Audit: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Management cybernetics | #UCB_Category 10/234 |
|||
(331 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Independent examination of an organization}} |
|||
{{Other uses}} |
|||
{{hatnote group| |
|||
{{Redirect|Auditing|the Scientology practise|Auditing (Scientology)}} |
|||
{{other uses}}{{redirect|Auditing|the Scientology practice|Auditing (Scientology)}}{{redirect|Paper trail|the T.I. album|Paper Trail|the video game|Paper Trail (video game){{!}}''Paper Trail'' (video game)}} |
|||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
{{refimprove|date=October 2010}} |
|||
{{globalize|date=January 2010}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Accounting}} |
|||
[[File:Audit Cycle.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Some typical stages in the audit process]] |
[[File:Audit Cycle.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Some typical stages in the audit process]] |
||
'''Auditing''' refers to a systematic and independent examination of books, accounts, documents and vouchers of an organization to ascertain how far the financial statements present a true and fair view of the concern. It also attempts to ensure that the books of accounts are properly maintained by the concern as required by law. Auditing has become such an ubiquitous phenomenon in the corporate and the public sector that academics started identifying an "Audit Society".<ref>Power, Michael. 1999. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</ref> |
|||
The auditor perceives and recognizes the propositions before him/her for examination, obtains evidence, evaluates the same and formulates an opinion on the basis of his judgement which is communicated through his audit report.<ref>{{cite web|title=Audit assurance|url=http://www.icai.org/post.html?post_id=6193}}</ref> |
|||
An '''audit''' is an "independent examination of financial information of any entity, whether profit oriented or not, irrespective of its size or legal form when such an examination is conducted with a view to express an opinion thereon."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gupta|first1=Kamal|title=Contemporary Auditing|date=November 2004|publisher=McGraw Hill|isbn=0070585849|page=1095}}</ref> '''Auditing''' also attempts to ensure that the books of accounts are properly maintained by the concern as required by law. Auditors consider the propositions before them, obtain evidence, roll forward prior year working papers, and evaluate the propositions in their auditing report.<ref>{{cite web|title= Audit assurance|url= http://www.icai.org/post.html?post_id=6193}}</ref> |
|||
Any subject matter may be audited. Audits provide third party assurance to various [[stakeholder (corporate)|stakeholder]]s that the subject matter is free from [[Materiality (auditing)|material]] misstatement. The term is most frequently applied to audits of the financial information relating to a [[legal person]]. Other areas which are commonly audited include: internal controls, quality management, project management, water management, and energy conservation. |
|||
Audits provide third-party assurance to various [[stakeholder (corporate)|stakeholder]]s that the subject matter is free from [[Materiality (auditing)|material]] misstatement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=PricewaterhouseCoopers |title=What is an audit? |url=https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/services/assurance/what-is-an-audit.html |access-date=2022-03-03 |website=PwC}}</ref> The term is most frequently applied to audits of the financial information relating to a [[legal person]]. Other commonly audited areas include: secretarial and compliance, internal controls, quality management, project management, water management, and energy conservation. As a result of an audit, stakeholders may evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance over the subject matter. |
|||
As a result of an audit, stakeholders may effectively evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and the governance process over the subject matter. |
|||
In recent years auditing has expanded to encompass many areas of public and corporate life. Professor [[Michael Power (accountant)|Michael Power]] refers to this extension of auditing practices as the "Audit Society".<ref>Power, Michael (1999), ''The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification''. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</ref> |
|||
The word audit is derived from a Latin word "audire" which means "to hear".<ref>{{cite web|title=Evolution of auditing|url=http://www.davidpublishing.com/Upfile/12/2/2012/2012120283233169.pdf|publisher=David Publishing}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Assurance|first1=Auditing and|publisher=Institute of Chartered Accountants of India|location=Chapter 1, Volume 1|page=1|url=http://www.icai.org/post.html?post_id=6193}}</ref> During the medieval times when manual book-keeping was prevalent, auditors in Britain used to hear the accounts read out for them and checked that the organization's personnel were not negligent or fraudulent.<ref>{{cite book|first1=History of Auditing|author1=Derek Matthews|title=The changing audit process from the 19th century till date|publisher=Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group|page=6|url=https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ONR8AgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=history+of+auditing&ots=ah8n0IGcZS&sig=fD_9P6fpkh-W8CFn0HOwCjHk4mo#v=onepage&q=medieval&f=false}}</ref> |
|||
== |
== Etymology == |
||
The word "audit" derives from the Latin word ''audire'' which means "to hear".<ref>{{cite book|last1= Assurance|first1= Auditing and|publisher= Institute of Chartered Accountants of India|title= ICAI - The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India|chapter=Chapter 1 |volume=1 |page=1|url=http://www.icai.org/post.html?post_id=6193}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Financial audit}} |
|||
Due to strong incentives (including [[taxation]], [[misselling]] and other forms of fraud) to misstate financial information, auditing has become a legal requirement for many entities who have the power to exploit financial information for personal gain. Traditionally, audits were mainly associated with gaining information about financial systems and the financial records of a company or a business. |
|||
== History == |
|||
Financial audits are performed to ascertain the [[Validity (statistics)|validity]] and [[Reliability (statistics)|reliability]] of information, as well as to provide an [[:wikt:assessment|assessment]] of a system's [[internal control]]. As a result of this, a third party can express an opinion of the person / organization / system (etc.) in question. The opinion given on financial statements will depends on the [[audit evidence]] obtained. |
|||
Auditing has been a safeguard measure since ancient times.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1= Loeb|first1= Stephen E.|last2= Shamoo|first2= Adil E.|date= 1989-09-01|title= Data audit: Its place in auditing|journal= Accountability in Research|volume= 1|issue= 1|pages= 23–32|doi= 10.1080/08989628908573771|issn= 0898-9621|pmid= 26859053}}</ref> During medieval times, when manual bookkeeping was prevalent, auditors in Britain used to hear the accounts read out for them and checked that the organization's personnel were not negligent or fraudulent.<ref>{{cite book|first1=History of Auditing|last1=Derek Matthews|title= The changing audit process from the 19th century till date|publisher=Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group|page=6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ONR8AgAAQBAJ&q=history+of+auditing&pg=PP1|isbn=9781134177912|date=2006-09-27}}</ref> In 1951, Moyer identified that the most important duty of the auditor was to detect fraud.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=C. A.|first=Moyer|date=January 1951|title=Early Developments in American Auditing|jstor=239850|journal=Accounting Review|volume=26|issue=1|pages=3–8}}</ref> Chatfield documented that early United States auditing was viewed mainly as verification of bookkeeping detail.<ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.2307/3113713 | jstor=3113713 | last1=Johnson | first1=H. Thomas | title=Reviewed work: A History of Accounting Thought, Michael Chatfield | journal=The Business History Review | year=1975 | volume=49 | issue=2 | pages=256–257 | s2cid=154953655 }}</ref> |
