Jump to content

User talk:MrX: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
KU2018 (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 821288579 by MrX (talk)
Notification: proposed deletion of Plaza South Tower.
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=March 2022}}
{{User:MrX/navbar}}
== 😔 ==


--[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 19:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
{{Archive box|box-width=160px|collapsed=yes|
:I think we can agree on that one. Me and MrX rarely agreed either but that does not mean I wanted to see them leave like this. I do hope you return. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng|talk]]) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
'''2011'''<br>
::I endorse this comment. I always viewed MrX as someone I could approach for a better discussion no matter if we disagreed on the content. [[User:Mr Ernie|Mr Ernie]] ([[User talk:Mr Ernie|talk]]) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
*[[/Archive/July-September 2011|July - September]]<br><br>
: Well that's a shame. I was going to ask MrX to help write a refinement of the RfC guidelines to cover challenged closes, because we have terrible processes around this and it is probably the only area on Wikipedia where a single person can effectively mandate specific content. '''[[user:JzG|Guy]]''' <small>([[user talk:JzG|help!]] - [[User:JzG/Typos|typo?]])</small> 21:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
'''2012'''<br>
:MrX, I do hope you return to the project, even if after you take time off. Your contributions have been superb, and greatly valued - certainly by me and many others. You know, I'm strongly reminded of a [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/the-respectful-disagreements-of-judge-merrick-garland/2016/03/18/7f8eee4e-ed17-11e5-b0fd-073d5930a7b7_story.html quote] by [[John G. Roberts, Jr.]], talking about a difficult case:
*[[/Archive/July-September 2012|July - September]]<br>
::"Any time [[Merrick Garland|Judge Garland]] disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served."
*[[/Archive/October-December 2012|October - December]]<br><br>
:We the community - and ultimately our end-user, the reader - have always been well served by your contributions and wisdom. And it would be regrettable if this one messy disagreement between you and [[User:JzG|Guy]] &mdash; two users I respect very much &mdash; led you to part ways with the project permanently. Be well, and all best wishes. --[[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
'''2013'''<br>
::{{u|Neutrality}}, Thank you. I like and respect MrX. I am mystified by the trajectory this has taken, and genuinely mortified that he has expressed a desire to leave, on which I hope he reconsiders. I hope people will take a look at {{section link|Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment|Process for challenging closes}}. '''[[user:JzG|Guy]]''' <small>([[user talk:JzG|help!]] - [[User:JzG/Typos|typo?]])</small> 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
*[[/Archive/January-March 2013|January - March]]<br>
* I'm sorry that you're taking a break because of this, it's unnecessary, except of course as merited holiday if stress was too high. It's unfortunate when what should be a hobby becomes responsibility, work and no play (and that of course happens because we care about the project). I hope to see you around again when you feel like it, —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 02:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
*[[/Archive/April-June 2013|April - June]]<br>
*[[/Archive/July-September 2013|July - September]]<br>
*[[/Archive/October-December 2013|October - December]]<br><br>
'''2014'''<br>
*[[/Archive/January-March 2014|January - March]]<br>
*[[/Archive/April-June 2014|April - June]]<br>
*[[/Archive/July-September 2014|July - September]]<br>
*[[/Archive/October-December 2014|October-December]]
'''2015'''<br>
*[[/Archive/January-March 2015|January - March]]<br>
*[[/Archive/April-June 2015|April - June]]<br>
*[[/Archive/July-September 2015|July - September]]<br>
*[[/Archive/October-December 2015|October-December]]
'''2016'''<br>
*[[/Archive/January-March 2016|January - March]]<br>
*[[/Archive/April-June 2016|April - June]]<br>
*[[/Archive/July-September 2016|July - September]]<br>
*[[/Archive/October-December 2016|October-December]]
'''2017'''<br>
*[[/Archive/January-March 2017|January - March]]<br>
*[[/Archive/April-June 2017|April - June]]<br>
*[[/Archive/July-September 2017|July - September]]<br>
*[[/Archive/October-December 2017|October-December]]
'''2018'''<br>
*[[/Archive/January-March 2018|January - March]]<br>
*[[/Archive/April-June 2018|April - June]]<br>
*[[/Archive/July-September 2018|July - September]]<br>
*[[/Archive/October-December 2018|October-December]]
}}
{{clear}}


*Best of luck with what you do. [[User:Kraose|Kraose]] ([[User talk:Kraose|talk]]) 13:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
== WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions ==


This is a sad turn of events, but here's to happiness in your break, and in your life, MrX. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|talk]])''' 03:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge|The 10,000 Challenge]] of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
You may submit articles using [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&editintro=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject+Canada%2FThe+10%2C000+Challenge%2FEditintro&summary=added+article+to+challenge+list&title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject+Canada%2FThe+10%2C000+Challenge%2FRecent+additions&create=Submit+an+article this link] for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – [[User:Reidgreg|Reidgreg]] ([[User talk:Reidgreg|talk]]) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Reidgreg/sandbox2&oldid=803948530 -->


You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.
== New Page Reviewer Newsletter ==


For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages![[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|120px]]


You have shown interest in articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.
'''Backlog update''':
*The new page backlog is currently at <big>[[Special:NewPagesFeed|12,878]]</big> pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
*We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before [[Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed article creation trial|ACTRIAL]]. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
'''Technology update''':
*Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see '''[[User:Primefac/revdel]]'''.
'''General project update''':
*The [[Wikipedia:Article_wizard|Article Wizard]] has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the [[Wikipedia:New user landing page|new user landing page]]. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
*To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to '''[[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers]]''' and add it to your watchlist.
<hr/>
<small>If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]] [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)</small>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:TonyBallioni@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=804236258 -->


For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
==RFC closer==
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - [[user:MrX|MrX]][[user talk:MrX| 🖋]] 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
There wasn't a clear consensus, and I opened a new RFC recently, and opposed the same, one of the earlier Opposer support the inclusion there too. There are other problems involving COI. Please remove the mention that there was a consensus. Should I ring this up at AN or ANI? Thanks.[[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 13:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
:Unfortunately {{U|Prokaryotes}}, I don't know what you're referring to. Please provide links or diffs.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 13:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
::See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plimpton_322#Proposal_for_inclusion this] more recent RFC. When I created that RFC i wasn't aware that there was another RFC, and that RFC it seems wasn't posted there by that section author. In the new RFC the authors who oppose inclusion posted all within hours. There is evidence that at least some of those authors have a COI. Not entirely sure how to proceed, but the previous RFC should factor in my oppose and the support of one of the other opposers who supports my RFC, when consensus is weighted. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 14:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
:::I don.t know how you managed to miss the RfC that was opened 10 days before yours, but it doesn't change the outcome of the RfC that I closed anyway. Your duplicate RfC is out of process, and it would likely result in the same determination of consensus.


