border checks. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.ajc.com/sports/atlanta-braves/former-braves-pitcher-dies-in-auto-accident/YUCDAB6C6NFIDJPQ2PI5SVSBSU/ AJC] |
|||
| altblurb2 = [[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] both become full members of the '''[[Schengen Area]]'''. |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| altblurb3 = [[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] both become full members of the '''[[Schengen Area]]''' by removing land border checks, seven months after their initial admission. |
|||
| nominator = Muboshgu <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sources = [https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/01/europe/romania-bulgaria-schengen-zone-intl/index.html CNN], [https://www.reuters.com/world/romania-bulgaria-fully-join-eus-borderless-schengen-zone-2025-01-01/ Reuters] |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nominator = UCinternational |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| updaters = WikiContributor0830 |
|||
| sign = – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 19:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''' Looks fine to me. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 20:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Looks good. --[[User:Vacant0|Vacant0]] ([[User talk:Vacant0|talk]]) 22:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support:''' I see nothing in this article that would make me not want to recommend it for ITN posting; If anyone has any specific observations on problems with the article, please list them out here so that they can be addressed. [[User:KConWiki|KConWiki]] ([[User talk:KConWiki|talk]]) 02:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD'''. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 03:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support''', I would argue that any changes to the composition of the [[Schengen Area]] are inherently relevant as the largest area with free movement in the world, and for years it has been a major topic of discussion here in the European Union that Romania and Bulgaria were the last EU members to not have been admitted (excl. Ireland who have an opt-out) because of a veto from Austria in the Council of the European Union. So it was very significant when the vote finally passed last month in the [[Justice and Home Affairs Council]]. |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Javier Marías ==== |
|||
:However, that wording is probably not ideal—''in a legal sense'', Romania and Bulgaria joined the Schengen Area on 31 March 2024 when border controls were lifted for air and sea travel. The news are that land border checks have also just been lifted, granting the countries full participation on the same level as all other 27 member states. |
|||
:So I would propose re-phrasing the blurb to something like ''[[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] become full members of the [[Schengen Area]], with land border checks lifted on 1 January 2025.'' |
|||
: [[User:BochiBochiGalaxy|BochiBochiGalaxy]] ([[User talk:BochiBochiGalaxy|talk]]) 05:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support''', but agree with BochiBochiGalaxy, so also '''added altblurb 1.''' [[User:Yo.dazo|Yo.dazo]] ([[User talk:Yo.dazo|talk]]) 10:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support on notability''' This is a major change in international policy. --[[User:MtPenguinMonster|MtPenguinMonster]] ([[User talk:MtPenguinMonster|talk]]) 11:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support ALT1''' as a major change in policy that is in the news, so meets [[WP:ITNSIGNIF]]. And target article has enough information about this event to pass [[WP:ITNQUALITY]]. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 11:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' This item is misleading because, currently, many major EU nations are actually operating border controls – Austria, Denmark, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, etc. – see [https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen-borders-and-visa/schengen-area/temporary-reintroduction-border-control_en EU Commission]. Schengen is effectively in abeyance and the article/blurb do not explain this. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 14:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - Positive news, and any complaints about the article or story being misleading can be addressed in the article itself. [[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 16:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - important moment for those countries. Very notable event. - [[User:Eugen Simion 14|Eugen Simion 14]] ([[User talk:Eugen Simion 14|talk]]) 18:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Support''' per Eugen. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 20:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Oppose''' - 2 nations joining the Schengen isn't that exciting. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 20:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Major development. {{ping|SimpleSubCubicGraph}} ITN articles do not have to be "exciting", they simply must be important. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 20:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support altblurb2''' as nominator. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 22:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Both are major European countries with relatively large populations. I like the original blurb the most, but I'm fine with any of them. This is certainly a development worthy for ITN. --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 22:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:With the edits to the blurbs, I now prefer '''Altblurb 1''' to the others. [[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 06:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support alt2''' - Significant development in international relations. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 23:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::NB: Since I made the above post, the blurbs have been edited by another user to be more verbose than they were previously. I liked the conciseness of alt2, which is why I voted for it. The current alt2 is not what I voted for; I would support '''the original blurb''' in preference to it. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 00:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{ping|GenevieveDEon}} I've restored altblurb2 and moved the appended altblurb2 to a new altblurb since it was significantly appended by another editor without my knowledge. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 02:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' ALT2. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 07:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: John B. O'Reilly Jr. ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = John B. O'Reilly Jr. |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www. |
| sources = [https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/former-longtime-dearborn-mayor-john-jack-oreilly-jr-has-died-says-family] |
||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = History6042 |
||
| updaters = Moeqas, Jkaharper, |
|||
| updaters = SitcomyFan, MichelCastagne, Martin Petherbridge, Paradise Chronicle, Gaois, Asqueladd, and more. |
|||
| nom cmt = 6th mayor of Dearborn, Michigan. |
|||
| nom cmt = Spanish novelist. Other updaters include: Jkaharper, Ira Leviton, Goszei, Asqueladd, Normantas Bataitis, Unknown artist, Alexcalamaro, and more. |
|||
| sign = |
| sign = [[User:History6042|<span style="color:darkorange">History6042😊</span>]] '''([[User talk:History6042|<span style="color:blue">Contact me</span>]])''' 22:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
}} |
|||
*'''Support''' Article appears to be in good shape, subject is notable enough. [[User:Rooves 13|Rooves 13]] ([[User talk:Rooves 13|talk]]) 19:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*In its current form, the article isn't ready. Date and place of birth are unreferenced. There is absolutely nothing about his early life, education, or work history. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 19:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' A number of uncited paragraphs and statements. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 20:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Subject is sure notable enough. Seems to have been quite a writer. But I agree with Black Kite that there are several unsourced phrases, to which I believe the sources can be found easily as I have come across a quite a good source on him. [https://books.google.ch/books?id=ZfVgEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA87&lpg=PA87&dq=travesia+al+horizonte+and+segundo+libro&source=bl&ots=SdcBKwqpVU&sig=ACfU3U2u5nEvpVCAtyAAaUES37HbW4_fvw&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwis-LyCyY36AhUxg_0HHeD8CjkQ6AF6BAgdEAM#v=onepage&q=travesia%20al%20horizonte%20and%20segundo%20libro&f=false The literary mind/thought of Javier Marías] is quite promising. I'll try to add some sources and come back with the result.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 21:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Ok, I am taking a break. For anyone interested to source the Kingdom of Redonda part, it's a fun section with Kings, Duchies and a a charming diplomatic spat with the Government of the United Kingdom.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 00:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' I can see no uncited paragraphs now. A member of [[Royal Spanish Academy|Spain's Royal Academy]], a professor of Spanish literature and translation at [[University of Oxford|Oxford]] and in the United States. People might also be interested in [https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-spain-obituaries-92ad3dfce1247ecc0499dbfc23bf4e14 this], calling him "Spain's most prestigious novelist of the past half century", the Spanish Prime Minister calling him "one of the greatest writers of our age", all of his international prizes. --[[User:Gaois|Gaois]] ([[User talk:Gaois|talk]]) 20:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' While I usually find something with what to expand the article, and there are sure still some uncited phrases like the few on his education and on his Translator, I'd AGF them.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 06:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', the article seems ready to me. [[User:Alexcalamaro|Alexcalamaro]] ([[User talk:Alexcalamaro|talk]]) 07:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Posted'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 12:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Chad Morgan ==== |
||
{{atop|Consensus to post is unlikely to develop, and this is already covered with the ongoing item. Closing before the discussion gets fatuous.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 21:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Chad Morgan |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = Ukraine retakes the key logistical hubs of [[Izyum]] and [[Kupyansk]], following a '''[[2022 Ukrainian Kharkiv counteroffensive|surprise counteroffensive]]''' in [[Kharkiv oblast]] |
|||
| sources = https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-01-02/chad-morgan-australian-country-music-singer-dies/104778248 |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.ft.com/content/2a26a9d9-9866-4479-b2c5-aeee791e6e0e Financial Times], [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/11/zelenskiy-ukraine-kharkiv-territorial-gains-surprise-north-east-counteroffensive The Guardian], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/10/ukraine-kharkiv-russia-retreat-izyum/ Washington Post] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = HiLo48 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = A significant event; the fall of the city and the surrounding area is a major strategic victory for Ukraine, and the biggest setback for Russia since they retreated from Kyiv; commenters have described it as a "stunning rout" that has the potential to change the course of the war. |
|||
| nom cmt = Australian comedy country music performer known as "The Sheik of Scrubby Creek". |
|||
| sign = [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 09:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 22:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
* '''Oppose''' we have it in ongoing <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 09:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*: Being in ongoing doesn't prevent us posting significant events, and I think Ukraine routing Russian forces in Kharkiv is one of those. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 09:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::Counteroffensives are expected in war. It is a significant liberation of territory, but still a long way to go and I think it's covered by the ongoing item. <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 09:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' While we do post big stories while the main ongoing event is going on, this is part of the normal flow of wars. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Major development in the war. Article also looks good. [[Izium]] should be spelled as it is on its own page.[[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 13:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:same thing with [[Kupiansk]]. [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 13:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' — War's going to do its war thing. <span style="font-family: monospace;">[[User talk:ElijahPepe|elijahpepe@wikipedia]] (he/him)</span> 13:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak Oppose''' While I can see it's a new development, I don't see it as newsworthy ''yet''. If they can actually hold on to it and "turn the tide", that's something; but if Russia were to push them back next week it would just be another development. I think the main article in ongoing suffices, for now. –[[User:LordPeterII|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: darkgreen">LordPeterII</span>]] ([[User talk:LordPeterII#top|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: darkgreen">talk</span>]]) 13:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' The major collapse of the Russian army we're seeing now is far from what was "expected", it is not a "normal" war thing but rather surprising and a defining, historic even, moment in this conflict that should be highlighted on ITN. [[User:Shanes|Shanes]] ([[User talk:Shanes|talk]]) 14:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:I don't see the major collapse of the Russian army, yet. A major retreat in one region, but the war is not yet won and we don't have a [[WP:CRYSTAL|crystal ball]]. <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 14:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::It's been widely described as a {{tq|sudden collapse of one of the war's principal front lines}}. The war is not yet won, but it is a significant event regardless of who wins. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 14:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::"One of the principle lines". Exactly. It is clearly a significant battle but the war is ongoing. Similar progress was also made by Russia earlier in the War. It is right that it is in ongoing. <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 15:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::{{tq|clearly a significant battle}} - a strong argument in favour of posting. The fact that the war isn't over shouldn't change that. |
|||
*::::Arguments like these, and those by other editors such as [[User:Sca|Sca]], [[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]], and [[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]], appear to be arguments against posting any blurbs about the war. This wouldn't align with ITN guidelines, which state that we should not oppose a story based on an assessment of the appropriateness of the topic, and would be detrimental to our readers, as one of our purposes is to {{tq|help readers find and quickly access content they are likely to be searching for because an item is in the news}}. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 16:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Err no, my argument is strongly against posting and it's why we have it as ongoing, we can't post every significant event in the war. <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 16:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::Reliable sources are describing this as Ukraine's biggest victory, and most significant gains, since Russia retreated from Kyiv. You are right that we can't post every significant event of in the war, but we if we can't post the most significant event of the past five months what can we post? [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 17:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::::Here's a HYPOTHETICAL example of a postable blurb: "Putin resigns in controversy over Ukraine War." (Preceding purely imaginary.) -- [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' we didn't post Russia taking major objectives we ought not post Ukraine doing so while this is still sitting in ongoing. Now if you're ready to crowbar this forever war out of the ongoing section I'm happy to support relevant blurbs. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 14:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*: The reason presented against posting Russia taking major objectives were that they weren't pivotal; they were normal events in the course of the war. A major counteroffensive, advancing at a rate unseen since the start of the war, does not meet that definition and should be considered on its own merits, rather than rejected because we didn't post other things. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 15:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::That's nice, but we [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates/May_2022#%28Closed%29_End_of_Siege_of_Mariupol didn't blurb the fall of Mariupol] and we won't be blurbing this. I don't get hysterical over Ukranian agitprop and don't see anything here but another grim milestone in an 18 year long struggle. Thanks though. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 17:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Ukranian agitprop? |
|||
*:::And we didn't post the end of the siege of Mariupol for two reasons; it was nominated prematurely, three days before the end of the siege, and because it was considered inevitable. Neither of those reasons apply here. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 17:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::::Did you even read the discussion? Consensus was "sufficiently covered by ongoing" --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 19:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' would perhaps meet the requirements of a blurb if it wasn't covered by ongoing [[User:YD407OTZ|YD407OTZ]] ([[User talk:YD407OTZ|talk]]) 15:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' – There's reason for optimism on Ukraine's part: [https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-zelenskyy-kyiv-kharkiv-77988f0d236f26025159709918f78181 AP] [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62867560 BBC] [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-forces-advance-north-after-fall-russian-stronghold-2022-09-11/ Reuters] [https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20220909-ukraine-success-in-ongoing-offensives-threatens-russian-logistics-lines France24] [https://www.dw.com/en/st-petersburg-district-councilors-accuse-putin-of-treason/a-63079503 DW] But taking the long view, this is another chapter in Russia's merciless war on Ukraine. It's not over. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 15:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:''Another angle:'' "Russian nationalists [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-nationalists-rage-after-stunning-setback-ukraine-2022-09-11/ rage]." -- [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 18:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' It's a campaign in an ongoing war which we already have posted as ongoing event.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 16:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' I'd have supported if not for the previous precedent of not posting any development in the war as long as it's in ongoing. [[User:Banedon|Banedon]] ([[User talk:Banedon|talk]]) 16:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*: {{ping|Banedon}} We've posted several developments, including the [[Sinking of the Moskva]] and the [[Bucha massacre]]. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 16:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''', ongoing events, we have to Waite for major developments. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 16:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*: {{ping|Alex-h}} What would you consider a major development? [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 16:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Ongoing exists for a reason. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 18:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Per Gotitbro, we don't need to post every development in this war, unless something massive (i.e. nuclear war, assassination) happens. [[User:Rooves 13|Rooves 13]] ([[User talk:Rooves 13|talk]]) 19:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Comment''' – After 10 hours, it's 11-3 against posting. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*Now it’s 12-3. '''I’m opposing''' per all above. Already on ongoing. [[User:Alsoriano97|_-_Alsor]] ([[User talk:Alsoriano97|talk]]) 19:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Alsor. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 19:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' as it is an ongoing event. OpSec is also important here. [[User:MarioJump83|MarioJump83]] ([[User talk:MarioJump83|talk]]) 20:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
====( |
==== (Ready) 2025 Cetinje shootings ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| |
|article = 2025 Cetinje shootings |
||
|blurb = Thirteen people including the perpetrator are killed and four others are injured in '''[[2025 Cetinje shootings|spree shootings]]''' in [[Cetinje]], Montenegro. |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
|altblurb = Thirteen are killed in '''[[2025 Cetinje shootings|spree shootings]]''' in [[Cetinje]], Montenegro. The shootings are the deadliest in Montenegro since 1944 during Nazi occupation. |
|||
| sources = https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/switzerland-s-first-female-federal-judge-dies-aged-89/47890508 |
|||
|sources = [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/several-dead-shooting-incident-montenegro-local-media-citing-police-2025-01-01/] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| |
|nominator = SimpleSubCubicGraph}} |
||
*'''Support on notability, oppose on quality''' Quite similar in scope as the [[2022 Cetinje shooting]], also taking place in [[Cetinje]]. Removed mention of terrorism in the blurb as it's not in the source beyond the involvement of counter-terrorist government agencies. The second shooting targeted the restaurant owner's family. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 22:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| creator = Paradise Chronicle |
|||
| nom cmt = She became the first women judge of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, the supreme court on Switzerland in 1974. She died on the 10 September. |
|||
| |
:@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] Changed it once more to deadliest shooting in Montenegro since 1944. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
::That's almost certainly not relevant. "Deadliest since X" isn't needed in a blurb. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 22:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] Please clarify if I am wrong but doesn't blurb mean short description? [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::Blurbs are almost always a single sentence and typically don't contain context in the blurb. For instance, we wouldn't have the second sentence read "Shootings in Montenegro are rare due to strict gun laws" either - that can be implied from the source or the article. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 22:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::I turned SSCG's changes into an altblurb. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 22:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' on quality. Article is all of eight sentences. Notability is unclear. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] how is a terrorist attack that has killed as many people as the New Orleans truck attack not notable? [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::The article does not indicate that this is a terrorist incident. If that is established I would likely support on the merits, though article quality does not meet the customary standards for ITN as of this comment. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] its still people dying... [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::I am not questioning the basic notability of the subject for inclusion in the encyclopedia. But we have a higher bar for blurbs at ITN. All of which said, the immediate problem is article quality. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support on notability, oppose on quality'''. This is the worst shooting in the country since World War II, so it definitely warrants inclusion. However, the article is way too short for the main page. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 22:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:Note: I oppose the altblurb, since those facts may not be correct. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 00:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Oppose'''</s> - there's no mention in the article about these being the largest shootings since WWII. Perhaps because 11 died in the same location less than 30 months ago - [[2022 Cetinje shooting]] (which was ITN). Also there were higher death counts for sprees murdering Albanians during the 1990s Yugoslav wars. This nomination is [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) |
|||
*<s>'''Oppose''' per Nfitz. <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> 23:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)</s> Changed to '''Support''' on notability due to increased death count. <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> 18:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support original blurb on notability, wait on quality'''. This is definitely notable with 10 dead, but the article is a very short stub. I also oppose the alternative blurb per Nfitz. --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 00:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:I now fully '''Support the original blurb''' seeing as the article quality has improved and the casualty count has risen. [[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 20:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Oppose'''</s> '''Weak Oppose''' - This doesn't seem terrorism related at all, and is rather a crazy person with a gun angry at the world after perceived slights. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 00:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) (Note: with the updated death count, I only weakly oppose posting-- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 22:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)) |
|||
*:@[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] he killed as many people as the new orleans truck attack, what makes this not in the news? [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 03:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::I supported this for ITN, did you mean to ping Rockstone? [[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 03:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] Yes, I am sorry. @[[User:Rockstone35|Rockstone35]] read above please [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 03:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::@[[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]] we typically don't post things that are notable only for the number of deaths without something more. We wouldn't have posted a mass shooting that killed 10 people in the US, for example. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 03:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::@[[User:Rockstone35|Rockstone35]] so 10 people dying mean nothing to you? What if you were a family member of those people? Wouldnt you want everyone to hear what that person did? You cant be apathetic to these people just because they dont affect you. You need to understand how that not only affected the family and friends of the 10 but the entire city and nation of Montenegro. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 04:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::Opposing this doesn't mean I don't condemn the attacks or mourn the lives lost. Please don't set up a strawman. Of course I feel awful for the victims, as anyone would. But ITN isn't a newsticker. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 16:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::@[[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]], please read [[WP:RGW]]. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 19:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak oppose''' per Ad Orientem and Nfitz. Beyond deaths, special notability seems shaky. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 03:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' on notability, '''oppose''' on quality. '''Wait''' until the article is not a stub to post it. [[User:Bloxzge 025|Bloxzge 025]] ([[User talk:Bloxzge 025|talk]]) 06:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' The deadliest shooting since World War II is notable itsslf. Article looks better now.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 19:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::There is no indication this this is the deadliest shooting since "Workd War II (sic)". And this isn't stated in the article. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 19:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::The government of Montenegro declared three days of mourning, which is a sign that this is a serious incident on national level. Furthermore, there's no reason why lives of Americans should be valued more than lives of Montenegrins as we already have a similar incident in New Orleans posted on the main page. After careful examination, there's indication that the opposition to this nomination on significance comes from editors who regularly support shootings in the US and complain about anti-American bias when they don’t succeed.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 20:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::Please answer the question. I'm not sure what the USA has to do with this. The nomination is seriously flawed - that's the issue I have. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 21:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::{{reply|Nfitz}} You state that something isn’t the case without providing any evidence that proves the contrary. The [[2022 Cetinje shooting]] you’re referring to had 11 deaths, which is clearly less than 13 deaths in this one. Moreover, there were no murders of Albanians in Montenegro during the 1990s. Montenegro was part of Yugoslavia whose authorities committed murders in Kosovo. You’re welcome to provide additional evidence if you don’t agree with it. There are reliable sources reporting this as ‘the greatest massacre’ in the history of Montenegro (see [https://balkans.aljazeera.net/amp/opinions/2025/1/2/masakr-na-cetinju-je-posljednja-opomena this] as an example), so you need to better elaborate your view that it’s not the case. After all, we typically don’t include such lines in the blurbs we post, so this is a relatively minor issue considering how the story is unfolding (there are three days of mourning, and a country-wide gun ban was proposed).--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::::If you are say that there were no murders of Albanians (contrary to our own Encyclopaedia), I have concerns. My point here is that the article nowhere mentions that this is the deadliest shooting since Work War II, itsslf (sic). Surely, [[User:Kiril Simeonovski]], looking at the article makes that clear (at least at the time that posted). The deaths are indeed now higher than the other recent shooting in this town; I don't see the relevance to my comment. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::{{reply|Nfitz}} I think you should learn some geography and history before participating in such discussions with claims that what you don’t like is flawed (note first that Montenegro and Albania are different countries that haven’t been part of the same political entity over the past 100 years).--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 07:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::Sorry, of Albanians. There's no reason to be rude, and for you to violate one of Wikipedia's most basic principles, just because I've correctly pointed out that the article didn't mention that it was the biggest shooting since World War II. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 09:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::I'm not rude, just honest, and I wasn't bothered by your repeated sarcasm ("Workd War II (sic)"). Fair enough. Let's leave some room for others in this discussion.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 09:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::I think the situation in New Orleans is significantly different than the situation in Montenegro. Namely, the one in New Orleans is a terrorist attack, while this is a domestic violence incident that became a spree shooting. Would you support posting a similar shooting that happened in the US? Personally, I would not. Also, please don't cast aspersions, I do not appreciate your insinuations. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 22:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::{{reply|Rockstone35}} Is there a specific Wikipedia policy that terrorist attacks should be assigned higher significance in ITN nominations? Innocent people died in both incidents, so the motives shouldn’t matter.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::::{{reply|Kiril Simeonovski}} there isn't a specific policy that we shouldn't include mass shootings in countries where they're common, and yet that's consistently what happens, so I don't know what your point is. If the motive doesn't matter, then neither should how often it happens or where. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 00:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::My point is that you cannot dismiss a shooting if it’s not a terrorist attack as we don’t have such policy. There are other indicators of notability, such as public response and policies. If there are days of mourning and proposals for country-wide gun ban, then it’s clear that this is a serious incident that affects the whole society.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 07:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::The main reason I opposed posting was because these types of shootings are routinely not posted if they happen in the US, despite the fact that they had the same number of deaths. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 15:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose on Quality'''. Significance seems to be there, but as many of noted, the article is fairly short. [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 21:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - While the article would still benefit from expansion, it's just about sufficient. Despite the fact that Cetinje has had two of them in four years, shootings of this kind are generally very rare in Europe, and this is clearly more than noteworthy. I am not impressed by arguments attempting to differentiate the New Orleans killings from these by applying the politicised label of 'terrorism'; in a murder on this scale, the puported reason for the killings should not generally be a deciding factor in whether to post. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 23:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - As noted above, the article is short and could benefit from more people writing to expand it, but it is more than enough to understand the event. Regardless of whether Cetinje was unlucky enough to have two modern shootings, these shootings are still extraordinarily rare in Europe. I will also note that I do not understand why so many people have tried to argue on the semantics of the word ''terrorism'' when twelve people have died, and that to most of the world this and the New Orleans terrorist attack have equal relevance – I think there is very clear [[U.S.-centrism]] at display in this discussion. [[User:BochiBochiGalaxy|BochiBochiGalaxy]] ([[User talk:BochiBochiGalaxy|talk]]) 05:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:It isn't Americentricism, please don't cast aspersions. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 15:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support on notability; weak support on quality''' per GenevieveDEon and BochiBochiGalaxy. The article could and should be further expanded, but I think it conveys the basics of what happened sufficiently with some recent additions by editors. It is a landmark mass casualty event for a country that has caused a day of national mourning. The ripple effects of the shooting are also spurring a nationwide conversation about banning firearms. The call for gun reform are in turn attracting global news coverage, e.g. from [https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/01/02/montenegro-shooting-new-years-gun-ban/ the Washington Post] to [https://www.thestar.com/news/world/europe/montenegro-to-tackle-gun-control-after-mass-killing-left-12-dead/article_b6817ae6-aa19-590a-9ebe-69d94d68cd22.html the Toronto Star]. Opposing votes have mentioned the attack being motivated by mental health or family issues, but I point out these were also motivations of the Sandy Hook or Aurora shooters in the USA, attacks which had a lasting impact and which we did post without question. A non-terror motive does not negate that it is an impactful event, with casualties, that is leading to global media coverage. [[User:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:Teal;">Flip</b>]][[Special:Contribs/Flipandflopped|<sup style="color:purple">and</sup>]][[User talk:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:lime">Flopped</b>]] [[Wikipedia:Civility|<b style="color:grey"> ツ</b>]] 18:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - I'm changing my vote as the death toll has increased and I'm sold on the arguments of how rare such events are in Europe compared to other areas. Support blurb - I'm concerned the alt-blurb about WW2 is neither mentioned in the article, nor necessarily correct. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 20:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:Do we have a consensus now? [[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 20:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::Even though I opposed posting... I think we do have consensus. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 03:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:Rockstone35|Rockstone35]] What is the consesus? [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 03:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::@[[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] that it ought to be posted. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 04:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Then we need someone to ping an admin. [[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 04:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::@[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] can you please ping an admin [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 05:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::I'm not sure what the rules are regarding that so I'm not gonna risk it. You should mark this nom as (Ready) though [[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 05:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support original blurb''' or a variation thereof. I'm not sure the comparison to World War II makes a lot of sense even were it factually accurate - certainly what larger massacres occurred in 1944 were of another nature than this one. This is bad enough on its own. [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 21:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====(Posted) 2025 New Orleans truck attack ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