|||
The [[Central Auditing Commission of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union]] ({{langx |ru| Центральная ревизионная комиссия КПСС}}) operated from 1921 to 1990. |
|||
Due to constraints, an audit seeks to provide only '''reasonable assurance''' that the statements are free from [[Materiality (auditing)|material]] error. Hence, statistical sampling is often adopted in audits. In the case of [[financial audit]]s, a set of [[financial statements]] are said to be true and fair when they are free of material misstatements – a concept influenced by both [[Numerical data|quantitative]] (numerical) and [[qualitative data|qualitative]] factors. But recently, the argument that auditing should go beyond just [[true and fair]] is gaining momentum.<ref>{{cite news|title=Auditors and Audit Reports: Is The Firm's "John Hancock" Enough?|url=http://blogs.forbes.com/francinemckenna/2011/07/08/auditors-and-audit-reports-is-the-firms-john-hancock-enough/|accessdate=22 July 2011 | work=Forbes|first=Francine|last=McKenna}}</ref> And the US [[Public Company Accounting Oversight Board]] has come out with a concept release on the same.<ref>{{cite web|title=CONCEPT RELEASE ON POSSIBLE REVISIONS TO PCAOB STANDARDS RELATED TO REPORTS ON AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |url=http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket034/Concept_Release.pdf|accessdate=22 July 2011}}</ref> |
|||
==Information technology audit== |
|||
[[Cost accounting]] is a process for verifying the cost of manufacturing or producing of any article, on the basis of accounts measuring the use of material, labor or other items of cost. In simple words, the term, ''[[Cost Auditing|cost audit]]'' means a systematic and accurate verification of the cost accounts and records, and checking for adherence to the cost accounting objectives. According to the Institute of Cost and [[Management Accountant]]s of Pakistan, a [[Cost Auditing|cost audit]] is "an examination of cost accounting records and verification of facts to ascertain that the cost of the product has been arrived at, in accordance with principles of cost accounting."{{Citation needed|date=December 2012}} |
|||
{{Main|Information technology audit}} {{See also|Software audit review}} |
|||
An '''information technology audit''', or '''information systems audit''', is an examination of the management controls within an [[Information technology]] (IT) [[infrastructure]]. The evaluation of obtained evidence determines if the information systems are safeguarding assets, maintaining [[data integrity]], and operating effectively to achieve the organization's goals or objectives. These reviews may be performed in conjunction with a [[Financial audit|financial statement audit]], [[internal audit]], or other form of attestation engagement. |
|||
In most nations, an audit must adhere to generally accepted standards established by governing bodies. These standards assure third parties or external users that they can rely upon the auditor's opinion on the fairness of financial statements, or other subjects on which the auditor expresses an opinion. |
|||
==Accounting== |
|||
===Integrated audits=== |
|||
{{See also|Financial audit|Internal control}} |
|||
In US audits of [[publicly traded]] companies are governed by rules laid down by the [[Public Company Accounting Oversight Board]] (PCAOB), which was established by Section 404 of the [[Sarbanes–Oxley Act]] of 2002. Such an audit is called an integrated audit, where auditors, in addition to an opinion on the financial statements, must also express an opinion on the ''effectiveness'' of a company's ''internal control'' over financial reporting, in accordance with PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5.{{Citation needed|date=December 2012}} |
|||
Due to strong incentives (including [[taxation]], [[misselling]] and other forms of fraud) to misstate financial information, auditing has become a legal requirement for many entities who have the power to exploit financial information for personal gain. Traditionally, audits were mainly associated with gaining information about financial systems and the financial records of a company or a business. Financial audits also assess whether a business or corporation adheres to legal duties as well as other applicable statutory customs and regulations.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Environmental regulations and incentives for compliance audits |date=1997 |doi=10.1016/S0278-4254(97)00003-3 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278425497000033 |access-date=1 April 2023 |last1=Mishra |first1=Birendra K. |last2=Paul Newman |first2=D. |last3=Stinson |first3=Christopher H. |journal=Journal of Accounting and Public Policy |volume=16 |issue=2 |pages=187–214 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=The relevance of compliance audit on companies' compliance with disclosure guidelines of financial statements |year=2021 |url=https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOIC-12-2020-0047/full/html |publisher=Emerald Insight |doi=10.1108/JOIC-12-2020-0047 |access-date=1 April 2023 |last1=Thottoli |first1=Mohammed Muneerali |journal=Journal of Investment Compliance |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=137–150 |s2cid=236598426 }}</ref> |
|||
There are also new types of integrated auditing becoming available that use unified compliance material (see the unified compliance section in [[Regulatory compliance]]). Due to the increasing number of regulations and need for operational transparency, organizations are adopting [[risk-based audit]]s that can cover multiple regulations and standards from a single audit event.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} This is a very new but necessary approach in some sectors to ensure that all the necessary [[governance]] requirements can be met without duplicating effort from both audit and audit hosting resources.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} |
|||
Financial audits are performed to ascertain the [[Validity (statistics)|validity]] and [[Reliability (statistics)|reliability]] of information, as well as to provide an [[:wikt:assessment|assessment]] of a system's [[internal control]]. As a result, a third party can express an opinion of the person / organization / system (etc.) in question. The opinion given on financial statements will depend on the [[audit evidence]] obtained. |
|||
===Assessments=== |
|||
The purpose of an assessment is to measure something or calculate a value for it. Although the process of producing an assessment may involve an audit by an independent professional, its purpose is to provide a measurement rather than to express an opinion about the fairness of statements or quality of performance.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Ladda|first1=R.L.|title=Basic Concepts Of Accounting|publisher=Laxmi Book Publication|location=Solapur|isbn=978-1-312-16130-6|page=58}}</ref> |
|||
A statutory audit is a legally required review of the accuracy of a company's or government's financial statements and records. The purpose of a statutory audit is to determine whether an organization provides a fair and accurate representation of its financial position by examining information such as bank balances, bookkeeping records, and financial transactions. |
|||
===Auditors=== |
|||
Auditors of financial statements can be classified into two categories: |