:::I respectfully decline to overturn my close, but of course you are welcome to [[WP:CLOSECHALLENGE|request a close review]].- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 14:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
::::Can I wait a couple of days with this (I want to offer involved editors the chance to declare their COI), otherwise my argument will involve COI. Also just by counting it appears there was just one more vote opposing, and I would obviously had voted oppose too if aware that my newer RFC oppose isn't factored in. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 14:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
:::::Yes, I think that's entirely up to you.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 14:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
::::Also the section creator is the author of the study, but it appears he didn't started the RFC, can you confirm this (that the RFC wasn't started by the section author)? Thanks. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 14:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
:::::I don't see how that would have any bearing on the outcome. Maybe I'm missing your point?- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 14:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
:::::: Yeah well, i guess you are right, but the reason i missed that RFC was if i recall correctly that this RFC was buried somewhere at the bottom, just as a small notice box, without a sub section heading. Anyway thanks for the pointers. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 14:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
:::::::Sure. Hopefully it worked out on the article talk page to (most) everyone's satisfaction.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 23:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
== Plimpton - duplicate RFC ==
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg|120px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | If you ever come back, here's some tea for you. Lucky wiki-tea doesn't get cold. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|talk]])''' 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
|}

*Rather late here due to my break, but like others I wish you well and happiness in your life. I'll never forget the help you gave me when I first started here and even after that, you remained someone I could look up to as an editor for his wisdom and who always remained civil even amidst the most controversial discussions. -[[User:Ugog Nizdast|Ugog&nbsp;Nizdast]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Ugog Nizdast|talk]]) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
:::Thank you {{U|Neutrality}}, {{u|Starship.paint}}, {{U|Kraose}}, {{U|Ugog Nizdast}}, and {{U|Mr Ernie}}. I appreciate your heartfelt kindness. - [[user:MrX|MrX]][[user talk:MrX| 🖋]] 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

::::MrX, I am so happy to hear from you. I hope that you are well, these have been tough times indeed. '''[[User:Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">starship</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|<span style="color:#512888">.paint</span>]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|exalt]])''' 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

== A toast sandwich for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:An image of a toast sandwich, shot from the side.jpg|120px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Looks like I missed something a few months ago, and only just realized I hadn't seen your name around in a while.

Looking at the food or drink items in the WikiLove gadget like greeting cards, I'm thinking about the signification of the various options. Something sweet? Savory? Coffee/tea seem pretty generally friendly, I guess. I'll go with toast sandwich because I have no idea what that would mean to receive a toast sandwich. Kind of a "huh?" -- but maybe a "huh?" that draws your attention to Wikipedia long enough to come back after a [restful, hopefully] break. &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
|}
:Thank you [[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]]. I appreciate your sentiment. And I've always appreciated your insightful comments that accrue to the benefit of Wikipedia. - [[user:MrX|MrX]][[user talk:MrX| 🖋]] 20:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

== Some baklava for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Baklava - Turkish special, 80-ply.JPEG|135px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Also miss having MrX around. Great contributor. [[User:Stefka Bulgaria|Stefka Bulgaria]] ([[User talk:Stefka Bulgaria|talk]]) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
|}
:Thank you, [[User talk:Stefka Bulgaria|Stefka Bulgaria]], for your kindness. - [[user:MrX|MrX]][[user talk:MrX| 🖋]] 20:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

== Precious anniversary ==
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}}
miss you --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 12:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC:)
:Thank you [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] for you making Wikipeidia exceptional, as you always do. - [[user:MrX|MrX]][[user talk:MrX| 🖋]] 20:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


== Nomination of [[:Boden, Florida]] for deletion ==
You recently closed[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APlimpton_322&type=revision&diff=806661010&oldid=806253187] an RFC at [[Talk:Plimpton_322#Request_for_comment|Plimpton_322#Request_for_comment]].
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Boden, Florida]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].


The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boden, Florida]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Unfortunately, after that RFC-template expired, but before closure, someone opened a duplicate RFC at [[Talk:Plimpton_322#Proposal_for_inclusion]]. The only new response on the duplicate RFC is the person who opened the duplicate RFC.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
I was very tempted to place a purely procedural close on the duplicate RFC. However I the other side has already been tossing out claims of conspiracy, suppression, and absurd conflict of interest arguments. [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 20:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="font-family: Times;">[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eastmain|contribs]])</span> 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|Alsee}} Please see the section immediately above. The duplicate RfC could be closed, or it could be left open to see if a new consensus develops. I don't know if it really matters either way. I do think that COI aspersions are not going to lead to a productive resolution of the dispute.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 20:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
::I saw the section above after I hit save, chuckle. Would you close the duplicate as well? Before you closed, I had left a request at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Duplicate_simultaneous_RFC]] asking for the duplicate to be closed. Running a duplicate RFC is effectively forum shopping. I also find it difficult to believe [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] didn't know about the first RFC. They closely examined the section titled '''Request_for_comment''', with support and oppose votes, and they pinged every person and IP in the section. Including duplicate pings to supporters who using multiple usernames or edited while logged out. [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 20:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
:::Someone eles will have to close the duplicate RfC, although there is no requirement that RfCs be formally closed if their outcome is obvious. My previous close has been challenged, so it would only compound the situation if I were to close the duplicate RfC.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 21:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
:MrX, I've asked for a review yesterday [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Request_for_RFC_review here]. I have no idea what you mean by COI aspersions, the topic was first brought up when a study author got involved, and since other involved editors also publish math studies I saw it fit to post a general COI notice. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 20:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
:Also when I count correctly, with my newer RFC vote there seems to be a close tie of the amount of people opposing and supporting inclusion. Yesterday I also brought up commentary published in the magazine Science, not previously discussed, essentially calling it robust, but speculative. (See newest section [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plimpton_322#Resolving_article_scope here]) Unfortunately, since the first RFC commenced, the opposing editors are more active. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 20:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
::I used the word "aspersions" in sense that your stated concern about COI was not directed at specific people, but was instead directed at anyone who would care to admit it. More of a sprinkling if you will. The close tie in the number of people supporting and opposing the disputed content is indicative of no consensus. I'm not sure why the same content needs to be discussed in multiple sections. It seems a bit counterproductive.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 21:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
:::I wasn't aware of the previous RFC, it was buried somewhere at the bottom of that related section if I recall correctly. If I had been aware I would have replied there obviously and had supported the inclusion. [[User:Prokaryotes|prokaryotes]] ([[User talk:Prokaryotes|talk]]) 21:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


== Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed ==
== Seeking mentor ==


