Jump to content

User talk:Missionedit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by DURYODANAN - ""
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Missionedit/Archive 8) (bot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=6 November 2022}}
If you return to editing, please remove the above template.
{{User:Missionedit/navbar}}
{{User:Missionedit/navbar}}
{{Off and On WikiBreak}}
{{Usertalkback|icon=attn}}
{{Usertalkback|icon=attn}}
{{archivebox|auto=yes|search=yes}}
{{archivebox|auto=yes|search=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 70K
|maxarchivesize = 130K
|counter = 2
|counter = 8
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|algo = old(40d)
|archive = User talk:Missionedit/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = User talk:Missionedit/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}


== HELP!!!!!!!!! ==
== WooHoo! ==


{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
Dear Missionedit, <br>
|-
This is my first year on WiI ssipediaI'vend I'm not on very often. I'm really bad with technology but Wikipedia is articlesomething my friends tell me I should use because I have PythonessofDelphihese useless facts in my brain that they say Wikipedia is the place for. Unfortunately, I'm not sure what to edit because I'm afraid of making a mistake and I don't want to make a new page because what if it's really bad and no one likes it? It's taken me a while to contact a host because I'm rather shy by nature and independent. What do I do???????
! rowspan="3" style="vertical-align:top;" |
Sincerely, PythonessofDelphi <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pythonessofdelphi|Pythonessofdelphi]] ([[User talk:Pythonessofdelphi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pythonessofdelphi|contribs]]) 23:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
! style="text-align:left;" | Happy Birthday
:Hello PythonessofDelphi, it's very nice to meet you! I'd be glad to help you with any questions you have :) Would you rather be called PythonessofDelphi or Hope?<br>
| style="text-align:right;" | <small>from the [[WP:BDC|<span style="color:black;">Birthday Committee</span>]]</small>
:If you want to make an article on Wikipedia, I would highly recommend using the [[Wikipedia:Articles for Creation]] wizard. This process helps make sure that your article is notable enough for Wikipedia, and that it has enough sources to support it's facts (it also helps make sure that your article won't get deleted in the future). What topic(s) would you like to create an article about? <br>
|-
:If you have information about a topic that already has an article, feel free to add that info to the article, but you should make sure that any facts you add are backed up with a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. For information on how to put sources in articles, [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] is very helpful. And if an edit you make gets deleted, don't panic :) It happens to everyone, even very experienced editors.<br>
| colspan="2" style="vertical-align:top; text-align:left; background:#99CC00; padding:5px; margin:5px; border:1px dotted black;" |
: I'll be on [[WP:WB|Wikibreak]] for the next week, so I'll take a while for me to respond to any messages you leave me. One last thing--when you post things on talk pages, make sure you type 4 tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) after your post. This will leave your username and the date. Cheerio! ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 01:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
[[File:WikiThanks.png|left]][[File:Balloons-aj.svg|right|50px]]
::Dear Missionedit (Anastasia),
Wishing Missionedit a very '''happy birthday''' on behalf of the '''[[WP:BDC|Wikipedia Birthday Committee]]'''!
::To answer your first question, I would rather be called PythonessofDelphi. I've heard of making new pages/articles in the sand box but what is Wikipedia Articles for creation?? Thanks a lot!!!! [[User:Pythonessofdelphi|Pythonessofdelphi]] ([[User talk:Pythonessofdelphi|talk]]) 12:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
:::Articles for creation is a help feature of Wikipedia that makes it easy to find out if you should create your article (and how to create your article) by asking you a series of easy-to-answer questions. Click on [[WP:AfC|this link]], then click on the "Click here to create an article now!" button to get started! ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 00:16, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


Don't forget to save us all a piece of [[cake]]!
Dear Missionedit,<br>
This could possibly be my last question though I sincerely doubt it. How do you make the tabs like you had a button to make them on your talk page to make it organized.
Thanks again,<br>[[User:Pythonessofdelphi|Pythonessofdelphi]] ([[User talk:Pythonessofdelphi|talk]]) 00:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


|}
:{{ping|Pythonessofdelphi}} Can you rephrase that question? No comprendo ;) Also, if you want to indent your sentences and such, use a colon ( : ) instead of a bunch of spaces. This will make it look like you want. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 02:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


== New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022 ==
So the title of this message is Help and you can minimize the amount of space that it takes up. How do you do that???


Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
: Thanks once more
[[File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg|thumb|right|120px]]
: [[User:Pythonessofdelphi|Pythonessofdelphi]] ([[User talk:Pythonessofdelphi|talk]]) 00:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination/2022 WMF letter|open letter]] finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-09-30/In focus|current issue of ''The Signpost'']]. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.


'''Awards''': Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to {{Noping|MPGuy2824}}), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to {{no ping|John B123}} for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards|Awards page]]. Check out the new [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Awards#NPP_Hall_of_Fame|Hall of Fame]] also.
::{{ping|Pythonessofdelphi}} What? I'm sorry, but I don't understand. Please make your questions coherent if you want them answered. I'll start a new section at the bottom of this page to keep this one from getting too long. [[User talk:Missionedit#Yes? :)|Click here]] to get to it. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 04:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
'''Software news''': {{Noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{Noping|MPGuy2824}} have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently [[Wikipedia:Page_Curation/Suggested_improvements/Phab_tickets#Closed_tickets|here]]. The [[Wikipedia:Database_reports/Top_new_article_reviewers|reviewer report]] has also been improved.
[[File:2022-10-16 NPP backlog chart.jpg|thumb|450px|right|NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022]]
'''Suggestions''':
*There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
*Reminder: ''an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more.'' (from the [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol#Care|NPP tutorial]])
*Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
*This [[User:Lourdes/PageCuration|user script]] puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.


'''Backlog''':[[File:Everlasting Fireworks looped.gif|80px|left]] Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/October 2022|October backlog drive]] to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
:::Dear Missionedit,
{{-}}
:::I figured out my question on my own but now next question. I see all these people with projects. How do I get involved????? [[User:Pythonessofdelphi|Pythonessofdelphi]] ([[User talk:Pythonessofdelphi|talk]]) 01:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
{{refbegin}}
;Reminders
*Newsletter feedback - please take this [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Newsletter|short poll]] about the newsletter.
*If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Page Patrol Discord], where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
*Please add [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist.
*If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions|PERM]].
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]].
{{refend}}
<!-- Drafted by User:MB -->
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1114894896 -->


== New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023 ==
::::<big>HELLO PYTHONESSOFDELPHI!!!!!! I AM USING CAPS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONDING. I HAVE BEEN ASKING YOU TO PLEASE MAKE YOUR SENTENCES COMPLETE FOR A LONG TIME. IF YOU DON'T, I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU, AND I DON'T KNOW HOW TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS!!!! Thank you. '''I started a new section at the bottom of this page''' to keep this one from getting too long. '''[[User talk:Missionedit#Yes? :)|Click here]] to get to it.''' ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#to]]) 16:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)</big>


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
== User:Dedlen followup question ==
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
[[File:Npp backlog 2022-Dec.jpg|thumb|400px|New Page Review queue December 2022]]
;Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to {{noping|WaddlesJP13}} who led with 2084 points. See [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/October 2022|this page]] for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
;2022 Awards
[[File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg|74px|left]]
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Rosguill}} led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Awards|Awards page]] and the [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Awards#NPP_Hall_of_Fame|Hall of Fame]]. Congratulations everyone!