|||
Due to constraints, an audit seeks to provide only '''reasonable assurance''' that the statements are free from [[Materiality (auditing)|material]] error. Hence, statistical sampling is often adopted in audits. In the case of [[financial audit]]s, a set of [[financial statements]] are said to be true and fair when they are free of material misstatements – a concept influenced by both [[Numerical data|quantitative]] (numerical) and [[qualitative data|qualitative]] factors. But recently, the argument that auditing should go beyond just true and fair is gaining momentum.<ref>{{cite news|title=Auditors and Audit Reports: Is The Firm's "John Hancock" Enough?|url=https://blogs.forbes.com/francinemckenna/2011/07/08/auditors-and-audit-reports-is-the-firms-john-hancock-enough/|access-date=22 July 2011 | work=Forbes|first=Francine|last=McKenna}}</ref> And the US [[Public Company Accounting Oversight Board]] has come out with a concept release on the same.<ref>{{cite web|title=CONCEPT RELEASE ON POSSIBLE REVISIONS TO PCAOB STANDARDS RELATED TO REPORTS ON AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |url=http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket034/Concept_Release.pdf|access-date=22 July 2011}}</ref> |
|||
*[[External auditor]] / [[Statutory auditor]] is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the audit, to express an opinion on whether the company's [[financial statements]] are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. For [[publicly traded companies]], external auditors may also be required to express an opinion over the effectiveness of [[internal controls]] over [[financial reporting]]. External auditors may also be engaged to perform other agreed-upon procedures, related or unrelated to financial statements. Most importantly, external auditors, though engaged and paid by the company being audited, should be regarded as independent. |
|||
[[Cost accounting]] is a process for verifying the cost of manufacturing or producing of any article, on the basis of accounts measuring the use of material, labor or other items of cost. In simple words, the term, ''[[Cost auditing|cost audit]]'' means a systematic and accurate verification of the cost accounts and records, and checking for adherence to the cost accounting objectives. According to the Institute of Cost and [[Management Accountant]]s, [[Cost auditing|cost audit]] is "an examination of cost accounting records and verification of facts to ascertain that the cost of the product has been arrived at, in accordance with principles of cost accounting."{{Citation needed|date=December 2012|reason=|cost auditing=}} |
|||
*[[Cost auditor]] / [[Statutory Cost auditor]] is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the Cost audit, to express an opinion on whether the company's [[Cost statements and Cost Sheet]] are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. For [[publicly traded companies]], external auditors may also be required to express an opinion over the effectiveness of [[internal controls]] over [[Cost reporting]]. These are Specialized Persons called Cost Accountants in India & CMA globally either Cost & Management Accountants or Certified Management Accountants. {{Further|Cost auditing}} |
|||
In most nations, an audit must adhere to generally accepted standards established by governing bodies. These standards assure third parties or external users that they can rely upon the auditor's opinion on the fairness of financial statements or other subjects on which the auditor expresses an opinion. The audit must therefore be precise and accurate, containing no additional misstatements or errors.{{Citation needed|date=April 2023}} |
|||
The most commonly used external audit standards are the US [[GAAS]] of the [[American Institute of Certified Public Accountants]]; and the ISA [[International Standards on Auditing]] developed by the [[International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board]] of the [[International Federation of Accountants]].{{Citation needed|date=December 2012}} |
|||
===Integrated audits=== |
|||
*[[Internal auditor]]s are employed by the organizations they audit. They work for government agencies (federal, state and local); for publicly traded companies; and for non-profit companies across all industries. The internationally recognised standard setting body for the profession is the Institute of Internal Auditors - IIA (www.theiia.org). The IIA has defined internal auditing as follows: "Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/mandatory-guidance/Pages/Definition-of-Internal-Auditing.aspx |title=Pages - Definition of Internal Auditing |publisher=Na.theiia.org |date=2000-01-01 |accessdate=2013-09-02}}</ref> Thus professional internal auditors provide independent and objective audit and consulting services focused on evaluating whether the board of directors, shareholders, stakeholders, and corporate executives have reasonable assurance that the organization's governance, risk management, and control processes are designed adequately and function effectively. Internal audit professionals (Certified Internal Auditors - CIAs) are governed by the international professional standards and code of conduct of the Institute of Internal Auditors.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/Pages/Standards-and-Guidance-IPPF.aspx |title=Pages - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) |publisher=Na.theiia.org |date=2000-01-01 |accessdate=2013-09-02}}</ref> While internal auditors are not independent of the companies that employ them, independence and objectivity are a cornerstone of the IIA professional standards; and are discussed at length in the standards and the supporting practice guides and practice advisories. Professional internal auditors are mandated by the IIA standards to be independent of the business activities they audit. This independence and objectivity are achieved through the organizational placement and reporting lines of the internal audit department. Internal auditors of publicly traded companies in the United States are required to report functionally to the board of directors directly, or a sub-committee of the board of directors (typically the audit committee), and not to management except for administrative purposes. As described often in the professional literature for the practice of internal auditing (such as Internal Auditor, the journal of the IIA) -,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://na.theiia.org/periodicals/Pages/Internal-Auditor-Magazine.aspx |title=Professional internal auditors, in carrying out their responsibilities, apply COSO's Integrated Framework-Internal Control |publisher=Theiia.org}}</ref> or other similar and generally recognized frameworks for management control when evaluating an entity's governance and control practices; and apply COSO's "Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework" or other similar and generally recognized frameworks for entity-wide risk management when evaluating an organization's entity-wide risk management practices. Professional internal auditors also use Control Self-Assessment (CSA) as an effective process for performing their work. |
|||
In the US, audits of [[publicly traded]] companies are governed by rules laid down by the [[Public Company Accounting Oversight Board]] (PCAOB), which was established by Section 404 of the [[Sarbanes–Oxley Act]] of 2002. Such an audit is called an integrated audit, where auditors, in addition to an opinion on the financial statements, must also express an opinion on the ''effectiveness'' of a company's ''internal control'' over financial reporting, in accordance with PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/pages/auditing_standard_5.aspx|title=Auditing Standard No. 5|website=pcaobus.org|access-date=2016-06-28}}</ref> |
|||