Hello '''MrX'''! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AutoWikiBrowser]] may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPageJSON|CheckPage]]. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at [[WP:PERM/AWB]]. Thank you! <span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:MusikBot II|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot II</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></span></span> 17:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
From [[Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters]], are you interested? [[User:X1\|X1\]] ([[User talk:X1\|talk]]) 21:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
:Hi {{u|X1\}}. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm sorry, but I'm not able to take on any adoptees at this time because of my limited available time. I would be happy to answer any questions you have or point you in the right direction on an as-needed basis. Just post any questions here in this section and I will do the best I can to help. - [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 23:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


== Halloween cheer! ==
== Boo! ==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Wikipedia Halloween's Day.png|214px|left]][[File:Halloween pumpkin night puzzle.jpg|246px|right]]
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Wikipedia Halloween's Day.png|214px|left]][[File:Halloween pumpkin night puzzle.jpg|246px|right]]


{{Center|'''''{{resize|187%|Happy [[Halloween]]!}}'''''}}
{{Center|'''''{{resize|187%|Happy [[Halloween]]!}}'''''}}
----
----
'''Hello MrX:<br>Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable [[Halloween]]!'''<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;{{spaced ndash}} —<span style="font-size: 104%; letter-spacing:1.5pt;"><span style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran[[User talk:Usernamekiran|<span style="letter-spacing:1pt;">'''(talk)'''</span>]]</span></span> 21:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
'''Hello {{{user|{{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}}}}:<br>Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable [[Halloween]]!'''<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; —usernamekiran sign the [[User:Usernamekiran/guestbook|guestbook]] [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 22:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)<br /><br /></div>
{{clear}}
<br><br>{{Center|<small>Send Halloween cheer by adding {{tls|Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.</small>}}
== Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:Good source]] ==
</div>{{clear}}
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|30px|link=]][[:Template:Good source]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for deletion]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 7#Template:Good source|the entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 00:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
:Thank you {{U|usernamekiran}}. As well to you.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 23:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


== Nomination of [[:Vista, Washington]] for deletion ==
== Editing BLP material ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Vista, Washington]]''', to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Vista,_Washington significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].


The discussion will take place at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vista, Washington]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Please don't reinstate unsourced contentious material about a living person. See [[WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE]]. If BullRangifer has sources, they can be cited, but I believe you two (or three) are just peddling unverifiable conspiracy theories. [[User:Politrukki|Politrukki]] ([[User talk:Politrukki|talk]]) 15:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
:No, I'm sorry but we don't require sources on a talk page as long as editors are discussing content in good faith. I strongly suggest you stop removing the material, in opposition to multiple experienced editors. It's very disruptive.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 15:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
::Experienced users should know that BLP applies to talk pages. Experienced users should know not to oppose good faith BLP objections. I don't know whether you did it deliberately or whether you just didn't know what you were doing – I'm assuming the latter – but reinstating BLP violations is very disruptive. [[User:Politrukki|Politrukki]] ([[User talk:Politrukki|talk]]) 16:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
== Threats are uncalled for ==


== Nomination of [[:Richland Junction, Richland]] for deletion ==
[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&diff=810949773&oldid=810948834 This threat] was totally uncalled for, and I strongly suggest that you limit your comments to the BLP vio and not me. You already demonstrated your unfamiliarity with BLP policy and what constitutes a RS when Opinion pieces and Perspectives are involved, so if anyone is treading anywhere, you might want to look more closely at where you're headed. <sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">[[User:Atsme|Atsme]]</font>[[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 15:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Richland Junction, Richland]]''', to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Richland_Junction,_Richland significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
:No ma'ma, it was very much called for and I meant every syllable of it. I, and other editors (even admins), have tried to explain to you why throwing a bunch of random policies at the wall to see which will stick is not helpful. As of late, some of your comments a just so blatantly false that it's no longer possible to assume good faith. I'm not sure if you really are confused about what policies actually mean, or if you are trying to use them as blunt objects. Either way, it has moved from being annoyingly amusing to being outright disruptive.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 15:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
:Atsme, he's got a point there. I do give you credit for your survival skills and personal charm. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 15:54, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
::I third the call for sending OP Enforcement for appropriate [[flogging]] and [[exile]]. My god, if this is ‘t a case of [[WP: Not here]], and [[WP: Competence is required]], then what is? OP couldn’t read her way out of a paper bag if the instructions were printed in 14 point type. Never have I seen such a tendentious editor so insistent on reading poorly and insistent on willfully misreading what every source has to say. Never have I seen an editor delete articles written by professors in the field, b/c they are “opinions” and then replace then with her own illiterate ramblings. OP lost the deletion discussion , and then chose to destroy the article from the inside by gutting it of content, reliable sources, and intentionally adding falsehoods to it, and writing in prose which, no offense, reads like it was written by a middle schooler. Everyone who reads that article knows less about it due to the relentless efforts of OP to edit war to destroy the article, after her initial attempt to delete the article resulted in asnow ieep, and a number of editors questioning her objectivity, competence, and judgment. My god, if this isn’t a bannable offense then what is? Every day this user is allowed to destroy pages by touching them is a day this project is endangered. She is easily the most destructive editor I have ever seen on Wikipedia, and has no real competitiors for the doshonour.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:75.99.95.250|75.99.95.250]] ([[User talk:75.99.95.250#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/75.99.95.250|contribs]]) 18:21, November 18, 2017 (UTC)</small>
:::No need to exaggerate here. Atsme is generally a good contributor who does a lot of good for the project, but I think she has strong views about political subjects which creates blindspots.- [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 18:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
::::Thank you for the kind words, MrX. The IP is part of a huge sock farm, and he's finding new IP addresses faster than admins can block him. Several admins are aware of his activities. <sup><font style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">[[User:Atsme|Atsme]]</font>[[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 19:54, 18 November 2017 (UTC)


The discussion will take place at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richland Junction, Richland]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
== Happy Turkey Day! (if you celebrate the event, if not Happy Any Day!) ==


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
{|style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 3px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="align: top; padding: 5px;" |[[File:Roasted_turkey.jpg|thumb|left|Me:I was going to serve yams with Thanksgiving dinner, but I sat on them.
Mom: What are you serving now? <br/>
Me: Squash.<br/>]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 6px 6px 0 6px; height: 1.5em;" |<center>'''Wishing You A Happy Turkey Day!'''
|-
|<center>A Thanksgiving tale...</center><br/>
Two pilgrims go out hunting. One has two blunderbusses (guns).<br/>
The second pilgrim queries, “Why two blunderbusses?” <br/>
The first pilgrim responds, “I usually miss on the first shot; with two I can shoot again”.<br/>
The second pilgrim pauses, then asks, “Why not just take the second one, and only shoot once?”<br/>
<br/>
<small><sup>[[User:Atsme|<span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme</span>]][[User talk:Atsme |📞]][[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]]</sup> 22:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)</small><br/>
|}
:Thank you {{u|Atsme}}. Happy Thanksgiving to you as well! - [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 23:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


== Nomination of [[:Chaffee, Washington]] for deletion ==
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Chaffee, Washington]]''', to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Chaffee,_Washington significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].