'''Minimum deletion time''': The previous [[WP:NPP]] guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and [[WP:BLAR]]). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the [[Special:NewPagesFeed|feed]] are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
I went ahead and used the submit button for my draft and followed the suggestion to move it to [[Draft:Dedlen]] for consideration. Is there a way for it to be assigned to you since you're already familiar with it? Thanks again for your help! [[User:Dedlen|Dedlen]] ([[User talk:Dedlen|talk]]) 14:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
:{{ping|Dedlen}} Well, editors usually "assign" themselves to articles of their choice. I would feel a little weird reviewing an article which I predicted would pass, if you know what I mean :) I'll see what I can do. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 21:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
::thank you. It was already reviewed! With 900+ I didn't expect that fast. So I tried to modify the phrases that were suggested I change. I'm waiting to find out the reviewer's thoughts. I really appreciate your help and hope to get the article eventually accepted! [[User:Dedlen|Dedlen]] ([[User talk:Dedlen|talk]]) 15:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
:::I made some changes and added some citations. It was suggested I contact the Teahouse again to check before submitting it again. Could you look and see what you think now? Thank you again! [[User:Dedlen|Dedlen]] ([[User talk:Dedlen|talk]]) 15:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Dedlen}} Prose looks a lot better! Good job improving it, I can understand the article much easier now. Also the extra sources help establish notability. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 03:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
:::::thank you! Terrific. So should I resubmit it do you think? [[User:Dedlen|Dedlen]] ([[User talk:Dedlen|talk]]) 04:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|Dedlen}} Yep. See what happens :) Good luck! ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 17:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
:::::::I resubmitted it. Is it typical for the same reviewer to review it again or does a different person usually do it? I really appreciated how fast the first one was but don't know the policies or common practices. [[User:Dedlen|Dedlen]] ([[User talk:Dedlen|talk]]) 11:08, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
{{ping|Dedlen}} 99% of the time a reviewer will not review the same article again, for many reasons. One of them is that there are so many different reviewers. Another is just preference. Unless you ask your reviewer (or any reviewer, see the [[WP:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants|reviewer list]]) to review it specifically, someone else will review it instead. FYI your article was only reviewed so quickly because I asked someone to do it :) ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 17:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
::I know :) thank you so much. I'll look at the list or just wait. It makes sense someone else should review it. Thanks again! [[User:Dedlen|Dedlen]] ([[User talk:Dedlen|talk]]) 19:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
:::after resubmitting I left a message for puffin hoping they might help review it. The number of pages needing review has jumped like 300 since then. Is there anything you can suggest? Thanks! [[User:Dedlen|Dedlen]] ([[User talk:Dedlen|talk]]) 07:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


'''New draftify script''': In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly [[Help:Unreviewed new page|explanation page]]. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your [[Special:MyPage/common.js|common.js]] or vector.js file from <code>User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js</code> to <code>User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js</code>'''
::::{{ping|Dedlen}} At this point, pretty much all you can do is wait. Wishing you all the patience in the world :) ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 19:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


'''Redirects''': Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirects|this guide]], [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol#Redirect_checklist|this checklist]], and spend some time at [[WP:RFD]].
== 01:02:45, 19 July 2014 review of submission by NileFlores ==
{{Lafc|username=NileFlores|ts=01:02:45, 19 July 2014|declined=Draft:Yoast}}


'''Discussions with the WMF''' The [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination/2022 WMF letter|PageTriage open letter]] signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted [[gerrit:q/repo:mediawiki/extensions/PageTriage+is:merged+NOT+author:Libraryupgrader+NOT+author:L10n-bot+before:2022-12-31|dozens of patches]] in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as {{noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{noping|MPGuy2824}} have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also [[Wikipedia talk:Growth Team features#Meeting details|had a video conference]] with the NPP coordinators to discuss [[User:Novem Linguae/Drafts/New landing page proposal|revamping the landing pages]] that new users see.


{{refbegin}}
[[User:NileFlores|NileFlores]] ([[User talk:NileFlores|talk]]) 01:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
;Reminders
*Newsletter feedback - please take this [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Newsletter|short poll]] about the newsletter.
*There is live chat with patrollers on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Page Patrol Discord].
*Please add [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist.
*If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions|PERM]].
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]].
{{refend}}
<!-- Drafted by User:MB, Reviewed by Novem Linguae, Kudpung -->
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1130464022 -->
</div>