|article = 2025 New Orleans truck attack |image=700 block of Canal Street New Orleans.jpg |
|||
|blurb = 11 people are killed and 36 others are injured in '''[[2025 New Orleans truck attack|a vehicle-ramming and shooting attack]]''' in [[New Orleans|New Orleans, Louisiana]] ''(street pictured)''. |
|||
|altblurb = Eleven people are killed and thirty-six others are injured in a '''[[2025 New Orleans truck attack|vehicle-ramming and shooting attack]]''' in [[New Orleans|New Orleans, Louisiana]] ''(intersection pictured)''. |
|||
|sources = [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-orleans-vehicle-crash-bourbon-street-crowd-casualties-shooting/][https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/01/us/new-orleans-vehicle-crash/new-orleans-vehicle-crash][https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crl378x8nnjo] |
|||
|nominator = Personisinsterest |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*{{Strikethrough|'''Wait''' on quality,}} '''support''' on notability. Going through some international news websites, this is the very top story on most of them and one of the top on all of them. {{Strikethrough|I think a bit more information is needed in the article, but it's a matter of time as new information comes in.}} [[User:Heythereimaguy|Heythereimaguy]] ([[User talk:Heythereimaguy|talk]]) 13:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:I, along with other users, have edited the article as more information has surfaced to the point where I believe that the article is of high enough quality. '''Support'''. [[User:Heythereimaguy|Heythereimaguy]] ([[User talk:Heythereimaguy|talk]]) 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' We typically do not post shootings in the US due to their frequency, but I will note that the fact that they found improvised explosives in the truck and the suspect was wearing armored gear suggests this is more than a run of the mill shooting, very likely premeditated. Should at least wait until some more info on the motive (if they can figure it out, the driver was killed) --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 14:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:For what it's worth, this was more a vehicle attack than a shooting. [[User:Heythereimaguy|Heythereimaguy]] ([[User talk:Heythereimaguy|talk]]) 15:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*: The article is called "car attack" (actually now "truck attack"), so it is puzzling why one would ignore that central aspect when assessing the article's notability. [[User:Einsof|Einsof]] ([[User talk:Einsof|talk]]) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' on quality and '''support without image''' for notability, however, the current image of just the street is, in my opinion, irrelevant. We don't need an image for every blurb. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 14:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*Use '''Terrorist attack''' instead of 'Car attack' if confirmed. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 15:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' quality is ok now. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 15:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support:''' This is the worst terrorist attack on American soil in years. '''[[User:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">BOTTO</span>]]'''<sub> ([[User talk:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">T</span>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">C</span>]])</sub> 15:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{Ping|Personisinsterest}} Would you be able to change the link in your nomination to [[2025 New Orleans truck attack]]? The article has been renamed since you nominated it. '''[[User:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">BOTTO</span>]]'''<sub> ([[User talk:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">T</span>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">C</span>]])</sub> 17:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::Got it! [[User:Personisinsterest|Personisinsterest]] ([[User talk:Personisinsterest|talk]]) 18:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Its the new year and a terrorist attack happened. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. Quality is fine given the amount of publicly available information. Notable based on high number of casualties for a vehicle-ramming attack. [[User:Einsof|Einsof]] ([[User talk:Einsof|talk]]) 17:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Similar to the [[2024 Magdeburg car attack]] that was posted at couple weeks earlier. Even more dead though and with an ISIS flag, bombs and guns, this is not run-of-the-mill in any way. Quality is good considering the amount of info available at the moment. --[[User:Torsodog|<b style="color:#000000">T</b><span style="color:#993300">orsodo</span><b style="color:#000000">g</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Torsodog|Talk]]</sup> 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' – '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 18:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) 2025 Trump Tower fire ==== |
|||
* Long enough (500+ words of prose). Formatting looks fine. Footnotes can be found at expected spots, AGF'ing all non-English refs. [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1109838778&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig found absolutely nothing to complain at all]. This wikibio is '''READY for RD'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 04:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{atop|result=Withdrawn by nom. {{NAC}} <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> 21:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
*'''Posted to RD'''. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 13:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
|article = 2025 Trump tower explosion |blurb = A cybertruck catches on fire near the Trump Tower with casulaties still unknown. |sources = https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-trump-tower-explosion-horror-34403879]|nominator = SimpleSubCubicGraph}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''' and topic ban [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]] from ITN. A car fire? And the sole source in the nomination is from a somewhat questionable tabloid list as [[WP:MREL]]. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*: Don't [[WP:BITE]]. <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> |
|||
* '''Strong oppose''' [[WP:NTRUMP]] - no casualties confirmed or reported yet, damage unclear but doesn't appear much, reporting is coming from inside the tower implying most inside are more or less safe but they're saying that ''the fire wasn't even at the tower.'' The "big story" is literal reporting on ''[[Smoke and mirrors|smoke via The Mirror]]''. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wow''' Great to see some serious sources wading in: [https://www.gbnews.com/news/us/donald-trump-hotel-las-vegas-fire-smoke-explosion ''GB News''], [https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-trump-tower-explosion-horror-34403952 ''Daily Star''], and [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14241815/trump-international-hotel-las-vegas-evacuated-black-smoke.html ''Wiki's Favourite'']. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] I assumed it was a terrorist attack given that another one happened in New Orleans just a few hours ago. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== September 10 == |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2022 September 10]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2022 September 10}} |
|||
== December 31 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 31]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 31}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
====(Posted) RD: Jack Ging==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Jack Ging |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://nbcpalmsprings.com/2022/09/10/jack-ging-dies-at-90/ KMIR-TV (NBC)] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = Bloom6132 |
|||
| updaters = Bloom6132 |
|||
| nom cmt = |
|||
| sign = [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 07:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
* More than long enough with 700+ words of prose. Formatting looks fine. Footnotes can be found at expected spots. [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1109986632&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig has found nothing wrong]. This wikibio is '''READY for RD'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 23:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD'''. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 13:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Buddy MacKay ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Buddy MacKay |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https:// |
| sources = [https://apnews.com/article/buddy-mackay-dead-former-florida-governor-obituary-23b9cbdc43b54b6d8d97dd4b2a6799ee AP] |
||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Davey2116 |
||
| updaters = |
| updaters = |
||
| nom cmt = |
| nom cmt = American politician, [[List of governors of Florida|governor of Florida]] for three weeks (1998–99), dies at age 91. |
||
| sign = [[User: |
| sign = [[User:Davey2116|Davey2116]] ([[User talk:Davey2116|talk]]) 04:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''' - article seems to meet requirements. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 18:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Posted'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 20:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Fraser Stoddart ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Fraser Stoddart<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www.utwente.nl/en/news/2024/12/46788/in-memoriam-sir-fraser-stoddart Twente University]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.post-gazette.com/sports/Pitt/2022/09/10/college-football-hall-of-fame-coach-frank-cignetti-sr-dies-at-84/stories/202209100042 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Grimes2<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| |
| creator = V8rik |
||
| |
| updaters = Grimes2<!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = Nobel Prize laureate in chemistry in the fields [[supramolecular chemistry]] and [[nanotechnology]].<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 19:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 13:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''' Referenced, adequate depth of coverage. Marking ready. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 13:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Posted'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 23:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: |
==== RD: Jocelyn Wildenstein ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Jocelyn Wildenstein<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://people.com/jocelyn-wildenstein-dead-catwoman-socialite-plastic-surgery-8767989 People]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| sources = [https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/who-is-b-b-lal-padma-vibhushan-awardee-ayodhya-excavation-8142254/ Indian Express] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = 240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| updaters = Jkaharper |
| updaters = Jkaharper<!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = Swiss socialite best known for her extensive cosmetic surgery.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Indian archaeologist |
|||
| sign = [[ |
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26|240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26]] ([[User talk:240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26|talk]]) 02:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Comment''' Lack of information on early life (schooling; even where he did bachelor's from; or the year for "master's degree in Sanskrit from Allahabad University"). [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 17:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment:''' List of publications needs an ISBN/ref. Not sure if Google Books links count as sufficient? '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 03:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Arnold Rüütel ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Arnold Rüütel |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www. |
| sources = [https://www.err.ee/1609561162/suri-arnold-ruutel] |
||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = 2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| updaters = |
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = |
| nom cmt = 3rd [[President of Estonia]] from 2001–2006. |
||
| sign = |
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD|2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD]] ([[User talk:2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD|talk]]) 04:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* '''Comment''' – Interesting, long career by a person who lived to 104. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 11:55, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Article in good shape. RIP. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 18:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Posted'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 00:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Not Ready''' Multiple CN tags --[[User:MtPenguinMonster|MtPenguinMonster]] ([[User talk:MtPenguinMonster|talk]]) 08:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== September 9 == |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Several instances in the article of sourcing issues which need to be fixed. Cheers, ''atque supra''! [[User:Fakescientist8000|Fake]][[User talk:Fakescientist8000|scientist]][[Special:Contributions/Fakescientist8000|8000]] 14:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2022 September 9]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2022 September 9}} |
|||
==== RD: Angelo Amato ==== |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
---- |
|||
====(Posted) RD: James Polshek==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Angelo Amato |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://silerenonpossum.com/it/requiem-cardinale-angeloamato/] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/10/arts/james-stewart-polshek-dead.html ''The New York Times'']; [https://web.archive.org/web/20220911073025/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dXpT30kPwVwJ:https://www.ennead.com/news/2022/test-2022&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca Ennead Architects] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = History6042 |
||
| |
| creator = LCahill |
||
| |
| updaters = History6042, Grimes2 |
||
| nom cmt = Italian cardinal who died yesterday. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 13:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| sign = [[User:History6042|<span style="color:darkorange">History6042😊</span>]] '''([[User talk:History6042|<span style="color:blue">Contact me</span>]])''' 04:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Almost there''' One CN tag. But it's an entire list of his publications. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Adequate depth of coverage. Referenced. Marking ready. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 03:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Added}} ISBNs [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 04:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' article now seems cited. [[User:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:Teal;">Flip</b>]][[Special:Contribs/Flipandflopped|<sup style="color:purple">and</sup>]][[User talk:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:lime">Flopped</b>]] [[Wikipedia:Civility|<b style="color:grey"> ツ</b>]] 18:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Johnnie Walker ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Johnnie Walker (DJ) |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www. |
| sources = [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c728nxnx03eo BBC] |
||
| updated = |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Ollieisanerd <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| |
| creator = R. fiend |
||
| updaters = Cameron Scott |
|||
| nom cmt = I think it's minimally sufficient but will keep working on it so lmk if you see something glaring I missed. |
|||
| nom cmt = English disc jockey. |
|||
| sign = – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 03:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Ollieisanerd|<span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #007FFF; color: #98FB98;">Ollieisanerd</span>]] ([[User talk:Ollieisanerd|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ollieisanerd|contribs]]) 16:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
* Long enough (400+ words of prose). Don't see anything missing with the coverage. Formatting looks fine. Footnotes can be found at expected spots. [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1109722643&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig has no complaints at all]. This wikibio is '''READY for RD'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 16:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 00:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support''' He seems to be quite popular as a DJ, including winning many awards. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====(Closed) New High Commissioner for Human Rights==== |
|||
::{{tqq|Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see [[Wikipedia talk:In the news/2016 RD proposal|this RFC]] and [[Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 57#Are animals eligible for the Recent Deaths section?|further discussion]]). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets [[WP:ITNRD]].}} [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 12:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Note:''' currently 18 {cn} tags. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 18:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Not Ready''' per Martinevans123. Referencing is not up to scratch. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) 2024 United States Treasury Hack==== |
|||
{{atop |
{{atop |
||
| result = Good faith nom. However, consensus to post will not develop. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 02:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| status = {{nac}} |
|||
| result = Good faith nomination. However, consensus will not evolve to allow a red link on the mainpage. [[User:Ktin|Ktin]] ([[User talk:Ktin|talk]]) 02:08, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{ITN candidate|recent deaths=no|article=2024 United States Department of the Treasury hack|blurb= The Chinese Communist Party hacks into the United States Treasury, stealing valuable data|altblurb=The [[United States Department of the Treasury]] states that it was '''[[2024 United States Department of the Treasury hack|hacked]]''' by a Chinese intelligence agency.|sources=[https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/us-treasurys-workstations-hacked-cyberattack-by-china-afp-reports-2024-12-30/ (Reuters)]|nominator=SimpleSubCubicGraph|nomcmt=A major scandal within the Treasury that involves a foreign adversary.}} |
|||
* '''Oppose''' First, that blurb is extremely misleading on two angles: Chinese hackers are suspected, but there's not yet any connection to the CCP. Second, the data took was "unclassified documents", which means it is unlikely to be "valuable" data from the Treasure department. As such, this is nowhere close to a major scandle, they just had to report it after reporting it to Congress. At this point, its not a significant incident. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Masem|Masem]] To your first point, yes that is true, a "suspicion" but 99% likely CCP hackers. Secondly, unclassified does not mean publicly available data, there are unclassified documents in the military, but that does not mean you can go around looking at it. Also the extent of the hack is still unreported. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 01:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
::Nonetheless I will still leave it up to garner a community census. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 01:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| article = Volker Türk |
|||
::Which is why at this point, how significant this is is unknown, particularly compared to the phone network hacks earlier this previous month. As this happened earlier this month and only being reported on now, we should wait until we see if there's a serious diplomatic issue that develops. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| blurb = The [[United Nations General Assembly]] approves '''[[Volker Türk]]''' to be new [[Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights|High Commissioner for Human Rights]], succeeding [[Michelle Bachelet]]. |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Oh no, my data! Seriously though, per above this isn't a major or important development yet. Much larger cyberattacks have happened since, such as [[National Public Data]] where actual valuable information was confirmed to be leaked, and that wasn't posted because we couldn't muster enough editors to get that up to quality. Tell me, what was stolen exactly? I'll reconsider if this gets more coverage. I'd give '''weak support''' on quality here. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 04:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| sources = [https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/un-approves-austria-s-volker-turk-as-new-human-rights-chief-1.6061387 The Associated Press via CTV News] |
|||
*:@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] you know the Treasury will not leak what was stolen, but it was likely the programs that monitor and communicate with funding. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 05:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| ITNR = no |
|||
*'''Oppose''' the blurb, it is laughably breaking many WPian notions. '''Nothing''' to say on posting another blurb. [[User:ExclusiveEditor|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF7043,#FFCC80);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-left-radius:6px;border-bottom-left-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;">Exclusive</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#263238,#37474F);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-right-radius:6px;border-bottom-right-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:-1px;">Editor</span>]] [[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|<sub style="font-size:11px;color:#757575;font-style:italic;letter-spacing:.5px;">🔔 Ping Me!</sub>]] 08:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contribution/2001:268:C1C0:9255:35CD:89B9:6539:928A|2001:268:C1C0:9255:35CD:89B9:6539:928A]] ([[User talk:2001:268:C1C0:9255:35CD:89B9:6539:928A|talk]]) 01:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Please do not [[WP:BITE]]. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 09:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
*::I didn't mean it in a devious way, but that in the process of forming a blurb, it produced something which is a bit humorous, as well as not fit few Wiki guidelines. I hope {{u|SimpleSubCubicGraph}} didn't get it the wrong way. It is a good faith nom anyway. --{{User:ExclusiveEditor/Signature}} 11:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' Not a major leadership role (like UN Speaker). --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:@ExclusiveEditor I'm sorry, I won't make a new post anymore if thats what you want [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' at least this blurb as the commissioner himself is a redlink. — ''Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung'', ''[[User:Mellohi!|mello]]'''''[[User talk:Mellohi!|hi!]]''' ([[Special:Contributions/Mellohi!|投稿]]) 01:29, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::@[[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] You got me, I meant you to not post anything ever again, stop editing and take a pretty much [[Sannyasa|sanyasa]] from this wiki world of illusions.{{FBDB}} --{{U|ExclusiveEditor}}[[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|(talk)]] 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* This is a non-starter because the subject does not currently have their own article for the blurb, probably a SNOW close. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 01:44, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:ExclusiveEditor|ExclusiveEditor]] I can not tell if that is humor or not, and yes I am being serious. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' beause the nomination fails [[WP:ITNCRIT]] due to the subject not having their own article. [[User:FAdesdae378|FAdesdae378]] ([[User talk:FAdesdae378|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Contribs/FAdesdae378|contribs]]) 01:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' Just the latest in [[Chinese intelligence activity abroad]] ([[Chinese espionage in the United States]], [[Chinese espionage in California]]) and [[Chinese information operations and information warfare]]. [[2024 United States telecommunications hack]] was another one of these along with the [[Chinese interference in the 2024 United States elections]]; this isn't as unique of a story as it would initially seem. If things escalate we can re-consider. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 09:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Masem. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 12:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Insignificant '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 16:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Masem. -- [[User:KTC|KTC]] ([[User talk:KTC|talk]]) 23:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong Oppose''' and [[WP:WHACK!]] [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]] for a horrid nomination. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 23:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per everybody. --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 23:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per further thought. After rethinking about the grand scope of the article, I have changed my opinion on the matter and no longer think it is newsworthy enough to end up on the front page. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 5:04:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
{{abot}} |
||
== |
== December 30 == |
||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/ |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 30]]}} |
||
{{Portal:Current events/ |
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 30}} |
||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== RD: |
==== RD: Loretta Di Franco ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Loretta Di Franco |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https:// |
| sources = [https://oberon481.typepad.com/oberons_grove/2024/12/loretta-di-franco-has-passed-away-.html Oberon's Grove] |
||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Gerda Arendt |
||
| updaters = |
| updaters = Gerda Arendt |
||
| |
| creator = 4meter4 |
||
| nom cmt = Soprano who performed more than 900 times at the Metropolitan Opera, many small roles and some lead roles. The article was mostly there, but the referencing not quite. The earliest obit is from 30 December, - we don't know (yet) when she died. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 12:39, 10 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 20:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==== RD: Jorge Lanata ==== |
|||
* '''Comment'''. The Discography section has no footnotes. Please add more REFs. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 15:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====(Posted) RD: LaDeva Davis ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Jorge Lanata |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www. |
| sources = [https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cr4r7rx62r2o BBC] |
||
| updated = |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Cambalachero <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| updaters = Cambalachero |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Journalist from Argentina. It too me a pair of days to post this, as the article was mostly unreferenced and had to basically use [[WP:TNT]]. I hope that it is ready for RD status. |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = |
| sign = [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 02:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
==== RD: Michael Newberry ==== |
|||
* Long enough (almost 400 words of prose). Formatting looks fine. Footnotes can be found at expected spots. [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1109602649&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig has no concerns]. This wikibio is '''READY for RD'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 15:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD''' Brief but meets minimum standards. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 03:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: Marciano Cantero ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Michael Newberry (footballer) |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2024/1230/1488535-cliftonville-defender-michael-newberry-dies-aged-27/ RTE], [https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/articles/c8ew80ze410o BBC] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.billboard.com/music/latin/los-enanitos-verdes-singer-marciano-cantero-dead-1235136525/ Billboard], [https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-62845348 BBC], [https://www.clarin.com/espectaculos/murio-marciano-cantero-cantante-enanitos-verdes_0_tXpf7jtuXj.html Clarín]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = The C of E <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| updaters = |
| updaters = The C of E |
||
| nom cmt = English-born Northern Irish footballer |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. -->Argentine musician. Needs a lot more refs, will try to work on it but it probably will be until tomorrow. |
|||
| sign = |
| sign = <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the King!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 10:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* |
*'''Support''' Quality looks good to me. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*:Please note that notability of death is not a requirement. (See last line in the pale yellow box above.) Let's focus the discussion on article quality and MainPage readiness. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 13:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::I know. I support the article's posting on ITN when it has its issues corrected. [[User:Bedivere|Bedivere]] ([[User talk:Bedivere|talk]]) 16:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''': "Biography" is completely unreferenced. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 14:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Jamshid bin Abdullah ==== |
||
{{archive top|1=Discussion here is complete. Any other comments can go on [[WP:ERRORS]]. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 18:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Jamshid bin Abdullah of Zanzibar |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| image = File:Queen_Elizabeth_II_in_March_2015.jpg<!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.atheer.om/2024/12/30/084116/ Atheer.om] |
|||
| blurb = '''[[Elizabeth II]]''' ''(pictured)'', [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|Queen of the United Kingdom]] and 14 other Commonwealth realms, dies at the age of 96. |
|||
| recent deaths = |
|||
| ongoing = |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = BBC Radio, BBC TV and https://www.bbc.co.uk/ |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Mr. Lechkar <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = |
| nom cmt = Last [[sultan of Zanzibar]], claimant to the defunct throne since the monarchy was overthrown in 1964. |
||
| sign = [[User: |
| sign = [[User:Mr. Lechkar|Mr. Lechkar]] ([[User talk:Mr. Lechkar|talk]]) 10:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
:'''Support''' Article looks good, though it's also pretty short. [[User:Yo.dazo|Yo.dazo]] ([[User talk:Yo.dazo|talk]]) 14:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*There's nothing on his early life and I conclude that it’s not fit for posting in its current state. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 16:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Oppose''' He is insignificant. Although he may be the heir, that is about the peak of his fame. Zanzibar is apart of Tanzania now and even then was a state that nobody cared about, both strategically and relevance. This would not be good for In the news but rather Did you know and even then, its very hard if that should appear on that page. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 01:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Obvious support''' -- Rest in Peace. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 17:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::FYI, for RD we normally only oppose due to the quality of the article. If it has an article, the subject is notable enough to appear in RD. [[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 01:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Per Schwede66. Article needs a lot more info such as about early life, which could be expanded a bit. Plus, there's some cn tags. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 01:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====RD: Linda Lavin==== |
|||
:So it happened. The article needs proper updates, but because of protection will take a bit longer than for unprotected articles. Shall we use the picture from the article? '''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate|recent deaths=yes|article=Linda Lavin|sources=[https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/linda-lavin-tony-winning-broadway-actress-starred-sitcom-117192234 (ABC)]|nominator=QalasQalas|nom cmt=great loss actress and she deserves|sign= --[[User:QalasQalas|QalasQalas]] 23:38, 2024 December 30 (UTC)}} |
|||
*'''Support''' speedy post <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 17:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''': Article looks fine except the whole filmography is unsourced. [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 01:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* [[Linda_Lavin#Acting_credits]] has remained largely unsourced. Please add more REFs. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 01:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== Ethiopian Truck Crash ==== |
|||
:'''Support''' once article is sufficiently updated [[User:Jbvann05|<span style="color: #00ff00">Jbvann05</span>]] 17:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
:'''support blurb''' Not much to say, this is a major event. <span style="background:linear-gradient(maroon,red,#ff8c00,#fc0,green,blue,#9400d3,#ff1493);border-radius:1em;color:#fff"> <b><i><small>4</small>🧚♂<small>am</small></i> [[User talk:4iamking|<span style="color:#fff">KING</span>]] </b></span> 17:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
|article = 2024 Sidama truck crash |image=Ethiopiantruckcrash.webp|blurb = [[Ethiopian]] [[truck]] crash kills 71 people.|altblurb = 71 people die in an [[Ethiopian]] [[truck]] crash|71 People dead after an [[Ethiopian]] Truck Crash| |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' [[User:Jip Orlando|Jip Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jip Orlando|talk]]) 17:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
altblurb2= [[2024 Sidama truck crash |'''A truck falls off a bridge''']] over the [[Ganale Doria River]] in [[Bona Zuria]], [[Sidama Region]], Ethiopia, killing 71 people and injuring 4 others.|sources = [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/30/at-least-71-people-killed-in-ethiopia-road-accident]|nominator = Alexgmail2000}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Article is a stub. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 12:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{ec}} '''Support''' - article is FA and importance isn't up for debate. [[User:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">'''PCN02WPS'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">contribs</span>]])</small> 17:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*It is no longer a stub, I believe. [[User:Ca|Ca]] <i><sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">[[User talk:Ca|talk to me!]]</sup></i> 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* |
:*:I still believe it is a stub / article needs expansion. [[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 16:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
* |
:*::Someone with local sources to help us? [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 17:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
* |
*'''Support''' Article is decent and significant as the [[Minas Gerais road crash]]. The year 2024 is ending very badly. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 12:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*Is "disaster" the right word for the article name? the sources seem to leave it as "accident" even with a toll that high? --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support and post immediately''' No question about the notability of a Queen who has been Britain's anchor for almost three quarters of a century. [[User:Aeromachinator|<b><span style="background-color: #005440; color: white">aeromachinator</span></b>]] [[User talk:Aeromachinator|<i><span style="background-color: #005440; color: white">(talk to me here)</span></i>]] 17:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Like [[Madan Ashrit Highway disaster]] and [[Westdene dam disaster]]. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 13:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The move from truck crash to this new title was not discussed and should be reverted. "[[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events)|Try to avoid the words '''disaster''', '''tragedy''' and '''crisis''']] because this characterization is too subjective. It is preferable to use specific event names, such as collision, collapse, explosion, outbreak, pandemic, sinking, oil spill, and the like." |
|||
*'''Suppport''' It should be up ASAP. [[User:Royal Autumn Crest|Royal Autumn Crest]] ([[User talk:Royal Autumn Crest|talk]]) 17:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Also '''Oppose''' on quality and sourcing. |