The discussion will take place at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaffee, Washington]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
{{Ivmbox|Hello, MrX. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


== Nomination of [[:Whitcomb, Washington]] for deletion ==
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Whitcomb, Washington]]''', to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Whitcomb,_Washington significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 -->


The discussion will take place at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitcomb, Washington]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
== Russian RfC ==


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
Suggest you seek closure through one of the established channels. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 02:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|SPECIFICO}} Anyone who is so-inclined can do that themselves, but it's not even necessary if the result is obvious.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 22:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
::Well, but actually they are continuing discussion trying to nullify the snow result of your RfC, which should have killed this ugly fringe vampire dead. I've lost track are all these nonsense denialist bits removed from the article? If not, that needs to be done and any reinsertion contrary to the results of the RfC needs to be dealt with. These BS sidetrack discussions are a huge waste of scarce editor time and attention. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 22:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
:::If the material is inserted, it will be removed because there's rough consensus against including it. Nobody is required to keep arguing with people who never give up and who keep repeating the same arguments over and over. I'm not going to request a formal close, because I just don't care, but you're welcome to request one if you think it will help.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 23:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)


== Nomination of [[:Apricot, Washington]] for deletion ==
== New Page Reviewer Newsletter ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Apricot, Washington]]''', to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Apricot,_Washington significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].


The discussion will take place at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apricot, Washington]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages![[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|120px]]


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
'''Backlog update''':
*The new page backlog is currently at <big>[[Special:NewPagesFeed|12713]]</big> pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
*Currently the '''[[Special:NewPagesFeed|backlog stretches back to March]]''' and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
'''Outreach and Invitations''':
*If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, '''invite them to join NPP''' by dropping the [[Template:NPR invite|invitation template]] on their talk page with: <code><nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki></code>. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.


== Nomination of [[:North McNary, Washington]] for deletion ==
'''New Year New Page Review Drive'''
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:North McNary, Washington]]''', to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/North_McNary,_Washington significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
*A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
*Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, <u>please do not sacrifice quality for quantity</u>.


The discussion will take place at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North McNary, Washington]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
'''General project update''':
*[[Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed article creation trial|ACTRIAL]] has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer [[WP:CSD|CSD]], [[WP:PROD|PROD]], and [[WP:BLPPROD|BLPPROD]] candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
*'''[https://tools.wmflabs.org/nppbrowser/ The NPP Browser]''' can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
*To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to '''[[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers]]''' and add it to your watchlist.
<hr/>
<small>If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]] — ''''' [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) </small>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:TonyBallioni@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=814737513 -->


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
== Season's Greetings ==


==Request to remove TBAN==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0 0.5em; {{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!--
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Request_to_remove_TBAN here].[[User:Anythingyouwant|&#32;Anythingyouwant]] ([[User talk:Anythingyouwant|talk]]) 05:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
-->;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Happy Holidays (2135831016).jpg|206px|left]][[File:Arbuckle Bros. (3093003361).jpg|177px|right]][[File:Season's Greetings, Christmas Card from 320 Ranch.jpg|205px|left]]{{Center|[[File:Happy Holidays text.png|301px]]}}
== Nomination of [[:Hydrogen water]] for deletion ==
'''Hello MrX:''' Enjoy the '''[[Christmas and holiday season|holiday season]]''', and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand [[Wikipedia]]. Cheers, '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|-- ψλ]]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 16:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
<div class="afd-notice">
[[File:A book of country clouds and sunshine (1897), cropped.jpg|center|500px]]{{paragraph break}}{{-}}
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Hydrogen water]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
</div>
{{paragraph break}}
:<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings1}} to send this message}}''</div>{{-}}
::Thank you {{U|Winkelvi}}. I hope your holidays are splendid as well.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 22:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrogen water]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
=="tis the season...."==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0 0.5em; {{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!--
-->;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Happy Holidays (2135831016).jpg|206px|left]][[File:Arbuckle Bros. (3093003361).jpg|177px|right]][[File:Season's Greetings, Christmas Card from 320 Ranch.jpg|205px|left]]{{Center|[[File:Happy Holidays text.png|301px]]}}
'''Hello MrX:''' Enjoy the '''[[Christmas and holiday season|holiday season]]''', and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand [[Wikipedia]]. Cheers, &#8213;[[User:Buster7|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Buster7'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Buster7|<span style="color:#AAA;">&#9742;</span>]] 20:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
[[File:A book of country clouds and sunshine (1897), cropped.jpg|center|500px]]{{paragraph break}}{{-}}
</div>
{{paragraph break}}
:<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings1}} to send this message}}''</div>{{-}}
I see someone else sent the same card. &#8213;[[User:Buster7|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Buster7'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Buster7|<span style="color:#AAA;">&#9742;</span>]]
:Thank you {{U|Buster7}}. Happy holidays to you as well. <small>(It looks like you shop at the same [[Hallmark Cards|Hallmark]] shop as Winkelvi. Haha.)</small>


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
== Usage of refideas ==
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄</span>]]) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


== You have been pruned from a list ==
The refideas template has usage on over 5000 pages https://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&name=Refideas&namespace=10#bottom --[[User:Emir of Wikipedia|Emir of Wikipedia]] ([[User talk:Emir of Wikipedia|talk]]) 12:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
:Oh for crying out loud. If you think a source should be used, use it, or place it in a regular talk page discussion where it can be archived when nobody else thinks it's useful. The top of article talk pages is not a shrine to URLs.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 12:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


'''Hi MrX!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members]], but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
== Happy New Year, MrX! ==
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;{{border-radius|1em}} {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}}<!--
-->" class="plainlinks">[[File:Fuochi d'artificio.gif|left|x173px]][[File:Happy new year 01.svg|x173px|right]]
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|'''''[[New Year|Happy New Year]]!'''''}}}}
'''MrX''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable [[New Year]], and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
<br />'''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|-- ψλ]]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 23:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)<br /><br />
</div>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}
:Thank you {{U|Winkelvi}}. Happy New Year to you also!- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 00:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members]].
== New Years new page backlog drive ==


'''Thank you!'''
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. &#124; Sent at 18:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages![[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|120px]]


== Precious anniversary ==
<big>'''Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!'''</big>
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}}
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


==Happy holidays!==
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the '''[[Special:NewPagesFeed|New Pages Feed backlog]]''' by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
[[File:Surrealist painting of raccoons in fancy clothes enjoying New Years Eve party in a light bulb factory, writing encyclopedias.png|thumb|Happy New Year!]]
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, MrX!


