Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions
Martin23230 (talk | contribs) →US Open: comment |
→January 2: Combine nominations |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Short description|Page for suggesting items for "In The News"}}</noinclude> |
|||
{{for|administrator instructions on updating [[Template:In the news]]|Wikipedia:In the news/Admin instructions}} |
|||
{{notice|<big>Welcome to ''In the news''. Please '''[[Wikipedia:In the news|read the guidelines]]'''. Admin instructions are '''[[Wikipedia:In the news/Administrator instructions|here]]'''.</big>}}{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/header}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/header}} |
|||
{{Skip to top and bottom}} |
|||
== Archives == |
|||
{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/Archives}} |
|||
Archives of posted stories: [[Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives]] |
|||
=Suggestions= |
|||
{{Anchor|Nominations}} |
|||
{{dablink|For future events, see [[Wikipedia:In the news/Future events]].}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/Archives}} |
|||
== Sections == |
|||
This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary. |
|||
{{section sizes}} |
|||
---- |
|||
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
||
== |
== January 2 == |
||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/ |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2025 January 2]]}} |
||
{{Portal:Current events/2025 January 2}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
||
==== RD: Ágnes Keleti ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Ágnes Keleti |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = <ref>{{cite news |title=Meghalt Keleti Ágnes |url=https://www.blikk.hu/sport/meghalt-keleti-agnes/08q17gr |work=Blikk |date=2 January 2025 |language=hu}}</ref> [https://www.blikk.hu/sport/meghalt-keleti-agnes/08q17gr blikk] [https://www.portfolio.hu/gazdasag/20250102/meghalt-keleti-agnes-olimpiai-bajnok-tornasz-732283 portfolio] [https://hvg.hu/sport/20250102_Keleti-Agnes-meghalt-tornasz-olimpiai-bajnok-melbourne-helsinki-holokauszt-tulelo-sportolo-nemzet-sportoloja-ebx hvg] |
|||
| updated = yes <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = 94.44.118.57, Ugri ugri idő |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = The oldest living Olympian in history <!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/94.44.118.57|94.44.118.57]] ([[User talk:94.44.118.57#top|talk]]) 07:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
}} |
|||
== |
== January 1 == |
||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/ |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2025 January 1]]}} |
||
{{Portal:Current events/2025 January 1}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== 2025 Trump International Hotel explosion ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion |
|||
| image = Trump International Hotel Las Vegas.png |
|||
| blurb = One person is killed and seven others are injured when a [[Tesla Cybertruck]] '''[[Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion|explodes]]''' (pictured) outside of the [[Trump International Hotel Las Vegas]] in [[Paradise, Nevada|Paradise]], [[Nevada]], United States. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/01/us/car-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas.html The New York Times] [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz7qd97eyp0o BBC] [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/police-investigating-vehicle-explosion-trump-hotel-las-vegas/story?id=117252987 ABC News] |
|||
|nominator = Spworld2 |
|||
| sign = [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 09:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
:'''Strong oppose''' This was deliberated before but it was taken down. Now a few hours on, we have more coverage than [[Smoke and mirrors|smoke being reported by The Mirror]], but it still doesn't appear that important. Also, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion|the article is at AfD]], but that appears to be SNOW keep at the moment. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 05:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====Proof of the [[abc conjecture]] announced==== |
|||
::@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] This is in favor of the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump International Hotel Las Vegas Tesla Cybertruck explosion|AfD discussion]], but the article should maintain its current status. |
|||
::This does not appear to be a normal explosion, there is international media coverage[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz7qd97eyp0o][https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/01/us/car-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas.html][https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/police-investigating-vehicle-explosion-trump-hotel-las-vegas/story?id=117252987][https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/tesla-cybertruck-explodes-outside-trump-las-vegas-hotel-1-killed-7-injured-7380504], one person was killed and 7 were injured, and there are reports that this is related to the [[2025 New Orleans truck attack]] [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 05:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*[http://www.nature.com/news/proof-claimed-for-deep-connection-between-primes-1.11378 Proof claimed for deep connection between primes], Nature News, 10 September 2012 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.150.23.175|78.150.23.175]] ([[User talk:78.150.23.175|talk]]) 17:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Whether it was intentional or not, a single death is not significant to post as a story, unless it was determined to be an act of terrorism (which doesn't seem to be the case at this point). --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 05:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:Could do with some more clear info on what has changed since the last nom. --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 18:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] Was it determined to be intentional or not? There was one death and more than 7 injuries, and this did not happen near a normal hotel. 2025 New Orleans truck attack still under investigation - |
|||
*'''Comment''' [[WP:OR|Original research]] is not suitable to be announced on Wikipedia until the result has been indepedently confirmed. Quoting the linked article in short: "Many mathematicians have expended a great deal of effort trying to prove the conjecture. In 2007, French mathematician Lucien Szpiro, ... claimed to have a proof of it, but it was soon found to be flawed. He [Mochizuki] has developed techniques that very few other mathematicians fully understand ... 'At this point, he is probably the only one that knows it all.' ... The work 'uses a huge number of insights that are going to take a long time to be digested by the community'". It's a claimed proof by a mathematician to a problem that others have failed before. I've seen enough of [[P=NP#Claimed_solutions|claimed P=NP proofs]] rejected in my time to be very skeptical until this has been properly reviewed by other mathematicians. --[[User:Hydrox|hydrox]] ([[User talk:Hydrox|talk]]) 18:21, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
: |
*:FBI is trying to determine if the incident was an act of terrorism, CNN [https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/01/us/cybertruck-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas/index.html] reports [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 05:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
: |
*:Are you suggesting MINIMUMDEATHS > 1? [[User:Banedon|Banedon]] ([[User talk:Banedon|talk]]) 08:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' - this nomination has already been closed once. This could easily be just an accident or a grandiose suicide. The only reason there may be more coverage than local is because of the (possibly conincidental) timing with the New Orleans attack; which would make it the same story if there is a link. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 05:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong oppose''': Totally agreed that we need it verified first, <em>and</em> this should <em>not</em> have been brought up again given that nothing further has happened (or at least been announced). It's just promotional. WP does not need to the @math Twitter feed. —[[User:Kerfuffler|Kerfuffler]] 19:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*:@[[User:Nfitz|Nfit]] It seems that the previous nomination was terminated due to lack of quality. This does not seem to be a normal occurrence. [[User:Spworld2|Spworld2]] ([[User talk:Spworld2|talk]]) 05:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' This is trivia at its most trivial. [[User:Doktorbuk|doktorb]] <sub>[[User talk:Doktorbuk|words]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Doktorbuk|deeds]]</sup> 06:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== Schengen Area expansion ==== |
|||
==September 9== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2012 September 9]]}} |
|||
| article = Schengen Area |
|||
{|{{Portal:Current events/2012 September 9}} |
|||
| blurb = Romania and Bulgaria join the '''[[Schengen Area]]''', the European passport-free zone. |
|||
| sources = [https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/01/europe/romania-bulgaria-schengen-zone-intl/index.html CNN], [https://www.reuters.com/world/romania-bulgaria-fully-join-eus-borderless-schengen-zone-2025-01-01/ Reuters] |
|||
| sign = [[User:UCinternational|UCinternational]] ([[User talk:UCinternational|talk]]) 04:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
:'''Support''', I would argue that any changes to the composition of the [[Schengen Area]] are inherently relevant as the largest area with free movement in the world, and for years it has been a major topic of discussion here in the European Union that Romania and Bulgaria were the last EU members to not have been admitted (excl. Ireland who have an opt-out) because of a veto from Austria in the Council of the European Union. So it was very significant when the vote finally passed last month in the [[Justice and Home Affairs Council]]. |
|||
:However, that wording is probably not ideal—''in a legal sense'', Romania and Bulgaria joined the Schengen Area on 31 March 2024 when border controls were lifted for air and sea travel. The news are that land border checks have also just been lifted, granting the countries full participation on the same level as all other 27 member states. |
|||
:So I would propose re-phrasing the blurb to something like ''[[Romania]] and [[Bulgaria]] become full members of the [[Schengen Area]], with land border checks lifted on 1 January 2025.'' |
|||
: [[User:BochiBochiGalaxy|BochiBochiGalaxy]] ([[User talk:BochiBochiGalaxy|talk]]) 05:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: John B. O'Reilly Jr. ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = John B. O'Reilly Jr. |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/former-longtime-dearborn-mayor-john-jack-oreilly-jr-has-died-says-family] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = History6042 |
|||
| updaters = Moeqas, Jkaharper, |
|||
| nom cmt = 6th mayor of Dearborn, Michigan. |
|||
| sign = [[User:History6042|<span style="color:darkorange">History6042😊</span>]] '''([[User talk:History6042|<span style="color:blue">Contact me</span>]])''' 22:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
==== RD: Chad Morgan ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Chad Morgan |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-01-02/chad-morgan-australian-country-music-singer-dies/104778248 |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = HiLo48 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Australian comedy country music performer known as "The Sheik of Scrubby Creek". |
|||
| sign = [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 22:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
==== 2025 Cetinje shootings ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
|article = 2025 Cetinje shootings |
|||
|blurb = Thirteen people including the perpetrator are killed and four others are injured in '''[[2025 Cetinje shootings|spree shootings]]''' in [[Cetinje]], Montenegro. |
|||
|altblurb = Thirteen are killed in '''[[2025 Cetinje shootings|spree shootings]]''' in [[Cetinje]], Montenegro. The shootings are the deadliest in Montenegro since 1944 during Nazi occupation. |
|||
|sources = [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/several-dead-shooting-incident-montenegro-local-media-citing-police-2025-01-01/] |
|||
|nominator = SimpleSubCubicGraph}} |
|||
*'''Support on notability, oppose on quality''' Quite similar in scope as the [[2022 Cetinje shooting]], also taking place in [[Cetinje]]. Removed mention of terrorism in the blurb as it's not in the source beyond the involvement of counter-terrorist government agencies. The second shooting targeted the restaurant owner's family. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 22:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] Changed it once more to deadliest shooting in Montenegro since 1944. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::That's almost certainly not relevant. "Deadliest since X" isn't needed in a blurb. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 22:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] Please clarify if I am wrong but doesn't blurb mean short description? [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::Blurbs are almost always a single sentence and typically don't contain context in the blurb. For instance, we wouldn't have the second sentence read "Shootings in Montenegro are rare due to strict gun laws" either - that can be implied from the source or the article. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 22:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::::I turned SSCG's changes into an altblurb. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 22:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' on quality. Article is all of eight sentences. Notability is unclear. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] how is a terrorist attack that has killed as many people as the New Orleans truck attack not notable? [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::The article does not indicate that this is a terrorist incident. If that is established I would likely support on the merits, though article quality does not meet the customary standards for ITN as of this comment. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] its still people dying... [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::I am not questioning the basic notability of the subject for inclusion in the encyclopedia. But we have a higher bar for blurbs at ITN. All of which said, the immediate problem is article quality. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support on notability, oppose on quality'''. This is the worst shooting in the country since World War II, so it definitely warrants inclusion. However, the article is way too short for the main page. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 22:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:Note: I oppose the altblurb, since those facts may not be correct. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 00:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - there's no mention in the article about these being the largest shootings since WWII. Perhaps because 11 died in the same location less than 30 months ago - [[2022 Cetinje shooting]] (which was ITN). Also there were higher death counts for sprees murdering Albanians during the 1990s Yugoslav wars. This nomination is [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Nfitz. <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> 23:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support original blurb on notability, wait on quality'''. This is definitely notable with 10 dead, but the article is a very short stub. I also oppose the alternative blurb per Nfitz. --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 00:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - This doesn't seem terrorism related at all, and is rather a crazy person with a gun angry at the world after perceived slights. --[[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 00:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] he killed as many people as the new orleans truck attack, what makes this not in the news? [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 03:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::I supported this for ITN, did you mean to ping Rockstone? [[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 03:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] Yes, I am sorry. @[[User:Rockstone35|Rockstone35]] read above please [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 03:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::::@[[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]] we typically don't post things that are notable only for the number of deaths without something more. We wouldn't have posted a mass shooting that killed 10 people in the US, for example. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 03:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::@[[User:Rockstone35|Rockstone35]] so 10 people dying mean nothing to you? What if you were a family member of those people? Wouldnt you want everyone to hear what that person did? You cant be apathetic to these people just because they dont affect you. You need to understand how that not only affected the family and friends of the 10 but the entire city and nation of Montenegro. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 04:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak oppose''' per Ad Orientem and Nfitz. Beyond deaths, special notability seems shaky. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 03:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' on notability, '''oppose''' on quality. '''Wait''' until the article is not a stub to post it. [[User:Bloxzge 025|Bloxzge 025]] ([[User talk:Bloxzge 025|talk]]) 06:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====(Posted) 2025 New Orleans truck attack ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
|article = 2025 New Orleans truck attack |image=700 block of Canal Street New Orleans.jpg |
|||
|blurb = 11 people are killed and 36 others are injured in '''[[2025 New Orleans truck attack|a vehicle-ramming and shooting attack]]''' in [[New Orleans|New Orleans, Louisiana]] ''(street pictured)''. |
|||
|altblurb = Eleven people are killed and thirty-six others are injured in a '''[[2025 New Orleans truck attack|vehicle-ramming and shooting attack]]''' in [[New Orleans|New Orleans, Louisiana]] ''(intersection pictured)''. |
|||
|sources = [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-orleans-vehicle-crash-bourbon-street-crowd-casualties-shooting/][https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/01/us/new-orleans-vehicle-crash/new-orleans-vehicle-crash][https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crl378x8nnjo] |
|||
|nominator = Personisinsterest |
|||
}} |
|||
*{{Strikethrough|'''Wait''' on quality,}} '''support''' on notability. Going through some international news websites, this is the very top story on most of them and one of the top on all of them. {{Strikethrough|I think a bit more information is needed in the article, but it's a matter of time as new information comes in.}} [[User:Heythereimaguy|Heythereimaguy]] ([[User talk:Heythereimaguy|talk]]) 13:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:I, along with other users, have edited the article as more information has surfaced to the point where I believe that the article is of high enough quality. '''Support'''. [[User:Heythereimaguy|Heythereimaguy]] ([[User talk:Heythereimaguy|talk]]) 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' We typically do not post shootings in the US due to their frequency, but I will note that the fact that they found improvised explosives in the truck and the suspect was wearing armored gear suggests this is more than a run of the mill shooting, very likely premeditated. Should at least wait until some more info on the motive (if they can figure it out, the driver was killed) --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 14:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:For what it's worth, this was more a vehicle attack than a shooting. [[User:Heythereimaguy|Heythereimaguy]] ([[User talk:Heythereimaguy|talk]]) 15:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*: The article is called "car attack" (actually now "truck attack"), so it is puzzling why one would ignore that central aspect when assessing the article's notability. [[User:Einsof|Einsof]] ([[User talk:Einsof|talk]]) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' on quality and '''support without image''' for notability, however, the current image of just the street is, in my opinion, irrelevant. We don't need an image for every blurb. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 14:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*Use '''Terrorist attack''' instead of 'Car attack' if confirmed. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 15:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' quality is ok now. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 15:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support:''' This is the worst terrorist attack on American soil in years. '''[[User:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">BOTTO</span>]]'''<sub> ([[User talk:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">T</span>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">C</span>]])</sub> 15:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{Ping|Personisinsterest}} Would you be able to change the link in your nomination to [[2025 New Orleans truck attack]]? The article has been renamed since you nominated it. '''[[User:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">BOTTO</span>]]'''<sub> ([[User talk:Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">T</span>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Botto|<span style="color:#38003B">C</span>]])</sub> 17:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*::Got it! [[User:Personisinsterest|Personisinsterest]] ([[User talk:Personisinsterest|talk]]) 18:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Its the new year and a terrorist attack happened. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. Quality is fine given the amount of publicly available information. Notable based on high number of casualties for a vehicle-ramming attack. [[User:Einsof|Einsof]] ([[User talk:Einsof|talk]]) 17:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Similar to the [[2024 Magdeburg car attack]] that was posted at couple weeks earlier. Even more dead though and with an ISIS flag, bombs and guns, this is not run-of-the-mill in any way. Quality is good considering the amount of info available at the moment. --[[User:Torsodog|<b style="color:#000000">T</b><span style="color:#993300">orsodo</span><b style="color:#000000">g</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Torsodog|Talk]]</sup> 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' – '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 18:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) 2025 Trump Tower fire ==== |
|||
{{atop|result=Withdrawn by nom. {{NAC}} <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> 21:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
|article = 2025 Trump tower explosion |blurb = A cybertruck catches on fire near the Trump Tower with casulaties still unknown. |sources = https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-trump-tower-explosion-horror-34403879]|nominator = SimpleSubCubicGraph}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''' and topic ban [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]] from ITN. A car fire? And the sole source in the nomination is from a somewhat questionable tabloid list as [[WP:MREL]]. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 18:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*: Don't [[WP:BITE]]. <span style="text-shadow:1px 1px 10px #ff0000, 1px 1px 10px #ccc; font-weight:bold; font-family:Century Gothic;"><i>🔥[[User:Jalapeño|Jala]][[User_talk:Jalapeño|peño]]🔥</i></span> <small>[[Special:Contributions/Jalapeño|contribs]]</small> |
|||
* '''Strong oppose''' [[WP:NTRUMP]] - no casualties confirmed or reported yet, damage unclear but doesn't appear much, reporting is coming from inside the tower implying most inside are more or less safe but they're saying that ''the fire wasn't even at the tower.'' The "big story" is literal reporting on ''[[Smoke and mirrors|smoke via The Mirror]]''. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Wow''' Great to see some serious sources wading in: [https://www.gbnews.com/news/us/donald-trump-hotel-las-vegas-fire-smoke-explosion ''GB News''], [https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-trump-tower-explosion-horror-34403952 ''Daily Star''], and [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14241815/trump-international-hotel-las-vegas-evacuated-black-smoke.html ''Wiki's Favourite'']. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] I assumed it was a terrorist attack given that another one happened in New Orleans just a few hours ago. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
== December 31 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 31]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 31}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== RD: Jocelyn Wildenstein ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Jocelyn Wildenstein<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://people.com/jocelyn-wildenstein-dead-catwoman-socialite-plastic-surgery-8767989 People]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = 240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = Jkaharper<!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Swiss socialite best known for her extensive cosmetic surgery.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26|240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26]] ([[User talk:240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26|talk]]) 02:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Arnold Rüütel ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Arnold Rüütel |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.err.ee/1609561162/suri-arnold-ruutel] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = 2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = 3rd [[President of Estonia]] from 2001–2006. |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD|2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD]] ([[User talk:2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD|talk]]) 04:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
:'''Not Ready''' Multiple CN tags --[[User:MtPenguinMonster|MtPenguinMonster]] ([[User talk:MtPenguinMonster|talk]]) 08:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Several instances in the article of sourcing issues which need to be fixed. Cheers, ''atque supra''! [[User:Fakescientist8000|Fake]][[User talk:Fakescientist8000|scientist]][[Special:Contributions/Fakescientist8000|8000]] 14:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: Angelo Amato ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = Angelo Amato |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://silerenonpossum.com/it/requiem-cardinale-angeloamato/] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = History6042 |
|||
| creator = LCahill |
|||
| updaters = History6042 |
|||
| nom cmt = Italian cardinal who died yesterday. |
|||
| sign = [[User:History6042|<span style="color:darkorange">History6042😊</span>]] '''([[User talk:History6042|<span style="color:blue">Contact me</span>]])''' 04:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Almost there''' One CN tag. But it's an entire list of his publications. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*{{Added}} ISBNs [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 04:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: Johnnie Walker ==== |
|||
|article = 2012 US Open (tennis) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Johnnie Walker (DJ) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c728nxnx03eo BBC] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = Ollieisanerd <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = R. fiend |
|||
| updaters = Cameron Scott |
|||
| nom cmt = English disc jockey. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Ollieisanerd|<span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #007FFF; color: #98FB98;">Ollieisanerd</span>]] ([[User talk:Ollieisanerd|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ollieisanerd|contribs]]) 16:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
:'''Support''' He seems to be quite popular as a DJ, including winning many awards. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
|blurb = [[Andy Murray]] wins the [[2012 US Open – Men's Singles|Men's Singles]] at the '''[[2012 US Open (tennis)|US Open]]''' while [[Serena Williams]] wins the [[2012 US Open – Women's Singles|Women's Singles]]. |
|||
::{{tqq|Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see [[Wikipedia talk:In the news/2016 RD proposal|this RFC]] and [[Wikipedia talk:In the news/Archive 57#Are animals eligible for the Recent Deaths section?|further discussion]]). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets [[WP:ITNRD]].}} [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 12:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Note:''' currently 18 {cn} tags. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 18:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Not Ready''' per Martinevans123. Referencing is not up to scratch. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 04:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) 2024 United States Treasury Hack==== |
|||
|ITNR = yes |
|||
{{atop |
|||
| result = Good faith nom. However, consensus to post will not develop. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 02:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate|recent deaths=no|article=2024 United States Department of the Treasury hack|blurb= The Chinese Communist Party hacks into the United States Treasury, stealing valuable data|altblurb=The [[United States Department of the Treasury]] states that it was '''[[2024 United States Department of the Treasury hack|hacked]]''' by a Chinese intelligence agency.|sources=[https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/us-treasurys-workstations-hacked-cyberattack-by-china-afp-reports-2024-12-30/ (Reuters)]|nominator=SimpleSubCubicGraph|nomcmt=A major scandal within the Treasury that involves a foreign adversary.}} |
|||
* '''Oppose''' First, that blurb is extremely misleading on two angles: Chinese hackers are suspected, but there's not yet any connection to the CCP. Second, the data took was "unclassified documents", which means it is unlikely to be "valuable" data from the Treasure department. As such, this is nowhere close to a major scandle, they just had to report it after reporting it to Congress. At this point, its not a significant incident. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
|updated = no |
|||
:@[[User:Masem|Masem]] To your first point, yes that is true, a "suspicion" but 99% likely CCP hackers. Secondly, unclassified does not mean publicly available data, there are unclassified documents in the military, but that does not mean you can go around looking at it. Also the extent of the hack is still unreported. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 01:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
|nominator = Presidentman |
|||
::Nonetheless I will still leave it up to garner a community census. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 01:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Which is why at this point, how significant this is is unknown, particularly compared to the phone network hacks earlier this previous month. As this happened earlier this month and only being reported on now, we should wait until we see if there's a serious diplomatic issue that develops. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Oh no, my data! Seriously though, per above this isn't a major or important development yet. Much larger cyberattacks have happened since, such as [[National Public Data]] where actual valuable information was confirmed to be leaked, and that wasn't posted because we couldn't muster enough editors to get that up to quality. Tell me, what was stolen exactly? I'll reconsider if this gets more coverage. I'd give '''weak support''' on quality here. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 04:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:Departure–|Departure–]] you know the Treasury will not leak what was stolen, but it was likely the programs that monitor and communicate with funding. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 05:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' the blurb, it is laughably breaking many WPian notions. '''Nothing''' to say on posting another blurb. [[User:ExclusiveEditor|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF7043,#FFCC80);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-left-radius:6px;border-bottom-left-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;">Exclusive</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#263238,#37474F);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-right-radius:6px;border-bottom-right-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:-1px;">Editor</span>]] [[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|<sub style="font-size:11px;color:#757575;font-style:italic;letter-spacing:.5px;">🔔 Ping Me!</sub>]] 08:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Please do not [[WP:BITE]]. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 09:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I didn't mean it in a devious way, but that in the process of forming a blurb, it produced something which is a bit humorous, as well as not fit few Wiki guidelines. I hope {{u|SimpleSubCubicGraph}} didn't get it the wrong way. It is a good faith nom anyway. --{{User:ExclusiveEditor/Signature}} 11:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:@ExclusiveEditor I'm sorry, I won't make a new post anymore if thats what you want [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::@[[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] You got me, I meant you to not post anything ever again, stop editing and take a pretty much [[Sannyasa|sanyasa]] from this wiki world of illusions.{{FBDB}} --{{U|ExclusiveEditor}}[[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|(talk)]] 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:ExclusiveEditor|ExclusiveEditor]] I can not tell if that is humor or not, and yes I am being serious. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 22:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' Just the latest in [[Chinese intelligence activity abroad]] ([[Chinese espionage in the United States]], [[Chinese espionage in California]]) and [[Chinese information operations and information warfare]]. [[2024 United States telecommunications hack]] was another one of these along with the [[Chinese interference in the 2024 United States elections]]; this isn't as unique of a story as it would initially seem. If things escalate we can re-consider. [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 09:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Masem. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 12:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Insignificant '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 16:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Masem. -- [[User:KTC|KTC]] ([[User talk:KTC|talk]]) 23:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong Oppose''' and [[WP:WHACK!]] [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph]] for a horrid nomination. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 23:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per everybody. --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 23:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per further thought. After rethinking about the grand scope of the article, I have changed my opinion on the matter and no longer think it is newsworthy enough to end up on the front page. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 5:04:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
== December 30 == |
|||
|sources = [http://espn.go.com/tennis/usopen12/story/_/id/8360200/serena-williams-survives-victoria-azarenka-4th-open-crown ESPN (Women's)] |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 30]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 30}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
---- |
|||
==== RD: Michael Newberry ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Michael Newberry (footballer) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2024/1230/1488535-cliftonville-defender-michael-newberry-dies-aged-27/ RTE], [https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/articles/c8ew80ze410o BBC] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = The C of E <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = The C of E |
|||
| nom cmt = English-born Northern Irish footballer |
|||
| sign = <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the King!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 10:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Support''' Quality looks good to me. [[User:QuicoleJR|QuicoleJR]] ([[User talk:QuicoleJR|talk]]) 18:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: Jamshid bin Abdullah ==== |
|||
|sign = [[User:Presidentman|Presidentman]] [[User talk:Presidentman|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Presidentman|contribs]] [[User:Presidentman/potd|Random Picture of the Day]] ([[WP:TBACK|Talkback]]) 23:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Jamshid bin Abdullah of Zanzibar |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.atheer.om/2024/12/30/084116/ Atheer.om] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Mr. Lechkar <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Last [[sultan of Zanzibar]], claimant to the defunct throne since the monarchy was overthrown in 1964. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Mr. Lechkar|Mr. Lechkar]] ([[User talk:Mr. Lechkar|talk]]) 10:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