|||
* |
*:[[User:Dreameditsbrooklyn|Dreameditsbrooklyn]] ([[User talk:Dreameditsbrooklyn|talk]]) 16:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
* |
*::I moved the article. [[User:Ca|Ca]] <i><sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">[[User talk:Ca|talk to me!]]</sup></i> 16:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
* |
*'''Support''' The article significant because of many sources reported it numerous times. [[User:AsteriodX|AsteriodX]] ([[User talk:AsteriodX|talk]]) 15:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' on notabilty, '''Wait''' on quality, hopefully the article will improve eventually. [[User:ExclusiveEditor|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF7043,#FFCC80);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-left-radius:6px;border-bottom-left-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;">Exclusive</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#263238,#37474F);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-right-radius:6px;border-bottom-right-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:-1px;">Editor</span>]] [[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|<sub style="font-size:11px;color:#757575;font-style:italic;letter-spacing:.5px;">🔔 Ping Me!</sub>]] 17:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*'''Support''' What is it with disasters this week? '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 17:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
* |
*:@[[User:Setarip|Setarip]] what is with the entire year, so many incidents happening. its crazy, espically the latter half [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*::Oh and '''Support''' [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*''' |
*'''Oppose''' on article quality [[WP:STUB]] [[User:QalasQalas|QalasQalas]] ([[User talk:QalasQalas|talk]]) 20:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Wait''' for article quality then '''support altblurb2 without picture''' as the current image is too low quality. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 22:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::The image has been protected on commons, can be replaced here now by an admin I think. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17">nableezy</span>]]''' - 17:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Oppose''' [[bus plunge]] [[User:Orbitalbuzzsaw|This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang]] ([[User talk:Orbitalbuzzsaw|talk]]) 22:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Done. '''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 17:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:"Truck" plunge. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 00:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support blurb''', and please get her photo up and ditch the one of Truss. The Queen trumps her. [[User:W.carter|<em style="font-family:Verdana;color:DarkBlue">cart</em>]]<small>[[User talk:W.carter|'''<em style="font-family:Verdana;color:DarkBlue">-Talk</em>''']]</small> 17:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:This is actually a very good point about how news media, now with 24/7 operations, needs news to cover, and why as an encyclopedia we should be wary of giving attention to every single accident that gets reported.<span id="Masem:1735607177358:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*Support of course, should the blurb mention that [[Charles, King of the United Kingdom]] has become the new monarch? We usually announce new leaders. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 17:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' until article quality improves, then '''Support Altblurb 2''' due to the high number of casualties. ''P.S. is going into edit source the correct way to reply to an ITN nom? This is my first time and I couldn't find info about it.'' --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 00:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support on notability''' once the article is no longer a stub. high number of casualties, significant coverage. [[User:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:Teal;">Flip</b>]][[Special:Contribs/Flipandflopped|<sup style="color:purple">and</sup>]][[User talk:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:lime">Flopped</b>]] [[Wikipedia:Civility|<b style="color:grey"> ツ</b>]] 01:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::: Probably wait until crowned. He can still turn round and refuse it until then. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 17:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*Article is a stub and we don’t post those. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 16:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::He is already king though.-- [[User:Pawnkingthree|Pawnkingthree]] ([[User talk:Pawnkingthree|talk]]) 17:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Little encyclopedic value to our readers. [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 23:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Both BBC and CNN say that Charles immediately became King upon the Queen's death [[User:Scaramouche33|Scaramouche33]] ([[User talk:Scaramouche33|talk]]) 17:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
*:I'm trying to do something but no updates yet. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 00:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''support''' just posted N'orleans with a dozen dead. Only logical.[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 21:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Legally he is king whether he likes it or not. If he doesn't want to be king then Parliament would have to pass a law saying that he isn't king, [[His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936|as they did for Edward VIII]] (who was never crowned). '''''[[User:Hut 8.5|<span style="color:#b50000;">Hut 8.5</span>]]''''' 18:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::We can make an exception here. It's so tragical. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::::True but in this case I would suggest leaving him out of the blurb for now since the news coverage almost completely focuses on ''her'' death and not on ''his'' ascension. If and when news coverage becomes mainly about him, we can change it accordingly. Regards [[User:SoWhy|<span style="color:#7A2F2F;font-variant:small-caps">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="color:#474F84;font-variant:small-caps">Why</span>]] 18:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support in principle''' - This is a truly unusually high number of fatalities for a road accident. I'm not at all sympathetic to the terse deployment of 'bus plunge' as a 'reason' to oppose this nomination. It's an overused cliche used to dismiss genuinely significant stories from less-reported countries, simply because they feature a particular class of road accident. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 23:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::I think so, and if the name changes can update the blurb then. Think this can be closed though, blurb and photo are up with obvious consensus for it. Any further changes can happen at [[WP:ERRORS]]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17">nableezy</span>]]''' - 18:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
: |
*:{{ping|Schwede66}} we have a consensus here. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 23:34, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*::Nah, at 1106 B (172 words) "readable prose size", that is most certainly still a stub. And we don't post stubs. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 04:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*:::So, we have a consensus with a stub. Can anyone help us to expand it? [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 12:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*: |
*::::Though it ''was'' a truck that plunged this time, not a bus, I can't see how that small cosmetic difference turns the whole underlying story (as reported) into something fundamentally expandable. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 06:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose on quality''' but '''support on notability''' Horrifying accident, but the article's still a stub. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 02:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Post-blurb comment''' In terms of Charles, Buckingham Palace confirmed he was the King in the death announcement. And the Prime Minister confirmed that he was King Charles III in her speech. Something should be added to tbe blurb. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:[[WP:ERRORS]]. '''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 18:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*Two full stops at the end of the sentence-would be good if an admin can remove this. [[User:Blythwood|Blythwood]] ([[User talk:Blythwood|talk]]) 19:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{archive bottom}} |
|||
I previously posted this at [[Talk:Main Page#Upcoming Elizabeth II TFA]] and it was suggested that I come here instead. As is mentioned on that page in the previous discussion, [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 19, 2022|Elizabeth II is scheduled TFA for 19 September]] to coincide with the funeral. By then, it's very likely that [[Template:In the news|her ITN item]] will still be live. I suggest that for the time that the TFA is up, we change the ITN item so that the [[death and state funeral of Elizabeth II]] is in bold font. I say this for a variety of reasons: |
|||
*that article is in good shape |
|||
*it would appear strange to have a TFA and an ITM main item point to the same article |
|||
*to point to the funeral article on the day of the funeral would seem appropriate |
|||
Thoughts? '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color: #000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 05:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: Wanna nominate the funeral wikipage on the day of the funeral? God knows what newsworthy calamities await us over the next few days, bumping the current blurb off ITN soon. No doubt the funeral wikipage will get lots of support !votes then. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 10:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::I think this is an excellent idea, and would support this as proposed. What should the ITN situation be on September 20? Should we return the ITN setup to the death and ascendance, or should we keep it on the funeral after the TFA has ended? ~[[User:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 10:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::I don't mind whether it reverts to the current blurb or stays like that. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color: #000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 21:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::That somebody is buried after they die is not news, and if this gets bumped by other events then it shouldnt artificially be returned. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17">nableezy</span>]]''' - 21:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== |
== December 29 == |
||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/ |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 29]]}} |
||
{{Portal:Current events/ |
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 29}} |
||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
====(Posted) RD: James L. Fisher==== |
|||
==== (REVIEWERS NEEDED) RD: Lenny Randle ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Lenny Randle |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/01/sports/baseball/lenny-randle-dead.html ''The New York Times''] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.towson.edu/news/2022/message-on-passing-of-president-emeritus-james-fisher.html Towson University]; [https://foxbaltimore.com/newsletter-daily/towson-university-campus-mourns-the-death-of-former-university-president WBFF] |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Bagumba <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| updaters = |
| updaters = Bagumba |
||
| nom cmt = Has been called baseball’s version of the “most interesting man in the world"<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| nom cmt = |
|||
| sign = [[User: |
| sign = —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 13:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* Long enough (almost 400 words of prose). Formatting looks fine. Footnotes can be found at expected spots. [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1109557387&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig found no problems]. This wikibio is '''READY for RD'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 15:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 02:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====( |
==== (REVIEWERS NEEDED) RD: Dada Masilo ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Dada Masilo |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
| recent deaths = yes |
||
| sources = [https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/999748-2/ SABC] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/dagmar-schipanski-103.html tagesschau.de], [https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/panorama/dagmar-schipanski-tot-cdu-100.html ZDF], [https://www.bietigheimerzeitung.de/inhalt.parteien-cdu-politikerin-dagmar-schipanski-gestorben.10078208-20a4-4176-a631-9229f59f9307.html BZ] <!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = yes |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = Gerda Arendt |
|||
| updaters = Gerda Arendt |
|||
| updaters = Grimes2<!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Internationally acclaimed South African dancer and choreographer, who transformed classical ballets into stories about today's characters, in a fusion with contemporary dance and African dancing. The article was stubbish, with lost references. There's still room for more detail, but I'm looking at the next two already. |
|||
| nom cmt = German physicist and politician. Runner-up in the [[1999 German presidential election]]. Wikibio very much unsourced. Please add more REFs. --<!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
<!--| nominator = No need to send ITN nom credit to PFHLai. Thank you. --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 23:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Comment''' Added sources and added myself to updaters. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 13:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' no reason to oppose.[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 20:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD'''. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 02:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== 2024 Estlink 2 incident ==== |
||
Note that I've moved the item to 29 Dec, the date of the ship's transfer to [[Porvoo]] (see ALT2), as otherwise, this would be stale by now. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 18:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:Striking the stale original (25 Dec) blurb.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 10:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = 2024 Estlink 2 incident |
||
| image = File:Crude oil tanker Eagle S at Porvoo 2024-12-31 a.jpg |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = <s>The submarine power cable [[Estlink]] 2 '''[[2024 Estlink 2 incident|is damaged by an oil tanker suspected of belonging to Russia]]'''.</s> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.adn.com/outdoors-adventure/iditarod/2022/09/08/alaska-mushing-legend-lance-mackey-4-time-iditarod-champ-has-died-at-age-52/] |
|||
| recent deaths = no |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure -->Yes |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| nominator = Annwfwn <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| |
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
||
| altblurb = Finnish police take over oil tanker ''[[Eagle S]]'', suspected of '''[[2024 Estlink 2 incident|damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2]]'''. |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = [[Eagle S]], suspected of '''[[2024 Estlink 2 incident|damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2]]''', is transferred to [[Porvoo]] for investigation. |
|||
| sign = --[[User:Annwfwn|Annwfwn]] ([[User talk:Annwfwn|talk]]) 16:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sources = https://yle.fi/a/74-20133526 |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''': Most of the improvement to this article in recent times was a result of your typical WikiEd trainwreck, a group of editors eager to collaborate amongst themselves so long as they pass a class, and not the least bit interested in collaborating with the community at large. Here's what I came up with right off the top of my head: |
|||
#The order is extremely disjointed for a biography, as if to suggest that it was intended to be a fanboy exercise first and foremost. |
|||
#Too many primary sources. The sourcing in general resembles detritus found in incidental Google searches, missing a number of higher-quality sources (several books, for starters) |
|||
#Higher-quality sources have given significant weight to his pre-mushing career as a commercial fisherman and his resultant bouts of addiction. The article appears to gloss that over in favor of giving weight to fanboy trivia and recentism.[[User:RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> RadioKAOS </span>]]/[[User talk:RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> Talk to me, Billy </span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> Transmissions </span>]] 02:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::That WikiEd assignment ended in April 2021. Pretty sure the recent 40 or so edits in 2022 have nothing to do with that. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 14:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::I looked at the article and topic as a whole, not in a bubble driven by news of his death ("the sum total of human knowledge", right?). The ''[[Anchorage Daily News]]'', the source cited above, is a pitiful shell of its former self. Early versions of that story began with repeating the family's Facebook post, followed by repeating large portions of our article. Work commitments prevented me from following it further to see if it actually turned into a respectable journalistic piece. I'm sure none of that matters to those who believe RS is solely a matter of "Why, I found it on this website and not that website, so therefore...".[[User:RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> RadioKAOS </span>]]/[[User talk:RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> Talk to me, Billy </span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> Transmissions </span>]] 03:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* Apart from the issues brought up by RadioKAOS above, there are also a handful of {cn} tags that should be resolved before this nom can proceed. Please add more REFs. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 14:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:*You fail to disclose that those CN tags were placed by you, including one to a statement found in the ''Outside'' source. So this is another game of one group of editors sitting back and trying to force another group to do all the real work? That ≠ collaboration, my friend.[[User:RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> RadioKAOS </span>]]/[[User talk:RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> Talk to me, Billy </span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/RadioKAOS|<span style="color:green;"> Transmissions </span>]] 03:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::* Yes, I threw in some {cn} tags.... but, wait! game? sitting back and waiting for others to do work? Hmmm... look, RadioKAOS, if I am too involved in the writing, I should not help with reviewing and posting on MainPage. Kind of a conflict of interest there. Admins should not be showcasing one's own work on MainPage. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 12:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====(Posted) RD: Bernard Shaw ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Bernard Shaw (journalist) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/08/media/bernard-shaw-obituary/index.html CNN] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = NotAGenious <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = I'll try to combine https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eagle_S_on_the_map_of_MarineTraffic,_in_relation_to_the_Estlink_2_incident.png with the cropped version of the Estlink map if I get a chance to do so. A significant event mentioned in multiple international news sources. |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = |
| sign = [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 14:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Oppose''' as it's yet clear the exact cause, whether intentional sabotage or something else. Just having massive reporting doesn't necessarily make it an appropriate WP topic since WP is not a newspaper. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 16:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - article seems to meet requirements. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 15:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*:I disagree that finding an exact cause should be a requirement for appearing on the main page: the article, which has speculation from reliable sources, is useful by itself. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 18:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' since it's not the first cable damaged in the area this past month and I doubt the impact will be anywhere near the [[Nord Stream pipelines sabotage|Nord Stream sabotage]] in 2022. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 17:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD'''. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 06:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:SPECULATION]]. Sorry, but we don’t post speculations.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 18:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:it's confirmed that an outside force destroyed the cable, just the cause is under investigation [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 22:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' there's nothing speculative about an international sabotage incident that is an act of economic terrorism, and given the type of incident it is we may never know the full true story (just like in falsified elections for example), that shouldn't barr a posting though; [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] isn't a compelling argument either. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The blurb speculates that the incident was caused by a Russian oil tanker (this isn't even mentioned in the article). Furthermore, the article is in bad shape to demonstrate why this incident is significant.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 07:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::the article does mention it. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 11:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Now that it's improved, yes, but it didn't when I wrote the comment.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 13:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2024_Estlink_2_incident&oldid=1265510819 No, it was.] {{quote|the tanker Eagle S, registered to the Cook Islands and part of Russia's shadow fleet...}} |
|||
*::::{{quote|The police confirmed that the tanker is suspected of having caused the failure}} [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 14:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', although the blurb needs to be updated. A bigger story here is that Finland has seized a Russian tanker suspected of being involved in cutting the cable.[https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/26/world/europe/finland-estonia-cables-russia.html] [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 23:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' even on the off-chance it was accidental, still a series incident. [[user:dmartin969|–DMartin]] 01:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* I've added an alternative blurb and [[2024 Estlink 2 incident#Reactions|#Reactions]]. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 10:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Notified [[WT:FINLAND]] and [[WT:ESTONIA]] for further input here. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 18:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Per above, do not add votes without giving your reason. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 07:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::It's a major incident with huge coverage and international reactions. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 19:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - Unusual international incident that our well-sourced article is being updated on. No tags, though the redlinks are arguably distracting. NATO response is highly notable. Given increasing tensions in the Baltic and the continuing news coverage, this altblurb is a good fit for ITN. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 16:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support''' - There was a covering of the Baltic Sea Disruptions in current events a few weeks ago. This is also notable due to rising geopolitical tensions. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 19:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Anne Garrels ==== |
|||
*'''Support''' Important enough in the context of the present cold war between East and West. [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 02:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Is this stale? The earliest item on ITN is from December 26. [[User:Natg 19|Natg 19]] ([[User talk:Natg 19|talk]]) 07:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:If we're going with the alternative blurb, it's actually the 26th. If we want a blurb telling about the transfer to Porvoo for investigation, it was yesterday, the 29th. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::The admins didn't check the consensus in time. A pity. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:I've added a second alt blurb (transfer to Porvoo) and request further comments.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NotAGenious|contribs]]) 11:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*::Updated image. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 18:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' {{re|Abcmaxx|Dmartin969|ArionStar|SimpleSubCubicGraph|Tradedia}} The original blurb is now stale. Please confirm which, if any, of the alt blurbs is suitable.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 10:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:It is not suitable… a pity. :( [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 20:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::either altblurb is fine [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::either altblurb is fine. [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 09:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' whether stale or not. Article fails to demonstrate the impacts of the cable damage beyond what generally appear to be mild monetary concerns, without knowing how per-person energy prices will exactly be impacted by this. [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 20:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:what about the reactions on a political basis? [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 21:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' the newest alt-blurb. This is a widely reported story about a specific prominent incident relating to a signficant wider crisis. It's not covered by ongoing, and I think the strongly suspected involvement of the Russian government is very relevant. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 23:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment re: stale''' The orig blub was already stale by 29 Dec, when the oldest blurb was [[Manmohan Singh]]'s death on the 26th.[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&action=edit&oldid=1266069287]—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 07:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' The power failure is stale news. Blurbs should generally avoid speculation of what is suspected, leaving the nuanced NPOV details for the article. Stick to blurbing more tangible events like formal charges, sanctions, retaliation, etc.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 08:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' as per GenevieveDEon. The story now is not the power failure, but Finland's actions against the Russian shadow fleet. The way this nomination has evolved is very confusing, however. It would have been better to close the original nomination, and start a new one with the capture of the tanker by the Finns. [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 21:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====2024 Chadian parliamentary election==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| |
|article = 2024 Chadian parliamentary election |
||
|image= File:Flag of Chad.svg |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
|blurb = Chad holds its [[2024 Chadian parliamentary election|legislative elections]] that have been delayed several times since 2011. |
|||
| blurb = <!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
|||
|altblurb = |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
|altblurb2 = |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
|altblurb3 = |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
|recent deaths = no |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
|sources = [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/28/voting-begins-in-chad-as-opposition-parties-call-for-election-boycott] |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
|nominator = History6042 |
|||
| sources = [https://www.npr.org/2022/09/07/1121624031/anne-garrels-long-time-foreign-correspondent-for-npr-dies-at-71 NPR] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = ElijahPepe <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = Sunshineisles2 , Penlite |
|||
| nom cmt = Article could be improved, but nothing an RD nom hasn't been through. |
|||
| sign = <span style="font-family: monospace;">[[User talk:ElijahPepe|elijahpepe@wikipedia]] (he/him)</span> 23:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Wait''' until official results are in. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 01:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Reluctant oppose''' No results posted yet and otherwise, quality just isn't there. This nom is likely to roll off or become stale before either of those issues are addressed. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 19:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====(Posted blurb) RD/Blurb Jimmy Carter==== |
|||
*'''Comment''' Added citations and expanded the article a bit. {{s|Looks like there are still some claims in the career section that need sources, though}}.--[[User:Sunshineisles2|Sunshineisles2]] ([[User talk:Sunshineisles2|talk]]) 23:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
*'''Support''' - article seems to meet requirements. - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 07:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
|article = Jimmy Carter |
|||
* '''Posted'''. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 00:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
|image=File:JimmyCarterPortrait2.jpg |
|||
|blurb = Former American president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''' dies at the age of 100 |
|||
==== (Closed) Surgical amputation of a limb 31,000 years ago in Borneo ==== |
|||
|altblurb = Former United States president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''' dies at the age of 100. |
|||
{{atop |
|||
|altblurb2 = Former president of the United States and Nobel Peace Prize laureate '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''' dies at the age of 100. |
|||
| status = {{nac}} |
|||
|altblurb3 = [[Nobel Peace prize|Nobel Peace laureate]] and former U.S. President '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''', behind the [[eradication of dracunculiasis|campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis]], dies at 100. |
|||
| result = Consensus to post unlikely to emerge. [[User:Ktin|Ktin]] ([[User talk:Ktin|talk]]) 20:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
|recent deaths = yes |
|||
|sources = [https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2024/12/29/jimmy-carter-president-dead/ Washington Post] |
|||
|nominator = Nableezy |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
* ''' Definite Support''' No questions about it, as a former president and humanitarian that recently passed away. He a left lasting legacy and impact on the world. -- [[User:Rager7|<span style="background-color: red; color: blue">Rager7</span>]] ([[User talk:Rager7|talk]]) |
|||
* '''Support blurb''' - obviously. No quality concerns as its a GA. --[[User:Estar8806|estar8806]] ([[User talk:Estar8806|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/Estar8806 |★]] 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support blurb''' The death of a former US President is notable, and the story is being reported by basically every source. [[User:Gust Justice|Gust Justice]] ([[User talk:Gust Justice|talk]]) 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Strong support blurb''' - A bit more of an update is needed, and a few floating "is" etc are still about, but obviously this should be a blurb. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 21:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:These seem to have been fixed. [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::'''Strong support -''' Death of a former president. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 21:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: '''Strong support blurb''' Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. - [[User:Sebbog13|Sebbog13]] ([[User talk:Sebbog13|talk]]) 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: '''Strong support blurb''' Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. – <span style="font-family: Georgia;">'''''[[User:Illegitimate Barrister|Illegitimate Barrister]]'''''</span> ([[User_talk:Illegitimate_Barrister|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Illegitimate Barrister|contribs]]), 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Strong Support blurb''' - I've been vocal about the US-bias of many nominations here. But this is a no-brainer. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 21:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Strong support blurb''' This should be an uncontroversial one. No quality concerns. May he rest in peace. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 21:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support blurb''' no brainer, article is in good shape '''''[[User:Dora the Axe-plorer|Dora the Axe-plorer]]''''' ([[User talk:Dora the Axe-plorer|explore]]) 21:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''', Normally against US-bias but I think this is a fairly straightforward yes to a blurb here. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the King!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb with picture''' - extraordinarily influential figure, especially given his prolonged and impactful post-presidential career. [[User:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">'''PCN02WPS'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">contribs</span>]])</small> 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb''' Article is updated and a GA. [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted blurb''' [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Is it a caching error? I don't see it. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 21:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::It should be there now. I couldn't see it earlier either. [[User:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">Star</span><span style="color: purple">action</span>]] ([[User_talk:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contribs/Staraction|<span style="color: purple">contribs</span>]]) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' per above. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb/picture blurb''' GA article of a significant U.S. president. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Added altblurb2''' -- {{tooltip|AFAICT|as far as I can tell}} we usually say "president of X" not "X president", e.g. right now with Manmohan Singh. [[User:Giraffer|Giraffer]] ([[User talk:Giraffer|talk]]) 21:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Thanks for the correction! [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support''' I think it's pretty evident; rest well. [[User:BaronNishi|Nishi]] ([[User talk:BaronNishi|talk]] 21:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb with picture''', but suggest the following expansion to honor what he described as his most important legacy:{{tqb|''[[Nobel Peace Prize|Nobel Peace]] laureate and former U.S. President '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''', behind the [[eradication of dracunculiasis|campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis]], dies at 100.''}} [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 21:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Weak oppose''' only the part mentioning dracunculiasis, since it's only briefly mentioned once in the target article. '''Support''' everything else. [[User:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">Star</span><span style="color: purple">action</span>]] ([[User_talk:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contribs/Staraction|<span style="color: purple">contribs</span>]]) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I'm adding more; it's probably his most important work in terms of overall impact, but nobody's heard of it. Carter, along with [[Viktor Zhdanov]], is probably one of two human beings who can claim credit for eradicating a major disease. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 21:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::(BTW this isn't me saying this, it's Carter—seeing them dead was [https://www.vox.com/2015/8/20/9182531/jimmy-carter-guinea-worm his last wish].) [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 01:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Post-posting - [[User:Queen of Hearts|charlotte]], would you be willing to also add "Nobel laureate" to the blurb, as suggested by the blurbs listed? [[User:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">Star</span><span style="color: purple">action</span>]] ([[User_talk:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contribs/Staraction|<span style="color: purple">contribs</span>]]) 21:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I don't think him being a Nobel laureate is significant enough (relative to him being president) to include in the blurb, but happy to add it/have it added if consensus here/one of the ITN admins think it should be there. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 22:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::That was the blurb supported by everybody? '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 22:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose on quality''' (but its been posted so too late for this) - the article does not provide a reason why he was a great or major figure - even though I know this should be the case. The Legacy section addresses his mediocere presidency but does not touch on his post-presidency efforts which is where this factor is coming from. I know this can be made, either from existing sources or from the obits coming out, but this should really be in place, a crystal clear section for reader to review of why a person was posted as a blurb on death, rather than all the hand-waving that is going on. Also, we should not be assuming that every former world leader should be blurbed. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 21:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Your wishes are demanding. '''Support''' addition of Nobel Prize laureate, only presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Barack Obama, Al Gore (Vice) are recipients. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 22:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The final paragraph of the lede & the lengthy [[Jimmy Carter#Post-presidency (1981–2024)|Post-presidency (1981–2024) section]] do a fine enough job articulating his post-presidency efforts that opposing posting altogether is a bit much. That said, there is a lot of information in [[Post-presidency of Jimmy Carter]] which could be used to further expand the section on his main biographical page. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::The statement in the lede "but his post-presidency period (the longest in U.S. history) has received near-universal praise, including a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002." is not directly supported by sources in the bio article, though I'm sure the post-presidency article has that. This is a quality issue that should have been addressed before posting; I'm not doubting this, but absence of this type of information with sources on the main bio page ''is'' a problem even if that seems apparently obvious. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 04:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''' RIP. [[User:Davey2116|Davey2116]] ([[User talk:Davey2116|talk]]) 22:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' for it being posted. Storied career, amazing, that he had such long marriage. [[User:BilboBeggins|BilboBeggins]] ([[User talk:BilboBeggins|talk]]) 22:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''', at least he made it to 100. [[User:Sahaib|Sahaib]] ([[User talk:Sahaib|talk]]) 23:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Can Nobel laureate be added to the blurb as the nomination that all the support votes at the time of posting were referencing? Carters post-presidency is widely regarded as a defining trait of his life. '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 03:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support addition of Nobel laureate''', as this is prominently noted, often in the headlines, for major media sources covering this death. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 03:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''': Rest in peace to an incredible man, while not the most spectacular during his presidency, he definitely shaped a shining legacy after leaving office. Carter will continue to live on as one of the most memorable presidents the United States has ever had. [[User:Tofusaurus|Tofusaurus]] ([[User talk:Tofusaurus|talk]]) 03:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''' Article is in good shape, has been updated to the bone and Carter is an example of what warrants a death blurb. Remarkable legacy, treated harshly by history. Rest well, to a great humanitarian and humble being. '''Support adding Nobel to blurb''' I mean, he's also a nobel winner and most obits are including his laureate status to their headlines as well. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 08:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Added Nobel laureate'''. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 08:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{ping|Queen of Hearts}} please could you revert this. You were correct in your comment above. There is a standard format for death blurbs, particularly of former leaders, and we don't usually "editorialise" in ITN blurbs. Him being the preskdent is the reason he's blurbed rather than his Nobel prize, and it should simply state that, in the same way as the former Indian PM further down. Cheers — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 08:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::That isn’t editorializing and since when did we substitute an admins judgment over consensus for a blurb? '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 09:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::It's totally editorializing. Inserting fluff about Carter winning a Nobel prize that isn't really relevant to the story of his death. To maintain NPOV and avoid bias at ITN, we stick to a standard blurb format for all politician deaths rather than going with bespoke wording for individuals that people happen to like, based on whatever random [[WP:LOCALCONSENSUS]] forms. Henry Kissinger also won a Nobel prize, but our [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&oldid=1187974208 blurb on him] made no mention of that, so why the difference here? Admins are precisely supposed to use their judgment in these matters, as indeed charlotte did above, that's always been part of the remit. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 10:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::I have to agree with Amakuru, no need to add extra honours when its the office that he held that the vast majority of the world know him for. We didn't list Singh with his Indian of the Year or his Adam Smith awards so why do we need to further decorate Carter when President is prestigious enough. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the King!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 11:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Removed the Nobel. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 12:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::To be fair, the Adam Smith Prize or the Indian of the Year honor is not even close to the Nobel Prize. When [[Kofi Annan]] died, we [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&oldid=855638845 listed his Nobel honor] into the blurb. Same with [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&oldid=741794257 Shimon Peres]. [[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::That isn’t fluff, and there isn’t any overriding consensus that you can point to to claim that this is a local one that can be ignored. This is one of his main legacies, his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency. It is not fluff, it is not editorializing, and that part of the main page is not the fiefdom of a few admins here. This should be restored and this discussions consensus respected. '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 12:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Even if {{tq|his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency}}, a questionable premise, he would be notable for that and not for being a Nobel prize laureate. Look at the first sentence of his article as it's always been: Only mentions president (and later humanitarian), no mention of Nobel laureate. The article itself indicates that being a laureate wasn't notable at all in comparison to what he's actually primarily known for, which is a president of the United States. Therefore (imo), saying that he's a Nobel prize laureate in ITN would indeed fall under UNDUE editorializing fluff. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 02:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::{{tq|1=Only mentions president (and later humanitarian)}}<br>So... it mentions the work that earned him the Nobel Prize. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 02:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::::He's notable for his work as a president and a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate or the receiver or any other prizes (or otherwise) that resulted from his work as a president and a humanitarian. If you want to push for adding in the blurb that he was a humanitarian, be my guest. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 02:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::[[#c-BD2412-20241230173700-Masem-20241230130900|Its almost as if your point hadn’t been proven false before your first response here]] '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 03:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::::My point is that if the article indicates that Carter's notable for first being a president, and second being a humanitarian, ITN should reflect that and not go off on its own bizarre mini RFCs to establish local consensus about Carter's notability outside of the article's talk page. If you want to establish that Carter was as notable for being a Nobel lauereate as he was for being the president of the United States or a humanitarian, then first get that changed in the first sentence of the article and then come back here and have the blurb reflect this change. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 04:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::Every death blurb (for death by old age or other natural causes) leaves it as the principle profession that the person had, and avoids editorization. Definitely should not be adding "Nobel winner" here.<span id="Masem:1735564162709:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*:::And just to add, keeping the death blurb to just the profession prevents further bickering around the whole death blurb nomination aspect already. The inclusion of profession and profession only is a nice neutral way to present the blurb without trying to fight consensus on what other apsects to include. If the article is of good quality, other key factors (like Carter's humanitarism) should be identified within the lede.<span id="Masem:1735565861467:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*:::That isn’t true as demonstrated by the examples cited already. Whatever, this place doesn’t exactly abide by our rules anyway, what’s one more example? '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 13:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::: For the record, media reporting on the death widely reference the Nobel Prize in what would be the equivalent of our blurb. See: |
|||
*:::* ''Reuters'': "[https://www.reuters.com/world/us/jimmy-carter-former-us-president-nobel-peace-prize-recipient-dead-100-atlanta-2024-12-29/ Jimmy Carter, former US president and Nobel Peace Prize recipient, dead at 100]" |
|||
*:::* ''ABC News'' leads with "[https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/former-president-jimmy-carter-celebrated-champion-human-rights/story?id=3330353 Jimmy Carter, the former U.S. president known as a champion of international human rights both during and after his White House tenure and who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his lifetime of dedication to that cause, has died at 100]"; |
|||
*:::* ''The Washington Post'' leads with "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/12/29/jimmy-carter-death/ Jimmy Carter, a no-frills Southern governor with a mile-wide smile who was elected president in 1976 and served only one term before leading an extraordinary post-presidential life that included the Nobel Peace Prize, died Sunday at his home in Plains, Georgia...]"; |
|||
*:::* ''BBC News'' reports, "[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpww85w5p30o after leaving the White House with low approval ratings, his reputation was restored through humanitarian work which earned him the Nobel Peace Prize]"; |
|||
*:::* ''The Guardian'' reports that "[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/dec/29/jimmy-carter-death-president-reactions-latest-updates Carter spent the decades afterward focused on international relations and human rights, efforts that won him the Nobel peace prize in 2002]"; |
|||
*:::* The Associated Press blurb on the subject says "[https://apnews.com/article/jimmy-carter-dies-18c198c20352c835bca3eec276020dd7 Former President Jimmy Carter, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and the longest-living chief executive in U.S. history, has died]". |
|||
*::: This is not fluff, this is the key fact. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 17:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post posting support blurb''' No brainer support for death of former head of state/government. News across the world, article is in fantastic shape. Cheers, ''atque supra''! [[User:Fakescientist8000|Fake]][[User talk:Fakescientist8000|scientist]][[Special:Contributions/Fakescientist8000|8000]] 13:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' inclusion of '''Nobel Prize''' and agree with other supporters above, his article quotes {{xt|Polls of historians and political scientists generally rank Carter as a below-average president. Scholars and the public more favorably view his post-presidency}}, and winning a noble prize precisely shows this with other things. It may seem editorializing to few, but many disagree. [[User:ExclusiveEditor|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF7043,#FFCC80);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-left-radius:6px;border-bottom-left-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;">Exclusive</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#263238,#37474F);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-right-radius:6px;border-bottom-right-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:-1px;">Editor</span>]] [[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|<sub style="font-size:11px;color:#757575;font-style:italic;letter-spacing:.5px;">🔔 Ping Me!</sub>]] 17:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' This was closed, who reopened it? Can someone re-close it? Further blurb deliberation should be at [[WP:ERRORS]]. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 17:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:This is an editorial decision, not a content error.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 19:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Significant blurb changes are at ITNC. Errors are used only for small corrections.<span id="Masem:1735586159648:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 19:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Support including something about the humanitarian post-presidency career''' (e.g. the Nobel), which is ''the'' thing Carter is known for. It would make more sense to cut out the presidency TBH. (Though I wouldn't do that either). [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 19:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''': all blurbs in this widely-supported nomination mention the Nobel Peace Prize, showing a ''very'' clear consensus for its inclusion. So why are we unilaterally ''not'' including it? [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 21:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Adding my '''support''' for including "Nobel Peace Prize laureate" in the blurb; his post-presidency was arguably as transformative as his time as president, and has received comparable RS coverage in the obits. Given that all the proposed blurbs included the Nobel, I did not feel the need to state this in my !vote above. [[User:Davey2116|Davey2116]] ([[User talk:Davey2116|talk]]) 22:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' mention of Nobel Prize per Amakuru as it is editorializing the blurb to choose to add that secondary piece of info, which wasn’t included in Henry Kissinger’s blurb. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<span style="color:#D60047">B</span><span style="color:#F0A000">zw</span><span style="color:#00A300">ee</span><span style="color:#0A47FF">bl</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 05:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{ec}} '''Restored Nobel''' to the blurb. It's been in the blurb candiates from the beginning, and there is consensus since the post for its inclusion. As mentioned above with Annan and Peres previously, it's not unprecedented. In other fields, I also see some recent examples beyond a simple listing of their occupation.[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=1155978548][https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=1218115233] This is not required, and there are merits to avoiding squabbles with a more vanilla blurb. But there's no current rule at [[WP:ITN]] barring it, and the community can apply [[WP:WEIGHT]], where needed, as was done here. This is consistent with the [[WP:YESPOV]] policy: {{tq2|As such, the neutral point of view does not mean the exclusion of certain points of view; rather, it means including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight.}}—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 05:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The community establishes WP:WEIGHT in the article's talk page, not in ITN. The article indicates that Carter is first and foremost notable for being a president and secondarily as a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate. If ITN doesn't directly reflect that's written in the corresponding article, this sets a ridiculous precedent where anything can be written in ITN blurbs so long as there is local consensus for it here (if tomorrow we'll have a blurb that Carter has come back to life while the article's obviously unchanged, and enough people vote for that blurb, would that also be posted?) ITN discussions have significantly less editorial rigor and oversight than an actual article talk page, and shouldn't be the place to make substantive arguments about content, especially ones that very clearly would not, and have not, passed in the article's talk page itself (e.g. in this case that Carter's Nobel prize is anywhere near as notable as his occupation as a president). [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 06:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::{{tq|this sets a ridiculous precedent|q=yes}}: I had written, "This is not required". This blurb, in itself, does not set a precedent, any more than Annon or Peres did. The community is free to update [[WP:ITNBLURB]] to provide more guidance to posters on blurbs w.r.t. article leads, if there is consensus. Regards. —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 07:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::He was a noted humanitarian, not a Nobel prize winner. And which Nobel anyways? Explains nothing about what the prize was for. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 09:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::The blurb says <u>Nobel Peace</u>. Nobody had proposed ''humanitarian'' in the blurb, but feel free to gain consensus whether it makes more sense to be generic. —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 09:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''' for inclusion of some mention of his post-presidency humanitarian efforts, whether that means mentioning the Nobel Peace Prize or some other language. (I already !voted so this second !vote is only on the language and not the notability or quality.) It isn't a double standard that we didn't mention this for Kissinger. It was simply less relevant for Kissinger and more relevant for Carter. The post-presidency work Carter did to earn that Nobel was arguably more transformative than anything he did in his role as president, so mentioning it separately from his presidency makes sense. The same can't be said of Kissinger. I'd still be fine with replacing the word Nobel Laureate with the word humanitarian since some editors take issue with the decoration, but I'm also fine with just leaving it how it is right now and keeping the Nobel Laureate phrasing. Just as long as the phrasing acknowledges that this is a unique case where him being the president was perhaps not even the most important thing he did with his life. This isn't setting a dangerous precedent or slippery slope, he legitimately may be the only president in US history and one of few leaders worldwide who left the highest office in the land and then went on to do bigger and better things after that. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 14:26, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{tq|simply less relevant for Kissinger}} is an opinion and the double standard here. Both individuals won a Nobel prize, and the articles of both individuals indicate that neither are notable for receiving that Nobel prize. The only discernible difference is personal opinion in ITN. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 15:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::It ''would'' be a double standard if my position was that the Nobel Prize is itself inherently blurbworthy, but that isn't my view. It's worth mentioning separately for Carter because the reason ''why'' he received the award was for noteworthy contributions separate from his presidency. Kissinger's award was for his official duties as the Secretary of State, not for something separate. It's not about liking Carter more than Kissinger. For transparency I also won't deny that myself and likely many others ''do'' hold Carter in higher regard than Kissinger, but this isn't relevant to the discussion or the reasoning. It's simply about communicating that Carter's post-presidency is at least half of the reason why he's blurbworthy, even to those who are against blurbing just any former US president. With Kissinger, his time as Secretary of State was the sole reason. As I said before, I'm fine with replacing the award with the word humanitarian if it looks too decorative. I just don't take issue with the current wording. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 16:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Yeah, then say humanitarian, not nobel laureate. Ok, it looks like this isn't going to change, but this is an error that'll come back to bite us the next time somebody decides to editorialize some other news event. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 16:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Removed) Remove Ongoing: 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon |
||
<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
||
| blurb = |
| blurb = <!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
||
| ongoing = |
| ongoing = rem <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
||
| sources = |
| sources = <!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
||
| updated = |
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Khuft <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
||
| nom cmt = The Ongoing section would benefit from some shortening, and this item seems like the best candidate for removal. The Israeli incursion in Lebanon is not in the news anymore (and the last event mentioned in the article dates back to 17 Dec). This is in contrast to the war in Gaza, or Israel's actions in Yemen, which are much more prominently covered in global news. <!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| nom cmt = <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = [[User: |
| sign = [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 19:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
||
:'''Support removing'''—looks like the most sensible thing to trim. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 23:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
:'''Weak Oppose''' Doesn't seem too notable for the news, but is an amazing accomplishment regardless. [[User:InvadingInvader|InvadingInvader]] ([[User talk:InvadingInvader|talk]]) 16:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*Why did you nominate this, {{u|Count Iblis}}?--'''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 17:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*: The question rather is...why does Count Iblis make nominations that might as well seem facetious? Suggesting snow close. [[User:Alsoriano97|_-_Alsor]] ([[User talk:Alsoriano97|talk]]) 18:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::<small>It's his nature. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per InvadingInvader. Amazing? Yes. Significant news? Clearly no. Count Iblis should better try nominating this for DYK. [[User:Arado Ar 196|<span style="color: blue; font-weight: bold;">a!</span>]]rado ([[Special:Contributions/Arado Ar 196|C]]✙[[User talk:Arado Ar 196|T]]) 19:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Stale by about 31,000 years. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 19:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
==== (Closed) Brazil celebrates its 200th anniversary of independence ==== |
|||
{{atop |
|||
| status = {{nac}} |
|||
| result = Consensus not likely to emerge toward posting. Closing a good faith nomination. Please feel free to revert if someone has a different opinion. [[User:Ktin|Ktin]] ([[User talk:Ktin|talk]]) 21:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Strong oppose''' the only reason nothing is happening is because the [[2024 Israel–Lebanon ceasefire agreement]] is in place. However than will end soon as it is only a 60 day ceasefire. 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) [[User:History6042|<span style="color:darkorange">History6042😊</span>]] '''([[User talk:History6042|<span style="color:blue">Contact me</span>]])''' 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:If it ends and the war restarts, we post again [[User:PrecariousWorlds|PrecariousWorlds]] ([[User talk:PrecariousWorlds|talk]]) 07:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''': Im wondering if maybe we need to do a () next to [[Israel-Hamas war]] with all of the other Middle East battles that are also involving Israel, like Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, so on. [[User:TheCorriynial|TheCorriynial]] ([[User talk:TheCorriynial|talk]]) 20:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::There was a recent suggestion to include the entire listing of conflicts in the Middle East, but the problem is that they are not all directly related. While we can point to the Israel-Lebonon conflict as directly related to the Israel-Hamas one, events in Yemen or Syria are absolutely not part of that. That makes it all synthesis to combine them all. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 21:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support removing''', no updates recently. [[User:BilboBeggins|BilboBeggins]] ([[User talk:BilboBeggins|talk]]) 22:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support removing''' This is no longer hot, as indicated by lack of recent updates. There are low intensity incidents happening and might continue for months, but does not justify "Ongoing". [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 02:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Strong oppose''' not only has Israel violated the ceasefire almost every single day its been in force, but there is no signs that they are going to continue the ceasefire after its 60 days. [[User:Scu ba|<span style="color: red">'''Scu'''</span>]][[User talk:Scu ba|<span style="color:blue">ba</span>]] 15:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Ongoing is not about if the event is still going on, but if the target article or an appropriate subarticle has been receiving updates, which has not been happening here.<span id="Masem:1735572289131:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 15:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Support removal''' Lack of recent updates; per nom. If hostilities resume after the ceasefire, this can be re-nominated for addition at that time. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 06:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Removed''' There's consensus for removal. If things flare up again, for example when the ceasefire expires, we can re-evaluate the situation. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 07:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) Houston Tornado Outbreak ==== |
|||
{{Atop|Good faith nom, but clear consensus against. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 23:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article=Tornado outbreak of December 28–29, 2024|image=File:December 28, 2024, storm clouds 02.jpg |
|||
| blurb= Tornado outbreak in the Houston Area killing 2 people and injuring many others |
|||
| altblurb= 2 people dead after tornado outbreak in the Houston area}} |
|||
* <s>'''Support''' but with a completely reworded blurb. Three or more are dead, so the blurb is innacurate. How about "At least three people are killed during '''[[Tornado outbreak of December 28–29, 2024|a widespread tornado outbreak]]''' across the [[Southern United States]]." I oppose adding an image as of now.</s> |
|||
::Meh. '''oppose''' per below. [[User:EF5|<span style="color:#A188FC;">'''E'''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:EF5|<span style="color:#A188FC;">'''F'''</span>]]</sub><sup>[[User:EF5/Creations|<span style="color:#A188FC;">'''5'''</span>]]</sup> 20:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose'''. Seems pretty minor, hard to find coverage outside the US media. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 20:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong oppose''' - not important overall. {{ping|EF5}} we hardly post tornado outbreaks on ITN, and the smallest one I think that got posted was Rolling Fork's outbreak. The most recent was March 31, 2023, and almost every outbreak since then (with the possible exceptions of May 25 and April 26) have been well below the bar of importance for ITN. I'll add '''conditional weak support''' if the record-breaking claim of the Port Arthur tornado's duration is confirmed, but I highly doubt that. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 20:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Not significant, at least not yet. Very minor. '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 20:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' The oddness here is how late in the year this came, likely a result of global warming, but even with that, the relatively small death toll makes this a minor outbreak in the larger scheme of things. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 21:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Late-season outbreaks have always happened. We posted the last big December outbreak ([[Tornado outbreak of December 10-11, 2021|the one in Kentucky, USA]]) on merit as an outbreak, not based on climate change. I couldn't tell you why actual climate-change related blurbs (such as the yearly "hottest day in history" blurbs) never get posted. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 21:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::Because as long as there's little progress to stall climate change by major nations, these records are always going to get broken year after year. And the 2021 outbreak was likely posted due to the high death toll (70+).<span id="Masem:1735511037173:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 22:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Strong Oppose''' Tragic, but it’s a typical tornado outbreak. Two deaths is very small compared to very notable tornado outbreaks like the 2011 Super Outbreak. '''[[User:INeedSupport|<span style="color:#00FF00"><big>I</big></span>]]<span style="color:#C0C0C0">Need</span>[[User_talk:INeedSupport|<span style="color:#FF0000">Support</span>]]''' 🎄 21:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{Abot}} |
|||
==== (Posted) 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis |
||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
| image = Tbilisi - election protests 28 October 2024.jpg<!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
||
| blurb = '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis]]''' continues with [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] inaugurated and [[Salome Zourabichvili]] claiming to remain [[President of Georgia|President]].<!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
|||
| blurb = [[Brazil]] celebrates its 200th anniversary of independence (from [[Portugal]]). |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
| altblurb = '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis]]''' continues with [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] inaugurated while [[Salome Zourabichvili]] says she remains [[President of Georgia|President]].<!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
||
| altblurb2 = Amidst '''[[2024–2025 Georgian post-election protests|opposition protests]]''', [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] inaugurated [[President of Georgia]]. |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
|altblurb3 = '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis|A governmental crisis]]''' occurs in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], as [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] is inaugurated as [[President of Georgia|president]] while incumbent [[Salome Zourabichvili]] intends to remain in office. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.gov.br/en/government-of-brazil/latest-news/2022/in-2022-brazil-celebrates-the-200th-year-of-her-independence GOV.BR] |
|||
|altblurb4 = [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] is inaugurated as [[President of Georgia]] while incumbent [[Salome Zourabichvili]] intends to remain in office amidst '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis|a constitutional crisis]]'''. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/29/new-georgian-president-sworn-in-as-predecessor-refuses-to-stand-aside ''Al Jazeera'']; [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/29/georgia-president-sworn-in-protests-zourabichvili-kavelashvili ''The Guardian'']; [https://apnews.com/article/georgia-president-zourabichvili-russia-kavelashvili-215020983cefb6ce1eb2ecad184a9c1e Associated Press]; [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rn2w0zw08o ''BBC'']<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Boud <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = Boud<!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = The [[2024–2025 Georgian post-election protests]] that have accompanied this crisis have been ongoing daily for two months with the biggest participation estimated at around 100,000 people - several percent of the total Georgian population.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 11:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
* ''Comment'' The expression "claiming that" is a bit [[WP:WEASEL]]ly; {{tq|and [[Salome Zourabichvili]] stating that she retains her legitimacy as [[President of Georgia|President]]}} would be more neutral, avoiding the connotation that Wikipedia is sceptical about her POV. I've added ''altblurb'' which seems less weaselly to me. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 11:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''Neutral''' This seems like something that would be a bit more of a domestic event, but the 200th anniversary is generally notable for a country.<br/> However, I'm searching through archives of ITN, and I can't find anything on ITN celebrating China's 70th anniversary, so I don't think Consensus is in favor of these anniversaries. I don't know what to think; 200 years is a BIG milestone, and Brazil is a BIG country, but do milestones generally get inserted into here? [[User:InvadingInvader|InvadingInvader]] ([[User talk:InvadingInvader|talk]]) 16:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Ongoing?''' The nomination is not clear whether it's proposing this as an ongoing entry. Many other places have ongoing political tensions and rivalries so I reckon we need some big incident or civil war for this to stand out. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 12:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The event itself - the overall crisis - is ongoing, but the Western mainstream media news coverage is not intense enough to justify ''ongoing'' in the ITN sense. This is not a proposal for ITN "Ongoing". In terms of the wording, it would be inaccurate to suggest that today's inauguration was a sudden crisis - it's a key symbolic event within the overall crisis - so "continuing" in the blurb is accurate. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 12:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Definitely has more encyclopedic value than the electoral college vote a few weeks earlier. Depending on how the world reacts, it could be a repeat of the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. [[User:Scaramouche33|Scaramouche33]] ([[User talk:Scaramouche33|talk]]) 13:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong Oppose''' There is a similar [[Constitutional crisis#Somalia|'''Ongoing''']] [[constitutional crisis in Somalia]], [[WP:ITNUPDATE]]. [[User:QalasQalas|QalasQalas]] ([[User talk:QalasQalas|talk]]) 16:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Unfortunately, this is something that we'd normally handle through [[WP:OTD]] or as a [[WP:TFA]]. Something really significant and actually newsworthy would need to occur at the celebrations for them to be nominated at ITN. '''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 17:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*''' |
*:'''Response''' Somalia has been in a civil war for decades now, it has gotten its place in the spotlight but has faded away with time. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 19:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''<strike>strong</strike> weak support altblurb2''' came here to nominate it, glad to see I was beaten to it. The inauguration is perhaps more important than the non-popular election itself with the repercussions per Scaramouche33 (day-before form PM and GD leader was sanctioned with many other by the state department). What the now former president claims is not relevant ''encyclopaedically''/ITN. It is for the sub-article/s though. <strike>She'll likely be arrested before the new year if not tonight. It's 21:15 atm.</strike> [https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2024/12/29/salome-zourabichvili-vacates-georgias-presidential-palace-as-her-replacement-is-inaugurated-en-news Doesn't seem like much more than western msm blather quoting a french woman, she has left the presidential palace], despite [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/27/lets-see-who-will-be-leaving-georgias-presidential-standoff-nears-crunch-point claiming there is a train there and who will move her].[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 17:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per LaserLegs. ~200 countries celebrate an independence every year. Why is Brazil's more important than any other's? [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 18:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*: |
*:'''Support''' Definitely something to take note of. Additionally, I suspect Russia might invade Georgia again, to prop up the Dream Party. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 19:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
* '''Support altblurb 3''' per above. Added altblurb 3. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose:''' This is news 200 years old. For starters, make an article [[Brazil Bicentennial]], and if something truly newsworthy takes place in it (beyond just the anniversary itself) we may discuss that. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 18:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::''oppose'' '''altblurb3''' she has left the presidential palace. She cannot conduct an enforeceable actions such as signing bills.[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak support''' No one knows who the president of georgia is now, but it is an inauguration '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
::everybody knows who the new prez is after being sworn in with his predecessor leaving the presidential palace.[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Leaving [[Orbeliani Palace]] has some but not much significance; it's not ''the'' presidential palace, it's ''a'' presidential palace; Zourabichvili was the first president to reside there: [https://agenda.ge/en/news/2018/2530 "Salome Zurabishvili to relocate Presidential Residence from Avlabari to Orbeliani Palace", 29 Nov 2018]. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 01:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Important enough in the context of cold war between East and West. Georgia is one of the battlegrounds. [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 02:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak support''' Article is a bit short for a leadership dispute of this magnitude, but it's good enough for posting. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 08:42, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Support''' Per TDKR. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 13:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::@admins, please, check the consensus. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:''Comment'' The article has increased in length, and attracting more editors to [[Template:Georgian political crisis|these articles]] would be useful, since the situation is even more complicated than stated in any of the blurbs: most of the sources seem to say that the ''de facto'' ruler of Georgia is a third person, [[Bidzina Ivanishvili]], but they also consider it so obvious ("everyone" knows it) that it's not worth paying much attention to. Wikipedia content about his role in this context will improve with more people editing with good sources. I'm ''not'' proposing to change the blurb further - I would go for either ''Alt I'' or ''Alt IV''. (''Alt II'' seems a bit narrow, focussing on the protests rather than the broader political/institutional crisis. ''Alt III'' is not quite correct, since in principle, the government is run by the prime minister.) [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 18:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::Blurb IV is ready. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 20:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - A major political crisis. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 23:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{ping|Schwede66}} It's ready. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 14:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' ALT4. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 18:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
====(Posted) Jeju Air Flight 2216==== |
||
{{ITN candidate|article=Jeju Air Flight 2216|image=File:Boeing 737-8AS Jeju Air HL8088 3012 (MSN 37541) Cheongju Intl Airport May 14, 2021.jpg |
|||
{{archivetop|Consensus against posting. I know I am closing this only after a couple of hours, so feel free to reopen if you have some really strong arguments the consensus can change. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 20:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
|blurb=A Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 '''[[Jeju Air Flight 2216|crashes]]''' at [[Muan International Airport]], South Korea, after hitting a fence while attempting to land with 47 casualties reported out of 181 passengers on board.|altblurb=At least 47 people are killed when a Jeju Air plane carrying 181 passengers '''[[Jeju Air Flight 2216|crashed]]''' at [[Muan International Airport]] in South Korea.|altblurb2='''[[Jeju Air Flight 2216]]''' crashes at [[Muan International Airport]], South Korea, killing at least 47.|sources=[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-29/plane-crashes-at-s-korea-airport-killing-at-least-23-yonhap?utm_source=website&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy (Bloomberg)]|creator=Dora the Axe-plorer|nominator=QalasQalas|nom cmt=I think it needs a bit of work.}} |
|||
*'''Support''' Absolutely horrific footage, definitely worthy of the front page. --[[User:MaximumMangoCloset|MaximumMangoCloset]] ([[User talk:MaximumMangoCloset|talk]]) 02:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' holiday season is deadly this year. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Terrible year for Korea [[User:PrecariousWorlds|PrecariousWorlds]] ([[User talk:PrecariousWorlds|talk]]) 11:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Absolutely three deadly crashes within a month. [[User:QalasQalas|QalasQalas]] ([[User talk:QalasQalas|talk]]) 02:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' A no brainer, major plane crash with dozens of fatalities. [[User:JDiala|JDiala]] ([[User talk:JDiala|talk]]) 02:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support Alt Blurb III''' Article probably needs its quality improved, but absolutely a notable event. [[User:RandomInfinity17|RandomInfinity17]] <small>([[User talk:RandomInfinity17|talk]] - [[Special Contributions/RandomInfinity17|contributions]])</small> 02:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support Alt Blurb II''' in line with the Flight 8243. Also, the death toll has reportly risen to 47. [[User:Unnamelessness|Unnamelessness]] ([[User talk:Unnamelessness|talk]]) 02:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Considering that if the death count ends up being over 132 it will have been the deadliest crash since 2020, this is quite a major incident and it deserves to be here. (offtopic but why was both the start and end of this year so bad for aviation?) <span style="background:#000dff; padding:2px;">'''[[User:Interstatefive|<span style="color:white;">interstate</span>]][[User talk:Interstatefive|<span style="color:white;">five</span>]]''' </span> 02:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' could become the deadliest crash this year with 178 possible fatalities and its already the second deadliest. [[User:Bloxzge 025|Bloxzge 025]] [[User talk:Bloxzge 025|(talk)]] 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST) |
|||
*'''Strong Support''' Dozens of fatalities have been found. Major news coverage. Article is a bit short but that is because there is no conclusive info yet, as the incident happened three hours ago. [[User:Wildfireupdateman|Wildfireupdateman]] [[User talk:Wildfireupdateman|(talk)]] 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST) |
|||
*'''Support''' seems to have extensive coverage from South Korean News sources, some western sources are also picking up on the accident. [[User:Yosh56|Yosh56]] [[User talk:Yosh56|(talk)]] 10:02 PM. 28 December 2024 (EST) |
|||
*'''Strong support altblurb 2'''. For a new disaster article less than half an hour old it's of fantastic quality. This might be less geopolitically important than the crash in Kazakhstan but the human toll is telling. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 03:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' Altburlb II Fatality numbers can be updated via [[WP:ERRORS#Errors with "In the news"]]. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 03:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== December 28 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 28]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 28}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
---- |
|||
==== RD: Mary Anne Krupsak ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Mary Anne Krupsak |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| article2 = Keira Walsh |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/02/nyregion/mary-anne-krupsak-dead.html] |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| blurb = In [[association football]], '''[[Keira Walsh]]''' joins [[FC Barcelona Femení]] for a '''[[List of most expensive association football transfers#Women|world-record fee]]''' of £400,000. |
|||
| creator = |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| nominator = Engineerchange |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| updaters = CmdrDan, Connormah |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Lieutenant governor of New York |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sign = --[[User:Engineerchange|Engineerchange]] ([[User talk:Engineerchange|talk]]) 15:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2022/09/07/barcelona-manchester-city-agree-world-record-400000-keira-walsh/ Telegraph], [https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/62820169 BBC] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = Kingsif <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = Kingsif |
|||
| nom cmt = Nominating before transfer window closes (though it is only in an hour) as I anticipate debate. On the one hand, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates/August_2017#%5BPosted%5D_Neymar we posted] Neymar's record in 2017 and, given the different markets, an equivalent posting of the women's record would make sense. On the other, Pernille Harder as the previous women's record doesn't appear to have been nominated in 2020. Perhaps this can be attributed to lots of men's football enthusiasts and few women's football enthusiasts being active on Wikipedia, but perhaps more likely is that, while certainly growing, women's football still wasn't a mainstream sport in Europe then, while it is now. It can also be said that Harder's fee was not much larger than a 20-year record, while Walsh's is considerably bigger in relative terms.<br>I would suggest looking at the Neymar discussion, because there are other comparisons between that deal and Walsh's, namely, the drama involved and how much larger than the previous record the new one is. And should it get to posting, there are images to choose from. I have phrased the blurb in the format of the posted blurb for Neymar, rather than the nom. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 15:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*''' |
*'''Support''' Sources {{ok}}, no dead refs, size {{ok}}, high quality NYT obit. Summary: passed. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 17:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*{{tq|Krupsak, however, was the first woman nominated for (and elected to) the lieutenant governorship}} is a key sentence in this bio and it's unreferenced. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 19:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak oppose''' - I also don't agree with posting the Neymar transfer. But the rationale of the consensus was that it was not just an important sports story, but also a major global event with extensive news coverage, in such a manner that made it almost ''sui generis''. I'm not sure if we're seeing quite the same impact with the Walsh transfer.--'''[[User:WaltCip|🌈<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">WaltCip</span>]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 15:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{Added}} Ref: New York's first female lieutenant governor, Mary Anne Krupsak, has died at age 92. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 20:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:*That may be the detriment to nominating early to generate discussion; the transfer window closed five minutes ago, and it got a breaking news bulletin on the BBC. Perhaps the story will be bigger, perhaps it won't, but we can only see that over the next day or so. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 16:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment:''' Pretty close, but article could use some additional info regarding what she accomplished in her position as Lieutenant Governor. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 05:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. This will open the floodgates if this gets posted. Record men's basketball player, then women's basketball player? What about volleyball? Rugby? Handball? Baseball? It will cause all sort of conundrums, and whilst an interesting story even if two non-sporting businesses did a record deal in a particular sector it wouldn't get posted. Neymar was slightly different in that it was a world record across all sports and received much more coverage, but if for example another men's player breaks the record again I'm not sure that would get posted now, especially when salary and bonuses are much more at play than transfer fee alone.[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 15:51, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' even considering the record amount. One previous posting should not be taken as consensus to post more like it. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 15:57, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''', This topic is journalistic and not suitable for wikipedia. [[User:Alex-h|Alex-h]] ([[User talk:Alex-h|talk]]) 16:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::This is ITN... [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 16:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::ITN's purpose is to feature articles that happen to be in the news, and not itself to be a news source. Hence why we always go on about not being a new ticker. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 19:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::'''Oppose''', this is really something that pertains to sports, which based on consensus on Serena Williams' retirement, doesn't usually belong here. [[User:InvadingInvader|InvadingInvader]] ([[User talk:InvadingInvader|talk]]) 16:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Incremental update. No disrespect meant to Walsh, but do we know if she's still got this record even a year from now? Good DYK piece. [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 18:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' – Per ''Alex''. Meh. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{archivebottom}} |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Martin Karplus ==== |
|||
====Ugandan landslides disaster==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Martin Karplus |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = '''[[2022 Kasese District landslides|15 people are killed]]''' when heavy rain causes [[landslide]]s in the [[Kasese District]], [[Uganda]]. |
|||
| sources = [https://www. |
| sources = [https://www.magnifuneralhome.com/martinkarplus] |
||
| |
| updated = yes |
||
| |
| creator = |
||
| nominator = |
| nominator = Grimes2 |
||
| updaters = Grimes2, Math-ghamhainn |
|||
| sign = [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = Theoretical chemist, Nobel Prize laureate |
|||
| nom cmt = Breaking news, I have just created the article with 1 sentence just to get the article started, I appreciate it can be difficult to find Ugandan sources but any help will be much welcome, will attempt to help when I can too. Nominated to draw attention to disaster. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 15:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*Unreferenced date of birth. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 19:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' not even a stub. The article and the blurb are equal. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 13:55, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
*:{{Done}} [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 20:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Posted to RD'''. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 05:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Update''' Added a lot more refs, expanded; now have a start ready to expand on it.[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 14:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:[[WP:PROSELINE]] still doesn't communicate more than a landslide happened and X people were killed. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 15:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' for now. It's a stub at 820 B (137 words) at this moment. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 19:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Shigeko Sasamori ==== |
|||
:'''Oppose''' for now per Muboshgu. It's been three days, still a stub. [[Special:Contributions/208.92.242.44|208.92.242.44]] ([[User talk:208.92.242.44|talk]]) 04:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Shigeko Sasamori |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/28/world/asia/shigeko-sasamori-dead.html NYT] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| creator = TJMSmith |
|||
| nominator = TJMSmith |
|||
| updaters = |
|||
| nom cmt = Survivor of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and an advocate for peace and nuclear disarmament. Died on December 15. Death reported on December 28. |
|||
| sign = [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] ([[User talk:TJMSmith|talk]]) 02:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Support''' The article is mainly based on the NYT obit, but this is ok. Every paragraph is sourced. 2989 characters (465 words) "readable prose size". Article was created on December 31, 2024. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 16:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted to RD'''. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 05:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Kari Dziedzic ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Kari Dziedzic |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = [[Albania]] and [[Iran]] sever all '''[[Albania–Iran relations|diplomatic ties with each other]]'''. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.mprnews.org/story/2024/12/28/former-minnesota-senate-majority-leader-kari-dziedzic-dies-following-cancer-battle ‘’Minnesota Public Radio’’] |
|||
| sources = [https://www.reuters.com/world/albania-cuts-iran-ties-orders-diplomats-go-after-cyber-attack-pm-says-2022-09-07/ Reuters], [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62821757 BBC News], [https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2022-09-07/albania-cuts-iran-ties-orders-diplomats-to-go-after-cyber-attack-pm-says US News], [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/9/7/albania-cuts-diplomatic-ties-with-iran-over-cyberattack Al Jazeera], [https://news.yahoo.com/albania-cuts-diplomatic-ties-iran-160211521.html Yahoo! News/Fox News], [https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/albania-cuts-diplomatic-ties-iran-july-cyberattack-rcna46626 NBC News], [https://www.nzz.ch/international/nach-cyber-angriff-albanien-bricht-beziehungen-zu-iran-ab-ld.1701735 NZZ] |
|||
| |
| updated = yes |
||
| nominator = Malvoliox |
|||
| updated = |
|||
| updaters = |
|||
| nominator = Abcmaxx |
|||
| nom cmt = Sitting Minnesota state senator and former majority leader, hoping to expand the article a little/add electoral history and more details about political work, but also want to make sure we can clean up any issues with citations etc. that I didn’t catch. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 13:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
| sign = '''[[User:Malvoliox|<span style="color: darkgreen">~Malvoliox</span>]]''' ''([[User talk:Malvoliox|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malvoliox|contribs]])'' 14:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| nom cmt = It is very rare for countries to sever complete ties, even if they are at war it doesn't always happen. Before anyone raises that Albania is too small to matter, Albania is a NATO, COE, OSCE, and OIC member and EU official candidate. Also Albania has given refuge to the [[People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran|Iranian Mojahedin]] for a while now and despite its generally secular society, is still a Muslim-majority population. |
|||
*@[[User:Malvoliox|Malvoliox]], the better source needed tag should ideally be resolved. Otherwise, '''support'''. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 01:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
| creator = Abcmaxx |
|||
}} |
|||
::Replaced the bad source with a reliable recent one that details the case. '''[[User:Malvoliox|<span style="color: darkgreen">~Malvoliox</span>]]''' ''([[User talk:Malvoliox|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malvoliox|contribs]])'' 15:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment:''' As mentioned in nom, needs additional info about what she accomplished while in office. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 05:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Charles Dolan ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Charles Dolan <!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/charles-dolan-dead-media-pioneer-hbo-founder-1236095268/ The Hollywood Reporter]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = 240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = American billionaire businessman, founder of Cablevision and HBO.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389|240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389]] ([[User talk:240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389|talk]]) 07:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*''' |
* '''Support''', article is well-cited and I don't see any quality issues. [[User:Unknown-Tree|Unknown-Tree🌲?]] ([[User talk:Unknown-Tree|talk]]) 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''', article is long enough and well-sourced, with no apparent issues. Could use some spot verification. [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 01:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: According to the sources its due to Iran's recent cyberattack on Albania. The article needs updating, bear with me. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 14:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 01:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:This might belong on the article [[2022]], but I'm not sure about here. I'll say '''Weak Oppose''' unless this turns into a war and tensions further escalate. [[User:InvadingInvader|InvadingInvader]] ([[User talk:InvadingInvader|talk]]) 16:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' For argument's sake I made sure to consider "would we post this if this was two large countries", but the reality is this isn't horribly rare. There are about 200 countries on Earth with some change likely in that number over time. I think it's hard to justify posting the cutting of ties between two countries unless there is a lot of highly-publicized and impactful conflict that precedes it. [[User:DarkSide830|DarkSide830]] ([[User talk:DarkSide830|talk]]) 18:12, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: Err Albania is home to a disproportionately large number of Iranian dissidents and severing ties completely is very rare. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 20:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' – A big deal for little Albania, perhaps, but lacking in general significance or impact. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 19:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' While this is a fascinating tidbit of diplomatic news, I feel it's maybe more appropriate for DYK? It's also not really been referenced in major newspapers (at least not in the ones I typically consult). [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 20:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: Really? [https://www.irishtimes.com/world/us/2022/09/07/us-blames-iran-for-cyber-attack-on-albania/ Irish Times], [https://m.dw.com/en/albania-cuts-ties-with-iran-amid-cyberattack-allegations/a-63043309 DW], [https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/albania-cuts-diplomatic-ties-iran-july-cyberattack-89451296 ABC News]. The US has just officially responded to this as well. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 21:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::I stand corrected, then. I hadn't come across this on Der Spiegel and a few other German newspapers, The Guardian, the FT or Figaro, which are the ones I regularly check - if a news appears in one or more of them, it's usually a sign for me that it's been picked up and will be viewed by many readers in Europe. But maybe the news hasn't made its way into them yet, or I've overlooked it. I still feel it's not major news. [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 21:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::Give it a few hours. Albania in anglophone news is usually woefully underreported though in general. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 21:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Aye, I last heard this much about it in ''[[The Crepes of Wrath]]''. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] ([[User talk:InedibleHulk|talk]]) 22:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: "''... and the main export is furious political thought''" [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 23:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak Oppose''' Breaking diplomatic relations is indeed a fairly rare event and normally I would support. However the incident doesn't appear significant enough to justify its own article, which is a customary requirement for most noms at ITN, and the target article has only two sentences dedicated to the matter. Sorry, but that's not enough for ITN. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 21:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: {{ping|Ad Orientem}} this did cross my mind however my thought process was that this is a culmination of about 45 years worth of tensions, and any new article would probably not have all the background that's central to this. As for the length, this is breaking news essentially, please let it have a chance to expand. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 22:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] Perfectly open to reconsideration if the article can be adequately expanded. Ideally it should have its own page that begins with the cyber-attack and any relevant background. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' First of all, thanks for having added the additional sources. While for now I'd tend to keep my oppose !vote, I would suggest modifying the blurb to reflect that Albania unilaterally cut its diplomatic relations with Iran, accusing it of cyberattacks. [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 21:55, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: Albania did not have an embassy in Iran, while Iran had an embassy in Tirana. So ultimately it was never on equal footing. Also I don't know what Teheran's reaction is/will be. It's such a long, tense and complex relationship im not sure we should be making such an assertion just yet. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 22:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support'''. Severing of diplomatic ties is rare and significant, even if it involves smaller nations. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 22:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' Article quality is not up-to-snuff with regards to either comprehensiveness or referencing. There's large gaps in coverage; some sections consist of only 1-2 short sentences, and several statements appear to be entirely unverified at this point. Unless the article is significantly expanded and better referenced, it feels largely like a [[WP:COATRACK]] to hang this particular recent news item on. If this is fixed and corrected, my vote would be for full support. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 22:59, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:A sideshow in any case. -- [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 12:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. It is quite exceptional for two countries to sever relations with one another. We would certainly post this if this is two large countries, and relations of Iran (being a middle power) tends to actually be meaningful in some way. — <span style="background: linear-gradient(#990000,#660000)">[[User:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: white">Red-tailed hawk</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Red-tailed hawk|<span style="color: white">(nest)</span>]]</sub></span> 01:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' You can even argue that relatively stable relations being cut between a small country is definitely more relevant for ITN than already tense relations between large ones. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 08:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*I am leaning on support, but I would like to see a bit more expansion on the target article. The impact of this severance would be interesting and important to cover here, for example. Right now, I and other readers would be left with a lot of questions as to what this exactly means. ~[[User:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 08:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Update''' Expanded this quite a bit and used all the references so far mentioned. Dedicated section at [[Albania–Iran relations#Cyberattack and severed ties]] [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 19:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''' if approved, we'd have to post every time some countries severe ties with Taiwan or Israel. As for me, this is not ITN worthy, also not after the update.[[User:Paradise Chronicle|Paradise Chronicle]] ([[User talk:Paradise Chronicle|talk]]) 12:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:: Actually very few countries cut ties with either Taiwan or Israel as those that oppose their statehood never form diplomatic relations in the first place as doing so would legitimise their status which they oppose. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 23:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' I think a non-involved person should make a judgement on this. Not sure there is anything more to add. Quality issues have been fixed although it is a section not a stand-alone article in itself. Few opposes on notability, several supports.[[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 00:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Line 1,144: | Line 1,129: | ||
{{Reflist}}{{NOINDEX}} |
{{Reflist}}{{NOINDEX}} |
||
<noinclude>{{Main Page topics|state=collapsed}} |
<noinclude>{{Main Page topics|state=collapsed}} |
||
[[Category:Wikipedia In the news]] |
[[Category:Wikipedia In the news|Candidates]] |
||
[[Category:Main Page discussions]] |
[[Category:Main Page discussions]] |
||
[[Category:Current events]] |
[[Category:Current events]] |
Latest revision as of 16:57, 4 January 2025
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary[edit]
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps[edit]
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers[edit]
Voicing an opinion on an item[edit]Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...[edit]
Please do not...[edit]
Suggesting updates[edit]There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
[edit]Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives
Sections
[edit]This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.
January 4
[edit]
January 4, 2025
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
|
RD: Tomiko Itooka
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
- Created by ThadeusOfNazereth (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jake11223344 (talk · give credit) and INgIEroC (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Japanese supercentenarian. Date death announced. TJMSmith (talk) 15:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Comment Tomiko Itooka was the oldest living person as well at the time of her death, and we've generally posted these supercentenarian when they are at the top. Although, its not there yet. TheCorriynial (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2024–25 Ethiopian earthquakes
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Signs of a volcanic eruption appears in Awash Fentale in Afar Region. (Post)
News source(s): Al Alarabiya English, BBC News
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by AsteriodX (talk · give credit)
- Oppose three months of low-level activity damaging 100 houses. Not significant enough. Stephen 05:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Stephen. Little to no unusually major impact thus far. The Kip (contribs) 06:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Stephen, doesn't meet WP:ITNSIGNIF. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
January 3
[edit]
January 3, 2025
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
Sports
|
RD: Jeff Baena
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): People Magazine
Credits:
- Nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
- Created by Zujine (talk · give credit)
- Updated by 98.173.178.246 (talk · give credit), Simonthings18 (talk · give credit), DiaMali (talk · give credit) and Jolielover (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American screenwriter and film director. TJMSmith (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
2025 PDC World Darts Championship
[edit]Blurb: In darts, Luke Littler (pictured) wins the 2025 PDC World Darts Championship. (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by OZOO (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: ITNR sporting final. OZOO (t) (c) 22:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I've boldly bolded the target article since it was missing bolding per ITN norm. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Article is currently not ready since some parts
is still in future tense (Overview)and has some sourcing issues (Most subheadings under qualifications). 31.44.227.152 (talk) 23:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Article is currently not ready since some parts
- Aren't all tables under the "Schedule" section violations of MOS:COLHEAD? Would this hinder it being posted? Howard the Duck (talk) 23:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- MOS issues are generally a yellow "cleanup" tag issue, which doesn't prevent this from running, as only orange tags do. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Britt Allcroft
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Evening Standard
Credits:
- Nominated by Ollieisanerd (talk · give credit)
- Created by 66.185.84.206 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by TheStarSwitcher (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Date death announced. Ollieisanerd (talk • contribs) 16:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - Meets ITN RD requirements, appears ready. Jusdafax (talk) 13:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Where's the citation for two paragraphs in her career section? TNM101 (chat) 15:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) Devastating eruption located
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The site of the volcanic eruption (pictured) which caused blue suns and global famine has been identified. (Post)
News source(s): AAAS, Jerusalem Post
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Wtmitchell (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Oppose the blurb: Average reader would not understand what is this even about, at least in first few glances. Blue suns? Should be wikilinked, googling it gives weird things. Which global famine(s)? Too vague. If it is about some 1831 global climate catastrophe, does Wikipedia have an article about or related to it? Googling 'Zavaritski Caldera' on news tab currently only serves one news item by daily mail. It should first be reported by few major general news media outlets so that we may 'it is in news'. I don't say it is not interesting, but very confusing. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 11:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- The meteorological use of Blue sun doesn't have an article, but it probably could, there's enough material out there i.e. [1]. Meanwhile, the article is a stub and I don't see it significantly in the news at the moment. Black Kite (talk) 12:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I was working on getting this started but got an edit conflict. Will leave it for now but my impression is that there's lots of work to be done around this. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- The meteorological use of Blue sun doesn't have an article, but it probably could, there's enough material out there i.e. [1]. Meanwhile, the article is a stub and I don't see it significantly in the news at the moment. Black Kite (talk) 12:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose: the article is still a stub, and the blurb is not clear for non-initiated readers. Cambalachero (talk) 13:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Using the Little Ice Age article as a reference, there's multiple volcanic events that contributed to the changing climate from 1600-1900, and while discovering one of the sources is of scientific interest, this is not as key a breakthrough as the blurb seems to want to suggest. --Masem (t) 13:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose due to target article length/overall quality and a far too vague blurb for the average reader. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is a proposed (unconfirmed) interpretation of an event that happened in 1831. It's a mildly interesting result but has no major impact. I don't think this reaches the level of significance or broad interest that would merit an ITN blurb. In addition, the article is a stub with a single reference. We don't seem to have any article about the 1831 atmospheric phenomena, just a single bullet point in Little_Ice_Age_volcanism#1809–1831 - an indication that the event wasn't particularly influential or historically significant. Modest Genius talk 14:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Tariana Turia
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RNZ, The NZ Herald
Credits:
- Nominated by MtPenguinMonster (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Co-founder of Te Pāti Māori MtPenguinMonster (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support: Reference 32 is a dead raw link, but other than that I don't see any problems (and it's a minor detail that shouldn't stop the article) Cambalachero (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support looks good to me. A giant in NZ politics for sure. Ornithoptera (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Satis. Grimes2 (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
January 2
[edit]
January 2, 2025
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
(Posted) RD: Wilhelm Brückner (luthier)
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): MDR
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
- Created by Rundstef (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: German luthier in Erfurt. He worked until 90 in his workshop. Grimes2 (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support, I came to nominate, and perhaps update, but you did it all! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Article looks fine, nice work. Not sure if bibliography like this is needed, but that's not an issue here. Posting. --Tone 13:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - Well sourced, informative, ready to post. Jusdafax (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Rosita Missoni
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, NY Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Italian knitwear designer. With her husband Ottavio Missoni, she co-founded Italian luxury fashion house Missoni. Death reported 2 January. Thriley (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality Way too short to be posted to the Main Page. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose: Article is still a stub. It also merely says that she died, but not the causes of death or any reactions to it. Cambalachero (talk) 13:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Unless something has changed here recently, cause of death does not need to be mentioned for people who die of old age. RD does not require that degree of depth. Curbon7 (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- She was 93. RachelTensions (talk) 09:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Ján Zachara
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): "Vo veku 96 rokov zomrel bývalý slovenský boxer a olympijský víťaz Ján Zachara". Denník N (in Slovak). 2 January 2025. "Legendary boxer Ján Zachara passed away". rtvs.sk. Retrieved 2025-01-02.
Credits:
- Nominated by Di (they-them) (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: 1952 Olympic gold medalist, died on the same day as another 1952 gold medalist (Ágnes Keleti) Di (they-them) (talk) 16:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Current page size is 1427 B (243 words), generally still barely considered a WP:STUB.—Bagumba (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose: Article is very short, and does not mention the causes of death. Cambalachero (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- We don't post stubs. Schwede66 20:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Ágnes Keleti
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1] blikk portfolio hvg
Credits:
- Nominated by 94.44.118.57 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: The oldest living Olympian in history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.44.118.57 (talk) 07:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Second and and third citation above from Spworld2 (talk · contribs)'s duplicate nomination. His comment was
Ágnes Keleti has died, at the age of 104 , Hungarian Olympic champion, gymnast and Sportswoman
. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Comment Actually, she wasn't the oldest at the time of her death. Both Yvonne Chabot-Curtet and Iris Cummings were older then Ágnes Keleti. She was the oldest living champion, however. But its almost there, the article. TheCorriynial (talk) 10:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support, she's a notable Hungarian athlete who not only won 10 Olympic medals, but was also inducted into the International Jewish Sports Hall of Fame, the Hungarian Sports Hall of Fame, the International Women's Sports Hall of Fame, and the International Gymnastics Hall of Fame. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is a recent deaths nomination, and so as per the notice, only the article quality should be considered (every person with an article is eligible to be nominated). Joseph2302 (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Procedural oppose as per WP:DENY. The nominator is blocked for sockpuppetry/block evasion, so we shouldn't be supporting that by allowing this nomination of theirs. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- If they verifiably died, they qualify. It doesn't help readers in this case to DENY. Per the WP:EVASION policy:
This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert.
—Bagumba (talk) 18:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- If they verifiably died, they qualify. It doesn't help readers in this case to DENY. Per the WP:EVASION policy:
- Support Article is in quality to post. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support denying a non-offending article's RD eligibility just because it so happened to be initially nominated by a sockpuppet account is a bad precedent to set. It sends a message that if you really dislike someone and don't want them to be memorialized, the solution is for you to quickly create a sockpuppet account and push out an RD nom, so that the target article is never allowed on the main page. The article is well sourced and ready. FlipandFlopped ツ 20:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) Yoav Gallant resigns from Israel parliament
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Yoav Gallant, member of the Israel Parliament (pictured), resigns at the age of 66, after being fired in November. (Post)
News source(s): NDTV The Times Of Israel
Credits:
- Nominated by ArPerfectlyEdits (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Oppose Thanks for the information, but resigning from parliament is not ITN-worthy. He was already ITN with the fact, that the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant. Grimes2 (talk) 14:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Resigning after being fired is hardly the news bombshell he might have hoped for, even if he is an international criminal. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose first this doesn't meet WP:ITNSIGNIF. Also, this nomination was made by an editor with 29 edits, and so violates WP:ARBPIA (need to have 500 edits to edit this topic area). Joseph2302 (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't understand your last sentence. Why should an ITNC editor have 500 edits? Grimes2 (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's coming from the Arbcom decision on anythibg related to the Israel/Palestine conflict, which includes when these topics appear on ITN. — Masem (t) 18:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't understand your last sentence. Why should an ITNC editor have 500 edits? Grimes2 (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
January 1
[edit]
January 1, 2025
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: David Lodge
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Euronews
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:3531:2BB0:7F04:241F (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: British author and critic. 240F:7A:6253:1:3531:2BB0:7F04:241F (talk) 02:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Wayne Osmond
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS, YourErie, ABC
Credits:
- Nominated by TheAstorPastor (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
The AP (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2025 Trump International Hotel explosion
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: One person is killed and seven others are injured when a Tesla Cybertruck explodes (pictured) outside of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas in Paradise, Nevada, United States. (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times BBC ABC News
Credits:
- Nominated by Spworld2 (talk · give credit)
- Strong oppose This was deliberated before but it was taken down. Now a few hours on, we have more coverage than smoke being reported by The Mirror, but it still doesn't appear that important. Also, the article is at AfD, but that appears to be SNOW keep at the moment. Departure– (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– This is in favor of the AfD discussion, but the article should maintain its current status.
- This does not appear to be a normal explosion, there is international media coverage[2][3][4][5], one person was killed and 7 were injured, and there are reports that this is related to the 2025 New Orleans truck attack Spworld2 (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Whether it was intentional or not, a single death is not significant to post as a story, unless it was determined to be an act of terrorism (which doesn't seem to be the case at this point). --Masem (t) 05:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Masem Was it determined to be intentional or not? There was one death and more than 7 injuries, and this did not happen near a normal hotel. 2025 New Orleans truck attack still under investigation -
- FBI is trying to determine if the incident was an act of terrorism, CNN [6] reports Spworld2 (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting MINIMUMDEATHS > 1? Banedon (talk) 08:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - this nomination has already been closed once. This could easily be just an accident or a grandiose suicide. The only reason there may be more coverage than local is because of the (possibly conincidental) timing with the New Orleans attack; which would make it the same story if there is a link. Nfitz (talk) 05:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfit It seems that the previous nomination was terminated due to lack of quality. This does not seem to be a normal occurrence. Spworld2 (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- The previous nom was withdrawn by the nominator.—Bagumba (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose as per the previous one being withdrawn in the face of unanimous opposes. I share the sentiments of one of the original comments. A car fire? Some Tesla cars seem to have this issue. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 09:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- To be fair, mass shootings (and other kind of mass-murders) are objectively more common in the US than car fires. 51.154.145.205 (talk) 11:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- In 2021, 650 Americans died in motor vehicle fires and 48,000 by firearms, but most are suicides; only about 480 were in mass shootings. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- To be fair, mass shootings (and other kind of mass-murders) are objectively more common in the US than car fires. 51.154.145.205 (talk) 11:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose as a single item, merge with the New Orleans blurb IF a connection is officially confirmed. Johndavies837 (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose we do not report incidents where only one person died unless if it is the assassination of a notable person.
- Djprasadian (talk) 11:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, Vice President Elect Musk has "broken silence" to reassure us that Tesla Cybertrucks are perfectly safe. But he is still alive. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Vehicles explode (and cause injuries from said explosions) all the time, I don’t see what makes this particular instance so special. I may reconsider if concrete proof of the explosion being intentional comes out, but I doubt it. Hungry403 (talk) 13:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I also see that this nom was closed already, another reason for opposition Hungry403 (talk) 13:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: I'm pretty sure that Tesla Cybertrucks are not concrete-proof. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I also see that this nom was closed already, another reason for opposition Hungry403 (talk) 13:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wait It seems fairly clear that this wasn't a routine vehicle fire as the explosion was set up with fireworks and gas canisters. It seems conceivable that it's connected with the other truck terrorism incident and so we should await further investigation. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wait @Andrew is right. Some new articles are now calling this a possible act of terrorism. [7], [8]— Preceding unsigned comment added by IDB.S (talk • contribs) 17:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- The police are saying this is likely a Suicide. I'm horrified that people keep recreating the article and reopening the discussion, when this was pretty obviously a good likelihood at the time this discussion was reopened! Close this abortion now. Nfitz (talk) 19:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose This was already previously nominated, discussed, and quickly closed. --SpectralIon (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I was rejected from nominating it, however now that it was a terrorist attack and one person died, it only makes sense for it to be nominated. Two terrorist attacks in one day, sad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk • contribs) 20:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- There's no indication, User:SimpleSubCubicGraph, that this was a suicide. Why do you think this wasn't a suicide? Nfitz (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz well I've heard from some news sources that it is a terrorist attack. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you have any references, User:SimpleSubCubicGraph? I haven't seen any since they declared that they believe it's a suicide. Nfitz (talk) 20:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz well I've heard from some news sources that it is a terrorist attack. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- There's no indication, User:SimpleSubCubicGraph, that this was a suicide. Why do you think this wasn't a suicide? Nfitz (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support my alt blurb. ArionStar (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose (again) that altblurb. These attacks are not related in method or scope (active attack with 10+ deaths vs. a suicide with no additional deaths). Also, while most know where New Orleans is, Paradise in English internationally overwhelmingly is not used to refer to the Nevada location. Departure– (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't live in the US and I'm not familiar with American cities. ArionStar (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Our article Trump International Hotel Las Vegas says it's in Paradise, not Las Vegas. Our blurbs shouldn't be factually wrong. Though why anyone wants to ITN a suicide I don't know. That's highly concerning. Nfitz (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Trying to think of it as an explosion rather than a suicide might alleviate some of that concern. People nominate exploding meteors, exploding pipelines, exploding all kinds of stuff. Humans are often involved, but they're not the basis, like in pure death cases. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose (again) that altblurb. These attacks are not related in method or scope (active attack with 10+ deaths vs. a suicide with no additional deaths). Also, while most know where New Orleans is, Paradise in English internationally overwhelmingly is not used to refer to the Nevada location. Departure– (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The authorities have officially announced that this incident was not linked to the New Orleans incident. With that in mind, this is not nearly important enough for the main page. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm just...appalled with this discussion, between the last nom and this one. I do agree with the consensus that this is a single isolated incident and not really ITN worthy, I really think the civility was lost some time ago with this one. Just a recommendation everyone - let's chill out a bit. DarkSide830 (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's free forum open to divergent opinions. The only civility lost was due to the tragedies. ArionStar (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- When divergent opinions go to reopening closed debatess and glorifying suicide, then that's a step too far. The article is a huge violation of MOS:SUICIDE. Nfitz (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- The original nomination was withdrawn, not closed otherwise. Reporting by major reliable sources has improved since then so reopening this wasn't quite as big of a problem as that, in my opinion. Departure– (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- When divergent opinions go to reopening closed debatess and glorifying suicide, then that's a step too far. The article is a huge violation of MOS:SUICIDE. Nfitz (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's free forum open to divergent opinions. The only civility lost was due to the tragedies. ArionStar (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - This is now being reported as an isolated incident. As no-one but the victim/perpetrator died, I don't think it comes anywhere near the usual threshold for ITN, and I'm rather suprised it's still being debated. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose -- this really ought to be closed; clearly consensus won't develop to post this. --RockstoneSend me a message! 05:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) Schengen Area expansion
[edit]Blurb: Romania and Bulgaria join the Schengen Area, the European passport-free zone. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Romania and Bulgaria join the Schengen Area and lift land border checks.
Alternative blurb II: Romania and Bulgaria both become full members of the Schengen Area.
Alternative blurb III: Romania and Bulgaria both become full members of the Schengen Area by removing land border checks, seven months after their initial admission.
News source(s): CNN, Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by UCinternational (talk · give credit)
- Updated by WikiContributor0830 (talk · give credit)
- Support, I would argue that any changes to the composition of the Schengen Area are inherently relevant as the largest area with free movement in the world, and for years it has been a major topic of discussion here in the European Union that Romania and Bulgaria were the last EU members to not have been admitted (excl. Ireland who have an opt-out) because of a veto from Austria in the Council of the European Union. So it was very significant when the vote finally passed last month in the Justice and Home Affairs Council.
- However, that wording is probably not ideal—in a legal sense, Romania and Bulgaria joined the Schengen Area on 31 March 2024 when border controls were lifted for air and sea travel. The news are that land border checks have also just been lifted, granting the countries full participation on the same level as all other 27 member states.
- So I would propose re-phrasing the blurb to something like Romania and Bulgaria become full members of the Schengen Area, with land border checks lifted on 1 January 2025.
- BochiBochiGalaxy (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support, but agree with BochiBochiGalaxy, so also added altblurb 1. Yo.dazo (talk) 10:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability This is a major change in international policy. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support ALT1 as a major change in policy that is in the news, so meets WP:ITNSIGNIF. And target article has enough information about this event to pass WP:ITNQUALITY. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose This item is misleading because, currently, many major EU nations are actually operating border controls – Austria, Denmark, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, etc. – see EU Commission. Schengen is effectively in abeyance and the article/blurb do not explain this. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - Positive news, and any complaints about the article or story being misleading can be addressed in the article itself. Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - important moment for those countries. Very notable event. - Eugen Simion 14 (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Eugen. ArionStar (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - 2 nations joining the Schengen isn't that exciting. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Major development. @SimpleSubCubicGraph: ITN articles do not have to be "exciting", they simply must be important. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support altblurb2 as nominator. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Both are major European countries with relatively large populations. I like the original blurb the most, but I'm fine with any of them. This is certainly a development worthy for ITN. --SpectralIon (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- With the edits to the blurbs, I now prefer Altblurb 1 to the others. SpectralIon (talk) 06:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support alt2 - Significant development in international relations. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- NB: Since I made the above post, the blurbs have been edited by another user to be more verbose than they were previously. I liked the conciseness of alt2, which is why I voted for it. The current alt2 is not what I voted for; I would support the original blurb in preference to it. GenevieveDEon (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GenevieveDEon: I've restored altblurb2 and moved the appended altblurb2 to a new altblurb since it was significantly appended by another editor without my knowledge. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 02:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- NB: Since I made the above post, the blurbs have been edited by another user to be more verbose than they were previously. I liked the conciseness of alt2, which is why I voted for it. The current alt2 is not what I voted for; I would support the original blurb in preference to it. GenevieveDEon (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Posted ALT2. Schwede66 07:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: John B. O'Reilly Jr.
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [9]
Credits:
- Nominated by History6042 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Moeqas (talk · give credit) and Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: 6th mayor of Dearborn, Michigan. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- In its current form, the article isn't ready. Date and place of birth are unreferenced. There is absolutely nothing about his early life, education, or work history. Schwede66 19:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Chad Morgan
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-01-02/chad-morgan-australian-country-music-singer-dies/104778248
Credits:
- Nominated by HiLo48 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Australian comedy country music performer known as "The Sheik of Scrubby Creek". HiLo48 (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
(Ready) 2025 Cetinje shootings
[edit]Blurb: Thirteen people including the perpetrator are killed and four others are injured in spree shootings in Cetinje, Montenegro. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Thirteen are killed in spree shootings in Cetinje, Montenegro. The shootings are the deadliest in Montenegro since 1944 during Nazi occupation.
News source(s): [10]
Credits:
- Nominated by SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk · give credit)
- Support on notability, oppose on quality Quite similar in scope as the 2022 Cetinje shooting, also taking place in Cetinje. Removed mention of terrorism in the blurb as it's not in the source beyond the involvement of counter-terrorist government agencies. The second shooting targeted the restaurant owner's family. Departure– (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– Changed it once more to deadliest shooting in Montenegro since 1944. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's almost certainly not relevant. "Deadliest since X" isn't needed in a blurb. Departure– (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– Please clarify if I am wrong but doesn't blurb mean short description? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Blurbs are almost always a single sentence and typically don't contain context in the blurb. For instance, we wouldn't have the second sentence read "Shootings in Montenegro are rare due to strict gun laws" either - that can be implied from the source or the article. Departure– (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I turned SSCG's changes into an altblurb. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– Please clarify if I am wrong but doesn't blurb mean short description? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's almost certainly not relevant. "Deadliest since X" isn't needed in a blurb. Departure– (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality. Article is all of eight sentences. Notability is unclear. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem how is a terrorist attack that has killed as many people as the New Orleans truck attack not notable? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The article does not indicate that this is a terrorist incident. If that is established I would likely support on the merits, though article quality does not meet the customary standards for ITN as of this comment. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem its still people dying... SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I am not questioning the basic notability of the subject for inclusion in the encyclopedia. But we have a higher bar for blurbs at ITN. All of which said, the immediate problem is article quality. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem its still people dying... SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The article does not indicate that this is a terrorist incident. If that is established I would likely support on the merits, though article quality does not meet the customary standards for ITN as of this comment. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem how is a terrorist attack that has killed as many people as the New Orleans truck attack not notable? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability, oppose on quality. This is the worst shooting in the country since World War II, so it definitely warrants inclusion. However, the article is way too short for the main page. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: I oppose the altblurb, since those facts may not be correct. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Oppose- there's no mention in the article about these being the largest shootings since WWII. Perhaps because 11 died in the same location less than 30 months ago - 2022 Cetinje shooting (which was ITN). Also there were higher death counts for sprees murdering Albanians during the 1990s Yugoslav wars. This nomination is WP:OR. Nfitz (talk)Oppose per Nfitz. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 23:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Changed to Support on notability due to increased death count. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 18:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)- Support original blurb on notability, wait on quality. This is definitely notable with 10 dead, but the article is a very short stub. I also oppose the alternative blurb per Nfitz. --SpectralIon (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I now fully Support the original blurb seeing as the article quality has improved and the casualty count has risen. SpectralIon (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
OpposeWeak Oppose - This doesn't seem terrorism related at all, and is rather a crazy person with a gun angry at the world after perceived slights. --RockstoneSend me a message! 00:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) (Note: with the updated death count, I only weakly oppose posting-- RockstoneSend me a message! 22:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC))- @SpectralIon he killed as many people as the new orleans truck attack, what makes this not in the news? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I supported this for ITN, did you mean to ping Rockstone? SpectralIon (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon Yes, I am sorry. @Rockstone35 read above please SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @User:SimpleSubCubicGraph we typically don't post things that are notable only for the number of deaths without something more. We wouldn't have posted a mass shooting that killed 10 people in the US, for example. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 03:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockstone35 so 10 people dying mean nothing to you? What if you were a family member of those people? Wouldnt you want everyone to hear what that person did? You cant be apathetic to these people just because they dont affect you. You need to understand how that not only affected the family and friends of the 10 but the entire city and nation of Montenegro. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 04:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Opposing this doesn't mean I don't condemn the attacks or mourn the lives lost. Please don't set up a strawman. Of course I feel awful for the victims, as anyone would. But ITN isn't a newsticker. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 16:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SimpleSubCubicGraph, please read WP:RGW. The Kip (contribs) 19:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockstone35 so 10 people dying mean nothing to you? What if you were a family member of those people? Wouldnt you want everyone to hear what that person did? You cant be apathetic to these people just because they dont affect you. You need to understand how that not only affected the family and friends of the 10 but the entire city and nation of Montenegro. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 04:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @User:SimpleSubCubicGraph we typically don't post things that are notable only for the number of deaths without something more. We wouldn't have posted a mass shooting that killed 10 people in the US, for example. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 03:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon Yes, I am sorry. @Rockstone35 read above please SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I supported this for ITN, did you mean to ping Rockstone? SpectralIon (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon he killed as many people as the new orleans truck attack, what makes this not in the news? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Ad Orientem and Nfitz. Beyond deaths, special notability seems shaky. The Kip (contribs) 03:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability, oppose on quality. Wait until the article is not a stub to post it. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support The deadliest shooting since World War II is notable itsslf. Article looks better now.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is no indication this this is the deadliest shooting since "Workd War II (sic)". And this isn't stated in the article. Nfitz (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- The government of Montenegro declared three days of mourning, which is a sign that this is a serious incident on national level. Furthermore, there's no reason why lives of Americans should be valued more than lives of Montenegrins as we already have a similar incident in New Orleans posted on the main page. After careful examination, there's indication that the opposition to this nomination on significance comes from editors who regularly support shootings in the US and complain about anti-American bias when they don’t succeed.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please answer the question. I'm not sure what the USA has to do with this. The nomination is seriously flawed - that's the issue I have. Nfitz (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz: You state that something isn’t the case without providing any evidence that proves the contrary. The 2022 Cetinje shooting you’re referring to had 11 deaths, which is clearly less than 13 deaths in this one. Moreover, there were no murders of Albanians in Montenegro during the 1990s. Montenegro was part of Yugoslavia whose authorities committed murders in Kosovo. You’re welcome to provide additional evidence if you don’t agree with it. There are reliable sources reporting this as ‘the greatest massacre’ in the history of Montenegro (see this as an example), so you need to better elaborate your view that it’s not the case. After all, we typically don’t include such lines in the blurbs we post, so this is a relatively minor issue considering how the story is unfolding (there are three days of mourning, and a country-wide gun ban was proposed).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you are say that there were no murders of Albanians (contrary to our own Encyclopaedia), I have concerns. My point here is that the article nowhere mentions that this is the deadliest shooting since Work War II, itsslf (sic). Surely, User:Kiril Simeonovski, looking at the article makes that clear (at least at the time that posted). The deaths are indeed now higher than the other recent shooting in this town; I don't see the relevance to my comment. Nfitz (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz: I think you should learn some geography and history before participating in such discussions with claims that what you don’t like is flawed (note first that Montenegro and Albania are different countries that haven’t been part of the same political entity over the past 100 years).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, of Albanians. There's no reason to be rude, and for you to violate one of Wikipedia's most basic principles, just because I've correctly pointed out that the article didn't mention that it was the biggest shooting since World War II. Nfitz (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not rude, just honest, and I wasn't bothered by your repeated sarcasm ("Workd War II (sic)"). Fair enough. Let's leave some room for others in this discussion.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, of Albanians. There's no reason to be rude, and for you to violate one of Wikipedia's most basic principles, just because I've correctly pointed out that the article didn't mention that it was the biggest shooting since World War II. Nfitz (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz: I think you should learn some geography and history before participating in such discussions with claims that what you don’t like is flawed (note first that Montenegro and Albania are different countries that haven’t been part of the same political entity over the past 100 years).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- If you are say that there were no murders of Albanians (contrary to our own Encyclopaedia), I have concerns. My point here is that the article nowhere mentions that this is the deadliest shooting since Work War II, itsslf (sic). Surely, User:Kiril Simeonovski, looking at the article makes that clear (at least at the time that posted). The deaths are indeed now higher than the other recent shooting in this town; I don't see the relevance to my comment. Nfitz (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz: You state that something isn’t the case without providing any evidence that proves the contrary. The 2022 Cetinje shooting you’re referring to had 11 deaths, which is clearly less than 13 deaths in this one. Moreover, there were no murders of Albanians in Montenegro during the 1990s. Montenegro was part of Yugoslavia whose authorities committed murders in Kosovo. You’re welcome to provide additional evidence if you don’t agree with it. There are reliable sources reporting this as ‘the greatest massacre’ in the history of Montenegro (see this as an example), so you need to better elaborate your view that it’s not the case. After all, we typically don’t include such lines in the blurbs we post, so this is a relatively minor issue considering how the story is unfolding (there are three days of mourning, and a country-wide gun ban was proposed).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think the situation in New Orleans is significantly different than the situation in Montenegro. Namely, the one in New Orleans is a terrorist attack, while this is a domestic violence incident that became a spree shooting. Would you support posting a similar shooting that happened in the US? Personally, I would not. Also, please don't cast aspersions, I do not appreciate your insinuations. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 22:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockstone35: Is there a specific Wikipedia policy that terrorist attacks should be assigned higher significance in ITN nominations? Innocent people died in both incidents, so the motives shouldn’t matter.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski: there isn't a specific policy that we shouldn't include mass shootings in countries where they're common, and yet that's consistently what happens, so I don't know what your point is. If the motive doesn't matter, then neither should how often it happens or where. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 00:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- My point is that you cannot dismiss a shooting if it’s not a terrorist attack as we don’t have such policy. There are other indicators of notability, such as public response and policies. If there are days of mourning and proposals for country-wide gun ban, then it’s clear that this is a serious incident that affects the whole society.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- The main reason I opposed posting was because these types of shootings are routinely not posted if they happen in the US, despite the fact that they had the same number of deaths. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 15:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- My point is that you cannot dismiss a shooting if it’s not a terrorist attack as we don’t have such policy. There are other indicators of notability, such as public response and policies. If there are days of mourning and proposals for country-wide gun ban, then it’s clear that this is a serious incident that affects the whole society.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski: there isn't a specific policy that we shouldn't include mass shootings in countries where they're common, and yet that's consistently what happens, so I don't know what your point is. If the motive doesn't matter, then neither should how often it happens or where. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 00:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockstone35: Is there a specific Wikipedia policy that terrorist attacks should be assigned higher significance in ITN nominations? Innocent people died in both incidents, so the motives shouldn’t matter.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please answer the question. I'm not sure what the USA has to do with this. The nomination is seriously flawed - that's the issue I have. Nfitz (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- The government of Montenegro declared three days of mourning, which is a sign that this is a serious incident on national level. Furthermore, there's no reason why lives of Americans should be valued more than lives of Montenegrins as we already have a similar incident in New Orleans posted on the main page. After careful examination, there's indication that the opposition to this nomination on significance comes from editors who regularly support shootings in the US and complain about anti-American bias when they don’t succeed.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:46, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is no indication this this is the deadliest shooting since "Workd War II (sic)". And this isn't stated in the article. Nfitz (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on Quality. Significance seems to be there, but as many of noted, the article is fairly short. DarkSide830 (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - While the article would still benefit from expansion, it's just about sufficient. Despite the fact that Cetinje has had two of them in four years, shootings of this kind are generally very rare in Europe, and this is clearly more than noteworthy. I am not impressed by arguments attempting to differentiate the New Orleans killings from these by applying the politicised label of 'terrorism'; in a murder on this scale, the puported reason for the killings should not generally be a deciding factor in whether to post. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - As noted above, the article is short and could benefit from more people writing to expand it, but it is more than enough to understand the event. Regardless of whether Cetinje was unlucky enough to have two modern shootings, these shootings are still extraordinarily rare in Europe. I will also note that I do not understand why so many people have tried to argue on the semantics of the word terrorism when twelve people have died, and that to most of the world this and the New Orleans terrorist attack have equal relevance – I think there is very clear U.S.-centrism at display in this discussion. BochiBochiGalaxy (talk) 05:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't Americentricism, please don't cast aspersions. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 15:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability; weak support on quality per GenevieveDEon and BochiBochiGalaxy. The article could and should be further expanded, but I think it conveys the basics of what happened sufficiently with some recent additions by editors. It is a landmark mass casualty event for a country that has caused a day of national mourning. The ripple effects of the shooting are also spurring a nationwide conversation about banning firearms. The call for gun reform are in turn attracting global news coverage, e.g. from the Washington Post to the Toronto Star. Opposing votes have mentioned the attack being motivated by mental health or family issues, but I point out these were also motivations of the Sandy Hook or Aurora shooters in the USA, attacks which had a lasting impact and which we did post without question. A non-terror motive does not negate that it is an impactful event, with casualties, that is leading to global media coverage. FlipandFlopped ツ 18:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support - I'm changing my vote as the death toll has increased and I'm sold on the arguments of how rare such events are in Europe compared to other areas. Support blurb - I'm concerned the alt-blurb about WW2 is neither mentioned in the article, nor necessarily correct. Nfitz (talk) 20:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do we have a consensus now? SpectralIon (talk) 20:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Even though I opposed posting... I think we do have consensus. --RockstoneSend me a message! 03:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockstone35 What is the consesus? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SimpleSubCubicGraph that it ought to be posted. --RockstoneSend me a message! 04:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Then we need someone to ping an admin. SpectralIon (talk) 04:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon can you please ping an admin SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the rules are regarding that so I'm not gonna risk it. You should mark this nom as (Ready) though SpectralIon (talk) 05:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon can you please ping an admin SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockstone35 What is the consesus? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Even though I opposed posting... I think we do have consensus. --RockstoneSend me a message! 03:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do we have a consensus now? SpectralIon (talk) 20:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support original blurb or a variation thereof. I'm not sure the comparison to World War II makes a lot of sense even were it factually accurate - certainly what larger massacres occurred in 1944 were of another nature than this one. This is bad enough on its own. Khuft (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) 2025 New Orleans truck attack
[edit]Blurb: 11 people are killed and 36 others are injured in a vehicle-ramming and shooting attack in New Orleans, Louisiana (street pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: Eleven people are killed and thirty-six others are injured in a vehicle-ramming and shooting attack in New Orleans, Louisiana (intersection pictured).