The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 18:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
The backlog drive will begin on January 1<sup>st</sup> and run until January 29<sup>th</sup>. Prize tiers and other info can be found [[WT:NPR#New Year Backlog Drive|HERE]].
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Chuice]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]


The article [[:Chuice]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
<blockquote>'''Basically [[WP:PROMO]]. Non-notable product. Orphaned for a decade.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
*The total number of reviews completed for the month.
*The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Chuice|the article's talk page]].
NOTE: It is extremely important that we <u>focus on quality reviewing</u>. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:pepperbeast|<strong><span style="font-family: 'Segoe Script';"><span style="color: #a10;">Pepper</span><span style="color: #0c1;">Beast</span></span></strong>]] [[User talk:pepperbeast|<span style="color: #200">(talk)</span>]] 19:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
<hr/>
==Orphaned non-free image File:Chuice Logo.png==
<small>If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]] — [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) </small>
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Chuice Logo.png]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:TonyBallioni@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=817720435 -->


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 02:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
==POV tag on 2017–18 Iranian protests: Difference between revisions==
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Venner, Washington]] ==
Hi, can you please clarify on the talk page the reason of adding tag on the article. Then we can discuss to solve the problem.--<samp>[[User:Sa.vakilian|Seyyed]]([[User talk:Sa.vakilian|t]]-[[Special:Contributions/Sa.vakilian|c]])</samp> 03:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]
:{{ping|Sa.vakilian}}. I didn't add it. All I did was change it from a page template to a section template. {{u|MehrdadFR}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2017%E2%80%9318_Iranian_protests&type=revision&diff=818452616&oldid=818452236 added it].- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 03:29, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


The article [[:Venner, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
== Do not ever remove my comments ==
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad spur, not a "community" and never was. Two of the cited sources are GNIS (which is insufficient for notability); the fourth is the census bureau (which has no such entry), and reference 1 plainly says this was a rail spur. Therefore the article is inaccurate as well as a failure of [[WP:GEOLAND]] and [[WP:GNG]].'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
Ever.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 18:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
:Actually, if you post personal attacks, I will remove them and next time, I will open an AE case to examine why you have continued the same misconduct that you were admonished for in an Arbcom case. Now you have a nice day.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 19:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
::I welcome a full blown arbcom case to look at all your editing history and how you misuse this website to promote a biased and nonneutral treatise on people, making massive BLP violations everyday you do so.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 19:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
:This heading is inconsistent with [[WP:TPO]]. &#8213;[[User:Mandruss|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Mandruss'''''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandruss|<span style="color:#999;">&#9742;</span>]] 20:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Venner, Washington|the article's talk page]].
== Elizabeth George's books ==


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I've just added a ref for both articles. Thank you for the note on my talk page. Regards, [[User:Comte0|Comte0]] ([[User talk:Comte0|talk]]) 23:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Artesian, Washington]] ==
:Thanks for letting me know {{u|Comte0}}.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 23:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]


The article [[:Artesian, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
== The Essential Beatles ==
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location, sourced only to GNIS and a place-names gazetteer, neither of which is sufficient for notability. I can find several references to artesian wells in the Moxee area, [https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/223846701/?terms=artesian&match=1] for example, but none of these refer to a "community" of Artesian. Post office does not count for notability, and the coordinates locate to empty farmland. Fails [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
Why was this article removed and redirected? I could not find anything wrong I did with the article. Citations were in order and there was not any warning that it would be removed. [[User:Paulisdead|Paulisdead]] ([[User talk:Paulisdead|talk]]) 04:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
:Because of an AfD discussion that determined it is not independently notable. I believe I linked it in my edit summary. Also, see the article revision history.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 04:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
::I have read the original [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Essential Beatles|Article for deletion again]]. At that time, I believe there were less international releases (of The Beatles) on Wikipedia. Since then (2012), articles like [[Los Beatles (album)]], [[Greatest Hits Volume 1 (Beatles album)]], [[Very Together]] and [[Por Siempre Beatles]] have been added. I over hauled my original article and added the required citation to so that the compilation album The Essential Beatles was a significant enough release to warrant an article (it was in Australia's Top 10 and was in print for over a decade!). In short - the original reason for the articles deletion is no longer valid and there is no good reason as to why it should still be taken down. [[User:Paulisdead|Paulisdead]] ([[User talk:Paulisdead|talk]]) 03:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Artesian, Washington|the article's talk page]].
== A barnstar for you! ==


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 15:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Ashue, Washington]] ==
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Peace Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diplomacy'''

|-
The article [[:Ashue, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I appreciate your contributions regarding my topic ban as well as your thoughts on Arbitration Enforcement. --[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 13:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": [https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/46.4047/-120.4593]. Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>
|}