There are also new types of integrated auditing becoming available that use unified compliance material (see the unified compliance section in [[Regulatory compliance]]). Due to the increasing number of regulations and need for operational transparency, organizations are adopting [[risk-based audit]]s that can cover multiple regulations and standards from a single audit event.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} This is a very new but necessary approach in some sectors to ensure that all the necessary [[governance]] requirements can be met without duplicating effort from both audit and audit hosting resources.{{Citation needed|date=January 2011}} |
|||
===Assessments=== |
|||
The purpose of an assessment is to measure something or calculate a value for it. An auditor's objective is to determine whether financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, and are free of material misstatement. Although the process of producing an assessment may involve an audit by an independent professional, its purpose is to provide a measurement rather than to express an opinion about the fairness of statements or quality of performance.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Ladda|first1=R.L.|title=Basic Concepts Of Accounting|publisher=Laxmi Book Publication|location=Solapur|isbn=978-1-312-16130-6|page=58}}</ref> |
|||
===Auditors=== |
|||
Auditors of financial statements & non-financial information (including compliance audit) can be classified into various categories: |
|||
*[[External auditor]]/[[Statutory auditor]] is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the audit to express an opinion on whether the company's [[financial statements]] are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. For [[publicly traded companies]], external auditors may also be required to express an opinion on the effectiveness of [[internal controls]] over [[financial reporting]]. External auditors may also be engaged to perform other agreed-upon procedures, related or unrelated to financial statements. Most importantly, external auditors, though engaged and paid by the company being audited, should be regarded as independent and remain third party.{{Citation needed|date=December 2015}} |
|||
*Consultant auditors are external personnel contracted by the firm to perform an audit following the firm's [[Auditing Standards Board|auditing standards]]. This differs from the [[external auditor]], who follows their own auditing standards. The level of independence is therefore somewhere between the internal auditor and the external auditor. The consultant auditor may work independently, or as part of the audit team that includes internal auditors. Consultant auditors are used when the firm lacks sufficient expertise to audit certain areas, or simply for staff augmentation when staff are not available. |
|||
*[[Cost auditor]]/Statutory cost auditor is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the cost audit to express an opinion on whether the company's [[cost accounting|cost statements and cost sheet]] are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. For [[publicly traded companies]], external auditors may also be required to express an opinion on the effectiveness of [[internal controls]] over cost reporting. These are Specialized Persons called Cost Accountants in India & CMA globally either Cost & Management Accountants or Certified Management Accountants. |
|||
*Government Auditors review the finances and practices of federal agencies. These auditors report their finds to congress, which uses them to create and manage policies and budgets. Government auditors work for the U.S. Government Accountability Office, and most state governments have similar departments to audit state and municipal agencies. |
|||
*Secretarial [[auditor]]/Statutory secretarial auditor is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the audit of secretarial and applicable laws/compliances of other applicable laws to express an opinion on whether the company's [[company secretary|secretarial records]] and [[regulatory compliance|compliance of applicable laws]] are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error and inviting heavy fines or penalties. For [[list of public corporations by market capitalization|bigger public companies]], external secretarial auditors may also be required to express an opinion on the effectiveness of [[internal controls]] over compliances system management of the company. These are Specialized Persons called Company Secretaries in India who are the members of Institute of Company Secretaries of India and holding Certificate of Practice. (http://www.icsi.edu/) |
|||
*[[Internal auditor]]s are employed by the organizations they audit. They work for government agencies (federal, state and local); for publicly traded companies; and for non-profit companies across all industries. The internationally recognized standard setting body for the profession is the Institute of Internal Auditors - IIA (www.theiia.org). The IIA has defined internal auditing as follows: "Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/mandatory-guidance/Pages/Definition-of-Internal-Auditing.aspx |title=Pages - Definition of Internal Auditing |publisher=Na.theiia.org |date=2000-01-01 |access-date=2013-09-02}}</ref> Thus professional internal auditors provide independent and objective audit and consulting services focused on evaluating whether the board of directors, shareholders, stakeholders, and corporate executives have reasonable assurance that the organization's governance, risk management, and control processes are designed adequately and function effectively. Internal audit professionals ([[Certified Internal Auditors]] - CIAs) are governed by the international professional standards and code of conduct of the Institute of Internal Auditors.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/Pages/Standards-and-Guidance-IPPF.aspx |title=Pages - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) |publisher=Na.theiia.org |date=2000-01-01 |access-date=2013-09-02}}</ref> While internal auditors are not independent of the companies that employ them, independence and objectivity are a cornerstone of the IIA professional standards; and are discussed at length in the standards and the supporting practice guides and practice advisories. Professional internal auditors are mandated by the IIA standards to be independent of the business activities they audit. This independence and objectivity are achieved through the organizational placement and reporting lines of the internal audit department. Internal auditors of publicly traded companies in the United States are required to report functionally to the board of directors directly, or a sub-committee of the board of directors (typically the audit committee), and not to management except for administrative purposes. As described often in the professional literature for the practice of internal auditing (such as Internal Auditor, the journal of the IIA) -,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://na.theiia.org/periodicals/Pages/Internal-Auditor-Magazine.aspx |title=Professional internal auditors, in carrying out their responsibilities, apply COSO's Integrated Framework-Internal Control |publisher=Theiia.org}}</ref> or other similar and generally recognized frameworks for management control when evaluating an entity's governance and control practices; and apply COSO's "Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework" or other similar and generally recognized frameworks for entity-wide risk management when evaluating an organization's entity-wide risk management practices. Professional internal auditors also use [[control self-assessment]] (CSA) as an effective process for performing their work. |
|||
*Consultant auditors are external personnel contracted by the firm to perform an audit following the firm's [[Auditing Standards Board|auditing standards]]. This differs from the [[external auditor]], who follows their own auditing standards. The level of independence is therefore somewhere between the internal auditor and the external auditor. The consultant auditor may work independently, or as part of the audit team that includes internal auditors. Consultant auditors are used when the firm lacks sufficient expertise to audit certain areas, or simply for staff augmentation when staff are not available. |
|||
The most commonly used external audit standards are the US [[GAAS]] of the [[American Institute of Certified Public Accountants]] and the [[International Standards on Auditing]] (ISA) developed by the [[International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board|International Auditing and Assurance Standard]]. |
|||
==Performance audits== |
==Performance audits== |
||
[[Performance audit]] refers to an independent examination of a program, function, operation or the management systems and procedures of a governmental or non-profit entity to assess whether the entity is achieving economy, efficiency and effectiveness in the employment of available resources. |
|||
Safety, security, information systems performance, and environmental concerns are increasingly the subject of audits.<ref name=":0" /> There are now audit professionals who specialize in [[security audit]]s and [[information systems audit]]s. With nonprofit organizations and [[government agencies]], there has been an increasing need for [[performance audit]]s, examining their success in satisfying mission objectives. |
|||
Safety, security, information systems performance, and environmental concerns are increasingly the subject of audits.<ref name=":0" /> There are now audit professionals who specialize in [[security audit]]s and [[information systems audit]]s. With nonprofit organizations and [[government agencies]], there has been an increasing need for performance audits, examining their success in satisfying mission objectives{{Citation needed|date=December 2024}}. |
|||
==Quality audits== |
==Quality audits== |
||
Line 58: | Line 70: | ||
To benefit the organization, quality auditing should not only report non-conformance and corrective actions but also highlight areas of good practice and provide evidence of conformance. In this way, other departments may share information and amend their working practices as a result, also enhancing continual improvement. |
To benefit the organization, quality auditing should not only report non-conformance and corrective actions but also highlight areas of good practice and provide evidence of conformance. In this way, other departments may share information and amend their working practices as a result, also enhancing continual improvement. |
||
==Project |
==Project audit== |
||
A project audit provides an opportunity to uncover issues, concerns and challenges encountered during the project lifecycle.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://page-audit.com/pdf/undertaking-a-successful-project-auditrt.pdf |title=UNDERTAKING A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT AUDIT |last=Stanleigh |first=Micheal |date=2009 |website=PROJECT SMART |access-date=18 May 2016}}</ref> Conducted midway through the project, an audit affords the project manager, project sponsor and project team an interim view of what has gone well, as well as what needs to be improved to successfully complete the project. If done at the close of a project, the audit can be used to develop success criteria for future projects by providing a forensic review. This review identifies which elements of the project were successfully managed and which ones presented challenges. As a result, the review will help the organization identify what it needs to do to avoid repeating the same mistakes on future projects |
|||
Projects can undergo 2 types of [[Project audit]]s:<ref name=":0">Different Types of Audits (June 2013) [http://auditronix.com/what-is-audit-types/ Auditronix Guidance Note]</ref> |
|||
Projects can undergo 2 types of Project audits:<ref name=":0">Different Types of Audits (June 2013) [http://auditronix.com/what-is-audit-types/ Auditronix Guidance Note] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130718125350/http://auditronix.com/what-is-audit-types/ |date=July 18, 2013 }}</ref> |
|||
* '''Regular Health Check Audits''': The aim of a regular health check audit is to understand the current state of a project in order to increase project success. |
* '''Regular Health Check Audits''': The aim of a regular health check audit is to understand the current state of a project in order to increase project success. |
||
* '''Regulatory Audits''': The aim of a regulatory audit is to verify that a project is compliant with regulations and standards. Best practices of NEMEA Compliance |
* '''Regulatory Audits''': The aim of a regulatory audit is to verify that a project is compliant with regulations and standards. Best practices of NEMEA Compliance Centre describe that, the regulatory audit must be accurate, objective, and independent while providing oversight and assurance to the organization. |
||
Other forms of Project audits: |
|||
'''Formal:''' Applies when the project is in trouble, sponsor agrees that the audit is needed, sensitivities are high, and need to be able prove conclusions via sustainable evidence. |
|||
'''Informal:''' Apply when a new project manager is provided, there is no indication the projects in trouble and there is a need to report whether the project is as opposed to where its supposed to Informal audits can apply the same criteria as formal audit but there is no need for such a in depth report or formal report.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Clarke |first1=Kevin |last2=Walsh |first2=Kathleen |last3=Flanagan |first3=Jack |title=How prevalent are post-completion audits in Australia |journal=Accounting, Accountability & Performance |date=21 December 2020 |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=51–78 |url=https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.469182346697207?af=R}}</ref> |
|||
== Energy audits == |
== Energy audits == |
||
Line 71: | Line 90: | ||
== Operations audit == |
== Operations audit == |
||
{{Further|Operational audit}} |
{{Further|Operational audit}} |
||
An operations audit is an examination of the operations of the client's business. In this audit the auditor thoroughly examines the efficiency, effectiveness and economy of the operations with which the management of the entity (client) is achieving its objective. The operational audit goes beyond the internal controls issues since management does not achieve its objectives merely by compliance of satisfactory system of internal controls. Operational audits cover any matters which may be commercially unsound. |
An operations audit is an examination of the operations of the client's business. In this audit, the auditor thoroughly examines the efficiency, effectiveness and economy of the operations with which the management of the entity (client) is achieving its objective. The operational audit goes beyond the internal controls issues since management does not achieve its objectives merely by compliance of satisfactory system of internal controls. Operational audits cover any matters which may be commercially unsound. The objective of operational audit is to examine Three E's, namely:{{Citation needed|date=December 2012}} Effectiveness – doing the right things with least wastage of resources. Efficiency – performing work in least possible time. Economy – balance between benefits and costs to run the operations{{citation needed|date=December 2011}} |
||
The objective of operational audit is to examine Three E's, namely:{{Citation needed|date=December 2012}} |
|||
Effectiveness – doing the right things with least wastage of resources. |
|||
Efficiency – performing work in least possible time. |
|||
Economy – balance between benefits and costs to run the operations{{citation needed|date=December 2011}} |
|||
A [[control self-assessment]] is a commonly used tool for completing an operations audit.<ref name=CPAJournal>{{cite |
A [[control self-assessment]] is a commonly used tool for completing an operations audit.<ref name=CPAJournal>{{cite journal|url=http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2005/1205/essentials/p38.htm|title=The Use of Control Self-Assessment by Independent Auditors|author=Gilbert W. Joseph and Terry J. Engle|date=December 2005|access-date=10 March 2012|journal=The CPA Journal}}</ref> |
||
==Forensic audits== |
==Forensic audits== |
||
Also refer to [[forensic accountancy]], [[forensic accountant]] or [[forensic accounting]]. |
Also refer to [[forensic accountancy]], [[forensic accountant]] or [[forensic accounting]]. It refers to an investigative audit in which accountants with specialized on both accounting and investigation seek to uncover frauds, missing money and negligence.{{Citation needed|date=April 2023}} |
||
It refers to an investigative audit in which accountants with specialised on both accounting and investigation seek to uncover frauds, missing money and negligences |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
{{ |
{{Div col}} |
||
* [[Academic audit]] |
* [[Academic audit]] |
||
* [[Accounting]] |
* [[Accounting]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Audit plan]] |
||
* [[Big Four accounting firms]] |
|||
* [[Clinical audit]] |
|||
* [[Comptroller]], [[Comptroller General (disambiguation)|Comptroller General]], and [[Comptroller General of the United States]] |
* [[Comptroller]], [[Comptroller General (disambiguation)|Comptroller General]], and [[Comptroller General of the United States]] |
||
* [[Continuous auditing]] |
* [[Continuous auditing]] |
||
* [[Cost auditing]] |
|||
* [[Enterprise risk management#COSO ERM framework|COSO]] framework, [[Risk management]] |
* [[Enterprise risk management#COSO ERM framework|COSO]] framework, [[Risk management]] |
||
* [[EarthCheck]] |
* [[EarthCheck]] |
||
* [[Financial audit]], [[External auditor]], [[Certified Public Accountant]] (CPA), and [[Audit risk]] |
* [[Financial audit]], [[External auditor]], [[Certified Public Accountant]] (CPA), and [[Audit risk]] |
||
* [[Information technology audit]], [[History of information technology auditing]], and [[Information security audit]] |
|||
* [[Independent review]] |
|||
* [[Information technology audit]], [[Information technology audit process]], [[History of information technology auditing]], and [[Auditing information security]] |
|||
* [[Internal audit]] |
* [[Internal audit]] |
||
* [[International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions]] (INTOSAI) |
|||
* [[Value for Money Audit]] |
|||
* [[Lead auditor]], under the [[chief audit executive]] or Director of audit |
|||
* [[Audit Planning|Audit Plan]] |
|||
* [[Mainframe audit]] |
|||
* [[INTOSAI|INTOSAI (''International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions'')]] |
|||
* [[Management auditing]] |
|||
* [[Lead Auditor]], under the [[Chief Audit Executive]], or [[Chief audit executive|Director of Audit]] |
|||
* [[Operational auditing]] |
|||
* [[Peer review]] |
|||
* [[Quality audit]] |
* [[Quality audit]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Risk-based internal audit]] |
||
* [[Technical audit]] |
* [[Technical audit]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[SOFT audit]] |
||
* [[Operational audit]] |
|||
* [[Risk based auditing|Risk based audit]] |
|||
{{div col end}} |
{{div col end}} |
||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
*[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL755eKfbCjaxgxJf_TRaJouA8uzNkf79F Audit Classes] |
|||
== Further reading == |
== Further reading == |
||
* Amat |
* {{cite SSRN |last=Amat |first=O. |year=2008 |title=Earnings management and audit adjustments: An empirical study of IBEX 35 constituents |ssrn=1374232}} |
||
{{Audit}} |
|||
{{Social accountability|state=collapsed}} |
{{Social accountability|state=collapsed}} |
||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Auditing| |
[[Category:Auditing| ]] |
||
[[Category:Risk management]] |
|||
[[Category:Economics consulting]] |
|||
[[Category:Management cybernetics]] |
Latest revision as of 03:16, 14 December 2024
Part of a series on |
Accounting |
---|
An audit is an "independent examination of financial information of any entity, whether profit oriented or not, irrespective of its size or legal form when such an examination is conducted with a view to express an opinion thereon."[1] Auditing also attempts to ensure that the books of accounts are properly maintained by the concern as required by law. Auditors consider the propositions before them, obtain evidence, roll forward prior year working papers, and evaluate the propositions in their auditing report.[2]
Audits provide third-party assurance to various stakeholders that the subject matter is free from material misstatement.[3] The term is most frequently applied to audits of the financial information relating to a legal person. Other commonly audited areas include: secretarial and compliance, internal controls, quality management, project management, water management, and energy conservation. As a result of an audit, stakeholders may evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance over the subject matter.
In recent years auditing has expanded to encompass many areas of public and corporate life. Professor Michael Power refers to this extension of auditing practices as the "Audit Society".[4]
Etymology
[edit]The word "audit" derives from the Latin word audire which means "to hear".[5]
History
[edit]Auditing has been a safeguard measure since ancient times.[6] During medieval times, when manual bookkeeping was prevalent, auditors in Britain used to hear the accounts read out for them and checked that the organization's personnel were not negligent or fraudulent.[7] In 1951, Moyer identified that the most important duty of the auditor was to detect fraud.[8] Chatfield documented that early United States auditing was viewed mainly as verification of bookkeeping detail.[9]
The Central Auditing Commission of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Russian: Центральная ревизионная комиссия КПСС) operated from 1921 to 1990.
Information technology audit
[edit]An information technology audit, or information systems audit, is an examination of the management controls within an Information technology (IT) infrastructure. The evaluation of obtained evidence determines if the information systems are safeguarding assets, maintaining data integrity, and operating effectively to achieve the organization's goals or objectives. These reviews may be performed in conjunction with a financial statement audit, internal audit, or other form of attestation engagement.
Accounting
[edit]Due to strong incentives (including taxation, misselling and other forms of fraud) to misstate financial information, auditing has become a legal requirement for many entities who have the power to exploit financial information for personal gain. Traditionally, audits were mainly associated with gaining information about financial systems and the financial records of a company or a business. Financial audits also assess whether a business or corporation adheres to legal duties as well as other applicable statutory customs and regulations.[10][11]
Financial audits are performed to ascertain the validity and reliability of information, as well as to provide an assessment of a system's internal control. As a result, a third party can express an opinion of the person / organization / system (etc.) in question. The opinion given on financial statements will depend on the audit evidence obtained.
A statutory audit is a legally required review of the accuracy of a company's or government's financial statements and records. The purpose of a statutory audit is to determine whether an organization provides a fair and accurate representation of its financial position by examining information such as bank balances, bookkeeping records, and financial transactions.
Due to constraints, an audit seeks to provide only reasonable assurance that the statements are free from material error. Hence, statistical sampling is often adopted in audits. In the case of financial audits, a set of financial statements are said to be true and fair when they are free of material misstatements – a concept influenced by both quantitative (numerical) and qualitative factors. But recently, the argument that auditing should go beyond just true and fair is gaining momentum.[12] And the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has come out with a concept release on the same.[13]
Cost accounting is a process for verifying the cost of manufacturing or producing of any article, on the basis of accounts measuring the use of material, labor or other items of cost. In simple words, the term, cost audit means a systematic and accurate verification of the cost accounts and records, and checking for adherence to the cost accounting objectives. According to the Institute of Cost and Management Accountants, cost audit is "an examination of cost accounting records and verification of facts to ascertain that the cost of the product has been arrived at, in accordance with principles of cost accounting."[citation needed]
In most nations, an audit must adhere to generally accepted standards established by governing bodies. These standards assure third parties or external users that they can rely upon the auditor's opinion on the fairness of financial statements or other subjects on which the auditor expresses an opinion. The audit must therefore be precise and accurate, containing no additional misstatements or errors.[citation needed]
Integrated audits
[edit]In the US, audits of publicly traded companies are governed by rules laid down by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which was established by Section 404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Such an audit is called an integrated audit, where auditors, in addition to an opinion on the financial statements, must also express an opinion on the effectiveness of a company's internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5.[14]
There are also new types of integrated auditing becoming available that use unified compliance material (see the unified compliance section in Regulatory compliance). Due to the increasing number of regulations and need for operational transparency, organizations are adopting risk-based audits that can cover multiple regulations and standards from a single audit event.[citation needed] This is a very new but necessary approach in some sectors to ensure that all the necessary governance requirements can be met without duplicating effort from both audit and audit hosting resources.[citation needed]
Assessments
[edit]The purpose of an assessment is to measure something or calculate a value for it. An auditor's objective is to determine whether financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, and are free of material misstatement. Although the process of producing an assessment may involve an audit by an independent professional, its purpose is to provide a measurement rather than to express an opinion about the fairness of statements or quality of performance.[15]
Auditors
[edit]Auditors of financial statements & non-financial information (including compliance audit) can be classified into various categories:
- External auditor/Statutory auditor is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the audit to express an opinion on whether the company's financial statements are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. For publicly traded companies, external auditors may also be required to express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. External auditors may also be engaged to perform other agreed-upon procedures, related or unrelated to financial statements. Most importantly, external auditors, though engaged and paid by the company being audited, should be regarded as independent and remain third party.[citation needed]
- Cost auditor/Statutory cost auditor is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the cost audit to express an opinion on whether the company's cost statements and cost sheet are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. For publicly traded companies, external auditors may also be required to express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal controls over cost reporting. These are Specialized Persons called Cost Accountants in India & CMA globally either Cost & Management Accountants or Certified Management Accountants.
- Government Auditors review the finances and practices of federal agencies. These auditors report their finds to congress, which uses them to create and manage policies and budgets. Government auditors work for the U.S. Government Accountability Office, and most state governments have similar departments to audit state and municipal agencies.
- Secretarial auditor/Statutory secretarial auditor is an independent firm engaged by the client subject to the audit of secretarial and applicable laws/compliances of other applicable laws to express an opinion on whether the company's secretarial records and compliance of applicable laws are free of material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error and inviting heavy fines or penalties. For bigger public companies, external secretarial auditors may also be required to express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal controls over compliances system management of the company. These are Specialized Persons called Company Secretaries in India who are the members of Institute of Company Secretaries of India and holding Certificate of Practice. (http://www.icsi.edu/)
- Internal auditors are employed by the organizations they audit. They work for government agencies (federal, state and local); for publicly traded companies; and for non-profit companies across all industries. The internationally recognized standard setting body for the profession is the Institute of Internal Auditors - IIA (www.theiia.org). The IIA has defined internal auditing as follows: "Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes".[16] Thus professional internal auditors provide independent and objective audit and consulting services focused on evaluating whether the board of directors, shareholders, stakeholders, and corporate executives have reasonable assurance that the organization's governance, risk management, and control processes are designed adequately and function effectively. Internal audit professionals (Certified Internal Auditors - CIAs) are governed by the international professional standards and code of conduct of the Institute of Internal Auditors.[17] While internal auditors are not independent of the companies that employ them, independence and objectivity are a cornerstone of the IIA professional standards; and are discussed at length in the standards and the supporting practice guides and practice advisories. Professional internal auditors are mandated by the IIA standards to be independent of the business activities they audit. This independence and objectivity are achieved through the organizational placement and reporting lines of the internal audit department. Internal auditors of publicly traded companies in the United States are required to report functionally to the board of directors directly, or a sub-committee of the board of directors (typically the audit committee), and not to management except for administrative purposes. As described often in the professional literature for the practice of internal auditing (such as Internal Auditor, the journal of the IIA) -,[18] or other similar and generally recognized frameworks for management control when evaluating an entity's governance and control practices; and apply COSO's "Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework" or other similar and generally recognized frameworks for entity-wide risk management when evaluating an organization's entity-wide risk management practices. Professional internal auditors also use control self-assessment (CSA) as an effective process for performing their work.
- Consultant auditors are external personnel contracted by the firm to perform an audit following the firm's auditing standards. This differs from the external auditor, who follows their own auditing standards. The level of independence is therefore somewhere between the internal auditor and the external auditor. The consultant auditor may work independently, or as part of the audit team that includes internal auditors. Consultant auditors are used when the firm lacks sufficient expertise to audit certain areas, or simply for staff augmentation when staff are not available.
The most commonly used external audit standards are the US GAAS of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the International Standards on Auditing (ISA) developed by the International Auditing and Assurance Standard.
Performance audits
[edit]Performance audit refers to an independent examination of a program, function, operation or the management systems and procedures of a governmental or non-profit entity to assess whether the entity is achieving economy, efficiency and effectiveness in the employment of available resources. Safety, security, information systems performance, and environmental concerns are increasingly the subject of audits.[19] There are now audit professionals who specialize in security audits and information systems audits. With nonprofit organizations and government agencies, there has been an increasing need for performance audits, examining their success in satisfying mission objectives[citation needed].
Quality audits
[edit]Quality audits are performed to verify conformance to standards through review of objective evidence. A system of quality audits may verify the effectiveness of a quality management system. This is part of certifications such as ISO 9001. Quality audits are essential to verify the existence of objective evidence showing conformance to required processes, to assess how successfully processes have been implemented, and to judge the effectiveness of achieving any defined target levels. Quality audits are also necessary to provide evidence concerning reduction and elimination of problem areas, and they are a hands-on management tool for achieving continual improvement in an organization.
To benefit the organization, quality auditing should not only report non-conformance and corrective actions but also highlight areas of good practice and provide evidence of conformance. In this way, other departments may share information and amend their working practices as a result, also enhancing continual improvement.
Project audit
[edit]A project audit provides an opportunity to uncover issues, concerns and challenges encountered during the project lifecycle.[20] Conducted midway through the project, an audit affords the project manager, project sponsor and project team an interim view of what has gone well, as well as what needs to be improved to successfully complete the project. If done at the close of a project, the audit can be used to develop success criteria for future projects by providing a forensic review. This review identifies which elements of the project were successfully managed and which ones presented challenges. As a result, the review will help the organization identify what it needs to do to avoid repeating the same mistakes on future projects
Projects can undergo 2 types of Project audits:[19]
- Regular Health Check Audits: The aim of a regular health check audit is to understand the current state of a project in order to increase project success.
- Regulatory Audits: The aim of a regulatory audit is to verify that a project is compliant with regulations and standards. Best practices of NEMEA Compliance Centre describe that, the regulatory audit must be accurate, objective, and independent while providing oversight and assurance to the organization.
Other forms of Project audits:
Formal: Applies when the project is in trouble, sponsor agrees that the audit is needed, sensitivities are high, and need to be able prove conclusions via sustainable evidence.
Informal: Apply when a new project manager is provided, there is no indication the projects in trouble and there is a need to report whether the project is as opposed to where its supposed to Informal audits can apply the same criteria as formal audit but there is no need for such a in depth report or formal report.[21]
Energy audits
[edit]An energy audit is an inspection, survey and analysis of energy flows for energy conservation in a building, process or system to reduce the amount of energy input into the system without negatively affecting the output(s).
Operations audit
[edit]An operations audit is an examination of the operations of the client's business. In this audit, the auditor thoroughly examines the efficiency, effectiveness and economy of the operations with which the management of the entity (client) is achieving its objective. The operational audit goes beyond the internal controls issues since management does not achieve its objectives merely by compliance of satisfactory system of internal controls. Operational audits cover any matters which may be commercially unsound. The objective of operational audit is to examine Three E's, namely:[citation needed] Effectiveness – doing the right things with least wastage of resources. Efficiency – performing work in least possible time. Economy – balance between benefits and costs to run the operations[citation needed]
A control self-assessment is a commonly used tool for completing an operations audit.[22]
Forensic audits
[edit]Also refer to forensic accountancy, forensic accountant or forensic accounting. It refers to an investigative audit in which accountants with specialized on both accounting and investigation seek to uncover frauds, missing money and negligence.[citation needed]
See also
[edit]- Academic audit
- Accounting
- Audit plan
- Big Four accounting firms
- Clinical audit
- Comptroller, Comptroller General, and Comptroller General of the United States
- Continuous auditing
- Cost auditing
- COSO framework, Risk management
- EarthCheck
- Financial audit, External auditor, Certified Public Accountant (CPA), and Audit risk
- Information technology audit, History of information technology auditing, and Information security audit
- Internal audit
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI)
- Lead auditor, under the chief audit executive or Director of audit
- Mainframe audit
- Management auditing
- Operational auditing
- Peer review
- Quality audit
- Risk-based internal audit
- Technical audit
- SOFT audit
References
[edit]- ^ Gupta, Kamal (November 2004). Contemporary Auditing. McGraw Hill. p. 1095. ISBN 0070585849.
- ^ "Audit assurance".
- ^ PricewaterhouseCoopers. "What is an audit?". PwC. Retrieved 2022-03-03.
- ^ Power, Michael (1999), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- ^ Assurance, Auditing and. "Chapter 1". ICAI - The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Vol. 1. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. p. 1.
- ^ Loeb, Stephen E.; Shamoo, Adil E. (1989-09-01). "Data audit: Its place in auditing". Accountability in Research. 1 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1080/08989628908573771. ISSN 0898-9621. PMID 26859053.
- ^ Derek Matthews, History of Auditing (2006-09-27). The changing audit process from the 19th century till date. Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group. p. 6. ISBN 9781134177912.
- ^ C. A., Moyer (January 1951). "Early Developments in American Auditing". Accounting Review. 26 (1): 3–8. JSTOR 239850.
- ^ Johnson, H. Thomas (1975). "Reviewed work: A History of Accounting Thought, Michael Chatfield". The Business History Review. 49 (2): 256–257. doi:10.2307/3113713. JSTOR 3113713. S2CID 154953655.
- ^ Mishra, Birendra K.; Paul Newman, D.; Stinson, Christopher H. (1997). "Environmental regulations and incentives for compliance audits". Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 16 (2): 187–214. doi:10.1016/S0278-4254(97)00003-3. Retrieved 1 April 2023.
- ^ Thottoli, Mohammed Muneerali (2021). "The relevance of compliance audit on companies' compliance with disclosure guidelines of financial statements". Journal of Investment Compliance. 22 (2). Emerald Insight: 137–150. doi:10.1108/JOIC-12-2020-0047. S2CID 236598426. Retrieved 1 April 2023.
- ^ McKenna, Francine. "Auditors and Audit Reports: Is The Firm's "John Hancock" Enough?". Forbes. Retrieved 22 July 2011.
- ^ "CONCEPT RELEASE ON POSSIBLE REVISIONS TO PCAOB STANDARDS RELATED TO REPORTS ON AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS" (PDF). Retrieved 22 July 2011.
- ^ "Auditing Standard No. 5". pcaobus.org. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
- ^ Ladda, R.L. Basic Concepts Of Accounting. Solapur: Laxmi Book Publication. p. 58. ISBN 978-1-312-16130-6.
- ^ "Pages - Definition of Internal Auditing". Na.theiia.org. 2000-01-01. Retrieved 2013-09-02.
- ^ "Pages - International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)". Na.theiia.org. 2000-01-01. Retrieved 2013-09-02.
- ^ "Professional internal auditors, in carrying out their responsibilities, apply COSO's Integrated Framework-Internal Control". Theiia.org.
- ^ a b Different Types of Audits (June 2013) Auditronix Guidance Note Archived July 18, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Stanleigh, Micheal (2009). "UNDERTAKING A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT AUDIT" (PDF). PROJECT SMART. Retrieved 18 May 2016.
- ^ Clarke, Kevin; Walsh, Kathleen; Flanagan, Jack (21 December 2020). "How prevalent are post-completion audits in Australia". Accounting, Accountability & Performance. 18 (2): 51–78.
- ^ Gilbert W. Joseph and Terry J. Engle (December 2005). "The Use of Control Self-Assessment by Independent Auditors". The CPA Journal. Retrieved 10 March 2012.