== New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023 ==
== Question ==
Thanks for reviewing, but I have an honest question. I'd like to edit and submit for a re-review, but I'm a tad confused. Is not WordPress.org, Mashable, Matt Cutts, Go Daddy (yep- the web host, on their blog), and The Guardian not noteworthy enough? I've cited those sources. I mean, I could listed hundreds of URLs from lots of resources. WordPress Powers 20% of the entire Internet and this guy and his company is responsible for creating a SEO tool for WordPress (actually 2) that is well known all over the world. His plugin is referenced in SEOMoz, Neil Patel of QuickSprout and KissMetrics mention his plugin, WPBeginner, and much more. How much notable are you looking for? I don't want to sound rude, but I honestly need to know. :) [[User:NileFlores|NileFlores]] ([[User talk:NileFlores|talk]]) 01:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
:There's nothing rude about wanting to understand :) I apologize for not clarifying further! Notability is not determined by the number of sources. It depends on the quality of the sources, and how they are related to the subject. WordPress.org is definitely a huge corporation. However, sources from WordPress do not establish notability in this instance because Yoast is affiliated with WordPress. Same with ''The Guardian'', Yoast was paid to help them change their domain. See [[Wikipedia:Independent sources]] for more info.<br>
:The other sources, Mashable and Matt Cutts, are independent, but there is nothing more than a passing mention of Yoast in the articles cited. If you want to the establish notability of this company, '''independent''', '''reliable sources''' which give '''significant coverage''' of it are needed. See the [[Wikipedia:Golden rule]]. Does that answer all of your question? ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 02:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
==Talkback==
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per [[H:DL]], causes errors for screen readers -->
{{Tb|Talk:Solomon_ben_Jeroham#Copyright_problems}}
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
[[User:Debresser|Debresser]] ([[User talk:Debresser|talk]]) 22:41, 19 July 2014‎ (UTC)

== A kitten for you! ==

[[File:Kitten in a helmet.jpg|left|150px]]
Thanks for the approval about Soheir El-Qalamawy page :)

[[User:Bluemix|Bluemix]] ([[User talk:Bluemix|talk]]) 10:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>

:{{ping|Bluemix}} Awwww... so cute! Thanks :) ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 19:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

==Yes? :)==

Pythonessofdelphi, Please continue your questions here. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 04:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
:<big>As an answer to your question about [[WP:WikiProjects|WikiProjects]], you can get involved with any WikiProject you want by adding yourself to the member list of that WikiProject and reading their homepage to see what they need help with. To find a WikiProject you're interested in, go to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory]] page and look around. Or, I can help you find some, if you like. What are you interested in? ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 16:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)</big>

::Dear Missionedit,
::I am interested in Greek, Egyptian, and Roman Mythology and the Texas Revolution.
::Thanks!!![[User:Pythonessofdelphi|Pythonessofdelphi]] ([[User talk:Pythonessofdelphi|talk]]) 00:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Pythonessofdelphi}} [[WP:WikiProject Mythology|Wikipedia:WikiProject Mythology]] and perhaps [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas|WikiProject Texas]] or [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history|WikiProject Military history]] might be of interest to you, then. Check them out and see what you think! Thanks for making an effort to make your grammar easier to understand :) Sorry for yelling at you earlier, I just needed to get your attention. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 16:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

== Auto duplicate page creation for 1 topic ==

Hi,

I created a page named LensKart. In first attempt it got live with removing 90% content and when i edited new content and updated. The updated content got approved but it created a new page with new URL.

Old page-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenskart
New page- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LensKart

I updated fresh content on old page which got approved but it got live with separate new page.

I want https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LensKart page live and remove this one- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenskart


Regards,
AJ <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ajayrwat|Ajayrwat]] ([[User talk:Ajayrwat|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ajayrwat|contribs]]) 14:07, 1 August 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Oh. I didn't realize that there was another live LensKart page when I approved your new draft. Stupid of me. Easy fix, though--I'll just redirect Lenskart to LensKart we'll be all set. Don't forget to sign your comments :) ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 17:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
:I decided to move the new [[Lenskart]] content under the title of the old one, and redirect the new title to the old one. Kind of confusing to explain, so take a look for yourself. The reason I did this is because all the sources you cited refer to the company as Lenskart, not Lenskart, make this the widely accepted spelling by anyone who looks it up. See [[WP:COMMONNAME]] for more info. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 17:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

== 03:47:36, 2 August 2014 review of submission by Bodrad ==
{{Lafc|username=Bodrad|ts=03:47:36, 2 August 2014|declinedtalk=User_talk:Bodrad}}


Thank you kindly for the very quick review and response to my draft submission. I think I understand your concerns and the changes required. I have attempted to address each of your suggestions, and also have a clarifying question. Again, I appreciate your assistance with this process and I hope that these changes are along the lines of what is necessary to publish this article.