:Thank you {{U|MONGO}}. Best of luck to you and happy editing.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 13:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Ashue, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 15:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Birchfield, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Birchfield, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Another non-notable Yakima County rail point being falsely described as a community. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: [https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#13/46.5782/-120.4681], as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was to the road. Fails [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Birchfield, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 15:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Blackrock, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Blackrock, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of Joe Blow "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails [[WP:GEOLAND]] because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails [[WP:GNG]] for lack of SIGCOV.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Blackrock, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 15:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Emerald, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Emerald, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point sourced only to GNIS (reference 3 does not mention Emerald and is just a link to the US Census website). No coverage found of any type; 1965 USGS topo map does show Emerald as a cluster of a few buildings along the tracks: [https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/46.2989/-120.0904]. Today the railroad is gone and the site is just a couple of barns; not a community and never was. Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Emerald, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 15:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Farron, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Farron, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Another non-notable railroad waypoint; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Farron, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Flint, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Flint, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad spur, as per Reference 1, which is the only piece of information that could be found about this place. Not a community; fails [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Flint, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 16:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Givens Corner, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Givens Corner, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Givens Corner, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Birchfield, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Birchfield, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birchfield, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Ashue, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Ashue, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashue, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Farron, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Farron, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farron, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Blackrock, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Blackrock, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackrock, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Harwood, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Harwood, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location; only information found was appearance on the 1958 Wiley City USGS topo map: [https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/46.5823/-120.6562], where it is just an intersection with a church; and a mention in the 1922 Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide [https://books.google.com/books?id=DL8NAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA538&printsec=frontcover&dq=harwood+yakima&newbks=0&hl=en&ovso=1#v=onepage&q=harwood%20yakima&f=false], a directory. That's pretty thin gruel for coverage; the article cites only GNIS, which is insufficient for notability. Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Harwood, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Holtzinger, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Holtzinger, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point; the NPRHA document (reference 4) inconsistently describes Holtzinger as a "spur" and a "town". This is the only mention of Holtzinger that could be found, other than the 1958 Naches USGS topo, which shows it as a level crossing with a large building, probably a fruit warehouse: [https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#13/46.6540/-120.7644]. Nothing else found; fails [[WP:GEOLAND]] and [[WP:GNG]]. GNIS is not sufficient for notability.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Holtzinger, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Liberty, Yakima County, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Liberty, Yakima County, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''No information about this location found. Sources cited are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the Census Bureau, which does not have any entry for a Liberty in Yakima County. Appears on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map as a schoolhouse: [https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/46.3557/-120.1462], and also as a dot on the 1979 Toppenish map. Current sattelite view shows only a farming area with a couple of agricultural buildings. Fails [[WP:GEOLAND]] and [[WP:GNG]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Liberty, Yakima County, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Lichty, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Lichty, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Just a railroad siding, not a "community". All sources cited describe it as a rail point; having a post office is insufficient for notability as rural post offices were often not located in "communities" at all. Fails [[WP:GEOLAND]] and [[WP:GNG]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Lichty, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Midvale, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Midvale, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad junction; only information found (other than the cited sources, which do not establish notability) is the word "Midvale" at a rail wye on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map: [https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/46.2854/-120.0209]. Complete failure of [[WP:GEOLAND]] and [[WP:GNG]]; is not and never was a community.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Midvale, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:East Selah, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:East Selah, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:East Selah, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Pomona, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Pomona, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Pomona, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 23:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Yethonat, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Yethonat, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''There is not a single mention of this place in a single newspaper anywhere. There are not enough reliable sources available to expand this article.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Yethonat, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 00:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Weikel, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Weikel, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''There is not one mention of Weikel being a place in the local papers. Not enough reliable sources to expand this article.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Weikel, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 00:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Artesian, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Artesian, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artesian, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 01:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Nass, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Nass, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Non-notable rail point, not a community. Only two mentions of this place could be found, both from 1914: [https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/753977993/?terms=nass&match=1], about the comings and goings of people loading potatoes onto trains at "Nass Siding", and [https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/753978224/?terms=nass&match=1], a similarly trivial mention of a couple of locals going about their lives. Complete failure of [[WP:GEOLAND]] and [[WP:GNG]]. Furthermore, the census bureau listing in the references is a dishonest attempt to make this place appear better-documented than it is; there is no entry for Nass.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Nass, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Pinecliff, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Pinecliff, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''An HOA is not a "populated, legally-recognized place"; furthermore, the fact that the author of this stub describes Pinecliff as 20 miles west of Ellensburg indicates they have no idea what they're talking about; this development is well over an hour from Ellensburg by car (due to terrain), and unless you can fly, the closest town is Yakima. First 2 sources are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the third has no such listing, apparently added to pad the reference list. Total failure of [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:GEOLAND]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Pinecliff, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 01:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Sawyer, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Sawyer, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''No evidence found that this was ever a community. Apart from reference 4 (which describes it inconsistently as a town and a rail junction), only two mentions could be found: One line in Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide from 1922([https://books.google.com/books?id=DL8NAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA908&printsec=frontcover&dq=sawyer+yakima&newbks=0&hl=en&ovso=1#v=onepage&q=sawyer%20yakima&f=false]), and one passing mention from 1956: "Mr. and Mrs. Basil Kimmel of Sawyer were dinner guests..." ([https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/image/753988015/?terms=sawyer&match=1]). This is about as trivial as coverage gets. Current satellite image shows a warehouse surrounded by farmland, with a Sawyer Fire Station nearby. Fails [[WP:GEOLAND]] and [[WP:GNG]]. Not a notable place.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Sawyer, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:WeirdNAnnoyed|WeirdNAnnoyed]] ([[User talk:WeirdNAnnoyed|talk]]) 02:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:East Selah, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:East Selah, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Selah, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 23:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Pomona, Washington]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Pomona, Washington]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomona, Washington]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 00:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Rimrock, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Rimrock, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Satellite shows a small cluster of houses at the base of the dam, the airport is in a different city despite being very nearby. Google says it's in the county. Local paper coverage runs from the 1890's to 1988. In 1899 it is a geological feature (https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-sheep-roadway/141277727/) Fast forward to 1920, and it's become a popular camp site, many people go camping and hunting there. (example:https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-camping-at-rimrock/141278267/). In 1925 the lake was created and afterward Fishing was added to the list of activities. (https://www.newspapers.com/article/grandview-herald-rimrock-lake/141278748/). I remember reading about elk being reintroduced, and sure enough rimrock is good for that too (1936: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-1936-not-a-town/141279168/) I goes on like that for decades, people picnicking, fishing etc all the way to modern times. There is no town there now and I've documented very thoroughly that there wasn't ever one. It's GNIS confabulating a geological feature into a town.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Rimrock, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 21:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Wenas, Washington]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Wenas, Washington]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''The article says nothing is there now, the satellite says nothing is there now. Fortunately, the newspapers cover the area from the 1890's to the late 80's. There are many mentions of Wenas as a valley where people live, and lake where people recreate. There are no mentions of a town named Wenas to be found. GNIS likely confabulated the lake or the wildlife area into a town. Here is a sampling of the nature of the place.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-1899-wenas-valley/141290709/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-of-the-wenas-1909/141291255/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-in-the-wenas-1/141291970/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-wenas-valley/141292628/'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Wenas, Washington|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:James.folsom|James.folsom]] ([[User talk:James.folsom|talk]]) 21:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of [[:Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert]]==
[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[:Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[:Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:Mfd notice --> [[User:Joy|Joy]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 12:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
== "[[:Wikipedia:RACIST]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:RACIST&redirect=no Wikipedia:RACIST]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30#Wikipedia:RACIST}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> --[[User:MikutoH|<span style="color: #be1918;">'''MikutoH'''</span>]] [[User talk:MikutoH|<sup><span style="color:#ee8b39;"> '''talk!''' </span></sup>]] 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


==Concern regarding [[Draft:Ruth, Washington]]==
== please stop ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, MrX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that [[Draft:Ruth, Washington]], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months [[WP:G13|may be deleted]], so if you wish to retain the page, please [[Special:EditPage/Draft:Ruth, Washington|edit it]] again&#32;or [[WP:USERFY|request]] that it be moved to your userspace.