:'''Support''' Article looks good, though it's also pretty short. [[User:Yo.dazo|Yo.dazo]] ([[User talk:Yo.dazo|talk]]) 14:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*There's nothing on his early life and I conclude that it’s not fit for posting in its current state. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 16:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Joka-who? '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|And the horse]]</sup> 08:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per ITN/R. '''Wait''' until mens is finished. It's tomorrow, no reason to rush. '''Needs update''' no prose. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 00:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:I've added a prose update covering the women's singles final.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 15:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support when the men's final is over. Wait for now.'''Meets ITNR.<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 17:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*:Why wait? We have a winner now.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 17:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*::Hold your horses.Still two hours to go before the match begins.<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 17:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support when results are in''' Per ITN/R. --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 18:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:We have usually posted the women's events first, and then added the men's. I trust when the blurb is posted, it will be without the redundant capitals in the current proposal. [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 20:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*all the results :) --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 01:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. Provided [[Andy Murray|the right man]] wins, of course. [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 22:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*:If Murray wins can we add something in the blurb like 'first Briton to win a grand slam in xx years? Seems somewhat significant.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 00:12, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Murray has no run away at match point. Pity Djokovic gave it away.. |
|||
:::Its done, but oppose the trivial addition of "first ABriton" to ITN, itll be on the page.[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 01:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::I agree that there needs to be no mention of him being the first Briton to win for 76 years, it's a side thing and a little trivial. Also, for the sake of raging nationalists it's best to keep any mention of his nationality off the front page I should warn. --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 01:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Agree that nationality should not feature (it doesn't normally). And another reason for not posting the "first British since..." bits is that he is not the first British GS winner in x years (that would probably be Virginia Wade), nor even the first British male GS winner in 76 years (that would be various doubles winners, including his brother a few years ago in the mixed doubles and Jonathan Marray only a few months ago in the men's doubles). Andy Murray is the first British male singles Grand Slam title winner in 76 years, but the qualifiers 'male' and 'singles' are important. But this is all irrelevant, as I've said below that only a 'normal' ITN posting is needed here. But I thought it worth pointing out in case someone suggested something and got it wrong (as above). [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 01:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' (if updates are sufficient). Also agree that a normal posting is all that's needed here. No need to emphasise the various records/duration-since-last-winner elements for either Williams or Murray. And agree with dropping the unnecessary capitals in the blurb - suggest following the wording used in previous tennis Grand Slam ITN items. Oh, and well done Andy! :-) [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 01:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*As a non-Brit I support mentioning the nationality as I said above. I think it's pretty significant that a country that hosts a grand slam event and gave the world tennis in its modern form has had its first mens' major winner in over 70 years. It's just a guess but I imagine that in a year that's been pretty successful for British sport this will be one of the more significant British sporting moments in decades. It's a nice factoid to add as a hook to the blurb. I suppose it might be pretty hard to be concise though with both the mens and womens winners to mention.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 02:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**As I said above, if you are going to suggest this, please get it right (finding a source would probably help you get it right). You added 'men's', but missed out 'singles' in what you said. i.e. it should be stated as the first British winner of a male singles Grand Slam tennis title (not 'major') for 76 years. But it is precisely because you need the qualifiers 'male' and 'singles' that it is difficult to keep this concise enough. The alternative would be to split up the two, and expand the entry on Serena Wiliams, as her achievements establish several records (see her article), helping to cement her place as one of the greats of the women's game. I suspect, though, that by the time this is all sorted out, someone will have posted the simple "X and Y win" entry. If people want something different from the ordinary ITN/R postings, then you need to plan ahead and get consensus here ahead of time. Oh, and the reason posting the nationality would be a bad idea is that it could lead to a squabble over British/Scottish... (silly, but very likely). [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 02:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
***Here's the thing: The only ITN worthy news is the tournament final itself. Not the greatest Briton in 70 odd years thing. It's never the norm to post stuff like this along with the regular blurb anyway, it's that...uncomplicated folks! And sadly that is likely, anyone who quickly scans the page history will know that :( --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 02:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
****I agree 100% (and have said so twice above already). I'm merely trying to make sure that inaccuracies don't get posted (even if it is vanishingly unlikely such 'extended' entries will be posted anyway). I could have not corrected Johnsemlak, but thought it safest to do so anyway. It would have been quicker to post the entry to ITN, but I think someone should rustle up a picture first. Of Andy, of course! :-) [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 02:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*****I'm aware of the qualifiers that are necessary and just not looking them the precise durations involved; of course I agree the blurb must be factually accurate. I don't think there's consensus to post the nationality so I'm not sure it's worth much discussion for now; but I maintain I think it will be a very significant result. The BBC called it 'historic'. Of course they're flagwaving but here there's a substantive reason to do so.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 02:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
******You could look up Djokovic's first Grand Slam win and see if his nationality was mentioned on ITN back then. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 02:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment:''' Women's final has a prose update ([[2012_US_Open_(tennis)#Day_14_.289_September.29|here]]); men's final needs a prose update. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T♦</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 06:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' without mentioning Britain's first X. However, I was wondering if there would be any way to word it something like: ''At the '''[[2012 US Open (tennis)|US Open]]''' [[Andy Murray]] wins the [[2012 US Open – Men's Singles|Men's Singles]], his first [[Grand Slam]] victory, while [[Serena Williams]] wins her 30th Grand Slam title (or 15th singles title if you prefer) in the [[2012 US Open – Women's Singles|Women's Singles]].'' (possibly not the best wording). Both numbers seem somewhat significant to me, and it is a compromise instead of invoking the nationalities. Just a thought.--[[User:Martin23230|'''<font face="Century Gothic" size="3">23230'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Martin23230|<font face="Century Gothic">talk</font>]]</sup> 08:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Oppose''' He is insignificant. Although he may be the heir, that is about the peak of his fame. Zanzibar is apart of Tanzania now and even then was a state that nobody cared about, both strategically and relevance. This would not be good for In the news but rather Did you know and even then, its very hard if that should appear on that page. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 01:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
==== Nigeria flooding ==== |
|||
::FYI, for RD we normally only oppose due to the quality of the article. If it has an article, the subject is notable enough to appear in RD. [[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 01:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Per Schwede66. Article needs a lot more info such as about early life, which could be expanded a bit. Plus, there's some cn tags. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 01:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====RD: Linda Lavin==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate|recent deaths=yes|article=Linda Lavin|sources=[https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/linda-lavin-tony-winning-broadway-actress-starred-sitcom-117192234 (ABC)]|nominator=QalasQalas|nom cmt=great loss actress and she deserves}} |
|||
:'''Comment''': Article looks fine except the whole filmography is unsourced. [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 01:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== Ethiopian Truck Crash ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
|article = 2024 Sidama truck crash |image=Ethiopiantruckcrash.webp|blurb = [[Ethiopian]] [[truck]] crash kills 71 people.|altblurb = 71 people die in an [[Ethiopian]] [[truck]] crash|71 People dead after an [[Ethiopian]] Truck Crash| |
|||
altblurb2= [[2024 Sidama truck crash |'''A truck falls off a bridge''']] over the [[Ganale Doria River]] in [[Bona Zuria]], [[Sidama Region]], Ethiopia, killing 71 people and injuring 4 others.|sources = [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/30/at-least-71-people-killed-in-ethiopia-road-accident]|nominator = Alexgmail2000}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Article is a stub. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 12:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:*It is no longer a stub, I believe. [[User:Ca|Ca]] <i><sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">[[User talk:Ca|talk to me!]]</sup></i> 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:*:I still believe it is a stub / article needs expansion. [[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 16:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:*::Someone with local sources to help us? [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 17:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Article is decent and significant as the [[Minas Gerais road crash]]. The year 2024 is ending very badly. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 12:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Is "disaster" the right word for the article name? the sources seem to leave it as "accident" even with a toll that high? --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Like [[Madan Ashrit Highway disaster]] and [[Westdene dam disaster]]. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 13:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The move from truck crash to this new title was not discussed and should be reverted. "[[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events)|Try to avoid the words '''disaster''', '''tragedy''' and '''crisis''']] because this characterization is too subjective. It is preferable to use specific event names, such as collision, collapse, explosion, outbreak, pandemic, sinking, oil spill, and the like." |
|||
*:Also '''Oppose''' on quality and sourcing. |
|||
*:[[User:Dreameditsbrooklyn|Dreameditsbrooklyn]] ([[User talk:Dreameditsbrooklyn|talk]]) 16:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I moved the article. [[User:Ca|Ca]] <i><sup style="display:inline-flex;rotate:7deg;">[[User talk:Ca|talk to me!]]</sup></i> 16:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' The article significant because of many sources reported it numerous times. [[User:AsteriodX|AsteriodX]] ([[User talk:AsteriodX|talk]]) 15:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' on notabilty, '''Wait''' on quality, hopefully the article will improve eventually. [[User:ExclusiveEditor|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF7043,#FFCC80);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-left-radius:6px;border-bottom-left-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;">Exclusive</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#263238,#37474F);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-right-radius:6px;border-bottom-right-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:-1px;">Editor</span>]] [[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|<sub style="font-size:11px;color:#757575;font-style:italic;letter-spacing:.5px;">🔔 Ping Me!</sub>]] 17:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' What is it with disasters this week? '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 17:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:Setarip|Setarip]] what is with the entire year, so many incidents happening. its crazy, espically the latter half [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::Oh and '''Support''' [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 18:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' on article quality [[WP:STUB]] [[User:QalasQalas|QalasQalas]] ([[User talk:QalasQalas|talk]]) 20:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Wait''' for article quality then '''support altblurb2 without picture''' as the current image is too low quality. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 22:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' [[bus plunge]] [[User:Orbitalbuzzsaw|This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang]] ([[User talk:Orbitalbuzzsaw|talk]]) 22:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:"Truck" plunge. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 00:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:This is actually a very good point about how news media, now with 24/7 operations, needs news to cover, and why as an encyclopedia we should be wary of giving attention to every single accident that gets reported.<span id="Masem:1735607177358:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 01:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Wait''' until article quality improves, then '''Support Altblurb 2''' due to the high number of casualties. ''P.S. is going into edit source the correct way to reply to an ITN nom? This is my first time and I couldn't find info about it.'' --[[User:SpectralIon|SpectralIon]] ([[User talk:SpectralIon|talk]]) 00:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support on notability''' once the article is no longer a stub. high number of casualties, significant coverage. [[User:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:Teal;">Flip</b>]][[Special:Contribs/Flipandflopped|<sup style="color:purple">and</sup>]][[User talk:Flipandflopped|<b style="color:lime">Flopped</b>]] [[Wikipedia:Civility|<b style="color:grey"> ツ</b>]] 01:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Article is a stub and we don’t post those. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 16:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Little encyclopedic value to our readers. [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 23:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I'm trying to do something but no updates yet. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 00:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
:'''support''' just posted N'orleans with a dozen dead. Only logical.[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 21:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
::We can make an exception here. It's so tragical. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
== December 29 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 29]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 29}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
---- |
|||
==== 2024 Estlink 2 incident ==== |
|||
Note that I've moved the item to 29 Dec, the date of the ship's transfer to [[Porvoo]] (see ALT2), as otherwise, this would be stale by now. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 18:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = 2024 Estlink 2 incident |
||
| image = File:Estlink map.png |
|||
| blurb = '''[[2012 Nigeria floods|Flooding]]''' in [[Nigeria]] kills 137 people and displaces over 120,000 other people. |
|||
| blurb = The submarine power cable [[Estlink]] 2 '''[[2024 Estlink 2 incident|is damaged by an oil tanker suspected of belonging to Russia]]'''. |
|||
| sources = [http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/09/us-nigeria-floods-idUSBRE8880D320120909 Reuters], [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48961000/ns/weather/ MSCNBC], [http://news.yahoo.com/nigeria-floods-kill-137-displace-thousands-171429725.html Yahoo] |
|||
| |
| recent deaths = no |
||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| updated2 = |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| nominator = Activism1234<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| altblurb = Finnish police take over oil tanker ''[[Eagle S]]'', suspected of '''[[2024 Estlink 2 incident|damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2]]'''. |
|||
| updater = <!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = [[Eagle S]], suspected of '''[[2024 Estlink 2 incident|damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2]]''', is transferred to [[Porvoo]] for investigation. |
|||
| updater2 = <!-- if more than one updater --> |
|||
| sources = https://yle.fi/a/74-20133526 |
|||
| updater3 = <!-- if more than two updaters --> |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at Wikipedia:In the news/Recurring events. --> |
|||
| nominator = NotAGenious <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| note = Article needs to be updated a bit more. A list of references can be found on the talk page. |
|||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| nom cmt = |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| sign = --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 20:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = I'll try to combine https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eagle_S_on_the_map_of_MarineTraffic,_in_relation_to_the_Estlink_2_incident.png with the cropped version of the Estlink map if I get a chance to do so. A significant event mentioned in multiple international news sources. |
|||
| sign = [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 14:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Oppose''' as it's yet clear the exact cause, whether intentional sabotage or something else. Just having massive reporting doesn't necessarily make it an appropriate WP topic since WP is not a newspaper. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 16:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I disagree that finding an exact cause should be a requirement for appearing on the main page: the article, which has speculation from reliable sources, is useful by itself. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 18:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' since it's not the first cable damaged in the area this past month and I doubt the impact will be anywhere near the [[Nord Stream pipelines sabotage|Nord Stream sabotage]] in 2022. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 17:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:SPECULATION]]. Sorry, but we don’t post speculations.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 18:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:it's confirmed that an outside force destroyed the cable, just the cause is under investigation [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 22:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' there's nothing speculative about an international sabotage incident that is an act of economic terrorism, and given the type of incident it is we may never know the full true story (just like in falsified elections for example), that shouldn't barr a posting though; [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] isn't a compelling argument either. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The blurb speculates that the incident was caused by a Russian oil tanker (this isn't even mentioned in the article). Furthermore, the article is in bad shape to demonstrate why this incident is significant.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 07:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::the article does mention it. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 11:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Now that it's improved, yes, but it didn't when I wrote the comment.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 13:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2024_Estlink_2_incident&oldid=1265510819 No, it was.] {{quote|the tanker Eagle S, registered to the Cook Islands and part of Russia's shadow fleet...}} |
|||
*::::{{quote|The police confirmed that the tanker is suspected of having caused the failure}} [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 14:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', although the blurb needs to be updated. A bigger story here is that Finland has seized a Russian tanker suspected of being involved in cutting the cable.[https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/26/world/europe/finland-estonia-cables-russia.html] [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 23:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' even on the off-chance it was accidental, still a series incident. [[user:dmartin969|–DMartin]] 01:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* I've added an alternative blurb and [[2024 Estlink 2 incident#Reactions|#Reactions]]. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 10:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Notified [[WT:FINLAND]] and [[WT:ESTONIA]] for further input here. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 18:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Per above, do not add votes without giving your reason. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 07:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::It's a major incident with huge coverage and international reactions. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 19:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - Unusual international incident that our well-sourced article is being updated on. No tags, though the redlinks are arguably distracting. NATO response is highly notable. Given increasing tensions in the Baltic and the continuing news coverage, this altblurb is a good fit for ITN. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 16:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support''' - There was a covering of the Baltic Sea Disruptions in current events a few weeks ago. This is also notable due to rising geopolitical tensions. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 19:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Important enough in the context of the present cold war between East and West. [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 02:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Question''' - should a new article be created for this, or is there an existing article we can update? Feel free to create and update on your own if you'd like. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 21:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*Is this stale? The earliest item on ITN is from December 26. [[User:Natg 19|Natg 19]] ([[User talk:Natg 19|talk]]) 07:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:If we're going with the alternative blurb, it's actually the 26th. If we want a blurb telling about the transfer to Porvoo for investigation, it was yesterday, the 29th. [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support Pending Article Creation''' Huge natural disaster. Definitely ITN worthy, but not until its own article is created. -- <span style="background:#000000">'''[[User:Anc516|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Anc516</span>]]'''</span> ([[User talk:Anc516|Talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/Anc516|Contribs]]) 22:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*::The admins didn't check the consensus in time. A pity. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Article created''' - I've created the article and I am working on it. I have made a list of many references to use on the talk page - I've got to go for now, so feel free to update the article with them. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 23:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*:I've added a second alt blurb (transfer to Porvoo) and request further comments. |
|||
*'''Conditional support''' Obviously a major natural disaster, but the article doesn't seem to be ready--[[User:Yerevanci|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="blue">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevanci|<sub>''ասելիք կա՞''</sub>]] 00:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - Event and article is stale, as these events occured in July and August. No longer "in the news', as I define it. [[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] 01:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**Article is being updated to include the events of last day, which so far have killed 137 people and uprooted over 120,000. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 01:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per Jusdafax, and '''suggest [[WP:DYK]]'''. Unless I'm mistaken, the only recent development is the announcement of the latest death and displacement figures—incidentally, the sources indicate a figure of 36,331 displaced persons, not 120,000. The [http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/09/us-nigeria-floods-idUSBRE8880D320120909 Reuters] report states: "Floods across Nigeria have killed 137 people and displaced more than 30,000 ''since the beginning of July'', the local Red Cross said on Sunday." (emphasis added) -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|talk]])</sup> 04:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', a major natural disaster. The article has been created and can be expanded.[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 06:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Ongoing event. Death-toll is high.<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 17:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*Why is this item marked "ready"? Putting aside, for a moment, the question of whether it should be featured at all, neither the article nor the blurb are suitable for posting. The figure of 120,000 displaced persons is ''not supported by any of the sources'' and the article contains ''no recent update''. -- '''[[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Black Falcon|talk]])</sup> 19:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**I concur, and have removed the ready tag. The item may be significant, and a proper article and update may be appropriate for posting, but I as well have serious concerns over the state of the article. If these were fixed, I could support as well, but merely being a significant event should not excuse an article in this state. If this needs to be on the main page, it needs fixing up. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 20:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment:''' No update for any flooding occurring in September. If there is notable, recent flooding, please update, but otherwise, I would suggest DYK if eligible. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T♦</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 06:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
====2024 Chadian parliamentary election==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| |
|article = 2024 Chadian parliamentary election |
||
|image= File:Flag of Chad.svg |
|||
| blurb = The '''[[40th Chess Olympiad]]''' concludes with [[Armenia]] winning the open and [[Russia]] winning the women's section of the tournament. |
|||
|blurb = Chad holds its [[2024 Chadian parliamentary election|legislative elections]] that have been delayed several times since 2011. |
|||
| sources = [http://results.chessolympiadistanbul.com/tnr77681.aspx?art=0&lan=1&flag=30 Tournament's official website] |
|||
| |
|altblurb = |
||
| |
|altblurb2 = |
||
|altblurb3 = |
|||
| nominator = Yerevanci <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
|recent deaths = no |
|||
| updater = <!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
|sources = [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/28/voting-begins-in-chad-as-opposition-parties-call-for-election-boycott] |
|||
| updater2 = <!-- if more than one updater --> |
|||
|nominator = History6042 |
|||
| updater3 = <!-- if more than two updaters --> |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at Wikipedia:In the news/Recurring events. --> |
|||
| note = Chess Olympiad is the most important chess team tournament occurring every two years. It is also listed on [[Wikipedia:ITN/R#Chess|WP:ITN/R]] |
|||
| nom cmt = |
|||
| sign = [[User:Yerevanci|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="blue">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevanci|<sub>''talk''</sub>]] 15:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*''' |
*'''Wait''' until official results are in. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 01:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' I also support a different wording in the blurb mentioning the conclusion of the women's tournament as well. Something like "The '''[[40th Chess Olympiad]]''' concludes with [[Armenia]] winning the open and [[Russia]] winning the women's section of the tournament." sounds better. The same blurb was used when we posted it two years ago.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 16:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''': I love chess. Oh wait. Premier chess tournament isn't it? So yes!!! --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 17:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. Listed on [[Wikipedia:ITN/R#Chess|WP:ITN/R]]. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA|talk]]) 17:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' I've just completed the update of the article.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 17:29, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
** I could add that this was definitely posted last year. I remember! --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
***It was posted last time, but it was in 2010.:)--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 17:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**** It's a memory game is it? :P well, I don't think I even knew ITN/C existed back then...I think I may of been a mere IP making small edits back then. If I remember correctly, it's always Eastern Europe that has the great success. Keh. --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 17:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*****The game is popular worldwide and record 157 countries fielded their own national teams at this Olympiad. However, it's true that the countries from Eastern Europe usually achieve the best results.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 17:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Ready''' Seems that we've already reached a consensus, the article is updated, and if no further objection is given, the nomination should be marked as ready for posting.--[[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] ([[User talk:Kiril Simeonovski|talk]]) 17:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' adding biased support. Bi-annual international sporting event; this year with 159(!) countries entering a team. Regards, [[User:Sun Creator|Sun Creator]]<sup>([[User talk:Sun Creator|talk]])</sup> 17:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - per above reasons. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 19:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted'''. --[[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] ([[User talk:BorgQueen|talk]]) 20:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
====(Posted blurb) RD/Blurb Jimmy Carter==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| |
|article = Jimmy Carter |
||
|image=File:JimmyCarterPortrait2.jpg |
|||
| article2 = <!-- Do not wikilink - leave blank if nominating only one article --> |
|||
|blurb = Former American president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''' dies at the age of 100 |
|||
| blurb = Fugitive Iraqi Vice President '''[[Tariq al-Hashimi]]''' is sentenced in absentia by a Baghdad court to death for his involvement in murder of two people. |
|||
|altblurb = Former United States president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''' dies at the age of 100. |
|||
| sources = [http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/09/world/meast/iraq-vp-death-sentence/ (CNN)][http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/09/tariq-al-hashemi-vice-president-death-sentence_n_1868347.html (The Hufftington Post)][http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/09/iraq-hashemi-idINL5E8K90LN20120909 (Reuters)] |
|||
|altblurb2 = Former president of the United States and Nobel Peace Prize laureate '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''' dies at the age of 100. |
|||
| updated = |
|||
|altblurb3 = [[Nobel Peace prize|Nobel Peace laureate]] and former U.S. President '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''', behind the [[eradication of dracunculiasis|campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis]], dies at 100. |
|||
| updated2 = |
|||
|recent deaths = yes |
|||
| nominator = Egeymi <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
|sources = [https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2024/12/29/jimmy-carter-president-dead/ Washington Post] |
|||
| updater = |
|||
|nominator = Nableezy |
|||
| updater2 = |
|||
| updater3 = |
|||
| ITNR = |
|||
| note = Very significant move in Iraq where the fatal attacks are going on. It may lead to increase in struggle between sects in the country. The news is covered largely by the media. The article is not so comprehensive, but included significant points. Further update can be completed in a short time. |
|||
| nom cmt = |
|||
| sign = [[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 14:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support''' - it's not every day a vice-president gets put in jail, and when you consider that's in Iraq, the implications can be huge. It's top news story on a variety of outlets as well. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 15:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::It should ne noted that the article's subject is sentenced to death and is currently a fugitive (as now noted in the blurb) and is in Turkey. He appears unlikely to be returned, and is not in jail nor likely to be as far as I can tell. [[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] 16:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' on the condition we change "former" to "fugitive" in the blurb--he had not left office when he fled. Also, the lead doesn't even mention the death sentence. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 16:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:*Thanks for suggestion, since the term "former" was completely misleading. I corrected it.[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 16:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' I agree with Activism. It is a important story also we can use [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-19537301 BBC].--[[User:Reality006|<font color="#0066CC">'''Reality'''</font>]] 16:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Neutral''' for now. 1) "two deaths" is rather minor. The article is missing an important piece: who was killed and when? If he was coordinating attacks while serving as VP then I can support. He left office in May, and the warrant was issued in December. 2) Per WT:ITN we don't post until the appeals process is complete, so I guess we have to wait until he comes out of hiding to appeal his conviction. '''Comment''' this will probably go up, so please include "in absentia" in the blurb. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 16:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' how influential is vice president's office in Iraq?--[[User:Yerevanci|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="blue">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevanci|<sub>''talk''</sub>]] 16:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*:The most important thing here is not that he is a vice president, but that he is the leader of the Sunnis in government. al-Maliki Seems to be running a purge of all non-Shias using stuff like this. So this is very notable as part of the control battle. [[User:Thue|Thue]] ([[User talk:Thue|talk]]) 19:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Reply to above''': Pretty much irrelevant in that case, as he's a ''former'' vice pres. --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 17:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' - The article, rightly or wrongly, is rated in the "stub" class. I won't go into details just yet, but I see some possible BLP disputes in the article, and if it is put on the front page as it appears as of my posting, there could be issues. Strongly suggest anyone thinking of making a !vote here take a careful look at the article. [[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] 16:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Pending a sufficient update. Also per Activism, and I hope what Medeis has mentioned has been addressed! --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 17:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. Top story in various media outlets, including Spanish-language websites. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA|talk]]) 17:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. This seems to be a part of the Sunni-Shia battle for control of the power in Iraq's government. From the context of what seems to be a systematic purge by al-Maliki, it is probably made-up charges, but who knows. In any case very notable, more from al-Hashimi being the leader of the Sunni fraction than from him being the Vice President. [[User:Thue|Thue]] ([[User talk:Thue|talk]]) 19:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Ready''' - marking as ready. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 20:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted'''. --[[User:BorgQueen|BorgQueen]] ([[User talk:BorgQueen|talk]]) 20:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong postmortem support''' — Good God Iraq, please do something about your [[Nouri al-Maliki|Prime Minister]] ASAP. He's stoking the flames of sectarian conflict. Don't let your country descend into war yet again! [[User:Kurtis|Kurtis]] ([[User talk:Kurtis|talk]]) 23:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
* ''' Definite Support''' No questions about it, as a former president and humanitarian that recently passed away. He a left lasting legacy and impact on the world. -- [[User:Rager7|<span style="background-color: red; color: blue">Rager7</span>]] ([[User talk:Rager7|talk]]) |
|||
==September 8== |
|||
* '''Support blurb''' - obviously. No quality concerns as its a GA. --[[User:Estar8806|estar8806]] ([[User talk:Estar8806|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/Estar8806 |★]] 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2012 September 8]]}} |
|||
* '''Support blurb''' The death of a former US President is notable, and the story is being reported by basically every source. [[User:Gust Justice|Gust Justice]] ([[User talk:Gust Justice|talk]]) 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{|{{Portal:Current events/2012 September 8}} |
|||
:'''Strong support blurb''' - A bit more of an update is needed, and a few floating "is" etc are still about, but obviously this should be a blurb. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 21:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:These seem to have been fixed. [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::'''Strong support -''' Death of a former president. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 21:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: '''Strong support blurb''' Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. - [[User:Sebbog13|Sebbog13]] ([[User talk:Sebbog13|talk]]) 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: '''Strong support blurb''' Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. – <span style="font-family: Georgia;">'''''[[User:Illegitimate Barrister|Illegitimate Barrister]]'''''</span> ([[User_talk:Illegitimate_Barrister|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Illegitimate Barrister|contribs]]), 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Strong Support blurb''' - I've been vocal about the US-bias of many nominations here. But this is a no-brainer. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 21:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Strong support blurb''' This should be an uncontroversial one. No quality concerns. May he rest in peace. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 21:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support blurb''' no brainer, article is in good shape '''''[[User:Dora the Axe-plorer|Dora the Axe-plorer]]''''' ([[User talk:Dora the Axe-plorer|explore]]) 21:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''', Normally against US-bias but I think this is a fairly straightforward yes to a blurb here. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the King!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb with picture''' - extraordinarily influential figure, especially given his prolonged and impactful post-presidential career. [[User:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">'''PCN02WPS'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/PCN02WPS|<span style="color:grey;">contribs</span>]])</small> 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb''' Article is updated and a GA. [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted blurb''' [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Is it a caching error? I don't see it. -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 21:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::It should be there now. I couldn't see it earlier either. [[User:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">Star</span><span style="color: purple">action</span>]] ([[User_talk:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contribs/Staraction|<span style="color: purple">contribs</span>]]) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' per above. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb/picture blurb''' GA article of a significant U.S. president. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Added altblurb2''' -- {{tooltip|AFAICT|as far as I can tell}} we usually say "president of X" not "X president", e.g. right now with Manmohan Singh. [[User:Giraffer|Giraffer]] ([[User talk:Giraffer|talk]]) 21:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Thanks for the correction! [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support''' I think it's pretty evident; rest well. [[User:BaronNishi|Nishi]] ([[User talk:BaronNishi|talk]] 21:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support blurb with picture''', but suggest the following expansion to honor what he described as his most important legacy:{{tqb|''[[Nobel Peace Prize|Nobel Peace]] laureate and former U.S. President '''[[Jimmy Carter]]''', behind the [[eradication of dracunculiasis|campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis]], dies at 100.''}} [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 21:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Weak oppose''' only the part mentioning dracunculiasis, since it's only briefly mentioned once in the target article. '''Support''' everything else. [[User:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">Star</span><span style="color: purple">action</span>]] ([[User_talk:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contribs/Staraction|<span style="color: purple">contribs</span>]]) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I'm adding more; it's probably his most important work in terms of overall impact, but nobody's heard of it. Carter, along with [[Viktor Zhdanov]], is probably one of two human beings who can claim credit for eradicating a major disease. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 21:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::(BTW this isn't me saying this, it's Carter—seeing them dead was [https://www.vox.com/2015/8/20/9182531/jimmy-carter-guinea-worm his last wish].) [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 01:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Post-posting - [[User:Queen of Hearts|charlotte]], would you be willing to also add "Nobel laureate" to the blurb, as suggested by the blurbs listed? [[User:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">Star</span><span style="color: purple">action</span>]] ([[User_talk:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contribs/Staraction|<span style="color: purple">contribs</span>]]) 21:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I don't think him being a Nobel laureate is significant enough (relative to him being president) to include in the blurb, but happy to add it/have it added if consensus here/one of the ITN admins think it should be there. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 22:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::That was the blurb supported by everybody? '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 22:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose on quality''' (but its been posted so too late for this) - the article does not provide a reason why he was a great or major figure - even though I know this should be the case. The Legacy section addresses his mediocere presidency but does not touch on his post-presidency efforts which is where this factor is coming from. I know this can be made, either from existing sources or from the obits coming out, but this should really be in place, a crystal clear section for reader to review of why a person was posted as a blurb on death, rather than all the hand-waving that is going on. Also, we should not be assuming that every former world leader should be blurbed. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 21:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Your wishes are demanding. '''Support''' addition of Nobel Prize laureate, only presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Barack Obama, Al Gore (Vice) are recipients. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 22:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The final paragraph of the lede & the lengthy [[Jimmy Carter#Post-presidency (1981–2024)|Post-presidency (1981–2024) section]] do a fine enough job articulating his post-presidency efforts that opposing posting altogether is a bit much. That said, there is a lot of information in [[Post-presidency of Jimmy Carter]] which could be used to further expand the section on his main biographical page. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::The statement in the lede "but his post-presidency period (the longest in U.S. history) has received near-universal praise, including a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002." is not directly supported by sources in the bio article, though I'm sure the post-presidency article has that. This is a quality issue that should have been addressed before posting; I'm not doubting this, but absence of this type of information with sources on the main bio page ''is'' a problem even if that seems apparently obvious. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 04:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''' RIP. [[User:Davey2116|Davey2116]] ([[User talk:Davey2116|talk]]) 22:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' for it being posted. Storied career, amazing, that he had such long marriage. [[User:BilboBeggins|BilboBeggins]] ([[User talk:BilboBeggins|talk]]) 22:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''', at least he made it to 100. [[User:Sahaib|Sahaib]] ([[User talk:Sahaib|talk]]) 23:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Can Nobel laureate be added to the blurb as the nomination that all the support votes at the time of posting were referencing? Carters post-presidency is widely regarded as a defining trait of his life. '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 03:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support addition of Nobel laureate''', as this is prominently noted, often in the headlines, for major media sources covering this death. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 03:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''': Rest in peace to an incredible man, while not the most spectacular during his presidency, he definitely shaped a shining legacy after leaving office. Carter will continue to live on as one of the most memorable presidents the United States has ever had. [[User:Tofusaurus|Tofusaurus]] ([[User talk:Tofusaurus|talk]]) 03:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''' Article is in good shape, has been updated to the bone and Carter is an example of what warrants a death blurb. Remarkable legacy, treated harshly by history. Rest well, to a great humanitarian and humble being. '''Support adding Nobel to blurb''' I mean, he's also a nobel winner and most obits are including his laureate status to their headlines as well. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 08:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Added Nobel laureate'''. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 08:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{ping|Queen of Hearts}} please could you revert this. You were correct in your comment above. There is a standard format for death blurbs, particularly of former leaders, and we don't usually "editorialise" in ITN blurbs. Him being the preskdent is the reason he's blurbed rather than his Nobel prize, and it should simply state that, in the same way as the former Indian PM further down. Cheers — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 08:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::That isn’t editorializing and since when did we substitute an admins judgment over consensus for a blurb? '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 09:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::It's totally editorializing. Inserting fluff about Carter winning a Nobel prize that isn't really relevant to the story of his death. To maintain NPOV and avoid bias at ITN, we stick to a standard blurb format for all politician deaths rather than going with bespoke wording for individuals that people happen to like, based on whatever random [[WP:LOCALCONSENSUS]] forms. Henry Kissinger also won a Nobel prize, but our [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&oldid=1187974208 blurb on him] made no mention of that, so why the difference here? Admins are precisely supposed to use their judgment in these matters, as indeed charlotte did above, that's always been part of the remit. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 10:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::I have to agree with Amakuru, no need to add extra honours when its the office that he held that the vast majority of the world know him for. We didn't list Singh with his Indian of the Year or his Adam Smith awards so why do we need to further decorate Carter when President is prestigious enough. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the King!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 11:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Removed the Nobel. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 12:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::To be fair, the Adam Smith Prize or the Indian of the Year honor is not even close to the Nobel Prize. When [[Kofi Annan]] died, we [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&oldid=855638845 listed his Nobel honor] into the blurb. Same with [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&oldid=741794257 Shimon Peres]. [[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::That isn’t fluff, and there isn’t any overriding consensus that you can point to to claim that this is a local one that can be ignored. This is one of his main legacies, his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency. It is not fluff, it is not editorializing, and that part of the main page is not the fiefdom of a few admins here. This should be restored and this discussions consensus respected. '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 12:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::Even if {{tq|his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency}}, a questionable premise, he would be notable for that and not for being a Nobel prize laureate. Look at the first sentence of his article as it's always been: Only mentions president (and later humanitarian), no mention of Nobel laureate. The article itself indicates that being a laureate wasn't notable at all in comparison to what he's actually primarily known for, which is a president of the United States. Therefore (imo), saying that he's a Nobel prize laureate in ITN would indeed fall under UNDUE editorializing fluff. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 02:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::{{tq|1=Only mentions president (and later humanitarian)}}<br>So... it mentions the work that earned him the Nobel Prize. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 02:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::::He's notable for his work as a president and a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate or the receiver or any other prizes (or otherwise) that resulted from his work as a president and a humanitarian. If you want to push for adding in the blurb that he was a humanitarian, be my guest. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 02:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::::[[#c-BD2412-20241230173700-Masem-20241230130900|Its almost as if your point hadn’t been proven false before your first response here]] '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 03:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::::My point is that if the article indicates that Carter's notable for first being a president, and second being a humanitarian, ITN should reflect that and not go off on its own bizarre mini RFCs to establish local consensus about Carter's notability outside of the article's talk page. If you want to establish that Carter was as notable for being a Nobel lauereate as he was for being the president of the United States or a humanitarian, then first get that changed in the first sentence of the article and then come back here and have the blurb reflect this change. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 04:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::Every death blurb (for death by old age or other natural causes) leaves it as the principle profession that the person had, and avoids editorization. Definitely should not be adding "Nobel winner" here.<span id="Masem:1735564162709:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*:::And just to add, keeping the death blurb to just the profession prevents further bickering around the whole death blurb nomination aspect already. The inclusion of profession and profession only is a nice neutral way to present the blurb without trying to fight consensus on what other apsects to include. If the article is of good quality, other key factors (like Carter's humanitarism) should be identified within the lede.<span id="Masem:1735565861467:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*:::That isn’t true as demonstrated by the examples cited already. Whatever, this place doesn’t exactly abide by our rules anyway, what’s one more example? '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 13:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::: For the record, media reporting on the death widely reference the Nobel Prize in what would be the equivalent of our blurb. See: |
|||
*:::* ''Reuters'': "[https://www.reuters.com/world/us/jimmy-carter-former-us-president-nobel-peace-prize-recipient-dead-100-atlanta-2024-12-29/ Jimmy Carter, former US president and Nobel Peace Prize recipient, dead at 100]" |
|||
*:::* ''ABC News'' leads with "[https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/former-president-jimmy-carter-celebrated-champion-human-rights/story?id=3330353 Jimmy Carter, the former U.S. president known as a champion of international human rights both during and after his White House tenure and who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his lifetime of dedication to that cause, has died at 100]"; |
|||
*:::* ''The Washington Post'' leads with "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/12/29/jimmy-carter-death/ Jimmy Carter, a no-frills Southern governor with a mile-wide smile who was elected president in 1976 and served only one term before leading an extraordinary post-presidential life that included the Nobel Peace Prize, died Sunday at his home in Plains, Georgia...]"; |
|||
*:::* ''BBC News'' reports, "[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpww85w5p30o after leaving the White House with low approval ratings, his reputation was restored through humanitarian work which earned him the Nobel Peace Prize]"; |
|||
*:::* ''The Guardian'' reports that "[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/dec/29/jimmy-carter-death-president-reactions-latest-updates Carter spent the decades afterward focused on international relations and human rights, efforts that won him the Nobel peace prize in 2002]"; |
|||
*:::* The Associated Press blurb on the subject says "[https://apnews.com/article/jimmy-carter-dies-18c198c20352c835bca3eec276020dd7 Former President Jimmy Carter, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and the longest-living chief executive in U.S. history, has died]". |
|||
*::: This is not fluff, this is the key fact. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 17:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post posting support blurb''' No brainer support for death of former head of state/government. News across the world, article is in fantastic shape. Cheers, ''atque supra''! [[User:Fakescientist8000|Fake]][[User talk:Fakescientist8000|scientist]][[Special:Contributions/Fakescientist8000|8000]] 13:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' inclusion of '''Nobel Prize''' and agree with other supporters above, his article quotes {{xt|Polls of historians and political scientists generally rank Carter as a below-average president. Scholars and the public more favorably view his post-presidency}}, and winning a noble prize precisely shows this with other things. It may seem editorializing to few, but many disagree. [[User:ExclusiveEditor|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF7043,#FFCC80);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-left-radius:6px;border-bottom-left-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;">Exclusive</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#263238,#37474F);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-right-radius:6px;border-bottom-right-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:-1px;">Editor</span>]] [[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|<sub style="font-size:11px;color:#757575;font-style:italic;letter-spacing:.5px;">🔔 Ping Me!</sub>]] 17:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' This was closed, who reopened it? Can someone re-close it? Further blurb deliberation should be at [[WP:ERRORS]]. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 17:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:This is an editorial decision, not a content error.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 19:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Significant blurb changes are at ITNC. Errors are used only for small corrections.<span id="Masem:1735586159648:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 19:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Support including something about the humanitarian post-presidency career''' (e.g. the Nobel), which is ''the'' thing Carter is known for. It would make more sense to cut out the presidency TBH. (Though I wouldn't do that either). [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 19:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''': all blurbs in this widely-supported nomination mention the Nobel Peace Prize, showing a ''very'' clear consensus for its inclusion. So why are we unilaterally ''not'' including it? [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 21:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Adding my '''support''' for including "Nobel Peace Prize laureate" in the blurb; his post-presidency was arguably as transformative as his time as president, and has received comparable RS coverage in the obits. Given that all the proposed blurbs included the Nobel, I did not feel the need to state this in my !vote above. [[User:Davey2116|Davey2116]] ([[User talk:Davey2116|talk]]) 22:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' mention of Nobel Prize per Amakuru as it is editorializing the blurb to choose to add that secondary piece of info, which wasn’t included in Henry Kissinger’s blurb. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<span style="color:#D60047">B</span><span style="color:#F0A000">zw</span><span style="color:#00A300">ee</span><span style="color:#0A47FF">bl</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 05:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{ec}} '''Restored Nobel''' to the blurb. It's been in the blurb candiates from the beginning, and there is consensus since the post for its inclusion. As mentioned above with Annan and Peres previously, it's not unprecedented. In other fields, I also see some recent examples beyond a simple listing of their occupation.[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=1155978548][https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=1218115233] This is not required, and there are merits to avoiding squabbles with a more vanilla blurb. But there's no current rule at [[WP:ITN]] barring it, and the community can apply [[WP:WEIGHT]], where needed, as was done here. This is consistent with the [[WP:YESPOV]] policy: {{tq2|As such, the neutral point of view does not mean the exclusion of certain points of view; rather, it means including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight.}}—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 05:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The community establishes WP:WEIGHT in the article's talk page, not in ITN. The article indicates that Carter is first and foremost notable for being a president and secondarily as a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate. If ITN doesn't directly reflect that's written in the corresponding article, this sets a ridiculous precedent where anything can be written in ITN blurbs so long as there is local consensus for it here (if tomorrow we'll have a blurb that Carter has come back to life while the article's obviously unchanged, and enough people vote for that blurb, would that also be posted?) ITN discussions have significantly less editorial rigor and oversight than an actual article talk page, and shouldn't be the place to make substantive arguments about content, especially ones that very clearly would not, and have not, passed in the article's talk page itself (e.g. in this case that Carter's Nobel prize is anywhere near as notable as his occupation as a president). [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 06:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::{{tq|this sets a ridiculous precedent|q=yes}}: I had written, "This is not required". This blurb, in itself, does not set a precedent, any more than Annon or Peres did. The community is free to update [[WP:ITNBLURB]] to provide more guidance to posters on blurbs w.r.t. article leads, if there is consensus. Regards. —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 07:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::He was a noted humanitarian, not a Nobel prize winner. And which Nobel anyways? Explains nothing about what the prize was for. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 09:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::The blurb says <u>Nobel Peace</u>. Nobody had proposed ''humanitarian'' in the blurb, but feel free to gain consensus whether it makes more sense to be generic. —[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 09:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''' for inclusion of some mention of his post-presidency humanitarian efforts, whether that means mentioning the Nobel Peace Prize or some other language. (I already !voted so this second !vote is only on the language and not the notability or quality.) It isn't a double standard that we didn't mention this for Kissinger. It was simply less relevant for Kissinger and more relevant for Carter. The post-presidency work Carter did to earn that Nobel was arguably more transformative than anything he did in his role as president, so mentioning it separately from his presidency makes sense. The same can't be said of Kissinger. I'd still be fine with replacing the word Nobel Laureate with the word humanitarian since some editors take issue with the decoration, but I'm also fine with just leaving it how it is right now and keeping the Nobel Laureate phrasing. Just as long as the phrasing acknowledges that this is a unique case where him being the president was perhaps not even the most important thing he did with his life. This isn't setting a dangerous precedent or slippery slope, he legitimately may be the only president in US history and one of few leaders worldwide who left the highest office in the land and then went on to do bigger and better things after that. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 14:26, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:{{tq|simply less relevant for Kissinger}} is an opinion and the double standard here. Both individuals won a Nobel prize, and the articles of both individuals indicate that neither are notable for receiving that Nobel prize. The only discernible difference is personal opinion in ITN. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 15:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::It ''would'' be a double standard if my position was that the Nobel Prize is itself inherently blurbworthy, but that isn't my view. It's worth mentioning separately for Carter because the reason ''why'' he received the award was for noteworthy contributions separate from his presidency. Kissinger's award was for his official duties as the Secretary of State, not for something separate. It's not about liking Carter more than Kissinger. For transparency I also won't deny that myself and likely many others ''do'' hold Carter in higher regard than Kissinger, but this isn't relevant to the discussion or the reasoning. It's simply about communicating that Carter's post-presidency is at least half of the reason why he's blurbworthy, even to those who are against blurbing just any former US president. With Kissinger, his time as Secretary of State was the sole reason. As I said before, I'm fine with replacing the award with the word humanitarian if it looks too decorative. I just don't take issue with the current wording. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 16:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Yeah, then say humanitarian, not nobel laureate. Ok, it looks like this isn't going to change, but this is an error that'll come back to bite us the next time somebody decides to editorialize some other news event. [[User:Spintheer|spintheer]] ([[User talk:Spintheer|talk]]) 16:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== Remove Ongoing: 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon |
|||
<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = <!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| ongoing = rem <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = <!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Khuft <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = The Ongoing section would benefit from some shortening, and this item seems like the best candidate for removal. The Israeli incursion in Lebanon is not in the news anymore (and the last event mentioned in the article dates back to 17 Dec). This is in contrast to the war in Gaza, or Israel's actions in Yemen, which are much more prominently covered in global news. <!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Khuft|Khuft]] ([[User talk:Khuft|talk]]) 19:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
:'''Support removing'''—looks like the most sensible thing to trim. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 23:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Strong oppose''' the only reason nothing is happening is because the [[2024 Israel–Lebanon ceasefire agreement]] is in place. However than will end soon as it is only a 60 day ceasefire. 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) [[User:History6042|<span style="color:darkorange">History6042😊</span>]] '''([[User talk:History6042|<span style="color:blue">Contact me</span>]])''' 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:If it ends and the war restarts, we post again [[User:PrecariousWorlds|PrecariousWorlds]] ([[User talk:PrecariousWorlds|talk]]) 07:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''': Im wondering if maybe we need to do a () next to [[Israel-Hamas war]] with all of the other Middle East battles that are also involving Israel, like Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, so on. [[User:TheCorriynial|TheCorriynial]] ([[User talk:TheCorriynial|talk]]) 20:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::There was a recent suggestion to include the entire listing of conflicts in the Middle East, but the problem is that they are not all directly related. While we can point to the Israel-Lebonon conflict as directly related to the Israel-Hamas one, events in Yemen or Syria are absolutely not part of that. That makes it all synthesis to combine them all. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 21:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support removing''', no updates recently. [[User:BilboBeggins|BilboBeggins]] ([[User talk:BilboBeggins|talk]]) 22:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support removing''' This is no longer hot, as indicated by lack of recent updates. There are low intensity incidents happening and might continue for months, but does not justify "Ongoing". [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 02:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Strong oppose''' not only has Israel violated the ceasefire almost every single day its been in force, but there is no signs that they are going to continue the ceasefire after its 60 days. [[User:Scu ba|<span style="color: red">'''Scu'''</span>]][[User talk:Scu ba|<span style="color:blue">ba</span>]] 15:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Ongoing is not about if the event is still going on, but if the target article or an appropriate subarticle has been receiving updates, which has not been happening here.<span id="Masem:1735572289131:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 15:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Support removal''' Lack of recent updates; per nom. If hostilities resume after the ceasefire, this can be re-nominated for addition at that time. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082529">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 06:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) Houston Tornado Outbreak ==== |
|||
{{Atop|Good faith nom, but clear consensus against. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 23:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article=Tornado outbreak of December 28–29, 2024|image=File:December 28, 2024, storm clouds 02.jpg |
|||
| blurb= Tornado outbreak in the Houston Area killing 2 people and injuring many others |
|||
| altblurb= 2 people dead after tornado outbreak in the Houston area}} |
|||
* <s>'''Support''' but with a completely reworded blurb. Three or more are dead, so the blurb is innacurate. How about "At least three people are killed during '''[[Tornado outbreak of December 28–29, 2024|a widespread tornado outbreak]]''' across the [[Southern United States]]." I oppose adding an image as of now.</s> |
|||
::Meh. '''oppose''' per below. [[User:EF5|<span style="color:#A188FC;">'''E'''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:EF5|<span style="color:#A188FC;">'''F'''</span>]]</sub><sup>[[User:EF5/Creations|<span style="color:#A188FC;">'''5'''</span>]]</sup> 20:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose'''. Seems pretty minor, hard to find coverage outside the US media. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 20:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong oppose''' - not important overall. {{ping|EF5}} we hardly post tornado outbreaks on ITN, and the smallest one I think that got posted was Rolling Fork's outbreak. The most recent was March 31, 2023, and almost every outbreak since then (with the possible exceptions of May 25 and April 26) have been well below the bar of importance for ITN. I'll add '''conditional weak support''' if the record-breaking claim of the Port Arthur tornado's duration is confirmed, but I highly doubt that. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 20:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Not significant, at least not yet. Very minor. '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 20:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' The oddness here is how late in the year this came, likely a result of global warming, but even with that, the relatively small death toll makes this a minor outbreak in the larger scheme of things. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 21:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Late-season outbreaks have always happened. We posted the last big December outbreak ([[Tornado outbreak of December 10-11, 2021|the one in Kentucky, USA]]) on merit as an outbreak, not based on climate change. I couldn't tell you why actual climate-change related blurbs (such as the yearly "hottest day in history" blurbs) never get posted. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 21:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::Because as long as there's little progress to stall climate change by major nations, these records are always going to get broken year after year. And the 2021 outbreak was likely posted due to the high death toll (70+).<span id="Masem:1735511037173:WikipediaFTTCLNIn_the_news/Candidates" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 22:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*'''Strong Oppose''' Tragic, but it’s a typical tornado outbreak. Two deaths is very small compared to very notable tornado outbreaks like the 2011 Super Outbreak. '''[[User:INeedSupport|<span style="color:#00FF00"><big>I</big></span>]]<span style="color:#C0C0C0">Need</span>[[User_talk:INeedSupport|<span style="color:#FF0000">Support</span>]]''' 🎄 21:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{Abot}} |
|||
==== 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis |
|||
| image = Tbilisi - election protests 28 October 2024.jpg<!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis]]''' continues with [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] inaugurated and [[Salome Zourabichvili]] claiming to remain [[President of Georgia|President]].<!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| altblurb = '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis]]''' continues with [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] inaugurated while [[Salome Zourabichvili]] says she remains [[President of Georgia|President]].<!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = Amidst '''[[2024–2025 Georgian post-election protests|opposition protests]]''', [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] inaugurated [[President of Georgia]]. |
|||
|altblurb3 = '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis|A governmental crisis]]''' occurs in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]], as [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] is inaugurated as [[President of Georgia|president]] while incumbent [[Salome Zourabichvili]] intends to remain in office. |
|||
|altblurb4 = [[Mikheil Kavelashvili]] is inaugurated as [[President of Georgia]] while incumbent [[Salome Zourabichvili]] intends to remain in office amidst '''[[2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis|a constitutional crisis]]'''. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/29/new-georgian-president-sworn-in-as-predecessor-refuses-to-stand-aside ''Al Jazeera'']; [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/29/georgia-president-sworn-in-protests-zourabichvili-kavelashvili ''The Guardian'']; [https://apnews.com/article/georgia-president-zourabichvili-russia-kavelashvili-215020983cefb6ce1eb2ecad184a9c1e Associated Press]; [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rn2w0zw08o ''BBC'']<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Boud <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = Boud<!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = The [[2024–2025 Georgian post-election protests]] that have accompanied this crisis have been ongoing daily for two months with the biggest participation estimated at around 100,000 people - several percent of the total Georgian population.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 11:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
* ''Comment'' The expression "claiming that" is a bit [[WP:WEASEL]]ly; {{tq|and [[Salome Zourabichvili]] stating that she retains her legitimacy as [[President of Georgia|President]]}} would be more neutral, avoiding the connotation that Wikipedia is sceptical about her POV. I've added ''altblurb'' which seems less weaselly to me. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 11:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Ongoing?''' The nomination is not clear whether it's proposing this as an ongoing entry. Many other places have ongoing political tensions and rivalries so I reckon we need some big incident or civil war for this to stand out. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 12:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The event itself - the overall crisis - is ongoing, but the Western mainstream media news coverage is not intense enough to justify ''ongoing'' in the ITN sense. This is not a proposal for ITN "Ongoing". In terms of the wording, it would be inaccurate to suggest that today's inauguration was a sudden crisis - it's a key symbolic event within the overall crisis - so "continuing" in the blurb is accurate. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 12:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Definitely has more encyclopedic value than the electoral college vote a few weeks earlier. Depending on how the world reacts, it could be a repeat of the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. [[User:Scaramouche33|Scaramouche33]] ([[User talk:Scaramouche33|talk]]) 13:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong Oppose''' There is a similar [[Constitutional crisis#Somalia|'''Ongoing''']] [[constitutional crisis in Somalia]], [[WP:ITNUPDATE]]. [[User:QalasQalas|QalasQalas]] ([[User talk:QalasQalas|talk]]) 16:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Response''' Somalia has been in a civil war for decades now, it has gotten its place in the spotlight but has faded away with time. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 19:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''<strike>strong</strike> weak support altblurb2''' came here to nominate it, glad to see I was beaten to it. The inauguration is perhaps more important than the non-popular election itself with the repercussions per Scaramouche33 (day-before form PM and GD leader was sanctioned with many other by the state department). What the now former president claims is not relevant ''encyclopaedically''/ITN. It is for the sub-article/s though. <strike>She'll likely be arrested before the new year if not tonight. It's 21:15 atm.</strike> [https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2024/12/29/salome-zourabichvili-vacates-georgias-presidential-palace-as-her-replacement-is-inaugurated-en-news Doesn't seem like much more than western msm blather quoting a french woman, she has left the presidential palace], despite [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/27/lets-see-who-will-be-leaving-georgias-presidential-standoff-nears-crunch-point claiming there is a train there and who will move her].[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 17:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Support''' Definitely something to take note of. Additionally, I suspect Russia might invade Georgia again, to prop up the Dream Party. [[User:SimpleSubCubicGraph|SimpleSubCubicGraph]] ([[User talk:SimpleSubCubicGraph|talk]]) 19:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support altblurb 3''' per above. Added altblurb 3. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::''oppose'' '''altblurb3''' she has left the presidential palace. She cannot conduct an enforeceable actions such as signing bills.[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak support''' No one knows who the president of georgia is now, but it is an inauguration '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::everybody knows who the new prez is after being sworn in with his predecessor leaving the presidential palace.[[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Leaving [[Orbeliani Palace]] has some but not much significance; it's not ''the'' presidential palace, it's ''a'' presidential palace; Zourabichvili was the first president to reside there: [https://agenda.ge/en/news/2018/2530 "Salome Zurabishvili to relocate Presidential Residence from Avlabari to Orbeliani Palace", 29 Nov 2018]. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 01:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Important enough in the context of cold war between East and West. Georgia is one of the battlegrounds. [[User:Tradedia|<span style="color:#ffffff;background:black;">Tradedia</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tradedia|talk]]</sup> 02:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak support''' Article is a bit short for a leadership dispute of this magnitude, but it's good enough for posting. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 08:42, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:'''Support''' Per TDKR. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 13:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::@admins, please, check the consensus. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
====(Posted) Jeju Air Flight 2216==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate|article=Jeju Air Flight 2216|image=File:Boeing 737-8AS Jeju Air HL8088 3012 (MSN 37541) Cheongju Intl Airport May 14, 2021.jpg |
|||
|blurb=A Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 '''[[Jeju Air Flight 2216|crashes]]''' at [[Muan International Airport]], South Korea, after hitting a fence while attempting to land with 47 casualties reported out of 181 passengers on board.|altblurb=At least 47 people are killed when a Jeju Air plane carrying 181 passengers '''[[Jeju Air Flight 2216|crashed]]''' at [[Muan International Airport]] in South Korea.|altblurb2='''[[Jeju Air Flight 2216]]''' crashes at [[Muan International Airport]], South Korea, killing at least 47.|sources=[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-29/plane-crashes-at-s-korea-airport-killing-at-least-23-yonhap?utm_source=website&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy (Bloomberg)]|creator=Dora the Axe-plorer|nominator=QalasQalas|nom cmt=I think it needs a bit of work.}} |
|||
*'''Support''' Absolutely horrific footage, definitely worthy of the front page. --[[User:MaximumMangoCloset|MaximumMangoCloset]] ([[User talk:MaximumMangoCloset|talk]]) 02:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' holiday season is deadly this year. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 02:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Terrible year for Korea [[User:PrecariousWorlds|PrecariousWorlds]] ([[User talk:PrecariousWorlds|talk]]) 11:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Absolutely three deadly crashes within a month. [[User:QalasQalas|QalasQalas]] ([[User talk:QalasQalas|talk]]) 02:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' A no brainer, major plane crash with dozens of fatalities. [[User:JDiala|JDiala]] ([[User talk:JDiala|talk]]) 02:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support Alt Blurb III''' Article probably needs its quality improved, but absolutely a notable event. [[User:RandomInfinity17|RandomInfinity17]] <small>([[User talk:RandomInfinity17|talk]] - [[Special Contributions/RandomInfinity17|contributions]])</small> 02:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support Alt Blurb II''' in line with the Flight 8243. Also, the death toll has reportly risen to 47. [[User:Unnamelessness|Unnamelessness]] ([[User talk:Unnamelessness|talk]]) 02:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Considering that if the death count ends up being over 132 it will have been the deadliest crash since 2020, this is quite a major incident and it deserves to be here. (offtopic but why was both the start and end of this year so bad for aviation?) <span style="background:#000dff; padding:2px;">'''[[User:Interstatefive|<span style="color:white;">interstate</span>]][[User talk:Interstatefive|<span style="color:white;">five</span>]]''' </span> 02:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' could become the deadliest crash this year with 178 possible fatalities and its already the second deadliest. [[User:Bloxzge 025|Bloxzge 025]] [[User talk:Bloxzge 025|(talk)]] 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST) |
|||
*'''Strong Support''' Dozens of fatalities have been found. Major news coverage. Article is a bit short but that is because there is no conclusive info yet, as the incident happened three hours ago. [[User:Wildfireupdateman|Wildfireupdateman]] [[User talk:Wildfireupdateman|(talk)]] 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST) |
|||
*'''Support''' seems to have extensive coverage from South Korean News sources, some western sources are also picking up on the accident. [[User:Yosh56|Yosh56]] [[User talk:Yosh56|(talk)]] 10:02 PM. 28 December 2024 (EST) |
|||
*'''Strong support altblurb 2'''. For a new disaster article less than half an hour old it's of fantastic quality. This might be less geopolitically important than the crash in Kazakhstan but the human toll is telling. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 03:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' Altburlb II Fatality numbers can be updated via [[WP:ERRORS#Errors with "In the news"]]. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 03:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== December 28 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 28]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 28}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== |
==== RD: Shigeko Sasamori ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Shigeko Sasamori |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| article2 = <!-- Do not wikilink - leave blank if nominating only one article --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/28/world/asia/shigeko-sasamori-dead.html NYT] |
|||
| blurb = [[South Korea]]n director [[Kim Ki-duk]] wins the [[Golden Lion]] at the '''[[69th Venice International Film Festival|2012 Venice Film Festival]]''' for his film ''[[Pietà (film)|Pietà]]''. |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| sources = [http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/08/uk-venice-winner-idUKBRE8870C420120908] |
|||
| |
| nominator = TJMSmith |
||
| |
| updaters = |
||
| nom cmt = Survivor of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and an advocate for peace and nuclear disarmament. Died on December 15. Death reported on December 28. |
|||
| nominator = JuneGloom07 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] ([[User talk:TJMSmith|talk]]) 02:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| updater = Egeymi |
|||
| updater2 = |
|||
| updater3 = |
|||
| ITNR = yes |
|||
| note = |
|||
| nom cmt = I'm not too sure which link should be bold; the director, the film, the award or the festival? |
|||
| sign = --[[User:JuneGloom07|<font color="Purple" face="Arial">'''JuneGloom'''</font>]] [[User_Talk:JuneGloom07|<font color="Green" face="Times New Roman">Talk</font>]] 18:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
::Bold the film and the festival. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|And the horse]]</sup> 09:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment'''. Embolden the festival itself. I'm probably leaning towards supporting this one on the main page; the Venice festival is probably #2 in the world after Cannes but unlike the awards given at that one, the Golden Lion is more of a "lifetime achievement" which sets it apart. If it's deemed that there's been too many culture or film items then this'll probably stumble though. [[User:Grapple X|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''GRAPPLE'''</small></span>]] [[User talk:Grapple X|<span style="color:#556655"><small>'''X'''</small></span>]] 18:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', this significant art event is an opportunity to include something different (but notable) on the main page.[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 19:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Conditional support''' per ITN/R. Venice is #3 after Cannes and TIFF. Conditional due to lack of prose. Boiler plate lead and a brief summary of the competition section. Maybe bold Pieta, which is a little better. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 20:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Wrong, Venice is #2 after Cannes, with Berlin #3. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|And the horse]]</sup> 08:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::It doesn't really matter, but regarding TIFF, ''Variety magazine acknowledged that "the Festival is second only to Cannes in terms of high-profile pics, stars and market activity."''. Mostly I'm just making a plug for the home team :). TIFF doesn't have a "winner" so there is nothing really to post when it ends. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 11:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Not a significant event to be featured on the main page.--[[User:Yerevanci|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="blue">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevanci|<sub>''talk''</sub>]] 22:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**FWIW it's an ITN/R item. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 01:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Conditional support''' per IP98. It is of global significance and recognised at ITN/R. News about arts are very rare, so it would be great for balance. Is a pitty the articles are in such sorry state. Would also unlink South Korea from the blurb as the least relevant wikilink of five. --<small>[[User:Elekhh|ELEKHH]]<sup>[[User talk:Elekhh|T]]</sup></small> 03:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*:I forget, what is the current policy on linking countries/nationalities on the main page? I seem to remember a policy that nationalities are always linked. Otherwise '''support'''.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 03:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' One of the big three film festivals and per ITN/R. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|And the horse]]</sup> 08:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
: Posting. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 10:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:No objection to the posting, but the obvious lack of unanimity in the importance of this suggests that it probably should not be at ITN/R: this seems to have gone through primarily not because it is considered important in this discussion, but because someone thought it important in a very short, scarcely commented upon nomination at itn/r. [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 22:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Surely the bickering about the #2/#3 ranking of the Venice festival, and a single oppose !vote, doesn't amount to a lack of consensus? Anyway, I think as per usual as with ITNR items editors may not feel a need to post support !votes. As to how Venice got on ITNR, I'm unfamiliar with the discussion that resulted in its inclusion but it may simply be that it's obviously notable as (by many accounts) the number 2 event in the international film festival calendar. There have been subsequent discussions about which festivals to include and I can't recall a suggestion to drop Venice.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 15:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::Venice is also the oldest international film festival in the world. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|And the horse]]</sup> 18:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== RD: Kari Dziedzic ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Kari Dziedzic |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = The '''[[2012 Summer Paralympics closing ceremony|closing ceremony]]''' of the [[2012 Summer Paralympics]] is held [[Chronological summary of the 2012 Summer Paralympics|after 11 days]] in London. |
|||
| sources = [https://www.mprnews.org/story/2024/12/28/former-minnesota-senate-majority-leader-kari-dziedzic-dies-following-cancer-battle ‘’Minnesota Public Radio’’] |
|||
| nominator = HonorTheKing |
|||
| |
| updated = yes |
||
| |
| nominator = Malvoliox |
||
| updaters = |
|||
| sign = <br /> – ''[[User:HonorTheKing|HonorTheKing]] ([[User talk:HonorTheKing|talk]])'' 06:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = Sitting Minnesota state senator and former majority leader, hoping to expand the article a little/add electoral history and more details about political work, but also want to make sure we can clean up any issues with citations etc. that I didn’t catch. |
|||
| nom cmt = As of this writing, the closing ceremony is tomorrow, but writing it to give people the chance of updating the article to the best possible. In addition to have enough comments before it goes live. |
|||
| sign = '''[[User:Malvoliox|<span style="color: darkgreen">~Malvoliox</span>]]''' ''([[User talk:Malvoliox|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malvoliox|contribs]])'' 14:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
*@[[User:Malvoliox|Malvoliox]], the better source needed tag should ideally be resolved. Otherwise, '''support'''. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 01:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
::Replaced the bad source with a reliable recent one that details the case. '''[[User:Malvoliox|<span style="color: darkgreen">~Malvoliox</span>]]''' ''([[User talk:Malvoliox|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malvoliox|contribs]])'' 15:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' end of a major event with big TV impact of closing ceremony resulting in this being significant news. Regards, [[User:Sun Creator|Sun Creator]]<sup>([[User talk:Sun Creator|talk]])</sup> 10:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:'''comment''' can we add "...[[Chronological summary of the 2012 Summer Paralympics|after 11 days]]"? We can also bold that as its updated and sourced. (i made the suggestion to the blurb above)[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 11:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''oppose'''. We already posted the opening. Also articles are just tables and little prose.--[[Special:Contributions/24.90.93.13|24.90.93.13]] ([[User talk:24.90.93.13|talk]]) 11:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - The opening ceremony was enough. [[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] 16:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}} not a valid reason for opposition. Opening and closing ceremonies of the Summer Olympics 2012 were in ITN.<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 17:00, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - I'm interested to know under what conditions this is less ITN-worthy than the closing of the able-bodied Olympics - what's the difference? [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) 18:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - The opening '''and''' closing ceremonies were both posted for the regular London Olympics, so why should the paralympics not have the closing ceremonies posted? It seems a bit weird to post about an opening ceremony of an event but not about the closing ceremony of the event. [[User:Andise1|Andise1]] ([[User talk:Andise1|talk]]) 18:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support'''. We posted both the opening and closing of the Olympics so why not this? besides I don't remember we posted anything about any event during it and we did not add a sticky as well. So if I was right, then this would only the second ITN post about the Paralympics. <b>[[User:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#ff0000">Mohamed CJ</span>]]</b> [[User talk:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#07517C">(talk)</span>]] 18:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment'''. The fact that we posted the opening and closing ceremonies of the London Olympics is of no relevance. The Summer Olympics, and the men's World Cup, are events of extreme global notability; the paralympics don't come close. We DID post the opening ceremony. We don't have a policy of posting women's events equally with men's events either. For example, we don't post the opening of the Women's World Cup. We almost never post the opening or closing of multisport events, such as the Commonwealth Games, Pan American Games, Asian Games, etc. The Olympics and the World Cup are exceptions due to the level of global notability of those events. Also, 'x-event was already posted' is an extremely common rationale used here to oppose posting an event.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] |
|||
*'''Support'''. No-one seems to be giving a valid reason ''not'' to post this. It's one of the world's major sporting events and the closing ceremony is likely to be major news in several English-speaking countries. Are we supposed to avoid posting out of respect to the proper Olympics or something? [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 20:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Consistency is a valid reason to oppose. We don't post both the closing and opening of the Women's World Cup, the Commonwealth Games, the Euro2012, the Pan -American games, etc.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 01:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' ITN/R states that the opening ceremony for the Paralympic games is ITN/R, but not the closing ceremony. Unfortunately, the Paralympic games receives only a fraction of the worldwide attention that the Olympics gets. I've seen one story about [[Oscar Pistorius]], who is receiving the clear majority of news coverage in these games, on the CNN and BBC headlines, but nothing else at all about Paralympics coverage. I'm not trying to diminish the importance of the event itself, but I think that the opening ceremony is all that needs to be posted to ITN. -- <span style="background:#000000">'''[[User:Anc516|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Anc516</span>]]'''</span> ([[User talk:Anc516|Talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/Anc516|Contribs]]) 20:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:Anc, the fact that you haven't seen much coverage of the games makes it easy to guess where you live, but I don't think it tells us much else. [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 21:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Where I am from, nor where anyone else is from, means nothing to why something should or shouldn't be posted. Even on the BBC.co.uk website, I have yet to see anything besides the opening ceremony, and articles about [[Oscar Pistorius]] (who is on the front of the BBC right now, in a small headline). When the closing ceremony is held tomorrow, I would like to see how much attention it gets before I consider changing my vote. To date, the level of coverage that I have seen from US and Non-US news outlets has consisted of the opening ceremony, Pistorius claiming another runner had an unfair advantage in a race, his gold medal today, and a picture slideshow of the opening ceremony. Other than this, even from non-US news sources, there has either been hardly anything, or it was either buried underneath other stories, or about Pistorius. Here is an example to support my argument: the official Paralympic YouTube channel is one of the largest sources of live and on-demand Paralympic games coverage worldwide, with over 780 hours of coverage. Its most popular video about the 2012 games has 198.8 thousand views. This video is about the opening ceremony. The next most popular video is about Pistorius, with 153.8k views. Third is of a swimming event with 88k views, and the rest are significantly less in terms of views. The opening ceremony was deserving of ITN praise, and Pistorius has also been covered heavily, but otherwise, there hasn't been anything else. If there is a huge buzz about the ceremony tomorrow, I will consider changing my vote. In addition, while the opening ceremony for the games in 2008, and the Winter games in 2010 were posted to ITN, the closing ceremony has never been posted to ITN, and on top of this, as other users have mentioned, the article could be better.. -- <span style="background:#000000">'''[[User:Anc516|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Anc516</span>]]'''</span> ([[User talk:Anc516|Talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/Anc516|Contribs]]) 01:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::FormerIP the fact that you think it's getting that much coverage worldwide probably tells me where you live. Yes, it's getting a lot of pro-British coverage on the BBC; the coverage is markedly lower elsewhere, in Russia an example I can think of .--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 01:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' (though without "is held after 11 days"). The coverage in the U.S. seems to have been anomalously low, in other countries there's been more attention, and in the UK the Paralympics has been a significant proportion of the news cycles. The Paralypics represents the premier competition for dozens of sports and has seen various records and achievements which could have even been ITN items in themselves. An ITN item for the closing seems appropriate. (Would support adding this to ITN/R for what it's worth). [[User:LukeSurl|LukeSurl]]<sup> [[User Talk:LukeSurl|t]] [[Special:Contributions/LukeSurl|c]]</sup> 22:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - as noted above, opening and closing ceremonies of Olympics were posted, I don't see why this shouldn't be posted as well. It's a significant international event watched by millions. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 01:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' I was kind of neutral until I've opened the ceremony article. If it is in such a poor state I highly doubt that the ceremony itself is that notable. [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 01:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Charles Dolan ==== |
|||
*'''Oppose''' As far as I can tell, the Paralympics don't garner the level of attention, coverage, and national comradry all around the world that the Olympics do. The Opening Ceremony was rightfully posted, but I don't think it's necessary to do the same for the closing, even if that's what we do for the Olympics. But perhaps this is something that should be decided upon ''after'' the ceremony; even if the games themselves aren't watched religiously, maybe the closing will be covered extensively. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 01:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Article is in poor shape, I saw no coverage of the Paralympics while it was going on, and see little coverage of the closing ceremonies now. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 01:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| article = Charles Dolan <!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
**You comment suggest your in America(that had little coverage) and not representative of a [[WP:WORLDVIEW]]. Regards, [[User:Sun Creator|Sun Creator]]<sup>([[User talk:Sun Creator|talk]])</sup> 11:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
***I see no evidence that it received world-wide coverage. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| sources = [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/charles-dolan-dead-media-pioneer-hbo-founder-1236095268/ The Hollywood Reporter]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
*'''Support''' We posted the opening ceremony, it seems reasonable to post the closing ceromony too. ITNR does not serve to limit what can be posting, only clarify what should be posted [[User:Quantumsilverfish|Quantumsilverfish]] ([[User talk:Quantumsilverfish|talk]]) 02:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. Yes, the London Olympics' opening and closing ceremonies were posted, but I believe this should be treated case-by-case. The closing ceremony did not receive a lot of coverage, so I don't think it should be posted. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA|talk]]) 06:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| nominator = 240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
::The closing ceremony hasn't actually happened yet, it is premature to judge how much coverage it will receive using the past tense. [[User:Quantumsilverfish|Quantumsilverfish]] ([[User talk:Quantumsilverfish|talk]]) 06:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
:::Ditto, the news is already on al jazeera, btw and in the next 12 hours will likely be higher, but well see. |
|||
| nom cmt = American billionaire businessman, founder of Cablevision and HBO.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
*'''Oppose''': although there has been blanket coverage of any event in which UK athletes have had a chance here, global profile is many notches lower than that of the Olympics, and arguments based on equal rights or the notion that posting the opening ceremony demands posting the closing ceremony are validated by neither practice on ITN nor purpose of the template. The 2012 Paralympics article has had only minor tweaking since we featured it 11 days ago, with the medal table and the controversies[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 12:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC) section as the only substantive additions. '''If posted''': The "chronological summary" linked under the Easter Egg of ''after 11 days'' (which, if retained, needs to be expanded: what 11 days?) is by no means a chronological summary: it is simply a list of gold medallists, with virtually no prose. [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 10:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389|240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389]] ([[User talk:240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389|talk]]) 07:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
::Well its th e same title as the 2012 games that you updated but never had objection too. Format is the same too[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 12:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
:::The format is (or was) the same, but the total lack of prose content means that it can't be described as a chronological summary. [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 21:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*''' |
* '''Support''', article is well-cited and I don't see any quality issues. [[User:Unknown-Tree|Unknown-Tree🌲?]] ([[User talk:Unknown-Tree|talk]]) 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''', article is long enough and well-sourced, with no apparent issues. Could use some spot verification. [[User:Mooonswimmer|Mooonswimmer]] 01:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:''This'' being what? The Paralympics or the Closing Ceremony? Because that latter has not yet happened. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 12:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 01:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
**Considering I am watching it right now, I think you know the answer. Also, nice to see you still stalking me. --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 13:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**:Responding to your post is not stalking.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 18:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment'''. Not much press coverage or public interest in the UK? Do you live in a shed or something? [http://www.frontpagestoday.co.uk/2012/08/30/archive.cfm Here] are the UK front pages the day after the opening ceremony. As you can see, it takes up the ''whole'' of the front page of the Mail, Mirror, Evening Standard, i, Telegraph, Guardian, Independent, Sun and Times. You can also flick through the site, and you'll see that the paralympics have received wall-to-wall front page coverage in the UK throughout the time they have been happenning. |
|||
**Yeah, the coverage in the UK has been very high across TV and press. Regards, [[User:Sun Creator|Sun Creator]]<sup>([[User talk:Sun Creator|talk]])</sup> 11:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:It's fair to say that other countries have not matched the extent of the this coverage but, looking at today's papers, you can see that the Paralympics make the front page of both main Irish newspapers [http://www.frontpagestoday.co.uk/ireland/newspapers.cfm], around half of the South African newspapers [http://www.frontpagestoday.co.uk/south-africa/newspapers.cfm], The Press in New Zealand [http://www.frontpagestoday.co.uk/new-zealand/newspapers.cfm], the Times Colonialist in Canada [http://www.frontpagestoday.co.uk/canada/time-colonist/newspaper.cfm]. Austrlia doesn't really seem to do newspapers on a Sunday, but the Sydney Morning Herald had it on the front page on Thursday [http://www.frontpagestoday.co.uk/australia/sydney-morning-herald/newspaper.cfm?frontpage=20060] and Friday [http://www.frontpagestoday.co.uk/australia/sydney-morning-herald/newspaper.cfm?frontpage=20100]. [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 13:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support but wait''' for obvious reasons. [[User:Simply south|Simply]][[User talk:Simply south| south]]....[[User:Simply south/Poem|..]] ''eating shoes for just 6 years'' 17:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Reluctant oppose''' based on the quality of the article. —[[User talk:WaitingForConnection|WFC]]— 06:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)</s> Opposition stricken due to considerable improvement since I posted. At the time of this posting, a 3–4 sentence expansion of the reception section would probably be enough to remove the orange tags. —[[User talk:WaitingForConnection|WFC]]— <sub>'''[[User:WaitingForConnection/FL wishlist|FL wishlist]]'''</sub> 11:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' A competition with 164 nations all competing is very rare, and therefore makes this a major event. In my opinion this is extremely newsworthy. [[User:CaptRik|CaptRik]] ([[User talk:CaptRik|talk]]) 08:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' before it becomes stale. We didn't have a sticky for this, one of the largest and most prominent sporting events in the world. Let's at least mark the closing. [[User:AlexTiefling|AlexTiefling]] ([[User talk:AlexTiefling|talk]]) 09:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Why people who oppose are indifferent to specially-abled people. They form a significant section of humanity. It is the biggest sporting extravaganza for them to prove that they are no different. Yes, because of the physical disabilities they may not run as fast as Bolt or swim as quickly as Phelps. But, their participation is and will always inspire millions across the globe. And as the saying goes- the winner is not the fastest or the strongest one but one who thinks he can. Should be posted before the article becomes stale.<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 16:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::It is an appalling lack of good faith to level such an accusation against those who have posted valid reasons. I think you owe an apology. [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 20:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::So you're saying that because I oppose the posting of this, I'm being disrespectful to handicapped people? Wow. -- <span style="background:#000000">'''[[User:Anc516|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Anc516</span>]]'''</span> ([[User talk:Anc516|Talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/Anc516|Contribs]]) 03:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' Marked as ready on the basis of consensus.<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 16:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::::::::In that case, I'll remove that ''ready'' tag, because it is not meant to be an indication of consensus, but of the status of the article. Consensus as to importance is the call of the posting admin, and is far . [[User:Kevin McE|Kevin McE]] ([[User talk:Kevin McE|talk]]) 20:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:* Yes, please post it before it goes stale. Some shockers of opposes here. [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) |
|||
::*Is this consensus? I see a lot of opposition based on valid reasoning. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::*Concur with Muhoshgu. The only reason to post being offered is that we posted the closing of the Olympics, which seems silly--the two events have incomparable notability. Aside from the British media (which is doing a fair bit of flag waving here), I've seen little if no coverage of the closing ceremony in Xinhua, Al Jazeera, [http://rbk.ru RBK.ru--a Russian site], [http://www.lequipe.fr/ L'equip], etc. Again, we posted the opening ceremony.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 17:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::*I'll grant that the quality of the posted article is much improved. But the Paralympics, for better or worse, have a fraction of the notability of the Olympics, and I don't see their closing ceremonies as meriting ITN. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::::*Simple vote count dudes. Is worth posting even if it is not notable "enough". The event marks the end of the "biggest sporting extravaganza of the disabled".<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 17:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::It's not a vote. There is very serious opposition to this above.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 18:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: What's not a vote a vote? Please explain? The articles in the ITN are based on editors votes, Right? Please discuss the opposition. If you believe that the arguments put forward in support of the article's candidacy are not worthwhile, then please elucidate your thoughts. We will strive to reach at a consensus through discussions.<span style="background:#F59801; padding:2px;"><font color="white">Regards, </font></span><span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px;">'''[[User:vaibhavgupta1989|<font color="white">theTigerKing</font>]] '''</span> 18:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::Please read [[Wikipedia:Consensus]]. Voting is not consensus. Explanations of why the Paralympic closing ceremony is not sufficiently notable have been posted above.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 18:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::: There is a clear majority to post, and some of the opposes were based on the article not having been expanded, which it is now. Consensus does not mean "something I agree with". [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) 19:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::All of the opposes have arguments other than the article expansion issue. 13-9 is hardly a clear consensus, and the support argments are 'we also posted the Olympics closing (invalid) and vague uncited references to global coverage.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 19:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::: I'm pretty sure that "I didn't see much of this on TV where I live" (which appears to be a good percentage of the opposes) isn't anything we should be concerned about. [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) 19:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::::That is a highly slanted interpretation of the oppose votes.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 19:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::::: You're joking. One of them even says "it didn't receive much coverage in the UK" which is simply a lie - it was the front page story in ''every single national newspaper'' today. It's still the top story on the BBC, as well as a number of other international agencies. [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) 19:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::::::Many other oppose votes validly cite that outside the UK the coverage is been much lower. I can't find much prominant mention above of the closing ceremony in non-British sources, and I cited several examples of such above. The British media is clearly doing a lot of flag waving on this.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 19:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{od}} |
|||
There is a huge amount of international coverage on this. I think you mean "American sources don't have a lot on this". [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) 20:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:Look at my post above on that matter. I have seen little evidence of huge interest in the closing ceremony. Please don't post what I mean; I'll do that myself. I've posted evidence from several international media backing up my opinion; you haven't. Another oppose !vote says '' global profile is many notches lower than that of the Olympics, and arguments based on equal rights or the notion that posting the opening ceremony demands posting the closing ceremony are validated by neither practice on ITN nor purpose of the template'', arguments I have yet to see refuted here. Several have pointed out that the opening ceremony was posted. Several people have questioned the 'global coverage' or interest in the closing ceremony--very little evidence has been given of such. I wouldn't deny the global interest in the paralympics as a whole. They were posted already at ITN. But posting about them again is normally done with sports events of extreme global notability. You can't deny that the Paralympics simply doesn't compare with the Summer Olympics in terms of global coverage or interest. And why in the world is this being made into a US issue?--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 20:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:: Apologies, I wasn't trying to put words into your mouth. However, three of the 9 "Opposes" are simply ''we posted the opening ceremony'', two are ''the article hasn't been updated'', and one is the comically untrue one I mentioned above ... given that, do you not think there is at least some consensus here? [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) 20:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:(ec) Well, I showed above that the games have been consistent front page news in all the main English-speaking countries except one. |
|||
:It shouldn't be posted simply to achieve parity with the Olympics, of course, but because it is a major event with a lot of coverage. I don't think anyone would argue that it's as big as the Olympics, but how do you think it compares, in terms of media attention, with the Chess Olympiad? [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 20:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::@Black Kite :::OK, Apologies myself. CIVIL should always rule. :) I guess one reason I"m a little stubborn here is because 'x-event was already posted' is an extremely common rationale to oppose at ITN. It is very rare that any event, be it a sports event or a otherwise, is posted when it was previously mentioned on ITN. Regarding the US coverage issue, I completely agree that the lack of US tv on the paralympics should not be a factor. Actually, the lack of US tv coverage has in fact itself generated some news (i.e. complaints) in the US. But it really seems to me that since the issue was debated a week ago about the sticky, that people are using the supposed lack of US interest as some sort of support, and are focusing only on coverage in the US and coverage in the UK. For what it's worth, I was living in Russia until a couple of months ago, and I monitor the news there. THere have been regular headlines of Russian wins, such as Russia winning gold in paralympic football. The TV coverage was limited to less than one hour per day during soap-opera time. The closing ceremony (which is what is being discussed here) got no coverage that I saw. I'm sure one could search for a headline but nothing was displayed prominently where I checked. One can check, with google translate, at rbk.ru or news.yandex.ru themselves. That's the evidence that I can cite.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 20:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::@ Formerip--you have done anything but prove that it's getting coverage in every country except one. This is what I meant above. It's like people are leveraging the claims that the US doens't care about the paralympics as support for this nomination (like saying 'your opposition tells me where you live') Perhaps you've demonstrated that it's big in the anglophone world outside the US. Also, coverage fo the closing ceremony itself (what was nominated) is very minimal from what I can see. Just one example [http://www.thestar.com/sports The Toronto Star sports page] doesn't mention it at all. This meme that the US doesn't care about the Paralymics is perhaps a worthy discussion for another (off-wiki) forum but focusing on the US doesn't make demonstrate this nomination's global importance. If anything your post above is just demonstrating a pro-anglophone systemic bias.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 20:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::''Perhaps you've demonstrated that it's big in the anglophone world outside the US''. That's exactly what I claimed to have demonstrated. What parallel universe have we just walked into where that's not enough? [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 21:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::::ok, I did misread your post. If the Paralympics hadn't already been posted, that would probably be enough. A second posting, IMHO and that of several posters above, should require a higher degree of interest. Plus, I've cited evidence above that the closing ceremony itself doesn't command the same interest.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 21:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Seriously? You're demanding more than the non-Us English-speaking world? For the English Wikipedia? What if I throw in a few of today's non-English papers? [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=GER_DT&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=DEN_POL&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=NET_TROUW&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=POR_PUBL&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=THA_TN&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=MEX_INF&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=COL_ESP&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=COL_ET&ref_pge=lst] [http://www.newseum.org/TODAYSFRONTPAGES/hr.asp?fpVname=AUT_DP&ref_pge=lst] [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 22:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== December 27 == |
|||
==September 7== |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/ |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 27]]}} |
||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 27}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==== |
==== RD: Ruth Butler ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Ruth Butler |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = Canada '''[[Canada-Iran relations|severs ties]]''' with Iran, closing its embassy in Tehran and expelling Iranian diplomats from Canada. |
|||
| sources = [ |
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/27/arts/ruth-butler-dead.html NYT] |
||
| |
| updated = yes |
||
| |
| creator = TJMSmith |
||
| |
| nominator = TJMSmith |
||
| |
| updaters = |
||
| nom cmt = American art historian and academic. Died November 28. Death reported on December 27. |
|||
| note = |
|||
| sign = [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] ([[User talk:TJMSmith|talk]]) 03:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = About a week ago, there was on the front page that Armenia had severed ties with Azerbaijan, I think it's a similar situation. |
|||
| sign = [[User:AmericanMarinee|AmericanMarinee]] ([[User talk:AmericanMarinee|talk]]) 18:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==== RD: Charles Shyer ==== |
|||
:'''<s>Oppose</s> Weak oppose''': <s>The update here is just a one line snippet that anyone could read in a newspaper; not worthy of Wikipedia. If it's fleshed out with background on the dispute and reasons for expulsion, I might change my opinion. You should at least try to update articles to ITN quality before nominating them.</s> The article has been updated better now, but given the already thoroughly strained relations, I can't help but wonder whether this little bit of political gerrymandering is actually significant. [[User:Kerfuffler|Kerfuffler]] ([[User talk:Kerfuffler|talk]]) 18:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
** I wouldn't go and state an outright oppose as well, if an update is done it would certainly have my support... --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 19:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| article = Charles Shyer |
|||
**"You should at least try to update articles to ITN quality before nominating them" is not true. One of the joys of being a volunteer. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<font color="#D60047">B</font><font color="#F0A000">zw</font><font color="#00A300">ee</font><font color="#0A47FF">bl</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 20:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
::: Lol I'll second that, nominating something could be the first step towards it being updated sufficiently. Kerfuffler, a simple "wait until updated" in the future is probably more ideal :P --[[User:Τασουλα|Τασουλα]] ([[User talk:Τασουλα|talk]]) 21:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| sources = [https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/dec/30/director-charles-shyer-dies-father-of-the-bride-baby-boom-parent-trap The Guardian] |
|||
:::: '''Support''' the post, but it's purely political. There was no crisis here, no trigger. No pardoned murderer or secret drone attack. It's just Canada being retarded. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 11:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
*'''Support''' - significant turn of events in international contentious affairs. I will expand the article to include more info, and update the lead in a few minutes. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 20:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| nominator = 31.44.227.152 |
|||
*'''Update''' I just expanded the update a bit. Will keep on it. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:10, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| updaters = Rusted AutoParts |
|||
*'''Support'''- When a country severs ties with another, it is usually notable, particularly when it is centered around a big issue like this. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<font color="#D60047">B</font><font color="#F0A000">zw</font><font color="#00A300">ee</font><font color="#0A47FF">bl</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 20:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = American film director, screenwriter, and producer. |
|||
*'''Question.''' Should/Can the reason(s) be included in the blurb? Just a thought. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA|talk]]) 20:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 22:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', this seems like a significant development, the article is updated, and it is in the news. I also validated ComputerJA's point: I think the blurb should include a short summation of Canada's rationale, as that seems highly relevent. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 20:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Support''', certainly notable. Another (and very serious) reaction to Iran.[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 20:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: Charlie Maxwell ==== |
|||
*'''Blurb''' - a few people requested that reasons be listed in the blurb. How about "Canada '''[[Canada-Iran relations|severs all diplomatic ties]]''' with Iran, citing safety concerns for diplomats, its nuclear program, human rights violations, foreign policy, and threats against Israel." I removed the whole part about closing the embassy, as that's seemingly obvious - closing diplomatic ties = closing the embassy. Thoughts? --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 20:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
**Looks fine for me [[User:AmericanMarinee|AmericanMarinee]] ([[User talk:AmericanMarinee|talk]]) 21:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| article = Charlie Maxwell |
|||
***Suggested blurb is fine, but lacking [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/07/canada-cuts-diplomatic-ties-iran the first cited reason], Iran's support for Syria. It should also be included.[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 21:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
*'''Support''': severance of diplomatic relationship between two major countries is highly notable. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 21:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| sources = [https://www.freep.com/story/sports/mlb/tigers/2024/12/28/charlie-maxwell-death-detroit-tigers-paw-paw/76830205007/ Detroit Free Press] |
|||
*'''Comment'''. "Severs ties" is too general. Canada undoubtedly still trades with Iran, still accepts Iranian students, remains willing to attend international conferences that Iran is invited to, and so on. [[User:FormerIP|Formerip]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 23:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
:Maybe something like Activism stated, where his blurb specifically notes that its the '''diplomatic''' ties that are severed. <span class="nowrap"><font color="red">Canuck</font><small><sup><font color="green">89</font> [[User talk:Canuckian89|(have words with me)]]</small></sup> <small>00:03, September 8, 2012 (UTC)</small></span> |
|||
| nominator = cbl62 |
|||
**Most media outlets used the term "sever ties" or "cut ties". Why should we change it? Thank you. [[User:AmericanMarinee|AmericanMarinee]] ([[User talk:AmericanMarinee|talk]]) 00:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| updaters = cbl62 |
|||
***We don't have to make the same mistakes they make. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| creator = |
|||
***Because we're using it as a statement of fact, and it's inaccurate. The title of a newspaper article shouldn't be enshrined; they are often carefully chosen to push a particular POV. [[User:Kerfuffler|Kerfuffler]] ([[User talk:Kerfuffler|talk]]) 00:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| nom cmt = American baseball outfielder (1947-1964), an All-Star in 1956 and 1957, known as "Sunday Charlie" and "The Sabbath Slugger" for his propensity to hit [[home run]]s on Sundays |
|||
*Posted. '''<font color="navy">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 02:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| sign = [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 23:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
**I'd do it myself, but I've commented so it would be better if someone uninvolved did it: Can we get some form of the revised blurb in there? The current blurb begs the question "why?" and there have been several people (myself included) who have indicated that an expanded blurb would be appropriate. Some combination of Activism's and Egeymi's suggestions above. --[[User:Jayron32|<font style="color:#000099">Jayron</font>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<font style="color:#009900">32</font>]]''''' 02:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
***Can you (or anyone else) suggest possible wording? I tried thinking of something to add on to the blurb, but nothing made sense or sounded clear. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T♦</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 07:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' well referenced and comprehensive. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 23:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
****A combined blurb with Egeymi's suggestion, which many editors seem to support, would be "Canada '''[[Canada-Iran relations|severs all diplomatic ties]]''' with Iran, citing safety concerns for diplomats, Iranian support for [[Bashar al-Assad]], the Iranian nuclear program, human rights violations, and threats against Israel." I think the current one is too vague, but isn't exactly an error so I'm posting this here rather than on the errors page. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><font color="teal">Activism</font></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<font color="darkred">1234</font>]]'''</small> 00:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
* Shall we wait till late Saturday to post this on the RD line so that he can appear on MainPage on Sunday (US time)? --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 15:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
**'''Funny Comment''' It is too funny to see that the breaking Canadian ties with Iran is far more important than '''[[16th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement]]''' in Tehran. I pray for you all. ;-) Could you at least make an article for it, would help to not be so funny. Best.--<font face="monospace">[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</font> 04:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*:Fine by me and yes, this does seem appropriate given his nickname. It will have fallen off this page by then, but that should not stop you from posting it at the desired time, {{u|PFHLai}}. I've certainly posted items before that had already been archived. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 18:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
'''Strong Oppose''': As I told above it is nothing but [[WP:BIAS]]. People support something which does not contain ''10 lines'' in the [[Canada–Iran relations|related article]].--<font face="monospace">[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</font> 10:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==== RD: Olivia Hussey ==== |
|||
*'''The blurb''' needs to be expaned. Maybe include "citing Iranian foreign policy and safety concerns for its diplomats" or something similar. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|And the horse]]</sup> 09:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
*'''Oppose''' I think, there is a many news which is neural and more important than this news.--[[User:Reality006|<font color="#0066CC">'''Reality'''</font>]] 14:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| article = Olivia Hussey<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
*'''Comment''': This seems a pretty weak story - two countries that seem to have always had pretty poor relations, that in recent years have got even worse, carry on in much the same vein. <span style="background:lightgrey;font-family:Courier;border:2px dashed #000;">[[User:JMiall|<font color="purple">JMiall</font>]][[User talk:JMiall|<font color="red">₰</font>]]</span> 23:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
**Not getting along is one thing, but severing ties is something else. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 01:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| sources = [https://variety.com/2024/film/news/olivia-hussey-dead-romeo-and-juliet-black-christmas-1236261093/ Variety]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
*Belated '''support''' as the severing of diplomatic ties is a big deal; I would support expanding the blurb to that nominated in the ITN template.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 03:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = 240F:7A:6253:1:C85F:CD98:861D:B7DF <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = British-Argentine actress.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/240F:7A:6253:1:C85F:CD98:861D:B7DF|240F:7A:6253:1:C85F:CD98:861D:B7DF]] ([[User talk:240F:7A:6253:1:C85F:CD98:861D:B7DF|talk]]) 03:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*<s>'''Weak support''', found two uncited claims, which I've added CN tags to. Article is fine otherwise.</s> '''Support''': CN issues now resolved. No more outstanding article issues from what I can see. [[Special:Contributions/31.44.227.152|31.44.227.152]] ([[User talk:31.44.227.152|talk]]) 11:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Article in good shape, cn issues appear to have been solved. [[User:Yakikaki|Yakikaki]] ([[User talk:Yakikaki|talk]]) 18:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' per nom. --[[User:IDB.S|IDB.S]] ([[User talk:IDB.S|talk]]) 00:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Filmography sourcing needs improvement.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 15:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Filmography needs ref work. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 08:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== (Posted) RD: Greg Gumbel ==== |
||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article |
| article = Greg Gumbel |
||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| blurb = Several '''[[2012 Yunnan earthquakes|earthquakes]]''' hit south-west [[People's Republic of China|China]] leaving at least 89 people dead and 800 injured. |
|||
| sources = [ |
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/27/business/media/greg-gumbel-dead.html NY Times] |
||
| |
| updated = yes |
||
| |
| nominator = Thriley |
||
| |
| updaters = TDKR Chicago 101, CAWylie |
||
| |
| creator = |
||
| nom cmt = American sportscaster who called N.F.L. and N.C.A.A. games for CBS. |
|||
| nom cmt = Sounds very important as series of earthquakes were reported with much damage, high death toll, and high level of media coverage worldwide. |
|||
| sign = |
| sign = [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 02:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
*'''Support'''. Widespread international coverage and high death toll. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA|talk]]) 15:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''<s>Strong oppose</s> Weak support''': <s>One line that anyone could read in a newspaper. Not what Wikipedia is for. [[User:Kerfuffler|Kerfuffler]] ([[User talk:Kerfuffler|talk]]) 15:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:BTW, see [[2012 Costa Rica earthquake]] for an example where I think the editors did a much better job of explaining the earthquake area, actual earthquake, and visible effects. That is what Wikipedia is about. If you update with this type of information, I would probably drop to “weak oppose”. [[User:Kerfuffler|Kerfuffler]] ([[User talk:Kerfuffler|talk]]) 18:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)</s> |
|||
:Thanks for improving the article. [[User:Kerfuffler|Kerfuffler]] ([[User talk:Kerfuffler|talk]]) 08:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' A fairly typical event and deathtoll for this part of the world. There have been similar quakes in China with death tolls far higher than this. We aren't a record of every quiver of our planet. [[User:Doktorbuk|doktorb]] <sub>[[User talk:Doktorbuk|words]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Doktorbuk|deeds]]</sup> 16:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Disagree. Earthquakes with dozens of fatalities are highly notable and (fortunately) don't happen that often. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 17:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - provided the article is sufficiently improved and expanded. The event is highly notable, but the article is bare-bones. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 17:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Strong support'''- The article isn't that bad and certainly meets the minimum requirements, and since this earthquake occurred in a world power like China, the importance is magnified that much more than places like Costa Rica. For instance, the [[2011 Virginia earthquake]] was posted, but that was very minor and killed notable; it was only notable because it occurred in a populous place in the U.S. In fact, [[Yunnan]] is home to even more people than the [[Northeast megalopolis]]. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<font color="#D60047">B</font><font color="#F0A000">zw</font><font color="#00A300">ee</font><font color="#0A47FF">bl</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 20:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**As of right now, the article has 302 characters of prose. If there are minimum requirements, I'd hope they'd necessitate the article at least be long enough for DYK. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 05:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
***Currently it has 1448 characters, that's 2 less than what DYK requires. <b>[[User:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#ff0000">Mohamed CJ</span>]]</b> [[User talk:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#07517C">(talk)</span>]] 11:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Per Kerfuffler, there just isn't enough content in this article. Maybe if it were properly expanded, I'd support, but in this state, I can't. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 05:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - In the past few hours the article has expanded (even yours truly lent a hand) and though still on the thin side, is acceptable for ITN. No doubt the article will be expanding further. [[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] 07:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - was significant before the article update. Being on the main page is a way to improve a news article anyway. Regards, [[User:Sun Creator|Sun Creator]]<sup>([[User talk:Sun Creator|talk]])</sup> 10:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. Significant event with strong impact; death toll is 89 now. 100,000 were forced to leave their homes which 20,000 of were damaged. <b>[[User:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#ff0000">Mohamed CJ</span>]]</b> [[User talk:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#07517C">(talk)</span>]] 11:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' 89 dead is actually pretty low. Zhaotong has a population of over 5 million. We know from the school collapses over there that construction isn't exactly world class. I oppose the number of deaths alone being a benchmark for inclusion, because we're not a death ticker. But even 100,000 people inconvenienced in a country of 1,200,000,000 isn't exactly a big deal. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 11:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:*If we go by percentage then 89 deaths in China would be equal to about 0.09 deaths in Bahrain (1.2M population) and by that logic we'd be posting almost every few deaths in that country (3-7 deaths would equal 3-7,000) while ignoring 100s of deaths in China and other populous countries. <b>[[User:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#ff0000">Mohamed CJ</span>]]</b> [[User talk:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#07517C">(talk)</span>]] 15:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::*Right, but we won't post almost every few deaths in Bahrain, so we shouldn't post just because of 89 deaths in china. Just like .09 deaths in Bahrain "isn't news", 89 in china "isn't news". Thanks for clearing that up :). PS: We're not a death ticker. --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 20:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''support''' when expanded--[[Special:Contributions/24.90.93.13|24.90.93.13]] ([[User talk:24.90.93.13|talk]]) 11:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' the update is just about there now, and with any luck posting will help the article develop further. —[[User talk:WaitingForConnection|WFC]]— 12:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Ready'''. Everything seems to be good with article size passing over DYK threshold. The last one-line section could be merged with another or expanded. <b>[[User:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#ff0000">Mohamed CJ</span>]]</b> [[User talk:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#07517C">(talk)</span>]] 15:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''', notable since covered internationally. <small>But, adressing the message above, what do you mean by DKY? It should be ITN or what?</small>[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 16:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:*<small>I was responding to Muboshgu oppose, who said he wanted article to be at least long enough for DYK. <b>[[User:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;color:#ff0000">Mohamed CJ</span>]]</b> [[User talk:Mohamed CJ|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#07517C">(talk)</span>]] 19:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::*<small>Thank you very much for explanation.[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 20:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)</small> |
|||
'''Posted'''. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 20:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' bus crash in China == post. bus crash in Iran == nope. Earthquake in China == post. Earth quake in Costa Rica == nope. Huh? --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 20:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
**3 people died in the Costa Rican earthquake. At least 89 died in this earthquake, with that number likely to grow. I think it's clear which is more significant. Location means nothing.-- <span style="background:#000000">'''[[User:Anc516|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Anc516</span>]]'''</span> ([[User talk:Anc516|Talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/Anc516|Contribs]]) 21:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
***3 people out of 4.1 million died in Costa Rica, 89 out of 1200 million died in China. Seems like 3 dead in Costa Rica is a natural disaster massacre compared to China... Of course, we're not a death ticker. I'm sorry for my confusion, what exactly is the minimum number of deaths? --[[User:IP98|IP98]] ([[User talk:IP98|talk]]) 00:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
****There is no hard minimum but single digits normally requires other notable circumstances.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 02:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-posting support''' on notability grounds. Pretty high death toll; as I said there's no hard figure on how many deaths make an event sufficiently notable but 89 is a lot. That said, I think the article is pretty sparse still. I don't think the article has ''three well formed paragraphs'' and that's a bare minimum.--[[User:Johnsemlak|Johnsemlak]] ([[User talk:Johnsemlak|talk]]) 03:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support''' First African-American sportscaster to call the Super Bowl. [[User:SigKauffman54|SigKauffman54]] ([[User talk:SigKauffman54|talk]]) 16:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====Save the Children expulsion from Pakistan==== |
|||
::That's not relevant here, only article quality is. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 16:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Oppose for now''' due to justified orange tag for lack of citations. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 16:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)</s> |
|||
**Fixed up, '''support'''. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 22:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Not Quite Ready''' A handful of CN tags and there is currently no mention of his death in the body.</s> -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 16:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::'''Support''' -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 21:39, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:*{{ping|Ad Orientem}} & {{ping|Muboshgu}} Article has been fixed up to shape. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 20:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Article is now in good shape. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 20:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 01:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) Kamal Adwan hospital burning==== |
|||
{{atop|Good faith nom, however consensus to post will not develop. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 03:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
{{ITN candidate |
||
| article = |
| article = Kamal Adwan Hospital sieges |
||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = CIA activity's connection with or resemblence to Save the Children gets the NGO expelled from Pakistan |
|||
| blurb = Israeli troops '''[[Kamal Adwan Hospital sieges|attack the Kamal Adwan hospital]]''', the last one remaining in the northern [[Gaza Strip]], forcing its staff and patients to leave |
|||
| sources = [http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/09/pakistan-evicts-save-the-children-foreign-workers.html LA Times][http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/sep/05/pakistan-voluntarysector Guardian]] |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| nominator = EdwardLane |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| updater = |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| updater2 = |
|||
| |
| altblurb = |
||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| note = |
|||
| sources = [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/27/israeli-soldiers-burn-gazas-kamal-adwan-hospital-force-hundreds-to-leave Al-Jazeera], [https://apnews.com/article/gaza-hospital-israel-troops-patients-fire-5bfab932afc29ce2205765ce1416a808 Associated Press] |
|||
| nom cmt = this seems pretty significant, not sure how to phrase the blurb with NPOV in mind. |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| sign = [[User:EdwardLane|EdwardLane]] ([[User talk:EdwardLane|talk]]) 10:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
| nominator = Vice regent <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| nom cmt = I know there's a daily tragedy in the Israel-Hamas war, but this is significant development given that its the last functioning one in northern Gaza Strip and hospitals have been a critical lifeline for Gazans. Further, burning down much of the hospital[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/hospital-gaza-siege-kamal-adwan-israel-evacuations-rcna185523] is fairly unprecedented even in this brutal war. Feel free to suggest alternative blurbs. |
|||
| sign = '''[[User talk:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>(Please [[Template:Ping|ping]] on reply)</sub> 20:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
''' |
*'''Oppose''' basically covered by ongoing; I don't see how this one specific event is that significant to bring out of that. Just more to add onto the pile of war crime charges that international courts have against Israel here. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 20:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' per Masem. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 22:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:try this for context: "Following the death of... and the arrest of ''whatshisface'', Pakistan expels expatriate employees of '''[[Save the Children]]'''" |
|||
:Note, only the ''expat'' employees are booted.[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 11:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::Hi Lihaas, just to double check... you mean foreign rather than expat, and to insert Osama bin Laden and Dr. Shakil Afridi? If so your suggested blurb becomes '''blurb''' "Following the death of [[Osama bin Laden]] and the arrest of Dr. [[Shakil Afridi]], [[Pakistan]] expels foreign employees of '''[[Save the Children]]'''" which seems reasonable, guess I should '''Support as nom''' [[User:EdwardLane|EdwardLane]] ([[User talk:EdwardLane|talk]]) 14:13, 8 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Oppose''' Covered by ongoing. --[[User:MtPenguinMonster|MtPenguinMonster]] ([[User talk:MtPenguinMonster|talk]]) 02:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==References== |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Already covered by ongoing, and is just one of many war crimes already done by Israel. By far the biggest one done. '''[[User:Setarip|<span style="color:deepskyblue; text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px black; font-family:Georgia, serif;">Setarip</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Setarip|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]]) 13:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the [[WP:External Links#How to link|inline URL syntax]] <nowiki>[http://example.com]</nowiki> rather than using [[WP:CITE#How to format inline citations|<nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tags]], because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section. |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Sad but not a major event of the war. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 19:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
====(Posted) Impeachment of Han Duck-soo==== |
|||
For the times when <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tags are being used, here are their contents: |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
| article = Impeachment of Han Duck-soo |
|||
| article2 = Han Duck-soo |
|||
| image = File:Prime Minister Han Duck-soo meets with Jeju Governor Oh Young-hun 20240516 (01) (cropped).jpg |
|||
| blurb = The [[President of South Korea|Acting President of South Korea]] and [[Prime minister of South Korea|Prime minister]], [[Han Duck-soo]] ''(pictured)'' is '''[[Impeachment of Han Duck-soo|impeached]]''' by the [[National Assembly (South Korea)|National Assembly]]. |
|||
| altblurb = [[President of South Korea|Acting President of South Korea]] and [[Prime minister of South Korea|Prime minister]], [[Han Duck-soo]] ''(pictured)'' is '''[[Impeachment of Han Duck-soo|impeached]]''' by the [[National Assembly (South Korea)|National Assembly]] and is succeeded by [[Choi Sang-mok]]. |
|||
| recent deaths = no |
|||
| ongoing = no |
|||
| ITNR = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj30234e0djo BBC News], [https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-korea-parliament-majority-votes-impeach-acting-president-han-2024-12-27/ Reuters], [https://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/billDetail.do?billId=PRC_Z2H4B1H2X2P6Z1P3Y5D7D2M8V9Q3B5 South Korea National Assembly E-law Library] [https://www.kwnews.co.kr/page/view/2024122715252138062 KWNews (in Korean)] |
|||
| updated = |
|||
| nominator = Haers6120 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = Queen of Hearts |
|||
| updaters = Borgenland |
|||
| nom cmt = Impeachement of Acting President of South Korea is unprecedented, and deputy prime minister will be both acting President and acting Prime Minister will also unprecedented. I also feel that we may need an ongoing article title like "2024-2025 South Korea Political Crisis" |
|||
| sign = [[User:Haers6120|Haers6120]] ([[User talk:Haers6120|talk]]) 06:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
:UPDATE: Han seems accept National Assembly's decision [https://n.news.naver.com/article/050/0000084327]. [[User:Haers6120|Haers6120]] ([[User talk:Haers6120|talk]]) 08:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 08:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose on quality''' the direct cause [[2024 South Korean martial law crisis]] and the subsequent protests are buried deep in the article rather than in the lede and the article goes at length about procedural matters which is great but it's missing all the other context. Furthermore the martial law and protest articles should really be in the blurb. An event infobox would be nice too. [[User:Abcmaxx|Abcmaxx]] ([[User talk:Abcmaxx|talk]]) 08:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:we could nominate a seperate ongoing article if needed. [[User:Haers6120|Haers6120]] ([[User talk:Haers6120|talk]]) 08:09, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I disagree that your concerns are enough to oppose on quality, but I will try to work on this. Already added an infobox. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 08:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' --[[User:Takipoint123|Takipoint123]] ([[User talk:Takipoint123|talk]]) 08:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{NOINDEX}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''' SK's government seems to be gridlocked and this impeachment just seems to be a procedural tactic which passed easily because only a simple majority was required as this was considered a ministerial-level matter. It reminds me of the difficulty in getting a stable Speaker of the US House. It's internal politics and there's more to come before they are out of the woods. Other countries such as France and Germany have similar issues and so we should have a fairly high bar for posting. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' significant news from the crisis [[User:Setarip|Setarip]] ([[User talk:Setarip|talk]]) 11:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Change of head of state and effective executive of the nation. And isn't this ITNR? [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 11:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::I don't ''think'' it's ITNR, because Han was explicitly only the acting president, and is in his turn only suspended and not deposed. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 13:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well the nom is listed as such and I don't think our ITNR rules for heads of state/government (state leaders) have ever been that granular to exclude such changes [of acting versus normally elected/appointed]. |
|||
:::Also, I think we need to appreciate the difference between those countries where single state leaders hold effective power (South Korea) versus where where power distribution maybe more shared (France, Germany that have been cited here). [[User:Gotitbro|Gotitbro]] ([[User talk:Gotitbro|talk]]) 15:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak oppose''' - Clearly the first impeachment following the attempt to declare martial law was major. Following that impeachment and resignation, the role of acting president fell to the PM, which was not meant to be a long-term determination. This impeaching is a result of more political infighting, and nothing specifically that Duck-soo did, and far less impactful than the original impeachment. Its basically a game of partisan musical chairs, since now the finance minister becomes next in line as acting president. --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 13:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support altblurb''' Notable event. Han is the first acting president is the country's history to be impeached. This is a significant update from the fallout of the martial law crisis. Also, the altblurb is best as it illustrates the change in power so to speak. Article is in good shape too. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 13:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak oppose''' - While this is significant, it's part of the continuing crisis. As Andrew notes correctly, France and Germany are also both experiencing unstable government at the moment, and we're not posting blow-by-blow accounts of those to ITN, but only the substantive changes at the top. South Korea's situation, while a bit more volatile, is broadly similar. [[User:GenevieveDEon|GenevieveDEon]] ([[User talk:GenevieveDEon|talk]]) 13:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:*France and Germany are bad analogies in this case, not least because South Korea's case already involves an attempted self-coup and two impeachments. Though I ultimately agree that a third blurb about largely the same crisis might be too much, there may be merit in instead adding this to Ongoing (if it can be maintained). [[User:Yo.dazo|Yo.dazo]] ([[User talk:Yo.dazo|talk]]) 16:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Another successful impeachment? Really? Unprecedented event in the South Korea's history. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 16:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Support''' This is another major and unprecedented development in a situation that has already proven itself to be blurb-worthy on at least 2 occasions [[User:Rahcmander|Rahcmander]] ([[User talk:Rahcmander|talk]]) 16:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: '''Support''' For this is unprecedented situation and technically change of head of state. Would oppose another impeachment (which is probable in less than a week) as per Andrew. [[User:Didgogns|Didgogns]] ([[User talk:Didgogns|talk]]) 18:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per above. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 18:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Nobody saw this coming [[User:Orbitalbuzzsaw|This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang]] ([[User talk:Orbitalbuzzsaw|talk]]) |
|||
*'''Comment''' This is an extension of the initial coup. The root cause for both, is that for some reason I can't fathom, having a solid majority in the Parliament, doesn't give you any control of the government. Similar to the issues in the USA, but without the ability of the Parliament to pass legislation, or change the speaker. For some reason the party controlling the presidency and PM believe that letting the other party into power is some existential crisis - hence the extremes they'll go to (first illegally, and now legally). This will continue until a presidential election is triggered. I have no doubt the new acting President will be impeached quickly if he doesn't approve the nominations to the constitutional court. Perhaps South Korean Constitutional Crisis or something should be an ongoing? [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 03:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Is there news coverage of the events of this happening near daily? Not really. Just because two events have happened within a month apart doesn't make it an ongoing story, and the ongoing line is far too busy as it is right now to add anything else, particularly something that isn't having near-daily stories. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 04:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I've seen news reports several times a week since the coup, between the coup, and three impeachment votes. [[User:Nfitz|Nfitz]] ([[User talk:Nfitz|talk]]) 20:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Weak Support:''' This is just a greater part of the coup attempt by Yoon, but something I didn't see coming. [[User:TansoShoshen|TansoShoshen]] ([[User talk:TansoShoshen|talk]]) 10:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{@ITNA}} I see consensus to post here. (I am of course far too involved to do it myself.) [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 20:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::I agree that there's consensus. May I suggest that we wait half a day or so? I've just posted the [[Juscelino Kubitschek de Oliveira Bridge collapse]] and it sits in the bottom slot. If we were to post this item now, it'll nuke the bridge article after only a few minutes. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:var(--color-base, #202122);">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 20:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Fine with me. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 20:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ah I didn't see this conversation before posting the Jeju crash up. The bridge collapse wasn't removed as today's Featured Article slot is just a tad longer. I am uncertain if we want to post up Han's image as it will be adjacent to the plane crash blurb. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 04:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''', lost the probe and kept the bridge collapse for a bit longer. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 04:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== December 26 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2024 December 26]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2024 December 26}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
---- |
|||
==== (Reviewers needed) RD: Richard Parsons (businessman) ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Richard Parsons (businessman)<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2024-12-26/richard-parsons-who-steadied-time-warner-and-the-l-a-clippers-dies-at-76 LA Times]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = 240F:7A:6253:1:C8D7:448A:7EA0:D6EA <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updaters = <!-- Editor(s) who significantly updated the article, separated by commas --> |
|||
| nom cmt = American business executive and former CEO of Time Warner.<!-- Additional comments go here --> |
|||
| sign = [[Special:Contributions/240F:7A:6253:1:C8D7:448A:7EA0:D6EA|240F:7A:6253:1:C8D7:448A:7EA0:D6EA]] ([[User talk:240F:7A:6253:1:C8D7:448A:7EA0:D6EA|talk]]) 06:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
==== RD: John B. Cobb ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = John B. Cobb |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://cst.edu/news/cst-mourns-the-passing-of-john-cobb/ Claremont School of Theology] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = Thriley |
|||
| updaters = TDKR Chicago 101, Mrlojo |
|||
| creator = |
|||
| nom cmt = American theologian, philosopher and environmentalist. Death announced 27 December. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 01:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Support''' Well. --[[User:ExclusiveEditor|<span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF7043,#FFCC80);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-left-radius:6px;border-bottom-left-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;">Exclusive</span><span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#263238,#37474F);color:#fff;padding:4px 8px;border-top-right-radius:6px;border-bottom-right-radius:6px;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;box-shadow:0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,.2);text-transform:uppercase;margin-left:-1px;">Editor</span>]] [[User talk:ExclusiveEditor|<sub style="font-size:11px;color:#757575;font-style:italic;letter-spacing:.5px;">🔔 Ping Me!</sub>]] 09:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Quite a few paragraphs that don’t end with a reference. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 09:25, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted blurb) RD/Blurb: Manmohan Singh ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Manmohan Singh |
|||
| image = Official Portrait of the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh.jpg |
|||
| blurb = Former [[Prime Minister of India]] '''[[Manmohan Singh]]''' ''(pictured)'' dies at the age of 92 |
|||
| recent deaths = yes <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| ITNR = no |
|||
| altblurb = |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.reuters.com/world/india/indias-former-pm-manmohan-singh-dies-aged-92-2024-12-26/ Reuters], [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/manmohan-singh-passes-away-at-92-former-prime-minister-congress-leader/articleshow/116689736.cms The Times of India] |
|||
| updated = yes |
|||
| nominator = Sportsnut24 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = <!-- Editor who created the article, if relevant --> |
|||
| updaters = TDKR Chicago 101, Fylindfotberserk |
|||
| nom cmt = Potential blurb, but he's not sitting, so at least RD. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Sportsnut24|Sportsnut24]] ([[User talk:Sportsnut24|talk]]) 16:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)<!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Support Blurb''' He was one of the most influential individual of the modern Indian history and was the prime minister of India for a decade. The Degrees and posts held section needs some work but otherwise article is in good shape. [[User:PrinceofPunjab|'''<span style="color:#BC13FE">ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ</span>''']]<sup> [[User talk:PrinceofPunjab|'''<span style="color:#1F51FF">(PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ)</span>''']]</sup> 17:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' Important and influential figure in modern India - he served 2 terms as [[Prime Minister of India|PM]] and he was an important figure in [[Economic liberalisation in India|liberating]] India's economy [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 17:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Weak oppose on quality''' Article has some cn tags and there's a refimprove section tag at the end of the article. Once these issues are addressed, I would</s> '''strongly support blurb''' seeing how Singh was a highly influential prime minister of India and a dominant figure in modern Indian politics. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 17:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*General '''Support blurb''' as this is basically there in quality (I see a few noncritical tags but sourcing is basically there) and with the Public Image section, clearly outlines his status as a major figure on Indian politics. [[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 17:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' One of few individuals who significantly shaped world history. As Finance Minister, brought accelerated economic growth to India that continues to this day and has helped raise standard of living for over a billion people and transformed global geopolitics. As Prime Minister, reduced rural poverty, brought India into global nuclear order, averted war in the aftermath of major terrorist attacks, and many other accomplishments. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<span style="color:#D60047">B</span><span style="color:#F0A000">zw</span><span style="color:#00A300">ee</span><span style="color:#0A47FF">bl</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 17:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' once outstanding CN tags are fixed. ''[[User:UndercoverClassicist|<b style="color:#7F007F">UndercoverClassicist</b>]]'' <sup>[[User talk:UndercoverClassicist|T]]·[[Special:Contributions/UndercoverClassicist|C]]</sup> 17:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Issues fixed {{ping|UndercoverClassicist}} [[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 17:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' Long-serving, influential leader of a major nation. [[User:The Kip|<span style="color:#333f42;">'''The'''</span>]] [[User talk:The Kip|<span style="color:#b4975a;">'''Kip'''</span>]] <span style="color:#C8102E;"><small><sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Kip|contribs]])</sup></small></span> 18:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' Unanimous support for blurb. [[User:Grimes2|Grimes2]] ([[User talk:Grimes2|talk]]) 19:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support blurb''' as per others above. [[User:Abhishikt|-Abhishikt]] ([[User talk:Abhishikt|talk]]) 19:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Posted''' blurb. [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkgreen;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup>👸🎄</sup>]] 19:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:[[Death and state funeral of Manmohan Singh]] was created. [[User:ArionStar|ArionStar]] ([[User talk:ArionStar|talk]]) 12:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==References== |
|||
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the [[WP:External Links#How to link|inline URL syntax]] <code><nowiki>[http://example.com]</nowiki></code> rather than using [[WP:CITE#How to format inline citations|<code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code> tags]], because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process. |
|||
For the times when <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code> tags are being used, here are their contents: |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia In the news]] |
|||
{{Reflist}}{{NOINDEX}} |
|||
<noinclude>{{Main Page topics|state=collapsed}} |
|||
[[Category:Wikipedia In the news|Candidates]] |
|||
[[Category:Main Page discussions]] |
|||
[[Category:Current events]] |
Latest revision as of 08:39, 2 January 2025
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary[edit]
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps[edit]
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers[edit]
Voicing an opinion on an item[edit]Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...[edit]
Please do not...[edit]
Suggesting updates[edit]There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
[edit]Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives
Sections
[edit]This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.
January 2
[edit]
January 2, 2025
(Thursday)
|
RD: Ágnes Keleti
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1] blikk portfolio hvg
Credits:
- Nominated by 94.44.118.57, Ugri ugri idő (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: The oldest living Olympian in history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.44.118.57 (talk) 07:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
January 1
[edit]
January 1, 2025
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Business and economy
International relations
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
2025 Trump International Hotel explosion
[edit]Blurb: One person is killed and seven others are injured when a Tesla Cybertruck explodes (pictured) outside of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas in Paradise, Nevada, United States. (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times BBC ABC News
Credits:
- Nominated by Spworld2 (talk · give credit)
Spworld2 (talk) 09:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose This was deliberated before but it was taken down. Now a few hours on, we have more coverage than smoke being reported by The Mirror, but it still doesn't appear that important. Also, the article is at AfD, but that appears to be SNOW keep at the moment. Departure– (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– This is in favor of the AfD discussion, but the article should maintain its current status.
- This does not appear to be a normal explosion, there is international media coverage[1][2][3][4], one person was killed and 7 were injured, and there are reports that this is related to the 2025 New Orleans truck attack Spworld2 (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Whether it was intentional or not, a single death is not significant to post as a story, unless it was determined to be an act of terrorism (which doesn't seem to be the case at this point). --Masem (t) 05:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Masem Was it determined to be intentional or not? There was one death and more than 7 injuries, and this did not happen near a normal hotel. 2025 New Orleans truck attack still under investigation -
- FBI is trying to determine if the incident was an act of terrorism, CNN [5] reports Spworld2 (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting MINIMUMDEATHS > 1? Banedon (talk) 08:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - this nomination has already been closed once. This could easily be just an accident or a grandiose suicide. The only reason there may be more coverage than local is because of the (possibly conincidental) timing with the New Orleans attack; which would make it the same story if there is a link. Nfitz (talk) 05:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfit It seems that the previous nomination was terminated due to lack of quality. This does not seem to be a normal occurrence. Spworld2 (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Schengen Area expansion
[edit]Blurb: Romania and Bulgaria join the Schengen Area, the European passport-free zone. (Post)
News source(s): CNN, Reuters
UCinternational (talk) 04:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support, I would argue that any changes to the composition of the Schengen Area are inherently relevant as the largest area with free movement in the world, and for years it has been a major topic of discussion here in the European Union that Romania and Bulgaria were the last EU members to not have been admitted (excl. Ireland who have an opt-out) because of a veto from Austria in the Council of the European Union. So it was very significant when the vote finally passed last month in the Justice and Home Affairs Council.
- However, that wording is probably not ideal—in a legal sense, Romania and Bulgaria joined the Schengen Area on 31 March 2024 when border controls were lifted for air and sea travel. The news are that land border checks have also just been lifted, granting the countries full participation on the same level as all other 27 member states.
- So I would propose re-phrasing the blurb to something like Romania and Bulgaria become full members of the Schengen Area, with land border checks lifted on 1 January 2025.
- BochiBochiGalaxy (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: John B. O'Reilly Jr.
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6]
Credits:
- Nominated by History6042 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Moeqas (talk · give credit) and Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: 6th mayor of Dearborn, Michigan. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Chad Morgan
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-01-02/chad-morgan-australian-country-music-singer-dies/104778248
Credits:
- Nominated by HiLo48 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Australian comedy country music performer known as "The Sheik of Scrubby Creek". HiLo48 (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
2025 Cetinje shootings
[edit]Blurb: Thirteen people including the perpetrator are killed and four others are injured in spree shootings in Cetinje, Montenegro. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Thirteen are killed in spree shootings in Cetinje, Montenegro. The shootings are the deadliest in Montenegro since 1944 during Nazi occupation.
News source(s): [7]
Credits:
- Nominated by SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk · give credit)
- Support on notability, oppose on quality Quite similar in scope as the 2022 Cetinje shooting, also taking place in Cetinje. Removed mention of terrorism in the blurb as it's not in the source beyond the involvement of counter-terrorist government agencies. The second shooting targeted the restaurant owner's family. Departure– (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– Changed it once more to deadliest shooting in Montenegro since 1944. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's almost certainly not relevant. "Deadliest since X" isn't needed in a blurb. Departure– (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– Please clarify if I am wrong but doesn't blurb mean short description? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Blurbs are almost always a single sentence and typically don't contain context in the blurb. For instance, we wouldn't have the second sentence read "Shootings in Montenegro are rare due to strict gun laws" either - that can be implied from the source or the article. Departure– (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I turned SSCG's changes into an altblurb. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Departure– Please clarify if I am wrong but doesn't blurb mean short description? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's almost certainly not relevant. "Deadliest since X" isn't needed in a blurb. Departure– (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality. Article is all of eight sentences. Notability is unclear. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem how is a terrorist attack that has killed as many people as the New Orleans truck attack not notable? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The article does not indicate that this is a terrorist incident. If that is established I would likely support on the merits, though article quality does not meet the customary standards for ITN as of this comment. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem its still people dying... SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I am not questioning the basic notability of the subject for inclusion in the encyclopedia. But we have a higher bar for blurbs at ITN. All of which said, the immediate problem is article quality. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem its still people dying... SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The article does not indicate that this is a terrorist incident. If that is established I would likely support on the merits, though article quality does not meet the customary standards for ITN as of this comment. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem how is a terrorist attack that has killed as many people as the New Orleans truck attack not notable? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability, oppose on quality. This is the worst shooting in the country since World War II, so it definitely warrants inclusion. However, the article is way too short for the main page. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: I oppose the altblurb, since those facts may not be correct. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - there's no mention in the article about these being the largest shootings since WWII. Perhaps because 11 died in the same location less than 30 months ago - 2022 Cetinje shooting (which was ITN). Also there were higher death counts for sprees murdering Albanians during the 1990s Yugoslav wars. This nomination is WP:OR. Nfitz (talk)
- Oppose per Nfitz. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 23:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support original blurb on notability, wait on quality. This is definitely notable with 10 dead, but the article is a very short stub. I also oppose the alternative blurb per Nfitz. --SpectralIon (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - This doesn't seem terrorism related at all, and is rather a crazy person with a gun angry at the world after perceived slights. --RockstoneSend me a message! 00:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon he killed as many people as the new orleans truck attack, what makes this not in the news? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I supported this for ITN, did you mean to ping Rockstone? SpectralIon (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon Yes, I am sorry. @Rockstone35 read above please SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @User:SimpleSubCubicGraph we typically don't post things that are notable only for the number of deaths without something more. We wouldn't have posted a mass shooting that killed 10 people in the US, for example. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 03:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rockstone35 so 10 people dying mean nothing to you? What if you were a family member of those people? Wouldnt you want everyone to hear what that person did? You cant be apathetic to these people just because they dont affect you. You need to understand how that not only affected the family and friends of the 10 but the entire city and nation of Montenegro. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 04:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @User:SimpleSubCubicGraph we typically don't post things that are notable only for the number of deaths without something more. We wouldn't have posted a mass shooting that killed 10 people in the US, for example. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 03:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon Yes, I am sorry. @Rockstone35 read above please SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I supported this for ITN, did you mean to ping Rockstone? SpectralIon (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SpectralIon he killed as many people as the new orleans truck attack, what makes this not in the news? SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Ad Orientem and Nfitz. Beyond deaths, special notability seems shaky. The Kip (contribs) 03:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support on notability, oppose on quality. Wait until the article is not a stub to post it. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted) 2025 New Orleans truck attack
[edit]Blurb: 11 people are killed and 36 others are injured in a vehicle-ramming and shooting attack in New Orleans, Louisiana (street pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: Eleven people are killed and thirty-six others are injured in a vehicle-ramming and shooting attack in New Orleans, Louisiana (intersection pictured).
News source(s): [8][9][10]
Credits:
- Nominated by Personisinsterest (talk · give credit)
Wait on quality,support on notability. Going through some international news websites, this is the very top story on most of them and one of the top on all of them.I think a bit more information is needed in the article, but it's a matter of time as new information comes in.Heythereimaguy (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)- I, along with other users, have edited the article as more information has surfaced to the point where I believe that the article is of high enough quality. Support. Heythereimaguy (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment We typically do not post shootings in the US due to their frequency, but I will note that the fact that they found improvised explosives in the truck and the suspect was wearing armored gear suggests this is more than a run of the mill shooting, very likely premeditated. Should at least wait until some more info on the motive (if they can figure it out, the driver was killed) --Masem (t) 14:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, this was more a vehicle attack than a shooting. Heythereimaguy (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- The article is called "car attack" (actually now "truck attack"), so it is puzzling why one would ignore that central aspect when assessing the article's notability. Einsof (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wait on quality and support without image for notability, however, the current image of just the street is, in my opinion, irrelevant. We don't need an image for every blurb. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Use Terrorist attack instead of 'Car attack' if confirmed. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support quality is ok now. ArionStar (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support: This is the worst terrorist attack on American soil in years. BOTTO (T•C) 15:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Personisinsterest: Would you be able to change the link in your nomination to 2025 New Orleans truck attack? The article has been renamed since you nominated it. BOTTO (T•C) 17:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Got it! Personisinsterest (talk) 18:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Personisinsterest: Would you be able to change the link in your nomination to 2025 New Orleans truck attack? The article has been renamed since you nominated it. BOTTO (T•C) 17:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Its the new year and a terrorist attack happened. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Quality is fine given the amount of publicly available information. Notable based on high number of casualties for a vehicle-ramming attack. Einsof (talk) 17:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Similar to the 2024 Magdeburg car attack that was posted at couple weeks earlier. Even more dead though and with an ISIS flag, bombs and guns, this is not run-of-the-mill in any way. Quality is good considering the amount of info available at the moment. --TorsodogTalk 17:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 18:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2025 Trump Tower fire
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: A cybertruck catches on fire near the Trump Tower with casulaties still unknown. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-trump-tower-explosion-horror-34403879]
Credits:
- Nominated by SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk · give credit)
- Oppose and topic ban User:SimpleSubCubicGraph from ITN. A car fire? And the sole source in the nomination is from a somewhat questionable tabloid list as WP:MREL. Nfitz (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose WP:NTRUMP - no casualties confirmed or reported yet, damage unclear but doesn't appear much, reporting is coming from inside the tower implying most inside are more or less safe but they're saying that the fire wasn't even at the tower. The "big story" is literal reporting on smoke via The Mirror. Departure– (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wow Great to see some serious sources wading in: GB News, Daily Star, and Wiki's Favourite. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Nfitz I assumed it was a terrorist attack given that another one happened in New Orleans just a few hours ago. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
December 31
[edit]
December 31, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Jocelyn Wildenstein
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): People
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Swiss socialite best known for her extensive cosmetic surgery. 240F:7A:6253:1:58D9:DCBF:4F69:EC26 (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Arnold Rüütel
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [11]
Credits:
- Nominated by 2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: 3rd President of Estonia from 2001–2006. 2A00:807:C7:C82A:2859:B355:BAAD:86AD (talk) 04:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not Ready Multiple CN tags --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Several instances in the article of sourcing issues which need to be fixed. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 14:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Angelo Amato
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [12]
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by History6042 (talk · give credit)
- Created by LCahill (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Italian cardinal who died yesterday. History6042😊 (Contact me) 04:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Almost there One CN tag. But it's an entire list of his publications. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Added ISBNs Grimes2 (talk) 04:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Johnnie Walker
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Ollieisanerd (talk · give credit)
- Created by R. fiend (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Cameron Scott (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: English disc jockey. Ollieisanerd (talk • contribs) 16:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support He seems to be quite popular as a DJ, including winning many awards. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Curbon7 (talk) 12:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: currently 18 {cn} tags. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready per Martinevans123. Referencing is not up to scratch. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
(Closed) 2024 United States Treasury Hack
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The Chinese Communist Party hacks into the United States Treasury, stealing valuable data (Post)
Alternative blurb: The United States Department of the Treasury states that it was hacked by a Chinese intelligence agency.
News source(s): (Reuters)
Credits:
- Nominated by SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk · give credit)
- Oppose First, that blurb is extremely misleading on two angles: Chinese hackers are suspected, but there's not yet any connection to the CCP. Second, the data took was "unclassified documents", which means it is unlikely to be "valuable" data from the Treasure department. As such, this is nowhere close to a major scandle, they just had to report it after reporting it to Congress. At this point, its not a significant incident. --Masem (t) 01:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Masem To your first point, yes that is true, a "suspicion" but 99% likely CCP hackers. Secondly, unclassified does not mean publicly available data, there are unclassified documents in the military, but that does not mean you can go around looking at it. Also the extent of the hack is still unreported. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 01:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nonetheless I will still leave it up to garner a community census. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 01:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Which is why at this point, how significant this is is unknown, particularly compared to the phone network hacks earlier this previous month. As this happened earlier this month and only being reported on now, we should wait until we see if there's a serious diplomatic issue that develops. Masem (t) 01:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Oh no, my data! Seriously though, per above this isn't a major or important development yet. Much larger cyberattacks have happened since, such as National Public Data where actual valuable information was confirmed to be leaked, and that wasn't posted because we couldn't muster enough editors to get that up to quality. Tell me, what was stolen exactly? I'll reconsider if this gets more coverage. I'd give weak support on quality here. Departure– (talk) 04:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Departure– you know the Treasury will not leak what was stolen, but it was likely the programs that monitor and communicate with funding. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the blurb, it is laughably breaking many WPian notions. Nothing to say on posting another blurb. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 08:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not WP:BITE. Gotitbro (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it in a devious way, but that in the process of forming a blurb, it produced something which is a bit humorous, as well as not fit few Wiki guidelines. I hope SimpleSubCubicGraph didn't get it the wrong way. It is a good faith nom anyway. --ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 11:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor I'm sorry, I won't make a new post anymore if thats what you want SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @SimpleSubCubicGraph You got me, I meant you to not post anything ever again, stop editing and take a pretty much sanyasa from this wiki world of illusions.[FBDB] --ExclusiveEditor(talk) 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor I can not tell if that is humor or not, and yes I am being serious. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 22:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @SimpleSubCubicGraph You got me, I meant you to not post anything ever again, stop editing and take a pretty much sanyasa from this wiki world of illusions.[FBDB] --ExclusiveEditor(talk) 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not WP:BITE. Gotitbro (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just the latest in Chinese intelligence activity abroad (Chinese espionage in the United States, Chinese espionage in California) and Chinese information operations and information warfare. 2024 United States telecommunications hack was another one of these along with the Chinese interference in the 2024 United States elections; this isn't as unique of a story as it would initially seem. If things escalate we can re-consider. Gotitbro (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Masem. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Insignificant Setarip (talk) 16:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Masem. -- KTC (talk) 23:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose and WP:WHACK! User:SimpleSubCubicGraph for a horrid nomination. Nfitz (talk) 23:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per everybody. --SpectralIon (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per further thought. After rethinking about the grand scope of the article, I have changed my opinion on the matter and no longer think it is newsworthy enough to end up on the front page. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 5:04:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
December 30
[edit]
December 30, 2024
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
RD: Michael Newberry
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RTE, BBC
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by The C of E (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: English-born Northern Irish footballer The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 10:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Quality looks good to me. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Jamshid bin Abdullah
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Atheer.om
Credits:
- Nominated by Mr. Lechkar (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Last sultan of Zanzibar, claimant to the defunct throne since the monarchy was overthrown in 1964. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 10:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article looks good, though it's also pretty short. Yo.dazo (talk) 14:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- There's nothing on his early life and I conclude that it’s not fit for posting in its current state. Schwede66 16:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose He is insignificant. Although he may be the heir, that is about the peak of his fame. Zanzibar is apart of Tanzania now and even then was a state that nobody cared about, both strategically and relevance. This would not be good for In the news but rather Did you know and even then, its very hard if that should appear on that page. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- FYI, for RD we normally only oppose due to the quality of the article. If it has an article, the subject is notable enough to appear in RD. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Schwede66. Article needs a lot more info such as about early life, which could be expanded a bit. Plus, there's some cn tags. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 01:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Linda Lavin
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): (ABC)
Credits:
- Nominated by QalasQalas (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: great loss actress and she deserves
- Comment: Article looks fine except the whole filmography is unsourced. RachelTensions (talk) 01:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Ethiopian Truck Crash
[edit]Blurb: Ethiopian truck crash kills 71 people. (Post)
Alternative blurb: 71 people die in an Ethiopian truck crash
Alternative blurb II: A truck falls off a bridge over the Ganale Doria River in Bona Zuria, Sidama Region, Ethiopia, killing 71 people and injuring 4 others.
News source(s): [13]
Credits:
- Nominated by Alexgmail2000 (talk · give credit)
- Oppose Article is a stub. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 12:14, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is no longer a stub, I believe. Ca talk to me! 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I still believe it is a stub / article needs expansion. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Someone with local sources to help us? ArionStar (talk) 17:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I still believe it is a stub / article needs expansion. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is no longer a stub, I believe. Ca talk to me! 14:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article is decent and significant as the Minas Gerais road crash. The year 2024 is ending very badly. ArionStar (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is "disaster" the right word for the article name? the sources seem to leave it as "accident" even with a toll that high? --Masem (t) 13:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Like Madan Ashrit Highway disaster and Westdene dam disaster. ArionStar (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- The move from truck crash to this new title was not discussed and should be reverted. "Try to avoid the words disaster, tragedy and crisis because this characterization is too subjective. It is preferable to use specific event names, such as collision, collapse, explosion, outbreak, pandemic, sinking, oil spill, and the like."
- Also Oppose on quality and sourcing.
- Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I moved the article. Ca talk to me! 16:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The article significant because of many sources reported it numerous times. AsteriodX (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notabilty, Wait on quality, hopefully the article will improve eventually. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 17:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support What is it with disasters this week? Setarip (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Setarip what is with the entire year, so many incidents happening. its crazy, espically the latter half SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh and Support SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Setarip what is with the entire year, so many incidents happening. its crazy, espically the latter half SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on article quality WP:STUB QalasQalas (talk) 20:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for article quality then support altblurb2 without picture as the current image is too low quality. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 22:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose bus plunge This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 22:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Truck" plunge. ArionStar (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is actually a very good point about how news media, now with 24/7 operations, needs news to cover, and why as an encyclopedia we should be wary of giving attention to every single accident that gets reported. — Masem (t) 01:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait until article quality improves, then Support Altblurb 2 due to the high number of casualties. P.S. is going into edit source the correct way to reply to an ITN nom? This is my first time and I couldn't find info about it. --SpectralIon (talk) 00:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability once the article is no longer a stub. high number of casualties, significant coverage. FlipandFlopped ツ 01:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Article is a stub and we don’t post those. Schwede66 16:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Little encyclopedic value to our readers. Tradediatalk 23:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm trying to do something but no updates yet. ArionStar (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- support just posted N'orleans with a dozen dead. Only logical.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- We can make an exception here. It's so tragical. ArionStar (talk) 02:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
December 29
[edit]
December 29, 2024
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
|
2024 Estlink 2 incident
[edit]Note that I've moved the item to 29 Dec, the date of the ship's transfer to Porvoo (see ALT2), as otherwise, this would be stale by now. Schwede66 18:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Blurb: The submarine power cable Estlink 2 is damaged by an oil tanker suspected of belonging to Russia. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Finnish police take over oil tanker Eagle S, suspected of damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2.
Alternative blurb II: Eagle S, suspected of damaging submarine power cable Estlink 2, is transferred to Porvoo for investigation.
News source(s): https://yle.fi/a/74-20133526
Credits:
- Nominated by NotAGenious (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: I'll try to combine https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eagle_S_on_the_map_of_MarineTraffic,_in_relation_to_the_Estlink_2_incident.png with the cropped version of the Estlink map if I get a chance to do so. A significant event mentioned in multiple international news sources. NotAGenious (talk) 14:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as it's yet clear the exact cause, whether intentional sabotage or something else. Just having massive reporting doesn't necessarily make it an appropriate WP topic since WP is not a newspaper. Masem (t) 16:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that finding an exact cause should be a requirement for appearing on the main page: the article, which has speculation from reliable sources, is useful by itself. NotAGenious (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose since it's not the first cable damaged in the area this past month and I doubt the impact will be anywhere near the Nord Stream sabotage in 2022. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 17:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:SPECULATION. Sorry, but we don’t post speculations.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- it's confirmed that an outside force destroyed the cable, just the cause is under investigation NotAGenious (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support there's nothing speculative about an international sabotage incident that is an act of economic terrorism, and given the type of incident it is we may never know the full true story (just like in falsified elections for example), that shouldn't barr a posting though; WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a compelling argument either. Abcmaxx (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- The blurb speculates that the incident was caused by a Russian oil tanker (this isn't even mentioned in the article). Furthermore, the article is in bad shape to demonstrate why this incident is significant.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- the article does mention it. NotAGenious (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Now that it's improved, yes, but it didn't when I wrote the comment.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, it was.
the tanker Eagle S, registered to the Cook Islands and part of Russia's shadow fleet...
NotAGenious (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)The police confirmed that the tanker is suspected of having caused the failure
- No, it was.
- Now that it's improved, yes, but it didn't when I wrote the comment.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- the article does mention it. NotAGenious (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- The blurb speculates that the incident was caused by a Russian oil tanker (this isn't even mentioned in the article). Furthermore, the article is in bad shape to demonstrate why this incident is significant.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, although the blurb needs to be updated. A bigger story here is that Finland has seized a Russian tanker suspected of being involved in cutting the cable.[14] Nsk92 (talk) 23:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support even on the off-chance it was accidental, still a series incident. –DMartin 01:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've added an alternative blurb and #Reactions. NotAGenious (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Notified WT:FINLAND and WT:ESTONIA for further input here. NotAGenious (talk) 18:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support ArionStar (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Per above, do not add votes without giving your reason. Stephen 07:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's a major incident with huge coverage and international reactions. ArionStar (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Per above, do not add votes without giving your reason. Stephen 07:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Unusual international incident that our well-sourced article is being updated on. No tags, though the redlinks are arguably distracting. NATO response is highly notable. Given increasing tensions in the Baltic and the continuing news coverage, this altblurb is a good fit for ITN. Jusdafax (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - There was a covering of the Baltic Sea Disruptions in current events a few weeks ago. This is also notable due to rising geopolitical tensions. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Important enough in the context of the present cold war between East and West. Tradediatalk 02:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is this stale? The earliest item on ITN is from December 26. Natg 19 (talk) 07:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- If we're going with the alternative blurb, it's actually the 26th. If we want a blurb telling about the transfer to Porvoo for investigation, it was yesterday, the 29th. NotAGenious (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- The admins didn't check the consensus in time. A pity. ArionStar (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've added a second alt blurb (transfer to Porvoo) and request further comments.
- If we're going with the alternative blurb, it's actually the 26th. If we want a blurb telling about the transfer to Porvoo for investigation, it was yesterday, the 29th. NotAGenious (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
2024 Chadian parliamentary election
[edit]Blurb: Chad holds its legislative elections that have been delayed several times since 2011. (Post)
News source(s): [15]
Credits:
- Nominated by History6042 (talk · give credit)
- Wait until official results are in. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 01:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
(Posted blurb) RD/Blurb Jimmy Carter
[edit]Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: Former American president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jimmy Carter dies at the age of 100 (Post)
Alternative blurb: Former United States president and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jimmy Carter dies at the age of 100.
Alternative blurb II: Former president of the United States and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jimmy Carter dies at the age of 100.
Alternative blurb III: Nobel Peace laureate and former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, behind the campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis, dies at 100.
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:
- Nominated by Nableezy (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Definite Support No questions about it, as a former president and humanitarian that recently passed away. He a left lasting legacy and impact on the world. -- Rager7 (talk)
- Support blurb - obviously. No quality concerns as its a GA. --estar8806 (talk) ★ 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb The death of a former US President is notable, and the story is being reported by basically every source. Gust Justice (talk) 21:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb - A bit more of an update is needed, and a few floating "is" etc are still about, but obviously this should be a blurb. Departure– (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- These seem to have been fixed. Mooonswimmer 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support - Death of a former president. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. - Sebbog13 (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb Oldest former U.S. president ever and it's a GA. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 21:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Support blurb - I've been vocal about the US-bias of many nominations here. But this is a no-brainer. Nfitz (talk) 21:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb This should be an uncontroversial one. No quality concerns. May he rest in peace. Vanilla Wizard 💙 21:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb no brainer, article is in good shape Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 21:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb, Normally against US-bias but I think this is a fairly straightforward yes to a blurb here. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb with picture - extraordinarily influential figure, especially given his prolonged and impactful post-presidential career. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb Article is updated and a GA. Mooonswimmer 21:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted blurb charlotte 👸🎄 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is it a caching error? I don't see it. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- It should be there now. I couldn't see it earlier either. Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is it a caching error? I don't see it. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 21:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb per above. Grimes2 (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb/picture blurb GA article of a significant U.S. president. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Added altblurb2 -- AFAICT we usually say "president of X" not "X president", e.g. right now with Manmohan Singh. Giraffer (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction! 31.44.227.152 (talk) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support I think it's pretty evident; rest well. Nishi (talk 21:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support blurb with picture, but suggest the following expansion to honor what he described as his most important legacy:
– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Nobel Peace laureate and former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, behind the campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis, dies at 100.
- Weak oppose only the part mentioning dracunculiasis, since it's only briefly mentioned once in the target article. Support everything else. Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm adding more; it's probably his most important work in terms of overall impact, but nobody's heard of it. Carter, along with Viktor Zhdanov, is probably one of two human beings who can claim credit for eradicating a major disease. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- (BTW this isn't me saying this, it's Carter—seeing them dead was his last wish.) – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 01:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose only the part mentioning dracunculiasis, since it's only briefly mentioned once in the target article. Support everything else. Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting - charlotte, would you be willing to also add "Nobel laureate" to the blurb, as suggested by the blurbs listed? Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think him being a Nobel laureate is significant enough (relative to him being president) to include in the blurb, but happy to add it/have it added if consensus here/one of the ITN admins think it should be there. charlotte 👸🎄 22:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- That was the blurb supported by everybody? nableezy - 22:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think him being a Nobel laureate is significant enough (relative to him being president) to include in the blurb, but happy to add it/have it added if consensus here/one of the ITN admins think it should be there. charlotte 👸🎄 22:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality (but its been posted so too late for this) - the article does not provide a reason why he was a great or major figure - even though I know this should be the case. The Legacy section addresses his mediocere presidency but does not touch on his post-presidency efforts which is where this factor is coming from. I know this can be made, either from existing sources or from the obits coming out, but this should really be in place, a crystal clear section for reader to review of why a person was posted as a blurb on death, rather than all the hand-waving that is going on. Also, we should not be assuming that every former world leader should be blurbed. Masem (t) 21:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Your wishes are demanding. Support addition of Nobel Prize laureate, only presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Barack Obama, Al Gore (Vice) are recipients. Grimes2 (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The final paragraph of the lede & the lengthy Post-presidency (1981–2024) section do a fine enough job articulating his post-presidency efforts that opposing posting altogether is a bit much. That said, there is a lot of information in Post-presidency of Jimmy Carter which could be used to further expand the section on his main biographical page. Vanilla Wizard 💙 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The statement in the lede "but his post-presidency period (the longest in U.S. history) has received near-universal praise, including a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002." is not directly supported by sources in the bio article, though I'm sure the post-presidency article has that. This is a quality issue that should have been addressed before posting; I'm not doubting this, but absence of this type of information with sources on the main bio page is a problem even if that seems apparently obvious. Masem (t) 04:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support RIP. Davey2116 (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support for it being posted. Storied career, amazing, that he had such long marriage. BilboBeggins (talk) 22:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support, at least he made it to 100. Sahaib (talk) 23:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Can Nobel laureate be added to the blurb as the nomination that all the support votes at the time of posting were referencing? Carters post-presidency is widely regarded as a defining trait of his life. nableezy - 03:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support addition of Nobel laureate, as this is prominently noted, often in the headlines, for major media sources covering this death. BD2412 T 03:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support: Rest in peace to an incredible man, while not the most spectacular during his presidency, he definitely shaped a shining legacy after leaving office. Carter will continue to live on as one of the most memorable presidents the United States has ever had. Tofusaurus (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support Article is in good shape, has been updated to the bone and Carter is an example of what warrants a death blurb. Remarkable legacy, treated harshly by history. Rest well, to a great humanitarian and humble being. Support adding Nobel to blurb I mean, he's also a nobel winner and most obits are including his laureate status to their headlines as well. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Added Nobel laureate. charlotte 👸🎄 08:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Queen of Hearts: please could you revert this. You were correct in your comment above. There is a standard format for death blurbs, particularly of former leaders, and we don't usually "editorialise" in ITN blurbs. Him being the preskdent is the reason he's blurbed rather than his Nobel prize, and it should simply state that, in the same way as the former Indian PM further down. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t editorializing and since when did we substitute an admins judgment over consensus for a blurb? nableezy - 09:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's totally editorializing. Inserting fluff about Carter winning a Nobel prize that isn't really relevant to the story of his death. To maintain NPOV and avoid bias at ITN, we stick to a standard blurb format for all politician deaths rather than going with bespoke wording for individuals that people happen to like, based on whatever random WP:LOCALCONSENSUS forms. Henry Kissinger also won a Nobel prize, but our blurb on him made no mention of that, so why the difference here? Admins are precisely supposed to use their judgment in these matters, as indeed charlotte did above, that's always been part of the remit. — Amakuru (talk) 10:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Amakuru, no need to add extra honours when its the office that he held that the vast majority of the world know him for. We didn't list Singh with his Indian of the Year or his Adam Smith awards so why do we need to further decorate Carter when President is prestigious enough. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Removed the Nobel. Stephen 12:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- To be fair, the Adam Smith Prize or the Indian of the Year honor is not even close to the Nobel Prize. When Kofi Annan died, we listed his Nobel honor into the blurb. Same with Shimon Peres. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t fluff, and there isn’t any overriding consensus that you can point to to claim that this is a local one that can be ignored. This is one of his main legacies, his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency. It is not fluff, it is not editorializing, and that part of the main page is not the fiefdom of a few admins here. This should be restored and this discussions consensus respected. nableezy - 12:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Even if
his work for habitat for humanity and the Carter center are absolutely as notable as his presidency
, a questionable premise, he would be notable for that and not for being a Nobel prize laureate. Look at the first sentence of his article as it's always been: Only mentions president (and later humanitarian), no mention of Nobel laureate. The article itself indicates that being a laureate wasn't notable at all in comparison to what he's actually primarily known for, which is a president of the United States. Therefore (imo), saying that he's a Nobel prize laureate in ITN would indeed fall under UNDUE editorializing fluff. spintheer (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Only mentions president (and later humanitarian)
So... it mentions the work that earned him the Nobel Prize. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- He's notable for his work as a president and a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate or the receiver or any other prizes (or otherwise) that resulted from his work as a president and a humanitarian. If you want to push for adding in the blurb that he was a humanitarian, be my guest. spintheer (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Its almost as if your point hadn’t been proven false before your first response here nableezy - 03:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- My point is that if the article indicates that Carter's notable for first being a president, and second being a humanitarian, ITN should reflect that and not go off on its own bizarre mini RFCs to establish local consensus about Carter's notability outside of the article's talk page. If you want to establish that Carter was as notable for being a Nobel lauereate as he was for being the president of the United States or a humanitarian, then first get that changed in the first sentence of the article and then come back here and have the blurb reflect this change. spintheer (talk) 04:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Even if
- I have to agree with Amakuru, no need to add extra honours when its the office that he held that the vast majority of the world know him for. We didn't list Singh with his Indian of the Year or his Adam Smith awards so why do we need to further decorate Carter when President is prestigious enough. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's totally editorializing. Inserting fluff about Carter winning a Nobel prize that isn't really relevant to the story of his death. To maintain NPOV and avoid bias at ITN, we stick to a standard blurb format for all politician deaths rather than going with bespoke wording for individuals that people happen to like, based on whatever random WP:LOCALCONSENSUS forms. Henry Kissinger also won a Nobel prize, but our blurb on him made no mention of that, so why the difference here? Admins are precisely supposed to use their judgment in these matters, as indeed charlotte did above, that's always been part of the remit. — Amakuru (talk) 10:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Every death blurb (for death by old age or other natural causes) leaves it as the principle profession that the person had, and avoids editorization. Definitely should not be adding "Nobel winner" here. — Masem (t) 13:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- And just to add, keeping the death blurb to just the profession prevents further bickering around the whole death blurb nomination aspect already. The inclusion of profession and profession only is a nice neutral way to present the blurb without trying to fight consensus on what other apsects to include. If the article is of good quality, other key factors (like Carter's humanitarism) should be identified within the lede. — Masem (t) 13:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t true as demonstrated by the examples cited already. Whatever, this place doesn’t exactly abide by our rules anyway, what’s one more example? nableezy - 13:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, media reporting on the death widely reference the Nobel Prize in what would be the equivalent of our blurb. See:
- Reuters: "Jimmy Carter, former US president and Nobel Peace Prize recipient, dead at 100"
- ABC News leads with "Jimmy Carter, the former U.S. president known as a champion of international human rights both during and after his White House tenure and who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his lifetime of dedication to that cause, has died at 100";
- The Washington Post leads with "Jimmy Carter, a no-frills Southern governor with a mile-wide smile who was elected president in 1976 and served only one term before leading an extraordinary post-presidential life that included the Nobel Peace Prize, died Sunday at his home in Plains, Georgia...";
- BBC News reports, "after leaving the White House with low approval ratings, his reputation was restored through humanitarian work which earned him the Nobel Peace Prize";
- The Guardian reports that "Carter spent the decades afterward focused on international relations and human rights, efforts that won him the Nobel peace prize in 2002";
- The Associated Press blurb on the subject says "Former President Jimmy Carter, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and the longest-living chief executive in U.S. history, has died".
- This is not fluff, this is the key fact. BD2412 T 17:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- That isn’t editorializing and since when did we substitute an admins judgment over consensus for a blurb? nableezy - 09:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Queen of Hearts: please could you revert this. You were correct in your comment above. There is a standard format for death blurbs, particularly of former leaders, and we don't usually "editorialise" in ITN blurbs. Him being the preskdent is the reason he's blurbed rather than his Nobel prize, and it should simply state that, in the same way as the former Indian PM further down. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post posting support blurb No brainer support for death of former head of state/government. News across the world, article is in fantastic shape. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 13:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support inclusion of Nobel Prize and agree with other supporters above, his article quotes Polls of historians and political scientists generally rank Carter as a below-average president. Scholars and the public more favorably view his post-presidency, and winning a noble prize precisely shows this with other things. It may seem editorializing to few, but many disagree. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 17:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This was closed, who reopened it? Can someone re-close it? Further blurb deliberation should be at WP:ERRORS. Departure– (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is an editorial decision, not a content error.—Bagumba (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Significant blurb changes are at ITNC. Errors are used only for small corrections. — Masem (t) 19:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support including something about the humanitarian post-presidency career (e.g. the Nobel), which is the thing Carter is known for. It would make more sense to cut out the presidency TBH. (Though I wouldn't do that either). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: all blurbs in this widely-supported nomination mention the Nobel Peace Prize, showing a very clear consensus for its inclusion. So why are we unilaterally not including it? RachelTensions (talk) 21:30, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Adding my support for including "Nobel Peace Prize laureate" in the blurb; his post-presidency was arguably as transformative as his time as president, and has received comparable RS coverage in the obits. Given that all the proposed blurbs included the Nobel, I did not feel the need to state this in my !vote above. Davey2116 (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose mention of Nobel Prize per Amakuru as it is editorializing the blurb to choose to add that secondary piece of info, which wasn’t included in Henry Kissinger’s blurb. Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 05:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Restored Nobel to the blurb. It's been in the blurb candiates from the beginning, and there is consensus since the post for its inclusion. As mentioned above with Annan and Peres previously, it's not unprecedented. In other fields, I also see some recent examples beyond a simple listing of their occupation.[16][17] This is not required, and there are merits to avoiding squabbles with a more vanilla blurb. But there's no current rule at WP:ITN barring it, and the community can apply WP:WEIGHT, where needed, as was done here. This is consistent with the WP:YESPOV policy:
—Bagumba (talk) 05:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)As such, the neutral point of view does not mean the exclusion of certain points of view; rather, it means including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight.
- The community establishes WP:WEIGHT in the article's talk page, not in ITN. The article indicates that Carter is first and foremost notable for being a president and secondarily as a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate. If ITN doesn't directly reflect that's written in the corresponding article, this sets a ridiculous precedent where anything can be written in ITN blurbs so long as there is local consensus for it here (if tomorrow we'll have a blurb that Carter has come back to life while the article's obviously unchanged, and enough people vote for that blurb, would that also be posted?) ITN discussions have significantly less editorial rigor and oversight than an actual article talk page, and shouldn't be the place to make substantive arguments about content, especially ones that very clearly would not, and have not, passed in the article's talk page itself (e.g. in this case that Carter's Nobel prize is anywhere near as notable as his occupation as a president). spintheer (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
this sets a ridiculous precedent
: I had written, "This is not required". This blurb, in itself, does not set a precedent, any more than Annon or Peres did. The community is free to update WP:ITNBLURB to provide more guidance to posters on blurbs w.r.t. article leads, if there is consensus. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 07:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- He was a noted humanitarian, not a Nobel prize winner. And which Nobel anyways? Explains nothing about what the prize was for. Stephen 09:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- The blurb says Nobel Peace. Nobody had proposed humanitarian in the blurb, but feel free to gain consensus whether it makes more sense to be generic. —Bagumba (talk) 09:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- He was a noted humanitarian, not a Nobel prize winner. And which Nobel anyways? Explains nothing about what the prize was for. Stephen 09:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- The community establishes WP:WEIGHT in the article's talk page, not in ITN. The article indicates that Carter is first and foremost notable for being a president and secondarily as a humanitarian, not for being a Nobel laureate. If ITN doesn't directly reflect that's written in the corresponding article, this sets a ridiculous precedent where anything can be written in ITN blurbs so long as there is local consensus for it here (if tomorrow we'll have a blurb that Carter has come back to life while the article's obviously unchanged, and enough people vote for that blurb, would that also be posted?) ITN discussions have significantly less editorial rigor and oversight than an actual article talk page, and shouldn't be the place to make substantive arguments about content, especially ones that very clearly would not, and have not, passed in the article's talk page itself (e.g. in this case that Carter's Nobel prize is anywhere near as notable as his occupation as a president). spintheer (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Post-posting support for inclusion of some mention of his post-presidency humanitarian efforts, whether that means mentioning the Nobel Peace Prize or some other language. (I already !voted so this second !vote is only on the language and not the notability or quality.) It isn't a double standard that we didn't mention this for Kissinger. It was simply less relevant for Kissinger and more relevant for Carter. The post-presidency work Carter did to earn that Nobel was arguably more transformative than anything he did in his role as president, so mentioning it separately from his presidency makes sense. The same can't be said of Kissinger. I'd still be fine with replacing the word Nobel Laureate with the word humanitarian since some editors take issue with the decoration, but I'm also fine with just leaving it how it is right now and keeping the Nobel Laureate phrasing. Just as long as the phrasing acknowledges that this is a unique case where him being the president was perhaps not even the most important thing he did with his life. This isn't setting a dangerous precedent or slippery slope, he legitimately may be the only president in US history and one of few leaders worldwide who left the highest office in the land and then went on to do bigger and better things after that. Vanilla Wizard 💙 14:26, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
simply less relevant for Kissinger
is an opinion and the double standard here. Both individuals won a Nobel prize, and the articles of both individuals indicate that neither are notable for receiving that Nobel prize. The only discernible difference is personal opinion in ITN. spintheer (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- It would be a double standard if my position was that the Nobel Prize is itself inherently blurbworthy, but that isn't my view. It's worth mentioning separately for Carter because the reason why he received the award was for noteworthy contributions separate from his presidency. Kissinger's award was for his official duties as the Secretary of State, not for something separate. It's not about liking Carter more than Kissinger. For transparency I also won't deny that myself and likely many others do hold Carter in higher regard than Kissinger, but this isn't relevant to the discussion or the reasoning. It's simply about communicating that Carter's post-presidency is at least half of the reason why he's blurbworthy, even to those who are against blurbing just any former US president. With Kissinger, his time as Secretary of State was the sole reason. As I said before, I'm fine with replacing the award with the word humanitarian if it looks too decorative. I just don't take issue with the current wording. Vanilla Wizard 💙 16:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, then say humanitarian, not nobel laureate. Ok, it looks like this isn't going to change, but this is an error that'll come back to bite us the next time somebody decides to editorialize some other news event. spintheer (talk) 16:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- It would be a double standard if my position was that the Nobel Prize is itself inherently blurbworthy, but that isn't my view. It's worth mentioning separately for Carter because the reason why he received the award was for noteworthy contributions separate from his presidency. Kissinger's award was for his official duties as the Secretary of State, not for something separate. It's not about liking Carter more than Kissinger. For transparency I also won't deny that myself and likely many others do hold Carter in higher regard than Kissinger, but this isn't relevant to the discussion or the reasoning. It's simply about communicating that Carter's post-presidency is at least half of the reason why he's blurbworthy, even to those who are against blurbing just any former US president. With Kissinger, his time as Secretary of State was the sole reason. As I said before, I'm fine with replacing the award with the word humanitarian if it looks too decorative. I just don't take issue with the current wording. Vanilla Wizard 💙 16:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Remove Ongoing: 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon
[edit]Nominator's comments: The Ongoing section would benefit from some shortening, and this item seems like the best candidate for removal. The Israeli incursion in Lebanon is not in the news anymore (and the last event mentioned in the article dates back to 17 Dec). This is in contrast to the war in Gaza, or Israel's actions in Yemen, which are much more prominently covered in global news. Khuft (talk) 19:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing—looks like the most sensible thing to trim. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 23:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose the only reason nothing is happening is because the 2024 Israel–Lebanon ceasefire agreement is in place. However than will end soon as it is only a 60 day ceasefire. 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC) History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:33, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- If it ends and the war restarts, we post again PrecariousWorlds (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Im wondering if maybe we need to do a () next to Israel-Hamas war with all of the other Middle East battles that are also involving Israel, like Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, so on. TheCorriynial (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- There was a recent suggestion to include the entire listing of conflicts in the Middle East, but the problem is that they are not all directly related. While we can point to the Israel-Lebonon conflict as directly related to the Israel-Hamas one, events in Yemen or Syria are absolutely not part of that. That makes it all synthesis to combine them all. --Masem (t) 21:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing, no updates recently. BilboBeggins (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing This is no longer hot, as indicated by lack of recent updates. There are low intensity incidents happening and might continue for months, but does not justify "Ongoing". Tradediatalk 02:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose not only has Israel violated the ceasefire almost every single day its been in force, but there is no signs that they are going to continue the ceasefire after its 60 days. Scuba 15:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ongoing is not about if the event is still going on, but if the target article or an appropriate subarticle has been receiving updates, which has not been happening here. — Masem (t) 15:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removal Lack of recent updates; per nom. If hostilities resume after the ceasefire, this can be re-nominated for addition at that time. SpencerT•C 06:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Houston Tornado Outbreak
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Tornado outbreak in the Houston Area killing 2 people and injuring many others (Post)
Alternative blurb: 2 people dead after tornado outbreak in the Houston area
Support but with a completely reworded blurb. Three or more are dead, so the blurb is innacurate. How about "At least three people are killed during a widespread tornado outbreak across the Southern United States." I oppose adding an image as of now.
- Meh. oppose per below. EF5 20:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Seems pretty minor, hard to find coverage outside the US media. Nfitz (talk) 20:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - not important overall. @EF5: we hardly post tornado outbreaks on ITN, and the smallest one I think that got posted was Rolling Fork's outbreak. The most recent was March 31, 2023, and almost every outbreak since then (with the possible exceptions of May 25 and April 26) have been well below the bar of importance for ITN. I'll add conditional weak support if the record-breaking claim of the Port Arthur tornado's duration is confirmed, but I highly doubt that. Departure– (talk) 20:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not significant, at least not yet. Very minor. Setarip (talk) 20:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The oddness here is how late in the year this came, likely a result of global warming, but even with that, the relatively small death toll makes this a minor outbreak in the larger scheme of things. --Masem (t) 21:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Late-season outbreaks have always happened. We posted the last big December outbreak (the one in Kentucky, USA) on merit as an outbreak, not based on climate change. I couldn't tell you why actual climate-change related blurbs (such as the yearly "hottest day in history" blurbs) never get posted. Departure– (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Because as long as there's little progress to stall climate change by major nations, these records are always going to get broken year after year. And the 2021 outbreak was likely posted due to the high death toll (70+). — Masem (t) 22:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Late-season outbreaks have always happened. We posted the last big December outbreak (the one in Kentucky, USA) on merit as an outbreak, not based on climate change. I couldn't tell you why actual climate-change related blurbs (such as the yearly "hottest day in history" blurbs) never get posted. Departure– (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose Tragic, but it’s a typical tornado outbreak. Two deaths is very small compared to very notable tornado outbreaks like the 2011 Super Outbreak. INeedSupport 🎄 21:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis
[edit]Blurb: 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis continues with Mikheil Kavelashvili inaugurated and Salome Zourabichvili claiming to remain President. (Post)
Alternative blurb: 2024–2025 Georgian constitutional crisis continues with Mikheil Kavelashvili inaugurated while Salome Zourabichvili says she remains President.
Alternative blurb II: Amidst opposition protests, Mikheil Kavelashvili inaugurated President of Georgia.
Alternative blurb III: A governmental crisis occurs in Georgia, as Mikheil Kavelashvili is inaugurated as president while incumbent Salome Zourabichvili intends to remain in office.
Alternative blurb IV: Mikheil Kavelashvili is inaugurated as President of Georgia while incumbent Salome Zourabichvili intends to remain in office amidst a constitutional crisis.
News source(s): Al Jazeera; The Guardian; Associated Press; BBC
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Boud (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: The 2024–2025 Georgian post-election protests that have accompanied this crisis have been ongoing daily for two months with the biggest participation estimated at around 100,000 people - several percent of the total Georgian population. Boud (talk) 11:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The expression "claiming that" is a bit WP:WEASELly;
and Salome Zourabichvili stating that she retains her legitimacy as President
would be more neutral, avoiding the connotation that Wikipedia is sceptical about her POV. I've added altblurb which seems less weaselly to me. Boud (talk) 11:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC) - Ongoing? The nomination is not clear whether it's proposing this as an ongoing entry. Many other places have ongoing political tensions and rivalries so I reckon we need some big incident or civil war for this to stand out. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- The event itself - the overall crisis - is ongoing, but the Western mainstream media news coverage is not intense enough to justify ongoing in the ITN sense. This is not a proposal for ITN "Ongoing". In terms of the wording, it would be inaccurate to suggest that today's inauguration was a sudden crisis - it's a key symbolic event within the overall crisis - so "continuing" in the blurb is accurate. Boud (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely has more encyclopedic value than the electoral college vote a few weeks earlier. Depending on how the world reacts, it could be a repeat of the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Scaramouche33 (talk) 13:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose There is a similar Ongoing constitutional crisis in Somalia, WP:ITNUPDATE. QalasQalas (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Response Somalia has been in a civil war for decades now, it has gotten its place in the spotlight but has faded away with time. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
strongweak support altblurb2 came here to nominate it, glad to see I was beaten to it. The inauguration is perhaps more important than the non-popular election itself with the repercussions per Scaramouche33 (day-before form PM and GD leader was sanctioned with many other by the state department). What the now former president claims is not relevant encyclopaedically/ITN. It is for the sub-article/s though.She'll likely be arrested before the new year if not tonight. It's 21:15 atm.Doesn't seem like much more than western msm blather quoting a french woman, she has left the presidential palace, despite claiming there is a train there and who will move her.Sportsnut24 (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)- Support Definitely something to take note of. Additionally, I suspect Russia might invade Georgia again, to prop up the Dream Party. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb 3 per above. Added altblurb 3. Departure– (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- oppose altblurb3 she has left the presidential palace. She cannot conduct an enforeceable actions such as signing bills.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support No one knows who the president of georgia is now, but it is an inauguration Setarip (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- everybody knows who the new prez is after being sworn in with his predecessor leaving the presidential palace.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Leaving Orbeliani Palace has some but not much significance; it's not the presidential palace, it's a presidential palace; Zourabichvili was the first president to reside there: "Salome Zurabishvili to relocate Presidential Residence from Avlabari to Orbeliani Palace", 29 Nov 2018. Boud (talk) 01:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- everybody knows who the new prez is after being sworn in with his predecessor leaving the presidential palace.Sportsnut24 (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Important enough in the context of cold war between East and West. Georgia is one of the battlegrounds. Tradediatalk 02:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Article is a bit short for a leadership dispute of this magnitude, but it's good enough for posting. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:42, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per TDKR. ArionStar (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- @admins, please, check the consensus. ArionStar (talk) 02:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Per TDKR. ArionStar (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Jeju Air Flight 2216
[edit]Blurb: A Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 crashes at Muan International Airport, South Korea, after hitting a fence while attempting to land with 47 casualties reported out of 181 passengers on board. (Post)
Alternative blurb: At least 47 people are killed when a Jeju Air plane carrying 181 passengers crashed at Muan International Airport in South Korea.
Alternative blurb II: Jeju Air Flight 2216 crashes at Muan International Airport, South Korea, killing at least 47.
News source(s): (Bloomberg)
Credits:
- Nominated by QalasQalas (talk · give credit)
- Created by Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: I think it needs a bit of work.
- Support Absolutely horrific footage, definitely worthy of the front page. --MaximumMangoCloset (talk) 02:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support holiday season is deadly this year. ArionStar (talk) 02:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Terrible year for Korea PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely three deadly crashes within a month. QalasQalas (talk) 02:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support A no brainer, major plane crash with dozens of fatalities. JDiala (talk) 02:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt Blurb III Article probably needs its quality improved, but absolutely a notable event. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 02:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Alt Blurb II in line with the Flight 8243. Also, the death toll has reportly risen to 47. Unnamelessness (talk) 02:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Considering that if the death count ends up being over 132 it will have been the deadliest crash since 2020, this is quite a major incident and it deserves to be here. (offtopic but why was both the start and end of this year so bad for aviation?) interstatefive 02:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support could become the deadliest crash this year with 178 possible fatalities and its already the second deadliest. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST)
- Strong Support Dozens of fatalities have been found. Major news coverage. Article is a bit short but that is because there is no conclusive info yet, as the incident happened three hours ago. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 9:49 PM, 28 December 2024 (EST)
- Support seems to have extensive coverage from South Korean News sources, some western sources are also picking up on the accident. Yosh56 (talk) 10:02 PM. 28 December 2024 (EST)
- Strong support altblurb 2. For a new disaster article less than half an hour old it's of fantastic quality. This might be less geopolitically important than the crash in Kazakhstan but the human toll is telling. Departure– (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Altburlb II Fatality numbers can be updated via WP:ERRORS#Errors with "In the news". – robertsky (talk) 03:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
December 28
[edit]
December 28, 2024
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Shigeko Sasamori
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Survivor of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and an advocate for peace and nuclear disarmament. Died on December 15. Death reported on December 28. TJMSmith (talk) 02:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Kari Dziedzic
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ‘’Minnesota Public Radio’’
Credits:
- Nominated by Malvoliox (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Sitting Minnesota state senator and former majority leader, hoping to expand the article a little/add electoral history and more details about political work, but also want to make sure we can clean up any issues with citations etc. that I didn’t catch. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 14:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Malvoliox, the better source needed tag should ideally be resolved. Otherwise, support. charlotte 👸🎄 01:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Replaced the bad source with a reliable recent one that details the case. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 15:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Charles Dolan
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hollywood Reporter
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American billionaire businessman, founder of Cablevision and HBO. 240F:7A:6253:1:9DCE:E014:DC2:B389 (talk) 07:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, article is well-cited and I don't see any quality issues. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, article is long enough and well-sourced, with no apparent issues. Could use some spot verification. Mooonswimmer 01:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted charlotte 👸🎄 01:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
December 27
[edit]
December 27, 2024
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
RD: Ruth Butler
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:
- Created and nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American art historian and academic. Died November 28. Death reported on December 27. TJMSmith (talk) 03:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Charles Shyer
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by 31.44.227.152 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Rusted AutoParts (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American film director, screenwriter, and producer. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Charlie Maxwell
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by cbl62 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American baseball outfielder (1947-1964), an All-Star in 1956 and 1957, known as "Sunday Charlie" and "The Sabbath Slugger" for his propensity to hit home runs on Sundays Cbl62 (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support well referenced and comprehensive. Abcmaxx (talk) 23:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Shall we wait till late Saturday to post this on the RD line so that he can appear on MainPage on Sunday (US time)? --PFHLai (talk) 15:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fine by me and yes, this does seem appropriate given his nickname. It will have fallen off this page by then, but that should not stop you from posting it at the desired time, PFHLai. I've certainly posted items before that had already been archived. Schwede66 18:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
RD: Olivia Hussey
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:C85F:CD98:861D:B7DF (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: British-Argentine actress. 240F:7A:6253:1:C85F:CD98:861D:B7DF (talk) 03:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Weak support, found two uncited claims, which I've added CN tags to. Article is fine otherwise.Support: CN issues now resolved. No more outstanding article issues from what I can see. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 11:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)- Support Article in good shape, cn issues appear to have been solved. Yakikaki (talk) 18:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. --IDB.S (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Filmography sourcing needs improvement.—Bagumba (talk) 15:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Filmography needs ref work. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Greg Gumbel
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
- Updated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit) and CAWylie (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American sportscaster who called N.F.L. and N.C.A.A. games for CBS. Thriley (talk) 02:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support First African-American sportscaster to call the Super Bowl. SigKauffman54 (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's not relevant here, only article quality is. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose for now due to justified orange tag for lack of citations. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)- Fixed up, support. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Not Quite Ready A handful of CN tags and there is currently no mention of his death in the body.-Ad Orientem (talk) 16:25, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ad Orientem: & @Muboshgu: Article has been fixed up to shape. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article is now in good shape. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted charlotte 👸🎄 01:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) Kamal Adwan hospital burning
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Israeli troops attack the Kamal Adwan hospital, the last one remaining in the northern Gaza Strip, forcing its staff and patients to leave (Post)
News source(s): Al-Jazeera, Associated Press
Credits:
- Nominated by Vice regent (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Oppose basically covered by ongoing; I don't see how this one specific event is that significant to bring out of that. Just more to add onto the pile of war crime charges that international courts have against Israel here. --Masem (t) 20:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Masem. The Kip (contribs) 22:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Covered by ongoing. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Already covered by ongoing, and is just one of many war crimes already done by Israel. By far the biggest one done. Setarip (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sad but not a major event of the war. ArionStar (talk) 19:37, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Impeachment of Han Duck-soo
[edit]Blurb: The Acting President of South Korea and Prime minister, Han Duck-soo (pictured) is impeached by the National Assembly. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Acting President of South Korea and Prime minister, Han Duck-soo (pictured) is impeached by the National Assembly and is succeeded by Choi Sang-mok.
News source(s): BBC News, Reuters, South Korea National Assembly E-law Library KWNews (in Korean)
Credits:
- Nominated by Haers6120 (talk · give credit)
- Created by Queen of Hearts (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Borgenland (talk · give credit)
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Impeachement of Acting President of South Korea is unprecedented, and deputy prime minister will be both acting President and acting Prime Minister will also unprecedented. I also feel that we may need an ongoing article title like "2024-2025 South Korea Political Crisis" Haers6120 (talk) 06:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- UPDATE: Han seems accept National Assembly's decision [19]. Haers6120 (talk) 08:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support charlotte 👸🎄 08:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality the direct cause 2024 South Korean martial law crisis and the subsequent protests are buried deep in the article rather than in the lede and the article goes at length about procedural matters which is great but it's missing all the other context. Furthermore the martial law and protest articles should really be in the blurb. An event infobox would be nice too. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- we could nominate a seperate ongoing article if needed. Haers6120 (talk) 08:09, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that your concerns are enough to oppose on quality, but I will try to work on this. Already added an infobox. charlotte 👸🎄 08:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Takipoint123 (talk) 08:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose SK's government seems to be gridlocked and this impeachment just seems to be a procedural tactic which passed easily because only a simple majority was required as this was considered a ministerial-level matter. It reminds me of the difficulty in getting a stable Speaker of the US House. It's internal politics and there's more to come before they are out of the woods. Other countries such as France and Germany have similar issues and so we should have a fairly high bar for posting. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support significant news from the crisis Setarip (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Change of head of state and effective executive of the nation. And isn't this ITNR? Gotitbro (talk) 11:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's ITNR, because Han was explicitly only the acting president, and is in his turn only suspended and not deposed. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well the nom is listed as such and I don't think our ITNR rules for heads of state/government (state leaders) have ever been that granular to exclude such changes [of acting versus normally elected/appointed].
- Also, I think we need to appreciate the difference between those countries where single state leaders hold effective power (South Korea) versus where where power distribution maybe more shared (France, Germany that have been cited here). Gotitbro (talk) 15:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's ITNR, because Han was explicitly only the acting president, and is in his turn only suspended and not deposed. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Clearly the first impeachment following the attempt to declare martial law was major. Following that impeachment and resignation, the role of acting president fell to the PM, which was not meant to be a long-term determination. This impeaching is a result of more political infighting, and nothing specifically that Duck-soo did, and far less impactful than the original impeachment. Its basically a game of partisan musical chairs, since now the finance minister becomes next in line as acting president. --Masem (t) 13:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support altblurb Notable event. Han is the first acting president is the country's history to be impeached. This is a significant update from the fallout of the martial law crisis. Also, the altblurb is best as it illustrates the change in power so to speak. Article is in good shape too. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 13:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - While this is significant, it's part of the continuing crisis. As Andrew notes correctly, France and Germany are also both experiencing unstable government at the moment, and we're not posting blow-by-blow accounts of those to ITN, but only the substantive changes at the top. South Korea's situation, while a bit more volatile, is broadly similar. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- France and Germany are bad analogies in this case, not least because South Korea's case already involves an attempted self-coup and two impeachments. Though I ultimately agree that a third blurb about largely the same crisis might be too much, there may be merit in instead adding this to Ongoing (if it can be maintained). Yo.dazo (talk) 16:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another successful impeachment? Really? Unprecedented event in the South Korea's history. ArionStar (talk) 16:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is another major and unprecedented development in a situation that has already proven itself to be blurb-worthy on at least 2 occasions Rahcmander (talk) 16:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support For this is unprecedented situation and technically change of head of state. Would oppose another impeachment (which is probable in less than a week) as per Andrew. Didgogns (talk) 18:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. The Kip (contribs) 18:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nobody saw this coming This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk)
- Comment This is an extension of the initial coup. The root cause for both, is that for some reason I can't fathom, having a solid majority in the Parliament, doesn't give you any control of the government. Similar to the issues in the USA, but without the ability of the Parliament to pass legislation, or change the speaker. For some reason the party controlling the presidency and PM believe that letting the other party into power is some existential crisis - hence the extremes they'll go to (first illegally, and now legally). This will continue until a presidential election is triggered. I have no doubt the new acting President will be impeached quickly if he doesn't approve the nominations to the constitutional court. Perhaps South Korean Constitutional Crisis or something should be an ongoing? Nfitz (talk) 03:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is there news coverage of the events of this happening near daily? Not really. Just because two events have happened within a month apart doesn't make it an ongoing story, and the ongoing line is far too busy as it is right now to add anything else, particularly something that isn't having near-daily stories. Masem (t) 04:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've seen news reports several times a week since the coup, between the coup, and three impeachment votes. Nfitz (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Is there news coverage of the events of this happening near daily? Not really. Just because two events have happened within a month apart doesn't make it an ongoing story, and the ongoing line is far too busy as it is right now to add anything else, particularly something that isn't having near-daily stories. Masem (t) 04:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support: This is just a greater part of the coup attempt by Yoon, but something I didn't see coming. TansoShoshen (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Admins willing to post ITN: I see consensus to post here. (I am of course far too involved to do it myself.) charlotte 👸🎄 20:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that there's consensus. May I suggest that we wait half a day or so? I've just posted the Juscelino Kubitschek de Oliveira Bridge collapse and it sits in the bottom slot. If we were to post this item now, it'll nuke the bridge article after only a few minutes. Schwede66 20:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Fine with me. charlotte 👸🎄 20:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ah I didn't see this conversation before posting the Jeju crash up. The bridge collapse wasn't removed as today's Featured Article slot is just a tad longer. I am uncertain if we want to post up Han's image as it will be adjacent to the plane crash blurb. – robertsky (talk) 04:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that there's consensus. May I suggest that we wait half a day or so? I've just posted the Juscelino Kubitschek de Oliveira Bridge collapse and it sits in the bottom slot. If we were to post this item now, it'll nuke the bridge article after only a few minutes. Schwede66 20:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted, lost the probe and kept the bridge collapse for a bit longer. Stephen 04:46, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
December 26
[edit]
December 26, 2024
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Reviewers needed) RD: Richard Parsons (businessman)
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): LA Times
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:C8D7:448A:7EA0:D6EA (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American business executive and former CEO of Time Warner. 240F:7A:6253:1:C8D7:448A:7EA0:D6EA (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: John B. Cobb
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Claremont School of Theology
Credits:
- Nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
- Updated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit) and Mrlojo (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American theologian, philosopher and environmentalist. Death announced 27 December. Thriley (talk) 01:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well. --ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 09:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Quite a few paragraphs that don’t end with a reference. Stephen 09:25, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted blurb) RD/Blurb: Manmohan Singh
[edit]Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: Former Prime Minister of India Manmohan Singh (pictured) dies at the age of 92 (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, The Times of India
Credits:
- Nominated by Sportsnut24 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit) and Fylindfotberserk (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Potential blurb, but he's not sitting, so at least RD. Sportsnut24 (talk) 16:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Blurb He was one of the most influential individual of the modern Indian history and was the prime minister of India for a decade. The Degrees and posts held section needs some work but otherwise article is in good shape. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 17:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb Important and influential figure in modern India - he served 2 terms as PM and he was an important figure in liberating India's economy The AP (talk) 17:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose on quality Article has some cn tags and there's a refimprove section tag at the end of the article. Once these issues are addressed, I wouldstrongly support blurb seeing how Singh was a highly influential prime minister of India and a dominant figure in modern Indian politics. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 17:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)- General Support blurb as this is basically there in quality (I see a few noncritical tags but sourcing is basically there) and with the Public Image section, clearly outlines his status as a major figure on Indian politics. Masem (t) 17:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb One of few individuals who significantly shaped world history. As Finance Minister, brought accelerated economic growth to India that continues to this day and has helped raise standard of living for over a billion people and transformed global geopolitics. As Prime Minister, reduced rural poverty, brought India into global nuclear order, averted war in the aftermath of major terrorist attacks, and many other accomplishments. Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 17:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb once outstanding CN tags are fixed. UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Issues fixed @UndercoverClassicist: TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 17:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb Long-serving, influential leader of a major nation. The Kip (contribs) 18:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb Unanimous support for blurb. Grimes2 (talk) 19:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb as per others above. -Abhishikt (talk) 19:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted blurb. charlotte 👸🎄 19:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
References
[edit]Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents:
- ^ "Meghalt Keleti Ágnes". Blikk (in Hungarian). 2 January 2025.