===Clarifying Question===
You stated that I need to "improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable...". I am a bit unclear as to the best way to address this concern. Shall I include more references and citations? Or do I simply need to place the ones I already have more frequently throughout the article's sentences rather than at the end of paragraphs as I have done?

===Addressing Notability===
It seems to me the biggest issue with the article in its current form (and I do plan to flesh out the other sections more fully in the next weeks), is its notability. I have reviewed the Golden Rule and musician notability guidelines that you were very helpful in passing along.

====Golden Rule====
''Significant Coverage''
I've included over 15 unrelated and independent references from sources including newspapers, magazine articles, well-known music corporations (e.g., ProMark and Zildjian), other musicians' websites, and online music stores. Nearly all of these discuss the topic directly and in detail. I understand these may not be enough, and I actually have other print sources that I have not yet had a chance to include as I was saving them for additions to the topic. I've listed these below to hopefully bolster the significant coverage requirement:
*Modern Drummer is the premier magazine/news source for professional drummers of all musical styles. One of my currently referenced articles is available online<ref>http://www.scribd.com/doc/184200690/Modern-Drummer-051</ref> - the others I only have in print form at the moment.
**[[Modern Drummer]] - March 2000
**Modern Drummer - September 1999
**Modern Drummer - January 1984
*German Jazz Magazines
**Jazzpodium <ref>http://www.jazzpodium.de</ref>- June 1999
**Jazzpodium - July 1982
**Jazzthetik <ref>http://www.jazzthetik.de</ref>- June 1999
**Jazzthing <ref>http://www.jazzthing.de</ref>- April-May 1999
**Drums and Percussion Magazine <ref>http://www.drumsundpercussion.de</ref>- June 1982
*German National Newspapers
**[[Die Welt]] <ref>http://www.welt.de</ref>- February 25, 1999
**[[Berliner Morgenpost]] <ref>http://www.moregenpost.de</ref>- February 23, 19992/23/99
*US Radio Stations and Newspapers
**WPRK/FM, Orlando - November 23, 1997
**[[Orlando Sentinel]], Orlando <ref>http://www.orlandosentinel.com</ref> - November, 1997
**WLRN Radio, Miami - October, 1997
**KDSU/FM, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota - September, 1997
**WUSB/FM, SUNY Stonybrook, New York - September 11, 1997
**[[Sun Sentinel]], Fort Lauderdale <ref>http://www.sun-sentinel.com</ref>- February, 1993

''Reliable Sources''
As mentioned on the Golden Rule page, these sources are newspapers, periodicals, and media stations, which fall under example categories of reliable sources. Please let me know if those listed above and those referenced in the current article are not up to standards.

''Independent Sources''
All of the articles referenced and those listed above were generated by independent authors or interviewers. None were paid advertisements or otherwise arranged by the topic.

''Verifiability''
I am a bit confused by the statement listed: "Non-independent reliable sources can be used for verifiability". Either way, I hope the sources I've already used and those listed above are considered verifiable. The answer to my question above will help me understand more clearly how often sources should be included/referenced.

===Notability===

*''Multiple, non-trivial, published works in all forms''
It is my contention that the listing above and those already referenced fall under this category.
*''Non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country''
The interviews and articles listed above cover this topic regarding several major festivals Abbey performed at in Europe

*''Two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels''
Two of Abbey's albums were released by [[Cadence Jazz Records]], which contains notable musicians and is a leading label for independent jazz music.

*''Musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles''
Abbey played for John Handy and Mal Waldron in several ensembles during the 70s and 80s, both independently highly notable jazz musicians.