If the page has already been deleted, you can [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13|request it be undeleted]] so you can continue working on it.
Please stop what looks like stalking and vandalizing. [[User:Tomdo08|Tomdo08]] ([[User talk:Tomdo08|talk]]) 01:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
:What are you talking about {{u|Tomdo08}}?- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 01:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 16:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
== Time on the talk page ==
==Your draft article, [[Draft:Ruth, Washington]]==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]


Hello, MrX. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|draft]] page you started, "[[Draft:Ruth, Washington|Ruth]]".
Hey {{u|MrX}} — I don't object to your closing discussions once consensus is clear (in fact I think it's a useful thing on talk pages generally). However, I think it'd be helpful to give a little more time before closing them. For instance in your last closure at the Russia election interference page, I was hoping to make a comment and hadn't gotten around to it yet. All I was going to say, there, is that 1) most of Putin's latest statement doesn't add that much, unless we're going to add more background to election interference generally (e.g. in the background). 2) Since Putin is named 112 times in the article, it certainly is the case that his view deserves merit (and his words have also been widely reported). Best, -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 20:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
:Even if you strongly support adding Putin's unfiltered comments to the article, it's still not going to change the outcome of no consensus to add the material (or there is consensus to omit it). The OP is grasping at straws to the point of disruption, as he has done several times before. I do not see the point of keeping the discussion open when it is plainly trending away from support for the OPs proposed edit.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 20:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
::It's not that the final decision would change, it's that the conversation might be somewhat different. It's that much to ask for a week, or even 3 days, before closing discussion (I think you waited 17 hours in this case). -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 20:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
:::I think it's very ill-advised, but I really don't feel like debating it all day.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 20:55, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
::::Again, I don't mind you closing discussion — I'd even thank you for taking the time to do it — but please just give other editors time to read the posts. I also like to think about what people are writing for a few days before making up my mind sometimes. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 22:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
:::::Wow, thank you {{u|MrX}}, I just saw your removal of the close, and really appreciate it. I'll try to be sure to comment in the next few days, and as I mentioned above, I don't mind if you close after some reasonable time has passed. Just FYI — and you've been around quite some time so I know you'll have your own thoughts on this — I don't think you actually need to respond to every comment on these talk entries, especially if it seems they'll peter out on their own. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 18:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
::::::Someone else must have re-opened the discussion because I didn't. I would almost never oppose reversing a close of mine on something I'm involved with.- [[user talk:MrX|MrX]] 18:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
:::::::Hmmm OK. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 19:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
:When an editor who has a long record of incompetent, nothere, and other disruptive behavior repeatedly raises a POV that clearly contradicts the weight of RS and clearly contravenes recent consensus, there is no value to the marginal comment. Quite the opposite -- the principle should be [[WP:DENY]] and the only effect of further comments is to encourage even more distractions and diversions of editor resources. In my personal opinion, it's clear that this situation needed to be closed. Note that MrX did not hat it or archive it, but rather that he evaluated the comments and summarized them in an appropriate close. What possible reason would there be to prolong such an event? [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 22:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3ARuth%2C+Washington request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
==Disambiguation link notification for January 18==


Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> [[User:Hey man im josh|Hey man im josh]] ([[User talk:Hey man im josh|talk]]) 22:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Racial views of Donald Trump]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[The Hill]] and [[Vox]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Racial_views_of_Donald_Trump check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Racial_views_of_Donald_Trump?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are [[WP:INTDABLINK|usually incorrect]], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].)</small>
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Plaza South Tower]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]


The article [[:Plaza South Tower]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Notability not demonstrated per [[WP:GEOFEAT]] for buildings.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
== Warning ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Plaza South Tower|the article's talk page]].
There is a one revert rule on [[Alex Jones]] which you have broken. This constitutes edit warring, which can lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. [[User:KU2018|KU2018]] ([[User talk:KU2018|talk]]) 15:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> – [[User:The Grid|<span style="color:navy">The Grid</span>]] ([[User talk:The Grid|<span style="color:navy">talk</span>]]) 20:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant Alex Jones. But you have now reverted both twice. I have reported you to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]]

Latest revision as of 20:55, 14 November 2024

😔

[edit]

--Floquenbeam (talk) 19:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can agree on that one. Me and MrX rarely agreed either but that does not mean I wanted to see them leave like this. I do hope you return. PackMecEng (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I endorse this comment. I always viewed MrX as someone I could approach for a better discussion no matter if we disagreed on the content. Mr Ernie (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's a shame. I was going to ask MrX to help write a refinement of the RfC guidelines to cover challenged closes, because we have terrible processes around this and it is probably the only area on Wikipedia where a single person can effectively mandate specific content. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
MrX, I do hope you return to the project, even if after you take time off. Your contributions have been superb, and greatly valued - certainly by me and many others. You know, I'm strongly reminded of a quote by John G. Roberts, Jr., talking about a difficult case:
"Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served."
We the community - and ultimately our end-user, the reader - have always been well served by your contributions and wisdom. And it would be regrettable if this one messy disagreement between you and Guy — two users I respect very much — led you to part ways with the project permanently. Be well, and all best wishes. --Neutralitytalk 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality, Thank you. I like and respect MrX. I am mystified by the trajectory this has taken, and genuinely mortified that he has expressed a desire to leave, on which I hope he reconsiders. I hope people will take a look at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment § Process for challenging closes. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry that you're taking a break because of this, it's unnecessary, except of course as merited holiday if stress was too high. It's unfortunate when what should be a hobby becomes responsibility, work and no play (and that of course happens because we care about the project). I hope to see you around again when you feel like it, —PaleoNeonate02:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a sad turn of events, but here's to happiness in your break, and in your life, MrX. starship.paint (talk) 03:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you ever come back, here's some tea for you. Lucky wiki-tea doesn't get cold. starship.paint (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rather late here due to my break, but like others I wish you well and happiness in your life. I'll never forget the help you gave me when I first started here and even after that, you remained someone I could look up to as an editor for his wisdom and who always remained civil even amidst the most controversial discussions. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Neutrality, Starship.paint, Kraose, Ugog Nizdast, and Mr Ernie. I appreciate your heartfelt kindness. - MrX 🖋 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
MrX, I am so happy to hear from you. I hope that you are well, these have been tough times indeed. starship.paint (exalt) 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A toast sandwich for you!

[edit]
Looks like I missed something a few months ago, and only just realized I hadn't seen your name around in a while.

Looking at the food or drink items in the WikiLove gadget like greeting cards, I'm thinking about the signification of the various options. Something sweet? Savory? Coffee/tea seem pretty generally friendly, I guess. I'll go with toast sandwich because I have no idea what that would mean to receive a toast sandwich. Kind of a "huh?" -- but maybe a "huh?" that draws your attention to Wikipedia long enough to come back after a [restful, hopefully] break. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Rhododendrites. I appreciate your sentiment. And I've always appreciated your insightful comments that accrue to the benefit of Wikipedia. - MrX 🖋 20:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
Also miss having MrX around. Great contributor. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Stefka Bulgaria, for your kindness. - MrX 🖋 20:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Seven years!

miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC:)

Thank you Gerda Arendt for you making Wikipeidia exceptional, as you always do. - MrX 🖋 20:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boden, Florida for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boden, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boden, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

[edit]

Hello MrX! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 17:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boo!