News source(s): [11][12][13]
Credits:
- Nominated by Personisinsterest (talk · give credit)
Wait on quality,support on notability. Going through some international news websites, this is the very top story on most of them and one of the top on all of them.I think a bit more information is needed in the article, but it's a matter of time as new information comes in.Heythereimaguy (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)- I, along with other users, have edited the article as more information has surfaced to the point where I believe that the article is of high enough quality. Support. Heythereimaguy (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment We typically do not post shootings in the US due to their frequency, but I will note that the fact that they found improvised explosives in the truck and the suspect was wearing armored gear suggests this is more than a run of the mill shooting, very likely premeditated. Should at least wait until some more info on the motive (if they can figure it out, the driver was killed) --Masem (t) 14:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, this was more a vehicle attack than a shooting. Heythereimaguy (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The article is called "car attack" (actually now "truck attack"), so it is puzzling why one would ignore that central aspect when assessing the article's notability. Einsof (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wait on quality and support without image for notability, however, the current image of just the street is, in my opinion, irrelevant. We don't need an image for every blurb. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Use Terrorist attack instead of 'Car attack' if confirmed. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support quality is ok now. ArionStar (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support: This is the worst terrorist attack on American soil in years. BOTTO (T•C) 15:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Personisinsterest: Would you be able to change the link in your nomination to 2025 New Orleans truck attack? The article has been renamed since you nominated it. BOTTO (T•C) 17:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Got it! Personisinsterest (talk) 18:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Personisinsterest: Would you be able to change the link in your nomination to 2025 New Orleans truck attack? The article has been renamed since you nominated it. BOTTO (T•C) 17:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Its the new year and a terrorist attack happened. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Quality is fine given the amount of publicly available information. Notable based on high number of casualties for a vehicle-ramming attack. Einsof (talk) 17:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Similar to the 2024 Magdeburg car attack that was posted at couple weeks earlier. Even more dead though and with an ISIS flag, bombs and guns, this is not run-of-the-mill in any way. Quality is good considering the amount of info available at the moment. --TorsodogTalk 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 18:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2025 Trump Tower fire
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: A cybertruck catches on fire near the Trump Tower with casulaties still unknown. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-trump-tower-explosion-horror-34403879]
Credits:
- Nominated by SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk · give credit)
- Oppose and topic ban User:SimpleSubCubicGraph from ITN. A car fire? And the sole source in the nomination is from a somewhat questionable tabloid list as WP:MREL. Nfitz (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose WP:NTRUMP - no casualties confirmed or reported yet, damage unclear but doesn't appear much, reporting is coming from inside the tower implying most inside are more or less safe but they're saying that the fire wasn't even at the tower. The "big story" is literal reporting on smoke via The Mirror. Departure– (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wow Great to see some serious sources wading in: GB News, Daily Star, and Wiki's Favourite. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz I assumed it was a terrorist attack given that another one happened in New Orleans just a few hours ago. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
December 31
[edit]
December 31, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Buddy MacKay
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:
- Nominated by Davey2116 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American politician, governor of Florida for three weeks (1998–99), dies at age 91. Davey2116 (talk) 04:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Fraser Stoddart
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Twente University
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
- Created by V8rik (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Nobel Prize laureate in chemistry in the fields supramolecular chemistry and nanotechnology. Grimes2 (talk) 13:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Jocelyn Wildenstein
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): People
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Swiss socialite best known for her extensive cosmetic surgery. 240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26 (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Arnold Rüütel
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [14]
Credits:
- Nominated by 2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: 3rd President of Estonia from 2001–2006. 2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD (talk) 04:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not Ready Multiple CN tags --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Several instances in the article of sourcing issues which need to be fixed. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 14:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Angelo Amato
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [15]
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by History6042 (talk · give credit)
- Created by LCahill (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Italian cardinal who died yesterday. History6042😊 (Contact me) 04:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Almost there One CN tag. But it's an entire list of his publications. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Added ISBNs Grimes2 (talk) 04:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support article now seems cited. FlipandFlopped ツ 18:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Johnnie Walker
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Ollieisanerd (talk · give credit)
- Created by R. fiend (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Cameron Scott (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: English disc jockey. Ollieisanerd (talk • contribs) 16:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support He seems to be quite popular as a DJ, including winning many awards. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Curbon7 (talk) 12:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: currently 18 {cn} tags. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready per Martinevans123. Referencing is not up to scratch. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2024 United States Treasury Hack
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The Chinese Communist Party hacks into the United States Treasury, stealing valuable data (Post)
Alternative blurb: The United States Department of the Treasury states that it was hacked by a Chinese intelligence agency.
News source(s): (Reuters)
Credits:
- Nominated by SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk · give credit)
- Oppose First, that blurb is extremely misleading on two angles: Chinese hackers are suspected, but there's not yet any connection to the CCP. Second, the data took was "unclassified documents", which means it is unlikely to be "valuable" data from the Treasure department. As such, this is nowhere close to a major scandle, they just had to report it after reporting it to Congress. At this point, its not a significant incident. --Masem (t) 01:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Masem To your first point, yes that is true, a "suspicion" but 99% likely CCP hackers. Secondly, unclassified does not mean publicly available data, there are unclassified documents in the military, but that does not mean you can go around looking at it. Also the extent of the hack is still unreported. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 01:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nonetheless I will still leave it up to garner a community census. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 01:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Which is why at this point, how significant this is is unknown, particularly compared to the phone network hacks earlier this previous month. As this happened earlier this month and only being reported on now, we should wait until we see if there's a serious diplomatic issue that develops. Masem (t) 01:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Oh no, my data! Seriously though, per above this isn't a major or important development yet. Much larger cyberattacks have happened since, such as National Public Data where actual valuable information was confirmed to be leaked, and that wasn't posted because we couldn't muster enough editors to get that up to quality. Tell me, what was stolen exactly? I'll reconsider if this gets more coverage. I'd give weak support on quality here. Departure– (talk) 04:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Departure– you know the Treasury will not leak what was stolen, but it was likely the programs that monitor and communicate with funding. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the blurb, it is laughably breaking many WPian notions. Nothing to say on posting another blurb. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 08:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not WP:BITE. Gotitbro (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it in a devious way, but that in the process of forming a blurb, it produced something which is a bit humorous, as well as not fit few Wiki guidelines. I hope SimpleSubCubicGraph didn't get it the wrong way. It is a good faith nom anyway. --ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 11:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor I'm sorry, I won't make a new post anymore if thats what you want SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @SimpleSubCubicGraph You got me, I meant you to not post anything ever again, stop editing and take a pretty much sanyasa from this wiki world of illusions.[FBDB] --ExclusiveEditor(talk) 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor I can not tell if that is humor or not, and yes I am being serious. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @SimpleSubCubicGraph You got me, I meant you to not post anything ever again, stop editing and take a pretty much sanyasa from this wiki world of illusions.[FBDB] --ExclusiveEditor(talk) 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not WP:BITE. Gotitbro (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just the latest in Chinese intelligence activity abroad (Chinese espionage in the United States, Chinese espionage in California) and Chinese information operations and information warfare. 2024 United States telecommunications hack was another one of these along with the Chinese interference in the 2024 United States elections; this isn't as unique of a story as it would initially seem. If things escalate we can re-consider. Gotitbro (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Masem. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Insignificant Setarip (talk) 16:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Masem. -- KTC (talk) 23:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose and WP:WHACK! User:SimpleSubCubicGraph for a horrid nomination. Nfitz (talk) 23:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per everybody. --SpectralIon (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per further thought. After rethinking about the grand scope of the article, I have changed my opinion on the matter and no longer think it is newsworthy enough to end up on the front page. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 5:04:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
December 30
[edit]
December 30, 2024
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
RD: Loretta Di Franco
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Oberon's Grove
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Created by 4meter4 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Soprano who performed more than 900 times at the Metropolitan Opera, many small roles and some lead roles. The article was mostly there, but the referencing not quite. The earliest obit is from 30 December, - we don't know (yet) when she died. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Jorge Lanata
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Cambalachero (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Journalist from Argentina. It too me a pair of days to post this, as the article was mostly unreferenced and had to basically use WP:TNT. I hope that it is ready for RD status. Cambalachero (talk) 02:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Michael Newberry
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RTE, BBC
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by The C of E (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: English-born Northern Irish footballer The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 10:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Quality looks good to me. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Jamshid bin Abdullah
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Atheer.om
Credits:
- Nominated by Mr. Lechkar (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Last sultan of Zanzibar, claimant to the defunct throne since the monarchy was overthrown in 1964. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good, though it's also pretty short. Yo.dazo (talk) 14:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- There's nothing on his early life and I conclude that it’s not fit for posting in its current state. Schwede66 16:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose He is insignificant. Although he may be the heir, that is about the peak of his fame. Zanzibar is apart of Tanzania now and even then was a state that nobody cared about, both strategically and relevance. This would not be good for In the news but rather Did you know and even then, its very hard if that should appear on that page. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- FYI, for RD we normally only oppose due to the quality of the article. If it has an article, the subject is notable enough to appear in RD. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Schwede66. Article needs a lot more info such as about early life, which could be expanded a bit. Plus, there's some cn tags. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Linda Lavin
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): (ABC)
Credits:
- Nominated by QalasQalas (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: great loss actress and she deserves --QalasQalas 23:38, 2024 December 30 (UTC)
- Comment: Article looks fine except the whole filmography is unsourced. RachelTensions (talk) 01:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Linda_Lavin#Acting_credits has remained largely unsourced. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Ethiopian Truck Crash
[edit]Blurb: Ethiopian truck crash kills 71 people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: 71 people die in an Ethiopian truck crash
Alternative blurb II: A truck falls off a bridge over the Ganale Doria River in Bona Zuria, Sidama Region, Ethiopia, killing 71 people and injuring 4 others.
News source(s): [16]
Credits:
- Nominated by Alexgmail2000 (talk · give credit)
- Oppose Article is a stub. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 12:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is no longer a stub, I believe. Ca talk to me! 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I still believe it is a stub / article needs expansion. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Someone with local sources to help us? ArionStar (talk) 17:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I still believe it is a stub / article needs expansion. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is no longer a stub, I believe. Ca talk to me! 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article is decent and significant as the Minas Gerais road crash. The year 2024 is ending very badly. ArionStar (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is "disaster" the right word for the article name? the sources seem to leave it as "accident" even with a toll that high? --Masem (t) 13:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Like Madan Ashrit Highway disaster and Westdene dam disaster. ArionStar (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- The move from truck crash to this new title was not discussed and should be reverted. "Try to avoid the words disaster, tragedy and crisis because this characterization is too subjective. It is preferable to use specific event names, such as collision, collapse, explosion, outbreak, pandemic, sinking, oil spill, and the like."
- Also Oppose on quality and sourcing.
- Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I moved the article. Ca talk to me! 16:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The article significant because of many sources reported it numerous times. AsteriodX (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notabilty, Wait on quality, hopefully the article will improve eventually. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 17:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support What is it with disasters this week? Setarip (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Setarip what is with the entire year, so many incidents happening. its crazy, espically the latter half SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh and Support SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Setarip what is with the entire year, so many incidents happening. its crazy, espically the latter half SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on article quality WP:STUB QalasQalas (talk) 20:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for article quality then support altblurb2 without picture as the current image is too low quality. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 22:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose bus plunge This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 22:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Truck" plunge. ArionStar (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is actually a very good point about how news media, now with 24/7 operations, needs news to cover, and why as an encyclopedia we should be wary of giving attention to every single accident that gets reported. — Masem (t) 01:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait until article quality improves, then Support Altblurb 2 due to the high number of casualties. P.S. is going into edit source the correct way to reply to an ITN nom? This is my first time and I couldn't find info about it. --SpectralIon (talk) 00:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability once the article is no longer a stub. high number of casualties, significant coverage. FlipandFlopped ツ 01:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Article is a stub and we don’t post those. Schwede66 16:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Little encyclopedic value to our readers. Tradediatalk 23:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm trying to do something but no updates yet. ArionStar (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- support just posted N'orleans with a dozen dead. Only logical.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- We can make an exception here. It's so tragical. ArionStar (talk) 02:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support in principle - This is a truly unusually high number of fatalities for a road accident. I'm not at all sympathetic to the terse deployment of 'bus plunge' as a 'reason' to oppose this nomination. It's an overused cliche used to dismiss genuinely significant stories from less-reported countries, simply because they feature a particular class of road accident. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Schwede66: we have a consensus here. ArionStar (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nah, at 1106 B (172 words) "readable prose size", that is most certainly still a stub. And we don't post stubs. Schwede66 04:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- So, we have a consensus with a stub. Can anyone help us to expand it? ArionStar (talk) 12:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Though it was a truck that plunged this time, not a bus, I can't see how that small cosmetic difference turns the whole underlying story (as reported) into something fundamentally expandable. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:45, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- So, we have a consensus with a stub. Can anyone help us to expand it? ArionStar (talk) 12:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nah, at 1106 B (172 words) "readable prose size", that is most certainly still a stub. And we don't post stubs. Schwede66 04:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Schwede66: we have a consensus here. ArionStar (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality but support on notability Horrifying accident, but the article's still a stub. The Kip (contribs) 02:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
December 29
[edit]
December 29, 2024
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
|
(REVIEWERS NEEDED) RD: Lenny Randle
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bagumba (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Has been called baseball’s version of the “most interesting man in the world" —Bagumba (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
(REVIEWERS NEEDED) RD: Dada Masilo
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): SABC
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Internationally acclaimed South African dancer and choreographer, who transformed classical ballets into stories about today's characters, in a fusion with contemporary dance and African dancing. The article was stubbish, with lost references. There's still room for more detail, but I'm looking at the next two already. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
2024 Estlink 2 incident
[edit]Note that I've moved the item to 29 Dec, the date of the ship's transfer to Porvoo (see ALT2), as otherwise, this would be stale by now. Schwede66 18:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Striking the stale original (25 Dec) blurb.—Bagumba (talk) 10:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Blurb:
Alternative blurb: Finnish police take over oil tanker Eagle S, suspected of damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2.
Alternative blurb II: Eagle S, suspected of damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2, is transferred to Porvoo for investigation.
News source(s): https://yle.fi/a/74-20133526
Credits:
- Nominated by NotAGenious (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: I'll try to combine https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eagle_S_on_the_map_of_MarineTraffic,_in_relation_to_the_Estlink_2_incident.png with the cropped version of the Estlink map if I get a chance to do so. A significant event mentioned in multiple international news sources. NotAGenious (talk) 14:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as it's yet clear the exact cause, whether intentional sabotage or something else. Just having massive reporting doesn't necessarily make it an appropriate WP topic since WP is not a newspaper. Masem (t) 16:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that finding an exact cause should be a requirement for appearing on the main page: the article, which has speculation from reliable sources, is useful by itself. NotAGenious (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose since it's not the first cable damaged in the area this past month and I doubt the impact will be anywhere near the Nord Stream sabotage in 2022. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 17:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:SPECULATION. Sorry, but we don’t post speculations.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- it's confirmed that an outside force destroyed the cable, just the cause is under investigation NotAGenious (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support there's nothing speculative about an international sabotage incident that is an act of economic terrorism, and given the type of incident it is we may never know the full true story (just like in falsified elections for example), that shouldn't barr a posting though; WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a compelling argument either. Abcmaxx (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- The blurb speculates that the incident was caused by a Russian oil tanker (this isn't even mentioned in the article). Furthermore, the article is in bad shape to demonstrate why this incident is significant.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- the article does mention it. NotAGenious (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Now that it's improved, yes, but it didn't when I wrote the comment.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, it was.
the tanker Eagle S, registered to the Cook Islands and part of Russia's shadow fleet...
NotAGenious (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)The police confirmed that the tanker is suspected of having caused the failure
- No, it was.
- Now that it's improved, yes, but it didn't when I wrote the comment.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- the article does mention it. NotAGenious (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The blurb speculates that the incident was caused by a Russian oil tanker (this isn't even mentioned in the article). Furthermore, the article is in bad shape to demonstrate why this incident is significant.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, although the blurb needs to be updated. A bigger story here is that Finland has seized a Russian tanker suspected of being involved in cutting the cable.[17] Nsk92 (talk) 23:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support even on the off-chance it was accidental, still a series incident. –DMartin 01:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've added an alternative blurb and #Reactions. NotAGenious (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Notified WT:FINLAND and WT:ESTONIA for further input here. NotAGenious (talk) 18:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Per above, do not add votes without giving your reason. Stephen 07:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's a major incident with huge coverage and international reactions. ArionStar (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Per above, do not add votes without giving your reason. Stephen 07:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Unusual international incident that our well-sourced article is being updated on. No tags, though the redlinks are arguably distracting. NATO response is highly notable. Given increasing tensions in the Baltic and the continuing news coverage, this altblurb is a good fit for ITN. Jusdafax (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - There was a covering of the Baltic Sea Disruptions in current events a few weeks ago. This is also notable due to rising geopolitical tensions. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Important enough in the context of the present cold war between East and West. Tradediatalk 02:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is this stale? The earliest item on ITN is from December 26. Natg 19 (talk) 07:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- If we're going with the alternative blurb, it's actually the 26th. If we want a blurb telling about the transfer to Porvoo for investigation, it was yesterday, the 29th. NotAGenious (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- The admins didn't check the consensus in time. A pity. ArionStar (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've added a second alt blurb (transfer to Porvoo) and request further comments.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NotAGenious (talk • contribs) 11:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Updated image. NotAGenious (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- If we're going with the alternative blurb, it's actually the 26th. If we want a blurb telling about the transfer to Porvoo for investigation, it was yesterday, the 29th. NotAGenious (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Abcmaxx, Dmartin969, ArionStar, SimpleSubCubicGraph, and Tradedia: The original blurb is now stale. Please confirm which, if any, of the alt blurbs is suitable.—Bagumba (talk) 10:39, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is not suitable… a pity. :( ArionStar (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- either altblurb is fine Abcmaxx (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- either altblurb is fine. Tradediatalk 09:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- either altblurb is fine Abcmaxx (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is not suitable… a pity. :( ArionStar (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose whether stale or not. Article fails to demonstrate the impacts of the cable damage beyond what generally appear to be mild monetary concerns, without knowing how per-person energy prices will exactly be impacted by this. DarkSide830 (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- what about the reactions on a political basis? NotAGenious (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support the newest alt-blurb. This is a widely reported story about a specific prominent incident relating to a signficant wider crisis. It's not covered by ongoing, and I think the strongly suspected involvement of the Russian government is very relevant. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment re: stale The orig blub was already stale by 29 Dec, when the oldest blurb was Manmohan Singh's death on the 26th.[18]—Bagumba (talk) 07:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The power failure is stale news. Blurbs should generally avoid speculation of what is suspected, leaving the nuanced NPOV details for the article. Stick to blurbing more tangible events like formal charges, sanctions, retaliation, etc.—Bagumba (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per GenevieveDEon. The story now is not the power failure, but Finland's actions against the Russian shadow fleet. The way this nomination has evolved is very confusing, however. It would have been better to close the original nomination, and start a new one with the capture of the tanker by the Finns. Khuft (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
2024 Chadian parliamentary election
[edit]Blurb: Chad holds its legislative elections that have been delayed several times since 2011. (Post)
News source(s): [19]
Credits:
- Nominated by History6042 (talk · give credit)
- Wait until official results are in. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 01:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Reluctant oppose No results posted yet and otherwise, quality just isn't there. This nom is likely to roll off or become stale before either of those issues are addressed. The Kip (contribs) 19:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted blurb) RD/Blurb Jimmy Carter
[edit]Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: Former American president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jimmy Carter dies at the age of 100 (Post)
Alternative blurb: Former United States president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jimmy Carter dies at the age of 100.
Alternative blurb II: Former president of the United States and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jimmy Carter dies at the age of 100.
Alternative blurb III: Nobel Peace laureate and former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, behind the campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis, dies at 100.
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:
- Nominated by Nableezy (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Definite Support No questions about it, as a former president and humanitarian that recently passed away. He a left lasting legacy and impact on the world. -- Rager7 (talk)
- Support blurb - obviously. No quality concerns as its a GA. --estar8806 (talk) ★ 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb The death of a former US President is notable, and the story is being reported by basically every source. Gust Justice (talk) 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb - A bit more of an update is needed, and a few floating "is" etc are still about, but obviously this should be a blurb. Departure– (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- These seem to have been fixed. Mooonswimmer 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support - Death of a former president. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. - Sebbog13 (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support blurb - I've been vocal about the US-bias of many nominations here. But this is a no-brainer. Nfitz (talk) 21:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb This should be an uncontroversial one. No quality concerns. May he rest in peace. Vanilla Wizard 💙 21:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb no brainer, article is in good shape Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 21:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb, Normally against US-bias but I think this is a fairly straightforward yes to a blurb here. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb with picture - extraordinarily influential figure, especially given his prolonged and impactful post-presidential career. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb Article is updated and a GA. Mooonswimmer 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted blurb charlotte 👸🎄 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is it a caching error? I don't see it. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- It should be there now. I couldn't see it earlier either. Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is it a caching error? I don't see it. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb per above. Grimes2 (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb/picture blurb GA article of a significant U.S. president. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Added altblurb2 -- AFAICT we usually say "president of X" not "X president", e.g. right now with Manmohan Singh. Giraffer (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction! 31.44.227.152 (talk) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support I think it's pretty evident; rest well. Nishi (talk 21:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb with picture, but suggest the following expansion to honor what he described as his most important legacy:
– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Nobel Peace laureate and former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, behind the campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis, dies at 100.
- Weak oppose only the part mentioning dracunculiasis, since it's only briefly mentioned once in the target article. Support everything else. Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm adding more; it's probably his most important work in terms of overall impact, but nobody's heard of it. Carter, along with Viktor Zhdanov, is probably one of two human beings who can claim credit for eradicating a major disease. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- (BTW this isn't me saying this, it's Carter—seeing them dead was his last wish.) – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 01:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose only the part mentioning dracunculiasis, since it's only briefly mentioned once in the target article. Support everything else. Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting - charlotte, would you be willing to also add "Nobel laureate" to the blurb, as suggested by the blurbs listed? Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think him being a Nobel laureate is significant enough (relative to him being president) to include in the blurb, but happy to add it/have it added if consensus here/one of the ITN admins think it should be there. charlotte 👸🎄 22:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- That was the blurb supported by everybody? nableezy - 22:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think him being a Nobel laureate is significant enough (relative to him being president) to include in the blurb, but happy to add it/have it added if consensus here/one of the ITN admins think it should be there. charlotte 👸🎄 22:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality (but its been posted so too late for this) - the article does not provide a reason why he was a great or major figure - even though I know this should be the case. The Legacy section addresses his mediocere presidency but does not touch on his post-presidency efforts which is where this factor is coming from. I know this can be made, either from existing sources or from the obits coming out, but this should really be in place, a crystal clear section for reader to review of why a person was posted as a blurb on death, rather than all the hand-waving that is going on. Also, we should not be assuming that every former world leader should be blurbed. Masem (t) 21:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your wishes are demanding. Support addition of Nobel Prize laureate, only presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Barack Obama, Al Gore (Vice) are recipients. Grimes2 (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The final paragraph of the lede & the lengthy Post-presidency (1981–2024) section do a fine enough job articulating his post-presidency efforts that opposing posting altogether is a bit much. That said, there is a lot of information in Post-presidency of Jimmy Carter which could be used to further expand the section on his main biographical page. Vanilla Wizard 💙 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The statement in the lede "but his post-presidency period (the longest in U.S. history) has received near-universal praise, including a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002." is not directly supported by sources in the bio article, though I'm sure the post-presidency article has that. This is a quality issue that should have been addressed before posting; I'm not doubting this, but absence of this type of information with sources on the main bio page is a problem even if that seems apparently obvious. Masem (t) 04:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support RIP. Davey2116 (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support for it being posted. Storied career, amazing, that he had such long marriage. BilboBeggins (talk) 22:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support, at least he made it to 100. Sahaib (talk) 23:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Can Nobel laureate be added to the blurb as the nomination that all the support votes at the time of posting were referencing? Carters post-presidency is widely regarded as a defining trait of his life. nableezy - 03:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support addition of Nobel laureate, as this is prominently noted, often in the headlines, for major media sources covering this death. BD2412 T 03:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support: Rest in peace to an incredible man, while not the most spectacular during his presidency, he definitely shaped a shining legacy after leaving office. Carter will continue to live on as one of the most memorable presidents the United States has ever had. Tofusaurus (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support Article is in good shape, has been updated to the bone and Carter is an example of what warrants a death blurb. Remarkable legacy, treated harshly by history. Rest well, to a great humanitarian and humble being. Support adding Nobel to blurb I mean, he's also a nobel winner and most obits are including his laureate status to their headlines as well. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Added Nobel laureate. charlotte 👸🎄 08:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Queen of Hearts: please could you revert this. You were correct in your comment above. There is a standard format for death blurbs, particularly of former leaders, and we don't usually "editorialise" in ITN blurbs. Him being the preskdent is the reason he's blurbed rather than his Nobel prize, and it should simply state that, in the same way as the former Indian PM further down. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t editorializing and since when did we substitute an admins judgment over consensus for a blurb? nableezy - 09:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's totally editorializing. Inserting fluff about Carter winning a Nobel prize that isn't really relevant to the story of his death. To maintain NPOV and avoid bias at ITN, we stick to a standard blurb format for all politician deaths rather than going with bespoke wording for individuals that people happen to like, based on whatever random WP:LOCALCONSENSUS forms. Henry Kissinger also won a Nobel prize, but our blurb on him made no mention of that, so why the difference here? Admins are precisely supposed to use their judgment in these matters, as indeed charlotte did above, that's always been part of the remit. — Amakuru (talk) 10:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Amakuru, no need to add extra honours when its the office that he held that the vast majority of the world know him for. We didn't list Singh with his Indian of the Year or his Adam Smith awards so why do we need to further decorate Carter when President is prestigious enough. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Removed the Nobel. Stephen 12:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- To be fair, the Adam Smith Prize or the Indian of the Year honor is not even close to the Nobel Prize. When Kofi Annan died, we listed his Nobel honor into the blurb. Same with Shimon Peres. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t fluff, and there isn’t any overriding consensus that you can point to to claim that this is a local one that can be ignored. This is one of his main legacies, his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency. It is not fluff, it is not editorializing, and that part of the main page is not the fiefdom of a few admins here. This should be restored and this discussions consensus respected. nableezy - 12:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Even if
his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency
, a questionable premise, he would be notable for that and not for being a Nobel prize laureate. Look at the first sentence of his article as it's always been: Only mentions president (and later humanitarian), no mention of Nobel laureate. The article itself indicates that being a laureate wasn't notable at all in comparison to what he's actually primarily known for, which is a president of the United States. Therefore (imo), saying that he's a Nobel prize laureate in ITN would indeed fall under UNDUE editorializing fluff. spintheer (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Only mentions president (and later humanitarian)
So... it mentions the work that earned him the Nobel Prize. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- He's notable for his work as a president and a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate or the receiver or any other prizes (or otherwise) that resulted from his work as a president and a humanitarian. If you want to push for adding in the blurb that he was a humanitarian, be my guest. spintheer (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Its almost as if your point hadn’t been proven false before your first response here nableezy - 03:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that if the article indicates that Carter's notable for first being a president, and second being a humanitarian, ITN should reflect that and not go off on its own bizarre mini RFCs to establish local consensus about Carter's notability outside of the article's talk page. If you want to establish that Carter was as notable for being a Nobel lauereate as he was for being the president of the United States or a humanitarian, then first get that changed in the first sentence of the article and then come back here and have the blurb reflect this change. spintheer (talk) 04:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Even if
- I have to agree with Amakuru, no need to add extra honours when its the office that he held that the vast majority of the world know him for. We didn't list Singh with his Indian of the Year or his Adam Smith awards so why do we need to further decorate Carter when President is prestigious enough. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's totally editorializing. Inserting fluff about Carter winning a Nobel prize that isn't really relevant to the story of his death. To maintain NPOV and avoid bias at ITN, we stick to a standard blurb format for all politician deaths rather than going with bespoke wording for individuals that people happen to like, based on whatever random WP:LOCALCONSENSUS forms. Henry Kissinger also won a Nobel prize, but our blurb on him made no mention of that, so why the difference here? Admins are precisely supposed to use their judgment in these matters, as indeed charlotte did above, that's always been part of the remit. — Amakuru (talk) 10:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Every death blurb (for death by old age or other natural causes) leaves it as the principle profession that the person had, and avoids editorization. Definitely should not be adding "Nobel winner" here. — Masem (t) 13:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- And just to add, keeping the death blurb to just the profession prevents further bickering around the whole death blurb nomination aspect already. The inclusion of profession and profession only is a nice neutral way to present the blurb without trying to fight consensus on what other apsects to include. If the article is of good quality, other key factors (like Carter's humanitarism) should be identified within the lede. — Masem (t) 13:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t true as demonstrated by the examples cited already. Whatever, this place doesn’t exactly abide by our rules anyway, what’s one more example? nableezy - 13:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, media reporting on the death widely reference the Nobel Prize in what would be the equivalent of our blurb. See:
- Reuters: "Jimmy Carter, former US president and Nobel Peace Prize recipient, dead at 100"
- ABC News leads with "Jimmy Carter, the former U.S. president known as a champion of international human rights both during and after his White House tenure and who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his lifetime of dedication to that cause, has died at 100";
- The Washington Post leads with "Jimmy Carter, a no-frills Southern governor with a mile-wide smile who was elected president in 1976 and served only one term before leading an extraordinary post-presidential life that included the Nobel Peace Prize, died Sunday at his home in Plains, Georgia...";
- BBC News reports, "after leaving the White House with low approval ratings, his reputation was restored through humanitarian work which earned him the Nobel Peace Prize";
- The Guardian reports that "Carter spent the decades afterward focused on international relations and human rights, efforts that won him the Nobel peace prize in 2002";
- The Associated Press blurb on the subject says "Former President Jimmy Carter, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and the longest-living chief executive in U.S. history, has died".
- This is not fluff, this is the key fact. BD2412 T 17:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t editorializing and since when did we substitute an admins judgment over consensus for a blurb? nableezy - 09:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Queen of Hearts: please could you revert this. You were correct in your comment above. There is a standard format for death blurbs, particularly of former leaders, and we don't usually "editorialise" in ITN blurbs. Him being the preskdent is the reason he's blurbed rather than his Nobel prize, and it should simply state that, in the same way as the former Indian PM further down. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post posting support blurb No brainer support for death of former head of state/government. News across the world, article is in fantastic shape. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 13:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support inclusion of Nobel Prize and agree with other supporters above, his article quotes Polls of historians and political scientists generally rank Carter as a below-average president. Scholars and the public more favorably view his post-presidency, and winning a noble prize precisely shows this with other things. It may seem editorializing to few, but many disagree. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 17:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This was closed, who reopened it? Can someone re-close it? Further blurb deliberation should be at WP:ERRORS. Departure– (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is an editorial decision, not a content error.—Bagumba (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Significant blurb changes are at ITNC. Errors are used only for small corrections. — Masem (t) 19:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support including something about the humanitarian post-presidency career (e.g. the Nobel), which is the thing Carter is known for. It would make more sense to cut out the presidency TBH. (Though I wouldn't do that either). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: all blurbs in this widely-supported nomination mention the Nobel Peace Prize, showing a very clear consensus for its inclusion. So why are we unilaterally not including it? RachelTensions (talk) 21:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Adding my support for including "Nobel Peace Prize laureate" in the blurb; his post-presidency was arguably as transformative as his time as president, and has received comparable RS coverage in the obits. Given that all the proposed blurbs included the Nobel, I did not feel the need to state this in my !vote above. Davey2116 (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose mention of Nobel Prize per Amakuru as it is editorializing the blurb to choose to add that secondary piece of info, which wasn’t included in Henry Kissinger’s blurb. Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 05:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Restored Nobel to the blurb. It's been in the blurb candiates from the beginning, and there is consensus since the post for its inclusion. As mentioned above with Annan and Peres previously, it's not unprecedented. In other fields, I also see some recent examples beyond a simple listing of their occupation.[20][21] This is not required, and there are merits to avoiding squabbles with a more vanilla blurb. But there's no current rule at WP:ITN barring it, and the community can apply WP:WEIGHT, where needed, as was done here. This is consistent with the WP:YESPOV policy:
—Bagumba (talk) 05:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)As such, the neutral point of view does not mean the exclusion of certain points of view; rather, it means including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight.
- The community establishes WP:WEIGHT in the article's talk page, not in ITN. The article indicates that Carter is first and foremost notable for being a president and secondarily as a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate. If ITN doesn't directly reflect that's written in the corresponding article, this sets a ridiculous precedent where anything can be written in ITN blurbs so long as there is local consensus for it here (if tomorrow we'll have a blurb that Carter has come back to life while the article's obviously unchanged, and enough people vote for that blurb, would that also be posted?) ITN discussions have significantly less editorial rigor and oversight than an actual article talk page, and shouldn't be the place to make substantive arguments about content, especially ones that very clearly would not, and have not, passed in the article's talk page itself (e.g. in this case that Carter's Nobel prize is anywhere near as notable as his occupation as a president). spintheer (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
this sets a ridiculous precedent
: I had written, "This is not required". This blurb, in itself, does not set a precedent, any more than Annon or Peres did. The community is free to update WP:ITNBLURB to provide more guidance to posters on blurbs w.r.t. article leads, if there is consensus. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 07:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- He was a noted humanitarian, not a Nobel prize winner. And which Nobel anyways? Explains nothing about what the prize was for. Stephen 09:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- The blurb says Nobel Peace. Nobody had proposed humanitarian in the blurb, but feel free to gain consensus whether it makes more sense to be generic. —Bagumba (talk) 09:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- He was a noted humanitarian, not a Nobel prize winner. And which Nobel anyways? Explains nothing about what the prize was for. Stephen 09:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- The community establishes WP:WEIGHT in the article's talk page, not in ITN. The article indicates that Carter is first and foremost notable for being a president and secondarily as a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate. If ITN doesn't directly reflect that's written in the corresponding article, this sets a ridiculous precedent where anything can be written in ITN blurbs so long as there is local consensus for it here (if tomorrow we'll have a blurb that Carter has come back to life while the article's obviously unchanged, and enough people vote for that blurb, would that also be posted?) ITN discussions have significantly less editorial rigor and oversight than an actual article talk page, and shouldn't be the place to make substantive arguments about content, especially ones that very clearly would not, and have not, passed in the article's talk page itself (e.g. in this case that Carter's Nobel prize is anywhere near as notable as his occupation as a president). spintheer (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support for inclusion of some mention of his post-presidency humanitarian efforts, whether that means mentioning the Nobel Peace Prize or some other language. (I already !voted so this second !vote is only on the language and not the notability or quality.) It isn't a double standard that we didn't mention this for Kissinger. It was simply less relevant for Kissinger and more relevant for Carter. The post-presidency work Carter did to earn that Nobel was arguably more transformative than anything he did in his role as president, so mentioning it separately from his presidency makes sense. The same can't be said of Kissinger. I'd still be fine with replacing the word Nobel Laureate with the word humanitarian since some editors take issue with the decoration, but I'm also fine with just leaving it how it is right now and keeping the Nobel Laureate phrasing. Just as long as the phrasing acknowledges that this is a unique case where him being the president was perhaps not even the most important thing he did with his life. This isn't setting a dangerous precedent or slippery slope, he legitimately may be the only president in US history and one of few leaders worldwide who left the highest office in the land and then went on to do bigger and better things after that. Vanilla Wizard 💙 14:26, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
simply less relevant for Kissinger
is an opinion and the double standard here. Both individuals won a Nobel prize, and the articles of both individuals indicate that neither are notable for receiving that Nobel prize. The only discernible difference is personal opinion in ITN. spintheer (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- It would be a double standard if my position was that the Nobel Prize is itself inherently blurbworthy, but that isn't my view. It's worth mentioning separately for Carter because the reason why he received the award was for noteworthy contributions separate from his presidency. Kissinger's award was for his official duties as the Secretary of State, not for something separate. It's not about liking Carter more than Kissinger. For transparency I also won't deny that myself and likely many others do hold Carter in higher regard than Kissinger, but this isn't relevant to the discussion or the reasoning. It's simply about communicating that Carter's post-presidency is at least half of the reason why he's blurbworthy, even to those who are against blurbing just any former US president. With Kissinger, his time as Secretary of State was the sole reason. As I said before, I'm fine with replacing the award with the word humanitarian if it looks too decorative. I just don't take issue with the current wording. Vanilla Wizard 💙 16:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, then say humanitarian, not nobel laureate. Ok, it looks like this isn't going to change, but this is an error that'll come back to bite us the next time somebody decides to editorialize some other news event. spintheer (talk) 16:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- It would be a double standard if my position was that the Nobel Prize is itself inherently blurbworthy, but that isn't my view. It's worth mentioning separately for Carter because the reason why he received the award was for noteworthy contributions separate from his presidency. Kissinger's award was for his official duties as the Secretary of State, not for something separate. It's not about liking Carter more than Kissinger. For transparency I also won't deny that myself and likely many others do hold Carter in higher regard than Kissinger, but this isn't relevant to the discussion or the reasoning. It's simply about communicating that Carter's post-presidency is at least half of the reason why he's blurbworthy, even to those who are against blurbing just any former US president. With Kissinger, his time as Secretary of State was the sole reason. As I said before, I'm fine with replacing the award with the word humanitarian if it looks too decorative. I just don't take issue with the current wording. Vanilla Wizard 💙 16:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
(Removed) Remove Ongoing: 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon
[edit]Nominator's comments: The Ongoing section would benefit from some shortening, and this item seems like the best candidate for removal. The Israeli incursion in Lebanon is not in the news anymore (and the last event mentioned in the article dates back to 17 Dec). This is in contrast to the war in Gaza, or Israel's actions in Yemen, which are much more prominently covered in global news. Khuft (talk) 19:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing—looks like the most sensible thing to trim. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 23:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose the only reason nothing is happening is because the 2024 Israel–Lebanon ceasefire agreement is in place. However than will end soon as it is only a 60 day ceasefire. 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- If it ends and the war restarts, we post again PrecariousWorlds (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Im wondering if maybe we need to do a () next to Israel-Hamas war with all of the other Middle East battles that are also involving Israel, like Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, so on. TheCorriynial (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- There was a recent suggestion to include the entire listing of conflicts in the Middle East, but the problem is that they are not all directly related. While we can point to the Israel-Lebonon conflict as directly related to the Israel-Hamas one, events in Yemen or Syria are absolutely not part of that. That makes it all synthesis to combine them all. --Masem (t) 21:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing, no updates recently. BilboBeggins (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing This is no longer hot, as indicated by lack of recent updates. There are low intensity incidents happening and might continue for months, but does not justify "Ongoing". Tradediatalk 02:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose not only has Israel violated the ceasefire almost every single day its been in force, but there is no signs that they are going to continue the ceasefire after its 60 days. Scuba 15:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ongoing is not about if the event is still going on, but if the target article or an appropriate subarticle has been receiving updates, which has not been happening here. — Masem (t) 15:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removal Lack of recent updates; per nom. If hostilities resume after the ceasefire, this can be re-nominated for addition at that time. SpencerT•C 06:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Removed There's consensus for removal. If things flare up again, for example when the ceasefire expires, we can re-evaluate the situation. Schwede66 07:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) Houston Tornado Outbreak
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Tornado outbreak in the Houston Area killing 2 people and injuring many others (Post)
Alternative blurb: 2 people dead after tornado outbreak in the Houston area
Support but with a completely reworded blurb. Three or more are dead, so the blurb is innacurate. How about "At least three people are killed during a widespread tornado outbreak across the Southern United States." I oppose adding an image as of now.
- Meh. oppose per below. EF5 20:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Seems pretty minor, hard to find coverage outside the US media. Nfitz (talk) 20:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - not important overall. @EF5: we hardly post tornado outbreaks on ITN, and the smallest one I think that got posted was Rolling Fork's outbreak. The most recent was March 31, 2023, and almost every outbreak since then (with the possible exceptions of May 25 and April 26) have been well below the bar of importance for ITN. I'll add conditional weak support if the record-breaking claim of the Port Arthur tornado's duration is confirmed, but I highly doubt that. Departure– (talk) 20:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not significant, at least not yet. Very minor. Setarip (talk) 20:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The oddness here is how late in the year this came, likely a result of global warming, but even with that, the relatively small death toll makes this a minor outbreak in the larger scheme of things. --Masem (t) 21:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Late-season outbreaks have always happened. We posted the last big December outbreak (the one in Kentucky, USA) on merit as an outbreak, not based on climate change. I couldn't tell you why actual climate-change related blurbs (such as the yearly "hottest day in history" blurbs) never get posted. Departure– (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Because as long as there's little progress to stall climate change by major nations, these records are always going to get broken year after year. And the 2021 outbreak was likely posted due to the high death toll (70+). — Masem (t) 22:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Late-season outbreaks have always happened. We posted the last big December outbreak (the one in Kentucky, USA) on merit as an outbreak, not based on climate change. I couldn't tell you why actual climate-change related blurbs (such as the yearly "hottest day in history" blurbs) never get posted. Departure– (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose Tragic, but it’s a typical tornado outbreak. Two deaths is very small compared to very notable tornado outbreaks like the 2011 Super Outbreak. INeedSupport 🎄 21:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis
[edit]Blurb: 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis continues with Mikheil Kavelashvili inaugurated and Salome Zourabichvili claiming to remain President. (Post)
Alternative blurb: 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis continues with Mikheil Kavelashvili inaugurated while Salome Zourabichvili says she remains President.
Alternative blurb II: Amidst opposition protests, Mikheil Kavelashvili inaugurated President of Georgia.
Alternative blurb III: A governmental crisis occurs in Georgia, as Mikheil Kavelashvili is inaugurated as president while incumbent Salome Zourabichvili intends to remain in office.
Alternative blurb IV: Mikheil Kavelashvili is inaugurated as President of Georgia while incumbent Salome Zourabichvili intends to remain in office amidst a constitutional crisis.
News source(s): Al Jazeera; The Guardian; Associated Press; BBC
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Boud (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: The 2024–2025 Georgian post-election protests that have accompanied this crisis have been ongoing daily for two months with the biggest participation estimated at around 100,000 people - several percent of the total Georgian population. Boud (talk) 11:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The expression "claiming that" is a bit WP:WEASELly;
and Salome Zourabichvili stating that she retains her legitimacy as President
would be more neutral, avoiding the connotation that Wikipedia is sceptical about her POV. I've added altblurb which seems less weaselly to me. Boud (talk) 11:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) - Ongoing? The nomination is not clear whether it's proposing this as an ongoing entry. Many other places have ongoing political tensions and rivalries so I reckon we need some big incident or civil war for this to stand out. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The event itself - the overall crisis - is ongoing, but the Western mainstream media news coverage is not intense enough to justify ongoing in the ITN sense. This is not a proposal for ITN "Ongoing". In terms of the wording, it would be inaccurate to suggest that today's inauguration was a sudden crisis - it's a key symbolic event within the overall crisis - so "continuing" in the blurb is accurate. Boud (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely has more encyclopedic value than the electoral college vote a few weeks earlier. Depending on how the world reacts, it could be a repeat of the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Scaramouche33 (talk) 13:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose There is a similar Ongoing constitutional crisis in Somalia, WP:ITNUPDATE. QalasQalas (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Response Somalia has been in a civil war for decades now, it has gotten its place in the spotlight but has faded away with time. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
strongweak support altblurb2 came here to nominate it, glad to see I was beaten to it. The inauguration is perhaps more important than the non-popular election itself with the repercussions per Scaramouche33 (day-before form PM and GD leader was sanctioned with many other by the state department). What the now former president claims is not relevant encyclopaedically/ITN. It is for the sub-article/s though.She'll likely be arrested before the new year if not tonight. It's 21:15 atm.Doesn't seem like much more than western msm blather quoting a french woman, she has left the presidential palace, despite claiming there is a train there and who will move her.Sportsnut24 (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)- Support Definitely something to take note of. Additionally, I suspect Russia might invade Georgia again, to prop up the Dream Party. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb 3 per above. Added altblurb 3. Departure– (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- oppose altblurb3 she has left the presidential palace. She cannot conduct an enforeceable actions such as signing bills.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support No one knows who the president of georgia is now, but it is an inauguration Setarip (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- everybody knows who the new prez is after being sworn in with his predecessor leaving the presidential palace.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Leaving Orbeliani Palace has some but not much significance; it's not the presidential palace, it's a presidential palace; Zourabichvili was the first president to reside there: "Salome Zurabishvili to relocate Presidential Residence from Avlabari to Orbeliani Palace", 29 Nov 2018. Boud (talk) 01:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- everybody knows who the new prez is after being sworn in with his predecessor leaving the presidential palace.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Important enough in the context of cold war between East and West. Georgia is one of the battlegrounds. Tradediatalk 02:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Article is a bit short for a leadership dispute of this magnitude, but it's good enough for posting. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:42, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per TDKR. ArionStar (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @admins, please, check the consensus. ArionStar (talk) 02:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The article has increased in length, and attracting more editors to these articles would be useful, since the situation is even more complicated than stated in any of the blurbs: most of the sources seem to say that the de facto ruler of Georgia is a third person, Bidzina Ivanishvili, but they also consider it so obvious ("everyone" knows it) that it's not worth paying much attention to. Wikipedia content about his role in this context will improve with more people editing with good sources. I'm not proposing to change the blurb further - I would go for either Alt I or Alt IV. (Alt II seems a bit narrow, focussing on the protests rather than the broader political/institutional crisis. Alt III is not quite correct, since in principle, the government is run by the prime minister.) Boud (talk) 18:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Blurb IV is ready. ArionStar (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Per TDKR. ArionStar (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - A major political crisis. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Schwede66: It's ready. ArionStar (talk) 14:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Posted ALT4. Schwede66 18:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) Jeju Air Flight 2216
[edit]Blurb: A Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 crashes at Muan International Airport, South Korea, after hitting a fence while attempting to land with 47 casualties reported out of 181 passengers on board. (Post)
Alternative blurb: At least 47 people are killed when a Jeju Air plane carrying 181 passengers crashed at Muan International Airport in South Korea.
Alternative blurb II: Jeju Air Flight 2216 crashes at Muan International Airport, South Korea, killing at least 47.
News source(s): (Bloomberg)
Credits:
- Nominated by QalasQalas (talk · give credit)
- Created by Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: I think it needs a bit of work.
- Support Absolutely horrific footage, definitely worthy of the front page. --MaximumMangoCloset (talk) 02:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support holiday season is deadly this year. ArionStar (talk) 02:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Terrible year for Korea PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely three deadly crashes within a month. QalasQalas (talk) 02:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support A no brainer, major plane crash with dozens of fatalities. JDiala (talk) 02:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt Blurb III Article probably needs its quality improved, but absolutely a notable event. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 02:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt Blurb II in line with the Flight 8243. Also, the death toll has reportly risen to 47. Unnamelessness (talk) 02:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Considering that if the death count ends up being over 132 it will have been the deadliest crash since 2020, this is quite a major incident and it deserves to be here. (offtopic but why was both the start and end of this year so bad for aviation?) interstatefive 02:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support could become the deadliest crash this year with 178 possible fatalities and its already the second deadliest. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST)
- Strong Support Dozens of fatalities have been found. Major news coverage. Article is a bit short but that is because there is no conclusive info yet, as the incident happened three hours ago. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST)
- Support seems to have extensive coverage from South Korean News sources, some western sources are also picking up on the accident. Yosh56 (talk) 10:02 PM. 28 December 2024 (EST)
- Strong support altblurb 2. For a new disaster article less than half an hour old it's of fantastic quality. This might be less geopolitically important than the crash in Kazakhstan but the human toll is telling. Departure– (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Altburlb II Fatality numbers can be updated via WP:ERRORS#Errors with "In the news". – robertsky (talk) 03:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
December 28
[edit]
December 28, 2024
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Mary Anne Krupsak
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [22]
Credits:
- Nominated by Engineerchange (talk · give credit)
- Updated by CmdrDan (talk · give credit) and Connormah (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Lieutenant governor of New York --Engineerchange (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Sources , no dead refs, size , high quality NYT obit. Summary: passed. Grimes2 (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Krupsak, however, was the first woman nominated for (and elected to) the lieutenant governorship
is a key sentence in this bio and it's unreferenced. Schwede66 19:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)- Added Ref: New York's first female lieutenant governor, Mary Anne Krupsak, has died at age 92. Grimes2 (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Pretty close, but article could use some additional info regarding what she accomplished in her position as Lieutenant Governor. SpencerT•C 05:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Martin Karplus
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [23]
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Math-ghamhainn (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Theoretical chemist, Nobel Prize laureate Grimes2 (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Unreferenced date of birth. Schwede66 19:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 05:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Shigeko Sasamori
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:
- Created and nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Survivor of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and an advocate for peace and nuclear disarmament. Died on December 15. Death reported on December 28. TJMSmith (talk) 02:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support The article is mainly based on the NYT obit, but this is ok. Every paragraph is sourced. 2989 characters (465 words) "readable prose size". Article was created on December 31, 2024. Grimes2 (talk) 16:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 05:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Kari Dziedzic
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ‘’Minnesota Public Radio’’
Credits:
- Nominated by Malvoliox (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Sitting Minnesota state senator and former majority leader, hoping to expand the article a little/add electoral history and more details about political work, but also want to make sure we can clean up any issues with citations etc. that I didn’t catch. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 14:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Malvoliox, the better source needed tag should ideally be resolved. Otherwise, support. charlotte 👸🎄 01:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Replaced the bad source with a reliable recent one that details the case. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 15:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: As mentioned in nom, needs additional info about what she accomplished while in office. SpencerT•C 05:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Charles Dolan
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hollywood Reporter
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American billionaire businessman, founder of Cablevision and HBO. 240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389 (talk) 07:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, article is well-cited and I don't see any quality issues. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, article is long enough and well-sourced, with no apparent issues. Could use some spot verification. Mooonswimmer 01:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted charlotte 👸🎄 01:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
References
[edit]Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents:
- ^ "Meghalt Keleti Ágnes". Blikk (in Hungarian). 2 January 2025.