*''Prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city''
Abbey Rader is the one of the only, perhaps the only, musician playing this style of music in South Florida. There are several newspaper articles and online mentions of his work in Miami that allude to this, many of which I have already referenced. However, I have found another: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/crossfade/2011/08/abbey_rader_john_mcminn_pax_miami_august_24_2011.php

[[User:Bodrad|Bodrad]] ([[User talk:Bodrad|talk]]) 03:47, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

{{reflist}}

:I'll continue this discussion on your talk page. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 18:55, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

{{Talkback|Bodrad}}

==Fundación Aladina==
Hi, I´m working on the translation for a new page on the Fundación Aladina, I´m working on the spanish article and decided to translate it. Could you help me out checking the links? They told me the format is ok, but that the reviewer couldn't check the links because some are in spanish. Thanks.--[[User:FMateos|FMateos]] ([[User talk:FMateos|talk]]) 09:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
:I'd love to be of service :) Where is it, exactly? ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 14:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
::Its in my sandbox, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FMateos/sandbox thanks--[[User:FMateos|FMateos]] ([[User talk:FMateos|talk]]) 07:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
:::{{ping|FMateos}} {{done}} - Who was the reviewer? I checked the links, and I believe that you may need a few more sources to establish notability. Nice job translating :) One suggestion--the "See also" section is only for links to Wikipedia articles, not links to other websites, which belong in the "External links" section. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 14:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

== Reverting at your talk page ==

I usually only revert really nasty stuff at others' talks, but I went ahead this time. I hope that was okay. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 12:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

== Thanks for the welcome -- now what? ==

Hi // Thanks for the teashop welcome! I'd love to get started as a wikipedia editor, but I'm not really sure the best way to get going. There are certainly topics I know about, but it's not clear to me the best place to get going. Are there lists of tasks that I can work through, preferably starting with fairly minor copyediting or other straightforward activities while I get the hang of it? Thanks!
[[User:Breandank|Breandank]] ([[User talk:Breandank|talk]]) 09:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

:Hello Breandank! I'm so glad that you are enthusiastic about editing Wikipedia! If you want to find some minor jobs to do, there are plenty that need to be done. The [[Wikipedia: Typo Team|Wikipedia Typo Team]] is a [[WP:WikiProject|WikiProject]] dedicated to--you guessed it--correcting typos. This is a great place get started, so take look at the page to see how you can help. Also, if you are really serious about learning how to help out Wikipedia, [[WP:Adopt-a-user|Adopt-a-user]] is a program in which an experienced Wikipedia editor mentors you, giving a big intro in to many areas of the WikiWorld :) This mentorship lasts awhile, though, so prepared to be committed. That's all that comes to mind right now, but if I think of anything else, I'll contact you. Thanks again! ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 17:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
:Another page you might be interested in: [[Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask]]. [[User:Benzband|<span style="color: green">benzband</span>]] ([[User talk:Benzband#|<span style="color: black">talk</span>]]) 18:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

== [[User:DURYODANAN|DURYODANAN]] ==
I KNOW YOU! ANATASIA. I HOPE THE SPELLING IS RIGHT MISSIONEDIT. DON'T YOU REMEMBER ME? LAST TIME YOU TRIED TO HELP ME. BUT IT WAS A FAILURE. AFTER THAT I DELETED MY ACCOUNT. WHEN I RECREATED IT I WAS SEARCHING FOR YOU MY DEAR FRIEND. AT LAST I FOUND YOU AT TEA HOUSE. HAPPY TO MEET YOU AGAIN.
NOW I'M IN TROUBLE. COULD YOU PLS HELP ME BY ANSWERING A TRICKY QUESTION.IN THE LAND OF THE BLIND, THE ONE-EYED MAN IS THE KING. WHO IS THIS OR WHAT IS THIS?
I HOPE YOU WILL HELP ME.
I HAVE A LOT TO SAY TO YOU. BUT NO TIME. BYE BYE.
HERE ARE SOME GIFTS FOR YOU.[[User:DURYODANAN|DURYODANAN]] ([[User talk:DURYODANAN|talk]]) 14:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Kindness Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | HAI MY FRIEND!!!!!!!!!!! [[User:DURYODANAN|DURYODANAN]] ([[User talk:DURYODANAN|talk]]) 14:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
|}
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
{| style="float: right;
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Choco_chip_cookie.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''MY GIFT FOR YOU'''
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I HOPE YOU ARE HAPPY [[User:DURYODANAN|DURYODANAN]] ([[User talk:DURYODANAN|talk]]) 14:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
|}
|}
[[File:NPP April-June 2023 backlog.svg|thumb|400px|New Page Review queue April to June 2023]]
'''Backlog'''