[edit]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Good source

[edit]

Template:Good source has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vista, Washington for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vista, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vista, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richland Junction, Richland for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richland Junction, Richland, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richland Junction, Richland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chaffee, Washington for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaffee, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaffee, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Whitcomb, Washington for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitcomb, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitcomb, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apricot, Washington for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apricot, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apricot, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North McNary, Washington for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North McNary, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North McNary, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove TBAN

[edit]

here. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hydrogen water for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hydrogen water is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrogen water until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

[edit]

Hi MrX! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

[edit]
Happy New Year!

Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, MrX!

The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Chuice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Basically WP:PROMO. Non-notable product. Orphaned for a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chuice Logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chuice Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Venner, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railroad spur, not a "community" and never was. Two of the cited sources are GNIS (which is insufficient for notability); the fourth is the census bureau (which has no such entry), and reference 1 plainly says this was a rail spur. Therefore the article is inaccurate as well as a failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Artesian, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location, sourced only to GNIS and a place-names gazetteer, neither of which is sufficient for notability. I can find several references to artesian wells in the Moxee area, [1] for example, but none of these refer to a "community" of Artesian. Post office does not count for notability, and the coordinates locate to empty farmland. Fails WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Ashue, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": [2]. Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Birchfield, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another non-notable Yakima County rail point being falsely described as a community. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: [3], as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was to the road. Fails WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Blackrock, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of Joe Blow "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails WP:GEOLAND because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails WP:GNG for lack of SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Emerald, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railroad point sourced only to GNIS (reference 3 does not mention Emerald and is just a link to the US Census website). No coverage found of any type; 1965 USGS topo map does show Emerald as a cluster of a few buildings along the tracks: [4]. Today the railroad is gone and the site is just a couple of barns; not a community and never was. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Farron, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another non-notable railroad waypoint; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Flint, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railroad spur, as per Reference 1, which is the only piece of information that could be found about this place. Not a community; fails WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Givens Corner, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Givens Corner, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Givens Corner, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Birchfield, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birchfield, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birchfield, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashue, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashue, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashue, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farron, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farron, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farron, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blackrock, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blackrock, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackrock, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Harwood, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location; only information found was appearance on the 1958 Wiley City USGS topo map: [5], where it is just an intersection with a church; and a mention in the 1922 Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide [6], a directory. That's pretty thin gruel for coverage; the article cites only GNIS, which is insufficient for notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Holtzinger, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railroad point; the NPRHA document (reference 4) inconsistently describes Holtzinger as a "spur" and a "town". This is the only mention of Holtzinger that could be found, other than the 1958 Naches USGS topo, which shows it as a level crossing with a large building, probably a fruit warehouse: [7]. Nothing else found; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. GNIS is not sufficient for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Liberty, Yakima County, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No information about this location found. Sources cited are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the Census Bureau, which does not have any entry for a Liberty in Yakima County. Appears on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map as a schoolhouse: [8], and also as a dot on the 1979 Toppenish map. Current sattelite view shows only a farming area with a couple of agricultural buildings. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Lichty, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a railroad siding, not a "community". All sources cited describe it as a rail point; having a post office is insufficient for notability as rural post offices were often not located in "communities" at all. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Midvale, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable railroad junction; only information found (other than the cited sources, which do not establish notability) is the word "Midvale" at a rail wye on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map: [9]. Complete failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG; is not and never was a community.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article East Selah, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Pomona, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Yethonat, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is not a single mention of this place in a single newspaper anywhere. There are not enough reliable sources available to expand this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Weikel, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is not one mention of Weikel being a place in the local papers. Not enough reliable sources to expand this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 00:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artesian, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artesian, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artesian, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Nass, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rail point, not a community. Only two mentions of this place could be found, both from 1914: [10], about the comings and goings of people loading potatoes onto trains at "Nass Siding", and [11], a similarly trivial mention of a couple of locals going about their lives. Complete failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Furthermore, the census bureau listing in the references is a dishonest attempt to make this place appear better-documented than it is; there is no entry for Nass.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Pinecliff, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An HOA is not a "populated, legally-recognized place"; furthermore, the fact that the author of this stub describes Pinecliff as 20 miles west of Ellensburg indicates they have no idea what they're talking about; this development is well over an hour from Ellensburg by car (due to terrain), and unless you can fly, the closest town is Yakima. First 2 sources are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the third has no such listing, apparently added to pad the reference list. Total failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Sawyer, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found that this was ever a community. Apart from reference 4 (which describes it inconsistently as a town and a rail junction), only two mentions could be found: One line in Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide from 1922([12]), and one passing mention from 1956: "Mr. and Mrs. Basil Kimmel of Sawyer were dinner guests..." ([13]). This is about as trivial as coverage gets. Current satellite image shows a warehouse surrounded by farmland, with a Sawyer Fire Station nearby. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Not a notable place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of East Selah, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Selah, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Selah, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

James.folsom (talk) 23:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pomona, Washington for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pomona, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomona, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

James.folsom (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Rimrock, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Satellite shows a small cluster of houses at the base of the dam, the airport is in a different city despite being very nearby. Google says it's in the county. Local paper coverage runs from the 1890's to 1988. In 1899 it is a geological feature (https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-sheep-roadway/141277727/) Fast forward to 1920, and it's become a popular camp site, many people go camping and hunting there. (example:https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-camping-at-rimrock/141278267/). In 1925 the lake was created and afterward Fishing was added to the list of activities. (https://www.newspapers.com/article/grandview-herald-rimrock-lake/141278748/). I remember reading about elk being reintroduced, and sure enough rimrock is good for that too (1936: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-1936-not-a-town/141279168/) I goes on like that for decades, people picnicking, fishing etc all the way to modern times. There is no town there now and I've documented very thoroughly that there wasn't ever one. It's GNIS confabulating a geological feature into a town.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Wenas, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article says nothing is there now, the satellite says nothing is there now. Fortunately, the newspapers cover the area from the 1890's to the late 80's. There are many mentions of Wenas as a valley where people live, and lake where people recreate. There are no mentions of a town named Wenas to be found. GNIS likely confabulated the lake or the wildlife area into a town. Here is a sampling of the nature of the place.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-1899-wenas-valley/141290709/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-of-the-wenas-1909/141291255/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-in-the-wenas-1/141291970/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-wenas-valley/141292628/

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Joy (talk) 12:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:RACIST has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30 § Wikipedia:RACIST until a consensus is reached. --MikutoH talk! 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ruth, Washington

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MrX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruth, Washington, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ruth, Washington

[edit]

Hello, MrX. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ruth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Plaza South Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not demonstrated per WP:GEOFEAT for buildings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – The Grid (talk) 20:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]