Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:59, 10 January 2025

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to People. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Note: In most cases there is another, more specific category than this one.

If possible, please use one of these instead:

Note: The following pages are transcluded onto the Biography Deletion sorting page

Note: the following pages are not transcluded onto the Biography Deletion sorting page

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion (e.g. models)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women
Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion for adult film actors and actresses

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary, it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|People|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to People.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

Purge page cache

watch

People

1oneam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo piece on a non-notable musician. Rejected at AfC but moved into the mainspace regardless, speedy requested but the tag was removed, so here we are at AfD. No evidence of notability, the sources don't come even close to meeting WP:GNG, BEFORE finds only social media and streaming sites, and there is nothing in this draft to suggest WP:MUSICBIO notability either. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music, and United States of America. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James V. LaSala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, California, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

David Lee (still photographer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear case of WP:NOTINHERITED. Everything is related to his brother Spike Lee in a search. Article is sourced to a self published website. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 05:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Film, Television, Photography, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abner Louima

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:VICTIM and WP:BLP1E. We shouldn't have a biography on a person who is only known for being the victim of a crime. A possible WP:ATD would be repurposing this to an event page in the same we that we often do with murders and other crimes.4meter4 (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, Florida, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Lydell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP other than IMDB as an external link. Not clear the subject meets WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, Television, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Vincent Lockwood

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The one viewable source has only one sentence of coverage. The other offline source can't support the entire text because it was published in 1926. The death information in 1951 is therefore unreferenced. We can therefore only assume that the Hubbard text is only supporting his participation in the Free Masons. There's not enough here to meet WP:SIGCOV/ WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Law, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Vera Monroig

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Easily fails WP:GNG as it did last year when previously deleted, and there has been no new or near substantial coverage. Snowycats (talk) 05:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, and Puerto Rico. Snowycats (talk) 05:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edward J. Megarr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on military journals and newsletters like the Marine Corps Gazette. Not sure if we should consider these independent enough to meet WP:SIGCOV (in the same way that we usually don't count trade journals and magazines in other fields). Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 04:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, California, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - a quick gsearchs seems to show a few other hits, and a three-star general is almost absolutely notable. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete you'd presume a Major general would be notable, but there aren't enough WP:RS to support that presumption, so fails WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 05:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spencer Ross

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. The one source used only has one sentence of coverage of the subject.4meter4 (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added two in-depth sources which should help to sort things out. With how much sports media there is in and around New York, you had to know there'd be something. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Radio, Television, Sports, Florida, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Steven O'Mahoney-Schwartz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on primary and non-independent sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 03:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 03:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Peters (software engineer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While relatively well known in the Python community I'm not finding general reliable sources to establish notability. NE Ent 21:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE No notability for wikipedia, would be enough for pythonpedia thou. Warmonger123 (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Some coverage here: https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/09/core_python_developer_suspended_coc/ ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 03:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Pustilnik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on primary sources. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 02:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 02:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akin Ogunbiyi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for politicians and does not pass WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Politicians, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Rodriguez (photographer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. The New York magazine piece is a great feature of his photographs but there isn't much prose about the subject accompanying the photos. The other source is the subject's website. There's not enough indepth coverage here to justify an article.4meter4 (talk) 01:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, Photography, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 02:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edd Gould

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've been pondering on nominating this for AfD, and I've finally come to the conclusion that this article is not eligible for standalone notability and should either be deleted or merged into Eddsworld (if that article is even notable at this point with such sketchy sourcing). A WP:BEFORE search brings up obituary-style sources and passing mentions in articles. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 01:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Europe, and United Kingdom. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 01:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Internet. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 01:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 01:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

David Dimitri

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious notablity. The previous Afd claimed "good sources" which were subsequently refbombed to the article. I reviewed them (and some others) and see nothing but short blurbs in run-off-the-mill reviews of some circus performances and no significant coverage of the person in depth. --Altenmann >talk 23:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Full quotes from sources cited, for your convenience

One-Ring Circus That Breathes Fellini

Of varying length, they involve the men and women of Les Colporteurs, notably David Dimitri with some nimble, acrobatic tightrope work, in feats of balance, swinging and twirling on ropes, being manipulated like a marionette, flying on a trapeze, clowning and juggling.

The Two-Ring Circus

During celebratory cocktails, they turned their gaze to the Zurich-based tightrope walker David Dimitri (son of the Swiss national treasure Dimitri the Clown) as he traversed a nearly invisible wire a perilous 20 feet above the backyard pond.

Daffiness and Daring In Every Last Ring

Among the daredevils are David Dimitri, the Big Apple's Juilliard-trained Lord of the Wire, who dances to Celtic strains and skips rope on the high wire;

THE FEEL OF A ONE-RING CIRCUS NYT Nov. 22, 1985

Stylistic sympathy notwithstanding, Dimitri had another reason for performing with the Big Apple this year: his 22-year-old son, David, is a member of the troupe. David Dimitri has been performing with circuses since he was 7 years old, when his partner was a llama. Now in his fourth season with the Big Apple Circus, he is thrilled to be on the same bill with his father - but as a name in his own right. I grew up with this image of my dad being very well known in Europe, David Dimitri says. It makes me very happy to be a known, solo performer here, but in the same show with him. It's my own achievement.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, and Switzerland. Shellwood (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sal Villanueva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is only mentioned in passing in the one source. Could find no sources with WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:ANYBIO/ WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Whyte III

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources only mention the subject in passing. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 4meter4 (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Christianity, New York, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources come up in Google News or Google Books; fails WP:NBIO. Notability aside, the whole article is promotional to the point of not being worth keeping. --Richard Yin (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Xenia Sackville, Lady Buckhurst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this biography of a jewellery designer with notability concerns earlier this month; now having carried out WP:BEFORE, I'm not seeing significant coverage of her in reliable sources. Most coverage is tabloid, such as this in the Daily Mail, or passing mentions in the context of her father or husband - see WP:NOTINHERITED. Note that she is mentioned variously as Xenia Sackville, Buckhurst or Tolstoy, or as Lady Buckhurst. I don't think she meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, and I can't see that there are specific categories of biographical notability she would fit into, except perhaps WP:NARTIST for her jewellery design. Tacyarg (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, United Kingdom, and England. Tacyarg (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 14:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of people from Cumbria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only links to two pages which only cover one town and one city in the whole county. This is unnecessary and the same information is widely available in categories. Thirdman (talk) 02:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and England. Heart ^(talk) 05:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Pennington (model)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass GNG - apart from one puff article seems only to have inherited notability for marriage to Shaun Cassidy Golikom (talk) 05:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Women. Heart ^(talk) 05:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Sexuality and gender, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tengku Baharuddin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see that this younger son of a Malay sultan passes WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. He does not hold any office that would be presumptively notable, and I don't see any WP:SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources (in the article or in my WP:BEFORE search) that would pass the general notability guideline. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Royalty and nobility, and Malaysia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Imakuni?

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very few sources exist actually covering this guy. The article's in a weird spot where he's technically a mascot/fictional character yet also a real person. Coverage on him is sparse regardless. In English there's very little on him in Books, News, and Scholar in the way of SIGCOV, and even in Japanese it's primarily just announcements of collaborations or promotional articles and the like. The current article is primarily subsisting on trivial mentions and primary sources, with little in the way of actual notability. A potential AtD could potentially be a merge to List of Pokémon characters, but I'm admittedly unsure given his unique status. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Fictional elements, and Video games. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Anime and manga, Advertising, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and/or merge to said list. He seems to be extremely niche and GNG-failing, based on the sources present. Heavy case of WP:FANCRUFT. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Piotrus. Fails the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Husam Zaman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not meet WP:ACADEMIC, for being a university president! Sabirkir (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Saudi Arabia. Sabirkir (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Less than 200 cites in GS fails WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Patrick Smith (Vicar of Great Paxton)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this individual passes WP:NBIO, WP:GNG. No pass on WP:NAUTHOR either; there's a published response to Smith's polemic on Quakerism but nothing else verifiable. (The Bockett letter does not appear to have been published and thus would not count as a review.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Christianity, and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Again not finding anything about him except for a short blurb of the same book you mentioned on the Quaker archives of Canada. ❤History Theorist❤ 00:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Carson

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There have already been two deletion discussions about this article in the past, so I was initially hesitant to open this. However, since the last discussion in 2015, the article collapsed from a long-winded ramble about various concepts the subject discussed (cited largely to the subject himself or other self-published sources)[1] into what is now a stub.

I tried looking around for more sources to expand it, but I found little-to-no actual information about Carson as a person. What I did find were largely reviews and analyses of his main major work "Studies in Mutualist Economics", with only passing references to his other works without any real detail.

From what I've seen, there is very little to write about for a biographical article about the subject himself, so I think this might not pass the notability guidelines for people. I do think his work "Studies in Mutualist Economics" has received enough attention for its own article (per the notability guidelines on books), but this might be another case where an author is not independently notable of their single notable work. Grnrchst (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, Economics, and United States of America. Grnrchst (talk) 15:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I simply do not see secondary coverage about him in a before search, and the keep rationales made in previous discussions don't actually convince me he's otherwise notable. SportingFlyer T·C 16:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Libertarianism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom. Yue🌙 09:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where has "Studies in Mutualist Economics" received significant reviews/discussion? If there was enough reliable sourcing for a dedicated article then it would make a good redirect target, but I don't see the reviews. czar 12:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mutualism (economic theory)#Contemporary developments where Carson's work is mentioned and his name is a relevant search term. If that article didn't mention Wilbur's paragraph on Carson I was going to recommend adding it. Carson is associated with the contemporary mutualist tradition so even if there isn't enough coverage for a dedicated biography, the section on contemporary mutualism should suffice. czar 12:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aria (Indian singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:GNG, WP:SINGER, WP:BANDMEMBER with no WP:SIGCOV for individual notability other than passing mentions from X:IN-related reportings including but not limited to her "about"-type reporting as part of X:IN's debut-related promotional reportings from WP:BEFORE. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music, South Korea, and India. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Kerala, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Varner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians. UtherSRG (talk) 12:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Has a few sources [2], [3], what appears as an album review [4]. Article needs work, it only has two interviews now. Oaktree b (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in addition to the arguments for retention made by Oaktree b, I've added sources such as this source from The Star-Ledger in New Jersey and this one from The Seattle Times on the West Coast. Both of these are examples of the in-depth coverage in reliable and verifiable sources that are available in the press that are unequivocally about him and his accomplishments. The three-word assertion for deletion made by the nominator that the article "Fails WP:MUSICBIO" seems to have been made without having done the most basic effort to search for sourcing as specified by WP:BEFORE. The general notability guideline is clearly met based on his biography as a musician, his work and the ample reliable and verifiable sources that support that claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weidner Communications

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is confusing. Is it about a marketing company, a machine translation software, or the brothers (who have last names spelled differently)? 🄻 🄰 11:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Language, Companies, Technology, and Software. 🄻 🄰 11:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@लॉस एंजिल्स लेखक: I can't identify a deletion rationale in your nomination statement. Could you please provide one, else this nomination should be closed under WP:CSK#1. This appears to be a reasonably sourced article on a company, the machine translation software it produced, and its founders, which appear to be a reasonable set of topics to cover together. ~ A412 ^talk! 16:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1 (nom has been editing, but has not provided any deletion rationale). ~ A412 ^talk! 18:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

William Lee Neal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV, does not meet WP:PERP. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 04:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So how do I begin this? Just reply here? Here's what I know about the case. Colorado newspapers covered it extensively, romanticizing the coverage. Crime fiction shows constantly derived some of their criminal from Neal, and now there's even a book on his case. Mark Pautler's moves to impersonate a defense attorney is heavily recognized across law schools. I put the focal point on Neal because the murders and rape got more coverage, while also alluding to the significance of Pautler's ethics breach and informing how Neal gained reignited attention on crime fiction without openly admitting he was the inspiration ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 04:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, Colorado, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I watch Darth Stabro's talk, so I saw this AfD. I'm currently inclined towards a weak keep because there was some sustained coverage (if not sustained to the present) in state- and nationwide RS press. I grew up in Colorado hearing about the crime. The cited book doesn't scream RS to me (an author's NYT bestseller status is not a rubber stamp of reliability across all their work). Is there more available on the Paulter angle? ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pautler's been covered repeatedly for his ethics violation across multiple newspapers. It's been used, as you can see, as inspiration for crime fiction. Issue is as many reports as there may have been, they have to be archived by now, probably in Internet Archive or Wayback Machine, because a search engine doesn't show much. But he was definitely reported on, to the point law schools conducted theses on his case.

I figured the driving force for Neal was basically his 2-part Westword coverage. Those lengthy articles don't just get made for the news, I have to agree there must've been at the very least state wide response to his crimes. I can't put his Murderpedia page here. I could maybe find info on him at death penalty info centers and databases, but I don't know how much would be presented. ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 02:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw: Upon further research, found more significant coverage than previously thought. The article definitely still needs to be pared down from its excessive level of detail, though, and have further in-text citations. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 03:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emuoboh Gbagi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a son of a minister, Special Adviser, executive assistant to Governor on any matters or to run for an unsuccessful political election do not pass the criteria for politicians. All the sources too fail WP:GNG and WP: SIGCOV cannot be established. Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Politicians, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obviously fails WP:NPOL, and WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO is not met. We don’t curate articles on topics who unsuccessfully ran for an Assembly seat, who is a special adviser, or who is a businessman who is doing nothing but his business. These pieces of are, of course, the usual opinionated and dependent pieces that lacks the substantial coverage we require to pass WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ibidapo Lawal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Out of the 35 sources used in this article, only this appears to be GNG worthy. The rest are either about his company or press releases. Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Abuyere

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All the sources are either about his company or press releases. The article was WP: REFBOMB to confer Notability and yet not notable. All the awards too are run-of-the-mills Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Wareham Leonard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This author does not appear to be a notable person. 🄻 🄰 00:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Journalism, and New Zealand. 🄻 🄰 00:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I believe 52 Men meets WP:NBOOK, with reviews in Landfall [5], Kirkus Reviews [6], Los Angeles Review of Books [7], and New Zealand Books [8]. The Missoulian (of all places) did a capsule review [9]. New Zealand Books also capsule reviewed Miss Me a Lot Of [10]. Maybe someone else can locate an additional review of Miss Me a Lot Of or an author profile -- I think that would unambiguously clear the WP:NAUTHOR bar. Jfire (talk) 02:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the WP:AUTHOR of a significant or well-known body of work. 52 Men is definitely notable, and Since You Ask was reviewed by The NZ Herald and The Rain Taxi Review of Books and won the prestigious James Jones First Novel Award. pburka (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nelly Leon-Chisen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sigcov to establish notability. Search hits are either self-published or routine references to her book. Jdcooper (talk) 15:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Plenty of passing mentions, but no solid reliable sources with significant coverage to establish notability. SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Women, and Medicine. Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh Mishra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Karate coach, no coverage in reliable sources. Declined by Bonadea see [11] and just after the decline the Draft was moved to mainspace by the creator, see [12]. Previous deletions can be checked here, [13]. Taabii (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Games, India, and Bihar. Taabii (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, smells like a bit of COI, or a vanity article. Nswix (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:BIO and looks like a vanity piece. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It does appear to be a likely COI. More importantly, I can't find what I would call significant independent coverage of him by independent sources. I found no mentions of him at the WKF website or in the results of any major adult karate competition--not Commonwealth, continental, or world championships. I see no evidence of him meeting any WP notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems like a vanity page and notability is not established as per WP:BIO or WP:SIGCOV. Lekkha Moun (talk) 07:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet WP:GNG (WP:NBIO / WP:SPORTCRIT). This article was rejected twice in the AfC process; however, the editor moved it to the mainspace regardless. QEnigma talk 14:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eric R. Gilbertson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essentially a resume. The person doesn't appear to pass general notability guidelines. A re-direct to the school is possible, but I question if having a redirect to a small school for every one of their past president is necessary. Graywalls (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following for the same reason:

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Businesspeople, and Michigan. Graywalls (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find articles about his retirement and public speaking events after that, nothing really showing notability. Primary sourcing is used in the article now, so that's not helping. Oaktree b (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep (of ERG article): It seems to me that the central question is whether C6 of WP:NPROF is met by ERG due to their having served as the president of Saginaw Valley State University and of Johnson State College (now part of Vermont State University). Since the former school offers a significant number of master's degrees and three doctorates (DNP; see https://www.svsu.edu/graduateprograms/), it seems to me that that the answer is yes. I qualify this as a weak keep because this is not an R1 university and does not appear to be historically significant. I do agree that WP:GNG is not met, and if the page is to remain it needs significant editing so as to not present as a resume. I see no way for this particular subject to satisfy the other criteria of WP:NPROF. The other page (about JMR) should be considered on its own merits; I am unsure whether we are supposed to be discussing both of them here. Qflib (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Qflib What academic accomplishments and citations does he have? that would qualify under NPROF? My position is that he doesn't qualify under "a significant accredited college or university, director of a highly regarded, notable academic independent research institute or center (which is not a part of a university), president of a notable national or international scholarly society, etc." I believe "significance" or "highly regarded" of this school is subjective and in mine, it's not. Graywalls (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Only one of the 6 criteria of NPROF need to be met in order to establish notability; please read it carefully. I specifically pointed out that I was referring only to C6 of NPROF, so academic citations are immaterial. I also specifically pointed out that "I see no way for this particular subject to satisfy the other criteria of WP:NPROF." I stand by my weak keep recommendation; if other senior editors come on here and convince me otherwise, I am open to input. Qflib (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I buy the WP:NPROF C6 rationale, as president of a mid-sized college/university. I additionally note that I found several local newspaper sources: [14][15][16]. He was involved in a minor scandal regarding a football hazing incident [17][18]. It's weak for a GNG case, but it helps support the NPROF case. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

S. Ramachandran (politician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:NPOL. The article was proposed for deletion few days ago, but the author removed it without addressing the concerns or demonstrating how the article satisfies the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Idoghor Melody (talk) 10:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and India. Idoghor Melody (talk) 10:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:S. Ramachandran is a politician who is the secretary of the Tamil Nadu unit of CPIM which is one of the only six national parties of India [This can be soon become one of the only five national parties because BSP is on the verge of losing the status]. Besides the article has some reliable sources and secondary sources and hence it meets the general notability guideline. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Besides multiple Wikipedia articles having less citations or having no citations stay on Wikipedia. But it has already 3 reliable sources and secondary sources and more can be added. An improvement tag can be added but deletion is not right. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please tag those articles, we need to review or remove them as well, that would be a help. Oaktree b (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't meet political notability, works in the party as a functionary. Sourcing is not helpful, nor can I find anything showing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom fails WP:NPOL. Poor sources with no notable coverage on the subject. The subject does not seem to warrant a biographical page because of no significant, interesting, or unusual enough coverage to deserve attention or to be recorded. RangersRus (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Omoha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source passes WP:GNG while the rest are either personal website like this, or about his foundation likethis and press releases. All the awards too are run-of-the-mills. A WP:Before showed nothing than his visitations to prominent people Ibjaja055 (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: In my opinion, there are no valid secondary sources to prove sufficient notability under WP:ANYBIO to warrant a Wiki article on the subject. Here is an excerpt from "Washington Morning", source #1 for this article, this is taken word-for-word, directly from the first line of the first paragraph: "In recents, a prominent Nigerian Newspaper Guardians released a reports edition on Nigerians business tycoons contributing to the country over 200 million population Gross Domestic Product in 2021, with the tag titled “Special Focus on 50 Most Impactful and Award Winnings CEO’s that contributed to Nigeria GDP Growth in 2021." Mamani1990 (talk) 00:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ademola Adesina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from this puff piece from Londoner's post , all the sources are either pass mentioned, interview or nothing at all. Therefore all the remaining sources fali WP:GNG and WP: SIGCOV cannot be established. Ibjaja055 (talk) 01:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Technology, Nigeria, and United Kingdom. Ibjaja055 (talk) 01:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: England, California, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. The contributor has not demonstrated WP:BURDEN sufficient notability through valid secondary sources WP:SOURCES. Mamani1990 (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Malcolm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography for an extremely WP:ROTM Presbyterian clergyman who fails WP:GNG/WP:NBIO. Two of the sources are WP:USERGENERATED photos uploaded to Commons ([19], [20]), another user-generated geneaology page ([21]), a single WP:TRIVIALMENTION in a report on the Boy Scouts ([22]), a single mention of his WWI service ([23]), and a routine brief mention in a local Presbyterian trade magazine ([24]). A WP:BEFORE search turned up no WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity, Canada, and Michigan. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There isn't really even a claim to notability in the article, just that he was an ordinary clergyman who served in World War I. Didn't find any additional sources of note. MCE89 (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources cited either aren't independent or cover him in any depth. I also couldn't find anything on the web that indicates special notability. ❤History Theorist❤ 01:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm sure that he was one of The Elect, but there are no reliable sources other than possibly the Boy Scouts. Bearian (talk) 06:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and above. Based on username it looks like the author is probably related to Malcolm. Can't find any evidence of notability. BugGhost 🦗👻 09:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Zakaria al-Jamal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Even the killing of al-Jamal doesn't meet GNG (if it did, this article would still fail under WP:BLP1E). VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 08:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Palestine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E. He is (maybe) notable only for his death which is against WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We will all die, but hopefully not by getting taken out by the IDF, along with three friends. Not memorial, run of the mill, 15 seconds of fame, original research, etc. Bearian (talk) 15:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Izin Akioya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not seem notable enough to meets WP:GNG or WP:SNG as there's limited information about her achievement or works. Ednabrenze (talk) 06:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria. Ednabrenze (talk) 06:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Absolutely nothing makes this pass WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:BASIC. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not pass any notability Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, and Women. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional crap. She doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:BASIC and her companies and book aren't notable.Ynsfial (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This fails WP:GNG; sources are promotional and not independent. Moopaz (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Heiberger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing genuine evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. A couple of brief interviews, but the rest are PR, non-independent, or passing mentions. Seems like a run of the mill businessman. —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and New York. —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd agree, a non-notable person. Re34646 (talk) 03:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with deletion, the most notability-instilling source cited is a NYT "30-minute interview" but that was part of a series of short interviews of "prominent developers, brokers, property managers and builders in New York commercial real estate", which is a specifically narrow scope and to me does not indicate that the subjects of those interviews are necessarily notable enough for WP:GNG (and is maybe even borderline non-WP:IS). Jokullmusic 05:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with deletion. This person is not notable. I would also add that it seems likely this page was originally created by Andrew himself (or a friend) as the only contributions by the original user are related to Andrew Heiberger. WP:AUTO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Craycraytevana — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiWingsuit (talk • contribs) 07:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- probably self-created promotional page, subject fails notability criteria, only main space links to the page are List of University of Michigan alumni, List of University of Michigan business alumni, List of University of Miami School of Law alumni. BabelStone (talk) 11:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there were a number of social media posts today tying the article subject to a person who complained about New York congestion pricing. See, e.g.,[25]. No idea if this will get any news coverage (not saying it should). Oblivy (talk) 13:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The coverage has begun:

NY Post, quotes and brief discussion of article subject [26]
Daily Mail, about him, coverage of the online skewering [27]
Jalopnik, about him, on the online skewering [28]

Oblivy (talk) 02:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Do not believe he's notable enough to meet WP:GNG. Ueutyi (talk) 14:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, article looks like a puff piece. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 18:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as a non-notable individual and probable vanity page. —Tim Pierce (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this seems like a vanity page and both the creator and the major contributor to this page only have activity related to this one individual associated with their accounts. The major contributions were added from a random IP address. Finally, being interviewed on the news doesn't make a person notable, otherwise my neighbor would have his own article.Photovolts (talk) 01:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dotun Ajegbile

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and significant coverage cannot be established.
source 1 is a puff and promotional piece and part of the source farming explained in source 2.
Source 2 is part of the source farming of puff and promotional pieces published in the month of November. You can check this, this, this and this that did nothing than to praise him with different unverified claims.
source 3 is a LinkedIn post.
source 4 another puff piece. Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Games, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Absolutely nothing makes this pass WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:30, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG; problem on ilc issue. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 11:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, delete it. ONLY YOU nominated all my articles, why did you omit the ones I wrote on journalism in Nigeria? please add it and delete that too. you are enemy of progress. I have nothing to gain or earn writing articles for Wikipedia. It's out of share love for reading and writing. Your malicious intents to discourage me and prospective writers is noted. you can go ahead in your evil enterprise. delete the article, there is no trophy to be won in writing articles on Wikipedia. I have nothing to gain, so please your evil conscience, delete it. Akowe1975 (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please find time to read WP:GNG, WP:N and WP:SNG and ensure that future articles meet one or more of the criteria stated there. Shoerack (talk) 20:07, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Very much PROMO for a non-notable individual, puff pieces and the usual flowery language seen in Nigerian media. Nothing found for this individual we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That guy is one of the pioneers of SPORTS BETTING BUSINESS in Nigeria. The history of sports betting in Nigeria can't be written without mentioning his name. Too bad you don't know him. Infact I WILL NEVER MAKE ANY ARTICE ON WIKIPEDIA ANY LONGER, it's just waste of efforts. WHAT PROMOTION IS WIKIPEDIA DOING FOR SOMEONE WHOSE BUSINESS IS IN NIGERIA AND EXTENDED TO GHANA? As far as im concerned, (Personal attack removed), EFFORST ARE NEVER RECOGNISED. too bad. Akowe1975 (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, please do not insult us. We tend to discount anything said in that case. Oaktree b (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
user appears to have been blocked regardless Oaktree b (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and likely COI. Watchlisted. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not have sufficient secondary sources WP:SOURCES to prove notability for WP:BIO. The WP:BURDEN has not been met here. Furthermore, the main contributor's talk page User_talk:Akowe1975 reads like that of a vandal. Mamani1990 (talk) 01:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If every page here you write is filled with sources like LinkedIn and red linked websites that nobody's heard of, then you don't know how to cite properly. If every AfD about said page is filled with defenses such as written above, then you are just going through the phases of grief experienced by many a spammer. In 2025, everyone knows that we are not a free marketing service. Bearian (talk) 06:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsley Kobayashi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources Fail Wikipedia general Notability guidelines. The first source is an interview with an unreliable blog, the second source cannot be verified though from the URL, it is also an unreliable blog. The third source is the subject's website. The fifth source is a puff piece and the last source is also the subject's website Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is pretty close to containing no assertion of notability at all so far. Dekimasuよ! 02:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, delete it. ONLY YOU nominated all my articles, why did you omit the ones I wrote on journalism in Nigeria? please add it and delete that too. you are enemy of progress. I have nothing to gain or earn writing articles for Wikipedia. It's out of share love for reading and writing. Your malicious intents to discourage me and prospective writers is noted. you can go ahead in your evil enterprise. delete the article, there is no trophy to be won in writing articles on Wikipedia. I have nothing to gain, so please your evil conscience, delete IT. Akowe1975 (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: More crypto nonsense, nothing for notability that I can find in any sources. The one source Vanguard used in the article isn't enough. Oaktree b (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable secondary sourcing to prove notability under WP:ANYBIO. One of the only sources that might be argued as "credible", from The Guardian (Nigeria), sounds a lot like ChatGPT: "In a world where business extends beyond profit, Kingsley Kobayashi’s journey exemplifies a commitment to societal well-being and a vision for a brighter, more inclusive future". I believe Brown envelope journalism might be at play here, a practice heavily entrenched in Newspapers published in Nigeria.Mamani1990 (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of significant coverage. In 2025, everyone knows the problems that Wikipedia has had with its sources. There are lots of Nigerian politicians, entertainers, and entrepreneurs who are notable, but they get into reliable sources without any payola or selling crypto. If your defense of this article is practically a quote out of WP:GRIEF, then you are not winning. Bearian (talk) 04:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Morrison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only WP:ROUTINE coverage and last years signining to Solihill Moors documented in Solihull Observer as WP:BLP1E, there is no WP:SIGCOV for WP:GNG. Note: Not to be confused with the Gaelic footballer of the same name. CNC (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Football, and England. CNC (talk) 16:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Brar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to satisfy WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage. B-Factor (talk) 14:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, and India. B-Factor (talk) 14:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable singer, going viral isn't the level of notability we need. [29] is an interview. Source 3 in the article is a list of many people, not mostly about this person. I don't see enough for notability at this time. Oaktree b (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
going viral is a context, hitting the charts across multiple countries is notability as defined by the notability guidenlines for Wikipedia Music pages. Wikpedia Music Guidelines notability also defines the release by a major record label as the current case is. There are more sources added by other users as well. G4gurpreet (talk) 09:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I found a source from The Times of India, but I'm not sure if it helps. Aona1212 (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Ramzan Ali Miya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer. No RS found. Taabii (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, and Nepal. Taabii (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Qatar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. Whilst there is over 400,000 Nepalis in Qatar, the vast majority are migrant workers and not permanent residents. Since Qatar only grants permanent residency to about 100 people a year, the percent of Nepali permanent residents could be as low as 0.025% of that. So being president of the Nepal-Qatar Friendship Association does not seem to be a good enough claim to notability. Sahaib (talk) 12:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tobi Asehinde

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources fail WP:GNG and cannot establish WP:SIGCOV of the subject. They are either puff piece, our story section, no single mention or or pass mentioned sources. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, Africa, and Nigeria. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing to establish WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: In my opinion, there is no valid secondary sourcing provided to prove notability enough to warrant a page under WP:ANYBIO. Also, BellaNaija is a fashion blog, not a newspaper. It is not practicing journalism in my view, it never seems impartial and only writes "puff" pieces. Yet this same website is listed in so many different articles that are up for deletion. Mamani1990 (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Traveen Mathew

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, who fails WP:GNG. Has only played in T10 cricket, not any FC, List A or T20 competition which can often help increase significant coverage. This article was moved to draftspace and then moved back despite minimal insufficient improvements, which is why this AFD is necessary. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Cricket, and Sri Lanka. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He has played two First Class matches, 12 List A matches and four T20 matches. He also represented Sri Lanka at the Under-19s Asian Cup. I have added more information and sources including two from The Papare which focus heavily on him. Lookslikely (Talk 18:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i have added further information and another reference which features him as the main focus and in the article title. From my reading of the GNG rules this addition, along with the ones I previously made and are mentioned above, mean this article definitely passes the required SIG COV specification. Lookslikely (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the improvements, but I'm still not convinced he is notable, so I wish to continue this AFD to get consensus. Of the sources, [30], [31] are passing mentions in tournament squad lists, [32] is one paragraph of basic stats, [33] is from SLC so not independent coverage (and so does not contribute to WP:GNG, [34] is a match report with a bit of basic information about him. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I tried. Lookslikely (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kasturi Murali Krishna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article wasn't notable and not passed on the criteria of WP:GNG, and the cite was a IMDB which is not reliable sources. Royiswariii Talk! 14:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Royiswariii Talk! 14:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Telangana. Wikishovel (talk) 14:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
strong delete No citations, page isn't ok for main Wiki. Taksoh17 (talk) 14:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This user came back from a year's absence to add badly written replies to 6 AFDs in a row. Geschichte (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not yet notable per WP:NAUTHOR, WP:BIO or WP:GNG, with no significant coverage found in reliable sources in English (Kasturi Murali Krishna or Kasturi Muralikrishna) or Telugu (కస్తూరి మురళీకృష్ణ), just passing mentions and social media. Wikishovel (talk) 14:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kasturi Murali Krishna is one of the noted contemporary writer in Telugu Language at present. Article on his name is suitable to be placed in english wikipedia. Ofcourse I am searching for reliable sources for references which may took some time. Moreover this article is available in Telugu wikipedia since 2014 and didnot considered for deletion by any administrators. స్వరలాసిక (talk) 14:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It should be considered there as well if more sources are not found Geschichte (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not a notable writer, no reliable sources found even after searching on Google. Taabii (talk) 10:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - winning some made up in one day awards for "prolific" but ultimately run of the mill writer. As noted by many editors, infomercials have taken over previously responsible media there, so sourcing about authors in India just verifies existence, but does not constitute significant coverage. On a personal note, I feel sorry for any writer or journalist in a country that routinely censors even the most anodyne material. Bearian (talk) 02:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shipra Dawar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Topic is not meeting WP:GNG. I am unable to find sufficient coverage from independent sources. This article don't have any mention about the subject. This is paid/sponsored article. This is self published. Looks like WP:COVERT. B-Factor (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Women, and India. B-Factor (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets all standard of WP:GNG. Let's take this step by step-

This article don't have any mention about the subject- The link has been updated in the original article to reference IWill GiTA as described by Microsoft.
This is paid/sponsored article.- The article was used to establish Shira's role as the founder of Bharat Bhagya Vidhata Forum. Have added reference where this has been established- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFaTi2CB4Vg. This video is by Indian School of Business's Bharti School of Public Policy.
This is self published- This was used to communicate her higher education. Additional information has been published by Zee Media.

I hope this clarifies all the doubts. Jai Mata Di 2024 (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Haryana, Punjab, Australia, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination. Does not meet WP:GNG based on adequate coverage from independent sources. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 17:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it meets WP:GNG and has adequate independent sources. Listing them below- ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4] this seems like an attack to demerit women founders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashishdwivedi76 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC) — Ashishdwivedi76 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. The clarifications from User:Jai Mata Di 2024 do not resolve the underlying issue of a lack of coverage in independent sources. The sources identified by User:Ashishdwivedi76 (who is kindly reminded to assume good faith and not denigrate other editors by implying misogyny) do not meet the threshold of WP:GNG either: the first is a Forbes contributor article (WP:FORBESCON) and the second is the same paid PR as the Business Standard article. The remaining two, from Catch News and Zee News, seem to be paid media; as noted in WP:NEWSORGINDIA, paid news (which does not count toward determining notability) is a highly pervasive and deeply integrated practice within Indian news media such that when evaluating Indian print media, we should caution in using such sources for factual claims or to establish notability, looking at the tone, language, and other factors in an article to determine if it is indeed independent coverage, not paid/PR material. The short length and highly promotional tone of the Catch News and Zee News articles leads me to believe that they are also paid PR. WhinyTheYounger ※ Talk 16:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Anyone in 2025 who comes here with arguments that YouTube, blogs, and paid news are reliable sources can't be taken seriously, sorry not sorry. Again, infomercials have taken over previously responsible media there, so sourcing about almost anything in India just verifies existence, but does not constitute significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 02:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The comments here do not address the main article. WhinyTheYounger has mentioned a citation by Catch News which has not even in the main article. Bearian has quoted reliable sources which clearly states WP:INDIANEXP is a reliable source under WP:NEWSORG, here is link to an WP:INDIANEXP article- ^[5] that states claims made by User:Jai Mata Di 2024. Indianwriter786 (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there's one reliable source. But that's not significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpa Sahu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only selected for training camp before AFC Women’s Futsal Asian Cup 2025. I didn’t found any sources which discuss the subject and this player hasn’t won any medal at international level. Fails WP:GNG as well as WP:SPORTS TheSlumPanda (talk) 11:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, India, and Assam. TheSlumPanda (talk) 11:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ramkishan Suthar

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

mostly source are seem unreliable source to me, and most of the references are obtained from blog websites and the article not meet to WP:DIRECTOR or WP:NFILMMAKER. --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 06:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 06:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability, also references are just blog or youtube video link.PQR01 (talk) 17:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sourcing is both terrible and indicative of a recent big splash. Bearian (talk) 03:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Tabish Khan (art critic)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of an art critic that fails WP:GNG, WP:NBIO. Sources in article are limited to WP:PRIMARYSOURCE WP:INTERVIEWS, WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in media coverage of other topics, primary source bios and other non-independent sources. WP:BEFORE search turns up lots of his own writing but no independent WP:SIGCOV to establish notability. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Visual arts, and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the writer is known within the contemporary art scene in the UK and is currently active suggesting there may be more additions to the page in future. While I agree that searching for the author turns up lots of his own writing, a look at other art critics, writers and journalists with Wikipedia entries returns similar results. In terms of independent coverage, this article does include links to notable outlets that have sought his views on art stories and artworks. Suggestions for improvement rather than deletion may be a better course of action. Londoneditor284 (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC) — Londoneditor284 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep these are good points. It would be a diservice to Wikipedia if well-known critics were expunged Likeabutterfly (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - although this person is mostly only known within the contemporary British art scene, they have contributed numerous articles, interviews, and features in multiple outlets and have been quoted in many sources (as can be seen from the citations). They are clearly significant enough within their own field to warrant keeping this article. Any suggestions to improve the article would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.45.218.212 (talk) 12:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC) — 80.45.218.212 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Izno (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations in sources are not enough to demonstrate notability (except in a limited case for certain academics), and authoring articles isn't either. What SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources can you offer? Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Let me do some digging and get back to you. The nature of the subject (someone who writes about other people's artwork for a living) makes it difficult by definition to have many SIGCOV sources. I feel this should be taken into account? 80.45.218.212 (talk) 16:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel this way, that's a great discussion topic for WP:VILLAGEPUMP, not for a discussion where we can't change policy. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Could Dclemens1971 help in finding any better sources for this person/article? I've looked at pages for other critics too but can't seem to see how they fit the criteria if we are super-strict with SIGCOV Likeabutterfly (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC) (striking duplicate vote. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC))[reply]
Please strike your second !vote; editors are only allowed one !vote in an AfD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the entire point of the WP:BEFORE search (which I did) was to find qualifying sources, and I didn't find them. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"[A] search turns up lots of his own writing but no independent [sources]" - isn't this exactly what we should expect though? Likeabutterfly (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's what we should expect from a person who's not notable, I suppose. And as already mentioned, please strike through your duplicative !vote. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per the nomination. Taabii (talk) 10:30, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this AFD discussion. Since there are several strong Keep arguments, I'm giving this discussion a little more time for supporters to locate RS that provide SIGCOV. If nothing appears, then I assume this article will be headed towards deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Sofie Madsen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline notability, subject requests deletion,Ticket:2024091410007147. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Fashion. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Do you have any details on the VRT request, CaptainEek? Any reason for why they would be against the article? Since nothing in it seems negative. And I would not call her borderline notable, since she's one of the biggest names in fashion. It's just that the coverage of her is almost entirely not in English. But outside of most every fashion magazine in the world covering her, she also receives mainstream coverage from newspapers of record. For example:

So I'd really like some more information on this one before making a decision. Because I'm currently leaning toward too notable and well known for WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE to matter. Silver seren^C 01:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Silver seren The issue seems to be one of inaccuracy and the sources being out of date; most of them are over a decade old. I made a few corrections to the article, but her overall concern is that the article is now so out of date with her resume that potential employers google her and think her CV is fake because her more recent achievements are not on her Wikipedia. I think this is a problem we often encounter with BLP's: their article is frozen in time at a point when they had coverage, and doesn't reflect who they are now, but there isn't enough new coverage to update with. A problem that grows as Wikipedia reaches the 25 year mark. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 01:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like an argument for expansion, not for deletion. Unless we're going to be deleting a ton of articles for being out of date. There's sources available. There's this from Vogue on her Tokyo 2017 collection. There's this from Women's Wear Daily on her Paris 2018 collection. There's this from Woman.dk and this from Fashion Forum about her 2021 collection collaboration with Lulu Kaalund. I got all that from just a quick Google search without even knowing anything about how to search for Danish, French, or Japanese sources. Silver seren^C 01:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the VRT agent for that ticket, and CaptainEek's characterization is correct. She has provided only vague objections about things being incorrect, nothing specific. I have asked her to use WP:Edit Request Wizard to identify specific things to fix on the talk page, but she seems to want a VRT agent to do the research and fix things for her. The creator of the article even invites people to contact her directly and includes her email on her user page, but the article subject has not engaged with her. Yes, the subject of the article wants it deleted because she isn't famous, but the sources already cited suggest she's clearly notable, which isn't the same thing as fame. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So the argument on her end is more of the "not a celebrity level fame", rather than the "rather well known designer in a field level fame" that she actually is, it seems. I still think this is fully fixable in the article, though it would definitely be helpful if she was willing to work with us on that. Since I'm sure she's more personally aware of the fashion news sources covering her more recent work than any of us are. Silver seren^C 02:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Denmark. Shellwood (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have received an email from the subject and have asked for further details. At this stage, I am not sure if she would prefer deletion or correction.--Ipigott (talk) 09:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion would be an option if she was borderline notable or the article was a hit job, but neither case applies here. The notability seems pretty clear, and the article isn't negative either. If an article about a notable subject is deleted, someone else will eventually come along and write another article. Improvement is really the best past forward. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: She is a notable fashion designer and has coverage in reliable sources such as Vogue. Moopaz (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Fashion deigner covered by Vogue and other sources listed above. I added the "Update" template to the top of the article, saying "Please help update this article to reflect recent events ..." So, if "potential employers google her" and find this article, they will be greeted with a note making clear the article does not reflect recent events. I hope that helps. Asparagusstar (talk) 03:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: before I would go along with a keep, I would like to see the sources found incorporated into this article. This is my personal opinion, and I've raised it before in other AfDs. Bearian (talk) 04:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to hear from more editors and if you have found sources, please mention them here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Anderson (model)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refunded after soft deletion. All the sourcing on this fashion model is over-the-top promotional material, nearly all un-bylined, in sources of questionable independence and reliability (examples: Isaac Anderson 3000 is the modern Renaissance man, blending intellect, sustainability, and fashion into a tapestry that feels revolutionary yet timeless and Isaac Anderson is celebrated not only as a fashion icon but also as a trailblazer who has redefined the fashion landscape.) In my WP:BEFORE search, I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV in independent, secondary, reliable sources and so I don't see a pass of WP:GNG (much less WP:NMODEL). Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Fashion, and Ghana. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — @Dclemens1971.This sounds like a target to me though I might be wrong . I was doing some checks and I realized you’re the same editor that did that first nomination. The reason for both nominations are the same. For the first nomination I completely agree as the reasons as at that time was valid but I have a problem with this one. “All sources are over-the top promotional” this is not true if you check all the sources. One source was even talking about a scam call, how’s a scam call promotional for a model? Secondly you said nearly all unbylined. This is also not true. I can see only one source unbyline(the first source). For the promotional words you wrote , yes true it sounds promotional but even that that’s the conclusion of the article and the promotional is not throughout every article as you stated. You also said the sources’ independence is questionable. In a discussion by experienced editors about countries which are affected by system bias , some these sources were discussed. This is the link , https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Source_guide_discussions/Ghana & https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Nigeria/Nigerian_sources . The subject has been featured in a notable show(CBS morning show). I think it should be included in the English Encyclopedia. Maconzy3 (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the content in my BEFORE search, most of which was unbylined. But multiple sources in the article are indeed unbylined. Here's my source analysis:
Vanguard. No byline. Highly promotional.

Modern Ghana. Bylined but also highly promotional. This reads like marketing, not an independent, reliable news outlet. The author appears to have written only this article for Modern Ghana, so is likely not to be a reporter or a legitimate journalist.

PeaceFM. No byline. Promotional. Appears to be based entirely on quotes from Anderson.

Pulse. Bylined, but very promotional, by an "journalist" whose entire oeuvre appears to consist of spam.

CBS News. This is an article about Anderson's brother with a three-sentence WP:TRIVIALMENTION of Isaac Anderson.

GhanaCelebrities.com. An unreliable celebrity gossip blog.

Graphic.com.gh. Another puff piece.
Perhaps this is the discussion you meant to link? Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Nigerian_newspapers. It makes clear that the Nigerian sources list of the WikiProject is questionable. Either way, all we have on Anderson are puff pieces, unbylined or by writers with sketchy credentials, or articles that mention him trivially. No independent and reliable SIGCOV. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
About bylined and unbylined. You can only say multiple if it’s two or more. Only one which is vanguard Nigeria is Unbylined. For PeaceFM it’s at the buttom. It shows it’s from Isaac Anderson/Peacefm. So definitely an interview reporting but it is not promotional. The vanguard news has a promotional tone for that I agree. You said modernghana.com has a questionable independence, I’d advice you do research on things you’re not familiar with. Modernghana is one of the biggest news sites in Ghana although their reliability in this discussion (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Source_guide_discussions/Ghana ) is unclear. Even that I agree that it has a promotional tone but not marketing but I think educating you previously was important. The CBS news was only used to verify the subject’s education as it was mentioned. The Graphic newspaper is state owned newpaper that is considered generally reliable according to this (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Source_guide_discussions/Ghana ) . You also shared a link to a discussion. The discussion was about Nigerian sources not Ghanaian. The only Nigerian source here is Vanguard. I agree with you on few things but your generalization and exaggeration is making it hard for me to agree completely. I think some sources should be removed but I still stand that on my point that the article should be kept. Maconzy3 (talk) 05:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I read the PeaceFM attribution of "Source" to Anderson to be the photos of Anderson, but if you're saying that Isaac Anderson wrote that piece, it's even less eligible to demonstrate notability since it's not remotely independent. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nominator's reason and source analysis. Ibjaja055 (talk) 08:28, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Just noting that Soft Deletion is not an option as the article has been to AFD before and there is a Keep vote (yes, from a sock but it wasn't evading a block at the time).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Still the flowery language in sources, "emerging force in the fashion world" [35]... With no coverage, likely hasn't emerged far enough yet... Delete for PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Promotional article without independent significant coverage. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 03:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kioumars Pourhashemi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to be that important. All references are in passing or about his death, probably can be mentioned as a section in 2024 Battle of Aleppo Ladsgroup^overleg 17:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I made this article because I believe he was an important figure in a very important event that led to the downfall of Syria. History is important. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Iran. Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can be considered as a soldier killed in action. He is merely a member of the IRGC forces involved in the 2024 Battle of Aleppo, but not a key member. Jeeputer ^Talk 17:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - on one hand, his rank of Second brigadier general (Iran) does not automatically pass WP:MIL, but he was not an ordinary soldier. On the other hand, he did get WP:SIGCOV in the Jerusalem Post and other reliable media. Bearian (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep(?) Quoting from this page: "Researchers Hassan Hassan and Michael Weiss argued that Pourhashemi's death -along with a number of other senior officers- greatly contributed to the collapse of the loyalist defenses of Aleppo." Sounds like a credible claim to lasting significance, though it depends on how much is being carried by the "other senior officers". Koopinator (talk) 09:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 19:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Raghuraj Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Freedom activists are not inherently notable. The subject fails WP:ANYBIO, no indication of WP:SIGCOV or notable contributions to the independence movement. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, History, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:NPOLITICIAN as a member of the United Provinces Legislative Council, a precursor to the modern-day Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council. From this PhD thesis, "Kiriti Vardhan is the scion of Mankapur royal estate, and he is the fifth-generation representative of a powerful family which had direct influence in the district’s politics even before independence. His great-great grandfather Raja Raghuraj Singh and great grandfather Raja Ambikeshwar Pratap Singh won elections for the provincial assembly (of the United Provinces) in 1920s and 1930s." [36] This article from the Pioneer Mail in 1923 seems to confirm that he was a member of the provincial legislature.[37] ⁂CountHacker (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would also point out that if the article is kept, it should be moved to Raghuraj Singh per WP:TITLESINTITLES. Raja seems to be his title as the Raja of Mankapur, not part of his actual name. ⁂CountHacker (talk) 04:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Krishna Bantawa

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV as per Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!}. Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, Hong Kong, and Nepal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rahmatula786,

I hope this message finds you well.

Thank you for raising concerns about the article on Ram Krishna Bantawa. I firmly believe the article meets the requirements outlined in Wikipedia’s WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV guidelines. Below is an explanation supporting this assertion:

Notability as an Author (WP:NAUTHOR):

Ram Krishna Bantawa is a recognized author and lyricist in Nepali literature. He is known for his novel Saghan Tuwanlo (Shrill Mist) and novel Amalai Chithi (Letter to Mother-whose English translation is forthcoming.) His work has made a significant cultural impact, particularly within the Nepali community.
His lyrics and songs are available on platforms such as YouTube.
Saghan Tuwanlo is included in the curriculum of Tribhuvan University, highlighting its academic and cultural significance.His novels address meaningful societal issues such as women’s rights, untouchability, and Sati Pratha (the practice of widow immolation), further emphasizing his contributions to literature and social discourse.

Significant Coverage (WP:SIGCOV):

Independent and reliable media outlets, including Kantipur, Annapurna Post, and various Hong Kong-based Nepali newspapers, have provided coverage of Bantawa’s work. This demonstrates his influence in Nepali literature and music.
He has been featured in interviews and podcasts that delve into his life, literary contributions, and societal impact, providing further evidence of significant independent coverage.
Bantawa has received several awards and certificates from reputable organizations, including:Nepalese Literary Academy Hong Kong , Heavenly Path Hong Kong , Charu Sahitya Pratisthan , Hong Kong Nepalese Federation , Lyricist Association of Nepal

The article references independent and verifiable sources that discuss Ram Krishna Bantawa’s work in detail. Taken collectively, these factors satisfy the standards for inclusion in Wikipedia under WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV.

If additional information or sources are required to further support this assertion and enhance the article, I would be happy to assist.

Best regards, Rasilshrestha (talk) 09:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I feel you know the person very well so you are aware of so many information. When i search on internet , I hardly find anything of significance covered in reputable media outlet about him .

regarding references, plz go through all the references, and let me know if a single source in reputable Nepali media from NPOV meeting WP criteria. If your have such sources plz put it here other than what you have kept in references. Plz note that sources in reference are not of significance. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rahmatula786,

Thank you for your message. I want to clarify that I do not personally know the person. The information I’ve provided is based solely on my research.

I understand your concerns regarding the importance of meeting Wikipedia's notability criteria. Unfortunately, there is limited online information due to the lack of archived articles in Nepali media. However, I have collected pictures of old newspaper articles about the author, including coverage from Nepali Hong Kong newspapers during a book launch press meet.

I believe the article is written from a neutral point of view. While I cannot attach the offline sources here, I’d be happy to share them via email. Additionally, I can provide relevant YouTube(https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Ram+Krishna+Bantawa) links of his Songs, Interviews. Please let me know how you’d like to proceed.

I look forward to your guidance and support, as I am currently gathering resources and information for my next article of Nepali Singer "Kuma Sagar" . Your insights will be invaluable in helping me refine my work. Please let me know how best to proceed.

Best Regards, Rasilshrestha (talk) 07:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia's guidelines, contributors are discouraged from writing about individuals they personally know to maintain neutrality and avoid conflicts of interest. I can assure you that I have no personal connection with, nor do I know, the author.

In my case, I refrained from including details about the author's awards and certificates, as I was unsure about their accuracy and could not verify them through reliable sources all i had were photographs of certificates and some mentions in newspapers. However, I conducted thorough research and included information about the author's books, song lyrics, and album, as these are well-documented and publicly available.

I can provide you with ISBN of the books they were published through Sajha Publications and ASIA 2000 Ltd. Also you can search in youtube for his songs and interviews. I can additionally provide you with offline sources(Newspaper Articles, Magazines) relating to the author. Rasilshrestha (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - there appears to be some sourcing not available easily online (the "surface" of the Internet). I'm going for a dive. Bearian (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I searched under three different names for this author and his book, Shrill Mist. I also reached out to a Nepalese friend. I've come up with zero reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 02:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,

Thank you for letting me know.I am actively working on gathering reliable links and additional information to support it. I’ll share them in refrence of the article.

The reason your friend might not have found information about the novel could be because it is an older work, first published in 2008. The author is not as widely recognized as prominent Nepali literary figures like Parijat, Laxmi Prasad Devkota, or Bhanubhakta Acharya, whose biographies are included in school curriculum. Additionally, the novel hasn’t been published online, limiting its accessibility to a broader audience. However, I’ve heard that the author’s new book is being published or translated into English, which might bring more attention to their work.

It’s also worth noting that the author has spent a significant amount of time outside Nepal, particularly in Hong Kong. If you search for his name on YouTube, you’ll find his songs, which might provide some additional context.

For now, I can provide the ISBN number of the book or any other available details. I’m actively working on finding more reliable sources and digging through news archives to provide further information Rasilshrestha (talk) 03:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I have posted the photos of news archive i have clicked (Ram Krishna Bantawa News Articles : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive) in archive.org Rasilshrestha (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the link to external site as Ram Krishna Bantawa News Archive. Rasilshrestha (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is an unbolded Keep here and a previous visit to AFD which means that Soft Deletion is not an option. It usually all comes down to sources so a source analysis of what is present in the article would be helpful at this point.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment.

Ref 1 : non neutral source ( media with no reputation has review of some book not a notable work , no findings on search on internet )

Ref 2 & 3 - not active link, neither found on google

Ref 4 - not at all a media of even minor entity

Ref 5&6 - he attends book inauguration program ( that’s all . Just his name mentioned)

Ref 7. Controversial piece about some legal issues being taken. Doesn’t support the article in any sense.

Rest sources - all are either repetition of above news or your tube material or some small contributions not covered in any genuine source. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shalabh Gupta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NBLP.
Sources provided (in order):

(1): Business Daily: A puff piece on the subject, who seems to be being interviewed for this; not an independent source.
(2): Mifeed: The title says “Blazing Trails In Biotech”, need I say more? Same as above. Published in the same week as the above source and another puff piece on the subject, who seems to be being interviewed for this; not an independent source.
(3): Company website: Primary source, as this is the company's own site. Self-published content.
(4): LA Harbor News: I am unable to visit the site and therefore cannot vet this. My browser tells me this is an unsafe site. Visit at your own direction.
(5): Founders Network: This is another primary source, as it is self-published. Details are taken from an event hosted via EventBrite here.

Nyxion³⁰³ 💬 Talk 00:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nyxion³⁰³ 💬 Talk 00:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Medicine, Technology, Uttar Pradesh, California, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you for your feedback on this. Is the main issue with the sources? I'll look for some more. What do you think about the article itself? I think he's an interesting subject. When I saw that he was the first person to work on Wall Street and being a physician at the same time, he caught my attention. I thought that might count as noteworthy and interesting enough to be included in the encyclopedia. Thanks SilverhairedHarry (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Hi, thank you for replying on here. The sources are, of course, a huge concern as they fail to meet WP:RS. The individual mentioned in the article also fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NBLP, I was unable to find anything online that we can consider notable. Being a physician on Wall St. wouldn't inherently make him notable, unfortunately. Nyxion³⁰³ 💬 Talk 19:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need more participation, source assessment and arguments for what should happen with this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Naftali Schiff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The article reads a lot like a CV. The piece "Rabbi Naftali Schiff: Aish UK's wonderwall" by The Jewish Chronicle might be one source that counts towards notability, but other than that, I haven't been able to find much. Mooonswimmer 15:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Judaism, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Thanks for the nomination -- I had thought about AfDing this article when originally creating Josef Lewkowicz. Most of the sources currently in the article are poor, and it needs a WP:TNT. But there are multiple, in-depth profiles in the Jewish Chronicle and Jewish News over the years [38], [39], [40], multiple=page coverage in a book [41], with additional coverage of Schiff role in his charities [42], [43], [44], that could suffice for notability. Longhornsg (talk) 16:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Israel and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a professional at work. Misses the bar of the GNG. gidonb (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources provided by Longhornsg. Whizkin (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robert W. Faid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reliable sources mentioning Faid only mention him for a single thing: his theory that Mikhail Gorbachev is the Antichrist, for which he received the satirical Ig Nobel Prize. Here are three such sources; note that the third has merely a passing mention:

Levine, Art (June 4, 1988). "THE DEVIL IN GORBACHEV". Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 5, 2022. Retrieved December 29, 2024.
Abrahams, Marc (May 10, 2004). "Devilish digits". The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved December 29, 2024.
Whisker, Daniel (July 2012). "Apocalyptic Rhetoric on the American Religious Right: Quasi-Charisma and Anti-Charisma". Max Weber Studies. 12 (2): 159–184 – via JSTOR. The periodic modification of the specific signs of prophetic fulfilment is a key feature of the discourse: no-one now presents Mikhail Gorbachev as a potential Antichrist, as did Robert Faid in 1988 (Faid 1988), or the Native Americans as Antichrist's army, as did Cotton Mather in 1693 (Boyer 1992).

In its current state, the article contains information far beyond this single thing. This information is either completely unsourced or copied verbatim, in what I assume is a copyright violation, from Faid's obituary on Legacy.com, an unreliable source which hosts user-generated content and nonsensically claims that Faid "held the honor of being in the top ten nuclear scientists until 1975".

In my opinion, this single thing for which Faid is known is not enough to make him notable. Instead, this information, along with the three sources above, would be better suited as a part of a different article, perhaps List of conspiracy theories § Antichrist or Faid's entry at List of Ig Nobel Prize winners § 1993. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk – edits) 22:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk – edits) 22:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or merge to List of Ig Nobel Prize winners § 1993. Also add more info in the target page about his Antichrist theories, the one thing reliable sources confirm about him.

JekyllTheFabulous (talk) 23:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Military, Christianity, Engineering, Maryland, and South Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The entire Biography section was all but a direct copy from his 2008 Baltimore Sun obituary - and has been since April 2009. I've removed the copyvio text and RD1'd the article history. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above discussion, although I'm not opposed to a redirect. Bearian (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neeraj Doneria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable BLP. Lacks significant coverage Wp:SIGCOV in multiple independent WP:INDEPENDENT reliable sources WP:RS. Zuck28 (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Hinduism, and India. Shellwood (talk) 13:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Leader of an organization with over 10 million members. (As per India TV https://www.indiatvnews.com/uttar-pradesh/bajrang-dal-neeraj-doneria-claims-its-members-saved-86-lakh-cows-from-being-slaughtered-love-jihad-against-hindu-woman-muslim-up-news-2023-05-28-873040) 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 04:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: He is national convener, but not the leader (ping LordVoldemort728) who's the president of BD -- currently (?) Pravin Togadia [45]. Doneria appears to have no personal sigcov, and his only appearance elsewhere currently is at the BD article in its infobox as the organisation's head, which should be corrected. It may even be that not every past president of BD meets notabity requirements (ref WP:NOTINHERITED and the table at the article), though clearly many do. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Being a convenor of any Notable organisation does not contribute to Notability of any individual. Taabii (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Fails notability. RangersRus (talk) 13:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jim_Leisy

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Jim Leisy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe Jim Leisy fails the WP:GNG criteria. Not enough independent secondary sourcing to prove notability.

The majority of the article is unsourced self-promotion. According to the one reference in the article the artist won a 'Caldera Gold Spot Award' but I can find no explanation of what that is or how notable it might be. He also has a work catalogued by the Smithsonian https://www.si.edu/object/solar-eclipse:nasm_A20170021000 that was gifted by the artist.

Additionally, there appears to be WP:COI from Leisy himself, creating the page in the first place, removing other editors' issue taggs without fixing issues, and multiple edits of the page under User:Jimleisy.

SallyRenee (talk) 12:19, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Photography, and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 13:05, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing in the Getty ULAN [46], nor much of any mention for a photographer with this name. Nothing in the article shows notability. I don't find any book reviews. Oaktree b (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The COI editing doesn't help, but the subject has been deceased for a decade, I don't really think it matters much at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 19:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have added two references. Leisy meets WP:PHOTOGRAPHER, in particular point 4D: the person´s work has been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. The Smithsonian, the Portland Art Museum, among others.Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Works represented in the Smithsonian, Portland Art Museum, and 'National Air and Space Museum' were all gifted by the artist, apart from one at Portland that I could find that was intentionally purchased with funds provided by the Photography Council (Leisy was on the board of directors - so there's clear WP:COI there): http://www.portlandartmuseum.us/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record;id=70706;type=101 SallyRenee (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The works may have been donated by the author but the guideline Wikipedia:Notability (people) does not make a distinction between purchased and donated works, so that is not a relevant argument. By the way, it is not at all easy to donate work to museums. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I am leaning towards delete but not iVoting until I look deeper. I understand the nominator's thoughts about self-donated works in collections, however many institutions would still run a donated work through their acquisitions board; however in the case of the Portland Community College Collection, it's doubtful if they have one. The work in the Houston MFA seems to be donated by another person. The LensScratch article is a good source, however more like that are needed to meet NARTIST and GNG. A GoogleBook search found nothing. Netherzone (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - After searching more, I think there is enough for him to meet notability standards. Here's what I found online: a comprehensive obituary: [47], article in LensScratch: [48], a comprehensive narrative about his work in the collection of the Smithsonian's Air & Space Museum [49], he's quoted here as an expert: [50]. These items along with the permanent collections (even tho several were donations by the artist), [51], however the work at the Portland Community College Collection was not donated by him [52], and has a decent narrative: [53]. The COI content or unsourced self-promo can be trimmed from the article; I think he meets notability, not in the strongest sense, but I do think he is notable. Netherzone (talk) 15:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Barker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has existed for 18 years without a single source which is actually about the actor, and I can't find any sources that are actually about her, as opposed to her being mentioned in articles about her father. Black Kite (talk) 11:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers. Black Kite (talk) 11:10, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~OK to delete (and recommend deletion rather than redirect, as there are other people with the same name who may be more notable).~~ There actually are more negative reviews of the play her father wrote for her, like "Daddy's girl could do without his help" in The Financial Times. But these are arguably not really about her (the FT review says things like "on this terrain it is hard to judge how good an actress she is"), and otherwise she is mentioned in passing in her father's obituaries and articles about her fugitive brother facing child porn charges. Does not meet WP:GNG. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no major roles, nor even supporting roles. Very minor roles in one well-reviewed film and a few guest spots on TV. Bearian (talk) 03:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article says "As an actress she worked mostly in theatre", but gives no details, apart from the play Mum. It's not hard to find reviews of her stage work in digitised newspapers - I will add info and references and then consider whether she meets WP:BIO or WP:BASIC. RebeccaGreen (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes it's kinder to delete. But I will bite and expand the article and let everyone else decide. (Perhaps there are 5k pageviews in the last month for a reason.) Cielquiparle (talk) 12:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cielquiparle There is a TikTok "influencer" with the same name. Black Kite (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Plus everyone else with the same name, like the Director of Film Restoration at Paramount Pictures. Cielquiparle (talk) 17:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to give Cielquiparle and RebeccaGreen a chance to dig up more sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Two of us have now added information and sources to this article, which demonstrates that she does meet WP:GNG. There are plenty of reviews of her stage appearances, with significant, positive mentions about her ability and performances. She had major roles in Stepping Out in the West End and Nice Girls in Newcastle, and in several other professional performances of notable plays in Derby, Newcastle, Chester, etc, for which she received very positive reviews (I have not included quotes about all her performances here). There are articles about her (eg here and here) - they do mention her father, but they are about her, not him. No, she did not star in films or TV shows, but WP:NACTOR specifically states "The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions;" (my emphasis). RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Westballz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Top esports player who lacks significant coverage to prove notability. The profiles from Red Bull and ESPN are a good start, but the rest are either web articles of questionable reliability or independence (theScore eSports, EventHubs, G2 Esports) or routine coverage of changes in teams / sponsorships. Bridget (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Video games, and California. Bridget (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - These two ESPN sources [54], [55], the Red Bull source [56], as well as published unauthorized biography [57] probably pushes the subject over the edge in terms of notability. 14:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Pbrks, were you able to find more info about the book or its author and publisher? The lack of info makes it look a bit suspect, and the blurb isn't too useful. Bridget (talk) 14:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG per above, this pretty clearly gets the article over the line.

Noah ^💬 23:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ghazi Shahzad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NPOL since he never won an election, nor does he satisfy WP:GNG, the Anadolu source within the article describes his as "a little-known politician." Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Crime, Law, Politics, Terrorism, and Pakistan. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fail to meet WP:GNG criteria (WP:ANYBIO / WP:NPOL. Limited WP:RS and WP:IS for WP:V. This article is supposed to be WP:BLP. Note: Ghazi Shahzad is a little-known politician ... which question the notability of the article. QEnigma talk 17:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This AfD occurs after User:SheriffIsInTown blanked the (sourced) article and then tried to delete it under WP:BLPPROD claiming it was unsourced. The claim of being a "little-known politician" was also added by SheriffIsInTown just prior to initiating this AfD. Perhaps the result should be a delete but the discussion should not be based on SheriffIsInTown's prejudicial edits. See [58] for the article as it was before SheriffIsInTown started editing to make it worse and then use its badness as an excuse for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@David Eppstein Since when removing unsourced content from a BLP content considered "making it worse"? Anadolu source describes the individual as "a little known politician", would you prefer to keep the version which had a lot of unsourced content and rest a total misrepresentation of the sources. I blanked the article because it was a total WP:BLPVIO, I tried to PROD because I wanted to save every one a hassle of an AfD but you saw it as bad faith, really? Also, I have no issue if you want to take time to improve the article and properly source it. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Blanking a sourced article and then saying that because you blanked the sources it should be deleted for having no sources: is that a good-faith attempt to determine whether the article is notable and should be improved or deleted? Editing the first sentence of the article to directly say that the subject is non-notable, and then using that statement of non-notability as the basis for a deletion discussion: is that a good-faith attempt to determine whether the article is notable and should be improved or deleted? As I said, perhaps the article should be deleted. But your actions attempting to get it deleted make it appear that you have predetermined to delete it and are trying any way you can to ram it through, rather than allowing the community to make a fair decision. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@David Eppstein I should have adjusted the content according to the sources which I did after you removed the PROD tag, I made a mistake to blank it, I thought it was a good idea to do as the lede as well was not sourced and I saw it as a WP:BLPVIO, the presence of the sources within article does not mean that content is actually according to those sources but anyway I will shut up and allow the community to make a decision. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:21, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In English alone there seems to have been more than passing mentions of Shahzad since 2023: described as the head of Tehreek-e-Azaadi Jammu and Kashmir, widespread coverage of his gaol break in June 2024 [59], [60], [61], coverage of attempts to recapture him in November 2024. He was also a candidate in the 2021 Azad Kashmir legislative elections (which by itself is not an indicator of notability, yes, yes), but is likely to mean there's some local coverage of him in Urdu or Kashmiri. Appears to me there should be a merge/redirect AtD here. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Tehreek-e-Azaadi Jammu and Kashmir. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep or Selectively merge and redirect from the last good version of this article. Bearian (talk) 04:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Tehreek-e-Azaadi Jammu and Kashmir using sourced information from the existing article also drawing on the sources mentioned by Goldsztajn. Suggest that {{R with possibilities}} should be used for the redirect as it seems that more sources might come to light so as to make the subject notable in their own right. SunloungerFrog (talk) 11:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Faris Al-Hammadi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not meet WP:GNG. The article fails to demonstrate any proof of notability and relies heavily on sources from social media platforms such as X, Instagram, and LinkedIn, which are generally not considered reliable. The few non-social media sources included are either trivial mentions or lack the depth and significance required to establish notability.

Based on my research, and after conducting a WP:BEFORE, I could not find independent, reliable sources that provide in-depth coverage of the subject. While the individual is a social media influencer with a large following, this alone does not suffice to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 08:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 08:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and United Arab Emirates. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fail to meet WP:GNG (WP:ANYBIO / WP:CREATIVE). Available sources fail to support WP:V. QEnigma talk 13:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The current sourcing by the author is a major issue, but the subject seems to have relevant prominence with 750k+ followers. Per WP:BEFORE, subject also appears to be related to Hussain Al Hammadi and other UAE gov operatives. OrebroVi (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to point out that, per WP:INVALIDBIO, notability is not inherited. A subject's relationship with notable individuals or entities doesn't automatically make them notable. According to the notability guideline, notability is determined by significant, independent, and reliable coverage of the subject, not follower counts.

If you or another editor can provide reliable sources showing significant coverage, the article may be reconsidered. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ML Lather

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:NBIO, no significant coverage about him in sources. Being a former DGP does not make one inherently notable. - Ratnahastin (talk) 06:59, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Police, Haryana, and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RJ Sarithiran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR, trivial coverage and passing mentions in media. There are zero sources that provide WP:SIGCOV to this personality. Nxcrypto Message 13:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. Nxcrypto Message 13:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 92.7_Big_FM#RJ_Talent: listed there (mispelled) but not opposed to Keep as his last 2 roles in notable productions seem significant enough,,thus having him meet the minimum requirements for actors. -Mushy Yank. 02:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Known for his YouTube pranks [62]. Lacking in terms of sourcing. Film roles don’t seem noteworthy, just passing mentions. DareshMohan (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films and stage performances, Passes WP:NACTOR. Also The subject has made unique contributions to a field of entertainment. Sources are Secondary which provide the most objective evidence of notability. Meets WP:SIGCOV. Tiger-in-Action (talk) 06:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:VAGUEWAVE at policies will not help your case. "Also The subject has made unique contributions to a field of entertainment." What? Nxcrypto Message 07:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Poor sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. No significant and noteworthy achievement by the subject's role as an actor to warrant a page on Wikipedia. RangersRus (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Putra Adhiguna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find any independent coverage of this BLP. The 15 sources cited in the article are author listings, biography listings, interviews, articles written by the subject, alumni listings, coverage from events, seminars, conferences, summits and more interviews. It is unclear what makes the subject notable or what their contributions are which could be used to assess whether any SNG is met. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Finance, Economics, Technology, Asia, and Indonesia. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No WP:SIGCOV in the sources. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 23:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear editor, this below is planned to be add to outline his contribution to the energy transition field. Look forward to your advice whether this will be sufficiently relevant. Thank you.

Putra has made notable contributions to research on Southeast Asia's energy transition. His research expertise spans various aspects of the energy transition, including in outlining the key enablers and challenges for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology application (1), critical transition minerals sourcing and related industrial developments (2), as well as key factors to drive Indonesia’s energy transition (3)(4).

His perspectives on the energy sector have been regularly featured in major news outlets in the region, covering wide-ranging topics in energy such as gas investments in Southeast Asia (5), Singapore’s clean energy imports (6), and regional green energy cooperation in ASEAN (7).

His research works have also been cited in publications such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) report on Enhancing Indonesia’s Power System (8), RAND Corporation report on China’s Role in the Global Development of Critical Resources (9) and an article in Communications Earth & Environment journal (A part of Nature journal) titled The viability of co-firing biomass waste to mitigate coal plant emissions in Indonesia (10)

He was part of the team of international peer reviewers for the IEA report titled An Energy Sector Roadmap to Net Zero Emissions in Indonesia (11) and his insights and contribution has been acknowledged in International Institute for Sustainable Development publication titled Boom and Bust: The fiscal implications of fossil fuel phase-out in six large emerging economies (12)

(1) https://ieefa.org/resources/carbon-capture-southeast-asian-market-context-sorting-out-myths-and-realities-cost

(2) https://energyshift.institute/work/0-4-of-global-battery-production-capacity-indonesias-battery-and-ev-developments-are-far-out-of-step-with-its-nickel-exploitation-promise/

(3) https://ieefa.org/resources/indonesia-wants-go-greener-pln-stuck-excess-capacity-coal-fired-power-plants

(4) https://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Indonesias-Biomass-Cofiring-Bet_February-2021.pdf

(5) https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/gas-investments-in-se-asia-undermine-green-energy-climate-push-report

(6) https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/st-explains-s-pore-announced-more-ambitious-clean-import-targets-what-would-this-mean-for-our-energy-transition

(7) https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/583121

(8) https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/247b5328-2cd7-4fbb-a800-dd1c71f6e562/EnhancingIndonesiasPowerSystem.pdf

(9) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA2000/RRA2096-1/RAND_RRA2096-1.pdf

(10) https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01588-0

(11) https://www.iea.org/reports/an-energy-sector-roadmap-to-net-zero-emissions-in-indonesia

(12) https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2022-07/fossil-fuel-phase-out-briics-economies.pdf

**Viewpoints and research

*Carbon Capture and Storage*

Putra’s view on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology is that it will not be easily deployed in cost-sensitive regions such as Southeast Asia (13). However, more affluent countries, such as Singapore or Japan, might be interested in exporting their carbon dioxide emissions to countries that can provide storage locations (14). Nevertheless, he advocated that such export activities will require stringent standards with clear long term liability agreements (15) (16).

(13) https://ieefa.org/articles/widespread-adoption-carbon-capture-utilization-and-storage-technologies-south-east-asia

(14) https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapore-japan-sign-agreement-to-collaborate-on-carbon-capture-and-storage-tech

(15) https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Japan-cannot-make-CO2-disappear-just-by-exporting-it

(16) https://www.thejakartapost.com/business/2024/05/27/new-rules-set-to-kick-start-japanese-co2-exports-to-ri.html

*Critical Minerals for the Energy Transition*

His research on critical minerals primarily focused on nickel development and the battery and electric vehicle industry (2). He has advocated for more ambitious industrial developments to further enhance the role of producing countries in the battery and electric vehicle value chain (2).

Putra has also raised significant concerns about the low social and environmental standards of nickel development in Indonesia, including its implications for indigenous populations (17) and the potential use of forced labour (18). He has urged the government to conduct transparent assessments and implement improvements in these areas, as he outlined in his interviews with BBC News and Voice of America (17) (18).

(17) https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c1e5x2k7kp8o

(18) https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/amerika-serikat-masukkan-nikel-indonesia-ke-daftar-pekerja-paksa-/7816453.html

His expertise on critical minerals in Southeast Asia is evident from his interviews featured in prominent international publications such as The New York Times (19), Barron’s (20), NPR (21), The Straits Times (22), Channel News Asia (23) and Bloomberg news (24)

(19) https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/business/indonesia-nickel-china-us.html

(20) https://www.barrons.com/news/indonesia-bets-on-se-asia-s-first-battery-plant-to-become-ev-hub-8328fe72

(21) https://www.npr.org/2024/02/13/1231061492/a-leading-candidate-for-president-in-indonesia-wants-the-country-to-increase-coa

(22) https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/indonesia-set-to-become-ev-battery-battleground

(23) https://www.channelnewsasia.com/watch/indonesias-industrialisation-has-fallen-short-its-regional-peers-analyst-4122381

(24) https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/international/2024/10/17/indonesias-fixer-in-chief-bows-out-as-prabowo-takes-the-helm/

*Trump election, China and Southeast Asia’s Energy Transition*

With the recent election of Trump as President of the United States, Putra has shared his views on its impact toward the Southeast Asia’s energy transition in Asia's prominent news outlet, Nikkei Asia. According to him, Trump's withdrawal from international climate agreements will have a notable impact on climate diplomacy in Southeast Asia's energy transition, although its effect on energy investments in the region will likely remain limited. (25)

In separate publications featured in China's major news outlets, Caixin and China Daily, he argued that Trump's rise to power would likely create a larger role for China in Southeast Asia's energy transition (26) (27). Major Southeast Asian countries, such as Indonesia, stand to benefit significantly from increased engagement with China due to its capacity for rapid investment deployment. However, raising the standards of Chinese overseas investments remains essential. (27) Prior, he has also commented on Xinhua News how China’s coal provinces and their rapid industrial development toward clean energy can also provide inspirations for coal reliant economies to transition to greener industries (28)

(25) https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/How-Trump-might-shake-up-Southeast-Asia-s-clean-energy-transition

(26) https://www.caixinglobal.com/2024-12-06/commentary-will-a-trump-presidency-give-china-a-bigger-role-in-southeast-asias-energy-transition-102265317.html

(27) https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202412/10/WS67579329a310f1265a1d1fb0.html

(28) https://english.news.cn/20240917/b74ec11d54c244978a5b866ba286716f/c.html

*Indonesia’s energy Transition*

Putra has also been a notable voice in outlining the key enablers and challenges in Indonesia’s energy transition. This includes highlighting the considerations for the use of biomass to generate electricity on Reuters (29) and International Monetary Fund Finance & Development Magazine (30). He has also shared his views on Indonesia’s role in the climate and energy transition in international events held by the University of Maryland (31) in College Park and United States - Indonesia Society in Washington DC (32).

His views on the use of biomass and nuclear energy in Indonesia has been featured in Channel News Asia’s feature documentary titled “Power to the People – Bioenergy” (33) and “Insight - Will Indonesia Go Nuclear” (34).

His work while at IEEFA covering the plan for the use of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for Indonesia’s power generation (35) has been cited by Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission report on its Corruption Vulnerability Assessment (Kajian kerentanan korupsi) (36).

He has also advocated the need to transition to greener energy in the islands of the archipelago, as outlined in an Associated Press article (34). Putra has also emphasized the need to optimize international assistance such as the $20 billion funding by U.S. and its allies (35) and anticipate energy consumption growth and emissions in new sectors such as the data centres (36).

(29) https://www.reuters.com/article/business/energy/feature-betting-on-bamboo-indonesian-villages-struggle-to-source-safe-green-po-idUSL8N2LU4I6/

(30) https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2022/12/country-case-indonesia-solar-future-jacques

(31) https://cgs.umd.edu/events/indonesias-climate-future-land-energy-and-governance-open-forum-discussion

(32) https://usindo.org/feature/special-open-forum-discussion-on-indonesias-climate-future-land-energy-and-governance/

(33) https://www.channelnewsasia.com/watch/power-people/bioenergy-4439271

(34) https://www.channelnewsasia.com/watch/insight-2022-2023/will-indonesia-go-nuclear-3029031

(35) https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/kajian/kerentanan-korupsi-program-gasifikasi-pembangkit-listrik-pt-pln

(36) https://apnews.com/article/business-indonesia-g-20-summit-bali-climate-and-environment-a73dcbcb60d9a42904f7d81025b5feac

(37) https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-allies-announce-20-billion-package-to-wean-indonesia-off-coal-11668503675

(38) https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3235499/dark-clouds-ahead-indonesias-emissions-surge-asias-need-data-centres-singapores-offshore-push 222.124.125.10 (talk) 06:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It would be nice to see at least a partial review of these newly found sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I think they might meet criteria 7 of WP:NPROF. NPROF applies to anyone involved in scholarly research, so I think Adhiguna's roles at policy research think tanks qualify them to be considered under NPROF. Criteria 7 is that the subject must have "had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity", and it notes that being "frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert" may qualify. Adhiguna is clearly very widely quoted as an expert on the Indonesian energy transition, including in publications like the NYT, BBC and WSJ. They also seem to have had a significant impact outside of academia by using their scholarly research to inform Indonesian policymaking, including contributing to some influential reports like the IEA one and being a regular columnist on the energy transition for one of Indonesia's largest newspapers. I agree that they definitely don't meet WP:GNG, but I think they make a reasonable case under criteria 7 of WP:NPROF as an influential subject-matter expert. MCE89 (talk) 00:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please list their 'substantial impact' and explain how they are 'very widely quoted as an expert' after you have actually read the articles from the NYT, BBC and WSJ? Also, please clarify how you determined that these quotes have meaningful impact? I believe they are merely routine/run of the mill statements. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did read the articles. I'm not sure what you mean by routine/run of the mill statements - they are pretty clearly being quoted by each of these publications in their capacity as a subject matter expert, which is exactly what is described under 7(a) of WP:NPROF. As I said, I'm not claiming that any of these articles constitute SIGCOV or that the subject meets WP:GNG, but as someone engaged in "scholarly research" all that needs to be established is that they meet one of the seven criteria under NPROF. I think the most applicable criteria is that they have "had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity", which may be satisfied if they are "frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area" (note "quoted" - I'm aware that they are not a major focus of any of the articles, but they are certainly widely quoted as an expert on the Indonesian energy transition). So the reason I think they meet criteria 7 is that (a) they have been widely quoted in prominent international media outlets, including the WSJ, NYT, BBC, Reuters etc., as an expert in their area of research, satisfying 7(a) of NPROF, and (b) they have clearly influenced Indonesian policymaking in their area of research, as demonstrated by being cited or consulted on various government projects and publications. MCE89 (talk) 05:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So, TLDR: you actually don’t have anything meaningful or substantial to show from the NYT, BBC or WSJ articles? Instead, you’ve decided to explain NPROF#7 to me. Fascinating, but I’m still waiting for evidence of this so called ‘significant impact’.

Let's take the NYT example: Putra Adhiguna says “One way or another, Europe and the U.S. will need Indonesia nickel" and "They should be coming to this country figuring out how they can do it better." This is just a routine interview byte as he was part of Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.. They almost always comment on everything and that’s why this falls under routine coverage.

The entire article reads like a collection of his viewpoints and arguments - Putra Adhiguna emphasized this, Putra Adhiguna shared his views on that, Putra Adhiguna argued this, Putra Adhiguna commented on that - just a series of views, emphasizes, comments and arguments. Yet, there’s nothing about the work he has done or his achievements, because there aren’t any. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe tone it down a bit? My point was just that all of those articles are very standard examples of what it looks like when an expert in a particular field is quoted in the mainstream press about their area of expertise, which is exactly what 7(a) describes. Yes, it's a routine interview bite, but that's what "quoted in conventional media as an academic expert" is describing. I'm not claiming that any of these sources are SIGCOV of Putra Adhiguna, but that's not what's required - NPROF specifically says that researchers may be "notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources". It seems like you're applying the GNG standard and asking for secondary SIGCOV of the work he has done and his achievements, but I don't think NPROF requires that at all. What I'm saying is that the fact that he is a public-facing expert who frequently comments in the international press, writes for major Indonesian newspapers and seems to have some measurable influence on policymaking processes in Indonesia is enough to show that he is "notably influential in the world of ideas" per NPROF, even without the secondary SIGCOV that would be needed to meet GNG.

We're in agreement about the absence of SIGCOV though and I don't think this is particularly productive, so let's maybe leave it there? MCE89 (talk) 08:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Without concrete examples of specific policies shaped by his work or recognition within academic or policy circles, it’s hard to see how his routine media mentions meet the bar set by NPROF. It seems more like he was quoted in conventional media as a person working for the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis rather than as an academic expert. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't evaluate the wall of text and citation dump, but I can see very clearly that the subject badly fails WP:PROF: he lacks any engineering, teaching, education, or scientific degree – as well as an earned doctorate of any kind. He has never published or even written any peer-reviewed articles. He is a basically a talking head. For that, he should be evaluated using WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 00:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many resources are not related to the subject of this biography article. Even more do not discuss this subject. More citations/resources needed that discuss this subject significantly. I'm agree with the nominator talk about this article. Ariandi Lie ^{Let's talk} 04:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hopefully with some more time some further ability to consider the sources presented can be made.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep: In addition to the quotes above, appears to be a semi-regular columnist in the Jakarta Post on energy issues. I think we can have a !weak keep for the PROF as explained aobve. Oaktree b (talk) 03:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Sorry, here [63] and [64]. Oaktree b (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tulika Mehrotra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not pass WP:AUTHOR or even WP:BASIC ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 18:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Authors. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 18:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Uttar Pradesh, and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a book review from Vogue India and an article from The Hindu on her books. Not too familiar with the English-language media landscape throughout India, but I think there's a good chance there is sufficient coverage that would make this pass WP:NAUTHOR (e.g., book reviews), especially considering the books were published by Penguin (one of the Big Five publishers). Bridget (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bridget Thank you for your efforts. I also conducted a search for relevant sources initially, but I did not find them to meet the notability criteria. Both sources are primarily interview-based descriptions. The piece in Vogue India is a one-time article by Ridhima Sud, and the The Hindu article also revolves around an interview. Neither of these, on their own, can establish notability. While publishing with Penguin is a significant accomplishment, it alone does not satisfy the notability requirements according to Wikipedia's standards. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 15:10, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:AUTHOR, interviews are not RS. Deriannt (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the interview / article format and whether or not the article contains facts vetted by a reliable source and observations that were independent of the subject. Cielquiparle (talk) 09:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added a reference for her job (chief digital officer) and her marriage. I doubt they will make much difference. I'm not casting a vote on this one. Knitsey (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the additional work done on this article, I don't believe it qualifies for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This article is starting to look a lot better than when it was first nominated. Is anyone able to access the Business India article (or provide an archived link to it? Cielquiparle (talk) 09:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The improvements and added sources persuade me of notability. Also, I always think about this comment from WP:INTERVIEWS: "A multitude of interviews with a breadth of styles shows a wide range of attention being given to the subject and can be considered as evidence of notability." Rublamb (talk) 23:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strictly Ballroom (band) (3rd nomination)

People proposed deletions

[1] ttps://www.forbes.com/sites/suparnadutt/2017/03/07/how-a-health-startup-is-tackling-indias-mental-health-problems%E2%80%A8-counselling-400-patients-a-day/

[2] ttps://www.outlookindia.com/hub4business/international-womens-day-introducing-inspiring-women-leaders-shaping-the-future

[3] ttps://www.catchnews.com/health-news/i-m-a-warrior-shipra-dawar-on-fighting-depression-founding-epsyclinic-57079.html

[4] ttps://zeenews.india.com/companies/business-success-story-shipra-dawars-inspirational-journey-from-ambition-to-achievement-2703986.html

[5] ttps://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/health/moving-forward-women-entrepreneurs-bring-medical-aid-at-your-doorstep/

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{hatnote|Wikipedia's inclusion policy for articles on individuals can be found at [[WP:BIO]].}}
-{{deletionlist|People}}
+{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Navigation}}
+{{#if:|{{shortcut|{{{shortcut}}}}}}}
+This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to '''People'''.  It is one of many [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Flat|deletion lists]] coordinated by [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|WikiProject Deletion sorting]]. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
+{{ombox|style=width:850px;|text=
-Wikipedia's inclusion policy for articles on individuals can be found at [[WP:BIO]].
+'''Note:  In most cases there is another, more specific category than this one. '''
+'''<u>If possible, please use one of these instead</u>:'''
-'''Note:  In most cases there is another more specific category than this one. '''
+:''Note: The following pages are [[WP:TRANS|transcluded]] onto the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Deletion sorting|Biography Deletion sorting page]]''
-'''Please use on these instead:'''
-:''[[WP:TRANS|Transcluded]] onto [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Deletion sorting|Biography Deletion sorting page]]''
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators]]
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers]] (generally excluding adult film performers)
-*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Athletes]]
+*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Artists]]
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors]]
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople]]
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians]]
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Lists of people]]
+*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople]]
-:'''''not''' [[WP:TRANS|Transcluded]] onto [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Deletion sorting|Biography Deletion sorting page]]''
+:''Note: the following pages are not [[WP:TRANS|transcluded]] onto the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Deletion sorting|Biography Deletion sorting page]]''
-*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment/Announcements]] (e.g. models)
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians]]
-*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional characters]]
+*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion]] (e.g. models)
+*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements]]
+*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women]]
 *[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion]] for adult film actors and actresses
+}}
+{{paragraph break}}
+; Adding a new AfD discussion
+: Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to  the main page at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|WP:AFD]].  Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|WP:AFD]].  If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page.  To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
+:# <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit&section=1}} Edit this page]</span> and add '''<nowiki>{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}}</nowiki>''' to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the '''edit summary''', it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
+:# You should also tag the AfD by adding '''<nowiki>{{subst:delsort|</nowiki>{{SUBPAGENAME}}<nowiki>|~~~~}}</nowiki>''' to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
+: Note that there are a few [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting#Scripts and tools|scripts and tools]] that can make this easier.
+; Removing a closed AfD discussion
+: Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by [[User:AnomieBOT|a bot]].
+; Other types of discussions
+: You can also add and remove links to other discussions ([[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|prod]], [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|CfD]], [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|TfD]] etc.) related to People.
+; Further information
+: For further information see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|WP:AfD]] for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
+{{#if:|This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/{{ucfirst:{{{2}}}}}|{{{2}}}]].|
+}}{{#if:|This list also includes a sublist or sublists of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/{{ucfirst:}}{{!}}deletions related to ]].
+|}}{{#if:|Suggested inclusion guidelines for this topic area can be found at .|}}
+{{#ifexist:Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/{{SUBPAGENAME}}/archive|<div style="border: 1px solid #999; padding: 4px;">[[File:Replacement filing cabinet.svg|32px|Archive|alt=|link=]] Archived discussions (starting from {{#if:|{{{archivedate}}}|September 2007}}) may be found at:{{pb}}{{Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/{{SUBPAGENAME}}/archive}}</div>}}
+{| style="margin: 0 auto; font-size:smaller; background:none;"
+|width="125px"|'''{{purge|Purge page cache}} '''
+|width="125px"|'''{{Watch|{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}}} '''
+|}
+[[Category:Wikipedia deletion sorting {{#if:|}}|People]]
 ==People==
 <!-- Only if additions to this section do not clearly fit with one of the aforementioned categories, then please feel free to list or transclude. -->
+<!-- New AFDs should be placed on top of the list, directly below this line -->
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa M. Kelly}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Dilthey}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1oneam}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Newham}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_V._LaSala}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Sivan}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Lee_(still_photographer)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerbarus Fleccius}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abner_Louima}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Frank (2nd nomination)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brian_Lydell}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saba Wahid}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Vincent Lockwood}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Ferdowsmakan}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Vera Monroig (2nd nomination)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Greer}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edward_J._Megarr}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Quraishi}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spencer_Ross}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simone Bienne}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven O'Mahoney-Schwartz}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry of Normandy}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Peters (software engineer)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Hlava}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pustilnik}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomm Mandryk}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akin Ogunbiyi}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Spelmann}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joseph_Rodriguez_(photographer)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakan Ben Williams}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edd_Gould}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Zarezadeh Ardeshir}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Dimitri_(2_nomination)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Emerson (priest)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sal Villanueva}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriarch Elijah}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Whyte III}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seb West}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xenia Sackville, Lady Buckhurst}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Pendlebury}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_people_from_Cumbria}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ann_Pennington_(model)_(2nd_nomination)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jedediah Harrell}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Mathilde Ducatillon-Sauthier}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tengku Baharuddin}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulzaeb Beg Ali}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imakuni? (2nd nomination)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. T. Powers}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Husam Zaman}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuckie Mauk}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Smith (Vicar of Great Paxton)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COMTES DU GARDIN}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Carson (3rd nomination)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riccardo Buscarini}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aria (Indian singer)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeniffer Viturino}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Varner}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terje Svabø}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weidner Communications}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/William_Lee_Neal}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Odysseas-Kimon of Greece and Denmark}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Maki}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emuoboh Gbagi}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Stojanovska}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibidapo Lawal}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith47}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvis Abuyere}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Medina (artist)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Wareham Leonard}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Mi-jung (manhwa creator)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nelly_Leon-Chisen}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Santiago}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukesh Mishra}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Nilsson (2nd nomination)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric R. Gilbertson}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. W. Tatum}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Ramachandran (politician)}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassie Sumner}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Omoha}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Sheriff}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ademola Adesina}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe McConnell}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Malcolm}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Hall}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abu_Zakaria_al-Jamal}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malene Espensen}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izin Akioya}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Corrigan}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Heiberger}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raya Abirached}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dotun Ajegbile}}
-{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asim Mittal}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingsley Kobayashi}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kyle_Morrison}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Brar}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Ramzan Ali Miya}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobi Asehinde}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traveen Mathew}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasturi Murali Krishna}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shipra Dawar}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpa Sahu}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramkishan Suthar (2nd nomination)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabish Khan (art critic)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Sofie Madsen}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Anderson (model) (2nd nomination)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kioumars_Pourhashemi}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Raja_Raghuraj_Singh}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Krishna Bantawa (2nd nomination)}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalabh Gupta}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Naftali_Schiff}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert W. Faid}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neeraj_Doneria}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jim_Leisy}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Barker}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westballz}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghazi Shahzad}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faris Al-Hammadi}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ML_Lather}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Sarithiran}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putra Adhiguna}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulika Mehrotra}}
+{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strictly Ballroom (band) (3rd nomination)}}
+==People proposed deletions==
+<!-- List categories below this line. -->
+[[Category:Wikipedia deletion sorting|People]]
+[[Category:WikiProject Biography|Deletion]]