'''Redirect drive''': In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with '''23851''' reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to '''0''' (momentarily). Congratulations to {{Noping|Hey man im josh}} who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by {{noping|Meena}} and {{noping|Greyzxq}} with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2023|this page]] for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
:Hello again, DURYODANAN! Nice to see you, too. I have a few things to say:
*Please to do not type with the Caps Lock on all the time. This is equivalent to yelling in computer etiquette, and is extremely rude and annoying to many people.
*Thank you for your gifts and encouragement :) However, one or two barnstars/kittens/cookies is plenty, no need to give any more to me.
*What do you need your question answered for? Something Wikipedia related, or something for school? If it's something for school, then I'm not really supposed to help with that. Talk pages are for Wikipedia related work only. If you have a homework question, than feel free to ask it at the [[Wikipedia:Reference desk]].

== 14:42:50, 11 August 2014 review of submission by Salmaawakening ==
{{Lafc|username=Salmaawakening|ts=14:42:50, 11 August 2014|declined=Draft:Harris_J}}

I need to understand a small point. Is it rejected because the subject is not notable, or because there is not enough references that he is?

[[User:Salmaawakening|Salmaawakening]] ([[User talk:Salmaawakening|talk]]) 14:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

:Because there are not enough references. If you can find more independent, reliable sources, this would help establish his notability. ~ [[User:Missionedit|Anastasia ]] ([[User talk:Missionedit#top|talk]]) 17:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


'''Redirect autopatrol''': All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list#Requests|here]].


'''WMF work on PageTriage''': The [[mw:Moderator Tools|WMF Moderator Tools team]], consisting of {{noping|Samwalton9 (WMF)|label1=Sam|JSherman (WMF)|label2=Jason|SCardenas (WMF)|label3=Susana}}, and also some patches from {{noping|Jon (WMF)|label1=Jon}}, has been hard at work [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/2023 Moderator Tools project|updating PageTriage]]. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in [[beta test]] where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of [[Special:NewPagesFeed]], to help find bugs. We will post more details at [[WT:NPPR]] when we are ready for beta testers.


'''Articles for Creation (AFC)''': All new page reviewers are now '''automatically approved''' for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at [[WT:AFCP]] like was required previously). To install the [[WP:AFCH|AFC helper script]], visit [[Special:Preferences]], visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit [[Special:NewPagesFeed]], and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.


You can review the AFC workflow at [[WP:AFCR]]. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that [[WP:DRAFTOBJECT|draftspace is optional]], so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.


'''Pro tip''': Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own [[WP:SNG|SNG]]? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is [[WP:ARTIST]] 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).


{{refbegin}}
Thank you for your suggestions.
'''Reminders'''
Why did you say that you know me?
*Newsletter feedback - please take this [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Newsletter|short poll]] about the newsletter.
It's a lie.
*There is live chat with patrollers on the [https://discordapp.com/invite/heF3xPu New Page Patrol Discord] and {{IRC|wikimedia-npp}} on IRC.
I know you and you know me but you know me with a different name.
*Please add [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers|the project discussion page]] to your watchlist.
Do you remember what was my old name?
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]].
I have one doubt.
{{refend}}
How can we change our username on Wikipedia?
</div>
How can I find my friends who are in Wikipedia?
<!-- Drafted by Novem Linguae, MPGuy2824 and Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. -->
I am a school girl.
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 -->
I am from Kerala,India.
I know Malayalam,English,Spanish,Russian,Tamil and Kannada.
Are these qualities enough to qualify me as your friend?
Bye, my dear friend. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DURYODANAN|DURYODANAN]] ([[User talk:DURYODANAN|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DURYODANAN|contribs]]) 12:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 19:49, 22 December 2024

If you return to editing, please remove the above template.

User Talk Page
Contributions
Sign my Guestbook
Adoption HQ
My Bookmarks
leftlink=Special:PrefixIndex/User:Missionedit
leftlink=Special:PrefixIndex/User:Missionedit
Subpages List

WooHoo!

[edit]
Happy Birthday from the Birthday Committee

Wishing Missionedit a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

[edit]

Hello Missionedit,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

[edit]

Hello Missionedit,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

[edit]

Hello Missionedit,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders